1
|
Wang JL, Barlow B, Funk W, Robinson C, Brandt A, Ravikumar AP. Large-Scale Controlled Experiment Demonstrates Effectiveness of Methane Leak Detection and Repair Programs at Oil and Gas Facilities. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2024. [PMID: 38314689 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
Most jurisdictions around the globe use leak detection and repair (LDAR) programs to find and fix methane leaks from oil and gas operations. In this work, we empirically evaluate the efficacy of LDAR programs using a large-scale, bottom-up, randomized controlled field experiment across ∼200 oil and gas sites in Red Deer, Canada. We find that tanks are the single largest source of emissions, contributing to nearly 60% of the total emissions. The average number of leaks at treatment sites that underwent repair reduced by ∼50% compared to the control sites. Although control sites did not see a reduction in the number of leaks, emissions reduced by approximately 36%, suggesting potential impact of routine maintenance activities to find and fix large leaks. By tracking tags on leaking equipment over time, we find a high degree of persistence; leaks that are repaired remain fixed in follow-up surveys, while non-repaired leaks remain emitting at a similar rate, suggesting that any increase in observed leak emissions following LDAR surveys are likely from new leaks. Our results show that a focus on equipment and sites that are prone to high emissions, such as tanks and oil sites, is key to cost-effective mitigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayang Lyra Wang
- Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States
- Department of Data Science, Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101, United States
| | | | - Wes Funk
- DXD Consulting, Incorporated, Calgary, Alberta T2P 0S5, Canada
| | | | - Adam Brandt
- Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States
| | - Arvind P Ravikumar
- Department of Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Daube C, Herndon SC, Krechmer JE, Johnson D, Clark N, Footer TL, Thoma ED. Quantification of natural gas and other hydrocarbons from production sites in northern West Virginia using tracer flux ratio methodology. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT: X 2023; 19:1-8. [PMID: 37538994 PMCID: PMC10394683 DOI: 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
Tracer flux ratio (TFR) methodology performed downwind of 15 active oil and natural gas production sites in Ohio County, West Virginia sought to quantify air pollutant emissions over two weeks in April 2018. In coordination with a production company, sites were randomly selected depending on wind forecasts and nearby road access. Methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6), and tracer gas compounds (acetylene and nitrous oxide) were measured via tunable infrared direct absorption spectroscopy. Ion signals attributed to benzene (C6H6) and other volatile gases (e.g., C7 - C9 aromatics) were measured via proton-transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Short-term whole facility emission rates for 12 sites are reported. Results from TFR were systematically higher than the sum of concurrent on-site full flow sampler measurements, though not all sources were assessed on-site in most cases. In downwind plumes, the mode of the C2H6:CH4 molar ratio distribution for all sites was 0.2, which agreed with spot sample analysis from the site operator. Distribution of C6H6:CH4 ratios was skew but values between 1 and 5 pptv ppbv-1 were common. Additionally, the aromatic profile has been attributed to condensate storage tank emissions. Average ratios of C7 - C9 to C6H6 were similar to other literature values reported for natural gas wells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conner Daube
- Aerodyne Research, Inc., 45 Manning Road, Billerica, MA 01821, United States
| | - Scott C. Herndon
- Aerodyne Research, Inc., 45 Manning Road, Billerica, MA 01821, United States
| | - Jordan E. Krechmer
- Aerodyne Research, Inc., 45 Manning Road, Billerica, MA 01821, United States
| | - Derek Johnson
- West Virginia University, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, PO Box 6106, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States
| | - Nigel Clark
- West Virginia University, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, PO Box 6106, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States
| | - Tracey L. Footer
- Eastern Research Group, Inc., 601 Keystone Park Drive, Suite 700, Morrisville, NC 27560, United States
| | - Eben D. Thoma
- Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dubey L, Cooper J, Hawkes A. Minimum detection limits of the TROPOMI satellite sensor across North America and their implications for measuring oil and gas methane emissions. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 872:162222. [PMID: 36796684 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2022] [Revised: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Methane emissions from natural gas are of ever-increasing importance as we struggle to reach Paris climate targets. Locating and measuring emissions from natural gas can be particularly difficult as they are often widely distributed across supply chains. Satellites are increasingly used to measure these emissions, with some such as TROPOMI giving daily coverage worldwide, making locating and quantifying these emissions easier. However, there is little understanding of the real-world detection limits of TROPOMI, which can cause emissions to go undetected or be misattributed. This paper uses TROPOMI and meteorological data to calculate, and create a map of, the minimum detection limits of the TROPOMI satellite sensor across North America for different campaign lengths. We then compared these to emission inventories to determine the quantity of emissions that can be captured by TROPOMI. We find that minimum detection limits vary from 500-8800 kg/h/pixel in a single overpass to 50-1200 kg/h/pixel for a yearlong campaign. This leads to 0.04 % of a year's emissions being captured in a single (day) measurement to 14.4 % in a 1-year measurement campaign. Assuming gas sites contain super-emitters, emissions of between 4.5 % - 10.1 % from a single measurement and 35.6 % - 41.1 % for a yearlong campaign are captured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Dubey
