Atomic Determinants for Aminoacylation of RNA Minihelices and Relationship to Genetic Code

Primordial aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases preferred minihelices to full-length tRNA

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS) and tRNAs translate the genetic code in all living cells. Little is known about how their molecular ancestors began to enforce the coding rules for the expression of their own genes. Schimmel et al. proposed in 1993 that AARS catalytic domains began by reading an 'operational' code in the acceptor stems of tRNA minihelices. We show here that the enzymology of an AARS urzyme•TΨC-minihelix cognate pair is a rich in vitro realization of that idea. The TΨC-minihelixLeu is a very poor substrate for full-length Leucyl-tRNA synthetase. It is a superior RNA substrate for the corresponding urzyme, LeuAC. LeuAC active-site mutations shift the choice of both amino acid and RNA substrates. AARS urzyme•minihelix cognate pairs are thus small, pliant models for the ancestral decoding hardware. They are thus an ideal platform for detailed experimental study of the operational RNA code.

Coding triplets in the tRNA acceptor-TΨC arm and their role in present and past tRNA recognition

The mechanism and evolution of the recognition scheme between key components of the translation system, that is, tRNAs, synthetases, and elongation factors, are fundamental issues in understanding the translation of genetic information into proteins. Statistical analysis of bacterial tRNA sequences reveals that for six amino acids, a string of 10 nucleotides preceding the tRNA 3' end carries cognate coding triplets to nearly full extent. The triplets conserved in positions 63-67 are implicated in the recognition by the elongation factor EF-Tu, and those conserved in positions 68-72, in the identification of cognate tRNAs, and their derived minihelices by class IIa synthetases. These coding triplets are suggested to have primordial origin, being engaged in aminoacylation of prebiotic tRNAs and in the establishment of the canonical codon set.

On the origin of degeneracy in the genetic code

The degeneracy of amino acid coding is one of the most crucial and enigmatic aspects of the genetic code. Different theories about the origin of the genetic code have been developed. However, to date, there is no comprehensive hypothesis on the mechanism that might have generated the degeneracy as we observe it. Here, we provide a new theory that explains the origin of the degeneracy based only on symmetry principles. The approach allows one to describe exactly the degeneracy of the early code (progenitor of the genetic code of LUCA, the last universal common ancestor) which is hypothesized to have the same degeneracy as the present vertebrate mitochondrial genetic code. The theory is based upon the tessera code, that fits as the progenitor of the early code. Moreover, we describe in detail the possible evolutionary transitions implied by our theory. The approach is supported by a unified mathematical framework that accounts for the degeneracy properties of both nuclear and mitochondrial genetic codes. Our work provides a new perspective to the understanding of the origin of the genetic code and the roles of symmetry principles in the organization of genetic information.

When transfer-messenger RNA scars reveal its ancient origins

In bacteria, trans-translation is the primary quality control mechanism for rescuing ribosomes arrested during translation. This key process is universally conserved and plays a crucial role in the viability and virulence of all bacteria. It is performed by transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA) and its protein partner small protein B (SmpB). Here, we show that tmRNA is a key molecule that could have given birth to modern protein synthesis. The traces of an ancient RNA world persist in the structure of modern tmRNA, suggesting its old origins. Therefore, since it has both tRNA and mRNA functions, tmRNA could be the missing link that allowed modern genetic code to be read by the ribosome.

