1
|
Harrill JA, Everett LJ, Haggard DE, Word LJ, Bundy JL, Chambers B, Harris F, Willis C, Thomas RS, Shah I, Judson R. Signature analysis of high-throughput transcriptomics screening data for mechanistic inference and chemical grouping. Toxicol Sci 2024; 202:103-122. [PMID: 39177380 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2024] Open
Abstract
High-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) uses gene expression profiling to characterize the biological activity of chemicals in in vitro cell-based test systems. As an extension of a previous study testing 44 chemicals, HTTr was used to screen an additional 1,751 unique chemicals from the EPA's ToxCast collection in MCF7 cells using 8 concentrations and an exposure duration of 6 h. We hypothesized that concentration-response modeling of signature scores could be used to identify putative molecular targets and cluster chemicals with similar bioactivity. Clustering and enrichment analyses were conducted based on signature catalog annotations and ToxPrint chemotypes to facilitate molecular target prediction and grouping of chemicals with similar bioactivity profiles. Enrichment analysis based on signature catalog annotation identified known mechanisms of action (MeOAs) associated with well-studied chemicals and generated putative MeOAs for other active chemicals. Chemicals with predicted MeOAs included those targeting estrogen receptor (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), retinoic acid receptor (RAR), the NRF2/KEAP/ARE pathway, AP-1 activation, and others. Using reference chemicals for ER modulation, the study demonstrated that HTTr in MCF7 cells was able to stratify chemicals in terms of agonist potency, distinguish ER agonists from antagonists, and cluster chemicals with similar activities as predicted by the ToxCast ER Pathway model. Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) embedding of signature-level results identified novel ER modulators with no ToxCast ER Pathway model predictions. Finally, UMAP combined with ToxPrint chemotype enrichment was used to explore the biological activity of structurally related chemicals. The study demonstrates that HTTr can be used to inform chemical risk assessment by determining in vitro points of departure, predicting chemicals' MeOA and grouping chemicals with similar bioactivity profiles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A Harrill
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Logan J Everett
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Derik E Haggard
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Laura J Word
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Joseph L Bundy
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Bryant Chambers
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Felix Harris
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) National Student Services Contractor, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, United States
| | - Clinton Willis
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Russell S Thomas
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Imran Shah
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| | - Richard Judson
- Center for Computational Toxicology & Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27711, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vinik Y, Maimon A, Raj H, Dubey V, Geist F, Wienke D, Lev S. Computational pipeline predicting cell death suppressors as targets for cancer therapy. iScience 2024; 27:110859. [PMID: 39310772 PMCID: PMC11416655 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.110859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Identification of promising targets for cancer therapy is a global effort in precision medicine. Here, we describe a computational pipeline integrating transcriptomic and vulnerability responses to cell-death inducing drugs, to predict cell-death suppressors as candidate targets for cancer therapy. The prediction is based on two modules; the transcriptomic similarity module to identify genes whose targeting results in similar transcriptomic responses of the death-inducing drugs, and the correlation module to identify candidate genes whose expression correlates to the vulnerability of cancer cells to the same death-inducers. The combined predictors of these two modules were integrated into a single metric. As a proof-of-concept, we selected ferroptosis inducers as death-inducing drugs in triple negative breast cancer. The pipeline reliably predicted candidate genes as ferroptosis suppressors, as validated by computational methods and cellular assays. The described pipeline might be used to identify repressors of various cell-death pathways as potential therapeutic targets for different cancer types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaron Vinik
- Molecular Cell Biology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Avi Maimon
- Molecular Cell Biology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Harsha Raj
- Molecular Cell Biology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Vinay Dubey
- Molecular Cell Biology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| | - Felix Geist
- The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Dirk Wienke
- The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Sima Lev
- Molecular Cell Biology Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meier MJ, Harrill J, Johnson K, Thomas RS, Tong W, Rager JE, Yauk CL. Progress in toxicogenomics to protect human health. Nat Rev Genet 2024:10.1038/s41576-024-00767-1. [PMID: 39223311 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-024-00767-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Toxicogenomics measures molecular features, such as transcripts, proteins, metabolites and epigenomic modifications, to understand and predict the toxicological effects of environmental and pharmaceutical exposures. Transcriptomics has become an integral tool in contemporary toxicology research owing to innovations in gene expression profiling that can provide mechanistic and quantitative information at scale. These data can be used to predict toxicological hazards through the use of transcriptomic biomarkers, network inference analyses, pattern-matching approaches and artificial intelligence. Furthermore, emerging approaches, such as high-throughput dose-response modelling, can leverage toxicogenomic data for human health protection even in the absence of predicting specific hazards. Finally, single-cell transcriptomics and multi-omics provide detailed insights into toxicological mechanisms. Here, we review the progress since the inception of toxicogenomics in applying transcriptomics towards toxicology testing and highlight advances that are transforming risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Meier
- Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joshua Harrill
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kamin Johnson
- Predictive Safety Center, Corteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Russell S Thomas
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Weida Tong
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicological Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, AR, USA
- Curriculum in Toxicology & Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Julia E Rager
- Curriculum in Toxicology & Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- The Center for Environmental Medicine, Asthma and Lung Biology, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- The Institute for Environmental Health Solutions, Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Carole L Yauk
- Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heintz MM, Klaren WD, East AW, Haws LC, McGreal SR, Campbell RR, Thompson CM. Comparison of transcriptomic profiles between HFPO-DA and prototypical PPARα, PPARγ, and cytotoxic agents in mouse, rat, and pooled human hepatocytes. Toxicol Sci 2024; 200:165-182. [PMID: 38574381 PMCID: PMC11199992 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Like many per- or polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS), toxicity studies with HFPO-DA (ammonium, 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)-propanoate), a short-chain PFAS used in the manufacture of some types of fluorinated polymers, indicate that the liver is the primary target of toxicity in rodents following oral exposure. Although the current weight of evidence supports the PPARα mode of action (MOA) for liver effects in HFPO-DA-exposed mice, alternate MOAs have also been hypothesized including PPARγ or cytotoxicity. To further evaluate the MOA for HFPO-DA in rodent liver, transcriptomic analyses were conducted on samples from primary mouse, rat, and pooled human hepatocytes treated for 12, 24, or 72 h with various concentrations of HFPO-DA, or agonists of PPARα (GW7647), PPARγ (rosiglitazone), or cytotoxic agents (ie, acetaminophen or d-galactosamine). Concordance analyses of enriched pathways across chemicals within each species demonstrated the greatest concordance between HFPO-DA and PPARα agonist GW7647-treated hepatocytes compared with the other chemicals evaluated. These findings were supported by benchmark concentration modeling and predicted upstream regulator results. In addition, transcriptomic analyses across species demonstrated a greater transcriptomic response in rodent hepatocytes treated with HFPO-DA or agonists of PPARα or PPARγ, indicating rodent hepatocytes are more sensitive to HFPO-DA or PPARα/γ agonist treatment. These results are consistent with previously published transcriptomic analyses and further support that liver effects in HFPO-DA-exposed rodents are mediated through rodent-specific PPARα signaling mechanisms as part of the MOA for PPARα activator-induced rodent hepatocarcinogenesis. Thus, effects observed in mouse liver are not appropriate endpoints for toxicity value development for HFPO-DA in human health risk assessment.
Collapse
|
5
|
Chambers BA, Basili D, Word L, Baker N, Middleton A, Judson RS, Shah I. Searching for LINCS to Stress: Using Text Mining to Automate Reference Chemical Curation. Chem Res Toxicol 2024; 37:878-893. [PMID: 38736322 PMCID: PMC11447707 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Adaptive stress response pathways (SRPs) restore cellular homeostasis following perturbation but may activate terminal outcomes like apoptosis, autophagy, or cellular senescence if disruption exceeds critical thresholds. Because SRPs hold the key to vital cellular tipping points, they are targeted for therapeutic interventions and assessed as biomarkers of toxicity. Hence, we are developing a public database of chemicals that perturb SRPs to enable new data-driven tools to improve public health. Here, we report on the automated text-mining pipeline we used to build and curate the first version of this database. We started with 100 reference SRP chemicals gathered from published biomarker studies to bootstrap the database. Second, we used information retrieval to find co-occurrences of reference chemicals with SRP terms in PubMed abstracts and determined pairwise mutual information thresholds to filter biologically relevant relationships. Third, we applied these thresholds to find 1206 putative SRP perturbagens within thousands of substances in the Library of Integrated Network-Based Cellular Signatures (LINCS). To assign SRP activity to LINCS chemicals, domain experts had to manually review at least three publications for each of 1206 chemicals out of 181,805 total abstracts. To accomplish this efficiently, we implemented a machine learning approach to predict SRP classifications from texts to prioritize abstracts. In 5-fold cross-validation testing with a corpus derived from the 100 reference chemicals, artificial neural networks performed the best (F1-macro = 0.678) and prioritized 2479/181,805 abstracts for expert review, which resulted in 457 chemicals annotated with SRP activities. An independent analysis of enriched mechanisms of action and chemical use class supported the text-mined chemical associations (p < 0.05): heat shock inducers were linked with HSP90 and DNA damage inducers to topoisomerase inhibition. This database will enable novel applications of LINCS data to evaluate SRP activities and to further develop tools for biomedical information extraction from the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryant A. Chambers
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Danilo Basili
- Unilever, Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, U.K
| | - Laura Word
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Alistair Middleton
- Unilever, Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, U.K
| | - Richard S. Judson
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Imran Shah
