Novel Synthesis Pathways for Highly Oxidative Iron Species: Generation, Stability, and Treatment Applications of Ferrate(IV/V/VI)

Ferrate (IV) synthesis using derived persulfate during treatment of oil recovery wastewater

Using oil recovery wastewater as the target material, the degradation of organic matter in oilfield wastewater was studied in an anodic oxidation system using Ti/Ru-Ir oxide-coated anode and 0.7mMNa2SO4 as the electrolyte. The TOC of the wastewater was 210 mg/L at the beginning of the electrolysis in the electrolysis system, and it decreased from 210 to 93.6 mg/L after 50 min of electrolysis. Under the action of this system, sulfate was oxidized to persulfate, and the apparent concentration of persulfate was 15.02 mM, oxidation and degradation of organic matter in wastewater by the action of newly generated persulfate.. Afterwards, NaOH and Fe2(SO4)3 were added to the electrolyzed wastewater, and the TOC in the wastewater was further reduced to 25.1 mg/L due to the coagulation effect of the newly generated Fe(OH)3 precipitate. The TOC removal rate of the wastewater treated by this process reached 88.0%, which meets the discharge requirements. At the same time, the derived persulfate oxidized Fe(OH)3 to generate a green substance, which was identified as Na2FeO3 by IR, UV, and XRD analyses. Na2FeO3 served as a highly effective water-purifying agent, demonstrating superior performance when compared to FeO42-. The method reported in this study not only provides a strategy for waste resource recycling but also offers the potential for mass production of ferrate (IV).

Progress and challenges in the use of electrochemical oxidation and reduction processes for heavy metals removal and recovery from wastewaters

Heavy metals-laden industrial wastewater represents both a threat to ecosystems and human health and, in some instances, a potential source of valuable metals however the presence of organic ligands that bind the metals in heavy metal complexes (HMCs) renders metal removal (and, where appropriate, recovery) difficult. Electrochemical-based oxidation and reduction processes represent a potentially promising means of degrading the organic ligands and reducing their ability to retain the metals in solution. In this state-of-the-art review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current status on use of electrochemical redox technologies for organic ligand degradation and subsequent heavy metal removal and recovery from industrial wastewaters. The principles and degradation mechanism of common organic ligands by various types of electrochemical redox technologies are discussed in this review and consideration given to recent progress in electrode materials synthesis, cell architecture, and operation of electrochemical redox systems. Furthermore, we highlight the current challenges in application of electrochemical redox technologies for treatment of HMC-containing wastewaters including (i) limited understanding of the chemical composition of industrial wastewaters, (ii) constrained mass transfer process affecting the direct/indirect electron transfer, (iii) absence of approaches to convert recovered metal into high-value-added products, and (iv) restricted semi-or full-industrial-scale application of these technologies. Potential strategies for improvement are accordingly provided to guide efforts in addressing these challenges in future research.

Research and application of active species based on high-valent iron for the degradation of pollutants: A critical review

Fe(VI), as a new green treatment agent, has two indispensable processes in water treatment: coagulation and oxidation. Fe(VI) has a strong oxidation ability. The intermediate iron species (Fe(V) and Fe(IV)) and reactive radical species (H2O2, •OH, and O2•-) produced by decomposition and reduction reaction have strong oxidation ability, in addition, the hydrolyzed product formed in situ with core (γ-Fe2O3)-shell (γ-FeOOH) structure also has good coagulation effect. Because Fe(VI) is easy to decompose and challenging to preserve, it limits the application and sometimes significantly reduces the subsequent processing effect. How to make Fe(VI) more efficient use is a hot spot in current research. This article summarizes the distribution of active substances during the hydrolysis of Fe(VI), distinguish the differences mechanisms in the similar regulation methods, reviews the current preparation methods of Fe(VI), and finally reviews the applications of Fe(VI) in the field of environmental remediation.

How Should We Activate Ferrate(VI)? Fe(IV) and Fe(V) Tell Different Stories about Fluoroquinolone Transformation and Toxicity Changes

Many studies have investigated activation of ferrate (Fe(VI)) to produce reactive high-valent iron intermediates to enhance the oxidation of micropollutants. However, the differences in the risk of pollutant transformation caused by Fe(IV) and Fe(V) have not been taken seriously. In this study, Fe(VI)-alone, Fe3+/Fe(VI), and NaHCO3/Fe(VI) processes were used to oxidize fluoroquinolone antibiotics to explore the different effects of Fe(IV) and Fe(V) on product accumulation and toxicity changes. The contribution of Fe(IV) to levofloxacin degradation was 99.9% in the Fe3+/Fe(VI) process, and that of Fe(V) was 89.4% in the NaHCO3/Fe(VI) process. The cytotoxicity equivalents of levofloxacin decreased by 1.9 mg phenol/L in the Fe(IV)-dominant process while they significantly (p < 0.05) increased by 4.7 mg phenol/L in the Fe(V)-dominant process. The acute toxicity toward luminescent bacteria and the results for other fluoroquinolone antibiotics also showed that Fe(IV) reduced the toxicity and Fe(V) increased the toxicity. Density functional theory calculations showed that Fe(V) induced quinolone ring opening, which would increase the toxicity. Fe(IV) tended to oxidize the piperazine group, which reduced the toxicity. These results show the different-pollutant transformation caused by Fe(IV) and Fe(V). In future, the different risk outcomes during Fe(VI) activation should be taken seriously.