- Sustainable Gas Institute, Imperial College London, SW7 1NA London, UK; Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK; Division of Chemical Engineering and Renewable Energy, School of Engineering and Material Science, Queen Mary University, E1 4NS, UK.
| | - Jasmin Cooper
- Sustainable Gas Institute, Imperial College London, SW7 1NA London, UK; Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Adam Hawkes
- Sustainable Gas Institute, Imperial College London, SW7 1NA London, UK; Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moore D, Li NP, Wendt LP, Castañeda SR, Falinski MM, Zhu JJ, Song C, Ren ZJ, Zondlo MA. Underestimation of Sector-Wide Methane Emissions from United States Wastewater Treatment. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2023; 57:4082-4090. [PMID: 36848936 PMCID: PMC10018768 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c05373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
An increasing percentage of US waste methane (CH4) emissions come from wastewater treatment (10% in 1990 to 14% in 2019), although there are limited measurements across the sector, leading to large uncertainties in current inventories. We conducted the largest study of CH4 emissions from US wastewater treatment, measuring 63 plants with average daily flows ranging from 4.2 × 10-4 to 8.5 m3 s-1 (<0.1 to 193 MGD), totaling 2% of the 62.5 billion gallons treated, nationally. We employed Bayesian inference to quantify facility-integrated emission rates with a mobile laboratory approach (1165 cross-plume transects). The median plant-averaged emission rate was 1.1 g CH4 s-1 (0.1-21.6 g CH4 s-1; 10th/90th percentiles; mean 7.9 g CH4 s-1), and the median emission factor was 3.4 × 10-2 g CH4 (g influent 5 day biochemical oxygen demand; BOD5)-1 [0.6-9.9 × 10-2 g CH4 (g BOD5)-1; 10th/90th percentiles; mean 5.7 × 10-2 g CH4 (g BOD5)-1]. Using a Monte Carlo-based scaling of measured emission factors, emissions from US centrally treated domestic wastewater are 1.9 (95% CI: 1.5-2.4) times greater than the current US EPA inventory (bias of 5.4 MMT CO2-eq). With increasing urbanization and centralized treatment, efforts to identify and mitigate CH4 emissions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel
P. Moore
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
| | - Nathan P. Li
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
| | - Lars P. Wendt
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
| | - Sierra R. Castañeda
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
- Now
at Department of Earth Systems Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California94305, United States
| | - Mark M. Falinski
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
- Andlinger
Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton
University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
| | - Jun-Jie Zhu
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
- Andlinger
Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton
University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
| | - Cuihong Song
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
| | - Zhiyong Jason Ren
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
- Andlinger
Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton
University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
| | - Mark A. Zondlo
- Department
of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey08544, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnson D, Clark N, Heltzel R, Darzi M, Footer TL, Herndon S, Thoma ED. Methane emissions from oil and gas production sites and their storage tanks in West Virginia. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT: X 2022; 16:1-11. [PMID: 37091901 PMCID: PMC10116818 DOI: 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
A measurement campaign characterized methane and other emissions from 15 natural gas production sites. Sites were surveyed using optical gas imaging (OGI) cameras to identify fugitive and vented emissions, with the methane mass emission rate quantified using a full flow sampler. We present storage tank emissions in context of all site emissions, followed by a detailed account of the former. In total, 224 well pad emission sources at 15 sites were quantified yielding a total emission rate of 57.5 ± 2.89 kg/hr for all sites. Site specific emissions ranged from 0.4 to 10.5 kg/hr with arithmetic and geometric means of 3.8 and 2.2 kg/hr, respectively. The two largest categories of emissions by mass were pneumatic devices (35 kg/hr or ~61% of total) and tanks (14.3 kg/hr or ~25% of total). Produced water and condensate tanks at all sites employed emissions control devices. Nevertheless, tanks may still lose gas via component leaks as observed in this study. The total number of tanks at all sites was 153. One site experienced a major malfunction and direct tank measurements were not conducted due to safety concerns and may have represented a super-emitter as found in other studies. The remaining sites had 143 tanks, which accounted for 42 emissions sources. Leaks on controlled tanks were associated with ERVs, PRVs, and thief hatches. Since measurements represented snapshots-in-time and could only be compared with modeled tank emission data, it was difficult to assess real capture efficiencies accurately. Our estimates suggest that capture efficiency ranged from 63 to 92% for controlled tanks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Johnson
