The effect of immunization against somatostatin and β-agonist administration alone and in combination on growth and carcass composition in young steers

Efficacy and Safety of Nasal Immunisation with Somatostatin DNA Vaccine for Growth Promotion in Fattening Pigs

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SS DNA vaccine on growing pigs. Randomly, 147 pigs were divided into four groups, treatment 1 (T1, 3 × 109 CFU/mL, n = 39), T2 (3 × 108 CFU/mL, n = 35), T3 (3 × 107 CFU/mL, n = 35) and control group (phosphate-buffered saline, n = 38). All animals received two vaccinations separated by 45 days and the same diet and management. The results showed that all treatment groups (T1, T2 and T3) had significantly higher slaughter weight (d 185) than the Ctrl group (p < 0.05), and daily gain between 50 and 110 days of age was significantly higher in all treatment groups than in the Ctrl group (p < 0.05). Antibody-positive pigs have significantly higher daily weight gain than that in antibody-negative pigs (p < 0.05). The results of the meat quality analysis showed no significant changes between the P (antibody-positive pigs) and N (antibody-negative pigs) groups. Furthermore, the results showed that antibody titres at 110 and 185 days had a significant positive correlation with the daily weight gain (p < 0.05) and a significant negative correlation with the backfat thickness (p < 0.05). Evaluating the safety of vaccines by PCR amplification of target genes (GS/2SS), faecal, soil and water samples had no target genes detected by PCR amplification in these samples after 5 days, and no GS/2SS were detected in the blood and tissues for the experimental period. Moreover, no abnormalities were found in pathological sections of the P group compared with the N group. In conclusion, SS DNA vaccines can promote the growth of fattening pigs to a certain extent without altering the meat quality, and it has no effects on the safety of the surrounding environment.

Oral and intranasal administration of somatostatin DNA vaccine mediated by attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium to promote growth of piglets

An attenuated strain of Salmonella typhimurium has been used as a carrier for oral and intranasal genetic immunization. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of a vaccine strain of S. typhimurium. CSO22 (pGM-CSF/SS, plasmid granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/somatostatin) expressing two copies of SS genes. A total of 115 piglets, aged 2 months old, were either orally or intranasally immunized against the vaccine strain CSO22 (pGM-CSF/SS) with three dosages (5 × 10(10) colony forming units (CFU), 5 × 10(9) CFU and 5 × 10(8) CFU). For oral immunization, the specific anti-SS antibodies were detected in the immunized piglets. The levels of SS antibodies in the high-dose immunized group (5 × 10(10) CFU) were significantly higher than that in the phosphate buffered saline immunized group (P < 0.01) and 40% of animals were positive in SS antibodies in the high-dose immunized group. Moreover, the weight gain of the high-dose group was increased by 20.86%, 10.26% and 15.30% during 4, 8 and 12 weeks, respectively, after immunization in comparison to the control. For intranasal immunization, the growth of the low-dose group was increased by 10.23% in the whole test period (12 weeks). In conclusion, our results suggest that the recombinant strain could elicit anti-SS antibodies and improve the growth performance of immunized piglets, and that the oral immunization program is better than the intranasal program.

Construction of a fusion protein expression vector pGS/2SS-M4GFP without antibiotic resistance gene and its subcellular localization in different cell lines

A novel plasmid pGS/2SS-M4GFP was constructed in the present study by recombination of GS/2SS gene and enhanced green fluorescent protein (M4GFP) sequence. The GS/2SS fusion gene encoding two copies of somatostatin genes was firstly introduced into pVAX-asd vector in which the kanamycin resistance cassette was replaced by the asd cassette. The M4GFP gene was then fused into 3' end of GS/2SS gene in the proper reading frame. After purified, plasmid pGS/2SS-M4GFP was transfected into different cell lines derived from pig kidney and human cancer cells. The transcription process of GS/2SS gene was confirmed by RT-PCR, and the localization as well as expression of GS/2SS-M4GFP fusion protein was observed by confocal microscopy and ELISA. Transfection results revealed that sole M4GFP was localized within the cytosol and the nucleus, while fusion protein GS/2SS-M4GFP was localized only in the cytoplasm. Furthermore, it should be noted that subcellular localization of GS/2SS-M4GFP was not specific to one cell line, but appeared to be common across a variety of cell lines. These results provide for the first time valuable evidence that M4GFP is a versatile tool to trace GS/2SS protein and pave the way for further study on its tissue distribution and immunological mechanism in vivo.

Effects of gastric inhibitory polypeptide, somatostatin and epidermal growth factor on lipogenesis in ovine adipose explants

Feeding raises the plasma concentrations of a number of gut-related hormones that may, in turn, influence the metabolism of peripheral tissues. This study investigated the effects of gut-related hormones on lipogenesis in explants from three differing adipose depots in lambs (aged 4-9 months). Incorporation of [14C]-acetate into lipid was measured over a 2-h period, following 24 h pre-incubation in the presence of hormone combinations. In perirenal fat explants, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in the concentration range 0.01-10 nM stimulated lipogenesis. Maximal effects were seen at 1 nM (an average increase of 64% over basal values). In contrast, in the presence of insulin (0.1 nM), a dose-dependent decrease in lipogenesis was seen with increasing GIP concentration (P < 0.001 for the insulin x GIP interaction). Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and somatostatin in the same concentration range each inhibited lipogenesis. both in the presence and the absence of insulin (P < 0.001 in each case). Subcutaneous (back) fat and intermuscular (popliteal) fat responded similarly to each other, but significantly differently from the perirenal depot (P < 0.001). Here GIP, somatostatin or EGF (each at 1 nM) all separately stimulated lipogenesis.