Immunotherapy in head and neck cancer: current practice and future possibilities. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:19-28. [PMID: 18761763 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215108003356]

The Evasion Mechanisms of Cancer Immunity and Drug Intervention in the Tumor Microenvironment

Recently, in the field of cancer treatment, the paradigm has changed to immunotherapy that activates the immune system to induce cancer attacks. Among them, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are attracting attention as excellent and continuous clinical results. However, it shows not only limitations such as efficacy only in some patients or some indications, but also side-effects and resistance occur. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the factors of the tumor microenvironment (TME) that affect the efficacy of immunotherapy, that is, the mechanism by which cancer grows while evading or suppressing attacks from the immune system within the TME. Tumors can evade attacks from the immune system through various mechanisms such as restricting antigen recognition, inhibiting the immune system, and inducing T cell exhaustion. In addition, tumors inhibit or evade the immune system by accumulating specific metabolites and signal factors within the TME or limiting the nutrients available to immune cells. In order to overcome the limitations of immunotherapy and develop effective cancer treatments and therapeutic strategies, an approach is needed to understand the functions of cancer and immune cells in an integrated manner based on the TME. In this review, we will examine the effects of the TME on cancer cells and immune cells, especially how cancer cells evade the immune system, and examine anti-cancer strategies based on TME.

Novel therapies in the management of oral cancer: An update

An estimated 4% of all cancers are of the oral cavity or oropharyngeal. Presently, management of the oral cancers mainly includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy either alone or in combination depending on the individual case. Each of these techniques has their advantages and disadvantages. Surgery demands removal of cancerous tissue causing disfigurement and functional impairment. Radiotherapy has significant side effects like mucositis, myelosuppression, xerostomia and dental caries. With the advent of newer treatment methods like the targeted therapy, immune therapy and gene therapy, treatment outcomes are better with fewer side effects. This has generally improved survival rates and quality of life of cancer patients.

The immune system and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: from carcinogenesis to new therapeutic opportunities

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) exhibit complex interactions with the host immune system that may simultaneously explain resistance to various therapeutic modalities and that may also provide opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Discoveries in immunologic research over the last decade have led to an increased understanding of these interactions as well as the development of a multitude of investigational immunotherapies. Here, we describe the interaction between HNSCC and the immune system, including a discussion of immune cells involved with tumor carcinogenesis and the role of immune-modulating factors derived from tumors. We also describe the current immunotherapeutic approaches being investigated for HNSCC, including a discussion of the successes and limitations. With this review, we hope to present HNSCC as a model to guide future research in cancer immunology.

Relationship between head and neck cancer therapy and some genetic endpoints

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common human malignancy worldwide. The main forms of treatment for HNC are surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT). However, the choice of therapy depends on the tumor staging and approaches, which are aimed at organ preservation. Because of systemic RT and CT genotoxicity, one of the important side effects is a secondary cancer that can result from the activity of radiation and antineoplastic drugs on healthy cells. Ionizing radiation can affect the DNA, causing single and double-strand breaks, DNA-protein crosslinks and oxidative damage. The severity of radiotoxicity can be directly associated with the radiation dosimetry and the dose-volume differences. Regarding CT, cisplatin is still the standard protocol for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma, the most common cancer located in the oral cavity. However, simultaneous treatment with cisplatin, bleomycin and 5-fluorouracil or treatment with paclitaxel and cisplatin are also used. These drugs can interact with the DNA, causing DNA crosslinks, double and single-strand breaks and changes in gene expression. Currently, the late effects of therapy have become a recurring problem, mainly due to the increased survival of HNC patients. Herein, we present an update of the systemic activity of RT and CT for HNC, with a focus on their toxicogenetic and toxicogenomic effects.

Distribution of circulating natural killer cells and T lymphocytes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Natural killer (NK) cells are capable of eliminating malignantly transformed cells without prior sensitization. In contrast to NK-cells, T lymphocytes possess antitumourous activity that is restricted to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) recognition. The aim of this study was to determine the causes of the different distributions of these cell types in the peripheral blood of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC).

