1
|
Coe JP, Moreno Carrascosa A, Simmermacher M, Kirrander A, Paterson MJ. Efficient Computation of Two-Electron Reduced Density Matrices via Selected Configuration Interaction. J Chem Theory Comput 2022; 18:6690-6699. [PMID: 36198067 PMCID: PMC9648180 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
![]()
We create an approach to efficiently calculate two-electron
reduced
density matrices (2-RDMs) using selected configuration interaction
wavefunctions. This is demonstrated using the specific example of
Monte Carlo configuration interaction (MCCI). The computation of the
2-RDMs is accelerated by using ideas from fast implementations of
full configuration interaction (FCI) and recent advances in implementing
the Slater–Condon rules using hardware bitwise operations.
This method enables a comparison of MCCI and truncated CI 2-RDMs with
FCI values for a range of molecules, which includes stretched bonds
and excited states. The accuracy in energies, wavefunctions, and 2-RDMs
is seen to exhibit a similar behavior. We find that MCCI can reach
sufficient accuracy of the 2-RDM using significantly fewer configurations
than truncated CI, particularly for systems with strong multireference
character.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy P Coe
- Institute of Chemical Sciences, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, EdinburghEH14 4AS, U.K
| | | | - Mats Simmermacher
- EaStCHEM, School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, EdinburghEH9 3FJ, U.K
| | - Adam Kirrander
- EaStCHEM, School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, EdinburghEH9 3FJ, U.K
| | - Martin J Paterson
- Institute of Chemical Sciences, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, EdinburghEH14 4AS, U.K
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lew-Yee JFH, M. del Campo J. Charge delocalization error in Piris Natural Orbital Functionals. J Chem Phys 2022; 157:104113. [DOI: 10.1063/5.0102310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Piris Natural Orbital Functionals (PNOF) have been recognized as a low-scaling alternative to study strong correlated systems. In this work, we address the performance of the fifth functional (PNOF5) and the seventh functional (PNOF7) to deal with another common problem, the charge delocalization error. The effects of this problem can be observed in charged systems of repeated well-separated fragments, where the energy should be the sum of the charged and neutral fragments, regardless of how the charge is distributed. In practice, an energetic overstabilization of fractional charged fragments leads to a preference for having the charge delocalized throughout the system. To establish the performance of PNOF functionals regarding charge delocalization error, charged chains of helium atoms and the W4-17-MR set molecules were used as base fragments and their energy, charge distribution and correlation regime were studied. It was found that PNOF5 prefers localized charge distributions, while PNOF7 improves the treatment of interpair static correlation and tends to the correct energetic limit for several cases, although a preference for delocalized charge distributions may arise in highly strong correlation regimes. Overall, it is concluded that PNOF functionals can simultaneously deal with static correlation and charge delocalization errors, resulting in a promising choice to study charge-related problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Felipe Huan Lew-Yee
- Departamento de Física y Química Teórica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Facultad de Química, Mexico
| | - Jorge M. del Campo
- Departamento de Física y Química Teórica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Head-Marsden K, Flick J, Ciccarino CJ, Narang P. Quantum Information and Algorithms for Correlated Quantum Matter. Chem Rev 2020; 121:3061-3120. [PMID: 33326218 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Discoveries in quantum materials, which are characterized by the strongly quantum-mechanical nature of electrons and atoms, have revealed exotic properties that arise from correlations. It is the promise of quantum materials for quantum information science superimposed with the potential of new computational quantum algorithms to discover new quantum materials that inspires this Review. We anticipate that quantum materials to be discovered and developed in the next years will transform the areas of quantum information processing including communication, storage, and computing. Simultaneously, efforts toward developing new quantum algorithmic approaches for quantum simulation and advanced calculation methods for many-body quantum systems enable major advances toward functional quantum materials and their deployment. The advent of quantum computing brings new possibilities for eliminating the exponential complexity that has stymied simulation of correlated quantum systems on high-performance classical computers. Here, we review new algorithms and computational approaches to predict and understand the behavior of correlated quantum matter. The strongly interdisciplinary nature of the topics covered necessitates a common language to integrate ideas from these fields. We aim to provide this common language while weaving together fields across electronic structure theory, quantum electrodynamics, algorithm design, and open quantum systems. Our Review is timely in presenting the state-of-the-art in the field toward algorithms with nonexponential complexity for correlated quantum matter with applications in grand-challenge problems. Looking to the future, at the intersection of quantum information science and algorithms for correlated quantum matter, we envision seminal advances in predicting many-body quantum states and describing excitonic quantum matter and large-scale entangled states, a better understanding of high-temperature superconductivity, and quantifying open quantum system dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kade Head-Marsden
