X-ray-Structure-Based Identification of Compounds with Activity against Targets from Different Families and Generation of Templates for Multitarget Ligand Design

Promiscuity in drug discovery on the verge of the structural revolution: recent advances and future chances

INTRODUCTION

Promiscuity denotes the ability of ligands and targets to specifically interact with multiple binding partners. Despite negative aspects like side effects, promiscuity is receiving increasing attention in drug discovery as it can enhance drug efficacy and provides a molecular basis for drug repositioning. The three-dimensional structure of ligand-target complexes delivers exclusive insights into the molecular mechanisms of promiscuity and structure-based methods enable the identification of promiscuous interactions. With the recent breakthrough in protein structure prediction, novel possibilities open up to reveal unknown connections in ligand-target interaction networks.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights the significance of structure in the identification and characterization of promiscuity and evaluates the potential of protein structure prediction to advance our knowledge of drug-target interaction networks. It discusses the definition and relevance of promiscuity in drug discovery and explores different approaches to detecting promiscuous ligands and targets.

EXPERT OPINION

Examination of structural data is essential for understanding and quantifying promiscuity. The recent advancements in structure prediction have resulted in an abundance of targets that are well-suited for structure-based methods like docking. In silico approaches may eventually completely transform our understanding of drug-target networks by complementing the millions of predicted protein structures with billions of predicted drug-target interactions.

Advances in Computational Polypharmacology

In drug discovery, polypharmacology encompasses the use of small molecules with defined multi-target activity and in vivo effects resulting from multi-target engagement. Multi-target compounds are often efficacious in the treatment of complex diseases involving target and pathway networks, but might also elicit unwanted side effects. Computational approaches such as target prediction or multi-target ligand design have been used to support polypharmacological drug discovery. In addition to efforts directed at the identification or design of new multi-target compounds, other computational investigations have aimed to differentiate such compounds from potential false-positives or explore the molecular basis of multi-target activities. Herein, a concise overview of the field is provided and recent advances in computational polypharmacology through machine learning are discussed.

Polyphenolic promiscuity, inflammation-coupled selectivity: Whether PAINs filters mask an antiviral asset

The Covid-19 pandemic has elicited much laboratory and clinical research attention on vaccines, mAbs, and certain small-molecule antivirals against SARS-CoV-2 infection. By contrast, there has been comparatively little attention on plant-derived compounds, especially those that are understood to be safely ingested at common doses and are frequently consumed in the diet in herbs, spices, fruits and vegetables. Examining plant secondary metabolites, we review recent elucidations into the pharmacological activity of flavonoids and other polyphenolic compounds and also survey their putative frequent-hitter behavior. Polyphenols, like many drugs, are glucuronidated post-ingestion. In an inflammatory milieu such as infection, a reversion back to the active aglycone by the release of β-glucuronidase from neutrophils and macrophages allows cellular entry of the aglycone. In the context of viral infection, virions and intracellular virus particles may be exposed to promiscuous binding by the polyphenol aglycones resulting in viral inhibition. As the mechanism's scope would apply to the diverse range of virus species that elicit inflammation in infected hosts, we highlight pre-clinical studies of polyphenol aglycones, such as luteolin, isoginkgetin, quercetin, quercetagetin, baicalein, curcumin, fisetin and hesperetin that reduce virion replication spanning multiple distinct virus genera. It is hoped that greater awareness of the potential spatial selectivity of polyphenolic activation to sites of pathogenic infection will spur renewed research and clinical attention for natural products antiviral assaying and trialing over a wide array of infectious viral diseases.

