Cochlear implantation in children with Jervell, Lange-Nielsen syndrome

Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen Syndrome (JLNS). Methods Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched on Medline, Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits placed on language or year of publication. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 63 abstracts and 19 full texts. Of these, 9 studies met inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 66 patients with at least 72 implants. Hearing outcomes were generally good. Mortality secondary to cardiac complications within the follow up period occurred in at least five cases (7.6%), though three of these were thought to be unrelated to surgery. Potentially dangerous arrhythmias without associated morbidity were also noted in at least five patients. The methodological quality of included studies was modest, predominantly consisting of case reports and non-controlled case series with small numbers of patients. All studies were OCEBM grade IV. One study contributed 41/66 patients (62%). Hearing outcomes following CI in JLNS are generally good with the majority of patients experiencing useful hearing improvement. Significant peri-operative cardiac risks exist and should be discussed with the patient and family during pre-operative counselling and prompt thorough investigation, pre-operative optimisation and peri-operative monitoring.

Cochlear Implantation in Congenital Long-QT Syndrome: A Comprehensive Study

OBJECTIVES

Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disease characterized by congenital sensorineural deafness and significant QT interval prolongation. Aims were to study the prevalence of long QT in congenital hearing loss, complications encountered, outcomes by Categories of auditory Performance (CAP) scores and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores and to create an algorithm with precautions to be followed in Long QT children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study was done at Auditory implant center at a tertiary referral care ENT hospital which includes 41 paediatric patients who were diagnosed to have Long QT during preoperative assessment and underwent cochlear implantation. A standard Protocol was followed in all candidates which includes comprehensive targeted history and investigations, preoperative and intraoperative precautions, and the findings were recorded.

RESULTS

Preoperative prophylactic Beta blockers, avoiding sympathetic stimulation and drugs prolonging QT interval with rational use of Magnesium Sulphate and standby of defibrillator were the standard precautions practised. Fatal Arrhythmias were encountered intra-operatively in five patients which was treated with cardiac pacing. Cardiac monitoring was done intraoperatively and during switch-on. Significant improvement in CAP and SIR scores were observed at 3 and 6 months when compared to their base line values.

CONCLUSION

With special attention to preoperative evaluation, appropriate intraoperative precautions and monitoring, judicious surgical planning and post surgical follow-up cochlear implantation may be performed safely in patients with JLNS with good postoperative results allowing for improved audition.

Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome in cochlear implanted patients: our experience and a review of literature

OBJECTIVES

To share our experience in cochlear implanted patients with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS), to review the literature results and to disclose precautions which have to be taken dealing with these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electrocardiograms (ECG) of 503 children with congenital bilateral profound hearing loss which were cochlear implanted in cochlear implant center of a tertiary hospital were evaluated for long QT syndrome. Clinical reports of the patients with JLNS were evaluated and a review of literature performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of disease was 0.79% (four cases) in our center which is in the range of literature reports (0-2.6%). None of our patients had a history of syncopal attack. Two patients (50%) were born from parents with consanguineous marriage. Considering all precautions their cochlear implant surgeries were done uneventfully. A review of the literature has identified sixteen reports on cochlear implantation in a total of 38 children with JLNS. Similar to our cases none of the authors reported cardiac events during device switch-on. Nine available reports about the outcome of cochlear implantation in these patients indicated good auditory outcome.

CONCLUSION

It is recommended that all congenitally deaf patients have an ECG taken as a part of the evaluation. As auditory stimuli is reported to be a specific trigger, it is prudent to activate the processor with continuous heart monitoring even though there is no reported cardiac event during device switch-on. Cochlear implantation can be performed relatively safely in these patients if necessary precautions have been taken appropriately and their auditory outcome is good. Triggers of the cardiac events should be avoided throughout their life.

New criteria of indication and selection of patients to cochlear implant

Numerous changes continue to occur in cochlear implant candidacy. In general, these have been accompanied by concomitant and satisfactory changes in surgical techniques. Together, this has advanced the utility and safety of cochlear implantation. Most devices are now approved for use in patients with severe to profound unilateral hearing loss rather then the prior requirement of a bilateral profound loss. Furthermore, studies have begun utilizing short electrode arrays for shallow insertion in patients with considerable low-frequency residual hearing. This technique will allow the recipient to continue to use acoustically amplified hearing for the low frequencies simultaneously with a cochlear implant for the high frequencies. The advances in design of, and indications for, cochlear implants have been matched by improvements in surgical techniques and decrease in complications. The resulting improvements in safety and efficacy have further encouraged the use of these devices. This paper will review the new concepts in the candidacy of cochlear implant. Medline data base was used to search articles dealing with the following topics: cochlear implant in younger children, cochlear implant and hearing preservation, cochlear implant for unilateral deafness and tinnitus, genetic hearing loss and cochlear implant, bilateral cochlear implant, neuropathy and cochlear implant and neural plasticity, and the selection of patients for cochlear implant.

