Characterization of inhibitory postsynaptic currents in rod bipolar cells of the mouse retina

Dopamine D1 receptor activation reduces local inner retinal inhibition to light-adapted levels

During adaptation from dim to bright environments, changes in retinal signaling are mediated, in part, by dopamine. Dopamine is released with light and can modulate retinal receptive fields, neuronal coupling, inhibitory receptors, and rod pathway inhibition. However, it is unclear how dopamine affects inner retinal inhibition to cone bipolar cells, which relay visual information from photoreceptors to ganglion cells and are important signal processing sites. We tested the hypothesis that dopamine (D)1 receptor activation is sufficient to elicit light-adapted inhibitory changes. Local light-evoked inhibition and spontaneous activity were measured from OFF cone bipolar cells in dark-adapted mouse retinas while stimulating D1 receptors, which are located on bipolar, horizontal, and inhibitory amacrine cells. The D1 agonist SKF38393 reduced local inhibitory light-evoked response magnitude and increased response transience, which mimicked changes measured with light adaptation. D1-mediated reductions in local inhibition were more pronounced for glycinergic than GABAergic inputs, comparable with light adaptation. The effects of D1 receptors on light-evoked input were similar to the effects on spontaneous input. D1 receptor activation primarily decreased glycinergic spontaneous current frequency, similar to light adaptation, suggesting mainly a presynaptic amacrine cell site of action. These results expand the role of dopamine to include signal modulation of cone bipolar cell local inhibition. In this role, D1 receptor activation, acting primarily through glycinergic amacrine cells, may be an important mechanism for the light-adapted reduction in OFF bipolar cell inhibition since the actions are similar and dopamine is released during light adaptation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Retinal adaptation to different luminance conditions requires the adjustment of local circuits for accurate signaling of visual scenes. Understanding mechanisms behind luminance adaptation at different retinal levels is important for understanding how the retina functions in a dynamic environment. In the mouse, we show that dopamine pathways reduce inner retinal inhibition similar to increased background luminance, suggesting the two are linked and highlighting a possible mechanism for light adaptation at an early retinal processing center.

Direct measurement of bipolar cell responses to electrical stimulation in wholemount mouse retina

OBJECTIVE

This in vitro investigation examines the response of retinal bipolar cells to extracellular electrical stimulation.

APPROACH

In vitro investigations characterizing the response of retinal neurons to electrical stimulation have primarily focused on retinal ganglion cells because they are the output neurons of the retina and their superficial position in the retina makes them readily accessible to in vitro recording techniques. Thus, the majority of information regarding the response of inner retinal neurons has been inferred from ganglion cell activity. Here we use patch clamp electrophysiology to directly record electrically-evoked activity in bipolar cells within the inner retina of normal Tg(Gng13-EGFP)GI206Gsat and degenerate rd10 Tg(Gng13-EGFP)GI206Gsat mice using a wholemount preparation.

MAIN RESULTS

Bipolar cells respond to electrical stimulation with time-locked depolarizing voltage transients. The latency of the response declines with increases in stimulation amplitude. A desensitizing response is observed during repeated stimulation with 25 ms biphasic current pulses delivered at pulse rates greater than 6 pps. A burst of long-latency (200-1000 ms) inhibitory postsynaptic potentials are evoked by the stimulus and the burst exhibits evidence of a lower and upper stimulation threshold.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results provide insights into the various types of bipolar cell activity elicited by electrical stimulation and may be useful for future retinal prosthesis stimulation protocols. This investigation uses patch clamp electrophysiology to provide direct analysis of ON-type bipolar cell responses to electrical stimulation in a wholemount retina preparation. It explores the effects of variable stimulus amplitudes, pulse widths, and frequencies in both normal and degenerate retina. The analysis adds to a body of work largely based upon indirect measurements of bipolar cell activity, and the methodology demonstrates an alternative retina preparation technique in which to acquire single-cell activity.

Method to remove photoreceptors from whole mount retina in vitro

Patch clamp recordings of neurons in the inner nuclear layer of the retina are difficult to conduct in a whole mount retina preparation because surrounding neurons block the path of the patch pipette. Vertical slice preparations or dissociated retinal cells provide access to bipolar cells at the cost of severing the lateral connection between neurons. We have developed a technique to remove photoreceptors from the rodent retina that exposes inner nuclear layer neurons, allowing access for patch clamp recording. Repeated application to and removal of filter paper from the photoreceptor side of an isolated retina effectively and efficiently removes photoreceptor cells and, in degenerate retina, hypertrophied Müller cell end feet. Live-dead assays applied to neurons remaining after photoreceptor removal demonstrated mostly viable cells. Patch clamp recordings from bipolar cells reveal responses similar to those recorded in traditional slice and dissociated cell preparations. An advantage of the photoreceptor peel technique is that it exposes inner retinal neurons in a whole mount retina preparation for investigation of signal processing. A disadvantage is that photoreceptor removal alters input to remaining retinal neurons. The technique may be useful for investigations of extracellular electrical stimulation, photoreceptor DNA analysis, and nonpharmacological removal of light input.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study reports a method for removing photoreceptors from rodent whole mount retina while preserving the architecture of the inner retina. The method enables easier access to the inner retina for studies of neural processing, such as by patch clamp recording.

