Tropomyosin inhibits the glutaraldehyde-induced cross-link between the central 48-kDa fragment of myosin head and segment 48-67 in actin subdomain 2

Cooperative effects of tropomyosin on the dynamics of the actin filament

Tropomyosin (Tpm) plays an important role in regulating the organisation and functions of the actin cytoskeleton. Here, we describe a new approach to analyse the effects of Tpm on actin dynamics. Using F-actin proteolytically modified within the DNase-binding loop (ECP-actin), we show that Tpm binding almost completely suppresses the increased subunit exchange intrinsic for this F-actin. The effect is both concentration-dependent and cooperative, with half-maximal inhibition observed at about a 1 : 50 Tpm : actin ratio. Tpm decreases not only the number concentration of ECP-actin filaments, but also the rate of the filament subunit exchange. Our data suggest that Tpm regulates the dynamics of actin filaments by an allosteric strengthening of intermonomer contacts in the actin filament, and that this mechanism may be involved in the modulation of cytoskeletal dynamics.

Tropomyosin as a Regulator of Actin Dynamics

Tropomyosin is a major regulatory protein of contractile systems and cytoskeleton, an actin-binding protein that positions laterally along actin filaments and modulates actin-myosin interaction. About 40 tropomyosin isoforms have been found in a variety of cytoskeleton systems, not necessarily connected with actin-myosin interaction and contraction. Involvement of specific tropomyosin isoforms in the regulation of key cell processes was shown, and specific features of tropomyosin genes and protein structure have been investigated with molecular biology and genetics approaches. However, the mechanisms underlying the effects of tropomyosin on cytoskeleton dynamics are still unclear. As tropomyosin is primarily an F-actin-binding protein, it is important to understand how it interacts both with actin and actin-binding proteins functioning in muscles and cytoskeleton to regulate actin dynamics. This review focuses on biochemical data on the effects of tropomyosin on actin assembly and dynamics, as well as on the modulation of these effects by actin-binding proteins. The data indicate that tropomyosin can efficiently regulate actin dynamics via allosteric conformational changes within actin filaments.

Decline of contractility during ischemia-reperfusion injury: actin glutathionylation and its effect on allosteric interaction with tropomyosin

The severity and duration of ischemia-reperfusion injury is hypothesized to play an important role in the ability of the heart subsequently to recover contractility. Permeabilized trabeculae were prepared from a rat model of ischemia-reperfusion injury to examine the impact on force generation. Compared with the control perfused condition, the maximum force (F(max)) per cross-sectional area and the rate of tension redevelopment of Ca(2+)-activated trabeculae fell by 71% and 44%, respectively, during ischemia despite the availability of a high concentration of ATP. The reduction in F(max) with ischemia was accompanied by a decline in fiber stiffness, implying a drop in the absolute number of attached cross bridges. However, the declines during ischemia were largely recovered after reperfusion, leading to the hypothesis that intrinsic, reversible posttranslational modifications to proteins of the contractile filaments occur during ischemia-reperfusion injury. Examination of thin-filament proteins from ischemic or ischemia-reperfused hearts did not reveal proteolysis of troponin I or T. However, actin was found to be glutathionylated with ischemia. Light-scattering experiments demonstrated that glutathionylated G-actin did not polymerize as efficiently as native G-actin. Although tropomyosin accelerated the time course of native and glutathionylated G-actin polymerization, the polymerization of glutathionylated G-actin still lagged native G-actin at all concentrations of tropomyosin tested. Furthermore, cosedimentation experiments demonstrated that tropomyosin bound glutathionylated F-actin with significantly reduced cooperativity. Therefore, glutathionylated actin may be a novel contributor to the diverse set of posttranslational modifications that define the function of the contractile filaments during ischemia-reperfusion injury.

