C–H Bond Activation via U(II) in the Reduction of Heteroleptic Bis(trimethylsilyl)amide U(III) Complexes

Accessing a Highly Reducing Uranium(III) Complex through Cyclometalation

U(IV) cyclometalated complexes have shown rich reactivity, but their low oxidation state analogues still remain rare. Herein, we report the isolation of [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][UIII{N(SiMe3)2}2(κ2-C,N-CH2SiMe2NSiMe3)], 1, from the reduction of [UIII{N(SiMe)2}3] with KC8 and 2.2.2-cryptand at room temperature. Cyclic voltammetry studies demonstrate that 1 has a reduction potential similar to that of the previously reported [K(2.2.2-cryptand)][UII{N(SiMe)2}3] (Epc = -2.6 V versus Fc+/0 and Epc = -2.8 V versus Fc+/0, respectively). Complex 1, indeed, shows similar reducing abilities upon reactions with 4,4'-bipyridine, 2,2'-bipyridine, and 1-azidoadamantane. Interestingly, 1 was also found to be the first example of a mononuclear U(III) complex that is capable of reducing pyridine. In addition, it is shown that a wide variety of substrates can be inserted into the U-C bond, forming new U(III) metallacycles. These results highlight that cyclometalated U(III) complexes can serve as versatile precursors for a broad range of reactivity and for assembling a variety of novel chemical architectures.

Oxidative Addition of E-H (E=C, N) Bonds to Transient Uranium(II) Centers

Two-electron oxidative addition is one of the most important elementary reactions for d-block transition metals but it is uncommon for f-block elements. Here, we report the first examples of intermolecular oxidative addition of E-H (E=C, N) bonds to uranium(II) centers. The transient U(II) species was formed in-situ by reducing a heterometallic cluster featuring U(IV)-Pd(0) bonds with potassium-graphite (KC8). Oxidative addition of C-H or N-H bonds to the U(II) centers was observed when this transient U(II) species was treated with benzene, carbazole or 1-adamantylamine, respectively. The U(II) centers could also react with tetracene, biphenylene or N2O, leading to the formation of arene reduced U(IV) products and uranyl(VI) species via two- or four-electron processes. This study demonstrates that the intermolecular two-electron oxidative addition reactions are viable for actinide elements.

Synthesis and Structure of [η5-1,2,4-(Me3Si)3C5H2]2Th(bipy) and Its Reactivity toward Small Molecules

Halide exchange of (Cp3tms)2ThCl2 (1; Cp3tms = η5-1,2,4-(Me3Si)3C5H2) with Me3SiI furnishes (Cp3tms)2ThI2 (2), which is then reduced with potassium graphite (KC8) in the presence of 2,2'-bipyridine to give the thorium bipyridyl metallocene (Cp3tms)2Th(bipy) (3) in good yield. Complex 3 was fully characterized and readily reacted with various small molecules. For example, 3 may serve as a synthetic equivalent for the (Cp3tms)2Th(II) fragment when exposed to CuI, Ph2S2, organic azides, and CS2. Moreover, upon the addition of thiobenzophenone Ph2CS, p-methylbenzaldehyde (p-MeC6H4)CHO, benzophenone Ph2CO, amidate PhCONH(p-tolyl), seleno-ketone (p,p'-dimethoxy), selenobenzophenone (p-MeOPh)2CSe, di(p-tolyl)methanimine (p-tolyl)2C═NH, 1,2-di(benzylidene)hydrazine (PhCH═N)2, and nitriles PhCN, PhCH2CN, and Ph2CHCN C-C coupling results to give (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy)(Ph2CS)] (8), (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy)(p-MePhCHO)] (9), (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy)(Ph2CO)] (10), (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy){(p-tolylNH)(Ph)CO}] (11), (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy){(p-MeOPh)2CSe}] (12), (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy){(p-tolyl)2CNH}] (13), (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy)(PhCHNN═CHPh)] (14), (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy)(PhCN)] (16), (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy)(PhCH2CN)] (17), and (Cp3tms)2Th[(bipy)(Ph2CHCN)] (18), respectively. However, when thiazole is added to 3, the dimeric sulfido complex [(Cp3tms)2Th]2[μ-(bipy)CH2NCHCHS]2 (15) can be isolated. Moreover, the addition of isonitriles such as Me3CNC and PhCH2NC to 3 results in C-N bond cleavage and C-C coupling processes to form the thorium isocyanido amido complexes (Cp3tms)2Th[4-(Me3C)bipy](NC) (19) and (Cp3tms)2Th[4-(PhCH2)bipy](NC) (20), respectively. Nevertheless, upon exposure of 3 to (trimethylsilyl)diazomethane Me3SiCHN2, the bis-amido complex (Cp3tms)2Th[5,6-(Me3SiCH)bipy] (21), concomitant with N2 release, is isolated.