Hypothesis: Spontaneous Advent of the Prebiotic Translation System via the Accumulation of L-Shaped RNA Elements

The feasibility of self-assembly of a translation system from prebiotic random RNA chains is a question that is central to the ability to conceive life emerging by natural processes. The spontaneous materialization of a translation system would have required the autonomous formation of proto-transfer RNA (tRNA) and proto-ribosome molecules that are indispensable for translating an RNA chain into a polypeptide. Currently, the vestiges of a non-coded proto-ribosome, which could have only catalyzed the formation of a peptide bond between random amino acids, is consensually localized in the region encircling the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosomal large subunit. The work presented here suggests, based on high resolution structures of ribosomes complexed with messenger RNA (mRNA) and tRNAs, that three types of L-shaped RNA building blocks derived from the modern ribosome, alongside with an L-shaped proto-tRNA, each composed of about 70-mer, could have randomly occurred in the prebiotic world and combined to form a simple translation system. The model of the initial coded proto-ribosome, which includes the active sites of both ribosomal subunits, together with a bridging element, incorporates less than 6% of the current prokaryotic rRNA, yet it integrates all of the ribosomal components that are vital for synthesizing the earliest coded polypeptides.

The emerging complexity of the tRNA world: mammalian tRNAs beyond protein synthesis

The discovery of the genetic code and tRNAs as decoders of the code transformed life science. However, after establishing the role of tRNAs in protein synthesis, the field moved to other parts of the RNA world. Now, tRNA research is blooming again, with demonstration of the involvement of tRNAs in various other pathways beyond translation and in adapting translation to environmental cues. These roles are linked to the presence of tRNA sequence variants known as isoacceptors and isodecoders, various tRNA base modifications, the versatility of protein binding partners and tRNA fragmentation events, all of which collectively create an incalculable complexity. This complexity provides a vast repertoire of tRNA species that can serve various functions in cellular homeostasis and in adaptation of cellular functions to changing environments, and it likely arose from the fundamental role of RNAs in early evolution.

Role of D-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase beyond chiral proofreading as a cellular defense against glycine mischarging by AlaRS

Strict L-chiral rejection through Gly-cisPro motif during chiral proofreading underlies the inability of D-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase (DTD) to discriminate between D-amino acids and achiral glycine. The consequent Gly-tRNA^Gly ‘misediting paradox’ is resolved by EF-Tu in the cell. Here, we show that DTD’s active site architecture can efficiently edit mischarged Gly-tRNA^Ala species four orders of magnitude more efficiently than even AlaRS, the only ubiquitous cellular checkpoint known for clearing the error. Also, DTD knockout in AlaRS editing-defective background causes pronounced toxicity in Escherichia coli even at low-glycine levels which is alleviated by alanine supplementation. We further demonstrate that DTD positively selects the universally invariant tRNA^Ala-specific G3•U70. Moreover, DTD’s activity on non-cognate Gly-tRNA^Ala is conserved across all bacteria and eukaryotes, suggesting DTD’s key cellular role as a glycine deacylator. Our study thus reveals a hitherto unknown function of DTD in cracking the universal mechanistic dilemma encountered by AlaRS, and its physiological importance.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24001.001

Proteins are made up of many different building blocks called amino acids, which are linked together in chains. The exact order of amino acids in a protein chain is important for the protein to work properly. When a cell makes proteins, molecules known as transfer ribonucleic acids (or tRNAs for short) bind to specific amino acids to guide them to the growing protein chains in the correct order.

Most amino acids – except one called glycine – have two forms that are mirror images of one another, known as left-handed (L-amino acids) and right-handed (D-amino acids). However, only L-amino acids and glycine are used to make proteins. This is because of the presence of multiple quality control checkpoints in the cell that prevent D-amino acids from being involved. One such checkpoint is an enzyme called D-amino acid deacylase (DTD), which removes D-amino acids that are attached to tRNAs.

Other enzymes are responsible for linking a particular amino acid to its correct tRNA. Along with mistaking D-amino acids for L-amino acids, these enzymes can also make errors when they have to distinguish between amino acids that are similar in shape and size. For example, the enzyme that attaches L-alanine to its tRNA can also mistakenly attach larger L-serine or smaller glycine to it instead. Previous research has shown that attaching L-serine to this tRNA can lead to neurodegeneration in mice, whereas attaching glycine does not seem to cause any harm. It is not clear why this is the case.