Unlocking the potential of ferrate(VI) in water treatment: Toward one-step multifunctional solutions

Ferrate(VI), though well-acknowledged for its multiple treatment functions, has traditionally found application in an auxiliary treatment of conventional water treatment trains, primarily targeting specific contaminants. However, the reactor configurations and system operations developed from this traditional approach are not optimally suited for harnessing its full multifunctionality. In contrast, an alternative process integration approach, such as process intensification, can allow for the tailored development of modular, multifunctional ferrate(VI) reactors capable of achieving various treatment objectives within a single unit. This perspective article critically analyzes and compares the two distinct development approaches for ferrate(VI) technology in water treatment. We argue that the process integration pathway represents a promising approach, given that it facilitates the reactor design to accommodate different ferrate(VI)-driven treatment processes and their interactions, while potentially accomplishing enhanced treatment efficiency, reduced costs and energy consumption, and a smaller physical footprint. The resulting system intensification and adaptability have the potential to drive technological innovation and revolution in water treatment for achieving water security.

Electro-Fenton and Induced Electro-Fenton as Versatile Wastewater Treatment Processes for Decontamination and Nutrient Removal without Byproduct Formation

It is a long-pursued goal to develop electrified water treatment technology that can remove contaminants without byproduct formation. This study unveiled the overlooked multifunctionality of electro-Fenton (EF) and induced EF (I-EF) processes to remove organics, pathogens, and phosphate in one step without halogenated byproduct formation. The EF and I-EF processes used a sacrificial anode or an induced electrode to generate Fe2+ to activate H2O2 produced from a gas diffusion cathode fed by naturally diffused air. We used experimental and kinetic modeling approaches to illustrate that the •OH generation and radical speciation during EF were not impacted by chloride. More importantly, reactive chlorine species were quenched by H2O2, which eliminated the formation of halogenated byproducts. When applied in treating septic wastewater, the EF process removed >80% COD, >50% carbamazepine (as representative trace organics), and >99% phosphate at a low energy consumption of 0.37 Wh/L. The EF process also demonstrated broad-spectrum disinfection activities in removing and inactivating Escherichia coli, Enterococcus durans, and model viruses MS2 and Phi6. In contrast to electrochemical oxidation (EO) that yielded mg/L level byproducts to achieve the same degree of treatment, EF did not generate byproducts (chlorate, perchlorate, trihalomethanes, and haloacetic acids). The I-EF carried over all the advantages of EF and exhibited even faster kinetics in disinfection and carbamazepine removal with 50-80% less sludge production. Last, using septic wastewater treatment as a technical niche, we demonstrated that iron sludge formation is predictable and manageable, clearing roadblocks toward on-site water treatment applications.

Selective Removal of Emerging Organic Contaminants from Water Using Electrogenerated Fe(IV) and Fe(V) under Near-Neutral Conditions

Fe(IV) and Fe(V) are promising oxidants for the selective removal of emerging organic contaminants (EOCs) from water under near-neutral conditions. The Fe(III)-assisted electrochemical oxidation system with a BDD anode (Fe(III)-EOS-BDD system) has been employed to generate Fe(VI), while the generation and contributions of Fe(IV) and Fe(V) have been largely ignored. Thus, we examined the feasibility and involved mechanisms of the selective degradation of EOCs in the Fe(III)-EOS-BDD system under near-neutral conditions. It was found that Fe(III) application selectively accelerated the electro-oxidation of phenolic and sulfonamide organics and made the oxidation system be resistant to interference from Cl^-, HCO₃^-, and humic acid. Several lines of evidence indicated that EOCs were decomposed via direct electron-transfer process on the BDD anode and by Fe(IV) and Fe(V) but not Fe(VI), besides HO^•. Fe(VI) was not generated until the exhaustion of EOCs. Furthermore, the overall contributions of Fe(IV) and Fe(V) to the oxidation of phenolic and sulfonamide organics were over 45%. Our results also revealed that Fe(III) was oxidized primarily by HO^• to Fe(IV) and Fe(V) in the Fe(III)-EOS-BDD system. This study advances the understanding of the roles of Fe(IV) and Fe(V) in the Fe(III)-EOS-BDD system and provides an alternative for utilizing Fe(IV) and Fe(V) under near-neutral conditions.