Linking Isotope Exchange with Fe(II)-Catalyzed Dissolution of Iron(hydr)oxides in the Presence of the Bacterial Siderophore Desferrioxamine-B

Biogeochemical cycles of iron: Processes, mechanisms, and environmental implications

The iron (Fe) biogeochemical cycle is critical for abiotic and biological environmental processes that overlap spatially and may compete with each other. The development of modern molecular biology technologies promoted the understanding of the electron transport mechanisms of Fe-cycling-related microorganisms. Recent studies have revealed a novel pathway for microaerophilic ferrous iron (Fe(II))-oxidizers in extracellular Fe(II) oxidation. In addition, OmcS, OmcZ, and OmcE nanowires on the cell surface have been shown to promote electron transfer between microorganisms and their environment. These processes affect the fate of pollutants in directly or indirectly ways, such as greenhouse gas emissions. In this review, these advances and the environmental implications of the Fe cycle process were discussed, with a particular focus on the mechanisms of intracellular or extracellular electron transport in microorganisms.

Arsenic redistribution associated with Fe(II)-induced jarosite transformation in the presence of polygalacturonic acid

Jarosite exists widely in acid-sulfate soil and acid mine drainage polluted areas and acts as an important host mineral for As(V). As a metastable Fe(III)-oxyhydoxysulfate mineral, its dissolution and transformation have a significant impact on the biogeochemical cycle of As. Under reducing conditions, the trajectory and degree of abiotic Fe(II)-induced jarosite transformation may be greatly influenced by coexisting dissolved organic matter (DOM), and in turn influencing the fate of As. Here, we explored the impact of polygalacturonic acid (PGA) (0-200 mg·L-1) on As(V)-coprecipitated jarosite transformation in the presence of Fe(II) (1 mM) at pH 5.5, and investigated the repartitioning of As between aqueous and solid phase. The results demonstrated that in the system without both PGA and Fe(II), jarosite gradually dissolved, and lepidocrocite was the main transformation product by 30 d; in Fe(II)-only system, lepidocrocite appeared by 1 d and also was the mainly final product; in PGA-only systems, PGA retarded jarosite dissolution and transformation, jarosite might be directly converted into goethite; in Fe(II)-PGA systems, the presence of PGA retarded Fe(II)-induced jarosite dissolution and transformation but did not alter the pathway of mineral transformation, the final product mainly still was lepidocrocite. The retarding effect on jarosite dissolution enhanced with the increase of PGA content. The impact of PGA on Fe(II)-induced jarosite transformation mainly was related to the complexation of carboxyl groups of PGA with Fe(II). The dissolution and transformation of jarosite drove pre-incorporated As transferred into the phosphate-extractable phase, the presence of PGA retarded jarosite dissolution and maintained pre-incorporated As stable in jarosite. The released As promoted by PGA was retarded again and almost no As was released into the solution by the end of reactions in all systems. In systems with Fe(II), no As(III) was detected and As(V) was still the dominant redox species.

Divergent redistribution behavior of divalent metal cations associated with Fe(II)-mediated jarosite phase transformation

The Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycle is an important driving force for dissolution and transformation of jarosite. Divalent heavy metals usually coexist with jarosite; however, their effects on Fe(II)-induced jarosite transformation and different repartitioning behavior during mineral dissolution-recrystallization are still unclear. Here, we investigated Fe(II)-induced (1 mM Fe(II)) jarosite conversion in the presence of Cd(II), Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Pb(II) (denoted as Me(II), 1 mM), respectively, under anaerobic condition at neutral pH. The results showed that all co-existing Me(II) retarded Fe(II)-induced jarosite dissolution. In the Fe(II)-only system, jarosite first rapidly transformed to lepidocrocite (an intermediate product) and then slowly to goethite; lepidocrocite was the main product. In Fe(II)-Cd(II), -Mn(II), and -Pb(II) systems, coexisting Cd(II), Mn(II) and Pb(II) retarded the above process and lepidocrocite was still the dominant conversion product. In Fe(II)-Co(II) system, coexisting Co(II) promoted lepidocrocite transformation into goethite. In Fe(II)-Ni(II) system, jarosite appeared to be directly converted into goethite, although small amounts of lepidocrocite were detected in the final product. In all treatments, the appearance or accumulation of lepidocrocite may be also related to the re-adsorption of released sulfate. By the end of reaction, 6.0 %, 4.0 %, 76.0 % 11.3 % and 19.2 % of total Cd(II), Mn(II), Pb(II) Co(II) and Ni(II) were adsorbed on the surface of solid products. Up to 49.6 %, 44.3 %, and 21.6 % of Co(II), Ni(II), and Pb(II) incorporated into solid product, with the reaction indicating that the dynamic process of Fe(II) interaction with goethite may promote the continuous incorporation of Co(II), Ni(II), and Pb(II).

