1
|
Burton-Fisher W, Gordon K. Holding the hope? Therapist and client perspectives on long COVID recovery: A Q-methodology. Br J Health Psychol 2024; 29:746-770. [PMID: 38735864 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Long COVID is a global health concern which has debilitating effects on the individual experiencing it. In the United Kingdom, psychological therapies are being offered to people with long COVID, although the evidence for these therapies is yet to be demonstrated. This research aimed to understand how therapists and clients define and understand recovery from long COVID, and use hope theory to interpret the results. METHODS An online Q-methodology was employed, where participants sorted a range of statements pertaining to long COVID recovery based on their level of agreement with them. These arranged statements (Q-sorts) were collated and factor analysed to explore and compare underlying perspectives. RESULTS Sixteen participants were recruited for the study, including eleven clients, four IAPT therapists and one therapist working in the broader long COVID pathway. A four-factor model is reported, including (1) Psychological Pathways to Recovery, (2) Social Context and Agency, (3) Physiological Goals of Recovery and (4) Personal Meaning Making. All IAPT therapists loaded onto the psychological pathways factor, whereas the remaining participants shared more diverse perspectives. CONCLUSIONS The belief that long COVID recovery was possible, taken as an indicator of hopefulness, was rated highest for Factor 1, Psychological Pathways to Recovery, and Factor 3, Physiological Recovery Goals. This suggested that having a clear definition of recovery, or clear guidance on how to intervene, promoted hopefulness and, theoretically, well-being. However, clients reported experiences of being invalidated and disbelieved by health professionals, with psychological explanations sometimes being experienced as dismissive and invalidating. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim Gordon
- Professional Doctorate in Clinical Psychology, Staffordshire University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gould RL, McDermott CJ, Thompson BJ, Rawlinson CV, Bursnall M, Bradburn M, Kumar P, Turton EJ, White DA, Serfaty MA, Graham CD, McCracken LM, Goldstein LH, Al-Chalabi A, Orrell RW, Williams T, Noad R, Baker I, Faull C, Lambert T, Chhetri SK, Ealing J, Hanratty A, Radunovic A, Gunawardana N, Meadows G, Gorrie GH, Young T, Lawrence V, Cooper C, Shaw PJ, Howard RJ. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy plus usual care for improving quality of life in people with motor neuron disease (COMMEND): a multicentre, parallel, randomised controlled trial in the UK. Lancet 2024; 403:2381-2394. [PMID: 38735299 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00533-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Motor neuron disease is a progressive, fatal neurodegenerative disease for which there is no cure. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a psychological therapy incorporating acceptance, mindfulness, and behaviour change techniques. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ACT plus usual care, compared with usual care alone, for improving quality of life in people with motor neuron disease. METHODS We conducted a parallel, multicentre, two-arm randomised controlled trial in 16 UK motor neuron disease care centres or clinics. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of definite or laboratory-supported probable, clinically probable, or possible familial or sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; progressive muscular atrophy; or primary lateral sclerosis; which met the World Federation of Neurology's El Escorial diagnostic criteria. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive up to eight sessions of ACT adapted for people with motor neuron disease plus usual care or usual care alone by a web-based system, stratified by site. Participants were followed up at 6 months and 9 months post-randomisation. Outcome assessors and trial statisticians were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was quality of life using the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (MQOL-R) at 6 months post-randomisation. Primary analyses were multi-level modelling and modified intention to treat among participants with available data. This trial was pre-registered with the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN12655391). FINDINGS Between Sept 18, 2019, and Aug 31, 2022, 435 people with motor neuron disease were approached for the study, of whom 206 (47%) were assessed for eligibility, and 191 were recruited. 97 (51%) participants were randomly assigned to ACT plus usual care and 94 (49%) were assigned to usual care alone. 80 (42%) of 191 participants were female and 111 (58%) were male, and the mean age was 63·1 years (SD 11·0). 155 (81%) participants had primary outcome data at 6 months post-randomisation. After controlling for baseline scores, age, sex, and therapist clustering, ACT plus usual care was superior to usual care alone for quality of life at 6 months (adjusted mean difference on the MQOL-R of 0·66 [95% CI 0·22-1·10]; d=0·46 [0·16-0·77]; p=0·0031). Moderate effect sizes were clinically meaningful. 75 adverse events were reported, 38 of which were serious, but no adverse events were deemed to be associated with the intervention. INTERPRETATION ACT plus usual care is clinically effective for maintaining or improving quality of life in people with motor neuron disease. As further evidence emerges confirming these findings, health-care providers should consider how access to ACT, adapted for the specific needs of people with motor neuron disease, could be provided within motor neuron disease clinical services. FUNDING National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment and Motor Neurone Disease Association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Gould
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Christopher J McDermott
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, and the NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Matt Bursnall
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Pavithra Kumar
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Emily J Turton
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - David A White
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marc A Serfaty
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Priory Hospital North London, London, UK
| | - Christopher D Graham
- Department of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Laura H Goldstein
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ammar Al-Chalabi
- Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Richard W Orrell
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tim Williams
- The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Rupert Noad
- Department of Neuropsychology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | - Idris Baker
- Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, UK
| | | | - Thomas Lambert
- Department of Neurosciences, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Suresh K Chhetri
- Regional Neurosciences Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - John Ealing
- Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust, Salford, UK
| | | | | | - Nushan Gunawardana
- Department of Neurology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Gail Meadows
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust, Grimsby, UK
| | - George H Gorrie
- Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Tracey Young
- Division of Population Health, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Vanessa Lawrence
- Health Services & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Cindy Cooper
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Pamela J Shaw
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, and the NIHR Sheffield Biomedical Research Centre, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Robert J Howard
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petri S. Acceptance and commitment therapy in improving quality of life in motor neuron disease. Lancet 2024; 403:2350-2351. [PMID: 38735297 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00753-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Petri
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover 30625, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murray R, Donnelly CM, Drescher KD, Graham CD. The lived experience of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy: A systematic review and synthesis of the qualitative literature. Muscle Nerve 2024; 69:7-17. [PMID: 37691606 DOI: 10.1002/mus.27964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In this review we sought to characterize the lived experience of people living with FSHD (pwFSHD) to help clinicians to orient their services to the needs of these individuals. METHODS Five electronic databases were systematically searched for qualitative research studies containing quotations from pwFSHD. ENhancing Transparency in REporting the Synthesis of Qualitative research and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines informed the methodology. Study quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Checklist tool, which measures the methodological quality of qualitative research. Data extracted from included studies were analyzed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS Ninety-nine pwFSHD took part in the six studies included in this review - from research teams based in two countries. Five descriptive themes emerged: "Engaging with life as symptoms progress"; "The emotional journey"; "A family burden to bear"; "Social connection and disconnection"; and "Tension between visibility and invisibility." From these, two analytical themes were derived: "The emotional challenge of continuing and intensifying adaptation" and "The relational burden of rare disease." DISCUSSION The lived experience of pwFSHD is characterized by physical, emotional, and social challenges that impact on engagement with life, particularly as symptoms progress. Further research is needed to provide a fuller understanding of the experience of pain in FSHD and of the lived experience of FSHD across cultures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roisin Murray
- Psychology Service for Older People, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK
| | - Clare M Donnelly
- Psychological Therapies Service, Northern Health and Social Care Trust, Antrim, UK
| | - Kent D Drescher
- National Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Christopher D Graham
- Psychology Service for Older People, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Edwards V, Vari C, Rose M, Graham CD, O'Connell N, Taylor E, McCracken LM, Radunovic A, Rakowicz W, Norton S, Chalder T. Participant experiences of guided self-help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for improving quality of life in muscle disease: a nested qualitative study within the ACTMus randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1233526. [PMID: 38106380 PMCID: PMC10722278 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1233526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction In adults, muscle disease (MD) is typically a chronic long-term condition that can lead to a reduced quality of life (QoL). Previous research suggests that a psychological intervention, in particular Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), may help improve QoL for individuals living with chronic conditions such as MD. Methods This nested qualitative study was incorporated within a randomized controlled trial which evaluated a guided self-help ACT intervention for people living with MD to explore their experiences of the intervention. Semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were conducted with those who had received ACT. Data were analyzed via thematic analysis. Results There were four overarching themes. (1) Views on whether therapy sessions would help with a medical condition: participants' expectations regarding ACT varied. Some participants were skeptical about mindfulness. (2) I was able to look at things in a different way: participants described increased meaningful activity, greater awareness of thoughts and emotions and acceptance or adaptation to mobility problems. Some described improvement in the quality of relationships and a sense of feeling free. (3) Treating the body and the mind together: following the intervention participants noted that a holistic approach to healthcare is beneficial. (4) Intervention delivery: The remote delivery was generally seen as helpful for practical reasons and allowed participants to speak openly. Participants voiced a need for follow-up sessions. Discussion Overall, the intervention was experienced as acceptable. Suggested improvements included de-emphasizing the role of mindfulness and adding follow-up sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Edwards
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Chiara Vari
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Rose
- Department of Neurology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher D. Graham
- School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola O'Connell
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Taylor
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Wojtek Rakowicz
- Wessex Neurological Service, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Norton
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Inflammation Biology, Centre for Rheumatic Disease, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Trudie Chalder