Pawar et al. investigated how incorrectly attaching glycine or L-serine to the tRNA that usually binds to L-alanine affects a bacterium called Escherichia coli. The experiments show that, if the mistake is not corrected, glycine can be just as harmful to the cells as L-serine. The reason that glycine appears to be less of a problem is that the DTD enzyme is able to remove glycine, but not L-serine, from the tRNA. Further experiments show that DTD can play a similar role in a variety of organisms from bacteria to mammals.

The findings of Pawar et al. extend the role of DTD beyond preventing D-amino acids from being incorporated into proteins. The next step is to understand the role of this enzyme in humans and other multicellular organisms, especially in the context of nerve cells, where it is present at high levels.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.24001.002

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are modular enzymes globally conserved in the three kingdoms of life. All catalyze the same two-step reaction, i.e., the attachment of a proteinogenic amino acid on their cognate tRNAs, thereby mediating the correct expression of the genetic code. In addition, some aaRSs acquired other functions beyond this key role in translation. Genomics and X-ray crystallography have revealed great structural diversity in aaRSs (e.g., in oligomery and modularity, in ranking into two distinct groups each subdivided in 3 subgroups, by additional domains appended on the catalytic modules). AaRSs show huge structural plasticity related to function and limited idiosyncrasies that are kingdom or even species specific (e.g., the presence in many Bacteria of non discriminating aaRSs compensating for the absence of one or two specific aaRSs, notably AsnRS and/or GlnRS). Diversity, as well, occurs in the mechanisms of aaRS gene regulation that are not conserved in evolution, notably between distant groups such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria. The review focuses on bacterial aaRSs (and their paralogs) and covers their structure, function, regulation, and evolution. Structure/function relationships are emphasized, notably the enzymology of tRNA aminoacylation and the editing mechanisms for correction of activation and charging errors. The huge amount of genomic and structural data that accumulated in last two decades is reviewed, showing how the field moved from essentially reductionist biology towards more global and integrated approaches. Likewise, the alternative functions of aaRSs and those of aaRS paralogs (e.g., during cell wall biogenesis and other metabolic processes in or outside protein synthesis) are reviewed. Since aaRS phylogenies present promiscuous bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal features, similarities and differences in the properties of aaRSs from the three kingdoms of life are pinpointed throughout the review and distinctive characteristics of bacterium-like synthetases from organelles are outlined.

The place of RNA in the origin and early evolution of the genetic machinery

The extant genetic machinery revolves around three interrelated polymers: RNA, DNA and proteins. Two evolutionary views approach this vital connection from opposite perspectives. The RNA World theory posits that life began in a cold prebiotic broth of monomers with the de novo emergence of replicating RNA as functionally self-contained polymer and that subsequent evolution is characterized by RNA → DNA memory takeover and ribozyme → enzyme catalyst takeover. The FeS World theory posits that life began as an autotrophic metabolism in hot volcanic-hydrothermal fluids and evolved with organic products turning into ligands for transition metal catalysts thereby eliciting feedback and feed-forward effects. In this latter context it is posited that the three polymers of the genetic machinery essentially coevolved from monomers through oligomers to polymers, operating functionally first as ligands for ligand-accelerated transition metal catalysis with later addition of base stacking and base pairing, whereby the functional dichotomy between hereditary DNA with stability on geologic time scales and transient, catalytic RNA with stability on metabolic time scales existed since the dawn of the genetic machinery. Both approaches are assessed comparatively for chemical soundness.

Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases in the Bacterial World

Aminoacyl-tRNAsynthetases (aaRSs) are modular enzymesglobally conserved in the three kingdoms of life. All catalyze the same two-step reaction, i.e., the attachment of a proteinogenic amino acid on their cognate tRNAs, thereby mediating the correct expression of the genetic code. In addition, some aaRSs acquired other functions beyond this key role in translation.Genomics and X-ray crystallography have revealed great structural diversity in aaRSs (e.g.,in oligomery and modularity, in ranking into two distinct groups each subdivided in 3 subgroups, by additional domains appended on the catalytic modules). AaRSs show hugestructural plasticity related to function andlimited idiosyncrasies that are kingdom or even speciesspecific (e.g.,the presence in many Bacteria of non discriminating aaRSs compensating for the absence of one or two specific aaRSs, notably AsnRS and/or GlnRS).Diversity, as well, occurs in the mechanisms of aaRS gene regulation that are not conserved in evolution, notably betweendistant groups such as Gram-positive and Gram-negative Bacteria.Thereview focuses on bacterial aaRSs (and their paralogs) and covers their structure, function, regulation,and evolution. Structure/function relationships are emphasized, notably the enzymology of tRNA aminoacylation and the editing mechanisms for correction of activation and charging errors. The huge amount of genomic and structural data that accumulatedin last two decades is reviewed,showing how thefield moved from essentially reductionist biologytowards more global and integrated approaches. Likewise, the alternative functions of aaRSs and those of aaRSparalogs (e.g., during cellwall biogenesis and other metabolic processes in or outside protein synthesis) are reviewed. Since aaRS phylogenies present promiscuous bacterial, archaeal, and eukaryal features, similarities and differences in the properties of aaRSs from the three kingdoms of life are pinpointedthroughout the reviewand distinctive characteristics of bacterium-like synthetases from organelles are outlined.

Ribosome evolution: emergence of peptide synthesis machinery

Proteins, the main players in current biological systems, are produced on ribosomes by sequential amide bond (peptide bond) formations between amino-acid-bearing tRNAs. The ribosome is an exquisite super-complex of RNA-proteins, containing more than 50 proteins and at least 3 kinds of RNAs. The combination of a variety of side chains of amino acids (typically 20 kinds with some exceptions) confers proteins with extraordinary structure and functions. The origin of peptide bond formation and the ribosome is crucial to the understanding of life itself. In this article, a possible evolutionary pathway to peptide bond formation machinery (proto-ribosome) will be discussed, with a special focus on the RNA minihelix (primordial form of modern tRNA) as a starting molecule. Combining the present data with recent experimental data, we can infer that the peptidyl transferase center (PTC) evolved from a primitive system in the RNA world comprising tRNA-like molecules formed by duplication of minihelix-like small RNA.

Mistranslation and its control by tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases are ancient proteins that interpret the genetic material in all life forms. They are thought to have appeared during the transition from the RNA world to the theatre of proteins. During translation, they establish the rules of the genetic code, whereby each amino acid is attached to a tRNA that is cognate to the amino acid. Mistranslation occurs when an amino acid is attached to the wrong tRNA and subsequently is misplaced in a nascent protein. Mistranslation can be toxic to bacteria and mammalian cells, and can lead to heritable mutations. The great challenge for nature appears to be serine-for-alanine mistranslation, where even small amounts of this mistranslation cause severe neuropathologies in the mouse. To minimize serine-for-alanine mistranslation, powerful selective pressures developed to prevent mistranslation through a special editing activity imbedded within alanyl-tRNA synthetases (AlaRSs). However, serine-for-alanine mistranslation is so challenging that a separate, genome-encoded fragment of the editing domain of AlaRS is distributed throughout the Tree of Life to redundantly prevent serine-to-alanine mistranslation. Detailed X-ray structural and functional analysis shed light on why serine-for-alanine mistranslation is a universal problem, and on the selective pressures that engendered the appearance of AlaXps at the base of the Tree of Life.

