Controlling Structure and Reactivity in Cationic Solid-State Molecular Organometallic Systems Using Anion Templating

A comparison of non-covalent interactions in the crystal structures of two σ-alkane complexes of Rh exhibiting contrasting stabilities in the solid state

Non-covalent interactions surrounding the cationic Rh σ-alkane complexes within the crystal structures of [(Cy2PCH2CH2PCy2)Rh(NBA)][BArF4], [1-NBA][BArF4] (NBA = norbornane, C7H12; ArF = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3), and [1-propane][BArF4] are analysed using Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM) and Independent Gradient Model approaches, the latter under a Hirshfeld partitioning scheme (IGMH). In both structures the cations reside in an octahedral array of [BArF4]- anions within which the [1-NBA]+ cation system exhibits a greater number of C-H⋯F contacts to the anions. QTAIM and IGMH analyses indicate these include the strongest individual atom-atom non-covalent interactions between the cation and the anion in these systems. The IGMH approach highlights the directionality of these C-H⋯F contacts that contrasts with the more diffuse C-H⋯π interactions. The accumulative effects of the latter lead to a more significant stabilizing contribution. IGMH %δGatom plots provide a particularly useful visual tool to identify key interactions and highlight the importance of a -{C3H6}- propylene moiety that is present within both the propane and NBA ligands (the latter as a truncated -{C3H4}- unit) and the cyclohexyl rings of the phosphine substituents. The potential for this to act as a privileged motif that confers stability on the crystal structures of σ-alkane complexes in the solid-state is discussed. The greater number of C-H⋯F inter-ion interactions in the [1-NBA][BArF4] system, coupled with more significant C-H⋯π interactions are all consistent with greater non-covalent stabilisation around the [1-NBA]+ cation. This is also supported by larger computed δGatom indices as a measure of cation-anion non-covalent interaction energy.

MicroED characterization of a robust cationic σ-alkane complex stabilized by the [B(3,5-(SF5)2C6H3)4]- anion, via on-grid solid/gas single-crystal to single-crystal reactivity

Microcrystalline (∼1 μm) [Rh(Cy₂PCH₂CH₂PCy₂)(norbornadiene)][S-BAr^F₄], [S-BAr^F₄] = [B(3,5-(SF₅)₂C₆H₃)₄]⁻, reacts with H₂ in a single-crystal to single-crystal transformation to form the σ-alkane complex [Rh(Cy₂PCH₂CH₂PCy₂)(norbornane)][S-BAr^F₄], for which the structure was determined by microcrystal Electron Diffraction (microED), to 0.95 Å resolution, via an on-grid hydrogenation, and a complementary single-crystal X-ray diffraction study on larger, but challenging to isolate, crystals. Comparison with the [BAr^F₄]⁻ analogue [Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂(C₆H₃)] shows that the [S-BAr^F₄]⁻ anion makes the σ-alkane complex robust towards decomposition both thermally and when suspended in pentane. Subsequent reactivity with dissolved ethene in a pentane slurry, forms [Rh(Cy₂PCH₂CH₂PCy₂)(ethene)₂][S-BAr^F₄], and the catalytic dimerisation/isomerisation of ethene to 2-butenes. The increased stability of [S-BAr^F₄]⁻ salts is identified as being due to increased non-covalent interactions in the lattice, resulting in a solid-state molecular organometallic material with desirable stability characteristics.

The thermally and chemically robust σ-alkane complex [Rh(Cy₂PCH₂CH₂PCy₂)(norborane)][B(3,5-(SF₅)₂C₆H₃)₄] is characterized by micro-electron diffraction using on-grid single-crystal to single-crystal reactivity.

Metathesis by Partner Interchange in σ-Bond Ligands: Expanding Applications of the σ-CAM Mechanism

In 2007 two of us defined the σ-Complex Assisted Metathesis mechanism (Perutz and Sabo-Etienne, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 2578-2592), that is, the σ-CAM concept. This new approach to reaction mechanisms brought together metathesis reactions involving the formation of a variety of metal-element bonds through partner-interchange of σ-bond complexes. The key concept that defines a σ-CAM process is a single transition state for metathesis that is connected by two intermediates that are σ-bond complexes while the oxidation state of the metal remains constant in precursor, intermediates and product. This mechanism is appropriate in situations where σ-bond complexes have been isolated or computed as well-defined minima. Unlike several other mechanisms, it does not define the nature of the transition state. In this review, we highlight advances in the characterization and dynamic rearrangements of σ-bond complexes, most notably alkane and zincane complexes, but also different geometries of silane and borane complexes. We set out a selection of catalytic and stoichiometric examples of the σ-CAM mechanism that are supported by strong experimental and/or computational evidence. We then draw on these examples to demonstrate that the scope of the σ-CAM mechanism has expanded to classes of reaction not envisaged in 2007 (additional σ-bond ligands, agostic complexes, sp2 -carbon, surfaces). Finally, we provide a critical comparison to alternative mechanisms for metathesis of metal-element bonds.