Patch clamp recordings of retinal bipolar cells in response to extracellular electrical stimulation in wholemount mouse retina

Retinitis pigmentosa is a family of inherited retinal diseases identified by the degeneration of photoreceptors, which leads to blindness. In efforts to restore vision lost to retinitis pigmentosa, retinal prostheses have been developed to generate visual percepts by electrically stimulating the surviving retinal bipolar and ganglion cells. The response of retinal ganglion cells to electrical stimulation has been characterized through direct measurement. However, the response of bipolar cells has only been inferred by measuring retinal ganglion cell activity. This investigation reports on a novel tissue preparation technique facilitating bipolar cell patch clamp recordings in wholemount retina. We find that bipolar cells respond to extracellular electrical stimuli with time-locked voltage spike depolarizations, which are likely mediated by voltage-gated calcium channels.

Different types of retinal inhibition have distinct neurotransmitter release properties

Neurotransmitter release varies between neurons due to differences in presynaptic mechanisms such as Ca(2+) sensitivity and timing. Retinal rod bipolar cells respond to brief dim illumination with prolonged glutamate release that is tuned by the differential release of GABA and glycine from amacrine cells in the inner retina. To test if differences among types of GABA and glycine release are due to inherent amacrine cell release properties, we directly activated amacrine cell neurotransmitter release by electrical stimulation. We found that the timing of electrically evoked inhibitory currents was inherently slow and that the timecourse of inhibition from slowest to fastest was GABAC receptors > glycine receptors > GABAA receptors. Deconvolution analysis showed that the distinct timing was due to differences in prolonged GABA and glycine release from amacrine cells. The timecourses of slow glycine release and GABA release onto GABAC receptors were reduced by Ca(2+) buffering with EGTA-AM and BAPTA-AM, but faster GABA release on GABAA receptors was not, suggesting that release onto GABAA receptors is tightly coupled to Ca(2+). The differential timing of GABA release was detected from spiking amacrine cells and not nonspiking A17 amacrine cells that form a reciprocal synapse with rod bipolar cells. Our results indicate that release from amacrine cells is inherently asynchronous and that the source of nonreciprocal rod bipolar cell inhibition differs between GABA receptors. The slow, differential timecourse of inhibition may be a mechanism to match the prolonged rod bipolar cell glutamate release and provide a way to temporally tune information across retinal pathways.

Receptor targets of amacrine cells

Amacrine cells are a morphologically and functionally diverse group of inhibitory interneurons. Morphologically, they have been divided into approximately 30 types. Although this diversity is probably important to the fine structure and function of the retinal circuit, the amacrine cells have been more generally divided into two subclasses. Glycinergic narrow-field amacrine cells have dendrites that ramify close to their somas, cross the sublaminae of the inner plexiform layer, and create cross talk between its parallel ON and OFF pathways. GABAergic wide-field amacrine cells have dendrites that stretch long distances from their soma but ramify narrowly within an inner plexiform layer sublamina. These wide-field cells are thought to mediate inhibition within a sublamina and thus within the ON or OFF pathway. The postsynaptic targets of all amacrine cell types include bipolar, ganglion, and other amacrine cells. Almost all amacrine cells use GABA or glycine as their primary neurotransmitter, and their postsynaptic receptor targets include the most common GABA(A), GABA(C), and glycine subunit receptor configurations. This review addresses the diversity of amacrine cells, the postsynaptic receptors on their target cells in the inner plexiform layer of the retina, and some of the inhibitory mechanisms that arise as a result. When possible, the effects of GABAergic and glycinergic inputs on the visually evoked responses of their postsynaptic targets are discussed.