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Godinez WJ, Trifonov V, Fang B, Kuzu G, Pei L, Guiguemde WA, Martin EJ, King FJ, Jenkins JL, Skewes-Cox P. Compound Activity Prediction with Dose-Dependent Transcriptomic Profiles and Deep Learning. J Chem Inf Model 2024; 64:2695-2704. [PMID: 38293736 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Predicting compound activity in assays is a long-standing challenge in drug discovery. Computational models based on compound-induced gene expression signatures from a single profiling assay have shown promise toward predicting compound activity in other, seemingly unrelated, assays. Applications of such models include predicting mechanisms-of-action (MoA) for phenotypic hits, identifying off-target activities, and identifying polypharmacologies. Here, we introduce transcriptomics-to-activity transformer (TAT) models that leverage gene expression profiles observed over compound treatment at multiple concentrations to predict the compound activity in other biochemical or cellular assays. We built TAT models based on gene expression data from a RASL-seq assay to predict the activity of 2692 compounds in 262 dose-response assays. We obtained useful models for 51% of the assays, as determined through a realistic held-out set. Prospectively, we experimentally validated the activity predictions of a TAT model in a malaria inhibition assay. With a 63% hit rate, TAT successfully identified several submicromolar malaria inhibitors. Our results thus demonstrate the potential of transcriptomic responses over compound concentration and the TAT modeling framework as a cost-efficient way to identify the bioactivities of promising compounds across many assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Godinez
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California 94608, United States
| | - Vladimir Trifonov
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, San Diego, California 92121, United States
| | - Bin Fang
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, San Diego, California 92121, United States
| | - Guray Kuzu
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, San Diego, California 92121, United States
| | - Luying Pei
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California 94608, United States
| | - W Armand Guiguemde
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California 94608, United States
| | - Eric J Martin
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California 94608, United States
| | - Frederick J King
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, San Diego, California 92121, United States
| | - Jeremy L Jenkins
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States
| | - Peter Skewes-Cox
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Emeryville, California 94608, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gant TW, Auerbach SS, Von Bergen M, Bouhifd M, Botham PA, Caiment F, Currie RA, Harrill J, Johnson K, Li D, Rouquie D, van Ravenzwaay B, Sistare F, Tralau T, Viant MR, van de Laan JW, Yauk C. Applying genomics in regulatory toxicology: a report of the ECETOC workshop on omics threshold on non-adversity. Arch Toxicol 2023; 97:2291-2302. [PMID: 37296313 PMCID: PMC10322787 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-023-03522-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
In a joint effort involving scientists from academia, industry and regulatory agencies, ECETOC's activities in Omics have led to conceptual proposals for: (1) A framework that assures data quality for reporting and inclusion of Omics data in regulatory assessments; and (2) an approach to robustly quantify these data, prior to interpretation for regulatory use. In continuation of these activities this workshop explored and identified areas of need to facilitate robust interpretation of such data in the context of deriving points of departure (POD) for risk assessment and determining an adverse change from normal variation. ECETOC was amongst the first to systematically explore the application of Omics methods, now incorporated into the group of methods known as New Approach Methodologies (NAMs), to regulatory toxicology. This support has been in the form of both projects (primarily with CEFIC/LRI) and workshops. Outputs have led to projects included in the workplan of the Extended Advisory Group on Molecular Screening and Toxicogenomics (EAGMST) group of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and to the drafting of OECD Guidance Documents for Omics data reporting, with potentially more to follow on data transformation and interpretation. The current workshop was the last in a series of technical methods development workshops, with a sub-focus on the derivation of a POD from Omics data. Workshop presentations demonstrated that Omics data developed within robust frameworks for both scientific data generation and analysis can be used to derive a POD. The issue of noise in the data was discussed as an important consideration for identifying robust Omics changes and deriving a POD. Such variability or "noise" can comprise technical or biological variation within a dataset and should clearly be distinguished from homeostatic responses. Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) were considered a useful framework on which to assemble Omics methods, and a number of case examples were presented in illustration of this point. What is apparent is that high dimension data will always be subject to varying processing pipelines and hence interpretation, depending on the context they are used in. Yet, they can provide valuable input for regulatory toxicology, with the pre-condition being robust methods for the collection and processing of data together with a comprehensive description how the data were interpreted, and conclusions reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy W Gant
- United Kingdom Health Security Agency, Harwell Science Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
- Imperial College London School of Public Health, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Scott S Auerbach
- Division of Translational Toxicology, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, RTP, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Martin Von Bergen
- Department for Molecular Systems Biology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Florian Caiment
- Department of Toxicogenomics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Joshua Harrill
- Cellular and Molecular Toxicologist, Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kamin Johnson
- Predictive Safety Center, Corteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Dongying Li
- National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, 72079, USA
| | - David Rouquie
- Bayer SAS, Bayer Crop Science, 355 Rue Dostoïevski, CS 90153, 06906, Valbonne Sophia-Antipolis, France
| | | | | | - Tewes Tralau
- Department of Pesticides Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany
| | - Mark R Viant
- School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Carole Yauk
- Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|