Ricin A-chain inhibitors resembling the oxacarbenium ion transition state

1H, 13C, and 15N backbone and methyl group resonance assignments of ricin toxin A subunit

Ricin is a potent plant toxin that targets the eukaryotic ribosome by depurinating an adenine from the sarcin-ricin loop (SRL), a highly conserved stem-loop of the rRNA. As a category-B agent for bioterrorism it is a prime target for therapeutic intervention with antibodies and enzyme blocking inhibitors since no effective therapy exists for ricin. Ricin toxin A subunit (RTA) depurinates the SRL by binding to the P-stalk proteins at a remote site. Stimulation of the N-glycosidase activity of RTA by the P-stalk proteins has been studied extensively by biochemical methods and by X-ray crystallography. The current understanding of RTA's depurination mechanism relies exclusively on X-ray structures of the enzyme in the free state and complexed with transition state analogues. To date we have sparse evidence of conformational dynamics and allosteric regulation of RTA activity that can be exploited in the rational design of inhibitors. Thus, our primary goal here is to apply solution NMR techniques to probe the residue specific structural and dynamic coupling active in RTA as a prerequisite to understand the functional implications of an allosteric network. In this report we present de novo sequence specific amide and sidechain methyl chemical shift assignments of the 267 residue RTA in the free state and in complex with an 11-residue peptide (P11) representing the identical C-terminal sequence of the ribosomal P-stalk proteins. These assignments will facilitate future studies detailing the propagation of binding induced conformational changes in RTA complexed with inhibitors, antibodies, and biologically relevant targets.

Pokeweed antiviral protein, a ribosome inactivating protein: activity, inhibition and prospects

Viruses employ an array of elaborate strategies to overcome plant defense mechanisms and must adapt to the requirements of the host translational systems. Pokeweed antiviral protein (PAP) from Phytolacca americana is a ribosome inactivating protein (RIP) and is an RNA N-glycosidase that removes specific purine residues from the sarcin/ricin (S/R) loop of large rRNA, arresting protein synthesis at the translocation step. PAP is thought to play an important role in the plant's defense mechanism against foreign pathogens. This review focuses on the structure, function, and the relationship of PAP to other RIPs, discusses molecular aspects of PAP antiviral activity, the novel inhibition of this plant toxin by a virus counteraction-a peptide linked to the viral genome (VPg), and possible applications of RIP-conjugated immunotoxins in cancer therapeutics.

Mechanistic insights into the neutralization of cytotoxic abrin by the monoclonal antibody D6F10

Abrin, an A/B toxin obtained from the Abrus precatorius plant is extremely toxic and a potential bio-warfare agent. Till date there is no antidote or vaccine available against this toxin. The only known neutralizing monoclonal antibody against abrin, namely D6F10, has been shown to rescue the toxicity of abrin in cells as well as in mice. The present study focuses on mapping the epitopic region to understand the mechanism of neutralization of abrin by the antibody D6F10. Truncation and mutational analysis of abrin A chain revealed that the amino acids 74-123 of abrin A chain contain the core epitope and the residues Thr112, Gly114 and Arg118 are crucial for binding of the antibody. In silico analysis of the position of the mapped epitope indicated that it is present close to the active site cleft of abrin A chain. Thus, binding of the antibody near the active site blocks the enzymatic activity of abrin A chain, thereby rescuing inhibition of protein synthesis by the toxin in vitro. At 1∶10 molar concentration of abrin:antibody, the antibody D6F10 rescued cells from abrin-mediated inhibition of protein synthesis but did not prevent cell attachment of abrin. Further, internalization of the antibody bound to abrin was observed in cells by confocal microscopy. This is a novel finding which suggests that the antibody might function intracellularly and possibly explains the rescue of abrin's toxicity by the antibody in whole cells and animals. To our knowledge, this study is the first report on a neutralizing epitope for abrin and provides mechanistic insights into the poorly understood mode of action of anti-A chain antibodies against several toxins including ricin.

Neutralising antibodies against ricin toxin

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have listed the potential bioweapon ricin as a Category B Agent. Ricin is a so-called A/B toxin produced by plants and is one of the deadliest molecules known. It is easy to prepare and no curative treatment is available. An immunotherapeutic approach could be of interest to attenuate or neutralise the effects of the toxin. We sought to characterise neutralising monoclonal antibodies against ricin and to develop an effective therapy. For this purpose, mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were produced against the two chains of ricin toxin (RTA and RTB). Seven mAbs were selected for their capacity to neutralise the cytotoxic effects of ricin in vitro. Three of these, two anti-RTB (RB34 and RB37) and one anti-RTA (RA36), when used in combination improved neutralising capacity in vitro with an IC₅₀ of 31 ng/ml. Passive administration of association of these three mixed mAbs (4.7 µg) protected mice from intranasal challenges with ricin (5 LD₅₀). Among those three antibodies, anti-RTB antibodies protected mice more efficiently than the anti-RTA antibody. The combination of the three antibodies protected mice up to 7.5 hours after ricin challenge. The strong in vivo neutralising capacity of this three mAbs combination makes it potentially useful for immunotherapeutic purposes in the case of ricin poisoning or possibly for prevention.

Ricin: current understanding and prospects for an antiricin vaccine

Ricin is a potent cytotoxin that can be rapidly internalized into mammalian cells leading to cell death. The ease in obtaining the toxin and its deadly nature combine to implicate ricin as a convenient agent for bioterrorism. Research into the mechanism of toxicity, as well as strategies for treatment and protection from the toxin has been widely undertaken for a number of years. This article reviews the current understanding of the mechanism of action of the toxin, the clinical effects of ricin intoxication and how these relate to current and continuing prospects for vaccine development.