The mode of retinal presynaptic inhibition switches with light intensity

Excitatory amino acid transporters (EAATs) terminate signaling in the CNS by clearing released glutamate. Glutamate also evokes an EAAT-mediated Cl(-) current, but its role in CNS signaling is poorly understood. We show in mouse retina that EAAT-mediated Cl(-) currents that were evoked by light inhibit rod pathway signaling. EAATs reside on rod bipolar cell axon terminals where GABA and glycine receptors also mediate light-evoked inhibition. We found that the mode of inhibition depended on light intensity. Dim light evoked GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition with rapid kinetics and a large spatial extent. Bright light evoked predominantly EAAT-mediated inhibition with slow kinetics and a small spatial extent. The switch to EAAT-mediated signaling in bright light supplements receptor-mediated signaling to expand the dynamic range of inhibition and contributes to the transition from rod to cone signaling by suppressing rod pathway signaling in bright light conditions.

Potentiating action of propofol at GABAA receptors of retinal bipolar cells

PURPOSE

Propofol (2,6-diisopropyl phenol), a widely used systemic anesthetic, is known to potentiate GABA(A) receptor activity in a number of CNS neurons and to produce changes in electroretinographically recorded responses of the retina. However, little is known about propofol's effects on specific retinal neurons. The authors investigated the action of propofol on GABA-elicited membrane current responses of retinal bipolar cells, which have both GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors.

METHODS

Single, enzymatically dissociated bipolar cells obtained from rat retina were treated with propofol delivered by brief application in combination with GABA or other pharmacologic agents or as a component of the superfusing medium.

RESULTS

When applied with GABA at subsaturating concentrations and with TPMPA (a known GABA(C) antagonist), propofol markedly increased the peak amplitude and altered the kinetics of the response. Propofol increased the response elicited by THIP (a GABA(A)-selective agonist), and the response was reduced by bicuculline (a GABA(A) antagonist). The response to 5-methyl I4AA, a GABA(C)-selective agonist, was not enhanced by propofol. Serial brief applications of (GABA + TPMPA + propofol) led to a progressive increase in peak response amplitude and, at higher propofol concentrations, additional changes that included a prolonged time course of response recovery. Pre-exposure of the cell to perfusing propofol typically enhanced the rate of development of potentiation produced by (GABA + TPMPA + propofol) applications.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol exerts a marked and selective potentiation on GABA(A) receptors of retinal bipolar cells. The data encourage the use of propofol in future studies of bipolar cell function.

Mechanisms underlying lateral GABAergic feedback onto rod bipolar cells in rat retina

GABAergic feedback inhibition from amacrine cells shapes visual signaling in the inner retina. Rod bipolar cells (RBCs), ON-sensitive cells that depolarize in response to light increments, receive reciprocal GABAergic feedback from A17 amacrine cells and additional GABAergic inputs from other amacrine cells located laterally in the inner plexiform layer. The circuitry and synaptic mechanisms underlying lateral GABAergic inhibition of RBCs are poorly understood. A-type and rho-subunit-containing (C-type) GABA receptors (GABA(A)Rs and GABA(C)Rs) mediate both forms of inhibition, but their relative activation during synaptic transmission is unclear, and potential interactions between adjacent reciprocal and lateral synapses have not been explored. Here, we recorded from RBCs in acute slices of rat retina and isolated lateral GABAergic inhibition by pharmacologically ablating A17 amacrine cells. We found that amacrine cells providing lateral GABAergic inhibition to RBCs receive excitatory synaptic input mostly from ON bipolar cells via activation of both Ca(2+)-impermeable and Ca(2+)-permeable AMPA receptors (CP-AMPARs) but not NMDA receptors (NMDARs). Voltage-gated Ca(2+) (Ca(v)) channels mediate the majority of Ca(2+) influx that triggers GABA release, although CP-AMPARs contribute a small component. The intracellular Ca(2+) signal contributing to transmitter release is amplified by Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release from intracellular stores via activation of ryanodine receptors. Furthermore, lateral nonreciprocal feedback is mediated primarily by GABA(C)Rs that are activated independently from receptors mediating reciprocal feedback inhibition. These results illustrate numerous physiological differences that distinguish GABA release at reciprocal and lateral synapses, indicating complex, pathway-specific modulation of RBC signaling.

Antagonists of ionotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors impair the NiCl2-mediated stimulation of the electroretinogram b-wave amplitude from the isolated superfused vertebrate retina

PURPOSE

NiCl(2) (15 microM) stimulates the electroretinogram (ERG) b-wave amplitude of vertebrate retina up to 1.5-fold through its blocking of E/R-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels. Assuming that such an increase is mediated by blocking the release of the inhibitory neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) via ionotropic GABA receptors, we tested the effect of both GABA itself and GABA-receptor antagonists such as (-)bicuculline (1.51-fold increase) and (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA; 1.46-fold increase) on the b-wave amplitude.

