1
|
Collins KE, Myers LS, Goodwin BC, Taglieri-Sclocchi A, Ireland MJ. The implementation and mechanisms of advance notification for cancer screening: A scoping review. Psychooncology 2024; 33:e6340. [PMID: 38588033 DOI: 10.1002/pon.6340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe and synthesise information on the content and delivery of advance notifications (information about cancer screening delivered prior to invitation) used to increase cancer screening participation and to understand the mechanisms that may underlie their effectiveness. METHODS Searches related to advance notification and cancer screening were conducted in six electronic databases (APA PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science) and results were screened for eligibility. Study characteristics, features of the advance notifications (cancer type, format, delivery time, and content), and the effect of the notifications on cancer screening participation were extracted. Features were summarised and compared across effective versus ineffective notifications. RESULTS Thirty-two articles were included in this review, reporting on 33 unique advance notifications. Of these, 79% were sent via postal mail, 79% were distributed prior to bowel cancer screening, and most were sent 2 weeks before the screening offer. Twenty-two full versions of the advance notifications were obtained for content analysis. Notifications included information about cancer risk, the benefits of screening, barriers to participation, social endorsement of cancer screening, and what to expect throughout the screening process. Of the 19 notifications whose effect was tested statistically, 68% were found to increase screening (by 0.7%-16%). Effectiveness did not differ according to the format, delivery time, or content within the notification, although some differences in cancer type were observed. CONCLUSION Future research should explore the effectiveness of advance notification via alternative formats and for other screening contexts and disentangle the intervention- and person-level factors driving its effect on screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn E Collins
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia
| | - Larry S Myers
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia
| | - Belinda C Goodwin
- Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Queensland, Australia
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia
| | | | - Michael J Ireland
- School of Psychology and Wellbeing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia
- Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith H, Varshoei P, Boushey R, Kuziemsky C. Simulation modeling validity and utility in colorectal cancer screening delivery: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27:908-916. [PMID: 32417894 PMCID: PMC7309251 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to assess the impact and validity of simulation modeling in informing decision making in a complex area of healthcare delivery: colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched 10 electronic databases for English-language articles published between January 1, 2008, and March 1, 2019, that described the development of a simulation model with a focus on average-risk CRC screening delivery. Included articles were reviewed for evidence that the model was validated, and provided real or potential contribution to informed decision making using the GRADE EtD (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Evidence to Decision) framework. RESULTS A total of 43 studies met criteria. The majority used Markov modeling (n = 31 [72%]) and sought to determine cost-effectiveness, compare screening modalities, or assess effectiveness of screening. No study reported full model validation and only (58%) reported conducting any validation. Majority of models were developed to address a specific health systems or policy question; few articles report the model's impact on this decision (n = 39 [91%] vs. n = 5 [12%]). Overall, models provided evidence relevant to every element important to decision makers as outlined in the GRADE EtD framework. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Simulation modeling contributes evidence that is considered valuable to decision making in CRC screening delivery, particularly in assessing cost-effectiveness and comparing screening modalities. However, the actual impact on decisions and validity of models is lacking in the literature. Greater validity testing, impact assessment, and standardized reporting of both is needed to understand and demonstrate the reliability and utility of simulation modeling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Smith
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Peyman Varshoei
- Telfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robin Boushey
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig Kuziemsky