- West Virginia University, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, PO Box 6106, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
| | - Nigel Clark
- West Virginia University, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, PO Box 6106, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
| | - Robert Heltzel
- West Virginia University, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, PO Box 6106, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
| | - Mahdi Darzi
- West Virginia University, Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, PO Box 6106, Morgantown, WV, 26506, United States
| | - Tracey L. Footer
- Eastern Research Group, Inc., 601 Keystone Park Drive, Suite 700, Morrisville, NC, 27560, United States
| | - Scott Herndon
- Aerodyne, 45 Manning Road, Billerica, MA, 01821, United States
| | - Eben D. Thoma
- Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code E343-02, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27711, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Riddick SN, Cheptonui F, Yuan K, Mbua M, Day R, Vaughn TL, Duggan A, Bennett KE, Zimmerle DJ. Estimating Regional Methane Emission Factors from Energy and Agricultural Sector Sources Using a Portable Measurement System: Case Study of the Denver-Julesburg Basin. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:7410. [PMID: 36236509 PMCID: PMC9572259 DOI: 10.3390/s22197410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Methane (CH4), a powerful greenhouse gas (GHG), has been identified as a key target for emission reduction in the Paris agreement, but it is not currently clear where efforts should be focused to make the greatest impact. Currently, activity data and standard emission factors (EF) are used to generate GHG emission inventories. Many of the EFs are globally uniform and do not account for regional variability in industrial or agricultural practices and/or regulation. Regional EFs can be derived from top-down emissions measurements and used to make bespoke regional GHG emission inventories that account for geopolitical and social variability. However, most large-scale top-down approaches campaigns require significant investment. To address this, lower-cost driving surveys (DS) have been identified as a viable alternative to more established methods. DSs can take top-down measurements of many emission sources in a relatively short period of time, albeit with a higher uncertainty. To investigate the use of a portable measurement system, a 2260 km DS was conducted throughout the Denver-Julesburg Basin (DJB). The DJB covers an area of 8000 km2 north of Denver, CO and is densely populated with CH4 emission sources, including oil and gas (O and G) operations, agricultural operations (AGOs), lakes and reservoirs. During the DS, 157 individual CH4 emission sources were detected; 51%, 43% and 4% of sources were AGOs, O and G operations, and natural sources, respectively. Methane emissions from each source were quantified using downwind concentration and meteorological data and AGOs and O and G operations represented nearly all the CH4 emissions in the DJB, accounting for 54% and 37% of the total emission, respectively. Operations with similar emission sources were grouped together and average facility emission estimates were generated. For agricultural sources, emissions from feedlot cattle, dairy cows and sheep were estimated at 5, 31 and 1 g CH4 head-1 h-1, all of which agreed with published values taken from focused measurement campaigns. Similarly, for O and G average emissions for well pads, compressor stations and gas processing plants (0.5, 14 and 110 kg CH4 facility-1 h-1) were in reasonable agreement with emission estimates from intensive measurement campaigns. A comparison of our basin wide O and G emissions to measurements taken a decade ago show a decrease of a factor of three, which can feasibly be explained by changes to O and G regulation over the past 10 years, while emissions from AGOs have remained constant over the same time period. Our data suggest that DSs could be a low-cost alternative to traditional measurement campaigns and used to screen many emission sources within a region to derive representative regionally specific and time-sensitive EFs. The key benefit of the DS is that many regions can be screened and emission reduction targets identified where regional EFs are noticeably larger than the regional, national or global averages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart N. Riddick
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - Fancy Cheptonui
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - Kexin Yuan
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
- Cranfield Environment Centre, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK
| | - Mercy Mbua
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - Rachel Day
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - Timothy L. Vaughn
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - Aidan Duggan