Revisiting the operational RNA code for amino acids: Ensemble attributes and their implications

It has been suggested that tRNA acceptor stems specify an operational RNA code for amino acids. In the last 20 years several attributes of the putative code have been elucidated for a small number of model organisms. To gain insight about the ensemble attributes of the code, we analyzed 4925 tRNA sequences from 102 bacterial and 21 archaeal species. Here, we used a classification and regression tree (CART) methodology, and we found that the degrees of degeneracy or specificity of the RNA codes in both Archaea and Bacteria differ from those of the genetic code. We found instances of taxon-specific alternative codes, i.e., identical acceptor stem determinants encrypting different amino acids in different species, as well as instances of ambiguity, i.e., identical acceptor stem determinants encrypting two or more amino acids in the same species. When partitioning the data by class of synthetase, the degree of code ambiguity was significantly reduced. In cryptographic terms, a plausible interpretation of this result is that the class distinction in synthetases is an essential part of the decryption rules for resolving the subset of RNA code ambiguities enciphered by identical acceptor stem determinants of tRNAs acylated by enzymes belonging to the two classes. In evolutionary terms, our findings lend support to the notion that in the pre-DNA world, interactions between tRNA acceptor stems and synthetases formed the basis for the distinction between the two classes; hence, ambiguities in the ancient RNA code were pivotal for the fixation of these enzymes in the genomes of ancestral prokaryotes.

Toward a more complete view of tRNA biology

Transfer RNAs are ancient molecules present in all domains of life. In addition to translating the genetic code into protein and defining the second genetic code together with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, tRNAs act in many other cellular functions. Robust phenomenological observations on the role of tRNAs in translation, together with massive sequence and crystallographic data, have led to a deeper physicochemical understanding of tRNA architecture, dynamics and identity. In vitro studies complemented by cell biology data already indicate how tRNA behaves in cellular environments, in particular in higher Eukarya. From an opposite approach, reverse evolution considerations suggest how tRNAs emerged as simplified structures from the RNA world. This perspective discusses what basic questions remain unanswered, how these answers can be obtained and how a more rational understanding of the function and dysfunction of tRNA can have applications in medicine and biotechnology.

A minimal TrpRS catalytic domain supports sense/antisense ancestry of class I and II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The emergence of polypeptide catalysts for amino acid activation, the slowest step in protein synthesis, poses a significant puzzle associated with the origin of biology. This problem is compounded as the 20 contemporary aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases belong to two quite distinct families. We describe here the use of protein design to show experimentally that a minimal class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase active site might have functioned in the distant past. We deleted the anticodon binding domain from tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetase and fused the discontinuous segments comprising its active site. The resulting 130 residue minimal catalytic domain activates tryptophan. This residual catalytic activity constitutes the first experimental evidence that the conserved class I signature sequences, HIGH and KMSKS, might have arisen in-frame, opposite motifs 2 and 1 from class II, as complementary sense and antisense strands of the same ancestral gene.

Alanyl-tRNA synthetase crystal structure and design for acceptor-stem recognition

Early work on aminoacylation of alanine-specific tRNA (tRNA(Ala)) by alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AlaRS) gave rise to the concept of an early "second genetic code" imbedded in the acceptor stems of tRNAs. A single conserved and position-specific G:U base pair in the tRNA acceptor stem is the key identity determinant. Further understanding has been limited due to lack of a crystal structure of the enzyme. We determined a 2.14 A crystal structure of the 453 amino acid catalytic fragment of Aquifex aeolicus AlaRS. It contains the catalytic domain characteristic of class II synthetases, a helical domain with a hairpin motif critical for acceptor-stem recognition, and a C-terminal domain of a mixed alpha/beta fold. Docking of tRNA(Ala) on AlaRS shows critical contacts with the three domains, consistent with previous mutagenesis and functional data. It also suggests conformational flexibility within the C domain, which might allow for the positional variation of the key G:U base pair seen in some tRNA(Ala)s.