Gains from no real PAINS: Where 'Fair Trial Strategy' stands in the development of multi-target ligands

Compounds that selectively modulate multiple targets can provide clinical benefits and are an alternative to traditional highly selective agents for unique targets. High-throughput screening (HTS) for multitarget-directed ligands (MTDLs) using approved drugs, and fragment-based drug design has become a regular strategy to achieve an ideal multitarget combination. However, the unexpected presence of pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS) suspects in the development of MTDLs frequently results in nonspecific interactions or other undesirable effects leading to artefacts or false-positive data of biological assays. Publicly available filters can help to identify PAINS suspects; however, these filters cannot comprehensively conclude whether these suspects are "bad" or innocent. Additionally, these in silico approaches may inappropriately label a ligand as PAINS. More than 80% of the initial hits can be identified as PAINS by the filters if appropriate biochemical tests are not used resulting in false positive data that are unacceptable for medicinal chemists in manuscript peer review and future studies. Therefore, extensive offline experiments should be used after online filtering to discriminate "bad" PAINS and avoid incorrect evaluation of good scaffolds. We suggest that the use of "Fair Trial Strategy" to identify interesting molecules in PAINS suspects to provide certain structure‒function insight in MTDL development.

Introducing the metacore concept for multi-target ligand design

In this work, we introduce the concept of "metacores" (MCs) for the organization of analog series (ASs) and multi-target (MT) ligand design. Generating compounds that are active against distantly related or unrelated targets is a central task in polypharmacology-oriented drug discovery. MCs are obtained by two-stage extraction of structural cores from ASs. The methodology is chemically intuitive and generally applicable. Each MC represents a set of related ASs and a template for the generation of new structures. We have systematically identified ASs that exclusively consisted of analogs with MT activity and determined their target profiles. From these ASs, a large set of 317 structurally diverse MCs was extracted, 127 of which were associated with different target families. The newly generated MCs were characterized and further prioritized on the basis of AS, compound, and target coverage. The analysis indicated that 260 MCs were pharmaceutically relevant. These MCs and the compound and target information they capture are made freely available for medicinal chemistry applications.

Multiple Target Drug Design Using LigBuilder 3

Designing drugs that directly interact with multiple targets is a promising approach for treating complicated diseases. In order to successfully bind to multiple targets of different families and achieve the desired ligand efficiency, multi-target-directed ligands (MTDLs) require a higher level of diversity and complexity. De novo design strategies for creating more diverse chemical entities with desired properties may present an improved approach for developing MTDLs. In this chapter, we describe a computational protocol for developing MTDLs using the first reported multi-target de novo program, LigBuilder 3, which combines a binding site prediction module with de novo drug design and optimization modules. As an illustration of each detailed procedure, we design dual-functional compounds of two well-characterized virus enzymes, HIV protease and reverse transcriptase (PR and RT, respectively), using fragments extracted from known inhibitors. LigBuilder 3 is accessible at http://www.pkumdl.cn/ligbuilder3/ .

High Throughput Screen Identifies Small Molecule Effectors That Modulate Thin Filament Activation in Cardiac Muscle

Current therapeutic interventions for both heart disease and heart failure are largely insufficient and associated with undesired side effects. Biomedical research has emphasized the role of sarcomeric protein function for the normal performance and energy efficiency of the heart, suggesting that directly targeting the contractile myofilaments themselves using small molecule effectors has therapeutic potential and will likely result in greater drug efficacy and selectivity. In this study, we developed a robust and highly reproducible fluorescence polarization-based high throughput screening (HTS) assay that directly targets the calcium-dependent interaction between cardiac troponin C (cTnC) and the switch region of cardiac troponin I (cTnI_SP), with the aim of identifying small molecule effectors of the cardiac thin filament activation pathway. We screened a commercially available small molecule library and identified several hit compounds with both inhibitory and activating effects. We used a range of biophysical and biochemical methods to characterize hit compounds and identified fingolimod, a sphingosin-1-phosphate receptor modulator, as a new troponin-based small molecule effector. Fingolimod decreased the ATPase activity and calcium sensitivity of demembranated cardiac muscle fibers in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that the compound acts as a calcium desensitizer. We investigated fingolimod's mechanism of action using a combination of computational studies, biophysical methods, and synthetic chemistry, showing that fingolimod bound to cTnC repels cTnI_SP via mainly electrostatic repulsion of its positively charged tail. These results suggest that fingolimod is a potential new lead compound/scaffold for the development of troponin-directed heart failure therapeutics.