A Series of Crystallographically Characterized Linear and Branched σ-Alkane Complexes of Rhodium: From Propane to 3-Methylpentane

Using solid-state molecular organometallic (SMOM) techniques, in particular solid/gas single-crystal to single-crystal reactivity, a series of σ-alkane complexes of the general formula [Rh(Cy2PCH2CH2PCy2)(ηn:ηm-alkane)][BArF4] have been prepared (alkane = propane, 2-methylbutane, hexane, 3-methylpentane; ArF = 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3). These new complexes have been characterized using single crystal X-ray diffraction, solid-state NMR spectroscopy and DFT computational techniques and present a variety of Rh(I)···H-C binding motifs at the metal coordination site: 1,2-η2:η2 (2-methylbutane), 1,3-η2:η2 (propane), 2,4-η2:η2 (hexane), and 1,4-η1:η2 (3-methylpentane). For the linear alkanes propane and hexane, some additional Rh(I)···H-C interactions with the geminal C-H bonds are also evident. The stability of these complexes with respect to alkane loss in the solid state varies with the identity of the alkane: from propane that decomposes rapidly at 295 K to 2-methylbutane that is stable and instead undergoes an acceptorless dehydrogenation to form a bound alkene complex. In each case the alkane sits in a binding pocket defined by the {Rh(Cy2PCH2CH2PCy2)}+ fragment and the surrounding array of [BArF4]- anions. For the propane complex, a small alkane binding energy, driven in part by a lack of stabilizing short contacts with the surrounding anions, correlates with the fleeting stability of this species. 2-Methylbutane forms more short contacts within the binding pocket, and as a result the complex is considerably more stable. However, the complex of the larger 3-methylpentane ligand shows lower stability. Empirically, there therefore appears to be an optimal fit between the size and shape of the alkane and overall stability. Such observations are related to guest/host interactions in solution supramolecular chemistry and the holistic role of 1°, 2°, and 3° environments in metalloenzymes.

Selectivity of Rh⋅⋅⋅H-C Binding in a σ-Alkane Complex Controlled by the Secondary Microenvironment in the Solid State

Single-crystal to single-crystal solid-state molecular organometallic (SMOM) techniques are used for the synthesis and structural characterization of the σ-alkane complex [Rh(tBu2 PCH2 CH2 CH2 PtBu2 )(η2 ,η2 -C7 H12 )][BArF 4 ] (ArF =3,5-(CF3 )2 C6 H3 ), in which the alkane (norbornane) binds through two exo-C-H⋅⋅⋅Rh interactions. In contrast, the bis-cyclohexyl phosphine analogue shows endo-alkane binding. A comparison of the two systems, supported by periodic DFT calculations, NCI plots and Hirshfeld surface analyses, traces this different regioselectivity to subtle changes in the local microenvironment surrounding the alkane ligand. A tertiary periodic structure supporting a secondary microenvironment that controls binding at the metal site has parallels with enzymes. The new σ-alkane complex is also a catalyst for solid/gas 1-butene isomerization, and catalyst resting states are identified for this.

Highly Active Gas Phase Organometallic Catalysis Supported Within Metal-Organic Framework Pores

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) can act as a platform for the heterogenization of molecular catalysts, providing improved stability, allowing easy catalyst recovery and a route toward structural elucidation of the active catalyst. We have developed a MOF, 1, possessing vacant N,N-chelating sites which are accessible via the porous channels that penetrate the structure. In the present work, cationic rhodium(I) norbornadiene (NBD) and bis(ethylene) (ETH) complexes paired with both noncoordinating and coordinating anions have been incorporated into the N,N-chelation sites of 1 via postsynthetic metalation and facile anion exchange. Exploiting the crystallinity of the host framework, the immobilized Rh(I) complexes were structurally characterized using X-ray crystallography. Ethylene hydrogenation catalysis by 1·[Rh(NBD)]X and 1·[Rh(ETH)₂]X (X = Cl and BF₄) was studied in the gas phase (2 bar, 46 °C) to reveal that 1·[Rh(ETH)₂](BF₄) was the most active catalyst (TOF = 64 h^-1); the NBD materials and the chloride salt were notably less active. On the basis of these observations, the activity of the Rh(I) bis(ethylene) complexes, 1·[Rh(ETH)₂]BF₄ and 1·[Rh(ETH)₂]Cl, in butene isomerization was also studied using gas-phase NMR spectroscopy. Under one bar of butene at 46 °C, 1·[Rh(ETH)₂]BF₄ rapidly catalyzes the conversion of 1-butene to 2-butene with a TOF averaging 2000 h^-1 over five cycles. Notably, the chloride derivative, 1 [Rh(ETH)₂]Cl displays negligible activity in comparison. XPS analysis of the postcatalysis sample, supported by DFT calculations, suggest that the catalytic activity is inhibited by the strong interactions between a Rh(III) allyl hydride intermediate and the chloride anion.