METHODS

Recording of the transretinal potentials from the isolated bovine retina.

RESULTS

GABA (100 microM) reduced the b-wave amplitude only when NiCl(2) (15 microM) was applied first. Each antagonist applied on its own stimulated the b-wave amplitude only partially: subsequent NiCl(2) superfusion caused a small but additional increase, leading to a 1.69- and a 1.88-fold total increase of the amplitude by Ni(2+) plus (-)bicuculline or Ni(2+) plus TPMPA, respectively. Only the application of both antagonists in combination, before superfusing low NiCl(2) (15 microM), completely prevented subsequent stimulation by NiCl(2) with a similar 1.90-fold total increase of b-wave amplitude. Those retina segments that did not respond to NiCl(2) could not be stimulated by (-)bicuculline and vice versa.

CONCLUSION

The stimulatory effect of NiCl(2) on the ERG b-wave amplitude is mainly, but not only, mediated by a NiCl(2)-sensitive, Ca(v)2.3-triggered GABA release acting through ionotropic GABA-A and GABA-C receptors.

Properties of glycine receptors underlying synaptic currents in presynaptic axon terminals of rod bipolar cells in the rat retina

The excitability of presynaptic terminals can be controlled by synaptic input that directly targets the terminals. Retinal rod bipolar axon terminals receive presynaptic input from different types of amacrine cells, some of which are glycinergic. Here, we have performed patch-clamp recordings from rod bipolar axon terminals in rat retinal slices. We used whole-cell recordings to study glycinergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) under conditions of adequate local voltage clamp and outside-out patch recordings to study biophysical and pharmacological properties of the glycine receptors with ultrafast application. Glycinergic IPSCs, recorded in both intact cells and isolated terminals, were strychnine sensitive and displayed fast kinetics with a double-exponential decay. Ultrafast application of brief (approximately 1 ms) pulses of glycine (3 mM) to patches evoked responses with fast, double-exponential deactivation kinetics, no evidence of desensitization in double-pulse experiments, relatively low apparent affinity (EC(50) approximately 100 microM), and high maximum open probability (0.9). Longer pulses evoked slow, double-exponential desensitization and double-pulse experiments indicated slow, double-exponential recovery from desensitization. Non-stationary noise analysis of IPSCs and patch responses yielded single-channel conductances of approximately 41 pS and approximately 64 pS, respectively. Directly observed single-channel gating occurred at approximately 40-50 pS and approximately 80-90 pS in both types of responses, suggesting a mixture of heteromeric and homomeric receptors. Synaptic release of glycine leads to transient receptor activation, with about eight receptors available to bind transmitter after release of a single vesicle. With a low intracellular chloride concentration, this leads to either hyperpolarizing or shunting inhibition that will counteract passive and regenerative depolarization and depolarization-evoked transmitter release.

GABAC receptor-mediated inhibition is altered but not eliminated in the superior colliculus of GABAC rho1 knockout mice

GABA(C) receptors (GABA(C)Rs) are widely expressed in the mammalian subcortical visual system, particularly in the retina and superior colliculus (SC). GABA(C)Rs are composed of specific rho1-3 subunits the expression of which varies among visual structures. Thus rho1 subunits are most abundant in retina, and their loss eliminates GABA(C)R expression and function. In the SC, rho2 subunit expression may be equal to or stronger than rho1 subunit expression; however, results across studies vary considerably. To more directly assess the expression of GABA(C)R subunits, we characterized inhibition in the SC of wild-type (WT) and GABA(C) rho1 Null mice that lack expression of GABA(C) rho1 subunits. We used whole cell patch-clamp recordings and evaluated GABA(C)R-mediated modulation of electrically evoked post synaptic currents using either agonists or antagonists in WT mice. In GABA(C) rho1 Null stratum griseum superficiale (SGS) cells, inhibitory postsynaptic currents were shorter in duration and their excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) were longer, indicating that a slow GABA(C)R-mediated inhibitory component was reduced in each case. In contrast to retina, GABA(C)R-mediated currents in the SC were altered but not eliminated in GABA(C) rho1 Null mice. In the majority of SC cells in GABA(C) rho1 Null mice, GABA(C)R activation could still be induced to alter EPSC peak amplitudes in putative interneurons and in many projection neurons. These results, compared with previously published data, indicate a fundamental difference between retina and SC in the control of GABA(C)R expression and subunit composition.

