1
|
Sapozhnikov J, Albarillo FS, Pulia MS. Optimizing Antimicrobial Stewardship in the Emergency Department. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2024; 42:443-459. [PMID: 38641398 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2024]
Abstract
Antibiotic stewardship is a core component of emergency department (ED) practice and impacts patient safety, clinical outcomes, and public health. The unique characteristics of ED practice, including crowding, time pressure, and diagnostic uncertainty, need to be considered when implementing antibiotic stewardship interventions in this setting. Rapid advances in pathogen detection and host response biomarkers promise to revolutionize the diagnosis of infectious diseases in the ED, but such tests are not yet considered standard of care. Presently, clinical decision support embedded in the electronic health record and pharmacist-led interventions are the most effective ways to improve antibiotic prescribing in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Sapozhnikov
- Medical Science Liaison, Karius Inc, 975 Island Drive, Redwood City, CA 94065, USA
| | - Fritzie S Albarillo
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Diseases Division, Loyola University Medical Center, Loyola University Medical Center is 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA
| | - Michael S Pulia
- BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 800 University Bay Drive, Suite 300, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kasse GE, Humphries J, Cosh SM, Islam MS. Factors contributing to the variation in antibiotic prescribing among primary health care physicians: a systematic review. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:8. [PMID: 38166736 PMCID: PMC10759428 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02223-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic resistance is growing globally. The practice of health professionals when prescribing antibiotics in primary health care settings significantly impacts antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic prescription is a complex process influenced by various internal and external factors. This systematic review aims to summarize the available evidence regarding factors contributing to the variation in antibiotic prescribing among physicians in primary healthcare settings. METHODS This systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA guidelines. We included qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies that examined factors influencing prescription practice and variability among primary healthcare physicians. We excluded editorials, opinions, systematic reviews and studies published in languages other than English. We searched studies from electronic databases: PubMed, ProQuest Health and Medicine, Web Science, and Scopus. The quality of the included studies was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (Version 2018). Narrative synthesis was employed to synthesize the result and incorporate quantitative studies. RESULTS Of the 1816 identified studies, 49 studies spanning 2000-2023 were eligible for review. The factors influencing antibiotic prescription practice and variability were grouped into physician-related, patient-related, and healthcare system-related factors. Clinical guidelines, previous patient experience, physician experience, colleagues' prescribing practice, pharmaceutical pressure, time pressure, and financial considerations were found to be influencing factors of antibiotic prescribing practice. In addition, individual practice patterns, practice volume, and relationship with patients were also other factors for the variability of antibiotic prescription, especially for intra-physician prescription variability. CONCLUSION Antibiotic prescription practice in primary health care is a complex practice, influenced by a combination of different factors and this may account for the variation. To address the factors that influence the variability of antibiotic prescription (intra- and inter-physician), interventions should aim to reduce diagnostic uncertainty and provide continuous medical education and training to promote patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gashaw Enbiyale Kasse
- School of Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, Australia.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, 196, Ethiopia.