The regulation of subtilisin-cleaved actin by tropomyosin/troponin

Vertebrate striated muscle contraction is regulated in a Ca(2+)-dependent fashion by tropomyosin (Tm) and troponin (Tn). This regulation involves shifts in the position of Tm and Tn on actin filaments and may include conformational changes in actin that are then communicated to myosin subfragment 1 (S1). To determine whether subdomain 2 of actin plays a role in this regulation, the DNase-I loop 38-52 of this subdomain was cleaved by subtilisin between residues Met(47) and Gly(48). Despite impaired unregulated function, the potentiation and regulation of cleaved actin movement in the in vitro motility assay was not significantly different from that of uncleaved actin. Stopped-flow measurements of ADP release from regulated and unregulated cleaved acto-S1 showed a marked increase in ADP release from acto-S1 in the presence of the regulatory complex. The enhancement of the actin affinity for S1 in the presence of regulatory proteins was greater for uncleaved than for cleaved F-actin. Finally, both cleaved and uncleaved actins protect myosin loop 1 from papain cleavage equally well. Our results suggest that the potentiation of actin function in the in vitro motility assay by regulatory proteins stems from changes in cross-bridge cycle kinetics. In addition, the unimpaired calcium-sensitive regulation of cleaved actin indicates that subdomain 2 conformation does not play an essential role in the regulation process.

Tropomyosin-troponin regulation of actin does not involve subdomain 2 motions

Dynamic properties of F-actin structure prompted suggestions (Squire, J. M., and Morris, E. P. (1998) FASEB J. 12, 761-771) that actin subdomain 2 movements play a role in thin-filament regulation. Using fluorescently labeled yeast actin mutants Q41C, Q41C/C374S, and D51C/C374S and azidonitrophenyl putrescine (ANP) Gln(41)-labeled alpha-actin, we monitored regulation-linked changes in subdomain 2. These actins had fully regulated acto-S1 ATPase activities, and emission spectra of regulated Q41C(AEDANS)/C374S and D51C(AEDANS)/C374S filaments did not reveal any calcium-dependent changes. Fluorescence energy transfer in these F-actins mostly occurred from Trp(340) and Trp(356) to 5-(2((acetyl)amino)ethyl)amino-naphthalene-1-sulfonate (AEDANS)-labeled Cys(41) or Cys(51) of adjacent same strand protomers. Our results show that fluorescence energy transfer between these residues is similar in the mostly blocked (-Ca(2+)) and closed (+Ca(2+)) states. Ca(2+) also had no effect on the excimer band in the pyrene-labeled Q41C-regulated actin, indicating virtually no change in the overlap of pyrenes on Cys(41) and Cys(374). ANP quenching of rhodamine phalloidin fluorescence showed that neither Ca(2+) nor S1 binding to regulated alpha-actin affects the phalloidin-probe distance. Taken together, our results indicate that transitions between the blocked, closed, and open regulatory states involve no significant subdomain 2 movements, and, since the cross-linked alpha-actin remains fully regulated, that subdomain 2 motions are not essential for actin regulation.

Effect of intramolecular cross-linking between glutamine-41 and lysine-50 on actin structure and function

Subdomain 2 of actin is a dynamic segment of the molecule. The cross-linking of Gln-41 on subdomain 2 to Cys-374 on an adjacent monomer in F-actin inhibits actomyosin motility and force generation (Kim et al., 1998; Biochemistry 37, 17,801-17,809). To shed light on this effect, additional modifications of the Gln-41 site on actin were carried out. Both intact G-actin and G-actin cleaved by subtilisin between Met-47 and Gly-48 in the DNase 1 binding loop of subdomain 2 were treated with bacterial transglutaminase. According to the results of Edman degradation, transglutaminase introduced an intramolecular zero-length cross-linking between Gln-41 and Lys-50 in both intact and subtilisin cleaved actins. This cross-linking perturbs G-actin structure as shown by the inhibition of subtilisin and tryptic cleavage in subdomain 2, an allosteric inhibition of tryptic cleavage at the C-terminus and decrease of modification rate of Cys-374. The cross-linking increases while the subtilisin cleavage dramatically decreases the thermostability of F-actin. The Mg- and S1-induced polymerizations of both intact and subtilisin cleaved actins were only slightly influenced by the cross-linking. The activation of S1 ATPase by actin and the sliding speeds of actin filaments in the in vitro motility assays were essentially unchanged by the cross-linking. Thus, although intramolecular cross-linking between Gln-41 and Lys-50 perturbs the structure of the actin monomer, it has only a small effect on actin polymerization and its interaction with myosin. These results suggest that the new cross-linking does not alter the intermonomer interface in F-actin and that changes in actomyosin motility reported for the Gln-41-Cys-374 intrastrand cross-linked actin are not due to decreased flexibility of loop 38-52 but to constrains introduced into the F-actin structure and/or to perturbations at the actin's C-terminus.

