1
|
Tröster AI. Developments in the prediction of cognitive changes following deep brain stimulation in persons with Parkinson's disease. Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:643-659. [PMID: 38814926 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2024.2360121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) motor symptoms that improves function and quality of life in appropriately selected patients. Because mild to moderate cognitive declines can follow DBS and impact quality of life in a minority of patients, an important consideration involves the cognitive deficit and its prediction. AREAS COVERED The author briefly summarizes cognitive outcomes from DBS and reviews in more detail the risks/predictors of post-DBS cognitive dysfunction by mainly focusing on work published between 2018 and 2024 and using comprehensive neuropsychological (NP) evaluations. Most publications concern bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Comment is offered on challenges and potential avenues forward. EXPERT OPINION STN DBS is relatively safe cognitively but declines occur especially in verbal fluency and executive function/working memory. Numerous predictors and risk factors for cognitive outcomes have been identified (age and pre-operative neuropsychological status appear the most robust) but precise risk estimates cannot yet be confidently offered. Future studies should employ study center consortia, follow uniform reporting criteria (to be developed), capitalize on advances in stimulation, biomarkers, and artificial intelligence, and address DBS in diverse groups. Advances offer an avenue to investigate the amelioration of cognitive deficits in PD using neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander I Tröster
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology and Center for Neuromodulation, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Angelopoulou E, Stanitsa E, Karpodini CC, Bougea A, Kontaxopoulou D, Fragkiadaki S, Koros C, Georgakopoulou VE, Fotakopoulos G, Koutedakis Y, Piperi C, Papageorgiou SG. Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Depression in Parkinson's Disease: An Updated Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:1454. [PMID: 37629744 PMCID: PMC10456434 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59081454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
Depression represents one of the most common non-motor disorders in Parkinson's disease (PD) and it has been related to worse life quality, higher levels of disability, and cognitive impairment, thereby majorly affecting not only the patients but also their caregivers. Available pharmacological therapeutic options for depression in PD mainly include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants; meanwhile, agents acting on dopaminergic pathways used for motor symptoms, such as levodopa, dopaminergic agonists, and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors, may also provide beneficial antidepressant effects. Recently, there is a growing interest in non-pharmacological interventions, including cognitive behavioral therapy; physical exercise, including dance and mind-body exercises, such as yoga, tai chi, and qigong; acupuncture; therapeutic massage; music therapy; active therapy; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for refractory cases. However, the optimal treatment approach for PD depression is uncertain, its management may be challenging, and definite guidelines are also lacking. It is still unclear which of these interventions is the most appropriate and for which PD stage under which circumstances. Herein, we aim to provide an updated comprehensive review of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for depression in PD, focusing on recent clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Finally, we discuss the pharmacological agents that are currently under investigation at a clinical level, as well as future approaches based on the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the onset of depression in PD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efthalia Angelopoulou
- 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (E.S.); (A.B.); (D.K.); (S.F.); (C.K.)
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Evangelia Stanitsa
- 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (E.S.); (A.B.); (D.K.); (S.F.); (C.K.)
| | - Claire Chrysanthi Karpodini
- Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK;
| | - Anastasia Bougea
- 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (E.S.); (A.B.); (D.K.); (S.F.); (C.K.)
| | - Dionysia Kontaxopoulou
- 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (E.S.); (A.B.); (D.K.); (S.F.); (C.K.)
| | - Stella Fragkiadaki
- 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (E.S.); (A.B.); (D.K.); (S.F.); (C.K.)
| | - Christos Koros
- 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (E.S.); (A.B.); (D.K.); (S.F.); (C.K.)