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - Kristine E. Bennett
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| | - Daniel J. Zimmerle
- The Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80524, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dennis L, Richardson SJ, Miles N, Woda J, Brantley SL, Davis KJ. Measurements of Atmospheric Methane Emissions from Stray Gas Migration: A Case Study from the Marcellus Shale. ACS EARTH & SPACE CHEMISTRY 2022; 6:909-919. [PMID: 35495365 PMCID: PMC9037607 DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Understanding emissions of methane from legacy and ongoing shale gas development requires both regional studies that assess the frequency of emissions and case studies that assess causation. We present the first direct measurements of emissions in a case study of a putatively leaking gas well in the largest shale gas play in the United States. We quantify atmospheric methane emissions in farmland >2 km from the nearest shale gas well cited for casing and cementing issues. We find that emissions are highly heterogeneous as they travel long distances in the subsurface. Emissions were measured near observed patches of dead vegetation and methane bubbling from a stream. An eddy covariance flux tower, chamber flux measurements, and a survey of enhancements of the near-surface methane mole fraction were used to quantify emissions and evaluate the spatial and temporal variability. We combined eddy covariance measurements with the survey of the methane mole fraction to estimate total emissions over the study area (2,800 m2). Estimated at ∼6 kg CH4 day-1, emissions were spatially heterogeneous but showed no temporal trends over 6 months. The isotopic signature of the atmospheric CH4 source (δ13CH4) was equal to -29‰, consistent with methane of thermogenic origin and similar to the isotopic signature of the gas reported from the nearest shale gas well. While the magnitude of emissions from the potential leak is modest compared to large emitters identified among shale gas production sites, it is large compared to estimates of emissions from single abandoned wells. Since other areas of emissions have been identified close to this putatively leaking well, our estimate of emissions likely represents only a portion of total emissions from this event. More comprehensive quantification will require more extensive spatial and temporal sampling of the locations of gas migration to the surface as well as an investigation into the mechanisms of subsurface gas migration. This work highlights an example of atmospheric methane emissions from potential stray gas migration at a location far from a well pad, and further research should explore the frequency and mechanisms behind these types of events to inform careful and strategic natural gas development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren
E. Dennis
- Department
of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 503 Walker Building, University
Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
| | - Scott J. Richardson
- Department
of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 503 Walker Building, University
Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
| | - Natasha Miles
- Department
of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 503 Walker Building, University
Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
| | - Josh Woda
- Department
of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 503 Deike Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
| | - Susan L. Brantley
- Department
of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, 503 Deike Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
- Earth
and Environmental Systems Institute, The
Pennsylvania State University, 2217 Earth-Engineering Sciences Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
| | - Kenneth J. Davis
- Department
of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 503 Walker Building, University
Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
- Earth
and Environmental Systems Institute, The
Pennsylvania State University, 2217 Earth-Engineering Sciences Building, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Omara M, Zavala-Araiza D, Lyon DR, Hmiel B, Roberts KA, Hamburg SP. Methane emissions from US low production oil and natural gas well sites. Nat Commun 2022; 13:2085. [PMID: 35440563 PMCID: PMC9019036 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29709-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Eighty percent of US oil and natural gas (O&G) production sites are low production well sites, with average site-level production ≤15 barrels of oil equivalent per day and producing only 6% of the nation's O&G output in 2019. Here, we integrate national site-level O&G production data and previously reported site-level CH4 measurement data (n = 240) and find that low production well sites are a disproportionately large source of US O&G well site CH4 emissions, emitting more than 4 (95% confidence interval: 3-6) teragrams, 50% more than the total CH4 emissions from the Permian Basin, one of the world's largest O&G producing regions. We estimate low production well sites represent roughly half (37-75%) of all O&G well site CH4 emissions, and a production-normalized CH4 loss rate of more than 10%-a factor of 6-12 times higher than the mean CH4 loss rate of 1.5% for all O&G well sites in the US. Our work suggests that achieving significant reductions in O&G CH4 emissions will require mitigation of emissions from low production well sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Omara
- Environmental Defense Fund, Austin, TX, 78701, USA.