Structure-specific tRNA determinants for editing a mischarged amino acid

Alanyl-tRNA synthetase efficiently aminoacylates tRNAAla and an RNA minihelix that comprises just one domain of the two-domain L-shaped tRNA structure. It also clears mischarged tRNAAla using a specialized domain in its C-terminal half. In contrast to full-length tRNAAla, minihelixAla was robustly mischarged and could not be edited. Addition in trans of the missing anticodon-containing domain did not activate editing of mischarged minihelixAla. To understand these differences between minihelixAla and tRNAAla, several chimeric full tRNAs were constructed. These had the acceptor stem of a non-cognate tRNA replaced with the stem of tRNAAla. The chimeric tRNAs collectively introduced multiple sequence changes in all parts but the acceptor stem. However, although the acceptor stem in isolation (as the minihelix) lacked determinants for editing, alanyl-tRNA synthetase effectively cleared a mischarged amino acid from each chimeric tRNA. Thus, a covalently continuous two-domain structure per se, not sequence, is a major determinant for clearance of errors of aminoacylation by alanyl-tRNA synthetase. Because errors of aminoacylation are known to be deleterious to cell growth, structure-specific determinants constitute a powerful selective pressure to retain the format of the two-domain L-shaped tRNA.

Peptide synthesis with a template-like RNA guide and aminoacyl phosphate adaptors

The genetic code is thought to have developed from an early system of RNA-dependent peptide synthesis. To investigate one kind of template-like peptide synthesis that might emerge from an RNA world, we constructed highly reactive aminoacyl phosphate oligonucleotides as adaptors that bound to RNA guide sequences. The reactive aminoacyl groups mimic a chemistry found in modern protein biosynthesis. Guide sequence interactions with adaptors were borrowed in part from universal contacts seen between tRNAs and rRNA. With these constructions, di- and tripeptides formed in a single guide sequence-dependent reaction. The order of amino acids was not random but directional in a way consistent with substrate reactivities. No ribosomes or ribozymes were required. Thus, aminoacyl phosphate adaptors and RNA guides could, in principle, have been intermediates in the transition from the RNA world to modern template-dependent protein synthesis.

RNA recognition by designed peptide fusion creates "artificial" tRNA synthetase

The genetic code was established through aminoacylations of RNA substrates that emerged as tRNAs. The 20 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (one for each amino acid) are ancient proteins, the active-site domain of which catalyzes formation of an aminoacyl adenylate that subsequently reacts with the 3' end of bound tRNA. Binding of tRNA depends on idiosyncratic (to the particular synthetase) domains and motifs that are fused to or inserted into the conserved active-site domain. Here we take the domain for synthesis of alanyl adenylate and fuse it to "artificial" peptide sequences (28 aa) that were shown previously to bind to the acceptor arm of tRNAAla. Certain fusions confer aminoacylation activity on tRNAAla and on hairpin microhelices modeled after its acceptor stem. Aminoacylation was sensitive to the presence of a specific G:U base pair known to be a major determinant of tRNAAla identity. Aminoacylation efficiency and specificity also depended on the specific peptide sequence. The results demonstrate that barriers to RNA-specific aminoacylations are low and can be achieved by relatively simple peptide fusions. They also suggest a paradigm for rationally designed specific aminoacylations based on peptide fusions.

Manipulation of tRNA properties by structure-based and combinatorial in vitro approaches

The wide knowledge accumulated over the years on the structure and function of transfer RNAs (tRNAs) has allowed molecular biologists to decipher the rules underlying the function and the architecture of these molecules. These rules will be discussed and the implications for manipulating tRNA properties by structure-based and combinatorial in vitro approaches reviewed. Since most of the signals conferring function to tRNAs are located on the two distal extremities of their three-dimensional L shape, this implies that the structure of the RNA domain connecting these two extremities can be of different architecture and/or can be modified without disturbing individual functions. This concept is first supported by the existence in nature of RNAs of peculiar structures having tRNA properties, as well as by engineering experiments on natural tRNAs. The concept is further illustrated by examples of RNAs designed by combinatorial methods. The different procedures used to select RNAs or tRNA-mimics interacting with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases or with elongation factors and to select tRNA-mimics aminoacylated by synthetases are presented, as well as the functional and structural characteristics of the selected molecules. Production and characteristics of aptameric RNAs fulfilling aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase functions and of RNAs selected to have affinities for amino acids are also described. Finally, properties of RNAs obtained by either the structure-based or the combinatorial methods are discussed in the light of the origin and evolution of the translation machinery, but also with a view to obtain new inhibitors targeting specific steps in translation.