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gould RL, Rawlinson C, Thompson B, Weeks K, Gossage-Worrall R, Cantrill H, Serfaty MA, Graham CD, McCracken LM, White D, Howard RJ, Bursnall M, Bradburn M, Al-Chalabi A, Orrell R, Chhetri SK, Noad R, Radunovic A, Williams T, Young CA, Dick D, Lawrence V, Goldstein LH, Young T, Ealing J, McLeod H, Williams N, Weatherly H, Cave R, Chiwera T, Pagnini F, Cooper C, Shaw PJ, McDermott CJ. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for people living with motor neuron disease: an uncontrolled feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2023; 9:116. [PMID: 37420261 PMCID: PMC10327371 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01354-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Motor neuron disease (MND) is a fatal, progressive neurodegenerative disease that causes progressive weakening and wasting of limb, bulbar, thoracic and abdominal muscles. Clear evidence-based guidance on how psychological distress should be managed in people living with MND (plwMND) is lacking. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a form of psychological therapy that may be particularly suitable for this population. However, to the authors' knowledge, no study to date has evaluated ACT for plwMND. Consequently, the primary aim of this uncontrolled feasibility study was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of ACT for improving the psychological health of plwMND. METHODS PlwMND aged ≥ 18 years were recruited from 10 UK MND Care Centres/Clinics. Participants received up to 8 one-to-one ACT sessions, developed specifically for plwMND, plus usual care. Co-primary feasibility and acceptability outcomes were uptake (≥ 80% of the target sample [N = 28] recruited) and initial engagement with the intervention (≥ 70% completing ≥ 2 sessions). Secondary outcomes included measures of quality of life, anxiety, depression, disease-related functioning, health status and psychological flexibility in plwMND and quality of life and burden in caregivers. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS Both a priori indicators of success were met: 29 plwMND (104%) were recruited and 76% (22/29) attended ≥ 2 sessions. Attrition at 6-months was higher than anticipated (8/29, 28%), but only two dropouts were due to lack of acceptability of the intervention. Acceptability was further supported by good satisfaction with therapy and session attendance. Data were possibly suggestive of small improvements in anxiety and psychological quality of life from baseline to 6 months in plwMND, despite a small but expected deterioration in disease-related functioning and health status. CONCLUSIONS There was good evidence of acceptability and feasibility. Limitations included the lack of a control group and small sample size, which complicate interpretation of findings. A fully powered RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of ACT for plwMND is underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study was pre-registered with the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN12655391).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Gould
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
| | - Charlotte Rawlinson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Ben Thompson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Kirsty Weeks
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Rebecca Gossage-Worrall
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hannah Cantrill
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Marc A Serfaty
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7NF, UK
- Priory Hospital North London, London, UK
| | - Christopher D Graham
- Strathclyde Psychology, Department of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - David White
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Robert J Howard
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Wing B, 6th Floor Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Matt Bursnall
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ammar Al-Chalabi
- Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Orrell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Suresh K Chhetri
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Lancashire, UK
| | - Rupert Noad
- Department of Neuropsychology, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Tim Williams
- The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - David Dick
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Vanessa Lawrence
- Health Services & Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Laura H Goldstein
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Tracey Young
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Ealing
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Hamish McLeod
- Mental Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Nicola Williams
- Primary Care Clinical Trials Unit, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Richard Cave
- Language and Cognition, University College London, London, UK
| | - Theresa Chiwera
- Maurice Wohl Clinical Neuroscience Institute, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Francesco Pagnini
- Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy
| | - Cindy Cooper
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Pamela J Shaw
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pater R, Garmendia J, Gallais B, Graham C, Voet N. 267th ENMC International workshop: psychological interventions for improving quality of life in slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders. Neuromuscul Disord 2023; 33:562-569. [PMID: 37331200 DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2023.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
This workshop aimed to develop recommendations for psychological interventions to support people living with slowly progressive neuromuscular disorders (NMD). The workshop comprised clinicians, researchers, people living with NMD and their relatives. First, participants considered the key psychological challenges presented by NMD and the impact of NMD on relationships and mental health. Later, several psychological approaches for enhancing well-being in NMD were described. The results of randomised controlled trials of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for improving fatigue, quality of life, and mood in adults with NMD were examined. Then the group considered ways to adapt therapies for cognitive impairments or neurodevelopmental differences that occur in some NMD, alongside ways to support children and adolescents with NMD and their family members. Based on the evidence from randomised controlled trials, carefully conducted observational studies, and the coherence of these data with the experience of those living with NMD, the group recommends that psychological interventions should be embedded in the routine clinical care offered to people living with NMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronne Pater
- Klimmendaal, Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Joana Garmendia
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology and Research Methodology; Psychology Faculty, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain
| | - Benjamin Gallais
- ÉCOBES - Research and Transfer, Cegep de Jonquière, Jonquière, Canada
| | | | - Nicoline Voet
