Amine–Borane Dehydropolymerization Using Rh-Based Precatalysts: Resting State, Chain Control, and Efficient Polymer Synthesis

Tetramerization of BEB-Doped Phenalenyls to Obtain (BE)8-[16]Annulenes (E = N, O)

Two (BE)8-[16]annulenes were prepared and fully characterized by experimental and quantum-chemical means (1, E = N; 2, E = O). The 1,8-naphthalenediyl-bridged diborane(6) 3 served as their common starting material, which was treated with [Al(NH3)6]Cl3 to form 1 (91% yield) or with 1,8-naphthalenediboronic acid anhydride to form 2 (93% yield). As a result, the heteroannulenes 1 and 2 are supported by four aromatic "clamps" and may also be viewed as NH- or O-bridged cyclic tetramers of BNB- or BOB-doped phenalenyls. X-ray crystallography on mono-, di-, and tetraadducts 2·thf, 2·py2, and 2·py4 showed that 2 is an oligotopic Lewis acid (thf/py: tetrahydrofuran/pyridine donor). The applicability of 2 also as a Lewis basic ligand in coordination chemistry was demonstrated by the synthesis of the mononuclear Ag+ complex [Ag(py)2(2·py4)]+ and the dinuclear Pb2+ complex 6. During the assembly of 6, the rearrangement of 2 led to the formation of two (BO)9-macrocycles linked by two BOB-phenalenyls to form a nanometer-sized cage with four negatively charged, tetracoordinated B atoms. Both 1 and 2 show several redox waves in the cathodic regions of the cyclic voltammograms. An in-depth assessment of the consequences of electron injection on the aromaticity of 1 and 2 was achieved by electronic structure calculations. 1 and 2 are proposed to exhibit aromatic switching capabilities in the [16]annulene motif.

Catalyst-Free Transfer Hydrogenation from Amine-Borane Small Oligomers

Amine-borane dimers and oligomers with varied steric and electronic profiles were prepared via capping agent-controlled AA/BB polycondensations. They were used for transfer hydrogenations to aldehydes, ketones, imines as well as electron-poor alkene/alkyne moieties. The amine-borane Lewis-paired oligomers and the congested bis(amine-borane)s provided the highest yields. This was likely helped by facilitated dissociation (oligomers) or H-bond assistance. In the case of the oligomers, the second equivalent of H2 present was also engaged in the reaction. Solid-state NMR characterization provides evidence that the boron-containing materials obtained after transfer dehydrogenation are highly similar to those obtained from thermal dehydrogenation. The oligomers bridge the gap between simple amine-borane molecular reductants and the poly-amine-boranes and provide a full picture of the reactivity changes at the different scales.

Dehydropolymerization of Amine-Boranes using Bis(imino)pyridine Rhodium Pre-Catalysis: σ-Amine-Borane Complexes, Nanoparticles, and Low Residual-Metal BN-Polymers that can be Chemically Repurposed

The sigma amine-borane complexes [Rh(L1)(η2 :η2 -H3 B⋅NRH2 )][OTf] (L1=2,6-bis-[1-(2,6-diisopropylphenylimino)ethyl]pyridine, R=Me, Et, n Pr) are described, alongside [Rh(L1)(NMeH2 )][OTf]. Using R=Me as a pre-catalyst (1 mol %) the dehydropolymerization of H3 B ⋅ NMeH2 gives [H2 BNMeH]n selectively. Added NMeH2 , or the direct use of [Rh(L1)(NMeH2 )][OTf], is required for initiation of catalysis, which is suggested to operate through the formation of a neutral hydride complex, Rh(L1)H. The formation of small (1-5 nm) nanoparticles is observed at the end of catalysis, but studies are ambiguous as to whether the catalysis is solely nanoparticle promoted or if there is a molecular homogeneous component. [Rh(L1)(NMeH2 )][OTf] is shown to operate at 0.025 mol % loadings on a 2 g scale of H3 B ⋅ NMeH2 to give polyaminoborane [H2 BNMeH]n [Mn =30,900 g/mol, Ð=1.8] that can be purified to a low residual [Rh] (6 μg/g). Addition of Na[N(SiMe3 )2 ] to [H2 BNMeH]n results in selective depolymerization to form the eee-isomer of N,N,N-trimethylcyclotriborazane [H2 BNMeH]3 : the chemical repurposing of a main-group polymer.