| | - Judy Humphries
- School of Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, Australia
| | - Suzanne M Cosh
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, Australia
| | - Md Shahidul Islam
- School of Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New England, Armidale, 2351, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gangathimmaiah V, Drever N, Evans R, Moodley N, Sen Gupta T, Cardona M, Carlisle K. What works for and what hinders deimplementation of low-value care in emergency medicine practice? A scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e072762. [PMID: 37945299 PMCID: PMC10649718 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low-value care can harm patients and healthcare systems. Despite a decade of global endeavours, low value care has persisted. Identification of barriers and enablers is essential for effective deimplementation of low-value care. This scoping review is an evidence summary of barriers, enablers and features of effective interventions for deimplementation of low-value care in emergency medicine practice worldwide. DESIGN A mixed-methods scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. DATA SOURCES Medline, CINAHL, Embase, EMCare, Scopus and grey literature were searched from inception to 5 December 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Primary studies which employed qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods approaches to explore deimplementation of low-value care in an EM setting and reported barriers, enablers or interventions were included. Reviews, protocols, perspectives, comments, opinions, editorials, letters to editors, news articles, books, chapters, policies, guidelines and animal studies were excluded. No language limits were applied. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Study selection, data collection and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Barriers, enablers and interventions were mapped to the domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality assessment. RESULTS The search yielded 167 studies. A majority were quantitative studies (90%, 150/167) that evaluated interventions (86%, 143/167). Limited provider abilities, diagnostic uncertainty, lack of provider insight, time constraints, fear of litigation, and patient expectations were the key barriers. Enablers included leadership commitment, provider engagement, provider training, performance feedback to providers and shared decision-making with patients. Interventions included one or more of the following facets: education, stakeholder engagement, audit and feedback, clinical decision support, nudge, clinical champions and training. Multifaceted interventions were more likely to be effective than single-faceted interventions. Effectiveness of multifaceted interventions was influenced by fidelity of the intervention facets. Use of behavioural change theories such as the Theoretical Domains Framework in the published studies appeared to enhance the effectiveness of interventions to deimplement low-value care. CONCLUSION High-fidelity, multifaceted interventions that incorporated education, stakeholder engagement, audit/feedback and clinical decision support, were administered daily and lasted longer than 1 year were most effective in achieving deimplementation of low-value care in emergency departments. This review contributes the best available evidence to date, but further rigorous, theory-informed, qualitative and mixed-methods studies are needed to supplement the growing body of evidence to effectively deimplement low-value care in emergency medicine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay Gangathimmaiah
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Natalie Drever
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cairns Hospital, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca Evans
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nishila Moodley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tarun Sen Gupta
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Magnolia Cardona
- A/Prof Implementation Science, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Honorary A/Prof of Research Translation, Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Karen Carlisle
- College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rzepka A, Mania A. Positive Point-of-Care Influenza Test Significantly Decreases the Probability of Antibiotic Treatment during Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2031. [PMID: 37370926 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13122031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to analyse clinical and laboratory findings in primary care patients with respiratory tract infections to distinguish the group more likely to receive antibiotic treatment. The study group consisted of 631 patients (264 males; 367 females) with a median age of 48 years (IQR 36-63 years). Analysed groups included patients treated with antibiotics (n = 269 patients; 43%) and those who recovered without antibiotic treatment (n = 362 patients; 57%). Patients receiving antibiotics were older (median 51 vs. 47 years; p = 0.008) and more commonly developed fever (77% vs. 25%, p < 0.0001) and cough (63% vs. 30%; p = 0.0014). Moreover, they more frequently presented wheezing and crackles upon physical examination (28% vs. 4% and 9% vs. 0.3%; p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). They also had more comorbidities and came to more follow-up visits (median of 4 vs. 3 and 2 vs. 1, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Patients receiving symptomatic therapy more often had positive point-of-care tests (POCTS)-20% vs. 7%; p = <0.0001. Multivariate analysis in our cohort found comorbidities complexity (odds ratio-OR 2.62; 95% confidence interval-1.54-4.46), fever (OR 32.59; 95%CI 19.15-55.47), crackles (OR 26.35; 95%CI 2.77-250.81) and the number of visits (OR 4.15; 95%CI 2.39-7.20) as factors increasing the probability of antibiotic treatment. Positive influenza POCTS reduced the risk of antibiotic therapy (OR 0.0015; 95%CI 0.0001-0.0168).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneta Rzepka
