1
|
Toyama M, Mori H, Kuriyama A, Sano M, Imura H, Nishimura M, Nakayama T. Challenges of using body bags for COVID-19 deaths from the healthcare provider perspective - a qualitative study. BMJ Open Qual 2024; 13:e002548. [PMID: 38290757 PMCID: PMC10828837 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND During the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous issues regarding end-of-life care for COVID-19 patients have been discussed. Among these issues, challenges related to the use of body bags following the death of COVID-19 patients have been suggested. This study aimed to identify the challenges faced by healthcare professionals (HCPs) when using body bags after the death of patients infected with COVID-19 in medical settings. METHODS We conducted a qualitative descriptive study with semistructured in-depth interviews using inductive thematic analysis. From August to December 2021, we interviewed nurses and doctors who provided end-of-life care to COVID-19 patients focusing on their experiences with the use of body bags for the deceased. RESULTS Of the 25 interviewees who mentioned body bag use, 14 were nurses (56%) and 13 were women (52%). The mean interview length was 52.0 min (SD 9.6 min). Challenges associated with body bag use were classified into four themes with eight categories: preserving the dignity of the deceased, consideration for the bereaved saying a final goodbye to a loved one in a body bag, the physical and emotional impact on HCPs, and diverse opinions on body bag use. CONCLUSION Our findings include ethical concerns about the dignity of the deceased, empathy for the grief of bereaved families, and the emotional and physical distress experienced by HCPs struggling with the recommendation to use body bags based on limited evidence. The diverse perspectives of HCPs in this study highlight potential issues that developers should consider when formulating more appropriate and acceptable guidelines/guidance and policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayumi Toyama
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroko Mori
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
- Section of Epidemiology, Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Akira Kuriyama
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Makiko Sano
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Bukkyo University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Haruki Imura
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Mayumi Nishimura
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takeo Nakayama
- Department of Health Informatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine and Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Inokuchi R, Hanari K, Shimada K, Iwagami M, Sakamoto A, Sun Y, Mayers T, Sugiyama T, Tamiya N. Barriers to and facilitators of advance care planning implementation for medical staff after the COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of reviews. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075969. [PMID: 37816562 PMCID: PMC10565150 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the capacity for advance care planning (ACP) among patients, families and healthcare teams. We sought to identify and review the barriers to and facilitators of ACP implementation for medical staff in different settings (eg, hospitals, outpatient palliative care, nursing and care homes) during the pandemic. DESIGN This study employed an overview of reviews design. We searched the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science and Embase databases for studies published between 8 December 2019 and 30 July 2023. We used AMSTAR 2 to assess the risk of bias. RESULTS We included seven reviews. Common barriers to ACP implementation included visitation restrictions, limited resources and personnel and a lack of coordination among healthcare professionals. In care and nursing homes, barriers included a dearth of palliative care physicians and the psychological burden on facility staff. Using telemedicine for information sharing was a common facilitator across settings. In hospitals, facilitators included short-term training in palliative care and palliative care physicians joining the acute care team. In care and nursing homes, facilitators included ACP education and emotional support for staff. CONCLUSIONS Visitation restrictions and limited resources during the pandemic posed obstacles; however, the implementation of ACP was further hindered by insufficient staff education on ACP in hospitals and facilities, as well as a scarcity of information sharing at the community level. These pre-existing issues were magnified by the pandemic, drawing attention to their significance. Short-term staff training programmes and immediate information sharing could better enable ACP. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42022351362.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Inokuchi
- Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Kyoko Hanari
- Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Hinohara Memorial Peace House Hospital, Nakai, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kensuke Shimada
- Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Masao Iwagami
- Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ayaka Sakamoto
- Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yu Sun
- Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Thomas Mayers
- Medical English Communications Center, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takehiro Sugiyama
- Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Institute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Diabetes and Metabolism Information Center, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nanako Tamiya
- Department of Health Services Research, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schmidt-Hellerau K, Raichle C, Ruethrich MM, Vehreschild JJ, Lanznaster J, Nunes de Miranda SM, Bausewein C, Vehreschild MJGT, Koll CEM, Simon ST, Hellwig K, Jensen BEO, Jung N. Specialized palliative care for hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: an analysis of the LEOSS registry. Infection 2023:10.1007/s15010-023-02020-z. [PMID: 36952127 PMCID: PMC10034879 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-023-02020-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Symptom control for patients who were severely ill or dying from COVID-19 was paramount while resources were strained and infection control measures were in place. We aimed to describe the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients who received specialized palliative care (SPC) and the type of SPC provided in a larger cohort. METHODS From the multi-centre cohort study Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (LEOSS), data of patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection documented between July 2020 and October 2021 were analysed. RESULTS 273/7292 patients (3.7%) received SPC. Those receiving SPC were older and suffered more often from comorbidities, but 59% presented with an estimated life expectancy > 1 year. Main symptoms were dyspnoea, delirium, and excessive tiredness. 