Recent advances in catalytic pnictogen bond forming reactions via dehydrocoupling and hydrofunctionalization

An examination of several catalytic reactions among the group 15 elements is presented. The connections between the chemistry of the pnictogens can sometimes be challenging, but aspects of metal-pnictogen reactivity are the key. The connecting reactivity comes from metal-catalyzed transformations such as dehydrocoupling and hydrofunctionalization. Pivotal mechanistic insights from E-N heterodehydrocoupling have informed the development of highly active catalysts for these reactions. Metal-amido nucleophilicity is often at the core of this reactivity, which diverges from phosphine and arsine dehydrocoupling. Nucleophilicity connects to the earliest understanding of hydrophosphination catalysis, but more recent catalysts are leveraging enhanced insertion activity through photolysis. This photocatalysis extends to hydroarsination, which may also have more metal-arsenido nucleophilicity than anticipated. However, metal-catalyzed arsinidene chemistry foreshadowed related phosphinidene chemistry by years. This examination shows the potential for greater influence of individual discoveries and understanding to leverage new advances between these elements, and it also suggests that the chemistry of heavier elements may have more influence on what is possible with lighter elements.

Mechanistic insights into H3B·NMeH2 dehydrogenation by Co-based complexes: a DFT perspective

Mechanistic insights into Co-catalyzed H3B·NMeH2 dehydrogenation and polyaminoborane formation are carefully investigated using density functional theory.

Dehydropolymerization of H3B·NMeH2 Mediated by Cationic Iridium(III) Precatalysts Bearing κ3-iPr-PNRP Pincer Ligands (R = H, Me): An Unexpected Inner-Sphere Mechanism

The dehydropolymerization of H₃B·NMeH₂ to form N-methylpolyaminoborane using neutral and cationic catalysts based on the {Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)} fragment [ⁱPr-PN^HP = κ³-(CH₂CH₂PⁱPr₂)₂NH] is reported. Neutral Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ or Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₂Cl precatalysts show no, or poor and unselective, activity respectively at 298 K in 1,2-F₂C₆H₄ solution. In contrast, addition of [NMeH₃][BAr^F₄] (Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃) to Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ immediately starts catalysis, suggesting that a cationic catalytic manifold operates. Consistent with this, independently synthesized cationic precatalysts are active (tested between 0.5 and 2.0 mol % loading) producing poly(N-methylaminoborane) with M_n ∼ 40,000 g/mol, Đ ∼1.5, i.e., dihydrogen/dihydride, [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(H₂)][BAr^F₄]; σ-amine-borane [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(H₃B·NMe₃)][BAr^F₄]; and [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)(H)₂(NMeH₂)][BAr^F₄]. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations probe hydride exchange processes in two of these complexes and also show that the barrier to amine-borane dehydrogenation is lower (22.5 kcal/mol) for the cationic system compared with the neutral system (24.3 kcal/mol). The calculations show that the dehydrogenation proceeds via an inner-sphere process without metal–ligand cooperativity, and this is supported experimentally by N–Me substituted [Ir(ⁱPr-PN^MeP)(H)₂(H₃B·NMe₃)][BAr^F₄] being an active catalyst. Key to the lower barrier calculated for the cationic system is the outer-sphere coordination of an additional H₃B·NMeH₂ with the N–H group of the ligand. Experimentally, kinetic studies indicate a complex reaction manifold that shows pronounced deceleratory temporal profiles. As supported by speciation and DFT studies, a key observation is that deprotonation of [Ir(ⁱPr-N^HP)(H)₂(H₂)][BAr^F₄], formed upon amine-borane dehydrogenation, by the slow in situ formation of NMeH₂ (via B–N bond cleavage), results in the formation of essentially inactive Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃, with a coproduct of [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]⁺. While reprotonation of Ir(ⁱPr-PN^HP)H₃ results in a return to the cationic cycle, it is proposed, supported by doping experiments, that reprotonation is attenuated by entrainment of the [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]⁺/catalyst in insoluble polyaminoborane. The role of [NMeH₃]⁺/[H₂B(NMeH₂)]⁺ as chain control agents is also noted.

Frustrated Lewis Pair Chelation and Reactivity of Complexed Parent Iminoborane and Aminoborane

An intramolecular phosphine-borane frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) chelate, ⁱPr₂P(C₆H₄)BCy₂ or PB (Cy = cyclohexyl), was used to coordinate aminoborane (H₂BNH₂) and iminoborane (HBNH) units via donor-acceptor stabilization. Attempts to induce dehydrogenation from these B-N adducts with known metal catalysts (or pre-catalysts) have been unsuccessful thus far, and related observations were noted with an H₂BNH₂ complex supported by a modified FLP chelate bearing a geometrically constrained bicyclic 9-borabicyclo(3.3.1)nonane (BBN) unit. Treatment of the iminoborane adduct [PB{HBNH}] with a chlorinating agent led to ligand activation via B-C bond cleavage instead of the expected H/Cl exchange at boron to give [PB{ClBNH}]. Nucleophilic attack at the boron center in [PB{HBNH}] was observed upon addition of BnK (Bn = benzyl), yielding the amidoborate complex [PB{H(Bn)BNH}{K(THF)₂}].