- Medicus Primary Health Care Centre, Magdalena Kurnatowska, ul. Starogostyńska 9, 63-800 Gostyń, Poland
| | - Anna Mania
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Child Neurology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-572 Poznań, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poluektova O, Robertson DA, Rafferty A, Cunney R, Lunn PD. A scoping review and behavioural analysis of factors underlying overuse of antimicrobials. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2023; 5:dlad043. [PMID: 37168837 PMCID: PMC10164659 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlad043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Overuse of antimicrobials is a challenging global issue that contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Despite widespread awareness of the problem among members of the medical community and various attempts to improve prescription practices, existing antimicrobial stewardship programmes are not always effective. In our view, this may reflect limited understanding of factors that influence prescription of antimicrobials as empirical therapy, implying a need to address the psychological mechanisms behind some of the specific behaviours involved. Objectives To identify factors that influence the antimicrobials prescription as empirical therapy, and to relate these factors to findings from behavioural science. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the literature on the factors underlying antimicrobial prescription decisions, following the protocol designed using PRISMA guidelines. Results and conclusions From a final sample of 90 sources, we identified ten factors important in antimicrobial prescription decisions. In the second stage of our analysis, we grouped them into five final categories: (1) nature of the decision, (2) social influences, (3) individual differences, (4) characteristics of the patient, (5) context. We analyse these categories using a behavioural science perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deirdre A Robertson
- Behavioural Research Unit, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, School of Psychology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aisling Rafferty
- Children’s Health Ireland, Department of Pharmacy, Dublin, Ireland
- University of Birmingham, School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Sciences,Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert Cunney
- Children’s Health Ireland, Irish Meningitis and Sepsis Reference Laboratory, Dublin, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Microbiology, Dublin, Ireland
- Children’s Health Ireland, Department of Microbiology, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter D Lunn
- Behavioural Research Unit, The Economic and Social Research Institute, Whitaker Square, Sir John Rogerson’s Quay, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang Z, Tay E, Kuan WS, Tiah L, Weng Y, Tan HY, Seow E, Peng LL, Chow A. A multi-institutional exploration of emergency medicine physicians' attitudes and behaviours on antibiotic use during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2023; 12:24. [PMID: 36991475 PMCID: PMC10057674 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-023-01230-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the epidemiology of upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) and the disease profile of patients attending the emergency department (ED). Hence, we sought to explore the changes in ED physicians' attitudes and behaviours in four EDs in Singapore. METHODS We employed a sequential mixed-methods approach (quantitative survey followed by in-depth interviews). Principal component analysis was performed to derive latent factors, followed by multivariable logistic regression to explore the independent factors associated with high antibiotic prescribing. Interviews were analysed using the deductive-inductive-deductive framework. We derive five meta-inferences by integrating the quantitative and qualitative findings with an explanatory bidirectional framework. RESULTS We obtained 560 (65.9%) valid responses from the survey and interviewed 50 physicians from various work experiences. ED physicians were twice as likely to report high antibiotic prescribing rates pre-COVID-19 pandemic than during the pandemic (AOR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.32 to 3.41, p = 0.002). Five meta-inferences were made by integrating the data: (1) Less pressure to prescribe antibiotics due to reduced patient demand and more patient education opportunities; (2) A higher proportion of ED physicians self-reported lower antibiotic prescribing rates during the COVID-19 pandemic but their perception of the overall outlook on antibiotic prescribing rates varied; (3) Physicians who were high antibiotic prescribers during the COVID-19 pandemic made less effort for prudent antibiotic prescribing as they were less concerned about antimicrobial resistance; (4) the COVID-19 pandemic did not change the factors that lowered the threshold for antibiotic prescribing; (5) the COVID-19 pandemic did not change the perception that the public's knowledge of antibiotics is poor. CONCLUSIONS Self-reported antibiotic prescribing rates decreased in the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic due to less pressure to prescribe antibiotics. The lessons and experiences learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic can be incorporated into public and medical education in the war against antimicrobial resistance going forward. Antibiotic use should also be monitored post-pandemic to assess if the changes are sustained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhilian Huang
- Department of Preventive and Population Medicine, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge [OCEAN], Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore
- National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Evonne Tay
