Adsorption of Proteins at the Solution/Air Interface Influenced by Added Nonionic Surfactants at Very Low Concentrations for Both Components. 3. Dilational Surface Rheology

Interaction Mechanism of Different Surfactants with Casein: A Perspective on Bulk and Interfacial Phase Behavior

Understanding the interaction mechanism between proteins and surfactants is conducive to the application of protein/surfactant mixtures in the food industry. The present study investigated the interaction mechanism of casein with cationic Gemini surfactant (BQAS), anionic Gemini surfactant (SGS), anionic single-chain surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]), and two biosurfactants (rhamnolipid [RL] and lactone sophorolipid [SL]) at the interface and in bulk phase. BQAS/casein and SDS/casein mixtures exhibit a strong synergistic effect on the surface activity. For SGS, RL, and SL, the formation of surfactant/casein complexes caused no improvement in surface activity. Dilational elasticity results indicate the displacement of casein by SGS, RL, and SL at the surface. However, the BQAS/casein complexes manifested varying dilational properties from pure casein surface. The strong electrostatic interaction between BQAS and casein produced large-size precipitate particles. For other surfactants, no precipitate particles formed. Determination of ζ-potential, UV-vis absorption spectra, and fluorescence spectra demonstrated the stronger interaction of BQAS and SDS with casein than that of SGS, RL, and SL. Addition of BQAS initially increased and then decreased the α-helix structure of casein. For SGS, RL, and SL, no noticeable change occurred in the casein structure. However, the formation of SDS/casein complexes was conducive to the casein structure. In conclusion, the interaction between BQAS and casein is similar to that of cationic single-chain surfactant. Furthermore, SGS exhibits a significantly different interaction mechanism from the corresponding monomer (SDS), possibly resulting from its excellent interfacial activity, low critical micelle concentration values, and strong self-assembly capability. For RL and SL, the weak interaction is attributed to the relatively complicated structure and less charged degree of hydrophilic headgroups.

Formation of protein/surfactant adsorption layer as studied by dilational surface rheology

The review discusses the mechanism of formation of protein/surfactant adsorption layers at the liquid - gas interface. The complexes of globular proteins usually preserve their compact structure a low surfactant concentrations. Therefore a simple kinetic model of the adsorption of charged compact nanoparticles is discussed first and compared with experimental data. The increase of surfactant concentrations results in various conformational transitions in the surface layer. One can obtain information on the changes of the adsorption layer structure using the dilational surface rheology. The kinetic dependencies of the dynamic surface elasticity are strongly different for the adsorption of unfolded macromolecules and compact globules, and have local maxima in the former case corresponding to different steps of the adsorption. These distinctions allow tracing the changes of the tertiary structure of protein/surfactant complexes in the surface layer. The adsorption from mixed solutions of ionic surfactants with β-casein, β-lactoglobulin, bovine serum albumin and myoglobin is discussed with some details.

Thermodynamics, interfacial pressure isotherms and dilational rheology of mixed protein-surfactant adsorption layers

Proteins and their mixtures with surfactants are widely used in many applications. The knowledge of their solution bulk behavior and its impact on the properties of interfacial layers made great progress in the recent years. Different mechanisms apply to the formation process of protein/surfactant complexes for ionic and non-ionic surfactants, which are governed mainly by electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions. The surface activity of these complexes is often remarkably different from that of the individual protein and has to be considered in respective theoretical models. At very low protein concentration, small amounts of added surfactants can change the surface activity of proteins remarkably, even though no strongly interfacial active complexes are observed. Also small added amounts of non-ionic surfactants change the surface activity of proteins in the range of small bulk concentrations or surface coverages. The modeling of the equilibrium adsorption behavior of proteins and their mixtures with surfactants has reached a rather high level. These models are suitable also to describe the high frequency limits of the dilational viscoelasticity of the interfacial layers. Depending on the nature of the protein/surfactant interactions and the changes in the interfacial layer composition rather complex dilational viscoelasticities can be observed and described by the available models. The differences in the interfacial behavior, often observed in literature for studies using different experimental methods, are at least partially explained by a depletion of proteins, surfactants and their complexes in the range of low concentrations. A correction of these depletion effects typically provides good agreement between the data obtained with different methods, such as drop and bubble profile tensiometry.