| | - Daniel Zavala-Araiza
- Environmental Defense Fund, Austin, TX, 78701, USA
- Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David R Lyon
- Environmental Defense Fund, Austin, TX, 78701, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gao J, Guan C, Zhang B. Why are methane emissions from China's oil & natural gas systems still unclear? A review of current bottom-up inventories. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 807:151076. [PMID: 34678371 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
There is growing awareness and concern on methane (CH4) emissions from China's oil and natural gas (ONG) systems owing to the carbon neutral target. This paper aims to present a comprehensive review on the bottom-up inventories of the CH4 emissions from the perspective of the ONG systems in China. The trend and magnitude of total emissions in the last four decades were revealed and limitations of current estimations were explored. Previous studies showed that the average CH4 emissions from China's ONG systems have almost tripled from 1980 (760 Gg) to 2015 (2180 Gg) with a trend of steady increase. However, the estimated values varied by an order-of-magnitude with the largest discrepancy of 2700 Gg. This discrepancy was unlikely caused mainly by the incompleteness of estimation, since dominant emission sources were all covered by representative studies. Moreover, the differences of activity-level data were within ±10%, which ruled out the possibility that it was the main contributor to the large discrepancies. The emissions estimate has huge variation in large part because of differences in assumed emission factors (EFs) that vary by an order of magnitude. The difficulty was to determine which of the EFs were accurate due to measurement-based data availability. Thus, the large discrepancies stem from the scarcity of publicly available data, which enlarged the impact from various methods adopted by previous studies. For better understanding of CH4 emissions from the ONG systems in China, the measurements of facility-level emissions and statistics on the ONG infrastructure are required urgently. Due to the high cost and experience-oriented measurement work, international cooperation and communications are critical prerequisites for future CH4 emission estimates and effective mitigation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junlian Gao
- School of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, PR China
| | - ChengHe Guan
- New York University Shanghai, Shanghai 200122, PR China; Harvard China Project, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, MA 02138, United States
| | - Bo Zhang
- School of Management, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, PR China; Harvard China Project, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, MA 02138, United States; State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Johnson D, Heltzel R. On the Long-Term Temporal Variations in Methane Emissions from an Unconventional Natural Gas Well Site. ACS OMEGA 2021; 6:14200-14207. [PMID: 34124443 PMCID: PMC8190792 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Understanding methane emissions from the natural gas supply chain continues to be of interest. Previous studies identified that measurements are skewed due to "super-emitters", and recently, researchers identified temporal variability as another contributor to discrepancies among studies. We focused on the latter by performing 17 methane audits at a single production site over 4 years, from 2016 to 2020. Source detection was similar to Method 21 but augmented with accurate methane mass rate quantification. Audit results varied from ∼78 g/h to over 43 kg/h with a mean emissions rate of 4.2 kg/h and a geometric mean of 821 g/h. Such high variability sheds light that even quarterly measurement programs will likely yield highly variable results. Total emissions were typically dominated by those from the produced water storage tank. Of 213 sources quantified, a single tank measurement represented 60% of the cumulative emission rate. Measurements were separated into four categories: wellheads (n = 78), tank (n = 17), enclosed gas process units (n = 31), and others (n = 97). Each subgroup of measurements was skewed and fat-tailed, with the skewness ranging from 2.4 to 5.7 and kurtosis values ranging from 6.5 to 33.7. Analyses found no significant correlations between methane emissions and temperature, whole gas production, or water production. Since measurement results were highly variable and daily production values were known, we completed a Monte Carlo analysis to estimate average throughput-normalized methane emissions which yielded an estimate of 0.093 ± 0.013%.