Synaptic regulation of the light-dependent oscillatory currents in starburst amacrine cells of the mouse retina

Responses of on-center starburst amacrine cells to steady light stimuli were recorded in the dark-adapted mouse retina. The response to spots of dim white light appear to show two components, an initial peak that correspond to the onset of the light stimulus and a series of oscillations that ride on top of the initial peak relaxation. The frequency of oscillations during light stimulation was three time higher than the frequency of spontaneous oscillations recorded in the dark. The light-evoked responses in starburst cells were exclusively dependent on the release of glutamate likely from presynaptic bipolar axon terminals and the binding of glutamate to AMPA/kainate receptors because they were blocked by 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxalene-2,3-dione. The synaptic pathway responsible for the light responses was blocked by AP4, an agonist of metabotropic glutamate receptors that hyperpolarize on-center bipolar cells on activation. Light responses were inhibited by the calcium channel blockers cadmium ions and nifedipine, suggesting that the release of glutamate was calcium dependent. The oscillatory component of the response was specifically inhibited by blocking the glutamate transporter with d-threo-beta-benzyloxyaspartic acid, suggesting that glutamate reuptake is necessary for the oscillatory release. GABAergic antagonists bicuculline, SR 95531, and picrotoxin increased the amplitude of the initial peak while they inhibit the frequency of oscillations. TTX had a similar effect. Strychnine, the blocker of glycine receptors did not affect the initial peak but strongly decreased the oscillations frequency. These inhibitory inputs onto the bipolar axon terminals shape and synchronize the oscillatory component.

Electrophysiological evidence of GABAA and GABAC receptors on zebrafish retinal bipolar cells

To refine inhibitory circuitry models for ON and OFF pathways in zebrafish retina, GABAergic properties of zebrafish bipolar cells were studied with two techniques: whole cell patch responses to GABA puffs in retinal slice, and voltage probe responses in isolated cells. Retinal slices documented predominantly axon terminal responses; isolated cells revealed mainly soma-dendritic responses. In the slice, GABA elicited a conductance increase, GABA responses were more robust at axon terminals than dendrites, and Erev varied with [Cl(-)]in. Axon terminals of ON- and OFF-type cells were similarly sensitive to GABA (30-40 pA peak current); axotomized cells were unresponsive. Bicuculline-sensitive, picrotoxin-sensitive, and picrotoxin-insensitive components were identified. Muscimol was as effective as GABA; baclofen was ineffective. Isolated bipolar cells were either intact or axotomized. Even in cells without an axon, GABA or muscimol (but not baclofen) hyperpolarized dendritic and somatic regions, suggesting significant distal expression. Median fluorescence change for GABA was -0.22 log units (approximately -16 mV); median half-amplitude dose was 0.4 microM. Reduced [Cl(-)]out blocked GABA responses. GABA hyperpolarized isolated ON-bipolar cells; OFF-cells were either unresponsive or depolarized. Hyperpolarizing GABA responses in isolated cells were bicuculline and TPMPA insensitive, but blocked or partially blocked by picrotoxin or zinc. In summary, axon terminals contain bicuculline-sensitive GABAA receptors and both picrotoxin-sensitive and insensitive GABAC receptors. Dendritic processes express zinc- and picrotoxin-sensitive GABAC receptors.

Development of presynaptic inhibition onto retinal bipolar cell axon terminals is subclass-specific

Synaptic integration is modulated by inhibition onto the dendrites of postsynaptic cells. However, presynaptic inhibition at axonal terminals also plays a critical role in the regulation of neurotransmission. In contrast to the development of inhibitory synapses onto dendrites, GABAergic/glycinergic synaptogenesis onto axon terminals has not been widely studied. Because retinal bipolar cells receive subclass-specific patterns of GABAergic and glycinergic presynaptic inhibition, they are a good model for studying the development of inhibition at axon terminals. Here, using whole cell recording methods and transgenic mice in which subclasses of retinal bipolar cells are labeled, we determined the temporal sequence and patterning of functional GABAergic and glycinergic input onto the major subclasses of bipolar cells. We found that the maturation of GABAergic and glycinergic synapses onto the axons of rod bipolar cells (RBCs), on-cone bipolar cells (ON-CBCs) and off-cone bipolar cells (OFF-CBCs) were temporally distinct: spontaneous chloride-mediated currents are present in RBCs earlier in development compared with ON- and OFF-CBC, and RBCs receive GABAergic and glycinergic input simultaneously, whereas in OFF-CBCs, glycinergic transmission emerges before GABAergic transmission. Because on-CBCs show little inhibitory activity, GABAergic and glycinergic events could not be pharmacologically distinguished for these bipolar cells. The balance of GABAergic and glycinergic input that is unique to RBCs and OFF-CBCs is established shortly after the onset of synapse formation and precedes visual experience. Our data suggest that presynaptic modulation of glutamate transmission from bipolar cells matures rapidly and is differentially coordinated for GABAergic and glycinergic synapses onto distinct bipolar cell subclasses.