- Department of Preventive and Population Medicine, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge [OCEAN], Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore
- National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Win Sen Kuan
- Department Emergency Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ling Tiah
- Accident & Emergency Department, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yanyi Weng
- Department Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hann Yee Tan
- Acute and Emergency Care Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Eillyne Seow
- Acute and Emergency Care Department, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Li Lee Peng
- Department Emergency Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Angela Chow
- Department of Preventive and Population Medicine, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge [OCEAN], Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jalan Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Social influence is the main driver of emergency physicians’ intention to use an antibiotic clinical decision support mobile application. J Hosp Infect 2022; 129:207-210. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
8
|
Burrowes SAB, Barlam TF, Skinner A, Berger R, Ni P, Drainoni ML. Provider views on rapid diagnostic tests and antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract infections: A mixed methods study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0260598. [PMID: 34843599 PMCID: PMC8629209 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) are often inappropriately treated with antibiotics. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) have been developed with the aim of improving antibiotic prescribing but uptake remains low. The aim of this study was to examine provider knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding RDT use and their relationship to antibiotic prescribing decisions across multiple clinical departments in an urban safety-net hospital. METHODS We conducted a mixed methods sequential explanatory study. Providers with prescribing authority (attending physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants) who had at least 20 RTI encounters from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2018. Eighty-five providers completed surveys and 16 participated in interviews. We conducted electronic surveys via RedCap from April to July 2019, followed by semi-structured individual interviews from October to December 2019, to ascertain knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to RDT use and antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS Survey findings indicated that providers felt knowledgeable about antibiotic prescribing guidelines. They reported high familiarity with the rapid streptococcus and rapid influenza tests. Familiarity with comprehensive respiratory panel PCR (RPP-respiratory panel PCR) and procalcitonin differed by clinical department. Qualitative interviews identified four main themes: providers trust their clinical judgment more than rapid test results; patient-provider relationships play an important role in prescribing decisions; there is patient demand for antibiotics and providers employ different strategies to address the demand and providers do not believe RDTs are implemented with sufficient education or evidence for clinical practice. CONCLUSION Prescribers are knowledgeable about prescribing guidelines but often rely on clinical judgement to make final decisions. The utility of RDTs is specific to the type of RDT and the clinical department. Given the low familiarity and clinical utility of RPP and procalcitonin, providers may require additional education and these tests may need to be implemented differently based on clinical department.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shana A. B. Burrowes
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Tamar F. Barlam
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Alexandra Skinner
- Department of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Rebecca Berger
- Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Pengsheng Ni
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center (BEDAC) Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Mari-Lynn Drainoni
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huang Z, Weng Y, Ang H, Chow A. Determinants of antibiotic over-prescribing for upper respiratory tract infections in an emergency department with good primary care access: a quantitative analysis. J Hosp Infect 2021; 113:71-76. [PMID: 33891986 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) account for the highest proportion of non-urgent visits to the emergency department (ED), resulting in unnecessary antibiotic use. AIM This study sought to understand the determinants of antibiotic prescribing for URTI among 130 junior physicians in a busy adult ED in Singapore. METHODS Forty-four Likert-scale statements were developed with reference to a prior qualitative study, followed by an anonymous cross-sectional survey among ED junior physicians. Data analysis was performed with factor reduction and multivariable logistic regression. FINDINGS One-in-six (16.9%) physicians were high antibiotic prescribers (self-reported antibiotic prescribing rate of >30% of URTI patients). After adjusting for place of medical education and years of practice as a physician, perceived over-prescribing of antibiotics in the ED (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.15, 4.86), P=0.019) and perceived compliance with the antibiotic prescribing practices in the ED (adjusted OR 2.10, 95% CI (1.02, 4.30), P=0.043) were positively associated with high antibiotic prescribing. In contrast, high antibiotic prescribers were 6.67 times (95% CI (1.67, 25.0), P=0.007) less likely to treat and manage patients with URTI symptomatically and 7.12 times (95% CI (1.28, 39.66), P=0.025) more likely to depend on diagnostic tests to prescribe antibiotics than the regular antibiotic prescribers. CONCLUSION Organizational-related factors (organizational norms and culture) were strong determinants of antibiotic prescribing practices for uncomplicated URTI in the ED. Other contributing factors include diagnostic uncertainty and knowledge gaps. Role-modelling of institutional best practice norms and clinical decision support tools based on local epidemiology can optimize antibiotic prescribing in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Huang