Silyl-Osmium(IV)-Trihydride Complexes Stabilized by a Pincer Ether-Diphosphine: Formation and Reactions with Alkynes

Complex OsH₄{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (1) activates the Si-H bond of triethylsilane, triphenylsilane, and 1,1,1,3,5,5,5-heptamethyltrisiloxane to give the silyl-osmium(IV)-trihydride derivatives OsH₃(SiR₃){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} [SiR₃ = SiEt₃ (2), SiPh₃ (3), SiMe(OSiMe₃)₂ (4)] and H₂. The activation takes place via an unsaturated tetrahydride intermediate, resulting from the dissociation of the oxygen atom of the pincer ligand 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene (xant(PⁱPr₂)₂). This intermediate, which has been trapped to form OsH₄{κ²-P,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}(PⁱPr₃) (5), coordinates the Si-H bond of the silanes to subsequently undergo a homolytic cleavage. Kinetics of the reaction along with the observed primary isotope effect demonstrates that the Si-H rupture is the rate-determining step of the activation. Complex 2 reacts with 1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol and 1-phenyl-1-propyne. The reaction with the former affords Os{C≡CC(OH)Ph₂}₂{=C=CHC(OH)Ph₂}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (6), which catalyzes the conversion of the propargylic alcohol into (E)-2-(5,5-diphenylfuran-2(5H)-ylidene)-1,1-diphenylethan-1-ol, via (Z)-enynediol. In methanol, the hydroxyvinylidene ligand of 6 dehydrates to allenylidene, generating Os{C≡CC(OH)Ph₂}₂{=C=C=CPh₂}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (7). The reaction of 2 with 1-phenyl-1-propyne leads to OsH{κ¹-C,η²-[C₆H₄CH₂CH=CH₂]}{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (8) and PhCH₂CH=CH(SiEt₃).

C–Cl Oxidative Addition and C–C Reductive Elimination Reactions in the Context of the Rhodium-Promoted Direct Arylation

A cycle of stoichiometric elemental reactions defining the direct arylation promoted by a redox-pair Rh(I)–Rh(III) is reported. Starting from the rhodium(I)-aryl complex RhPh{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (xant(PⁱPr₂)₂ = 9,9-dimethyl-4,5-bis(diisopropylphosphino)xanthene), the reactions include C–Cl oxidative addition of organic chlorides, halide abstraction from the resulting six-coordinate rhodium(III) derivatives, C–C reductive coupling between the initial aryl ligand and the added organic group, oxidative addition of a C–H bond of a new arene, and deprotonation of the generated hydride-rhodium(III)-aryl species to form a new rhodium(I)-aryl derivative. In this context, the kinetics of the oxidative additions of 2-chloropyridine, chlorobenzene, benzyl chloride, and dichloromethane to RhPh{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} and the C–C reductive eliminations of biphenyl and benzylbenzene from [RhPh₂{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ and [RhPh(CH₂Ph){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄, respectively, have been studied. The oxidative additions generally involve the cis addition of the C–Cl bond of the organic chloride to the rhodium(I) complex, being kinetically controlled by the C–Cl bond dissociation energy; the weakest C–Cl bond is faster added. The C–C reductive elimination is kinetically governed by the dissociation energy of the formed bond. The C(sp³)–C(sp²) coupling to give benzylbenzene is faster than the C(sp²)–C(sp²) bond formation to afford biphenyl. In spite of that a most demanding orientation requirement is needed for the C(sp³)–C(sp²) coupling than for the C(sp²)–C(sp²) bond formation, the energetic effort for the pregeneration of the C(sp³)–C(sp²) bond is lower. As a result, the weakest C–C bond is formed faster.