- Office of Research Services, MacEwan University, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sallis A, Sherlock J, Bonus A, Saei A, Gold N, Vlaev I, Chadborn T. Pre-notification and reminder SMS text messages with behaviourally informed invitation letters to improve uptake of NHS Health Checks: a factorial randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1162. [PMID: 31438908 PMCID: PMC6706889 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7476-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The NHS Health Check (NHS HC) is a cardiovascular risk assessment to prevent cardiovascular disease. Public Health England (PHE) wants to increase uptake. METHODS We explored the impact of behaviourally informed invitation letters and pre-notification and reminder SMS on uptake of NHS HCs. Patients at 28 General Practices in the London Borough of Southwark who were eligible to receive an NHS HC between 1st November 2013 and 31st December 2014 were included. A double-blind randomised controlled trial with a mixed 2 (pre-notification SMS - yes or no) × 4 (letter - national template control, open-ended, time-limited, social norm) × 2 (reminder SMS - yes or no) factorial design was used. The open-ended letter used simplification, behavioural instruction and a personalised planning prompt for patients to record the date and time of their NHS HC. The time-limited letter was similar but stated the NHS HC was due in a named forthcoming month. The social norms letter was similar to the open-ended letter but included a descriptive social norms message and testimonials from local residents and no planning prompt. The outcome measure was attendance at an NHS HC. RESULTS Data for 12, 244 invites were analysed. Uptake increased in almost all letter and SMS combinations compared to the control letter without SMS (Uptake 18%), with increases of up to 12 percentage points for the time-limited letter with pre-notification and reminder (Uptake 30%; Adjusted Odds Ratio AOR 1.86; 95% CI 1.45-2.83; p < 0.00); 10 percentage points for the open-ended letter with reminder (Uptake 27%; AOR 1.68; 95% CI 1.31-2.17; p < 0.00) and a 9 percentage point increase using the time-limited letter with reminder (Uptake 27%; AOR 1.61; 95% CI 1.25-2.10; p < 0.00). The reminder SMS increased uptake for all intervention letters. The pre-notification did not add to this effect. CONCLUSIONS This large randomised controlled trial adds support to the evidence that small, low cost behaviourally informed changes to letter-based invitations can increase uptake of NHS HCs. It also provides novel evidence on the effect of SMS reminders and pre-notification on NHS HC attendance. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively Registered (24/01/2014) ISRCTN36027094 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sallis
- PHE Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, 6th Floor, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK
| | - Joseph Sherlock
- Center for Advanced Hindsight, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, 334 Blackwell Street, Suite 320, Durham, North Carolina 27701 USA
- HMRC, 100 Parliament Street, London, SW1A 2BQ England
| | | | - Ayoub Saei
- PHE Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, Public Health England, Colindale Avenue Site, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ UK
| | - Natalie Gold
- PHE Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, 6th Floor, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK
- Faculty of Philosophy, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter 555, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG England
| | - Ivo Vlaev
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Tim Chadborn
- PHE Behavioural Insights, Public Health England, 6th Floor, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8UG UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bowles EJA, Gao H, Brandzel S, Bradford SC, Buist DSM. Comparative effectiveness of two outreach strategies for cervical cancer screening. Prev Med 2016; 86:19-27. [PMID: 26820221 PMCID: PMC4902104 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2015] [Revised: 01/04/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Test-specific reminder letters can improve cancer screening adherence. Little is known about the effectiveness of a reminder system that targets the whole person by including multiple screening recommendations per letter. METHODS We compared the effectiveness of a Pap-specific reminder letter sent 27months after a woman's last Pap, to a reminder letter that included up to seven preventive service recommendations sent before a woman's birthday ("birthday letter") on Pap smear adherence from a natural experiment occurring in routine clinical care. Participants included 82,016 women from Washington State who received 72,615 Pap-specific letters between 2003 and 2007 and 100,218 birthday letters between 2009 and 2012. We defined adherence as having a Pap test within a six month window around the Pap test due date. Using logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) for adherence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) following the birthday letter with 1-2 recommendations, 3-5 recommendations, and 6-7 recommendations compared to the Pap-specific letter. All analyses were stratified by whether a woman was up-to-date or overdue for screening at the time she received a letter. RESULTS Adjusted ORs showed reduced adherence following the birthday letter compared with the Pap-specific letter for up-to-date women whether the letter had 1-2 recommendations (OR=0.37, 95%CI=0.36-0.39), 3-5 recommendations (OR=0.44, 95%CI=0.42-0.45), or 6-7 recommendations (OR=0.36, 95%CI=0.32-0.40). We noted no difference in Pap-test adherence between letter types for overdue women. CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, for women regularly adherent to screening, an annual birthday letter containing reminders for multiple preventive services was less effective at promoting cervical cancer screening compared with a Pap-specific letter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin J Aiello Bowles
- Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.
