Synthesis and Reactivity of a U(IV) Dibenzyne Complex

Oxidative Addition of E-H (E=C, N) Bonds to Transient Uranium(II) Centers

Two-electron oxidative addition is one of the most important elementary reactions for d-block transition metals but it is uncommon for f-block elements. Here, we report the first examples of intermolecular oxidative addition of E-H (E=C, N) bonds to uranium(II) centers. The transient U(II) species was formed in-situ by reducing a heterometallic cluster featuring U(IV)-Pd(0) bonds with potassium-graphite (KC8). Oxidative addition of C-H or N-H bonds to the U(II) centers was observed when this transient U(II) species was treated with benzene, carbazole or 1-adamantylamine, respectively. The U(II) centers could also react with tetracene, biphenylene or N2O, leading to the formation of arene reduced U(IV) products and uranyl(VI) species via two- or four-electron processes. This study demonstrates that the intermolecular two-electron oxidative addition reactions are viable for actinide elements.

Progress in Nonaqueous Molecular Uranium Chemistry: Where to Next?

There is long-standing interest in nonaqueous uranium chemistry because of fundamental questions about uranium's variable chemical bonding and the similarities of this pseudo-Group 6 element to its congener d-block elements molybdenum and tungsten. To provide historical context, with reference to a conference presentation slide presented around 1988 that advanced a defining collection of top targets, and the challenge, for synthetic actinide chemistry to realize in isolable complexes under normal experimental conditions, this Viewpoint surveys progress against those targets, including (i) CO and related π-acid ligand complexes, (ii) alkylidenes, carbynes, and carbidos, (iii) imidos and terminal nitrides, (iv) homoleptic polyalkyls, -alkoxides, and -aryloxides, (v) uranium-uranium bonds, and (vi) examples of topics that can be regarded as branching out in parallel from the leading targets. Having summarized advances from the past four decades, opportunities to build on that progress, and hence possible future directions for the field, are highlighted. The wealth and diversity of uranium chemistry that is described emphasizes the importance of ligand-metal complementarity in developing exciting new chemistry that builds our knowledge and understanding of elements in a relativistic regime.

Formation and Structure of Gas-Phase Lanthanide(III) Cyanobenzyne Complex (η2-4-CNC6H3)LnCl2-, Obtained via Both the Single- and Dual-Ligand Strategies

The lanthanide(III) cyanobenzyne complexes (η2-4-CNC6H3)LnCl2- (Ln = La-Lu except Eu; Pm was not examined) were generated in the gas phase using an electrospray ionization mass spectrometry coupled with collision-induced dissociation (CID) technique. For all lanthanides except Sm, Eu, and Yb, (4-CNC6H3)LnCl2- can be generated either via a single-ligand strategy through consecutive CO2 and HCl losses of (4-CNC6H4CO2)LnCl3- or via a dual-ligand strategy through successive CO2/C6H5CN or 4-CNC6H4CO2H and CO2 losses of (4-CNC6H4CO2)2LnCl2-. For Sm and Yb, although only reduction products LnCl3- were formed upon CID of (4-CNC6H4CO2)LnCl3-, (4-CNC6H3)LnCl2- were obtained via the dual-ligand strategy without the appearances of other products. CID of (4-CNC6H4CO2)EuCl3- and (4-CNC6H4CO2)2EuCl2- gave EuCl3- and the cyanophenyl complex (4-CNC6H4)EuCl2-, respectively, in both of which the +III oxidation state of Eu was reduced to +II. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that (4-CNC6H3)LnCl2- are formally described as Ln(III) cyanobenzyne complexes, (η2-4-CNC6H3)LnCl2-, with the dianionic cyanobenzyne ligand (4-CNC6H32-) coordinating to the Ln(III) centers through two Ln-C σ bonds, which is in accordance with their reactivities toward water. Benzyne and substituted benzyne complexes (XC6H3)LuCl2- (X = H, 3-CN, 4-F, 4-Cl, and 4-CH3) were also synthesized in the gas phase via the single- and dual-ligand strategies.

Dual-Ligand Strategy for the Preparation of Gas-Phase Uranyl(VI) Benzyne Complexes from Uranyl(VI) Benzoates

The uranyl(VI) benzyne complex (η²-C₆H₄)UO₂Cl^- was prepared in the gas phase by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry coupled with collision-induced dissociation. It was formed via a dual-ligand strategy that requires the elimination of benzoic acid or benzene/CO₂ from the uranyl dibenzoate precursor (C₆H₅CO₂)₂UO₂Cl^-. This contrasts the known strategy for the formation of gas-phase benzyne complexes that would result from CO₂/HCl elimination from (C₆H₅CO₂)UO₂Cl₂^-, during which only one benzoate ligand is involved. Such dual-ligand strategy can be extended to the preparation of a series of methyl- and halo-substituted benzyne complexes of uranyl(VI). Density functional theory calculations at the B3LYP level reveal that the benzyne complex (η²-C₆H₄)UO₂Cl^- features a metallacyclopropene structure with the C₆H₄^2- ligand coordinated to uranium(VI) through two polarized U-C_benzyne σ bonds, in accordance with the reactivity test toward water. Dehydrochlorination of the benzyne complex (η²-C₆H₄)UO₂Cl^- from (C₆H₅)UO₂Cl₂^- that originates from decarboxylation of (C₆H₅CO₂)UO₂Cl₂^- with a single benzoate ligand is neither kinetically nor thermodynamically favorable than simple C₆H₅ radical loss to give U^VO₂Cl₂^-. This arises from the presence of an accessible V oxidation state for uranium and accounts for the necessity for the dual-ligand strategy in the preparation of uranyl(VI) benzyne complexes from uranyl benzoate precursors.