Collapse
|
11
|
Vaughn TL, Luck B, Williams L, Marchese AJ, Zimmerle D. Methane Exhaust Measurements at Gathering Compressor Stations in the United States. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2021; 55:1190-1196. [PMID: 33410668 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c05492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Unburned methane entrained in exhaust from natural gas-fired compressor engines ("combustion slip") can account for a substantial portion of station-level methane emissions. A novel in-stack, tracer gas method was coupled with Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) species measurements to quantify combustion slip from natural gas compressor engines at 67 gathering and boosting stations owned or managed by nine "study partner" operators in 11 U.S. states. The mean methane emission rate from 63 four-stroke, lean-burn (4SLB) compressor engines was 5.62 kg/h (95% CI = 5.15-6.17 kg/h) and ranged from 0.3 to 12.6 kg/h. The mean methane emission rate from 39 four-stroke, rich-burn (4SRB) compressor engines was 0.40 kg/h (95% CI = 0.37-0.42 kg/h) and ranged from 0.01 to 4.5 kg/h. Study results for 4SLB engines were lower than both the U.S. EPA compilation of air pollutant emission factors (AP-42) and Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks (GHGI) by 8 and 9%, respectively. Study results for 4SRB engines were 43% of the AP-42 emission factor and 8% of the GHGI emission factor, the latter of which does not distinguish between engine types. Total annual combustion slip from the U.S. natural gas gathering and boosting sector was modeled using measured emission rates and compressor unit counts from the U.S. EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. Modeled results [328 Gg/y (95% CI = 235-436 Gg/y) of unburned methane] would account for 24% (95% CI = 17-31%) of the 1391 Gg of methane emissions for "Gathering and Boosting Stations", or 6% of the net emissions for "Natural Gas Systems" (5598 Gg) as reported in the 2020 U.S. EPA GHGI. Gathering and boosting combustion slip emissions reported in the 2020 GHGI (374 Gg) fall within the uncertainty of this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy L Vaughn
- Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | - Benjamin Luck
- Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| | | | - Anthony J Marchese
- Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
- Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States
| | - Daniel Zimmerle
- Energy Institute, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
A chemiresistive sensor is described for the detection of methane (CH4), a potent greenhouse gas that also poses an explosion hazard in air. The chemiresistor allows for the low-power, low-cost, and distributed sensing of CH4 at room temperature in air with environmental implications for gas leak detection in homes, production facilities, and pipelines. Specifically, the chemiresistors are based on single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) noncovalently functionalized with poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) that enables the incorporation of a platinum-polyoxometalate (Pt-POM) CH4 oxidation precatalyst into the sensor by P4VP coordination. The resulting SWCNT-P4VP-Pt-POM composite showed ppm-level sensitivity to CH4 and good stability to air as well as time, wherein the generation of a high-valent platinum intermediate during CH4 oxidation is proposed as the origin of the observed chemiresistive response. The chemiresistor was found to exhibit selectivity for CH4 over heavier hydrocarbons such as n-hexane, benzene, toluene, and o-xylene, as well as gases, including carbon dioxide and hydrogen. The utility of the sensor in detecting CH4 using a simple handheld multimeter was also demonstrated.
