Struggling for normality: experiences of patients with diabetic lower extremity amputations and post-amputation wounds in primary care

The impact of stigma on the management of type 1 diabetes: A systematic review

AIMS

To systematically review the literature investigating the links between stigma and the management of type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Both quantitative and qualitative data were considered. Included papers were subject to quality assessment using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), and a narrative synthesis of results was reported.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Amongst these, one study used mixed methods, nine were qualitative, and nine were quantitative. All studies found a negative relationship between stigma and type 1 diabetes management. Qualitative studies provided a further understanding of the effects observed in the quantitative studies and found that stigma can affect self-care activities, disclosure of diabetes, and the uptake of diabetes technology. Systemic causes of stigma and intersectional stigma were also observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights that people with type 1 diabetes are negatively affected by stigma, irrespective of their age, gender, culture, or use of diabetes technology. Quantitative studies were limited, in that all studies were cross-sectional, and there was a lack of standardisation across outcome measures. There is a need for interventions to target stigma on both an individual and a systemic level, particularly where people experience multiple intersecting stigmas.

Comorbidity and risk factors of subsequent lower extremity amputation in patients diagnosed with diabetes in Saskatchewan, Canada

OBJECTIVE

Subsequent limb amputation (SLA) may be necessary due to disease progression, infection, or to aid prosthesis fit. SLA in Saskatchewan has increased 3.2% from 2006 to 2019 with minor SLA increasing 9.6% during that period. Diabetes affects a large proportion of patients who require SLA; however, the impact of additional comorbidities is not clear.

METHODS

First-episode subsequent lower extremity limb amputation (SLEA) cases with the presence/absence of diabetes, other comorbidities, and demographic characteristics from 2006-2019 were retrieved from Saskatchewan's Discharge Abstract Database. Logistic regression was performed to examine the magnitude of the odds of SLEA.

RESULTS

Among the 956 first-episode SLEA patients investigated, 78.8% were diagnosed with diabetes. Of these, 76.1% were male and 83.0% were aged 50 + years. Three comorbidities: renal failure (AOR = 1.9, 95% Cl 1.1 - 3.0), hypertension (AOR = 3.0, 95% Cl 2.0 - 4.5), and congestive heart failure (AOR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.2 - 3.2), conferred the highest odds of SLEA. The odds of SLEA is greatest for those aged 50-69 years, males, Registered Indians, and associated with a prolonged hospital stay.

DISCUSSION

These data are important as they may help medical providers identify patients at the highest risk of SLEA and target interventions to optimize outcomes.

"I know what I'm supposed to do, but I don't do it": patient-perceived risk factors that lead to their lower extremity amputations

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to extend on our previous research by exploring patient-perceived factors that lead to their Lower Extremity Amputations (LEA). LEA are a serious complication of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), LEA are thought to be preventable with early detection and management of risk factors. Our previous study identified that these factors extend beyond the typical biological and modifiable risk factors and may also extend to patient awareness and competing priorities. Therefore, this research explored these issues in further detail, identifying patient-perceived factors that lead to their LEA.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive methodology involving non-probability purposive sampling was used to recruit inpatients at a tertiary metropolitan hospital in South Australia. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were transcribed verbatim. Data from the interviews were analysed using thematic analysis and the constant comparison approach.

RESULTS

A total of 15 participants shared their perspectives of risk factors for LEA. Two main themes emerged: intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Intrinsic factors identified in this study included identity, ambivalence, denial, inevitability, and helplessness. Extrinsic factors related to resources, rapport with healthcare professionals, and management of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Through identifying that a combination of perceived personal attributes (intrinsic) and system-level (extrinsic) factors likely contribute to LEA, this study highlights the complexity of factors that contribute to patients' perceptions of what led to their diabetes related LEA. These findings support the importance of a nuanced approach in managing patients with diabetes who are at risk of LEA as it's likely patients' personal circumstances, day-to-day life's requirements and responsibilities, their interaction with healthcare professionals all seemingly contribute to how risks are viewed and managed. Tackling this challenge will require reimagining diabetes care, acknowledgement of risk factors beyond the obvious and addressing persistent access and workforce issues.