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
| | - Johannes Flick
- Center for Computational Quantum Physics, Flatiron Institute, New York, New York 10010, United States
| | - Christopher J Ciccarino
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States.,Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
| | - Prineha Narang
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Conti I, Cerullo G, Nenov A, Garavelli M. Ultrafast Spectroscopy of Photoactive Molecular Systems from First Principles: Where We Stand Today and Where We Are Going. J Am Chem Soc 2020; 142:16117-16139. [PMID: 32841559 PMCID: PMC7901644 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c04952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
![]()
Computational spectroscopy is becoming a mandatory tool for the interpretation of the
complex, and often congested, spectral maps delivered by modern non-linear multi-pulse
techniques. The fields of Electronic Structure Methods,
Non-Adiabatic Molecular Dynamics, and Theoretical
Spectroscopy represent the three pillars of the virtual ultrafast
optical spectrometer, able to deliver transient spectra in
silico from first principles. A successful simulation strategy requires a
synergistic approach that balances between the three fields, each one having its very
own challenges and bottlenecks. The aim of this Perspective is to demonstrate that,
despite these challenges, an impressive agreement between theory and experiment is
achievable now regarding the modeling of ultrafast photoinduced processes in complex
molecular architectures. Beyond that, some key recent developments in the three fields
are presented that we believe will have major impacts on spectroscopic simulations in
the very near future. Potential directions of development, pending challenges, and
rising opportunities are illustrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Conti
- Dipartimento di Chimica Industriale, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 4, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulio Cerullo
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, IFN-CNR, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Artur Nenov
- Dipartimento di Chimica Industriale, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 4, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Garavelli
- Dipartimento di Chimica Industriale, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Viale del Risorgimento 4, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maradzike E, Hapka M, Pernal K, DePrince AE. Reduced Density Matrix-Driven Complete Active Apace Self-Consistent Field Corrected for Dynamic Correlation from the Adiabatic Connection. J Chem Theory Comput 2020; 16:4351-4360. [PMID: 32538086 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The recently proposed multireference adiabatic connection (AC) formalism [Pernal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 013001 (2018)] is applied to recover dynamic electron correlation effects lacking in variational two-electron reduced density matrix (v2RDM)-driven complete active space self-consistent field theory (CASSCF). The AC approach is validated by computing potential energy curves for the dissociation of molecular nitrogen and the symmetric double dissociation of H2O while enforcing two sets of approximate N-representability conditions in the underlying v2RDM-driven CASSCF calculations (either two-particle or two-particle plus partial three-particle conditions). The AC yields smaller absolute errors than second-order N-electron perturbation theory (NEVPT2) at all molecular geometries for both sets of the N-representability conditions considered. The efficacy of the approach for thermochemistry is also assessed for a set of 31 small-molecule reactions. When imposing partial three-particle N-representability conditions, mean and maximum unsigned errors in reaction energies from the AC are superior to those from NEVPT2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elvis Maradzike
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4390, United States
| | - Michał Hapka
- Institute of Physics, Lodz University of Technology, ul. Wolczanska 219, 90-924 Lodz, Poland.,Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, ul. L. Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Pernal
- Institute of Physics, Lodz University of Technology, ul. Wolczanska 219, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
| | - A Eugene DePrince