An actin subdomain 2 mutation that impairs thin filament regulation by troponin and tropomyosin

Striated muscle thin filaments adopt different quaternary structures, depending upon calcium binding to troponin and myosin binding to actin. Modification of actin subdomain 2 alters troponin-tropomyosin-mediated regulation, suggesting that this region of actin may contain important protein-protein interaction sites. We used yeast actin mutant D56A/E57A to examine this issue. The mutation increased the affinity of tropomyosin for actin 3-fold. The addition of Ca(2+) to mutant actin filaments containing troponin-tropomyosin produced little increase in the thin filament-myosin S1 MgATPase rate. Despite this, three-dimensional reconstruction of electron microscope images of filaments in the presence of troponin and Ca(2+) showed tropomyosin to be in a position similar to that found for muscle actin filaments, where most of the myosin binding site is exposed. Troponin-tropomyosin bound with comparable affinity to mutant and wild type actin in the absence and presence of calcium, and in the presence of myosin S1, tropomyosin bound very tightly to both types of actin. The mutation decreased actin-myosin S1 affinity 13-fold in the presence of troponin-tropomyosin and 2.6-fold in the absence of the regulatory proteins. The results suggest the importance of negatively charged actin subdomain 2 residues 56 and 57 for myosin binding to actin, for tropomyosin-actin interactions, and for regulatory conformational changes in the actin-troponin-tropomyosin complex.

Differences in the ionic interaction of actin with the motor domains of nonmuscle and muscle myosin II

Changes in the actin-myosin interface are thought to play an important role in microfilament-linked cellular movements. In this study, we compared the actin binding properties of the motor domain of Dictyostelium discoideum (M765) and rabbit skeletal muscle myosin subfragment-1 (S1). The Dictyostelium motor domain resembles S1(A2) (S1 carrying the A2 light chain) in its interaction with G-actin. Similar to S1(A2), none of the Dictyostelium motor domain constructs induced G-actin polymerization. The affinity of monomeric actin (G-actin) was 20-fold lower for M765 than for S1(A2) but increasing the number of positive charges in the loop 2 region of the D. discoideum motor domain (residues 613-623) resulted in equivalent affinities of G-actin for M765 and for S1. Proteolytic cleavage and cross-linking approaches were used to show that M765, like S1, interacts via the loop 2 region with filamentous actin (F-actin). For both types of myosin, F-actin prevents trypsin cleavage in the loop 2 region and F-actin segment 1-28 can be cross-linked to loop 2 residues by a carbodiimide-induced reaction. In contrast with the S1, loop residues 559-565 of D. discoideum myosin was not cross-linked to F-actin, probably due to the lower number of positive charges. These results confirm the importance of the loop 2 region of myosin for the interaction with both G-actin and F-actin, regardless of the source of myosin. The differences observed in the way in which M765 and S1 interact with actin may be linked to more general differences in the structure of the actomyosin interface of muscle and nonmuscle myosins.