Solid-State Molecular Organometallic Catalysis in Gas/Solid Flow (Flow-SMOM) as Demonstrated by Efficient Room Temperature and Pressure 1-Butene Isomerization

The use of solid–state molecular organometallic chemistry (SMOM–chem) to promote the efficient double bond isomerization of 1-butene to 2-butenes under flow–reactor conditions is reported. Single crystalline catalysts based upon the σ-alkane complexes [Rh(R₂PCH₂CH₂PR₂)(η²η²-NBA)][BAr^F₄] (R = Cy, ^tBu; NBA = norbornane; Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃) are prepared by hydrogenation of a norbornadiene precursor. For the ^tBu-substituted system this results in the loss of long-range order, which can be re-established by addition of 1-butene to the material to form a mixture of [Rh(^tBu₂PCH₂CH₂P^tBu₂)(cis-2-butene)][BAr^F₄] and [Rh(^tBu₂PCH₂CH₂P^tBu₂)(1-butene)][BAr^F₄], in an order/disorder/order phase change. Deployment under flow-reactor conditions results in very different on-stream stabilities. With R = Cy rapid deactivation (3 h) to the butadiene complex occurs, [Rh(Cy₂PCH₂CH₂PCy₂)(butadiene)][BAr^F₄], which can be reactivated by simple addition of H₂. While the equivalent butadiene complex does not form with R = ^tBu at 298 K and on-stream conversion is retained up to 90 h, deactivation is suggested to occur via loss of crystallinity of the SMOM catalyst. Both systems operate under the industrially relevant conditions of an isobutene co-feed. cis:trans selectivites for 2-butene are biased in favor of cis for the ^tBu system and are more leveled for Cy.

Modulation of σ-Alkane Interactions in [Rh(L2)(alkane)]+ Solid-State Molecular Organometallic (SMOM) Systems by Variation of the Chelating Phosphine and Alkane: Access to η2,η2-σ-Alkane Rh(I), η1-σ-Alkane Rh(III) Complexes, and Alkane Encapsulation

Solid/gas single-crystal to single-crystal (SC-SC) hydrogenation of appropriate diene precursors forms the corresponding σ-alkane complexes [Rh(Cy₂P(CH₂) _nPCy₂)(L)][BAr^F₄] ( n = 3, 4) and [ RhH(Cy₂P(CH₂)₂( CH)(CH₂)₂PCy₂)(L)][BAr^F₄] ( n = 5, L = norbornane, NBA; cyclooctane, COA). Their structures, as determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, have cations exhibiting Rh···H-C σ-interactions which are modulated by both the chelating ligand and the identity of the alkane, while all sit in an octahedral anion microenvironment. These range from chelating η²,η² Rh···H-C (e.g., [Rh(Cy₂P(CH₂) _nPCy₂)(η²η²-NBA)][BAr^F₄], n = 3 and 4), through to more weakly bound η¹ Rh···H-C in which C-H activation of the chelate backbone has also occurred (e.g., [ RhH(Cy₂P(CH₂)₂( CH)(CH₂)₂PCy₂)(η¹-COA)][BAr^F₄]) and ultimately to systems where the alkane is not ligated with the metal center, but sits encapsulated in the supporting anion microenvironment, [Rh(Cy₂P(CH₂)₃PCy₂)][COA⊂BAr^F₄], in which the metal center instead forms two intramolecular agostic η¹ Rh···H-C interactions with the phosphine cyclohexyl groups. CH₂Cl₂ adducts formed by displacement of the η¹-alkanes in solution ( n = 5; L = NBA, COA), [ RhH(Cy₂P(CH₂)₂( CH)(CH₂)₂PCy₂)(κ¹-ClCH₂Cl)][BAr^F₄], are characterized crystallographically. Analyses via periodic DFT, QTAIM, NBO, and NCI calculations, alongside variable temperature solid-state NMR spectroscopy, provide snapshots marking the onset of Rh···alkane interactions along a C-H activation trajectory. These are negligible in [Rh(Cy₂P(CH₂)₃PCy₂)][COA⊂BAr^F₄]; in [ RhH(Cy₂P(CH₂)₂( CH)(CH₂)₂PCy₂)(η¹-COA)][BAr^F₄], σ_C-H → Rh σ-donation is supported by Rh → σ*_C-H "pregostic" donation, and in [Rh(Cy₂P(CH₂) _nPCy₂)(η²η²-NBA)][BAr^F₄] ( n = 2-4), σ-donation dominates, supported by classical Rh(dπ) → σ*_C-H π-back-donation. Dispersive interactions with the [BAr^F₄]^- anions and Cy substituents further stabilize the alkanes within the binding pocket.