METHODS

A cohort of 105 subjects was divided into three clinical groups: non-treated HNSCC patients, treated relapse-free HNSCC patients and healthy control subjects. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from venous blood, subsets were depleted, flow cytometric counts were made and subsequently correlation analyses with clinical parameters were performed.

RESULTS

Treated relapse-free HNSCC patients have a significantly increased mean proportion of NK-cells in PBMC of 26.39% (p<0.001), whereas T lymphocytes and natural killer-T-(NKT) cells of treated patients have a significantly decreased mean proportion in PBMC of 55.15% (p<0.05) at least 12 months after treatment. This inverse redistribution of these two subsets is reflected in a significantly increased mean NK/T-ratio of 0.54 (p<0.05) in treated patients. The NK/T-ratio correlates with the systemic invasiveness of the type of therapy patients undergo and is highest after surgery with adjuvant radiochemotherapy (0.64, rs=0.334, p<0.01). This appears to be a post-therapeutic long-term effect in treated patients, as they had a mean relapse-free period until venous puncture of 47.9 months in our study. We also demonstrated age-dependent changes in the peripheral distribution of T- and NK-cells.

CONCLUSION

These findings reveal new aspects in understanding tumour biology and interactions with the cellular immune system which provide novel starting points for further research.

Increased lymphocyte infiltration in patients with head and neck cancer treated with the IRX-2 immunotherapy regimen

Twenty-seven subjects with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck received the neoadjuvant IRX-2 immunotherapy regimen prior to surgery in a Phase 2 trial. Pretreatment tumor biopsies were compared with the primary tumor surgical specimens for lymphocyte infiltration, necrosis and fibrosis, using hematoxylin and eosin stain and immunohistochemistry in 25 subjects. Sections were examined by three pathologists. Relative to pretreatment biopsies, increases in lymphocyte infiltration (LI) were seen using H and E or immunohistochemistry. CD3+ CD4+ T cells and CD20+ B cells were primarily found in the peritumoral stroma and CD3+ CD8+ T cells and CD68+ macrophages were mainly intratumoral. LI in the surgical specimens were associated with reductions in the primary tumor size. Improved survival at 5 years was correlated with high overall LI in the tumor specimens. Neoadjuvant IRX-2 immunotherapy regimen may restore immune responsiveness presumably by mobilizing tumor infiltrating effector lymphocytes and macrophages into the tumor.

Mutagenic evaluation of combined paclitaxel and cisplatin treatment in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster

Recent studies have added paclitaxel (PAC) to traditional cisplatin (CIS) regimen to treat squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The target of these antineoplastic agents is nuclear DNA for CIS and microtubules for PAC, although it is not restricted to malignant cells. In this study, the genotoxicity of the combined treatment of PAC and CIS was investigated using the standard version of the wing Somatic Mutation and Recombination Test (SMART) in Drosophila melanogaster. Quantitative and qualitative genotoxic effects of these compounds were estimated by comparing wing spot frequencies in marker-heterozygous to balancer-heterozygous flies. Two different concentrations of PAC (0.0025 and 0.005mM) and CIS (0.025 and 0.05mM) as well as combinations of them were employed. The results demonstrated that the spindle poison PAC alone was not genotoxic in this test system, while CIS was able to induce a high incidence of DNA damage in both genotypes, mainly related to somatic recombination. The data obtained for the combined treatments showed that its genotoxicity varied with the concentrations used. In small concentrations the number of total spots induced by combination was reduced in relation to CIS 0.025mM just for marker-heterozygous flies, showing that somatic recombination was the prevalent event involved. At higher concentrations the combined treatment showed significant reductions in the frequencies of large single spots, for both genotypes, and twin spots for marker-heterozygous flies, but did not significantly reduce the total spots frequency in either genotype. The data suggest that aneugenic activity of PAC could be responsible for the reduction in the genotoxicity of CIS.