Investigating Steric and Electronic Effects in the Synthesis of Square Planar 6d1 Th(III) Complexes

The factors affecting the formation and crystal structures of unusual 6d1 Th(III) square planar aryloxide complexes, as exemplified by [Th(OArMe)4]1- (OArMe = OC6H2tBu2-2,6-Me-4), were explored by synthetic and reduction studies of a series of related Th(IV) tetrakis(aryloxide) complexes, Th(OArR)4 (OArR = OC6H2tBu2-2,6-R-4). Specifically, electronic, steric, and countercation effects were explored by varying the aryloxide ligand, the alkali metal reducing agent, and the alkali metal chelating agent. Salt metathesis reactions between ThBr4(DME)2 (DME = 1,2-dimethoxyethane) and 4 equiv of the appropriate potassium aryloxide salt were used to prepare a series of Th(IV) aryloxide complexes in high yields: Th(OArH)4 (OArH = OC6H3tBu2-2,6), Th(OArtBu)4 (OArtBu = OC6H2tBu3-2,4,6), Th(OArOMe)4 (OArOMe = OC6H2tBu2-2,6-OMe-4), and Th(OArPh)4 (OArPh = OC6H2tBu2-2,6-Ph-4). Th(OArH)4 can be reduced by KC8, Na, or Li in the absence or presence of 2.2.2-cryptand (crypt) or 18-crown-6 (crown) to form dark purple solutions that have EPR and UV-visible spectra similar to those of the square planar Th(III) complex, [Th(OArMe)4]1-. Hence, the para position of the aryloxide ligand does not have to be alkylated to obtain the Th(III) complexes. Furthermore, reduction of Th(OArOMe)4, Th(OArtBu)4, and Th(OArPh)4 with KC8 in THF generated purple solutions with EPR and UV-visible spectra that are similar to those of the previously reported Th(III) anion, [Th(OArMe)4]1-. Although many of these reduction reactions did not produce single crystals suitable for study by X-ray diffraction, reduction of Th(OArH)4, Th(OArtBu)4, and Th(OArOMe)4 with Li provided X-ray quality crystals whose structures had square planar coordination geometries. Reduction of Th(OArPh)4 with Li also gave a product with EPR and UV-visible spectra that matched those of [Th(OArMe)4]1-, but X-ray quality crystals of the reduction product were too unstable to provide data. Neither Th(Odipp)4(THF)2 (Odipp = OC6H3iPr2-2,6) nor Th(Odmp)4(THF)2 (Odmp = OC6H3Me2-2,6) could be reduced to Th(III) products under similar conditions. Reduction of U(OArH)3(THF) with KC8 in the presence of 2.2.2-cryptand (crypt) was examined for comparison and formed [K(crypt)][U(OArH)4], which has a tetrahedral arrangement of the aryloxide ligands. Moreover, no further reduction was observed when either [K(crypt)][U(OArH)4] or [K(crown)(THF)2][U(OArH)4] were treated with KC8 or Li.

Perplexing EPR Signals from 5f36d1 U(II) Complexes

Metal complexes with unpaired electrons in orbitals of different angular momentum quantum numbers (e.g., f and d orbitals) are unusual and opportunities to study the interactions among these electrons are rare. X-band electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) data were collected at <10 and 77 K on 10 U(II) complexes with 5f36d1 electron configurations and on some analogous Ce(II), Pr(II), and Nd(II) complexes with 4fn5d1 electron configurations. The U(II) compounds unexpectedly display similar two-line axial signals with g|| = 2.04 and g⊥ = 2.00 at 77 K. In contrast, U(II) complexes with 5f4 configurations are EPR-silent. Unlike U(II), the congenic 4f35d1 Nd(II) complex is EPR-silent. The Ce(II) complex with a 4f15d1 configuration is also EPR-silent, but a signal is observed for the Pr(II) complex, which has a 4f25d1 configuration. Whether or not an EPR signal is expected for these complexes depends on the coupling between f and d electrons. Since the coupling in U(II) systems is expected to be sufficiently strong to preclude an EPR signal from compounds with a 5f36d1 configuration, the results are viewed as unexplained phenomena. However, they do show that 5f36d1 U(II) samples can be differentiated from 5f4 U(II) complexes by EPR spectroscopy.