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge [OCEAN], Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Y Weng
- Department Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - H Ang
- Department Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - A Chow
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics, and Knowledge [OCEAN], Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wagner CE, Prentice JA, Saad-Roy CM, Yang L, Grenfell BT, Levin SA, Laxminarayan R. Economic and Behavioral Influencers of Vaccination and Antimicrobial Use. Front Public Health 2020; 8:614113. [PMID: 33409264 PMCID: PMC7779682 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.614113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite vast improvements in global vaccination coverage during the last decade, there is a growing trend in vaccine hesitancy and/or refusal globally. This has implications for the acceptance and coverage of a potential vaccine against COVID-19. In the United States, the number of children exempt from vaccination for “philosophical belief-based” non-medical reasons increased in 12 of the 18 states that allowed this policy from 2009 to 2017 (1). Meanwhile, the overuse and misuse of antibiotics, especially in young children, have led to increasing rates of drug resistance that threaten our ability to treat infectious diseases. Vaccine hesitancy and antibiotic overuse exist side-by-side in the same population of young children, and it is unclear why one modality (antibiotics) is universally seen as safe and effective, while the other (vaccines) is seen as potentially hazardous by some. In this review, we consider the drivers shaping the use of vaccines and antibiotics in the context of three factors: individual incentives, risk perceptions, and social norms and group dynamics. We illustrate how these factors contribute to the societal and individual costs of vaccine underuse and antimicrobial overuse. Ultimately, we seek to understand these factors that are at the nexus of infectious disease epidemiology and social science to inform policy-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline E Wagner
- Department of Bioengineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Joseph A Prentice
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | - Chadi M Saad-Roy
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.,Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | - Luojun Yang
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | - Bryan T Grenfell
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.,Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.,Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Simon A Levin
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.,Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
| | - Ramanan Laxminarayan
- Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States.,Center for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Medina-Perucha L, García-Sangenís A, Moragas A, Gálvez-Hernández P, Cots JM, Lanau-Roig A, Borràs A, Amo I, Monfà R, Llor C, Berenguera A. Autonomy, power dynamics and antibiotic use in primary healthcare: A qualitative study. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0244432. [PMID: 33338078 PMCID: PMC7748265 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Antibiotic resistance is a global health concern. Although numerous strategies have tried to reduce inadequate antibiotic prescribing, antibiotics are still prescribed in 60% of acute lower respiratory tract infections (ALRTIs) cases in Catalonia (Spain). This study aims to explore service users' experiences of ALRTIs, the quality and access to healthcare services, and health education. Selective purposive sampling was carried out, based on a prior definition of participant characteristics. These were sex, age, ethnicity, date of the last ALRTI, number of ALRTIs in the last year, and treatments received. Participants with a previous diagnosis of ALRTIs were recruited from three primary health care centres in Barcelona and one in Tarragona. Twenty-nine interviews were conducted between April and June 2019. A content thematic analysis was performed. Three themes were identified: 1) risk perceptions and help-seeking; 2) treatment preferences and antibiotic use; and 3) relationship dynamics and communication with healthcare professionals. Accounts of service users' sense of autonomy towards their health and power dynamics within the healthcare system were apparent. Supporting service users to become reliable, subjective and agentic experts of their health and bodies could help them to voice their healthcare agendas. Power structures embedded within healthcare, political and economic institutions should be challenged so that healthcare services can be co-developed (with service users) and based on service users' autonomy and horizontal relationships. Special consideration should be paid to the intersection of social vulnerabilities. A concordance approach to prescribing could be key to improve the responsible use of antibiotics and to contribute to the prevention of AMR in primary healthcare. The marketisation of health, and the increased demands of private healthcare in Spain due to the financial pressures on public healthcare as a consequence of the financial crisis of 2008 and the COVID-19 pandemic, are a risk for promoting adequate antibiotic prescribing and use. Trial registration The ISAAC-CAT study has been registered in the NCT registry, ID: NCT03931577.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Medina-Perucha