| | | | - George Fotakopoulos
- Department of Neurosurgery, General University Hospital of Larissa, 41221 Larissa, Greece;
| | - Yiannis Koutedakis
- Functional Architecture of Mammals in Their Environment Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, 38221 Volos, Greece;
| | - Christina Piperi
- Department of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Sokratis G. Papageorgiou
- 1st Department of Neurology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, 11528 Athens, Greece; (E.A.); (E.S.); (A.B.); (D.K.); (S.F.); (C.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petersen JJ, Juul S, Jørgensen CK, Gluud C, Jakobsen JC. Deep brain stimulation for neurological disorders: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of randomised clinical trials. Syst Rev 2022; 11:218. [PMID: 36229825 PMCID: PMC9558400 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02095-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep brain stimulation has been used since the 1980s for neurological disorders and the USA and Europe have now approved it for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dystonia, and epilepsy. Previous reviews have assessed the effects of deep brain stimulation on different neurological disorders. These reviews all had methodological limitations. METHODS This is a protocol for a systematic review based on searches of major medical databases (e.g. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and clinical trial registries. Two review authors will independently extract data and conduct risk of bias assessment. We will include published and unpublished randomised clinical trial comparing deep brain stimulation versus no intervention, usual care, sham stimulation, medical treatment, or resective surgery for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dystonia, or epilepsy. The effects of deep brain stimulation will be analysed separately for each of the different diagnoses. Primary outcomes will be all-cause mortality, disease-specific symptoms, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be quality of life, depressive symptoms, executive functioning, level of functioning, and non-serious adverse events. Data will be analysed using fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analyses and Trial Sequential Analysis. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool-version 2, an eight-step procedure to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). DISCUSSION Deep brain stimulation is increasingly being used for different neurological diseases, and the effects are unclear based on previous evidence. There is a need for a comprehensive systematic review of the current evidence. This review will provide the necessary background for weighing the benefits against the harms when assessing deep brain stimulation as intervention for individual neurological disorders. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO 306,556.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanne Juul Petersen
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Sophie Juul
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Caroline Kamp Jørgensen
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Gluud
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 3, Odense C, 5000, Odense, Denmark
| | - Janus Christian Jakobsen
- Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 19, 3, Odense C, 5000, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bandopadhyay R, Mishra N, Rana R, Kaur G, Ghoneim MM, Alshehri S, Mustafa G, Ahmad J, Alhakamy NA, Mishra A. Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies for Levodopa-Induced Dyskinesia in Parkinson’s Disease: A Perspective Through Preclinical and Clinical Evidence. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:805388. [PMID: 35462934 PMCID: PMC9021725 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.805388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second leading neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by severe locomotor abnormalities. Levodopa (L-DOPA) treatment has been considered a mainstay for the management of PD; however, its prolonged treatment is often associated with abnormal involuntary movements and results in L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID). Although LID is encountered after chronic administration of L-DOPA, the appearance of dyskinesia after weeks or months of the L-DOPA treatment has complicated our understanding of its pathogenesis. Pathophysiology of LID is mainly associated with alteration of direct and indirect pathways of the cortico-basal ganglia-thalamic loop, which regulates normal fine motor movements. Hypersensitivity of dopamine receptors has been involved in the development of LID; moreover, these symptoms are worsened by concurrent non-dopaminergic innervations including glutamatergic, serotonergic, and peptidergic neurotransmission. The present study is focused on discussing the recent updates in molecular mechanisms and therapeutic approaches for the effective management of LID in PD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritam Bandopadhyay
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India
| | - Nainshi Mishra
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India
| | - Ruhi Rana
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India
| | - Gagandeep Kaur
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, India
| | - Mohammed M. Ghoneim
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, AlMaarefa University, Ad Diriyah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sultan Alshehri
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Gulam Mustafa