Surgical aspects of cochlear implantation in syndromic children

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to report surgical results and outcomes of cochlear implantation in a large series of children with syndromes from one centre.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All syndromic children who underwent cochlear implantation at Great Ormond Street Hospital, from January 2000 to December 2010 were included in this study. The surgical technique was analysed and audiological outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Over the 10-year period of this study, a total of 88 cochleas in 67 children with syndromes were implanted. The common syndromes implanted in this study were Ushers syndrome (23 patients, 33 cochleas), Wardenburgs syndrome (8 patients, 9 cochleas), Pendreds syndrome (4 patients, 4 cochleas), Jervell-Lange-Neilsen syndrome (3 patients, 4 cochleas), Enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome (4 patients, 7 cochleas), Cogans syndrome (3 patients, 4 cochleas), CHARGE (5 patients, 6 cochleas), and Branchio Oto Renal syndrome (3 patients, 4 cochleas). Pre-operative radiological inner ear anatomy was found to be abnormal in 28.4% (25/88) cochleas in this study group. Full insertion of the electrode was achieved in 93.1% (82/88) of cochleas, partial insertion in three cochleas, and insertion was abandoned in three cochleas. Early complications were seen in 6.8% (6/88) of implantations. All the 64/67 children who were implanted are still using the implant.

CONCLUSION

Cochlear implantation in syndromic children is challenging in both its audiological and surgical aspects. Good surgical results and good audiological and speech outcomes were achieved in this study, and subjective improvement in quality of life was achieved in these patients.

Cochlear implantation in children with Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome - a cautionary tale

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

Jervell and Lange-Nielsen (JLN) syndrome is a rare cause of congenital profound hearing loss associated with a prolonged QT interval on the electrocardiogram. Children presenting for cochlear implantation with this condition may be asymptomatic but are at risk of sudden death. SCREENING AND SUBSEQUENT: careful management is therefore required to ensure a successful outcome. We present our experience of cochlear implantation in children with JLN syndrome, including two who died unexpectedly, and suggest a protocol for management of such cases. Clinical presentation Four cases of cochlear implantation in JLN syndrome are described. None had any previous cardiological family history. Two were diagnosed pre-operatively but, despite appropriate management under a cardiologist, died from cardiac arrest; the first in the perioperative period following reimplantation for infection, and the second unrelated to his cochlear implant surgery. The other two patients were diagnosed only subsequent to their implantation and continue to use their implants successfully.

CONCLUSION

These cases highlight the variation in presentation of JLN syndrome, and the spectrum of disease severity that exists. Our protocol stresses the importance of careful assessment and counselling of parents by an experienced implant team.

Electrocardiogram screening of deaf children for long QT syndrome: are we following UK national guidelines?

INTRODUCTION

Jervell-Lange-Nielsen syndrome is characterised by congenital deafness and a long QT interval on electrocardiography.

AIM

(1) To survey UK national practice regarding electrocardiography screening of deaf children referred to cochlear implant centres, performed to evaluate for prolonged QT interval as recommended by national guidelines, and (2) to review local practice.

METHODS

Data were collected via a questionnaire sent to all UK cochlear implant centres, and via review of the medical records of a local cochlear implant centre database.

RESULTS

Eight (42 per cent) of the 19 cochlear implant centres surveyed performed electrocardiographic screening. Thirteen cases of long QT syndrome were reported in seven centres, with two related deaths. In our local cochlear implant centre, 14 (7.1 per cent) of 193 children had abnormal electrocardiograms; one definite long QT syndrome case and 13 borderline cases were identified.

CONCLUSION

Despite clear national guidelines for electrocardiographic screening of deaf children, there is wide variation in practice. Our local practice of performing investigations, including electrocardiography, during magnetic resonance imaging sedation has been very successful. Electrocardiograms should be reviewed by trained clinicians, and corrected QT intervals should be calculated manually.

Cochlear implantation in common forms of genetic deafness

Genetic factors are among the main etiologies of severe to profound hearing loss and may play an important role in cochlear implantation (CI) outcomes. While genes for common forms of deafness have been cloned, efforts to correlate the functional outcome of CIs with a genetic form of deafness carried by the patient have been largely anecdotal to date. It has been suggested that the differences in auditory performance may be explained by differences in the number of surviving spiral ganglion cells, etiology of hearing loss, and other factors. Knowledge of the specific loci and mutations involved in patients who receive cochlear implants may elucidate other factors related to CI performance. In this review article, current knowledge of cochlear implants for hereditary hearing loss will be discussed with an emphasis on relevant clinical genotype-phenotype correlations.