If sex differences in brain lateralization exist, they have yet to be discovered

Sex differences in EEG coherence in normal children

The idea that sex differences in the execution of different mental tasks mean a different cerebral organization met contradictory results. Sex differences in brain electrical activity were reported by various authors. The EEG coherences show functional and anatomical interrelation, so they may reveal differences in brain organization. This paper tries to demonstrate how sex differences are manifested in EEG coherences, in 42 right-handed control children, 18 girls and 24 boys, aged 7.6 to 13.3. Since the effect of age is high on EEG measurements, regression against age was calculated and eliminated. The Z-transformed coherence values were compared by Student's t-test. The results obtained showed that girls had higher right intrahemispheric coherence values than boys in all bands. These sex differences were more numerous in the theta band. The interhemispheric differences were slight and girls had higher coherences in all bands except for the alpha band, where boys had higher interhemispheric coherence than girls. These results show slight but consistent differences in the functional organization of the right hemisphere by sex and reveal the necessity to elaborate separated EEG norms for boys and girls.

Women who excel on a spatial task: proposed genetic and environmental factors

A "bent twig" model which incorporates Annett's genetic handedness theory with an environmental component predicted characteristics of college women likely to excel on a mental rotation task. Those likely to have the necessary combination of genetic potential and prior experiences are right-handed women with non-right-handed relatives who rate themselves high in spatial experiences. This subgroup significantly outperformed all other groups of right-handed women on the Vandenberg Mental Rotation Test. This study provides support for the view that family handedness and spatial experiences are important factors influencing mental rotation ability in women.

An anomalous sex difference in auditory laterality

Eighty right-handed adults (40 females, 40 males) performed a task that entailed detecting and localizing targets within series of dichotic digit names. Analysis of sensitivity scores for each ear revealed an overall right-ear advantage (REA). However, a significant Sex x Ear interaction showed that the degree of asymmetry was greater among females than among males. This sex difference, which is opposite to that previously reported in some dichotic listening studies, contradicts the conclusion that language processing is more completely lateralized in males than in females.

The effect of head turn on auditory asymmetry

In two experiments, right-handed men and women were tested for ear differences in report of dichotically presented digits, with their heads straight ahead, turned 90 degrees to the left, and turned 90 degrees to the right. In Experiment 1, head turn was controlled simply by asking the subjects to fixate an appropriately located point; a right-ear advantage occurred under all conditions of head turn among the men, but only in the head-straight condition among the women. In Experiment 2, head turn was controlled by having the subjects direct a flashlight attached to their heads toward the fixation point. This eliminated the right-ear advantage under all head conditions for the men, but for the women the right-ear advantage was, if anything, more pronounced when their heads were turned than when straight. These results suggest that auditory asymmetry depends in part on whether space is perceived as divided into left and right sides, and in part of the balance between spatial and verbal requirements. Both factors, and the asymmetry itself, may interact with sex.

Sex differences in brain organization: implications for human communication

This article reviews current knowledge in two major research domains: sex differences in neuropsychophysiology, and in human communication. An attempt was made to integrate knowledge from several areas of brain research with human communication and to clarify how such a cooperative effort may be beneficial to both fields of study. By combining findings from the area of brain research, a communication paradigm was developed which contends that brain-related sex differences may reside largely in the area of communication of emotion.

Individual use of judgmental dimensions and hemispheric specificity

The present study investigated the relationship of hemispheric functional specificity to a subject's use of judgmental dimensions when discriminating temporal and spatial visual stimuli using a multidimensional scaling (MDS) paired-comparison paradigm. The major purposes of the study were: To identify the judgmental dimensions used in discriminating unidimensional (temporal or spatial) and multidimensional (combinations of temporal and spatial parameters) stimuli presented to the two visual hemifields; to study the relationship of the use of judgmental dimensions to the visual hemifields; to investigate whether the use of judgmental dimensions in discriminating unidimensional stimuli can be used to predict their use in discriminating multidimensional stimuli. Subjects used two dimensions in discriminating the spatial and temporal unidimensional stimuli: A dimension whose scaling paralleled the physically interval-scaled stimuli; a dimension, in which the extreme values were located on one end of the scale, while the mid-values are located at the other end of the scale. There is significantly greater use of the spatial dimension when spatial stimuli are presented to the left visual field (LVF) then when presented to the right visual field (RVF). Conversely, there is significantly greater use of the temporal dimension when temporal stimuli are presented to the RVF then when they are presented to the LVF. Three perceptual dimensions were used to judge multidimensional stimuli: Spatial-to-temporal; stimulus quality; apparent movement. Two groups of subjects were identified who differed in their relative use of the temporally and spatially scaled unidimensional stimuli presented to the RVF. These two groups differed with respect to their relative use of a spatial-to-temporal dimension when multidimensional stimuli were presented to the RVF.

Relationships between speed, accuracy of performance and hemispheric superiorities for visuo-spatial pattern processing in the two sexes

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between visual field differences in tachistoscopic recognition of visuo-spatial patterns and overall proficiency in the two sexes. The results demonstrated a left visual field advantage in males but not in females. A female subgroup showed opposite rather than lacking visual field superiorities without affecting speed and accuracy of performance. These data warn against explaining differences in performance in the two sexes in terms of different hemispheric asymmetries.

An evaluation of evidence for innate sex differences in linguistic ability

A female superiority in verbal ability is reported on many tests. It has been hypothesized that the female brain is more functionally symmetrical for language then the male, and that this is the cause of the alleged superiority. Recent research has suggested that factors other than sex are involved: handedness, age of maturity, and endocrine influences. It is not yet clear whether, despite its biological correlates, the female superiority is innate.