Do Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Improve when Patients Receive Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Co-morbid Anxiety Disorders in a Primary Care Psychological Therapy (IAPT) Service? Behav Cogn Psychother. 2017;45:433-447. [PMID: 28478779 DOI: 10.1017/s1352465817000200]

Psychotherapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Psychotherapy has many forms, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness therapy (MFT), and hypnotherapy, to name a few. Cognitive behavioral therapy is the gold standard in therapy-based treatment and is used for cognitive restructuring to reduce safety-seeking and avoidant behaviors. While the main application of psychotherapy is psychological disorders, recent studies have found that it is beneficial for somatic and physiological symptoms such as chronic pain or even irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Irritable bowel syndrome is a common but debilitating gastrointestinal condition that has a prevalence of 12% in the United States and costs the average patient $9,776 annually in 2023. Irritatable bowel syndrome is a condition of exclusion but consists of abdominal discomfort or pain and must be associated with altered bowel habits as stated in the Rome IV criteria. At least half of these patients also exhibit extracolonic symptoms, most commonly psychological disorders like anxiety and stress. The true etiology of IBS is not understood, but ideas such as the brain-gut axis, stress response system, and gut microbiota have been evaluated. Treatment of IBS is extensive and heavily relies on the patient-physician interaction, but pharmacologic therapies have been employed and are sometimes unsuccessful. Irritable bowel syndrome impacts an individual as a whole, making them hesitate whether or not they eat a particular food or even go out to do an activity because of the unpredictable bowel pattern. Finding a better solution is essential to improving the patient's quality of life (QoL), especially by addressing how they perceive the illness, how they adjust to it, and even how they determine what foods to consume. This paper aims to evaluate whether or not psychotherapy can be employed to improve all aspects of IBS, as well as if it can reduce the cost of IBS treatment.

Serotonin transporter and cholecystokinin in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: Associations with abdominal pain, visceral hypersensitivity and psychological performance

BACKGROUND

Visceral hypersensitivity and psychological performance are the main pathophysiological mechanisms of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Previous studies have found that cholecystokinin (CCK) can enhance colon movement and that serotonin transporter (SERT) is a transmembrane transport protein with high affinity for 5-hydroxytryptamine, which can rapidly reuptake 5-hydroxytryptamine and then regulate its action time and intensity. We speculate that SERT and CCK might play a role in the pathogenesis of diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D) by affecting visceral sensitivity and the brain-gut axis.

AIM

To determine SERT and CCK levels in IBS-D patients diagnosed using Rome IV criteria and to analyze their associations with abdominal pain, visceral hypersensitivity and psychological performance.

METHODS

This study collected data from 40 patients with IBS-D at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital from September 2017 to April 2018 and 18 healthy controls. The severity of abdominal pain, visceral sensitivity and psychological performance were evaluated in IBS-D patients and healthy controls, the levels of SERT and CCK in plasma and colonic mucosa were evaluated, and the correlations between them were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the initial sensation threshold (31.00 ± 8.41 mL vs 52.22 ± 8.09 mL, P < 0.001), defecating sensation threshold (51.75 ± 13.57 mL vs 89.44 ± 8.73 mL, P < 0.001) and maximum tolerable threshold (97.25 ± 23.64 mL vs 171.11 ± 20.83 mL, P < 0.001) between the two groups. IBS-D patients had more severe anxiety (7.78 ± 2.62 vs 2.89 ± 1.02, P < 0.001) and depressive (6.38 ± 2.43 vs 2.06 ± 0.73, P < 0.001) symptoms than healthy controls. Significant differences were also found in mucosal CCK (2.29 ± 0.30 vs 1.66 ± 0.17, P < 0.001) and SERT (1.90 ± 0.51 vs 3.03 ± 0.23, P < 0.001) between the two groups. There was a significant positive correlation between pain scores and mucosal CCK (r = 0.96, 0.93, 0.94, P < 0.001). Significant negative correlations between anxiety (r = -0.98; P < 0.001), depression (r = -0.99; P < 0.001), pain evaluation (r = -0.96, -0.93, -0.95, P < 0.001) and mucosal SERT were observed.

CONCLUSION

IBS-D patients had psychosomatic disorders and visceral hypersensitivity. SERT and CCK might be involved in the pathogenesis of IBS-D by regulating the brain-gut axis and affecting visceral sensitivity. This provides a new potential method for identifying a more specific and effective therapeutic target.

Anxiety Disorders and Medical Comorbidity: Treatment Implications

Anxiety disorders are debilitating psychological disorders characterized by a wide range of cognitive and somatic symptoms. Anxiety sufferers have a higher lifetime prevalence of various medical problems. Chronic medical conditions furthermore increase the likelihood of psychiatric disorders and overall dysfunction. Lifetime rates of cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and other medical problems are disproportionately high in anxiety and panic/fear sufferers. The heightened comorbidity is not surprising as many symptoms of anxiety and panic/fear mimic symptoms of medical conditions. Panic disorder specifically is strongly linked to medical conditions due to its salient somatic symptoms, such as dyspnea, dizziness, numbness, chest pain, and heart palpitations, all of which can signal danger and deterioration for chronic disease sufferers. This chapter identifies shared correlates of medical illness and anxiety disorders and evidence for misinterpretation of symptoms as medically relevant and offers an analysis of implications for treatment of both types of conditions. We will concentrate on medical conditions with high associations for anxiety and panic by aspects of symptomatology, specifically neurological disorders (fibromyalgia, epilepsy, cerebral palsy), diabetes, gastrointestinal illness (irritable bowel syndrome, gastroesophageal reflux disease), and cardiovascular and respiratory illnesses (asthma).

Cognitive and Behavioral Differences Between Subtypes in Refractory Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal syndrome consisting of different bowel pattern subtypes: diarrhea predominant (IBS-D), constipation predominant (IBS-C), and alternating (IBS-A). This paper aimed to identify whether (a) psychological factors implicated in the cognitive behavioral model of IBS were differentially associated with bowel pattern subtypes, (b) whether there were differences in symptom severity and work and social adjustment across the IBS-subtypes. Analysis was conducted on baseline data of 557 individuals with refractory IBS recruited into the Assessing Cognitive Therapy in Irritable Bowel (ACTIB) randomized controlled trial. Correlations assessed the associations between psychological factors, stool patterns, symptom severity, and work and social adjustment. Hierarchical regressions identified whether cognitive and behavioral factors were significantly associated with frequency of loose/watery stools, hard/lumpy stools and symptom severity while controlling for affective (anxiety and depression) and demographic factors (age, gender, symptom duration). One-way ANOVAs were conducted to assess differences across Rome III classified subtypes (IBS-A, D and C) in cognitive, behavioral, affective, symptom severity, and adjustment measures. Psychological factors were significantly associated with symptom severity and work and social adjustment. Increased avoidance behavior and unhelpful gastrointestinal (GI) cognitions were significantly associated with higher frequency of loose/watery stools. Increased control behaviors were associated with higher frequency of hard/lumpy stools. Cognitive and behavioral differences were significant across the Rome III classified IBS subtypes. There were no differences in anxiety, depression, overall symptom severity, or work and social adjustment. The results are discussed in terms of their utility in tailoring cognitive behavioral treatments to IBS subtypes.