Gas-phase synthesis and structure of thorium benzyne complexes

The thorium benzyne complex (η²-C₆H₄)ThCl₃^- was synthesized in the gas phase through consecutive decarboxylation and dehydrochlorination from the (C₆H₅CO₂)ThCl₄^- precursor upon collision-induced dissociation. Theoretical calculations suggest that (η²-C₆H₄)ThCl₃^- exhibits a metallacyclopropene structure with two polarized Th-C_benzyne σ bonds. This procedure can be generally extended to the synthesis of a wide range of gas-phase thorium benzyne complexes.

Homoleptic Perchlorophenyl "Ate" Complexes of Thorium(IV) and Uranium(IV)

The reaction of AnCl₄(DME)_n (An = Th, n = 2; U, n = 0) with 5 equiv of LiC₆Cl₅ in Et₂O resulted in the formation of homoleptic actinide-aryl "ate" complexes [Li(DME)₂(Et₂O)]₂[Li(DME)₂][Th(C₆Cl₅)₅]₃ ([Li][1]) and [Li(Et₂O)₄][U(C₆Cl₅)₅] ([Li][2]). Similarly, the reaction of AnCl₄(DME)_n (An = Th, n = 2; U, n = 0) with 3 equiv of LiC₆Cl₅ in Et₂O resulted in the formation of heteroleptic actinide-aryl "ate" complexes [Li(DME)₂(Et₂O)][Li(Et₂O)₂][ThCl₃(C₆Cl₅)₃] ([Li][3]) and [Li(Et₂O)₃][UCl₂(C₆Cl₅)₃] ([Li][4]). Density functional calculations show that the An-C_ipso σ-bonds are considerably more covalent for the uranium complexes vs the thorium analogues, in line with past results. Additionally, good agreement between experiment and calculations is obtained for the ¹³C_ipso NMR chemical shifts in [Li][1] and [Li][3]. The calculations demonstrate a deshielding by ca. 29 ppm from spin-orbit coupling effects originating at Th, which is a direct consequence of 5f orbital participation in the Th-C bonds.

Synthesis and Characterization of Two Uranyl-Aryl "Ate" Complexes

Reaction of [UO₂ Cl₂ (THF)₃ ] with 3 equivalents of LiC₆ Cl₅ in Et₂ O resulted in the formation of first uranyl aryl complex [Li(Et₂ O)₂ (THF)][UO₂ (C₆ Cl₅ )₃ ] ([Li][1]) in good yields. Subsequent dissolution of [Li][1] in THF resulted in conversion into [Li(THF)₄ ][UO₂ (C₆ Cl₅ )₃ (THF)] ([Li][2]), also in good yields. DFT calculations reveal that the U-C bonds in [Li][1] and [Li][2] exhibit appreciable covalency. Additionally, the ¹³ C NMR chemical shifts for their C_ipso environments are strongly affected by spin-orbit coupling-a consequence of 5f orbital participation in the U-C bonds.

Uranium(iii) and thorium(iv) alkyl complexes as potential starting materials

The synthesis and characterisation of a rare U(iii) alkyl complex, U[η⁴-Me₂NC(H)C₆H₅]₃, using the dimethylbenzylamine (DMBA) ligand has been accomplished. While attempting to prepare the U(iv) compound, reduction to the U(iii) complex occurred. In the analogous Th(iv) system, C-H bond activation of a methyl group of one dimethylamine was observed yielding Th[η⁴-Me₂NC(H)C₆H₅]₂[η⁵-(CH₂)MeNC(H)C₆H₅] with a dianionic DMBA ligand. The utility of these complexes as starting materials has been analyzed using a bulky dithiocarboxylate ligand to yield tetravalent actinide species.

A Homoleptic Uranium(III) Tris(aryl) Complex

The reaction of 3 equiv of Li-C₆H₃-2,6-(C₆H₄-4-^tBu)₂ (Terph-Li) with UI₃(1,4-dioxane)_1.5 led to the formation of the homoleptic uranium(III) tris(aryl) complex (Terph)₃U (1). The U-C bonds are reactive: treatment with excess ⁱPrN═C═NⁱPr yielded the double-insertion product [TerphC(NⁱPr)₂]₂U(Terph) (2). Complexes 1 and 2 were characterized by X-ray crystallography, which showed that the U-C bond length in 2 (2.624(4) Å) is ∼0.1 Å longer than the average U-C bond length in 1 (2.522(2) Å). Thermal decomposition of 1 yielded Terph-H as the only identifiable product; the process is unimolecular with activation parameters ΔH^⧧ = 21.5 ± 0.3 kcal/mol and ΔS^⧧ = -7.5 ± 0.8 cal·mol^-1 K^-1, consistent with intramolecular proton abstraction. The protonolysis chemistry of 1 was also explored, which led to the uranium(IV) alkoxide complex U(OCPh₃)₄(DME) (3·DME).