What Factors Make EU Regulators Want to Communicate Drug Safety Issues Related to SGLT2 Inhibitors? An Online Survey Study

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have found differences in the communication of safety issues among medicines regulatory agencies.

OBJECTIVES

To explore (1) to what extent regulators' opinions regarding the need to communicate safety issues related to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors might be influenced by their concern about the safety issue, and (2) whether regulators' concerns might be influenced by certain characteristics of the safety issue or by the demographic and professional characteristics and attitudes of the regulators.

METHODS

An online cross-sectional survey study with a rating-based conjoint analysis among clinical and pharmacovigilance assessors from the EU regulatory network was performed between April and June 2021. Regulators were invited by email, and participants were asked about their level of concern and their opinion regarding the need to communicate about 12 scenarios defined by four characteristics: adverse drug reaction, source of information, causality, and frequency. The outcomes for the first objective were to update the summary of product characteristics (SmPC; yes/no) and to send direct healthcare professional communications (DHPC; yes/no). The determinant was regulators' level of concern (range 0-100%). The outcome of the second objective was regulators' level of concern, and the determinants were the characteristics of the safety issue, demographic and professional characteristics, and attitudes of the regulators (beliefs about medicines and risk perception).

RESULTS

A total of 222 regulators completed the survey (64% women; mean age 46 ± 10 years). Depending on the scenario, 54-94% and 25-74% of the participants would update the SmPC or send a DHPC, respectively. The participants' level of concern influenced their opinions regarding the need to update the SmPC and send a DHPC (odds ratio (OR) 13.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-21.7 and OR 13.6; 95% CI 9.5-19.2, respectively, for every 10% increase in the level of concern). All characteristics of the safety issue influenced the level of concern. Younger participants, women, and those working for Eastern European agencies had a higher level of concern than older participants, men, and those working in other regions. Beliefs about medicines and general risk perception also influenced their concern.

CONCLUSIONS

The opinion regarding the need to communicate safety issues was influenced by the concern of regulators. Regulators' concern was influenced by the characteristics of the safety issue, demographic characteristics, and attitudes. Diverse groups of experts regarding such factors would ensure that various views are incorporated in risk communication decisions.

Factors Associated with Healing Outcomes in Primary Care Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Study in a Multiethnic Sample

OBJECTIVE

To identify and determine patient- and ulcer-related factors associated with healing outcomes within 3 months for patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) in a multiethnic primary care sample.

METHODS

Retrospective data were collected over 3 months from 520 primary care patients with a DFU between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2017. Multivariable prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated using Poisson regression to find associations between patient- and ulcer-related factors and healing outcomes.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (66%) and Chinese (49.8%) and had a diabetes mellitus duration longer than 5 years (81.8%). Toe ulcers (64%) were most common. Healing occurred for 33.9% of participants; 19.1% and 1.5% underwent minor and major amputation, respectively. Wound sizes between 1 and 10 cm2 (PR, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-0.76; P < .001) and over 10 cm2 (PR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33-0.76; P = .003), ulcer duration 6 months or longer (PR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.53; P < .001), ischemic ulcers (PR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.22-0.86; P = .044), and neuroischemic ulcers (PR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53-0.93; P = .027) were negatively associated with healing outcomes. Women were more likely to experience healing (PR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.91-1.45; P = .157).

CONCLUSIONS

Ulcer healing varied by sex and was affected by wound size, wound duration, and ischemic etiology, regardless of ethnicity. Prompt attention to these risk factors may reduce healing time. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the mechanism underlying sex differences in association with DFU healing.

Psychological Consequences in Patients With Amputation of a Limb. An Interpretative-Phenomenological Analysis

The study aimed to identify the psychological changes that result from the amputation of a limb and the ways in which patients coordinate their daily lives. The study uses an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) aimed at understanding individual experiences in seven patients who have suffered limb amputation. The method used consisted of individual, semi-structured interviews, conducted approximately 4 months after surgery, to patients at home or in hospital, at the time of their regular checkup. The interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and, following the qualitative analysis performed, six common themes were identified: emotional impact, negative affects, tendency toward isolation, role constraints and limitations, phantom limb, and emotional balancing. A specific theme for patients who have suffered amputations is phantom limb pain, which has received special attention from researchers. The last topic relates to the tendency toward emotional balancing and psychological calibration to return to normal life.