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana García-Sangenís
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
| | - Ana Moragas
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Jaume I Health Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Pablo Gálvez-Hernández
- Institut Universitari de Pacients (Patients’ University Institut), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
- University of Toronto, IHPME-BFON Collaborative PhD Specialization Program in Health Services and Policy Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Josep María Cots
- La Marina Health Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, Associació d’Infermeria Familiar i Comunitària de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Lanau-Roig
- La Marina Health Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, Associació d’Infermeria Familiar i Comunitària de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alícia Borràs
- Institut Universitari de Pacients (Patients’ University Institut), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
- Escola Universitària d'Infermeria, Escoles Universitàries Gimbernat, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain
| | - Isabel Amo
- Institut Universitari de Pacients (Patients’ University Institut), Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ramon Monfà
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
| | - Carl Llor
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Via Roma Health Centre, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Berenguera
- Fundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain
- Departament d'Infermeria, Universitat de Girona, Girona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wong JG, Aung AH, Lian W, Lye DC, Ooi CK, Chow A. Risk prediction models to guide antibiotic prescribing: a study on adult patients with uncomplicated upper respiratory tract infections in an emergency department. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:171. [PMID: 33138859 PMCID: PMC7605344 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00825-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate antibiotic prescribing is key to combating antimicrobial resistance. Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are common reasons for emergency department (ED) visits and antibiotic use. Differentiating between bacterial and viral infections is not straightforward. We aim to provide an evidence-based clinical decision support tool for antibiotic prescribing using prediction models developed from local data. METHODS Seven hundred-fifteen patients with uncomplicated URTI were recruited and analysed from Singapore's busiest ED, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, from June 2016 to November 2018. Confirmatory tests were performed using the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for respiratory viruses and point-of-care test for C-reactive protein. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were extracted from the hospital electronic medical records. Seventy percent of the data was used for training and the remaining 30% was used for validation. Decision trees, LASSO and logistic regression models were built to predict when antibiotics were not needed. RESULTS The median age of the cohort was 36 years old, with 61.2% being male. Temperature and pulse rate were significant factors in all 3 models. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) on the validation set for the models were similar. (LASSO: 0.70 [95% CI: 0.62-0.77], logistic regression: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.65-0.79], decision tree: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.59-0.74]). Combining the results from all models, 58.3% of study participants would not need antibiotics. CONCLUSION The models can be easily deployed as a decision support tool to guide antibiotic prescribing in busy EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Guoxian Wong
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics and Knowledge, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Aung-Hein Aung
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics and Knowledge, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Weixiang Lian
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics and Knowledge, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - David Chien Lye
- Infectious Disease Research and Training Office, National Centre for Infectious Diseases, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chee-Kheong Ooi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Angela Chow
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Office of Clinical Epidemiology, Analytics and Knowledge, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gamborg ML, Mehlsen M, Paltved C, Tramm G, Musaeus P. Conceptualizations of clinical decision-making: a scoping review in geriatric emergency medicine. BMC Emerg Med 2020; 20:73. [PMID: 32928158 PMCID: PMC7489001 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-020-00367-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical decision-making (CDM) is an important competency for young doctors especially under complex and uncertain conditions in geriatric emergency medicine (GEM). However, research in this field is characterized by vague conceptualizations of CDM. To evolve and evaluate evidence-based knowledge of CDM, it is important to identify different definitions and their operationalizations in studies on GEM. OBJECTIVE A scoping review of empirical articles was conducted to provide an overview of the documented evidence of findings and conceptualizations of CDM in GEM. METHODS A detailed search for empirical studies focusing on CDM in a GEM setting was conducted in PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, EMBASE and Web of Science. In total, 52 publications were included in the analysis, utilizing a data extraction sheet, following the PRISMA guidelines. Reported outcomes were summarized. RESULTS Four themes of operationalization of CDM emerged: CDM as dispositional decisions, CDM as cognition, CDM as a model, and CDM as clinical judgement. Study results and conclusions naturally differed according to how CDM was conceptualized. Thus, frailty-heuristics lead to biases in treatment of geriatric patients and the complexity of this patient group was seen as a challenge for young physicians engaging in CDM. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review summarizes how different studies in GEM use the term CDM. It provides an analysis of findings in GEM and call for more stringent definitions of CDM in future research, so that it might lead to better clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Louise Gamborg