Analysis of Biological Screening Compounds with Single- or Multi-Target Activity via Diagnostic Machine Learning

Predicting compounds with single- and multi-target activity and exploring origins of compound specificity and promiscuity is of high interest for chemical biology and drug discovery. We present a large-scale analysis of compound promiscuity including two major components. First, high-confidence datasets of compounds with multi- and corresponding single-target activity were extracted from biological screening data. Positive and negative assay results were taken into account and data completeness was ensured. Second, these datasets were investigated using diagnostic machine learning to systematically distinguish between compounds with multi- and single-target activity. Models built on the basis of chemical structure consistently produced meaningful predictions. These findings provided evidence for the presence of structural features differentiating promiscuous and non-promiscuous compounds. Machine learning under varying conditions using modified datasets revealed a strong influence of nearest neighbor relationship on the predictions. Many multi-target compounds were found to be more similar to other multi-target compounds than single-target compounds and vice versa, which resulted in consistently accurate predictions. The results of our study confirm the presence of structural relationships that differentiate promiscuous and non-promiscuous compounds.

X-ray Structure-Based Chemoinformatic Analysis Identifies Promiscuous Ligands Binding to Proteins from Different Classes with Varying Shapes

(1) Background: Compounds with multitarget activity are of interest in basic research to explore molecular foundations of promiscuous binding and in drug discovery as agents eliciting polypharmacological effects. Our study has aimed to systematically identify compounds that form complexes with proteins from distinct classes and compare their bioactive conformations and molecular properties. (2) Methods: A large-scale computational investigation was carried out that combined the analysis of complex X-ray structures, ligand binding modes, compound activity data, and various molecular properties. (3) Results: A total of 515 ligands with multitarget activity were identified that included 70 organic compounds binding to proteins from different classes. These multiclass ligands (MCLs) were often flexible and surprisingly hydrophilic. Moreover, they displayed a wide spectrum of binding modes. In different target structure environments, binding shapes of MCLs were often similar, but also distinct. (4) Conclusions: Combined structural and activity data analysis identified compounds with activity against proteins with distinct structures and functions. MCLs were found to have greatly varying shape similarity when binding to different protein classes. Hence, there were no apparent canonical binding shapes indicating multitarget activity. Rather, conformational versatility characterized MCL binding.

Biological Activity Profiles of Multitarget Ligands from X-ray Structures

In pharmaceutical research, compounds with multitarget activity receive increasing attention. Such promiscuous chemical entities are prime candidates for polypharmacology, but also prone to causing undesired side effects. In addition, understanding the molecular basis and magnitude of multitarget activity is a stimulating topic for exploratory research. Computationally, compound promiscuity can be estimated through large-scale analysis of activity data. To these ends, it is critically important to take data confidence criteria and data consistency across different sources into consideration. Especially the consistency aspect has thus far only been little investigated. Therefore, we have systematically determined activity annotations and profiles of known multitarget ligands (MTLs) on the basis of activity data from different sources. All MTLs used were confirmed by X-ray crystallography of complexes with multiple targets. One of the key questions underlying our analysis has been how MTLs act in biological screens. The results of our analysis revealed significant variations of MTL activity profiles originating from different data sources. Such variations must be carefully considered in promiscuity analysis. Our study raises awareness of these issues and provides guidance for large-scale activity data analysis.

