Label-Free Quantification from Direct Infusion Shotgun Proteome Analysis (DISPA-LFQ) with CsoDIAq Software

Comprehensive Overview of Bottom-Up Proteomics Using Mass Spectrometry

Proteomics is the large scale study of protein structure and function from biological systems through protein identification and quantification. "Shotgun proteomics" or "bottom-up proteomics" is the prevailing strategy, in which proteins are hydrolyzed into peptides that are analyzed by mass spectrometry. Proteomics studies can be applied to diverse studies ranging from simple protein identification to studies of proteoforms, protein-protein interactions, protein structural alterations, absolute and relative protein quantification, post-translational modifications, and protein stability. To enable this range of different experiments, there are diverse strategies for proteome analysis. The nuances of how proteomic workflows differ may be challenging to understand for new practitioners. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of different proteomics methods. We cover from biochemistry basics and protein extraction to biological interpretation and orthogonal validation. We expect this Review will serve as a handbook for researchers who are new to the field of bottom-up proteomics.

Rapid Plasma Proteome Profiling via Nanoparticle Protein Corona and Direct Infusion Mass Spectrometry

Noninvasive detection of protein biomarkers in plasma is crucial for clinical purposes. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is the gold standard technique for plasma proteome analysis, but despite recent advances, it remains limited by throughput, cost, and coverage. Here, we introduce a new hybrid method that integrates direct infusion shotgun proteome analysis (DISPA) with nanoparticle (NP) protein corona enrichment for high-throughput and efficient plasma proteomic profiling. We realized over 280 protein identifications in 1.4 min collection time, which enables a potential throughput of approximately 1000 samples daily. The identified proteins are involved in valuable pathways, and 44 of the proteins are FDA-approved biomarkers. The robustness and quantitative accuracy of this method were evaluated across multiple NPs and concentrations with a mean coefficient of variation of 17%. Moreover, different protein corona profiles were observed among various NPs based on their distinct surface modifications, and all NP protein profiles exhibited deeper coverage and better quantification than neat plasma. Our streamlined workflow merges coverage and throughput with precise quantification, leveraging both DISPA and NP protein corona enrichment. This underscores the significant potential of DISPA when paired with NP sample preparation techniques for plasma proteome studies.

Ultrafast Proteomics

Current stage of proteomic research in the field of biology, medicine, development of new drugs, population screening, or personalized approaches to therapy dictates the need to analyze large sets of samples within the reasonable experimental time. Until recently, mass spectrometry measurements in proteomics were characterized as unique in identifying and quantifying cellular protein composition, but low throughput, requiring many hours to analyze a single sample. This was in conflict with the dynamics of changes in biological systems at the whole cellular proteome level upon the influence of external and internal factors. Thus, low speed of the whole proteome analysis has become the main factor limiting developments in functional proteomics, where it is necessary to annotate intracellular processes not only in a wide range of conditions, but also over a long period of time. Enormous level of heterogeneity of tissue cells or tumors, even of the same type, dictates the need to analyze biological systems at the level of individual cells. These studies involve obtaining molecular characteristics for tens, if not hundreds of thousands of individual cells, including their whole proteome profiles. Development of mass spectrometry technologies providing high resolution and mass measurement accuracy, predictive chromatography, new methods for peptide separation by ion mobility and processing of proteomic data based on artificial intelligence algorithms have opened a way for significant, if not radical, increase in the throughput of whole proteome analysis and led to implementation of the novel concept of ultrafast proteomics. Work done just in the last few years has demonstrated the proteome-wide analysis throughput of several hundred samples per day at a depth of several thousand proteins, levels unimaginable three or four years ago. The review examines background of these developments, as well as modern methods and approaches that implement ultrafast analysis of the entire proteome.

Are We There Yet? Assessing the Readiness of Single-Cell Proteomics to Answer Biological Hypotheses

Single-cell analysis is an active area of research in many fields of biology. Measurements at single-cell resolution allow researchers to study diverse populations without losing biologically meaningful information to sample averages. Many technologies have been used to study single cells, including mass spectrometry-based single-cell proteomics (SCP). SCP has seen a lot of growth over the past couple of years through improvements in data acquisition and analysis, leading to greater proteomic depth. Because method development has been the main focus in SCP, biological applications have been sprinkled in only as proof-of-concept. However, SCP methods now provide significant coverage of the proteome and have been implemented in many laboratories. Thus, a primary question to address in our community is whether the current state of technology is ready for widespread adoption for biological inquiry. In this Perspective, we examine the potential for SCP in three thematic areas of biological investigation: cell annotation, developmental trajectories, and spatial mapping. We identify that the primary limitation of SCP is sample throughput. As proteome depth has been the primary target for method development to date, we advocate for a change in focus to facilitate measuring tens of thousands of single-cell proteomes to enable biological applications beyond proof-of-concept.

The Future of Proteomics is Up in the Air: Can Ion Mobility Replace Liquid Chromatography for High Throughput Proteomics?

The coevolution of liquid chromatography (LC) with mass spectrometry (MS) has shaped contemporary proteomics. LC hyphenated to MS now enables quantification of more than 10,000 proteins in a single injection, a number that likely represents most proteins in specific human cells or tissues. Separations by ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) have recently emerged to complement LC and further improve the depth of proteomics. Given the theoretical advantages in speed and robustness of IMS in comparison to LC, we envision that ongoing improvements to IMS paired with MS may eventually make LC obsolete, especially when combined with targeted or simplified analyses, such as rapid clinical proteomics analysis of defined biomarker panels. In this perspective, we describe the need for faster analysis that might drive this transition, the current state of direct infusion proteomics, and discuss some technical challenges that must be overcome to fully complete the transition to entirely gas phase proteomics.

Exploiting Charge State Distribution To Probe Intramolecular Interactions in Gas-Phase Phosphopeptides and Enhance Proteomics Analyses

Charging of analytes is a prerequisite for performing mass spectrometry analysis. In proteomics, electrospray ionization is the dominant technique for this process. Although the observation of differences in the peptide charge state distribution (CSD) is well-known among experimentalists, its analytical value remains underexplored. To investigate the utility of this dimension, we analyzed several public data sets, comprising over 250,000 peptide CSD profiles from the human proteome. We found that the dimensions of the CSD demonstrate high reproducibility across multiple laboratories, mass analyzers, and extensive time intervals. The general observation was that the CSD enabled effective partitioning of the peptide property space, resulting in enhanced discrimination between sequence and constitutional peptide isomers. Next, by evaluating the CSD values of phosphorylated peptides, we were able to differentiate between phosphopeptides that indicate the formation of intramolecular structures in the gas phase and those that do not. The reproducibility of the CSD values (mean cosine similarity above 0.97 for most of the experiments) qualified CSD data suitable to train a deep-learning model capable of accurately predicting CSD values (mean cosine similarity - 0.98). When we applied the CSD dimension to MS1- and MS2-based proteomics experiments, we consistently observed around a 5% increase in protein and peptide identification rate. Even though the CSD dimension is not as effective a discriminator as the widely used retention time dimension, it still holds the potential for application in direct infusion proteomics.