- Centre for Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
- Corporate HR MidtSim, Central Region of Denmark & Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | - Mimi Mehlsen
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Paltved
- Corporate HR MidtSim, Central Region of Denmark & Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Gitte Tramm
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Musaeus
- Centre for Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Empowerment of nurses in antibiotic stewardship: a social ecological qualitative analysis. J Hosp Infect 2020; 106:473-482. [PMID: 32896586 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate antibiotics use and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are increasingly becoming global health issues of great concern. Despite the established antibiotic stewardship programmes (ASPs) in many countries, limited efforts have been made to engage nurses and clearly define their roles in ASPs. AIM An exploratory qualitative study was conducted to understand the facilitators and barriers that impact nurses' involvement and empowerment in antibiotic stewardship. METHODS Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with purposively sampled nurses from three major public hospitals in Singapore. FGDs were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using Applied Thematic Analysis and interpreted using the Social Ecological Model. FINDINGS At the intrapersonal level, nurses felt empowered in carrying out their roles in antibiotic administration. They saw themselves as gatekeepers to ensure that the prescribed antibiotics were administered appropriately. However, nurses felt they lacked the knowledge and expertise in antibiotic use and AMR prevention. At the interpersonal level, this deficit in knowledge and expertise in antibiotic use impacted how they were perceived by patients and caregivers as well as their interactions with the primary care team when voicing outpatient safety concerns and antibiotic administration suggestions. At the organizational level, nurses relied on drug administration guidelines to ensure appropriate antibiotic administration and as a safety net when physicians questioned their clinical practice. At the community level, nurses felt there was a lack of awareness and knowledge on antibiotic use among the general population. CONCLUSION These findings provide important insights to harness the contributions of nurses, and to formally acknowledge and enlarge their roles in ASPs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Willcox M, Donovan E, Hu XY, Elboray S, Jerrard N, Roberts N, Santer M. Views regarding use of complementary therapies for acute respiratory infections: Systematic review of qualitative studies. Complement Ther Med 2020; 50:102382. [PMID: 32444047 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unnecessary antibiotic prescribing and use are most common for uncomplicated acute respiratory infections (ARIs). Some Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) treatments have evidence of effectiveness for symptom relief and could be used instead of antibiotics. AIM To understand views of the general public and health professionals regarding use of CAM for uncomplicated ARIs. DESIGN AND SETTING Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. METHOD We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, COREHOM, CINAHL, Dissertation and theses global and Web of Science Core Collection. We included studies which reported qualitative data on the use of CAM for uncomplicated ARIs where participants were either patients or parents of patients, health professionals or the general public. Analysis followed thematic synthesis. RESULTS Twenty-two studies were included from four high-income and ten low-and-middle income countries; almost all focussed on non-White populations. Nineteen concerned parents' treatment of ARIs in their children. In all settings, treatment decisions were influenced by beliefs about the illness (cause, severity), beliefs about treatments (efficacy, safety), availability of treatments and of trustworthy advice. Participants mostly thought CAM is an acceptable option for treatment of mild ARIs but felt that they need trustworthy advice on which treatments to use and when. CONCLUSION Treatment decisions depend on beliefs about the illness and treatments, availability of treatments and advice. CAM treatments appear to be acceptable to people from many different settings as a possible alternative to antibiotics for mild ARIs. There is a need for reliable, evidence-based advice on which treatments to use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merlin Willcox
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, United Kingdom.
| | - Emily Donovan
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, United Kingdom
| | - Xiao-Yang Hu
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, United Kingdom
| | - Shereen Elboray
- University Hospital Southampton, Wessex Deanery, Health Education England, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Jerrard
- Medical School, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Nia Roberts
- Bodleian Healthcare Libraries, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Miriam Santer
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Close, Southampton SO16 5ST, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|