Transglutaminase-induced cross-linking between subdomain 2 of G-actin and the 636-642 lysine-rich loop of myosin subfragment 1

G-actin was covalently cross-linked with S1 in a bacterial transglutaminase-catalyzed reaction. The cross-linking sites were identified with the help of fluorescent probes and limited proteolysis as the Gln-41 on the DNase I binding loop of subdomain 2 in G-actin and a lysine-rich loop (residues 636-642) on the S1 heavy chain. The same lysine-rich loop was cross-linked to another region of G-actin in a former study (Combeau, C., D. Didry, and M-F. Carlier. 1992. J. Biol. Chem. 267:14038-14046). This indicates the existence of more than one G-actin-S1 complex. In contrast to G-actin, no cross-linking was induced between F-actin and S1 by the transglutaminase reaction. This shows that in F-actin the inner part of the DNase I binding loop, where Gln-41 is located, is not accessible for S1. The cross-linked G-actin-S1 polymerized upon addition of 2 mM MgCl2 as indicated by electron microscopy and sedimentation experiments. The filaments obtained from the polymerization of cross-linked actin and S1 were much shorter than the control actin filaments. The ATPase activity of the cross-linked S1 was not activated by actin, whereas the K+ (EDTA)-activated ATPase activity of S1 was unaffected by the cross-linking. The cross-linking between G-actin and S1 was not influenced by the exchange of the tightly bound calcium to magnesium; however, it was inhibited by the exchange of the actin-bound ATP to ADP. This finding supports the view that the structure of the DNase binding loop in ADP-G-actin is somewhere between the structures of ATP-G-actin and F-actin.

The structure of the acto-myosin subfragment 1 complex: results of searches using data from electron microscopy and x-ray crystallography

Surmises of how myosin subfragment 1 (S1) interacts with actin filaments in muscle contraction rest upon knowing the relative arrangement of the two proteins. Although there exist crystallographic structures for both S1 and actin, as well as electron microscopy data for the acto-S1 complex (AS1), modeling of this arrangement has so far only been done "by eye." Here we report fitted AS1 structures obtained using a quantitative method that is both more objective and makes more complete use of the data. Using undistorted crystallographic results, the best-fit AS1 structure shows significant differences from that obtained by visual fitting. The best fit is produced using the F-actin model of Holmes et al. [Holmes, K. C., Popp, D., Gebhard, W. & Kabsch, W. (1990) Nature (London) 347, 44-49]. S1 residues at the AS1 interface are now found at a higher radius as well as being translated axially and rotated azimuthally. Fits using S1 plus loops missing from the crystal structure were achieved using a homology search method to predict loop structures. These improved fits favor an arrangement in which the loop at the 50- to 20-kDa domain junction of S1 is located near the N terminus of actin. Rigid-body movements of the lower 50-kDa domain, which further improve the fit, produce closure of the large 50-kDa domain cleft and bring conserved residues in the lower 50-kDa domain into an apparently appropriate orientation for close interaction with actin. This finding supports the idea that binding of ATP to AS1 at the end of the ATPase cycle disrupts the actin binding site by changing the conformation of the 50-kDa cleft of S1.

New insights into actin filament dynamics

Great progress has been made in advancing an atomic-level model for F-actin. A growing body of data shows, however, that any picture of F-actin must take into account allosteric interactions within subunits, long-range cooperative effects that occur between subunits, and the fact that several conformations of the filament can exist.

Actin and the actomyosin interface: a review

This review deals with the structure of the actin monomer, its assembly into filaments and the loci on F-actin involved in binding myosin. Two distinctly different arrangements of monomers have been suggested for actin filaments. One model proposed by Holmes et al. is well developed. It places the so-called 'large' domain close to the filament axis and the so-called 'small' domain out near the surface of the filament. A second, less-well developed, model proposed by Schutt et al. locates the 'small' domain close to the filament axis and they rotate the monomer so that 'bottom' of the 'large' domain is at the highest radius. We analyze the available evidence for the models of F-actin derived from X-ray diffraction, reconstructions from electron micrographs, fluorescence resonance energy transfer spectroscopy, chemical cross-linking, antibody probes, limited proteolysis, site-directed and natural mutations, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and other techniques. The result is an actin-centered view of the loci on actin which are probably involved in its interaction with the myosin 'head'. From these multiple contacts we speculate on the sequence of steps between the initial weak-binding state of S-1 to the actin filament through to the stable strong-binding state seen in the absence of free Mg-ATP, i.e., the rigor state.