Collapse
|
13
|
Robertson AM, Edie R, Field RA, Lyon D, McVay R, Omara M, Zavala-Araiza D, Murphy SM. New Mexico Permian Basin Measured Well Pad Methane Emissions Are a Factor of 5-9 Times Higher Than U.S. EPA Estimates. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2020; 54:13926-13934. [PMID: 33058723 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Methane emission fluxes were estimated for 71 oil and gas well pads in the western Permian Basin (Delaware Basin), using a mobile laboratory and an inverse Gaussian dispersion method (OTM 33A). Sites with emissions that were below detection limit (BDL) for OTM 33A were recorded and included in the sample. Average emission rate per site was estimated by bootstrapping and by maximum likelihood best log-normal fit. Sites had to be split into "complex" (sites with liquid storage tanks and/or compressors) and "simple" (sites with only wellheads/pump jacks/separators) categories to achieve acceptable log-normal fits. For complex sites, the log-normal fit depends heavily on the number of BDL sites included. As more BDL sites are included, the log-normal distribution fit to the data is falsely widened, overestimating the mean, highlighting the importance of correctly characterizing low end emissions when using log-normal fits. Basin-wide methane emission rates were estimated for the production sector of the New Mexico portion of the Permian and range from ∼520 000 tons per year, TPY (bootstrapping, 95% CI: 300 000-790 000) to ∼610 000 TPY (log-normal fit method, 95% CI: 330 000-1 000 000). These estimates are a factor of 5.5-9.0 times greater than EPA National Emission Inventory (NEI) estimates for the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna M Robertson
- Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, 1000 E University Ave, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, United States
| | - Rachel Edie
- Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, 1000 E University Ave, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, United States
| | - Robert A Field
- Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, 1000 E University Ave, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, United States
| | - David Lyon
- Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Renee McVay
- Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Mark Omara
- Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Daniel Zavala-Araiza
- Environmental Defense Fund, 301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1300, Austin, Texas 78701, United States
| | - Shane M Murphy
- Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, 1000 E University Ave, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Edie R, Robertson AM, Soltis J, Field RA, Snare D, Burkhart MD, Murphy SM. Off-Site Flux Estimates of Volatile Organic Compounds from Oil and Gas Production Facilities Using Fast-Response Instrumentation. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2020; 54:1385-1394. [PMID: 31715097 DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Flux estimates of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from oil and gas (O&G) production facilities are fundamental in understanding hazardous air pollutant concentrations and ozone formation. Previous off-site emission estimates derive fluxes by ratioing VOCs measured in canisters to methane fluxes measured in the field. This study uses the Environmental Protection Agency's Other Test Method 33A (OTM 33A) and a fast-response proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer to make direct measurements of VOC emissions from O&G facilities in the Upper Green River Basin, Wyoming. We report the first off-site direct flux estimates of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes from upstream O&G production facilities and find that these estimates can vary significantly from flux estimates derived using both the canister ratio technique and from the emission inventory. The 32 OTM 33A flux estimates had arithmetic mean (and 95% CI) as follows: benzene 17.83 (0.22, 98.05) g/h, toluene 34.43 (1.01, 126.76) g/h, C8 aromatics 37.38 (1.06, 225.34) g/h, and methane 2.3 (1.7, 3.1) kg/h. A total of 20% of facilities measured accounted for ∼67% of total BTEX emissions. While this heavy tail is less dramatic than previous observations of methane in other basins, it is more prominent than that predicted by the emission inventory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Edie
- Department of Atmospheric Science , University of Wyoming , 1000 East University Avenue , Laramie , Wyoming 82071 , United States
| | - Anna M Robertson
- Department of Atmospheric Science , University of Wyoming , 1000 East University Avenue , Laramie , Wyoming 82071 , United States
| | - Jeffrey Soltis
- Department of Atmospheric Science , University of Wyoming , 1000 East University Avenue , Laramie , Wyoming 82071 , United States
| | - Robert A Field
- Department of Atmospheric Science , University of Wyoming , 1000 East University Avenue , Laramie , Wyoming 82071 , United States
| | - Dustin Snare
- All4, Inc. , Kimberton , Pennsylvania 19442 , United States
| | - Matthew D Burkhart
- Department of Atmospheric Science , University of Wyoming , 1000 East University Avenue , Laramie , Wyoming 82071 , United States
| | - Shane M Murphy
- Department of Atmospheric Science , University of Wyoming , 1000 East University Avenue , Laramie , Wyoming 82071 , United States
| |
Collapse
|