Activation of Si–H and B–H bonds by Lewis acidic transition metals and p-block elements: same, but different

In this Perspective we discuss the ability of transition metal complexes to activate and cleave the Si–H and B–H bonds of hydrosilanes and hydroboranes (tri- and tetra-coordinated) in an electrophilic manner, avoiding the need for the metal centre to undergo two-electron processes (oxidative addition/reductive elimination). A formal polarization of E–H bonds (E = Si, B) upon their coordination to the metal centre to form σ-EH complexes (with coordination modes η¹ or η²) favors this type of bond activation that can lead to reactivities involving the formation of transient silylium and borenium/boronium cations similar to those proposed in silylation and borylation processes catalysed by boron and aluminium Lewis acids. We compare the reactivity of transition metal complexes and boron/aluminium Lewis acids through a series of catalytic reactions in which pieces of evidence suggest mechanisms involving electrophilic reaction pathways.

In this Perspective we compare the ability of transition metals and p-block Lewis acids to activate electrophilically hydrosilanes and hydroboranes. The mechanistic similarities and dissimilarities in different catalytic transformations are analyzed.

Controlled Synthesis of Well-Defined Polyaminoboranes on Scale Using a Robust and Efficient Catalyst

The air tolerant precatalyst, [Rh(L)(NBD)]Cl ([1]Cl) [L = κ³-(ⁱPr₂PCH₂CH₂)₂NH, NBD = norbornadiene], mediates the selective synthesis of N-methylpolyaminoborane, (H₂BNMeH)_n, by dehydropolymerization of H₃B·NMeH₂. Kinetic, speciation, and DFT studies show an induction period in which the active catalyst, Rh(L)H₃ (3), forms, which sits as an outer-sphere adduct 3·H₃BNMeH₂ as the resting state. At the end of catalysis, dormant Rh(L)H₂Cl (2) is formed. Reaction of 2 with H₃B·NMeH₂ returns 3, alongside the proposed formation of boronium [H₂B(NMeH₂)₂]Cl. Aided by isotopic labeling, Eyring analysis, and DFT calculations, a mechanism is proposed in which the cooperative "PNHP" ligand templates dehydrogenation, releasing H₂B═NMeH (ΔG^‡_calc = 19.6 kcal mol^-1). H₂B═NMeH is proposed to undergo rapid, low barrier, head-to-tail chain propagation for which 3 is the catalyst/initiator. A high molecular weight polymer is formed that is relatively insensitive to catalyst loading (M_n ∼71 000 g mol^-1; Đ, of ∼ 1.6). The molecular weight can be controlled using [H₂B(NMe₂H)₂]Cl as a chain transfer agent, M_n = 37 900-78 100 g mol^-1. This polymerization is suggested to arise from an ensemble of processes (catalyst speciation, dehydrogenation, propagation, chain transfer) that are geared around the concentration of H₃B·NMeH₂. TGA and DSC thermal analysis of polymer produced on scale (10 g, 0.01 mol % [1]Cl) show a processing window that allows for melt extrusion of polyaminoborane strands, as well as hot pressing, drop casting, and electrospray deposition. By variation of conditions in the latter, smooth or porous microstructured films or spherical polyaminoboranes beads (∼100 nm) result.

An Iron-Mesoionic Carbene Complex for Catalytic Intramolecular C-H Amination Utilizing Organic Azides

The synthesis of N-heterocycles is of paramount importance for the pharmaceutical industry. They are often synthesized through atom economic and environmentally unfriendly methods, generating significant waste. A less explored, but greener, alternative is the synthesis through the direct intramolecular C-H amination utilizing organic azides. Few examples exist by using this method, but many are limited due to the required use of stoichiometric amounts of Boc₂O. Herein, we report a homoleptic C,O-chelating mesoionic carbene-iron complex, which is the first iron-based complex that does not require the addition of any protecting groups for this transformation and that is active also in strong donor solvents such as THF or even DMSO. The achieved turnover number is an order of magnitude higher than any other reported catalytic system. A variety of C-H bonds were activated, including benzylic, primary, secondary, and tertiary. By following the reaction over time, we determined the presence of an initiation period. Kinetic studies showed a first-order dependence on substrate concentration and half-order dependence on catalyst concentration. Intermolecular competition reactions with deuterated substrate showed no KIE, while separate reactions with deuterium-labeled substrate resulted in a KIE of 2.0. Moreover, utilizing deuterated substrate significantly decreased the initiation period of the catalysis. Preliminary mechanistic studies suggest a unique mechanism involving a dimeric iron species as the catalyst resting state.

