1
|
Gule-Monroe MK, Calle S, Policeni B, Juliano AF, Agarwal M, Chow LQM, Dubey P, Friedman ER, Hagiwara M, Hanrahan KD, Jain V, Rath TJ, Smith RB, Subramaniam RM, Taheri MR, Yom SS, Zander D, Burns J. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Post-Therapy Assessment of Head and Neck Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S521-S564. [PMID: 38040469 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of head and neck cancer at initial staging and as part of post-treatment surveillance is a key component of patient care as it guides treatment strategy and aids determination of prognosis. Head and neck cancer includes a heterogenous group of malignancies encompassing several anatomic sites and histologies, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common. Together this comprises the seventh most common cancer worldwide. At initial staging comprehensive imaging delineating the anatomic extent of the primary site, while also assessing the nodal involvement of the neck is necessary. The treatment of head and neck cancer often includes a combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Post-treatment imaging is tailored for the evaluation of treatment response and early detection of local, locoregional, and distant recurrent tumor. Cross-sectional imaging with CT or MRI is recommended for the detailed anatomic delineation of the primary site. PET/CT provides complementary metabolic information and can map systemic involvement. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susana Calle
- Research Author, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bruno Policeni
- Panel Chair, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Amy F Juliano
- Panel Vice-Chair, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mohit Agarwal
- Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Laura Q M Chow
- University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas; American Society of Clinical Oncology
| | | | | | - Mari Hagiwara
- New York University Langone Health, New York, New York
| | | | - Vikas Jain
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Russell B Smith
- Baptist Medical Center, Jacksonville, Florida; American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- University of Otago, Dunedin, Otepoti, New Zealand; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - M Reza Taheri
- George Washington University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Sue S Yom
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Judah Burns
- Specialty Chair, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Löhr CV, Stieger-Vanegas SM, Terry JL, Milovancev M, Medlock J. Targeting Peritumoral Lesions Identified by Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Feline Injection-Site Sarcomas for Microscopic Examination. Vet Pathol 2021; 58:923-934. [PMID: 33969752 DOI: 10.1177/03009858211012949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Peritumoral lesions identified during in vivo imaging of feline injection-site sarcoma (FISS) are frequently interpreted as neoplastic. We recently showed that most peritumoral imaging-identified lesions (PTIILs) in FISS are non-neoplastic. In this article, we describe a protocol to target PTIIL for microscopic examination and report on the protocol's performance. Ten client-owned cats with FISS were prospectively enrolled. A fiducial marker sutured onto the skin, centered on the palpable mass, served as reference point throughout the study. Each FISS and surrounding tissue was imaged in vivo by dual phase computed tomography angiography and multiple magnetic resonance imaging pulse sequences and each PTIIL documented. Subgross measurements obtained during trimming aided localization and identification of PTIIL during microscopy. Histologic findings were categorized by descending clinical relevance: neoplastic, equivocal, non-neoplastic, within normal limits (WNL). Based on in vivo imaging resolution limits, histologic findings were ≥3 mm in at least one dimension and ≥3 mm apart. Surgical margins served as control tissue for PTIILs. Eighty-one of 87 PTIIL were examined histologically; 13 were neoplastic, 16 equivocal, and 28 non-neoplastic; 24 had no identified histologic correlate. Two neoplastic and 10 equivocal findings were located outside of PTIILs but none of them were located in sections of surgical margins. Computation of a simple confusion matrix yielded fair sensitivity (70.4%) and low specificity (59.7%) for prediction of PTIIL by histologic findings. After combining instances of normal microanatomy with non-neoplastic histologic findings, specificity increased (85.1%) and sensitivity decreased (35.8%). The protocol is a blueprint for targeting PTIIL for microscopic examination but may benefit from further refinement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jesse L Terry
- 2694Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.,Dr Terry is now at MedVet Northern Utah, Sunset, UT, USA
| | | | - Jan Medlock
- 2694Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Magnetic resonance imaging based radiomics signature for the preoperative discrimination of stage I-II and III-IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2018; 106:1-6. [PMID: 30150029 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the predictive ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based radiomics signature for the preoperative staging in HNSCC. METHODS This study involved127 consecutive patients (training cohort: n = 85; testing cohort, n = 42) with stage I-IV HNSCC. A total of 970 radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted (T2W) (n = 485) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (ceT1W) (n = 485) MRI for each case. Radiomics signatures were constructed with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression. Associations between radiomics signatures and HNSCC staging were explored. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and classification performance of radiomics signatures were determined and compared with those of the visual assessment. RESULTS Ten features from T2W images, six from ceT1W images, and six from combined T2W and ceT1W images were selected by LASSO logistic regression. The three radiomics signatures of stage III-IV HNSCC were significantly higher than that for stage I-II in both cohorts (all P < 0.05). The radiomics signatures from ceT1W and combined images performed well in the discrimination of stage I-II and III-IV HNSCC, with AUCs of 0.828 and 0.850 in the training cohort, and AUCs of 0.853 and 0.849 in the testing cohort. Based on the cut-off value of the training cohort, the radiomics signature from combined images achieved best classification performance in both cohorts, with accuracies of 0.788 and 0.857, sensitivities of 0.836 and 0.885, and specificities of 0.700 and 0.813. Significant differences in accuracy and sensitivity were found between the radiomics signature from combined images and the visual assessment of the radiologists in the training cohort. CONCLUSION Radiomics signature based on MRI could discriminate stage I-II from stage III-IV HNSCC, which may serve as a complementary tool for preoperative staging.
Collapse
|