Species-specific differences in amino acid editing by class II prolyl-tRNA synthetase

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are a family of enzymes responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the genetic code by specifically attaching a particular amino acid to their cognate tRNA substrates. Through primary sequence alignments, prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) have been divided into two phylogenetically divergent groups. We have been interested in understanding whether the unusual evolutionary pattern of ProRSs corresponds to functional differences as well. Previously, we showed that some features of tRNA recognition and aminoacylation are indeed group-specific. Here, we examine the species-specific differences in another enzymatic activity, namely amino acid editing. Proofreading or editing provides a mechanism by which incorrectly activated amino acids are hydrolyzed and thus prevented from misincorporation into proteins. "Prokaryotic-like" Escherichia coli ProRS has recently been shown to be capable of misactivating alanine and possesses both pretransfer and post-transfer hydrolytic editing activity against this noncognate amino acid. We now find that two ProRSs belonging to the "eukaryotic-like" group exhibit differences in their hydrolytic editing activity. Whereas ProRS from Methanococcus jannaschii is similar to E. coli in its ability to hydrolyze misactivated alanine via both pretransfer and post-transfer editing pathways, human ProRS lacks these activities. These results have implications for the selection or design of antibiotics that specifically target the editing active site of the prokaryotic-like group of ProRSs.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis

Aminoacyl-tRNAs are substrates for translation and are pivotal in determining how the genetic code is interpreted as amino acids. The function of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis is to precisely match amino acids with tRNAs containing the corresponding anticodon. This is primarily achieved by the direct attachment of an amino acid to the corresponding tRNA by an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, although intrinsic proofreading and extrinsic editing are also essential in several cases. Recent studies of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis, mainly prompted by the advent of whole genome sequencing and the availability of a vast body of structural data, have led to an expanded and more detailed picture of how aminoacyl-tRNAs are synthesized. This article reviews current knowledge of the biochemical, structural, and evolutionary facets of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis.

Importance of discriminator base stacking interactions: molecular dynamics analysis of A73 microhelix(Ala) variants

Transfer of alanine from Escherichia coli alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AlaRS) to RNA minihelices that mimic the amino acid acceptor stem of tRNA(Ala) has been shown, by analysis of variant minihelix aminoacylation activities, to involve a transition state sensitive to changes in the 'discriminator' base at position 73. Solution NMR has indicated that this single-stranded nucleotide is predominantly stacked onto G1 of the first base pair of the alanine acceptor stem helix. We report the activity of a new variant with the adenine at position 73 substituted by its non-polar isostere 4-methylindole (M). Despite lacking N7, this analog is well tolerated by AlaRS. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations show that the M substitution improves position 73 base stacking over G1, as measured by a stacking lifetime analysis. Additional MD simulations of wild-type microhelix(Ala) and six variants reveal a positive correlation between N73 base stacking propensity over G1 and aminoacylation activity. For the two DeltaN7 variants simulated we found that the propensity to stack over G1 was similar to the analogous variants that contain N7 and we conclude that the decrease in aminoacylation efficiency observed upon deletion of N7 is likely due to loss of a direct stabilizing interaction with the synthetase.

Transfer RNA recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are an ancient group of enzymes that catalyze the covalent attachment of an amino acid to its cognate transfer RNA. The question of specificity, that is, how each synthetase selects the correct individual or isoacceptor set of tRNAs for each amino acid, has been referred to as the second genetic code. A wealth of structural, biochemical, and genetic data on this subject has accumulated over the past 40 years. Although there are now crystal structures of sixteen of the twenty synthetases from various species, there are only a few high resolution structures of synthetases complexed with cognate tRNAs. Here we review briefly the structural information available for synthetases, and focus on the structural features of tRNA that may be used for recognition. Finally, we explore in detail the insights into specific recognition gained from classical and atomic group mutagenesis experiments performed with tRNAs, tRNA fragments, and small RNAs mimicking portions of tRNAs.