Synthesis of Trimethyltriazacyclohexane (Me3tach) Sandwich Complexes of Uranium, Neptunium, and Plutonium Triiodides: (Me3tach)2AnI3

1,3,5-Trimethyl-1,3,5-triazacyclohexane (Me₃tach) readily complexes uranium triiodide to form (Me₃tach)₂UI₃. The complex is soluble in THF and arenes and can function as a source of UI₃ to form organometallic U(III) complexes. When dissolved in pyridine (py), (Me₃tach)₂UI₃ forms (Me₃tach)UI₃(py)₂. A related complex with the larger 1,4,7-trimethyl-1,4,7-triazacyclononane (Me₃tacn) ligand, namely (Me₃tacn)UI₃(THF), was synthesized for comparison. Since X-ray quality crystals of (Me₃tach)₂UI₃ can be synthesized in high yield even with small-scale reactions, the system is ideal for extension to transuranium elements. Accordingly, the neptunium and plutonium complexes (Me₃tach)₂NpI₃ and (Me₃tach)₂PuI₃ were synthesized in an analogous manner from NpI₃(THF)₄ and PuI₃(THF)₄, respectively.

Expanding Bismuth Trihalide Coordination Chemistry with Trimethyltriazacyclohexane and Trimethyltriazacyclononane

1,3,5-Trimethyltriazacyclohexane, Me₃tach, readily adds to bismuth triiodide to form a variety of new coordination compounds depending on the stoichiometry, solvent, and crystallization conditions. X-ray crystallographic evidence has been obtained for both 2:1 and 1:1 Me₃tach:Bi complexes with formulas of [(Me₃tach)₂BiI₂][(Me₃tach)BiI₄], [(Me₃tach)₂BiI₂]₃[Bi₂I₉][I][HMe₃tach]·THF, and (Me₃tach)BiI₃(py)₂. The related chloride structure (Me₃tach)BiCl₃(py)₂ forms from BiCl₃. The structure of (Me₃tacn)BiI₃ with the larger chelate, 1,4,7-trimethyltriazacyclononane, Me₃tacn, was obtained for comparison, and the polymeric structure of BiI₃ in THF was defined as [BiI(THF)(μ-I)₂]_n.

Does Reduction-Induced Isomerization of a Uranium(III) Aryl Complex Proceed via C-H Oxidative Addition and Reductive Elimination across the Uranium(II/IV) Redox Couple?

Reaction of the uranium(III) bis(amidinate) aryl complex {TerphC(NⁱPr)₂}₂U(Terph) (2, where Terph = 4,4″-di-tert-butyl-m-terphenyl-2'-yl) with a strong reductant enabled isolation of isomeric uranium(III) bis(amidinate) aryl product {TerphC(NⁱPr)₂}₂U(Terph*) (3, where Terph* = 4,4″-di-tert-butyl-m-terphenyl-4'-yl). In terms of connectivity, 3 differs from 2 only in the positions of the U-C and C-H bonds on the central aryl ring of the m-terphenyl-based ligand. A deuterium labeling study ruled out mechanisms for this isomerization involving intermolecular abstraction or deprotonation of the ligand C-H bonds activated during the reaction. Due to the complexity of this rapid, heterogeneous reaction, experimental studies could not further distinguish between two different intramolecular C-H activation mechanisms. However, high-level computational studies were consistent with a mechanism that included two sets of unimolecular, mononuclear C-H oxidative addition and reductive elimination steps involving uranium(II/IV).

Synthesis and Reduction of Heteroleptic Bis(cyclopentadienyl) Uranium(III) Complexes