- Klimmendaal, Rehabilitation Center, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Smith SG, Green SMC, Ellison R, Foy R, Graham CD, Mason E, French DP, Hall LH, Wilkes H, McNaught E, Raine E, Walwyn R, Howdon D, Clark J, Rousseau N, Buxton J, Moore SJL, Parbutt C, Velikova G, Farrin A, Collinson M. Refining and optimising a behavioural intervention to support endocrine therapy adherence (ROSETA) in UK women with breast cancer: protocol for a pilot fractional factorial trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069971. [PMID: 36737093 PMCID: PMC9900066 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Women with breast cancer who do not adhere to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) have increased risks of mortality and recurrence. There are multiple barriers to AET adherence, including medication side-effects, beliefs about medication, memory and psychological distress. We developed four intervention components, each targeting a different barrier. This pilot trial is part of the preparation phase of the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy, and aims to establish key trial parameters, establish intervention component adherence, establish availability and feasibility of outcome and process data, estimate variability in planned outcome measures and estimate cost of developing and delivering each intervention component. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The four intervention components are as follows: short message service text reminders (target: memory); a written information leaflet (target: medication beliefs); a guided self-help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy programme (target: psychological flexibility to reduce distress) and a self-management website (target: side-effect management). To evaluate the feasibility of recruitment, acceptability of the intervention components and the availability of outcome data, we will conduct a multisite, exploratory pilot trial using a 24-1 fractional factorial design, with a nested process evaluation. We will randomise 80 women with early-stage breast cancer who have been prescribed AET to one of eight experimental conditions. This will determine the combination of intervention components they receive, ranging from zero to four, with all conditions receiving usual care. Key outcomes of interest include medication adherence and quality of life. Progression to the optimisation phase will be based on predefined criteria for consent rates, patient adherence to intervention components and availability of medication adherence data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study was reviewed by the Wales Research Authority Research Ethics Committee 3 (21/WA/0322). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before randomisation. The results of this trial will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRTCN10487576.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel G Smith
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sophie M C Green
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachel Ellison
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Ellen Mason
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David P French
- School of Psychological Sciences, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Louise H Hall
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Hollie Wilkes
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Emma McNaught
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Erin Raine
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rebecca Walwyn
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Daniel Howdon
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jane Clark
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Surgical, Diagnostic and Devices Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Jacqueline Buxton
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally J L Moore
- Academic Unit of Primary Care, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- Medicines Management and Pharmacy Services, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Michelle Collinson
- Complex Interventions Division, Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Green SMC, French DP, Graham CD, Hall LH, Rousseau N, Foy R, Clark J, Parbutt C, Raine E, Gardner B, Velikova G, Moore SJL, Buxton J, Smith SG. Supporting adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence in women with breast cancer: the development of a complex behavioural intervention using Intervention Mapping guided by the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy. BMC Health Serv Res 2022; 22:1081. [PMID: 36002831 PMCID: PMC9404670 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08243-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence and mortality. However, up to three-quarters of women with breast cancer do not take AET as prescribed. Existing interventions to support adherence to AET have largely been unsuccessful, and have not focused on the most salient barriers to adherence. This paper describes the process of developing four theory-based intervention components to support adherence to AET. Our aim is to provide an exemplar of intervention development using Intervention Mapping (IM) with guidance from the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST). METHODS Iterative development followed the six-stage IM framework with stakeholder involvement. Stage 1 involved a literature review of barriers to adherence and existing interventions, which informed the intervention objectives outlined in Stage 2. Stage 3 identified relevant theoretical considerations and practical strategies for supporting adherence. Stage 4 used information from Stages 1-3 to develop the intervention components. Stages 1-4 informed a conceptual model for the intervention package. Stages 5 and 6 detailed implementation considerations and evaluation plans for the intervention package, respectively. RESULTS The final intervention package comprised four individual intervention components: Short Message Service to encourage habitual behaviours surrounding medication taking; an information leaflet to target unhelpful beliefs about AET; remotely delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-based guided self-help to reduce psychological distress; and a website to support self-management of AET side-effects. Considerations for implementation within the NHS, including cost, timing and mode of delivery were outlined, with explanation as to how using MOST can aid this. We detail our plans for the final stage of IM which involve feasibility testing. This involved planning an external exploratory pilot trial using a 24-1 fractional factorial design, and a process evaluation to assess acceptability and fidelity of intervention components. CONCLUSIONS We have described a systematic and logical approach for developing a theoretically informed intervention package to support medication adherence in women with breast cancer using AET. Further research to optimise the intervention package, guided by MOST, has the potential to lead to more effective, efficient and scalable interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie M C Green
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Louise H Hall
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Nikki Rousseau
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Robbie Foy
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Jane Clark
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Parbutt
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Erin Raine
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Benjamin Gardner
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally J L Moore
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Jacqueline Buxton
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Samuel G Smith
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9NL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|