Identification of discriminator base atomic groups that modulate the alanine aminoacylation reaction

Specific aminoacylation of tRNAs involves activation of an amino acid with ATP followed by amino acid transfer to the tRNA. Previous work showed that the transfer of alanine from Escherichia coli alanyl-tRNA synthetase to a cognate RNA minihelix involves a transition state sensitive to changes in the tRNA acceptor stem. Specifically, the "discriminator" base at position 73 of minihelix(Ala) is a critical determinant of the transfer step of aminoacylation. This single-stranded nucleotide has previously been shown by solution NMR to be stacked predominantly onto G(1) of the first base pair of the alanine acceptor stem helix. In this work, RNA duplex(Ala) variants were prepared to investigate the role of specific discriminator base atomic groups in aminoacylation catalytic efficiency. Results indicate that the purine structure appears to be important for stabilization of the transition state and that major groove elements are more critical than those located in the minor groove. This result is in accordance with the predicted orientation of a class II synthetase at the end of the acceptor helix. In particular, substitution of the exocyclic amino group of A(73) with a keto-oxygen resulted in negative discrimination at this site. Taken together, these new results are consistent with the involvement of major groove atomic groups of the discriminator base in the formation of the transition state for the amino acid transfer step.

Major anticodon-binding region missing from an archaebacterial tRNA synthetase

The small size of the archaebacterial Methanococcus jannaschii tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase may give insights into the historical development of tRNAs and tRNA synthetases. The L-shaped tRNA has two major arms-the acceptor.TpsiC minihelix with the amino acid attachment site and the anticodon-containing arm. The structural organization of the tRNA synthetases parallels that of tRNAs. The more ancient synthetase domain contains the active site and insertions that interact with the minihelix portion of the tRNA. A second, presumably more recent, domain interacts with the anticodon-containing section of tRNA. The small size of the M. jannaschii enzyme is due to the absence of most of the second domain, including a segment thought to bind to the anticodon. Consistent with the absence of an anticodon-binding motif, a mutation of the central base of the anticodon had a relatively small effect on the aminoacylation efficiency of the M. jannaschii enzyme. In contrast, others showed earlier that the same mutation severely reduced charging by a normal-sized bacterial enzyme that has the aforementioned anticodon-binding motif. However, the M. jannaschii enzyme has a peptide insertion into its catalytic domain. This insertion is shared with all other tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases and is needed for a critical minihelix interaction. We show that the M. jannaschii enzyme is active on minihelix substrates over a wide temperature range and has preserved the same peptide-dependent minihelix specificity seen in other tyrosine enzymes. These findings are consistent with the concept that anticodon interactions of tRNA synthetases were later adaptations to the emerging synthetase-tRNA complex that was originally framed around the minihelix.

Domain-domain communication in a miniature archaebacterial tRNA synthetase

The three-dimensional structure of tRNA is organized into two domains-the acceptor-TPsiC minihelix with the amino acid attachment site and a second, anticodon-containing, stem-loop domain. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have a structural organization that roughly recapitulates the two-domain organization of tRNAs-an older primary domain that contains the catalytic center and interacts with the minihelix and a secondary, more recent, domain that makes contacts with the anticodon-containing arm. The latter contacts typically are essential for enhancement of the catalytic constant k(cat) through domain-domain communication. Methanococcus jannaschii tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase is a miniature synthetase with a tiny secondary domain suggestive of an early synthetase evolving from a one-domain to a two-domain structure. Here we demonstrate functional interactions with the anticodon-containing arm of tRNA that involve the miniaturized secondary domain. These interactions appear not to include direct contacts with the anticodon triplet but nonetheless lead to domain-domain communication. Thus, interdomain communication may have been established early in the evolution from one-domain to two-domain structures.