224/273 patients (82%) died during the hospital stay compared to 789/7019 (11%) without SPC. Symptom control was provided most common (223/273; 95%), followed by family and psychological support (50% resp. 43%). Personal contact with friends or relatives before or during the dying phase was more often documented in patients receiving SPC compared to patients without SPC (52% vs. 30%). CONCLUSION In 3.7% of SARS-CoV-2 infected hospitalized patients, the burden of the acute infection triggered palliative care involvement. Besides complex symptom management, SPC professionals also focused on psychosocial and family issues and aimed to enable personal contacts of dying patients with their family. The data underpin the need for further involvement of SPC in SARS-CoV-2 infected patients but also in other severe chronic infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten Schmidt-Hellerau
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Claudia Raichle
- Department of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Maria M Ruethrich
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Haematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Jörg J Vehreschild
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department II of Internal Medicine, Haematology/Oncology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Lanznaster
- Department II of Internal Medicine, Hospital Passau, Passau, Germany
| | - Susana M Nunes de Miranda
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital Munich, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria J G T Vehreschild
- German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Bonn-Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany
| | - Carolin E M Koll
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Steffen T Simon
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hellwig
- Department of Neurology, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Björn-Erik O Jensen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Norma Jung
- Department I of Internal Medicine, University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gauder S, Pralong A, Rémi C, Hodiamont F, Klinger I, Heckel M, Simon ST, Bausewein C. Development of a national strategy with recommendations for the care of seriously ill and dying people and their relatives in pandemics: A modified Delphi study. Palliat Med 2022; 36:1285-1295. [PMID: 36062725 PMCID: PMC9446431 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221114536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is a constant challenge for health care systems, also in Germany. Care of seriously ill and dying people and their relatives is often neglected and suffering increased due to sub-optimal symptom management, visiting restrictions and lonely dying. The project "Palliative Care in Pandemics (PallPan)" intended to develop a national strategy including evidence- and consensus-based recommendations for the care of seriously ill and dying people and their relatives during pandemic times in Germany. AIM To reach consensus on evidence-based recommendations for the care of seriously ill and dying people and their relatives in pandemics. METHODS Three-step consensus process comprising two online Delphi rounds and an expert workshop conducted from April to June 2021. One hundred twenty experts from various areas of healthcare, administration, and politics in Germany were included. RESULTS During the consensus-process, pre-formulated evidence-based recommendations were refined step-by-step. This resulted in consensus on 33 recommendations on the topics of "supporting patients and their relatives," "supporting staff," and "supporting and maintaining structures and provision of palliative care." The recommendations address professional carers and various responsibilities on a governmental, federal state and municipal level, and in healthcare facilities. CONCLUSION We provide evidence and consensus-based recommendations for the care of seriously ill and dying people and their relatives in pandemics in Germany. This is an important step towards a pandemic preparedness and hopefully improves the future palliative care response to pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Gauder
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich University Hospital, Germany
| | - Anne Pralong
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Palliative Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Constanze Rémi
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich University Hospital, Germany
| | - Farina Hodiamont
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich University Hospital, Germany
| | - Isabell Klinger
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maria Heckel
- Department of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
| | - Steffen T Simon
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Department of Palliative Medicine and Center for Integrated Oncology, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich University Hospital, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Strategies Addressing the Challenges of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Long-Term, Palliative and Hospice Care: A Qualitative Study on the Perspectives of Patients’ Family Members. REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/reports5030026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients in long-term, palliative, and hospice care are at increased risk of a severe course of COVID-19. For purposes of infection control, different strategies have been implemented by the respective health care facilities, also comprising visitation and other forms of contact restrictions. The aim of the present study was to examine how these strategies are perceived by family members of patients in these settings. An exploratory, qualitative approach was used to examine perceptions of policies and strategies using partially standardized guided interviews analyzed by means of a thematic approach. Interviews were conducted with 10 family members of long-term, palliative, and hospice care patients. Interviewees were between 30 and 75 years old. Because of the pandemic-related measures, respondents felt that their basic rights were restricted. Results indicate that perceptions of strategies and interventions in long-term, palliative, and hospice care facilities are particularly influenced by the opportunity to visit and the number of visitors allowed. Strict bans on visits, particularly during end-of-life care, are associated with a strong emotional burden for patients and family members alike. Aside from sufficient opportunities for visits, virtual communication technologies need to be utilized to facilitate communication between patients, families, and caregivers.
Collapse
|