Contaminant containment for sustainable remediation of persistent contaminants in soil and groundwater

Contaminant containment measures are often necessary to prevent or minimize offsite movement of contaminated materials for disposal or other purposes when they can be buried or left in place due to extensive subsurface contamination. These measures can include physical, chemical, and biological technologies such as impermeable and permeable barriers, stabilization and solidification, and phytostabilization. Contaminant containment is advantageous because it can stop contaminant plumes from migrating further and allow for pollutant reduction at sites where the source is inaccessible or cannot be removed. Moreover, unlike other options, contaminant containment measures do not require the excavation of contaminated substrates. However, contaminant containment measures require regular inspections to monitor for contaminant mobilization and migration. This review critically evaluates the sources of persistent contaminants, the different approaches to contaminant remediation, and the various physical-chemical-biological processes of contaminant containment. Additionally, the review provides case studies of contaminant containment operations under real or simulated field conditions. In summary, contaminant containment measures are essential for preventing further contamination and reducing risks to public health and the environment. While periodic monitoring is necessary, the benefits of contaminant containment make it a valuable remediation option when other methods are not feasible.

Autotrophic Fe-Driven Biological Nitrogen Removal Technologies for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment

Fe-driven biological nitrogen removal (FeBNR) has become one of the main technologies in water pollution remediation due to its economy, safety and mild reaction conditions. This paper systematically summarizes abiotic and biotic reactions in the Fe and N cycles, including nitrate/nitrite-dependent anaerobic Fe(II) oxidation (NDAFO) and anaerobic ammonium oxidation coupled with Fe(III) reduction (Feammox). The biodiversity of iron-oxidizing microorganisms for nitrate/nitrite reduction and iron-reducing microorganisms for ammonium oxidation are reviewed. The effects of environmental factors, e.g., pH, redox potential, Fe species, extracellular electron shuttles and natural organic matter, on the FeBNR reaction rate are analyzed. Current application advances in natural and artificial wastewater treatment are introduced with some typical experimental and application cases. Autotrophic FeBNR can treat low-C/N wastewater and greatly benefit the sustainable development of environmentally friendly biotechnologies for advanced nitrogen control.

Catalytic effects of photogenerated Fe(II) on the ligand-controlled dissolution of Iron(hydr)oxides by EDTA and DFOB

Low bioavailability of iron due to poor solubility of iron(hydr)oxides limits the growth of microorganisms and plants in soils and aquatic environments. Previous studies described accelerated dissolution of iron(hydr)oxides under continuous illumination, but did not distinguish between photoreductive dissolution and non-reductive processes in which photogenerated Fe(II) catalyzes ligand-controlled dissolution. Here we show that short illuminations (5-15 min) accelerate the dissolution of iron(hydr)oxides by ligands during subsequent dark periods under anoxic conditions. Suspensions of lepidocrocite (Lp) and goethite (Gt) (1.13 mM) with 50 μM EDTA or DFOB were illuminated with UV-A light of comparable intensity to sunlight (pH 7.0, bicarbonate-CO₂ buffered solutions). During illumination, the rate of Fe(II) production was highest with Gt-EDTA; followed by Lp-EDTA > Lp-DFOB > Lp > Gt-DFOB > Gt. Under anoxic conditions, photochemically produced Fe(II) increased dissolution rates during subsequent dark periods by factors of 10-40 and dissolved Fe(III) reached 50 μM with DFOB and EDTA. Under oxic conditions, dissolution rates increased by factors of 3-5 only during illumination. With DFOB dissolved Fe(III) reached 35 μM after 10 h of illumination, while with EDTA it peaked at 15 μM and then decreased to below 2 μM. The observations are explained and discussed based on a kinetic model. The results suggest that in anoxic bottom water of ponds and lakes, or in microenvironments of algal blooms, short illuminations can dramatically increase the bioavailability of iron by Fe(II)-catalyzed ligand-controlled dissolution. In oxic environments, photostable ligands such as DFOB can maintain Fe(III) in solution during extended illumination.