The evolving field of biodefence: therapeutic developments and diagnostics

Bioweapons are a clear threat to both military and civilian populations. Here, the latest advances in the pursuit of inhibitors against biothreat threat toxins, current therapeutic strategies for treating biodefence related pathogens, and strategies for improving detection and exposure survivability are covered.

There are numerous lead therapeutics that have emerged from drug discovery efforts. However, many of these are toxic and/or fail to possess conventional drug-like properties. One clear advantage of small (non-peptidic) molecules is that they possess scaffolds that are inherently more likely to evolve into real therapeutics.

One of the major obstacles impeding the translation of these lead therapeutics into viable drugs is the lack of involvement of the pharmaceutical industry, which has been discovering leads and translating them into drugs for decades. The expertise of the pharmaceutical industry therefore needs to be more effectively engaged in developing drugs against biothreat agents.

New methods for rapidly detecting and diagnosing biothreat agents are also in development. The detection and diagnosis of biothreats is inherently linked with treatment. The means for detecting the release of bioweapons are being deployed, and new technologies are shortening the timeframe between initial sample collection and conclusive agent determination. However, the organization of this process is imperfect.

At present, a unifying entity that orchestrates the biodefence response is clearly needed to reduce the time-to-drug process and redundancies in drug development efforts. Such a central entity could formulate and implement plans to coordinate all participants, including academic institutions, government agencies and the private sector. This could accelerate the development of countermeasures against high probability biothreat agents.

The threat of bioterrorism and the potential use of biological weapons against both military and civilian populations has become a major concern for governments around the world. For example, in 2001 anthrax-tainted letters resulted in several deaths, caused widespread public panic and exerted a heavy economic toll. If such a small-scale act of bioterrorism could have such a huge impact, then the effects of a large-scale attack would be catastrophic. This review covers recent progress in developing therapeutic countermeasures against, and diagnostics for, such agents.

Antitoxins: novel strategies to target agents of bioterrorism

Never before has there been such a strong possibility that biological agents might be used indiscriminately on civilian populations. This review focuses on the use of antitoxins - antibodies, receptor decoys, dominant-negative inhibitors of translocation, small-molecule inhibitors and substrate analogues - to counteract those biological weapons for which toxins are an important mechanism of disease pathogenesis.

The Synthesis of N-Ribosyl Transferase Inhibitors Based on a Transition State Blueprint

A quarter of a century ago transition state analysis and transition state analogue design promised the prospect of extraordinarily potent enzyme inhibitors. The present overview describes the transition state analysis of a variety of N-ribosyl transferases, the design and synthesis of extremely powerful transition state analogue inhibitors of these nucleoside processing enzymes, and their current therapeutic uses and potentials.

Adenine release is fast in MutY-catalyzed hydrolysis of G:A and 8-Oxo-G:A DNA mismatches

MutY, a DNA repair enzyme, is unusual in that it binds exceedingly tightly to its products after the chemical steps of catalysis. Until now it was not known whether the product being released in the rate-limiting step was DNA, adenine, or both. MutY hydrolyzes adenine from 8-oxo-G:A (OG:A) base pair mismatches as the first step in the base excision repair pathway, as well as from G:A mismatches. The products are adenine and DNA containing an apurinic (AP) site. Tight product binding may have a physiological role in preventing further damage at the OG:AP site. We developed a rate assay using [8-14C]adenine in OG:A or G:A mismatches that distinguishes between adenine hydrolysis and adenine release. [8-14C]Adenine was released quickly from the MutY.AP-DNA.[8-14C]adenine complex, with a rate constant greater than 5 min-1. This was much faster than the rate-limiting step, at 0.006-0.015 min-1. Gel retardation experiments showed that AP-DNA release was very slow, consistent with it being the rate-limiting step. Thus, the kinetic mechanism involves fast adenine release after hydrolysis followed by rate-limiting AP-DNA release. Adenine appears to be buried deep in the protein.DNA interface, but there is enough flexibility or open space for it to dissociate from the MutY.APDNA.adenine complex. These results have implications for the catalytic mechanism of MutY.

Therapy and prophylaxis of inhaled biological toxins

This review highlights the current lack of therapeutic and prophylactic treatments for use against inhaled biological toxins, especially those considered as potential biological warfare (BW) or terrorist threats. Although vaccine development remains a priority, the use of rapidly deployable adjunctive therapeutic or prophylactic drugs could be life-saving in severe cases of intoxication or where vaccination has not been possible or immunity not established. The current lack of such drugs is due to many factors. Thus, methods involving molecular modelling are limited by the extent to which the cellular receptor sites and mode of action and structure of a toxin need to be known. There is also our general lack of knowledge of what effect individual toxins will have when inhaled into the lungs - whether and to what extent the action will be cell specific and cytotoxic or rather an acute inflammatory response requiring the use of immunomodulators. Possible sources of specific high-affinity toxin antagonists being investigated include monoclonal antibodies, selected oligonucleotides (aptamers) and derivatized dendritic polymers (dendrimers). The initial selection of suitable agents of these kinds can be made using cytotoxicity assays involving cultured normal human lung cells and a range of suitable indicators. The possibility that a mixture of selected antibody, aptamer or dendrimer-based materials for one or more toxins could be delivered simultaneously as injections or as inhaled aerosol sprays should be investigated.