- College of Pharmacy (Boys), Al-Dawadmi Campus, Shaqra University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Javed Ahmad
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia
| | - Nabil. A. Alhakamy
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Awanish Mishra
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER)—Guwahati, Guwahati, India
- *Correspondence: Awanish Mishra, ,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bucur M, Papagno C. Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: A Meta-analysis of the Long-term Neuropsychological Outcomes. Neuropsychol Rev 2022; 33:307-346. [PMID: 35318587 PMCID: PMC10148791 DOI: 10.1007/s11065-022-09540-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidum internus (GPi) improves motor functions in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) but may cause a decline in specific cognitive domains. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the long-term (1-3 years) effects of STN or GPi DBS on four cognitive functions: (i) memory (delayed recall, working memory, immediate recall), (ii) executive functions including inhibition control (Color-Word Stroop test) and flexibility (phonemic verbal fluency), (iii) language (semantic verbal fluency), and (iv) mood (anxiety and depression). Medline and Web of Science were searched, and studies published before July 2021 investigating long-term changes in PD patients following DBS were included. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed using the R software to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) computed as Hedges' g with 95% CI. 2522 publications were identified, 48 of which satisfied the inclusion criteria. Fourteen meta-analyses were performed including 2039 adults with a clinical diagnosis of PD undergoing DBS surgery and 271 PD controls. Our findings add new information to the existing literature by demonstrating that, at a long follow-up interval (1-3 years), both positive effects, such as a mild improvement in anxiety and depression (STN, Hedges' g = 0,34, p = 0,02), and negative effects, such as a decrease of long-term memory (Hedges' g = -0,40, p = 0,02), verbal fluency such as phonemic fluency (Hedges' g = -0,56, p < 0,0001), and specific subdomains of executive functions such as Color-Word Stroop test (Hedges' g = -0,45, p = 0,003) were observed. The level of evidence as qualified with GRADE varied from low for the pre- verses post-analysis to medium when compared to a control group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madalina Bucur
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Costanza Papagno
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences (CIMeC), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jahanshahi M, Leimbach F, Rawji V. Short and Long-Term Cognitive Effects of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease and Identification of Relevant Factors. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2022; 12:2191-2209. [PMID: 36155529 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-223446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) successfully controls the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) but has associated cognitive side-effects. OBJECTIVE Establish the short- and long-term cognitive effects of STN-DBS in PD. METHODS Both the short-term and long-term effects of STN-DBS on cognition were examined through evaluation of the controlled studies that compared patients with STN-DBS to unoperated PD patients, thus controlling for illness progression. We also reviewed the literature to identify the factors that influence cognitive outcome of STN-DBS in PD. RESULTS The meta-analysis of the short-term cognitive effects of STN-DBS revealed moderate effect sizes for semantic and phonemic verbal fluency and small effect sizes for psychomotor speed and language, indicating greater decline in the STN-DBS operated than the unoperated patients in these cognitive domains. The longer-term STN-DBS results from controlled studies indicated rates of cognitive decline/dementia up to 32%; which are no different from the rates from the natural progression of PD. Greater executive dysfunction and poorer memory pre-operatively, older age, higher pre-operative doses of levodopa, and greater axial involvement are some of the factors associated with worse cognition after STN-DBS in PD. CONCLUSION This evidence can be used to inform patients and their families about the short-term and long-term risks of cognitive decline following STN-DBS surgery and aid the team in selection of suitable candidates for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjan Jahanshahi
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Friederike Leimbach
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Vishal Rawji
- Unit of Functional Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, The National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Current treatment of behavioral and cognitive symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019; 59:65-73. [PMID: 30852149 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive and behavioral symptoms are common in Parkinson's disease, may occur even in the prodromal stages of the disease, worsen with disease progression, and surpass motor symptoms as the major factors affecting patient quality of life and caregiver burden. The symptoms may be caused by the disease pathology or they may represent adverse effects of treatment, or both etiological factors may contribute. Although many of these symptoms are related to dopaminergic dysfunction or dopaminergic medication, other neurotransmitters are involved as well. Behavioral symptoms including impulse control disorders, apathy, psychosis, as well as mild cognitive impairment and dementia are reviewed with a special focus on current treatment approaches.