Homoleptic Uranium-Bis(acyl)phosphide Complexes

Alkyl Coordination in meso-(ONO)2- Supported Uranium(IV) Complexes

A series of U(IV) complexes bearing alkyl and chloride ligands in the trans configuration was synthesized and characterized. Starting with the diastereopure U(IV) trans-dichloride complex meso-( tBu2PONO)UCl2(dtbpy) (1, tBu2PONO = 2,6-bis((di-tert-butylphosphino)methanolato)pyridine), four distinct alkyl groups were employed to prepare ( tBu2PONO)U(R)Cl(dtbpy), where R = (trimethylsilyl)methyl (neosilyl), 2a, R = 2,2-dimethyl propyl (neopentyl), 2b, and R = 2-methyl-2-phenyl propyl (neophyl), 2c. Alkylation occurs with specificity but generates a predominant species and a minor species corresponding to anti/syn regioisomers relative to the tBu2P groups of the ligand. For synthesis using R = methyl, the dimethyl complex ( tBu2PONO)U(Me)2(dtbpy), 2d, was prepared; the addition of 1 equiv of MeLi produced a mixture of products. Complexes 2a-2d were characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction (SC-XRD), UV-vis-nIR, and 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopies.

Bis(acyl)phosphide Complexes of U(III)/U(IV): A Case of a Hidden Redox-Active Ligand

The recently reported tris(bis(2,4,6-triisopropylbenzoyl)-phosphide)uranium (UIII(trippBAP)3, 2) complex (Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61 (32), 12508-12517) demonstrated a silent 31P NMR spectrum. This complex was described as a U(III) complex with an organic radical ligand fragment. Moreover, the EPR spectrum of 2 was indicative of an organic radical in the ligand framework complexed to uranium, in contrast to that of UIV(mesBAP)4, 1. Herein, with the help of relativistic density functional theory (DFT) calculations, the electronic structures of 1, 2, and U(mesBAP)3 (4) are examined in an effort to understand the unusual 31P NMR spectrum of 2. Results indicate the reduction of the carbonyl bonds and delocalization of the electrons over the ligands, indicative of U → L backbonding. Additionally, the reduced acyl carbons are found to exist as ketyl radicals [O═C• -] that are responsible for the silent 31P NMR spectra of 2. These findings demonstrate the redox noninnocent nature of BAP- in 2 and 4, causing uranium to exist in a formal oxidation state of +4.

Determining the Effects of Zero-Field Splitting and Magnetic Exchange in Dimeric Europium(II) Complexes

Related BAP [BAP = bis(acyl)phosphide] and Acac (Acac = β-diketonate) molecules perform as robust supports for both lanthanide and actinide metals. Here, a molecular bimetallic Eu2+ complex was successfully targeted and isolated by employing sodium bis(mesitoyl)phosphide [Na(mesBAP)] in a salt metathesis with EuI2, producing [Eu(mesBAP)2(et2o)]2 (et2o = metal-coordinated diethyl ether). The corresponding Acac-Eu2+ complex was targeted using mesAcac- (1,3-dimesityl-1,3-propanedione), generating [Eu(mesAcac)2(et2o)]2. Both complexes were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, UV-vis, IR, and NMR spectroscopies, and variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility. [Eu(mesBAP)2(et2o)]2 was persistent under anaerobic, anhydrous conditions, whereas the analogous [Eu(mesAcac)2(et2o)]2 showed evidence of decomposition under identical conditions. Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility and magnetization studies of [Eu(mesBAP)2(et2o)]2 and [Eu(mesAcac)2(et2o)]2 were performed, resulting in similar magnetic exchange coupling values of Jex = -0.018 and -0.023 cm-1 and axial zero-field-splitting D values of -0.38 and -0.51 cm-1, respectively.

Perplexing EPR Signals from 5f36d1 U(II) Complexes

Metal complexes with unpaired electrons in orbitals of different angular momentum quantum numbers (e.g., f and d orbitals) are unusual and opportunities to study the interactions among these electrons are rare. X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) data were collected at <10 and 77 K on 10 U(II) complexes with 5f36d1 electron configurations and on some analogous Ce(II), Pr(II), and Nd(II) complexes with 4fn5d1 electron configurations. The U(II) compounds unexpectedly display similar two-line axial signals with g|| = 2.04 and g⊥ = 2.00 at 77 K. In contrast, U(II) complexes with 5f4 configurations are EPR-silent. Unlike U(II), the congenic 4f35d1 Nd(II) complex is EPR-silent. The Ce(II) complex with a 4f15d1 configuration is also EPR-silent, but a signal is observed for the Pr(II) complex, which has a 4f25d1 configuration. Whether or not an EPR signal is expected for these complexes depends on the coupling between f and d electrons. Since the coupling in U(II) systems is expected to be sufficiently strong to preclude an EPR signal from compounds with a 5f36d1 configuration, the results are viewed as unexplained phenomena. However, they do show that 5f36d1 U(II) samples can be differentiated from 5f4 U(II) complexes by EPR spectroscopy.

Bis(acyl)phosphide - Ambidentate Ligands for the Synthesis of Group 14 and 15 Main Group Element Compounds

The reactivity of the bis(acyl)phosphide ion [P(COR)₂ ]^- (BAP^- , R=Ph, Mes) with silicon halides SiX₄ (X=Cl, Br) and pnictogen chlorides ECl₃ (E=As, Sb and Bi) was investigated. The reaction with SiX₄ leads to the hexacoordinate silanes SiX₂ (BAP)₂ in which BAP^- is coordinated in the chelating κ² -O,O' mode, analogously to acac^- . Unexpectedly, the coordination behaviour of BAP^- differs from the one of acac^- in the interpnictogen compounds E(BAP)₃ (E=As, Sb) in which the formation of E-P bonds is favoured over κ² -O,O' chelation via the oxygen centres. Finally, the reaction of BiCl₃ with three equivalents of Na(BAP) leads to the formation of red, crystalline Bi₂ (BAP)₄ , an air stable dibismuthine, as product of a redox reaction.