1
|
Garcia Gonzalez-Moral S, Beyer FR, Oyewole AO, Richmond C, Wainwright L, Craig D. Looking at the fringes of MedTech innovation: a mapping review of horizon scanning and foresight methods. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073730. [PMID: 37709340 PMCID: PMC10503360 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Horizon scanning (HS) is a method used to examine signs of change and may be used in foresight practice. HS methods used for the identification of innovative medicinal products cannot be applied in medical technologies (MedTech) due to differences in development and regulatory processes. The aim of this study is to identify HS and other methodologies used for MedTech foresight in support to healthcare decision-making. METHOD A mapping review was performed. We searched bibliographical databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore and Compendex Engineering Village and grey literature sources such as Google, CORE database and the International HTA database. Our searches identified 8888 records. After de-duplication, and manual and automated title, abstracts and full-text screening, 49 papers met the inclusion criteria and were data extracted. RESULTS Twenty-five single different methods were identified, often used in combination; of these, only three were novel (appearing only once in the literature). Text mining or artificial intelligence solutions appear as early as 2012, often practised in patent and social media sources. The time horizon used in scanning was not often justified. Some studies regarded experts both as a source and as a method. Literature searching remains one of the most used methods for innovation identification. HS methods were vaguely reported, but often involved consulting with experts and stakeholders. CONCLUSION Heterogeneous methodologies, sources and time horizons are used for HS and foresight of MedTech innovation with little or no justification provided for their use. This review revealed an array of known methods being used in combination to overcome the limitations posed by single methods. The review also revealed inconsistency in methods reporting, with a lack of any consensus regarding best practice. Greater transparency in methods reporting and consistency in methods use would contribute to increased output quality to support informed timely decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Garcia Gonzalez-Moral
- NIHR Innovation Observatory at Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Fiona R Beyer
- NIHR Innovation Observatory at Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Anne O Oyewole
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Catherine Richmond
- NIHR Innovation Observatory at Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Luke Wainwright
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- NIHR Innovation Observatory at Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hines P, Hiu Yu L, Guy RH, Brand A, Papaluca-Amati M. Scanning the horizon: a systematic literature review of methodologies. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026764. [PMID: 31133588 PMCID: PMC6549743 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Society is confronted with the rapid emergence of innovation in science and technology. To manage this, horizon scanning is being adopted globally to identify, assess and prioritise innovations and trends at an early stage of their development. This enables decision-makers to be better informed and to prepare for change. The aim of this paper is to systematically identify and evaluate horizon scanning methodologies employed in the healthcare and biomedical fields. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed using PubMed and Embase and was supplemented with grey literature searches (2008-2018). The principal methodologies used in horizon scanning were extracted. RESULTS Approximately 100 articles were summarised in a literature map. The search revealed many examples of horizon scanning across disciplines. Challenges, such as the need to refine prioritisation criteria, manage uncertainty inherent in the findings and improve the dissemination of identified issues, have been highlighted. CONCLUSION Horizon scanning, when performed appropriately, is a flexible and potentially reliable tool, with a wide variety of methods. Horizon scanning can inform and influence decision-making, through identifying opportunities and challenges, from an organisational to an international level. Further research to identify the most effective methodologies available would add depth to this landscape and enable the evolution of best practice to most efficiently anticipate novel developments and innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Hines
- Scientific Committees Regulatory Science Strategy, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- UNU-MERIT, United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of International Health, Faculty ofHealth, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHLM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Li Hiu Yu
- Scientific Committees Regulatory Science Strategy, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of International Health, Faculty ofHealth, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHLM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Richard H Guy
- Scientific Committees Regulatory Science Strategy, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Angela Brand
- UNU-MERIT, United Nations University-Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of International Health, Faculty ofHealth, Medicine and Life Sciences (FHLM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marisa Papaluca-Amati
- Scientific Committees Regulatory Science Strategy, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
EARLY AWARENESS AND ALERT ACTIVITIES IN LATIN AMERICA: CURRENT SITUATION IN FOUR COUNTRIES. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28:315-20. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462312000311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to briefly describe the current state of early awareness and alert (EAA) activities and systems in four Latin-American countries (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico).Methods: Key informants were selected and completed an open questionnaire that included the following domains: current state of EAA activities and systems in each country, potential role for EAA systems in the health system, and future EAA projects that are currently being considered.Results: In all four countries, health technology assessment (HTA) processes are used to prioritize the use of health resources, albeit at varying degrees and with different mechanisms and methodologies. EAA activities are still limited and there are virtually no institutions or units with specific functions explicitly devoted to EAA activity. However, most countries have developed some initial forms of EAA systems. Being in its initial stages there is no clear differentiation between these early awareness activities and other HTA functions, and no specific methodologies or processes are used to anticipate the emergence of new technologies. Consequently, early evaluation of technologies generally occurs in a reactive manner, after they have been introduced in the market and under the pressure of different stakeholders.Conclusions: There is growing awareness that the early identification and assessment of emerging technologies should be an integral part of HTA and the decision-making process. Many initiatives are currently focusing on building partnerships between the various regulatory bodies involved in the incorporation of technologies at national levels. It is reasonable to foresee that EAA activities will continue to develop and expand in the region.
