Diversity, phylogeny and intraspecific variability of Paradiplozoon species (Monogenea: Diplozoidae) parasitizing endemic cyprinoids in the Middle East

New species of Dermoergasilus Ho & Do, 1982 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Ergasilidae) parasitizing endemic cichlid Paretroplus polyactis (Bleeker) in Madagascar

Dermoergasilus madagascarensis n. sp. is described from the gills of Paretroplus polyactis, an endemic cichlid fish in Madagascar, using a combined morphological (light microscopy and SEM) and molecular approach (partial 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, and COI sequences). The new species is characterized mainly by possessing: (i) roughly pentagonal cephalosome; (ii) antennal endopodal segments covered with slightly inflated membrane; (iii) maxillule bearing 2 equally long outer setae and a minute inner seta; (iv) interpodal sternites of swimming legs ornamented with 3–4 rows of spinules; (v) genital segment and first abdominal somite both barrel-shaped; and (vi) a caudal ramus projecting into a digitiform process with inconspicuous terminal seta and bearing 3 terminal setae. The obtained DNA sequences of Malagasy species represent the first molecular data for species of Dermoergasilus. The 28S rDNA phylogeny showed the affiliation of D. madagascarensis n. sp. to Ergasilidae and its sister relationship with cosmopolitan Ergasilus sieboldi von Nordmann, 1832. The first checklist for all species of Dermoergasilus is provided.

Revisiting the type material of two African Diplozoinae (Diplozoidae: Monogenea), with remarks on morphology, systematics and diplozoid specificity

The morphological characterisation of Diplozoidae spp. is highly reliant on the details of the sclerotised components of the hooks and clamps in the haptor. Only six species of Paradiplozoon (Diplozoinae) have been described from Africa, four of which have adequate morphological and even comparative ITS2 rDNA data available. However, the descriptions of Paradiplozoon ghanense (Thomas, 1957) and Paradiplozoon aegyptense (Fischthal & Kuntz, 1963) lack essential taxonomic information, specifically the details for their haptoral sclerites. As such, all available material from museum collections for these two species were studied using light microscopy to supplement the original morphometric descriptions. The holotype and paratypes of P. aegyptense were studied, but only voucher material for P. ghanense could be sourced. However, this voucher material for P. ghanense was deposited by the species authority and bore a striking resemblance to the illustrations and collection details from the original description. They were thus identified as the type series for the taxon, with a lectotype and paralectotype designated. Both P. ghanense and P. aegyptense could be readily distinguished from other taxa based on the supplementary data generated here, supporting their distinctness. The haptoral sclerites of P. aegyptense were most similar to those of Paradiplozoon krugerense Dos Santos & Avenant-Oldewage, 2016, also described from Labeo spp., while the sclerites of P. ghanense were most similar to Paradiplozoon bingolense Civáňová, Koyun & Koubková, 2013 and Paradiplozoon iraqense Al-Nasiri & Balbuena, 2016. Additionally, a voucher of P. aegyptense collected from the alestid type host of P. ghanense was reidentified as the latter species here. This greatly simplified the known host specificity for Paradiplozoon spp. in Africa, with P. aegyptense now exclusively reported from Cypriniformes (Cyprinidae and Danionidae), and P. ghanense restricted to Characiformes (Alestidae). The occurrence of all diplozoids from non-cyprinoid hosts was also investigated and several records of diplozoids occurring on non-cyprinoid hosts were collated and scrutinised. Excluding the two instances of diplozoids described and exclusively occurring on Characiformes fishes (P. ghanense and Paradiplozoon tetragonopterini (Sterba, 1957)), most other non-cyprinoid collections appear sporadic and unsubstantiated, but warrant further investigation supported by diligent taxonomic data. Even though the morphometric descriptions of both P. ghanense and P. aegyptense were fully reported on here, additional material will be needed to study their genetic profiles and phylogeny.

Transcriptome Profile Analyses of Head Kidney in Roach (Rutilus rutilus), Common Bream (Abramis brama) and Their Hybrids: Does Infection by Monogenean Parasites in Freshwater Fish Reveal Differences in Fish Vigour among Parental Species and Their Hybrids?

Hybrid generations usually face either a heterosis advantage or a breakdown, that can be expressed by the level of parasite infection in hybrid hosts. Hybrids are less infected by parasites than parental species (especially F1 generations) or more infected than parental species (especially post-F1 generations). We performed the experiment with blood-feeding gill parasite Paradiplozoon homoion (Monogenea) infecting leuciscid species, Abramis brama and Rutilus rutilus, their F1 generation and two backcross generations. Backcross generations tended to be more parasitized than parental lines and the F1 generation. The number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was lower in F1 hybrids and higher in backcross hybrids when compared to each of the parental lines. The main groups of DEGs were shared among lines; however, A. brama and R. rutilus differed in some of the top gene ontology (GO) terms. DEG analyses revealed the role of heme binding and erythrocyte differentiation after infection by blood-feeding P. homoion. Two backcross generations shared some of the top GO terms, representing mostly downregulated genes associated with P. homoion infection. KEGG analysis revealed the importance of disease-associated pathways; the majority of them were shared by two backcross generations. Our study revealed the most pronounced DEGs associated with blood-feeding monogeneans in backcross hybrids, potentially (but not exclusively) explainable by hybrid breakdown. The lower DEGs reported in F1 hybrids being less parasitized than backcross hybrids is in line with the hybrid advantage.