Identification of Target Associations for Polypharmacology from Analysis of Crystallographic Ligands of the Protein Data Bank

The design of a chemical entity that potently and selectively binds to a biological target of therapeutic relevance has dominated the scene of drug discovery so far. However, recent findings suggest that multitarget ligands may be endowed with superior efficacy and be less prone to drug resistance. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) provides experimentally validated structural information about targets and bound ligands. Therefore, it represents a valuable source of information to help identifying active sites, understanding pharmacophore requirements, designing novel ligands, and inferring structure-activity relationships. In this study, we performed a large-scale analysis of the PDB by integrating different ligand-based and structure-based approaches, with the aim of identifying promising target associations for polypharmacology based on reported crystal structure information. First, the 2D and 3D similarity profiles of the crystallographic ligands were evaluated using different ligand-based methods. Then, activity data of pairs of similar ligands binding to different targets were inspected by comparing structural information with bioactivity annotations reported in the ChEMBL, BindingDB, BindingMOAD, and PDBbind databases. Afterward, extensive docking screenings of ligands in the identified cross-targets were made in order to validate and refine the ligand-based results. Finally, the therapeutic relevance of the identified target combinations for polypharmacology was evaluated from comparison with information on therapeutic targets reported in the Therapeutic Target Database (TTD). The results led to the identification of several target associations with high therapeutic potential for polypharmacology.

Identifying Promiscuous Compounds with Activity against Different Target Classes

Compounds with multitarget activity are of high interest for polypharmacological drug discovery. Such promiscuous compounds might be active against closely related target proteins from the same family or against distantly related or unrelated targets. Compounds with activity against distinct targets are not only of interest for polypharmacology but also to better understand how small molecules might form specific interactions in different binding site environments. We have aimed to identify compounds with activity against drug targets from different classes. To these ends, a systematic analysis of public biological screening data was carried out. Care was taken to exclude compounds from further consideration that were prone to experimental artifacts and false positive activity readouts. Extensively assayed compounds were identified and found to contain molecules that were consistently inactive in all assays, active against a single target, or promiscuous. The latter included more than 1000 compounds that were active against 10 or more targets from different classes. These multiclass ligands were further analyzed and exemplary compounds were found in X-ray structures of complexes with distinct targets. Our collection of multiclass ligands should be of interest for pharmaceutical applications and further exploration of binding characteristics at the molecular level. Therefore, these highly promiscuous compounds are made publicly available.

Promiscuous Ligands from Experimentally Determined Structures, Binding Conformations, and Protein Family-Dependent Interaction Hotspots

Compound promiscuity is often attributed to nonspecific binding or assay artifacts. On the other hand, it is well-known that many pharmaceutically relevant compounds are capable of engaging multiple targets in vivo, giving rise to polypharmacology. To explore and better understand promiscuous binding characteristics of small molecules, we have searched X-ray structures (and very few qualifying solution structures) for ligands that bind to multiple distantly related or unrelated target proteins. Experimental structures of a given ligand bound to different targets represent high-confidence data for exploring promiscuous binding events. A total of 192 ligands were identified that formed crystallographic complexes with proteins from different families and for which activity data were available. These "multifamily" compounds included endogenous ligands and were often more polar than other bound compounds and active in the submicromolar range. Unexpectedly, many promiscuous ligands displayed conserved or similar binding conformations in different active sites. Others were found to conformationally adjust to binding sites of different architectures. A comprehensive analysis of ligand-target interactions revealed that multifamily ligands frequently formed different interaction hotspots in binding sites, even if their bound conformations were similar, thus providing a rationale for promiscuous binding events at the molecular level of detail. As a part of this work, all multifamily ligands we have identified and associated activity data are made freely available.

Selection of protein conformations for structure-based polypharmacology studies

Several drugs exert their therapeutic effect through the modulation of multiple targets. Structure-based approaches hold great promise for identifying compounds with the desired polypharmacological profiles. These methods use knowledge of the protein binding sites to identify stereoelectronically complementary ligands. The selection of the most suitable protein conformations to be used in the design process is vital, especially for multitarget drug design in which the same ligand has to be accommodated in multiple binding pockets. Herein, we focus on currently available techniques for the selection of the most suitable protein conformations for multitarget drug design, compare the potential advantages and limitations of each method, and comment on how their combination could help in polypharmacology drug design.