Inhibitory feedback shapes bipolar cell responses in the rabbit retina

Retinal bipolar cells can be divided into on and off types based on the polarity of their response to light. Bipolar activity is further shaped by inhibitory inputs, characterized here by the events that occur immediately after the onset of a light step: 1) in most off bipolar cells, excitatory current decreased, whereas inhibitory current increased. These currents reinforced each other, enhancing the light response. 2) In about half of the on cone bipolar cells, the excitatory current increased, whereas inhibitory current decreased, also reinforcing the light response. Both of these reinforcing interactions were mediated by glycinergic inhibition. 3) In the remaining on cone bipolar cells, excitation and inhibition both increased, but inhibition was delayed so that these cells responded transiently. 4) Finally, in rod bipolar cells, excitation and inhibition both increased so that inhibition suppressed excitation, reducing the light response at all time scales. The suppressive inhibition seen in on cone and rod bipolar cells was mediated by GABA. Thus morphologically diverse bipolar cells receive only four main types of inhibitory input, and the majority of "inhibitory" inputs actually serve to enhance excitation.

Presynaptic inhibition differentially shapes transmission in distinct circuits in the mouse retina

Diverse retinal outputs are mediated by ganglion cells that receive excitatory input from distinct classes of bipolar cells (BCs). These classes of BCs separate visual signals into rod, ON and OFF cone pathways. Although BC signalling is a major determinant of the ganglion cell-mediated retinal output, it is not fully understood how light-evoked, presynaptic inhibition from amacrine cell inputs shapes BC outputs. To determine whether differences in presynaptic inhibition uniquely modulate BC synaptic output to specific ganglion cells, we assessed the inhibitory contributions of GABA(A), GABA(C) and glycine receptors across the BC pathways. Here we show that different proportions of GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptor-mediated inhibition determined the kinetics of GABAergic presynaptic inhibition across different BC classes. Large, slow GABA(C) and small, fast GABA(A) receptor-mediated inputs to rod BCs prolonged light-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (L-IPSCs), while smaller GABA(C) and larger GABA(A) receptor-mediated contributions produced briefer L-IPSCs in ON and OFF cone BCs. Glycinergic inhibition also varied across BC class. In the rod-dominant conditions studied here, slow glycinergic inputs dominated L-IPSCs in OFF cone BCs, attributable to inputs from the rod pathway via AII amacrine cells, while rod and ON cone BCs received little and no glycinergic input, respectively. As these large glycinergic inputs come from rod signalling pathways, in cone-dominant conditions L-IPSCs in OFF cone bipolar cells will probably be dominated by GABA(A) receptor-mediated input. Thus, unique presynaptic receptor combinations mediate distinct forms of inhibition to selectively modulate BC outputs, enhancing the distinctions among parallel retinal signals.

Propofol modulates inner retina function in Beagles

PURPOSE

To further understand a common veterinary anesthetic, propofol (2,6- di-isopropylphenol) and effects of infusion rates on the retinal neurons in Beagle dogs.

METHODS

Standard full-field blue xenon-flash stimulation elicited responses of dark-adapted eyes, which were recorded from dogs before and after a propofol infusion rate increase.

RESULTS

Electroretinogram b-waves increased significantly after the infusion rate increase and decreased with decline (P < 0.0001). Also, a weak significance (P = 0.041) for a-wave peak amplitude increase was found after infusion rate increase. The initial part (first 18 ms) of the leading edge of the a-wave remained unchanged. No significant differences in times to a- and b-wave peaks were found.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced b-wave response and decline is due to sensitivity of postreceptoral cells, possibly interplexiform and amacrine cells, to propofol concentration.

Patch-clamp investigations and compartmental modeling of rod bipolar axon terminals in an in vitro thin-slice preparation of the mammalian retina

