Assessment and Comparison of Database Search Engines for Peptidomic Applications

Optimization of protein identifications through the use of different chromatographic approaches and bioinformatic pipelines

RATIONALE

Selection of proteomic workflows for a given project can be a daunting task. This research provides a guide outlining the impact on protein identification of different steps such as chromatographic separation, data acquisition strategies, and bioinformatic pipelines. The data presented here will help experts and nonexpert proteomic users to increase proteome coverage and peptide identification.

METHODS

HeLa protein digests were analyzed through different C18 chromatographic columns (15 and 50 cm in length), using top 12 data-dependent acquisition (DDA), top 20 DDA, and data-independent acquisition (DIA) with a nanospray source in positive mode in a Thermo Q Exactive instrument. The raw data were analyzed using different search engines, rescoring approaches, and multi-engine searches. The results were analyzed in the context of peptide and protein identifications, precursor properties, and computation requirements to understand the differences between methods.

RESULTS

Our results showed that higher column lengths and top N DDA approaches were able to significantly increase protein identifications. The use of multiple search engines yielded limited gains, whereas the use of rescoring methods clearly outperformed other strategies. Finally, DIA approaches, although successful at generating new identifications, had a limited performance influenced by the previous collection of DDA data, which could prohibitively increase instrument time. Nonetheless, the use of library-free methods showed promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results highlight the impact of different experimental approaches on proteome coverage. Changes in chromatographic columns, data acquisition, or bioinformatic analysis can significantly increase the number of protein identifications (>400%). Thus, this research provides a reference upon which to build a successful proteomic workflow with different considerations at every step.

EndoGenius: Optimized Neuropeptide Identification from Mass Spectrometry Datasets

Neuropeptides represent a unique class of signaling molecules that have garnered much attention but require special consideration when identifications are gleaned from mass spectra. With highly variable sequence lengths, neuropeptides must be analyzed in their endogenous state. Further, neuropeptides share great homology within families, differing by as little as a single amino acid residue, complicating even routine analyses and necessitating optimized computational strategies for confident and accurate identifications. We present EndoGenius, a database searching strategy designed specifically for elucidating neuropeptide identifications from mass spectra by leveraging optimized peptide-spectrum matching approaches, an expansive motif database, and a novel scoring algorithm to achieve broader representation of the neuropeptidome and minimize reidentification. This work describes an algorithm capable of reporting more neuropeptide identifications at 1% false-discovery rate than alternative software in five Callinectes sapidus neuronal tissue types.

WOMBAT-P: Benchmarking Label-Free Proteomics Data Analysis Workflows

The inherent diversity of approaches in proteomics research has led to a wide range of software solutions for data analysis. These software solutions encompass multiple tools, each employing different algorithms for various tasks such as peptide-spectrum matching, protein inference, quantification, statistical analysis, and visualization. To enable an unbiased comparison of commonly used bottom-up label-free proteomics workflows, we introduce WOMBAT-P, a versatile platform designed for automated benchmarking and comparison. WOMBAT-P simplifies the processing of public data by utilizing the sample and data relationship format for proteomics (SDRF-Proteomics) as input. This feature streamlines the analysis of annotated local or public ProteomeXchange data sets, promoting efficient comparisons among diverse outputs. Through an evaluation using experimental ground truth data and a realistic biological data set, we uncover significant disparities and a limited overlap in the quantified proteins. WOMBAT-P not only enables rapid execution and seamless comparison of workflows but also provides valuable insights into the capabilities of different software solutions. These benchmarking metrics are a valuable resource for researchers in selecting the most suitable workflow for their specific data sets. The modular architecture of WOMBAT-P promotes extensibility and customization. The software is available at https://github.com/wombat-p/WOMBAT-Pipelines.

Origins, Technological Advancement, and Applications of Peptidomics

Peptidomics is the comprehensive characterization of peptides from biological sources instead of heading for a few single peptides in former peptide research. Mass spectrometry allows to detect a multitude of peptides in complex mixtures and thus enables new strategies leading to peptidomics. The term was established in the year 2001, and up to now, this new field has grown to over 3000 publications. Analytical techniques originally developed for fast and comprehensive analysis of peptides in proteomics were specifically adjusted for peptidomics. Although it is thus closely linked to proteomics, there are fundamental differences with conventional bottom-up proteomics. Fundamental technological advancements of peptidomics since have occurred in mass spectrometry and data processing, including quantification, and more slightly in separation technology. Different strategies and diverse sources of peptidomes are mentioned by numerous applications, such as discovery of neuropeptides and other bioactive peptides, including the use of biochemical assays. Furthermore, food and plant peptidomics are introduced similarly. Additionally, applications with a clinical focus are included, comprising biomarker discovery as well as immunopeptidomics. This overview extensively reviews recent methods, strategies, and applications including links to all other chapters of this book.

Current Challenges and Future Directions in Peptidomics

The field of peptidomics has been under development since its start more than 20 years ago. In this chapter we provide a personal outlook for future directions in this field. The applications of peptidomics technologies are spreading more and more from classical research of peptide hormones and neuropeptides towards commercial applications in plant and food-science. Many clinical applications have been developed to analyze the complexity of biofluids, which are being addressed with new instrumentation, automization, and data processing. Additionally, the newly developed field of immunopeptidomics is showing promise for cancer therapies. In conclusion, peptidomics will continue delivering important information in classical fields like neuropeptides and peptide hormones, benefiting from improvements in state-of-the-art technologies. Moreover, new directions of research such as immunopeptidomics will further complement classical omics technologies and may become routine clinical procedures. Taken together, discoveries of new substances, networks, and applications of peptides can be expected in different disciplines.