Ortho-aryl substituted DPEphos ligands: rhodium complexes featuring C-H anagostic interactions and B-H agostic bonds

The synthesis of new Schrock–Osborn Rh(i) pre-catalysts with ortho-substituted DPEphos ligands, [Rh(DPEphos-R)(NBD)][BAr^F₄] [R = Me, OMe, ⁱPr; Ar^F = 3,5-(CF₃)₂C₆H₃], is described. Along with the previously reported R = H variant, variable temperature ¹H NMR spectroscopic and single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies show that these all have axial (C–H)⋯Rh anagostic interactions relative to the d⁸ pseudo square planar metal centres, that also result in corresponding downfield chemical shifts. Analysis by NBO, QTAIM and NCI methods shows these to be only very weak C–H⋯Rh bonding interactions, the magnitudes of which do not correlate with the observed chemical shifts. Instead, as informed by Scherer's approach, it is the topological positioning of the C–H bond with regard to the metal centre that is important. For [Rh(DPEphos–ⁱPr)(NBD)][BAr^F₄] addition of H₂ results in a Rh(iii) ⁱPr–C–H activated product, [Rh(κ³,σ-P,O,P-DPEphos-ⁱPr′)(H)][BAr^F₄]. This undergoes H/D exchange with D₂ at the ⁱPr groups, reacts with CO or NBD to return Rh(i) products, and reaction with H₃B·NMe₃/tert-butylethene results in a dehydrogenative borylation to form a complex that shows both a non-classical B–H⋯Rh 3c-2e agostic bond and a C–H⋯Rh anagostic interaction at the same metal centre.

Rh(i) complexes of ortho-substituted DPEphos-R (R = H, Me, OMe, ⁱPr) ligands show anagostic interactions; for R =ⁱPr C–H activation/dehydrogenative borylation forms a product exhibiting both B–H/Rh 3c-2e agostic and C–H/Rh anagostic motifs.

Repercussion of a 1,3-Hydrogen Shift in a Hydride-Osmium-Allenylidene Complex

An unusual 1,3-hydrogen shift from the metal center to the C_β atom of the C₃-chain of the allenylidene ligand in a hydride-osmium(II)-allenylidene complex is the beginning of several interesting transformations in the cumulene. The hydride-osmium(II)-allenylidene complex was prepared in two steps, starting from the tetrahydride dimer [(Os(H···H){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]})₂(μ-Cl)₂][BF₄]₂ (1). Complex 1 reacts with 1,1-diphenyl-2-propyn-1-ol to give the hydride-osmium(II)-alkenylcarbyne [OsHCl(≡CCH=CPh₂){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ (2), which yields OsHCl(=C=C=CPh₂){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (3) by selective abstraction of the C_β–H hydrogen atom of the alkenylcarbyne ligand with K^tBuO. Complex 3 is metastable. According to results of DFT calculations, the migration of the hydride ligand to the C_β atom of the cumulene has an activation energy too high to occur in a concerted manner. However, the migration can be catalyzed by water, alcohols, and aldehydes. The resulting alkenylcarbyne-osmium(0) intermediate is unstable and evolves into a 7:3 mixture of the hydride-osmium(II)-indenylidene OsHCl(=C_IndPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (4) and the osmanaphthalene OsCl(C₉H₆Ph){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]} (5). Protonation of 4 with HBF₄ leads to the elongated dihydrogen complex [OsCl(η²-H₂)(=C_IndPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]BF₄ (6), while the protonation of 5 regenerates 2. In contrast to 4, complex 6 evolves to a half-sandwich indenyl derivative, [Os(η⁵-IndPh)H{κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}][BF₄]Cl (7). Phenylacetylene also provokes the 1,3-hydrogen shift in 3. However, it does not participate in the migration. In contrast to water, alcohols, and aldehydes, it stabilizes the resulting alkenylcarbyne to afford [Os(≡CCH=CPh₂)(η²-HC≡CPh){κ³-P,O,P-[xant(PⁱPr₂)₂]}]Cl (8).

Mechanistic insights into dehydrocoupling of amine boranes using dinuclear zirconocene complexes

Catalytic dehydrocoupling of H₃B·NMe₂H using Cp₂Zr(Cl)(μ-Me₃SiC₃SiMe₃)Zr(Cl)Cp₂ (1)/MeLi was studied. Spectroscopic monitoring and stoichiometric experiments show the formation and interconversion of several catalytically active Zr species.

Dehydropolymerisation of methylamine borane using highly active rhodium(iii) bis(thiophosphinite) pincer complexes: catalytic and mechanistic insights

The bis(thiophosphinite) pincer complexes [(^RPSCSP^R)Rh(py)(H)(Cl)] (^RPSCSP^R = C₆H₄–2,6-(SPR₂)₂ with R = ⁱPr, 2a and R = Ph, 2b) are highly active precatalysts for the dehydropolymerisation of methylamine borane.