To extend the usefulness of rod bipolar cells for studies of chemical synaptic transmission, we have performed electrophysiological recordings from rod bipolar axon terminals in an in vitro slice preparation of the rat retina. Whole cell recordings from axon terminals and cell bodies were used to investigate the passive membrane properties of rod bipolar cells and analyzed with a two-compartment equivalent electrical circuit model developed by Mennerick et al. For both terminal- and soma-end recordings, capacitive current decays were well fitted by biexponential functions. Computer simulations of simplified models of rod bipolar cells demonstrated that estimates of the capacitance of the axon terminal compartment can depend critically on the recording location, with terminal-end recordings giving the best estimates. Computer simulations and whole cell recordings demonstrated that terminal-end recordings can yield more accurate estimates of the peak amplitude and kinetic properties of postsynaptic currents generated at the axon terminals due to increased electrotonic filtering of these currents when recorded at the soma. Finally, we present whole cell and outside-out patch recordings from axon terminals with responses evoked by GABA and glycine, spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents, voltage-gated Ca(2+) currents, and depolarization-evoked reciprocal synaptic responses, verifying that the recorded axon terminals are involved in normal pre- and postsynaptic relationships. These results demonstrate that axon terminals of rod bipolar cells are directly accessible to whole cell and outside-out patch recordings, extending the usefulness of this preparation for detailed studies of pre- and postsynaptic mechanisms of synaptic transmission in the CNS.

Receptor and transmitter release properties set the time course of retinal inhibition

Synaptic inhibition is determined by the properties of postsynaptic receptors, neurotransmitter release, and clearance, but little is known about how these factors shape sensation-evoked inhibition. The retina is an ideal system to investigate inhibition because it can be activated physiologically with light, and separate inhibitory pathways can be assayed by recording from rod bipolar cells that possess distinct glycine, GABA(A), and GABA(C) receptors (R). We show that receptor properties differentially shape spontaneous IPSCs, whereas both transmitter release and receptor properties shape light-evoked (L) IPSCs. GABA(C)R-mediated IPSCs decayed the slowest, whereas glycineR- and GABA(A)R-mediated IPSCs decayed more rapidly. Slow GABA(C)Rs determined the L-IPSC decay, whereas GABA(A)Rs and glycineRs, which mediated rapid onset responses, determined the start of the L-IPSC. Both fast and slow inhibitory inputs distinctly shaped the output of rod bipolar cells. The slow GABA(C)Rs truncated glutamate release, making the A17 amacrine cell L-EPSCs more transient, whereas the fast GABA(A)R and glycineRs reduced the initial phase of glutamate release, limiting the peak amplitude of the L-EPSC. Estimates of transmitter release time courses suggested that glycine release was more prolonged than GABA release. The time course of GABA release activating GABA(C)Rs was slower than that activating GABA(A)Rs, consistent with spillover activation of GABA(C)Rs. Thus, both postsynaptic receptor and transmitter release properties shape light-evoked inhibition in retina.

Functional segregation of synaptic GABAA and GABAC receptors in goldfish bipolar cell terminals

The transmission of light responses to retinal ganglion cells is regulated by inhibitory input from amacrine cells to bipolar cell (BC) synaptic terminals. GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors in BC terminals mediate currents with different kinetics and are likely to have distinct functions in limiting BC output; however, the synaptic properties and localization of the receptors are currently poorly understood. By recording endogenous GABA receptor currents directly from BC terminals in goldfish retinal slices, I show that spontaneous GABA release activates rapid GABA(A) receptor miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) (predominant decay time constant (tau(decay)), 1.0 ms) in addition to a tonic GABA(C) receptor current. The GABA(C) receptor antagonist (1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)methylphosphinic acid (TPMPA) has no effect on the amplitude or kinetics of the rapid GABA(A) mIPSCs. In addition, inhibition of the GAT-1 GABA transporter, which strongly regulates GABA(C) receptor currents in BC terminals, fails to reveal a GABA(C) component in the mIPSCs. These data suggest that GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors are highly unlikely to be synaptically colocalized. Using non-stationary noise analysis of the mIPSCs, I estimate that GABA(A) receptors in BC terminals have a single-channel conductance (gamma) of 17 pS and that an average of just seven receptors mediates a quantal event. From noise analysis of the tonic current, GABA(C) receptor gamma is estimated to be 4 pS. Identified GABA(C) receptor mIPSCs exhibit a slow decay (tau(decay), 54 ms) and are mediated by approximately 42 receptors. The distinct properties and localization of synaptic GABA(A) and GABA(C) receptors in BC terminals are likely to facilitate their specific roles in regulating the transmission of light responses in the retina.