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sarno M, Gaztanaga W, Banerjee N, Bure-Reyes A, Rooks J, Margolesky J, Luca C, Singer C, Moore H, Jagid J, Levin B. Revisiting eligibility for deep brain stimulation: Do preoperative mood symptoms predict outcomes in Parkinson's disease patients? Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019; 63:131-136. [PMID: 30799236 DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Anxiety and depression are common in PD, occurring in an estimated 30%-40% of PD patients. However, the extent to which these emotional symptoms interfere with Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) outcomes is not well established. This study examined the association between pre-operative emotional well-being and postsurgical cognitive, emotional, and motor performance in PD. METHODS Forty-nine PD patients underwent neurological, neuropsychological (global cognition, processing speed, language, visuospatial, memory), and emotional assessments pre- and post-DBS. Fifteen patients were administered the UPDRS. Patients were divided into Anxious (Anx; n = 21), Comorbid Anxious and Depressed (Anx + Dep; n = 15), and Emotionally Asymptomatic (EA; n = 13) based on BAI and BDI-II cutoffs, and compared on pre-post changes in neurocognitive, mood, and motor scores using analyses of covariance (ANCOVA), controlling for education, ethnicity, and disease duration. RESULTS Pre-DBS, there were no significant differences between the three groups on any neuropsychological measure. Overall change from pre-to post-DBS revealed declines on multiple cognitive measures and lower symptom endorsement on the BAI among all participants. No group differences were observed on neurocognitive measures, mood, or UPDRS. CONCLUSIONS PD patients with mild-moderate anxiety or comorbid anxiety/depression pre-DBS do not show greater cognitive, emotional, and motor changes post-DBS compared to emotionally asymptomatic patients. These data emphasize the importance of discussing potential DBS outcomes, while keeping in mind that psychiatric comorbidity should not necessarily exclude patients from DBS. The notion that premorbid mood symptoms could disqualify a candidate for surgery would be a disservice, as this group performs comparably to asymptomatic peers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Sarno
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA.
| | - Wendy Gaztanaga
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Nikhil Banerjee
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Annelly Bure-Reyes
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Joshua Rooks
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Jason Margolesky
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Corneliu Luca
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Carlos Singer
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Henry Moore
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Jonathan Jagid
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| | - Bonnie Levin
- University of Miami, Department of Neurology, 1150 NW 14th Street Miami, 33136, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Papo D. Neurofeedback: Principles, appraisal, and outstanding issues. Eur J Neurosci 2019; 49:1454-1469. [PMID: 30570194 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Neurofeedback is a form of brain training in which subjects are fed back information about some measure of their brain activity which they are instructed to modify in a way thought to be functionally advantageous. Over the last 20 years, neurofeedback has been used to treat various neurological and psychiatric conditions, and to improve cognitive function in various contexts. However, in spite of a growing popularity, neurofeedback protocols typically make (often covert) assumptions on what aspects of brain activity to target, where in the brain to act and how, which have far-reaching implications for the assessment of its potential and efficacy. Here we critically examine some conceptual and methodological issues associated with the way neurofeedback's general objectives and neural targets are defined. The neural mechanisms through which neurofeedback may act at various spatial and temporal scales, and the way its efficacy is appraised are reviewed, and the extent to which neurofeedback may be used to control functional brain activity discussed. Finally, it is proposed that gauging neurofeedback's potential, as well as assessing and improving its efficacy will require better understanding of various fundamental aspects of brain dynamics and a more precise definition of functional brain activity and brain-behaviour relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Papo