Heteroleptic U(III) complexes supported by bis(cyclopentadienyl) frameworks have been synthesized to examine their suitability as precursors to U(II) complexes. The newly synthesized (C₅Me₅)₂U(OC₆H₂^tBu₂-2,6-Me-4), (C₅Me₅)₂U(OC₆H₂Ad₂-2,6-^tBu-4) (Ad = 1-adamantyl), (C₅Me₅)₂U(C₅H₅), and (C₅Me₅)₂U(C₅Me₄H) are compared with (C₅Me₅)₂U[N(SiMe₃)₂], (C₅Me₅)₂U[CH(SiMe₃)₂], and (C₅Me₅)U[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂. An improved synthesis of (C₅Me₅)₂U(μ-Ph)₂BPh₂ was developed, which was used to synthesize (C₅Me₅)₂U(C₅Me₄H). Since the X-ray crystal structure of (C₅Me₅)₂U(OC₆H₂^tBu₂-2,6-Me-4) contained two very different molecules in the asymmetric unit with 115.7(5)° and 166.0(5)° U-O-C_ipso angles, the (C₅Me₄H)₂U(OC₆H₂^tBu₂-2,6-Me-4) and (C₅Me₅)₂Ce(OC₆H₂^tBu₂-2,6-Me-4) analogues were synthesized and characterized by X-ray diffraction for comparison. Electrochemical studies in THF with a 100 mM [ⁿBu₄N][BPh₄] supporting electrolyte showed U(IV)/U(III) and U(III)/U(II) redox couples for all the heteroleptic complexes except (C₅Me₅)₂U(C₅H₅). Chemical reduction of all heteroleptic compounds formed dark blue solutions characteristic of U(II) when reacted with KC₈ at -78 °C, but none formed isolable U(II) complexes. The targeted U(II) complexes, [(C₅Me₅)₂U(OC₆H₂^tBu₂-2,6-Me-4)]^1-, {(C₅Me₅)₂U[CH(SiMe₃)₂]}^1-, [(C₅Me₅)₂U(C₅H₅)]^1-, and [(C₅Me₅)₂U(C₅Me₄H)]^1-, were analyzed by density functional theory, and a 5f³6d¹ electron configuration was found to be the ground state in each case.

Anion-induced disproportionation of Th(III) complexes to form Th(II) and Th(IV) products

A new synthesis of Th(II) complexes has been identified involving addition of simple MX salts (M = Li, Na, K; X = H, Cl, Me, N₃) to Cp''₃Th^III [Cp'' = [C₅H₃(SiMe₃)₂] in the presence of 18-crown-6 or 2.2.2-cryptand, forming [M(chelate)][Cp''₃Th^II] and Cp''₃Th^IVX. Cp^tet₃Th^III (Cp^tet = C₅Me₄H) reacts with KH to form Cp^tet₃Th^IVH and the C-H bond activation product, [K(crypt)]{[Cp^tet₂Th^IVH[η¹:η⁵-C₅Me₃H(CH₂)]}.

2.2.2-Cryptand complexes of neptunium(III) and plutonium(III)

New coordination environments are reported for Np(III) and Pu(III) based on pilot studies of U(III) in 2.2.2-cryptand (crypt). The U(III)-in-crypt complex, [U(crypt)I₂][I], obtained from the reaction between UI₃ and crypt, is treated with Me₃SiOTf (OTf = O₃SCF₃) in benzene to form the [U(crypt)(OTf)₂][OTf] complex. Similarly, the isomorphous Np(III) and Pu(III) complexes were obtained similarly starting from [AnI₃(THF)₄]. All three complexes (1-An; An = U, Np, Pu) contain an encapsulated actinide in a THF-soluble complex. Absorption spectroscopy and DFT calculations are consistent with 5f³ U(III), 5f⁴ Np(III), and 5f⁵ Pu(III) electron configurations.

Density Functional Theory Analysis of the Importance of Coordination Geometry for 5f36d1 versus 5f4 Electron Configurations in U(II) Complexes

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations on four known and seven hypothetical U(II) complexes indicate the importance of coordination geometry in favoring 5f³6d¹ versus 5f⁴ electronic ground states. The known [Cp″₃U]^-, [Cp^tet₃U]^-, and [U(NR₂)₃]^- [Cp″ = C₅H₃(SiMe₃)₂, Cp^tet = C₅Me₄H, and R = SiMe₃] anions were found to have 5f³6d¹ ground states, while a 5f⁴ ground state was found for the known compound (NHAr^iPr₆)₂U. The UV-visible spectra of the known 5f³6d¹ compounds were simulated via time-dependent DFT and are in qualitative agreement with the experimental spectra. For the hypothetical U(II) compounds, the 5f³6d¹ configuration is predicted for [U(CHR₂)₃]^-, [U(H₃BH)₃]^-, [U(OAr')₄]^2-, and [(C₈H₈)U]^2- (OAr' = O-C₆H₂^tBu₂-2,6-Me-4). In the case of [U(bnz')₄]^2- (bnz' = CH₂-C₆H₄^tBu-4), a 5f³ configuration with a ligand-based radical was found as the ground state.

The synthesis and versatile reducing power of low-valent uranium complexes

This synthesis and diverse reactivity of uranium(iii) and uranium(ii) complexes is discussed.