| | - Hongyuan Gao
- Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Susan Brandzel
- Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| | - Susan Carol Bradford
- Department of Clinical Improvement and Prevention, Group Health Cooperative, 201 16th Ave E, Seattle, WA 98112, USA
| | - Diana S M Buist
- Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Simon-Tuval T, Neumann PJ, Greenberg D. Cost-effectiveness of adherence-enhancing interventions: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2016; 16:67-84. [DOI: 10.1586/14737167.2016.1138858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
6
|
Bradley DT, Treanor C, McMullan C, Owen T, Graham A, Anderson D. Reasons for non-participation in the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008266. [PMID: 26353870 PMCID: PMC4567666 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the reasons why some people do not participate in bowel cancer screening so that steps can be taken to improve informed decision-making. DESIGN Qualitative study, using focus groups with thematic analysis of data to identify, analyse and report patterns. Transcripts were repeatedly read and inductively coded using a phenomenological perspective, and organised into key themes. SETTING Belfast and Armagh, two areas of Northern Ireland with relatively low uptake of bowel cancer screening. PARTICIPANTS Ten women and 18 men in three single-gender focus groups (two male and one female), each with 9-10 participants. Study participants were recruited by convenience sampling from the general public and were eligible for, but had not taken part in, the Northern Ireland Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. RESULTS Key themes identified were fear of cancer; the test procedure; social norms; past experience of cancer and screening; lack of knowledge or understanding about bowel cancer screening; and resulting behaviour towards the test. Fear about receiving bad news and reluctance to conduct the test themselves were reactions that participants seemed willing to overcome after taking part in open discussion about the test. CONCLUSIONS We identified barriers to participation in bowel cancer screening and used these insights to develop new materials to support delivery of the programme. Some of the issues raised have been identified in other UK settings, suggesting that knowledge about barriers, and strategies to improve uptake, may be generalisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Declan T Bradley
- Public Health Agency, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Charlene Treanor
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Senore C, Inadomi J, Segnan N, Bellisario C, Hassan C. Optimising colorectal cancer screening acceptance: a review. Gut 2015; 64:1158-77. [PMID: 26059765 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2014] [Accepted: 03/09/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The study aims to review available evidence concerning effective interventions to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening acceptance. We performed a literature search of randomised trials designed to increase individuals' use of CRC screening on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects. Small (≤ 100 subjects per arm) studies and those reporting results of interventions implemented before publication of the large faecal occult blood test trials were excluded. Interventions were categorised following the Continuum of Cancer Care and the PRECEDE-PROCEED models and studies were grouped by screening model (opportunistic vs organised). Multifactor interventions targeting multiple levels of care and considering factors outside the individual clinician control, represent the most effective strategy to enhance CRC screening acceptance. Removing financial barriers, implementing methods allowing a systematic contact of the whole target population, using personal invitation letters, preferably signed by the reference care provider, and reminders mailed to all non-attendees are highly effective in enhancing CRC screening acceptance. Physician reminders may support the diffusion of screening, but they can be effective only for individuals who have access to and make use of healthcare services. Educational interventions for patients and providers are effective, but the implementation of organisational measures may be necessary to favour their impact. Available evidence indicates that organised programmes allow to achieve an extensive coverage and to enhance equity of access, while maximising the health impact of screening. They provide at the same time an infrastructure allowing to achieve a more favourable cost-effectiveness profile of potentially effective strategies, which would not be sustainable in opportunistic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Senore
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - John Inadomi
- Digestive Disease Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nereo Segnan
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristina Bellisario
- Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO Piemonte), AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Ospedale Nuovo Regina Margherita, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|