Characterization of the glycinergic input to bipolar cells of the mouse retina

Glycine and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) are the major inhibitory transmitters of the mammalian retina, and bipolar cells receive GABAergic and glycinergic inhibition from multiple amacrine cell types. Here we evaluated the functional properties and subunit composition of glycine receptors (GlyRs) in bipolar cells. Patch-clamp recordings were performed from retinal slices of wild-type, GlyRalpha1-deficient (Glra1(spd-ot)) and GlyRalpha3-deficient (Glra3(-/-)) mice. Whole-cell currents following glycine application and spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) were analysed. During the recordings the cells were filled with Alexa 488 and, thus, unequivocally identified. Glycine-induced currents of bipolar cells were picrotoxinin-insensitive and thus represent heteromeric channels composed of alpha and beta subunits. Glycine-induced currents and IPSCs were absent from all bipolar cells of Glra1(spd-ot) mice, indicating that GlyRalpha1 is an essential subunit of bipolar cell GlyRs. By comparing IPSCs of bipolar cells in wild-type and Glra3(-/-) mice, no statistically significant differences were found. OFF-cone bipolar (CB) cells receive a strong glycinergic input from AII amacrine cells, that is preferentially based on the fast alpha1beta-containing channels (mean decay time constant tau = 5.9 +/- 1.4 ms). We did not observe glycinergic IPSCs in ON-CB cells and could elicit only small, if any, glycinergic currents. Rod bipolar cells receive a prominent glycinergic input that is mainly mediated by alpha1beta-containing channels (tau = 5.5 +/- 1.6 ms). Slow IPSCs, the characteristic of GlyRs containing the alpha2 subunit, were not observed in bipolar cells. Thus, different bipolar cell types receive kinetically fast glycinergic inputs, preferentially mediated by GlyRs composed of alpha1 and beta subunits.

GABA(A), GABA(C) and glycine receptor-mediated inhibition differentially affects light-evoked signalling from mouse retinal rod bipolar cells

Rod bipolar cells relay visual signals evoked by dim illumination from the outer to the inner retina. GABAergic and glycinergic amacrine cells contact rod bipolar cell terminals, where they modulate transmitter release and contribute to the receptive field properties of third order neurones. However, it is not known how these distinct inhibitory inputs affect rod bipolar cell output and subsequent retinal processing. To determine whether GABA(A), GABA(C) and glycine receptors made different contributions to light-evoked inhibition, we recorded light-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (L-IPSCs) from rod bipolar cells mediated by each pharmacologically isolated receptor. All three receptors contributed to L-IPSCs, but their relative roles differed; GABA(C) receptors transferred significantly more charge than GABA(A) and glycine receptors. We determined how these distinct inhibitory inputs affected rod bipolar cell output by recording light-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (L-EPSCs) from postsynaptic AII and A17 amacrine cells. Consistent with their relative contributions to L-IPSCs, GABA(C) receptor activation most effectively reduced the L-EPSCs, while glycine and GABA(A) receptor activation reduced the L-EPSCs to a lesser extent. We also found that GABAergic L-IPSCs in rod bipolar cells were limited by GABA(A) receptor-mediated inhibition between amacrine cells. We show that GABA(A), GABA(C) and glycine receptors mediate functionally distinct inhibition to rod bipolar cells, which differentially modulated light-evoked rod bipolar cell output. Our findings suggest that modulating the relative proportions of these inhibitory inputs could change the characteristics of rod bipolar cell output.

Localization of glycine receptor alpha subunits on bipolar and amacrine cells in primate retina

The major inhibitory neurotransmitter glycine is used by about half of the amacrine cells in the retina. Amacrine cells provide synaptic output to bipolar, ganglion, and other amacrine cells. The present study investigated whether different bipolar and amacrine cell types in the primate retina differ with respect to the expression of glycine receptor (GlyR) subtypes. Antibodies specific for the alpha1, alpha2, and alpha3 subunits of the GlyR were combined with immunohistochemical markers for bipolar and amacrine cells and applied to vertical sections of macaque (Macaca fascicularis) and marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) retinae. For all subunits, punctate immunoreactivity was expressed in the inner plexiform layer. The GlyRalpha2 immunoreactive (IR) puncta occur at the highest density, followed by GlyR(alpha)3 and GlyR(alpha)1 IR puncta. Postembedding electron microscopy showed the postsynaptic location of all subunits. Double immunofluorescence demonstrated that the three alpha subunits are clustered at different postsynaptic sites. Two OFF cone bipolar cell types (flat midget and diffuse bipolar DB3), are predominantly associated with the alpha1 subunit. Two ON bipolar cell types, the DB6 and the rod bipolar cell, are predominantly associated with the alpha2 subunit. The glycinergic AII amacrine cell is presynaptic to the alpha1 subunit in the OFF-sublamina, and postsynaptic to the alpha2 subunit in the ON-sublamina. Another putative glycinergic cell, the vesicular glutamate transporter 3 cell, is predominantly presynaptic to the alpha2 subunit. The dopaminergic amacrine cell expresses the alpha3 subunit at a low density.