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4390, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith DGA, Burns LA, Simmonett AC, Parrish RM, Schieber MC, Galvelis R, Kraus P, Kruse H, Di Remigio R, Alenaizan A, James AM, Lehtola S, Misiewicz JP, Scheurer M, Shaw RA, Schriber JB, Xie Y, Glick ZL, Sirianni DA, O’Brien JS, Waldrop JM, Kumar A, Hohenstein EG, Pritchard BP, Brooks BR, Schaefer HF, Sokolov AY, Patkowski K, DePrince AE, Bozkaya U, King RA, Evangelista FA, Turney JM, Crawford TD, Sherrill CD. Psi4 1.4: Open-source software for high-throughput quantum chemistry. J Chem Phys 2020; 152:184108. [PMID: 32414239 PMCID: PMC7228781 DOI: 10.1063/5.0006002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 337] [Impact Index Per Article: 84.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PSI4 is a free and open-source ab initio electronic structure program providing implementations of Hartree-Fock, density functional theory, many-body perturbation theory, configuration interaction, density cumulant theory, symmetry-adapted perturbation theory, and coupled-cluster theory. Most of the methods are quite efficient, thanks to density fitting and multi-core parallelism. The program is a hybrid of C++ and Python, and calculations may be run with very simple text files or using the Python API, facilitating post-processing and complex workflows; method developers also have access to most of PSI4's core functionalities via Python. Job specification may be passed using The Molecular Sciences Software Institute (MolSSI) QCSCHEMA data format, facilitating interoperability. A rewrite of our top-level computation driver, and concomitant adoption of the MolSSI QCARCHIVE INFRASTRUCTURE project, makes the latest version of PSI4 well suited to distributed computation of large numbers of independent tasks. The project has fostered the development of independent software components that may be reused in other quantum chemistry programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lori A. Burns
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | - Andrew C. Simmonett
- National Institutes of Health – National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute, Laboratory of Computational Biology, Bethesda,
Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Robert M. Parrish
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | - Matthew C. Schieber
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | | | - Peter Kraus
- School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin
University, Kent St., Bentley, Perth, Western Australia 6102,
Australia
| | - Holger Kruse
- Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of
Sciences, Královopolská 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech
Republic
| | - Roberto Di Remigio
- Department of Chemistry, Centre for Theoretical
and Computational Chemistry, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037
Tromsø, Norway
| | - Asem Alenaizan
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | - Andrew M. James
- Department of Chemistry, Virginia
Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - Susi Lehtola
- Department of Chemistry, University of
Helsinki, P.O. Box 55 (A. I. Virtasen aukio 1), FI-00014 Helsinki,
Finland
| | - Jonathon P. Misiewicz
- Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry,
University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Maximilian Scheurer
- Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific
Computing, Heidelberg University, D-69120 Heidelberg,
Germany
| | - Robert A. Shaw
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Exciton Science,
School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000,
Australia
| | - Jeffrey B. Schriber
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | - Yi Xie
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | - Zachary L. Glick
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | - Dominic A. Sirianni
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | - Joseph Senan O’Brien
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| | - Jonathan M. Waldrop
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn
University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA
| | - Ashutosh Kumar
- Department of Chemistry, Virginia
Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - Edward G. Hohenstein
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford
PULSE Institute, Menlo Park, California 94025,
USA
| | | | - Bernard R. Brooks
- National Institutes of Health – National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute, Laboratory of Computational Biology, Bethesda,
Maryland 20892, USA
| | - Henry F. Schaefer
- Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry,
University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | - Alexander Yu. Sokolov
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
| | - Konrad Patkowski
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Auburn
University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA
| | - A. Eugene DePrince
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4390,
USA
| | - Uğur Bozkaya
- Department of Chemistry, Hacettepe
University, Ankara 06800, Turkey
| | - Rollin A. King
- Department of Chemistry, Bethel
University, St. Paul, Minnesota 55112, USA
| | | | - Justin M. Turney
- Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry,
University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA
| | | | - C. David Sherrill
- Center for Computational Molecular Science and
Technology, School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Computational Science and
Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0400,
USA
| |
Collapse
|