- SCALab, CNRS, Université de Lille, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tröster AI. Some Clinically Useful Information that Neuropsychology Provides Patients, Carepartners, Neurologists, and Neurosurgeons About Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2018; 32:810-828. [PMID: 29077802 PMCID: PMC5860398 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acx090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective (but non-curative) treatment for some of the motor symptoms and treatment complications associated with dopaminergic agents in Parkinson's disease (PD). DBS can be done relatively safely and is associated with quality of life gains. In most DBS centers, neuropsychological evaluations are performed routinely before surgery, and sometimes after surgery. The purpose of such evaluation is not to decide solely on its results whether or not to offer DBS to a given candidate, but to provide the patient and treatment team with the best available information to make reasonable risk-benefit assessments. This review provides information relevant to the questions often asked by patients and their carepartners, neurologists, and neurosurgeons about neuropsychological outcomes of DBS, including neuropsychological adverse event rates, magnitude of cognitive changes, outcomes after unilateral versus bilateral surgery directed at various targets, impact of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) on outcome, factors implicated in neurobehavioral outcomes, and safety of newer interventions or techniques such as asleep surgery and current steering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander I Tröster
- Department of Clinical Neuropsychology and Center for Neuromodulation, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kubu CS. The Role of a Neuropsychologist on a Movement Disorders Deep Brain Stimulation Team. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2018; 33:365-374. [PMID: 29718080 PMCID: PMC7328472 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acx130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The term movement disorders is misleading in the implication that the symptoms are limited to motor problems. Most movement disorders include a variety of neurobehavioral and neurocognitive symptoms that require neuropsychological expertise. The goal of this paper is to provide a rationale and practical roadmap for neuropsychologists' involvement in a Movement Disorders team with a specific focus on pre-operative deep brain stimulation (DBS) evaluations. Pragmatic recommendations regarding requisite skills, clinical practice, recommendations, communication, and benefits are outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia S Kubu
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Cleveland Clinic
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Negida A, Elminawy M, El Ashal G, Essam A, Eysa A, Abd Elalem Aziz M. Subthalamic and Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease. Cureus 2018; 10:e2232. [PMID: 29713577 PMCID: PMC5919761 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 02/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical treatment in which stimulation electrodes are permanently implanted in basal ganglia to treat motor fluctuations and symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) are the commonly used targets for DBS in PD. Many studies have compared motor and non-motor outcomes of DBS in both targets. However, the selection of PD patients for DBS targets is still poorly studied. Therefore, we performed this narrative review to summarize published studies comparing STN DBS and GPi DBS. GPi DBS is better for patients with problems in speech, mood, or cognition while STN DBS is better from an economic point of view as it allows much reduction in antiparkinson medications and less battery consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Negida
- Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt, Zagazig University, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Elminawy
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Athar Eysa
- Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kubu CS, Ford PJ. Clinical Ethics in the Context of Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2017; 32:829-839. [PMID: 29028865 PMCID: PMC5860076 DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acx088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Discuss common clinical ethical challenges encountered in working with patients who are candidates for deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). METHOD The relevant literature is reviewed and supplemented by descriptive, ethically challenging cases stemming from decades of combined experience working on DBS teams. We outline ethical arguments and provide pragmatic recommendations to assist neuropsychologists working in movement disorder teams. RESULTS The goals of the pre-operative neuropsychological DBS assessment include: (1) identification of potential cognitive risk factors; (2) identification of relevant neuropsychiatric or neurobehavioral factors; (3) assessment of level of family support; and (4) systematic assessment of patient's and family member's goals or expectations for DBS. The information gleaned from the pre-operative neuropsychological assessment is highly relevant to the most commonly studied clinical ethics challenges encountered in DBS: (1) assessment of risk/benefit; (2) determinations regarding inclusion/exclusion; (3) autonomy; and (4) patient's perception of benefit and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Neuropsychologists are particularly well poised to provide unique and important insights to assist with developing the most ethically sound practices that take into account patient's values as well as fiduciary responsibilities to the patient, the team, the profession, and the broader community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia S Kubu
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
- Department of Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - Paul J Ford
- Center for Neurological Restoration, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
- Department of Bioethics, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schrag A, Taddei RN. Depression and Anxiety in Parkinson's Disease. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2017; 133:623-655. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2017.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|