Collapse
|
4
|
ANALYZING 10 YEARS OF EARLY AWARENESS AND ALERT ACTIVITY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2012; 28:308-14. [DOI: 10.1017/s026646231200030x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of the English National Horizon Scanning Centre (NHSC) in identifying and filtering pharmaceutical developments using end user and international collaborator databases of emerging technologies as proxies for new drugs of likely significance to health services and/or patients.Methods: We used the NHSC information system and the list of National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) technology appraisals to estimate the false positive rate for NHSC identification, filtration, and reporting. We assessed the sensitivity of NHSC identification and filtration of pharmaceuticals for NICE technology appraisals from 1999 to the end of December 2010, and for pharmaceuticals entered into the EuroScan International Network database.Results: We estimate that overall NHSC identification, filtration and reporting had a positive predictive value of 0.39 (95 percent CI, 0.36 to 0.43) and a false positive rate of 60 percent. Using NICE appraisals and EuroScan's database as proxies for pharmaceuticals of significance, we estimate the NHSC sensitivity over the 10-year period at 0.92 (95 percent CI, 0.89 to 0.95) and 0.89 (95 percent CI, 0.82 to 0.96) respectively.Conclusions: Our results suggest that the NHSC has performed well in terms of sensitivity over the past decade, but that the false positive rate of 60 percent may indicate that the filtration criteria for pharmaceuticals could be tightened for increased efficiency. Future evaluations of EAA systems should include an element of external review and explore the level of accuracy acceptable to funders and customers of such systems.
Collapse
|
5
|
Sennfält K, Carlsson P, Varenhorst E. Diffusion and Economic Consequences of Health Technologies in Prostate Cancer Care in Sweden, 1991–2002. Eur Urol 2006; 49:1028-34. [PMID: 16417962 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2005] [Accepted: 12/12/2005] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the diffusion of six main health technologies used for management of prostate cancer, to estimate the economic consequences of technological changes, and to explore factors behind the diffusion. METHODS Data describing the diffusion 1991-2002 were obtained from population-based databases. Costs were obtained from Linköping University Hospital and Apoteket AB. Factors affecting the diffusion of the technologies were explored. RESULTS Utilization of technologies with a curative and/or palliative aim has increased over time, except for surgical castration. PSA-tests are used increasingly. The total cost of the study technologies has increased from 20 million euros in 1991 to 65 million euros in 2002. Classification of radical prostatectomy revealed a profile associated with a slow/limited diffusion, while classification of PSA-tests revealed a profile associated with a rapid/extensive diffusion. CONCLUSIONS Several technological changes in the management of prostate cancer have occurred without proven benefits and have contributed to increased costs. There are other factors, besides scientific evidence, that have an impact on the diffusion. Consequently, activities aimed at facilitating an appropriate diffusion of new technologies are needed. The analytical framework used here may be helpful in identifying technologies that are likely to experience inappropriate diffusion and therefore need particular attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Sennfält
- Center for Medical Technology Assessment, Linköping University, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taylor R. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: government agency perspective. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2001; 19 Suppl 2:33-38. [PMID: 11700787 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119002-00006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
In the developed world, the demand for healthcare is rising faster than supply, so that governments are faced with the need to allocate limited resources for maximum benefit. Many governments are responding to these pressures by developing health technology assessment agencies, which evaluate the cost effectiveness of new pharmaceutical and medical products relative to existing interventions. In England and Wales, the agency concerned with health technology assessment is the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE brings together evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness to judge the value of the treatment relative to alternative uses of National Health Service (NHS) resources and makes recommendations on use of the treatment by the NHS in England and Wales. NICE evaluates technologies where they may result in significant impact on NHS resources or key healthcare policy. The health technology assessment includes a review of the clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and service impact of the technology under consideration. This health technology assessment report, together with submissions from the technology manufacturer, and patient and healthcare professionals groups, is then considered by an appraisal committee that formulates guidance to the NHS and is ultimately published by NICE. A number of countries have formal guidelines on the use of outcome measures and economic evaluations in the submissions required for health technology assessment prior to market access. These guidelines vary in both the detail and level of mandatory requirement to be followed by technology manufacturers. NICE has recently updated its guidance to technology manufacturers on their submissions. These guidelines, developed in consultation with the healthcare industry, provide detailed specification of the requirements of NICE for health outcomes data and economic evaluation. These details are described in more detail in this paper.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Taylor
- Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, England
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Keech M. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: a pharmaceutical industry perspective. PHARMACOECONOMICS 2001; 19 Suppl 2:27-31. [PMID: 11700786 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200119002-00005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Within the pharmaceutical industry, there is increasing interest in collecting health outcomes data in order to inform decision-making, both internally and externally. The overall aim of generating the health outcomes information is to determine the value of the product, from the perspective of all the stakeholders. In addition to studies carried out during phase II and III of clinical development, pharmaceutical companies have recently begun to collect health outcomes information earlier, with the expected requirements for reimbursement and market access considered during the preclinical and phase I stages. However, there are a number of challenges to the demonstration of product value during drug development, particularly relating to the limitations of clinical trials. One way that pharmaceutical companies are addressing these challenges is through the use of economic modelling, to provide a framework to test assumptions and assess uncertainty, and examine the budget impact of treatments. Although different countries may use the information differently, health outcomes evidence generated by the pharmaceutical industry is generally used to inform decision-making about pricing, reimbursement, treatment guidelines and inclusion of drugs on formularies. A wide variety of health outcomes information is produced by the industry in order to provide data on product value that are appropriate for the different perspectives of the stakeholders in the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Keech
- Global Health Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, Middlesex, England
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jørgensen T, Larsen LG. Basis for decisions on emerging health technology. A Danish feasibility study. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1999; 14:624-35. [PMID: 9885452 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300011934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of the feasibility study were to evaluate sources of information for an eventual Danish system for early identification and assessment of emerging health technology, to identify potential users of the system, and to clarify their specific need for information concerning emerging health technology. The methods used were questionnaires to informants within and outside the health services and to decision makers on different levels in the health services, and follow-up telephone interviews. Our study reveals a strong, and to some extent unsatisfied, need among policy makers, planners, and managers in the Danish health services for information concerning emerging health technology. The requested information should in particular concern indication for use, number of patients affected, clinical effectiveness and side effects, running cost, and investments. The time horizon most relevant to the decision makers seems to be only zero to 2 years. Furthermore, we found that numerous sources are available that frequently display information on emerging technology important to the health services. The challenges seem to be to select information of sufficient importance and quality, and to combine information, since very few, if any, single primary sources cover all the requested information. In conclusion, we recommend the establishment of a Danish national system for early identification and assessment of emerging health technology, consisting of a small secretariat that collaborates nationally and internationally, the latter in particular on identification of technology and on development of methods for early assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Jørgensen
- Danish Institute for Health Services Research and Development (DSI)
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jørgensen T, Carlsson P. Introduction. Early identification and assessment of emerging health technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1999; 14:603-6. [PMID: 9925451 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300011909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Jørgensen
- Danish Institute for Health Services Research and Development
| | | |
Collapse
|