Proton transfer reactions in the F86D and F86E mutants of pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II)

Lokiarchaeota archaeon schizorhodopsin-2 (LaSzR2) is an inward proton pump displaying a characteristic feature of acid-induced spectral blue-shift

The photoreactive protein rhodopsin is widespread in microorganisms and has a variety of photobiological functions. Recently, a novel phylogenetically distinctive group named ‘schizorhodopsin (SzR)’ has been identified as an inward proton pump. We performed functional and spectroscopic studies on an uncharacterised schizorhodopsin from the phylum Lokiarchaeota archaeon. The protein, LaSzR2, having an all-trans-retinal chromophore, showed inward proton pump activity with an absorption maximum at 549 nm. The pH titration experiments revealed that the protonated Schiff base of the retinal chromophore (Lys188, pK_a = 12.3) is stabilised by the deprotonated counterion (presumably Asp184, pK_a = 3.7). The flash-photolysis experiments revealed the presence of two photointermediates, K and M. A proton was released and uptaken from bulk solution upon the formation and decay of the M intermediate. During the M-decay, the Schiff base was reprotonated by the proton from a proton donating residue (presumably Asp172). These properties were compared with other inward (SzRs and xenorhodopsins, XeRs) and outward proton pumps. Notably, LaSzR2 showed acid-induced spectral ‘blue-shift’ due to the protonation of the counterion, whereas outward proton pumps showed opposite shifts (red-shifts). Thus, we can distinguish between inward and outward proton pumps by the direction of the acid-induced spectral shift.

Phototactic and chemotactic signal transduction by transmembrane receptors and transducers in microorganisms

Microorganisms show attractant and repellent responses to survive in the various environments in which they live. Those phototaxic (to light) and chemotaxic (to chemicals) responses are regulated by membrane-embedded receptors and transducers. This article reviews the following: (1) the signal relay mechanisms by two photoreceptors, Sensory Rhodopsin I (SRI) and Sensory Rhodopsin II (SRII) and their transducers (HtrI and HtrII) responsible for phototaxis in microorganisms; and (2) the signal relay mechanism of a chemoreceptor/transducer protein, Tar, responsible for chemotaxis in E. coli. Based on results mainly obtained by our group together with other findings, the possible molecular mechanisms for phototaxis and chemotaxis are discussed.

Structural changes in the O-decay accelerated mutants of pharaonis phoborhodopsin

pharaonis phoborhodopsin ( ppR, also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, psRII) is a receptor for negative phototaxis in Natronomonas pharaonis. The X-ray crystallographic structure of ppR is very similar to those of the ion-pumping rhodopsins, bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and halorhodopsin (hR). However, the decay processes of the photocycle intermediates such as M and O are much slower than those of BR and hR, which is advantageous for the sensor function of ppR. Iwamoto et al. previously found that, in a quadruple mutant (P182S/P183E/V194T/T204C; denoted as SETC) of ppR, the decay of the O intermediate was accelerated by approximately 100 times ( t 1/2 approximately 6.6 ms vs 690 ms for the wild type of ppR), being almost equal to that of BR (Iwamoto, M., et al. (2005) Biophys. J. 88, 1215-1223). The mutated residues are located on the extracellular surface (Pro182, Pro183, and Val194) and near the Schiff base (Thr204). The present Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of SETC revealed that protein structural changes in the K and M states were similar to those of the wild type. In contrast, the ppR O minus ppR infrared difference spectra of SETC are clearly different from those of the wild type in amide-I (1680-1640 cm (-1)) and S-H stretching (2580-2520 cm (-1)) vibrations. The 1673 (+) and 1656 (-) cm (-1) bands newly appear for SETC in the frequency region typical for the amide-I vibration of the alpha II- and alpha I-helices, respectively. The intensities of the 1673 (+) cm (-1) band of various mutants were well correlated with their O-decay half-times. Since the alpha II-helix possesses a considerably distorted structure, the result implies that distortion of the helix is required for fast O-decay. In addition, the characteristic changes in the S-H stretching vibration of Cys204 were different between SETC and T204C, suggesting that structural change near the Schiff base was induced by mutations of the extracellular surface. We conclude that the lifetime of the O intermediate in ppR is regulated by the distorted alpha-helix and strengthened hydrogen bond of Cys204.

Tryptophan 171 in Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II) interacts with the chromophore retinal and its substitution with alanine or threonine slowed down the decay of M- and O-intermediate

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR), also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, NpSRII, is a photoreceptor for the photophobic response of Natronomonas pharaonis. Tryptophan 182 (W182) of bacteriorhodopsin (bR) is near the chromophore retinal and has been suggested to interact with retinal during the photoreaction and also to be involved in the hydrogen-bonding network around the retinal. W182 of bR is conserved in ppR as tryptophan 171 (W171). To elucidate whether W171 of ppR interacts with retinal during the photoreaction and/or is involved in the hydrogen-bonding network as in bR, we formed W171-substituted mutants of ppR, W171A and W171T. Our low-temperature spectroscopic study has revealed that the substitution of W171 to Ala or Thr resulted in the stabilization of M- and O-intermediates. The stability of M and absorption spectral changes during the M-decay were different depending on the substituted residue. These findings suggest that W171 in ppR interacts with retinal and the degree of the interaction depends on the substituted residues, which might be rate determining in the M-decay. In addition, the involvement of W171 in the hydrogen-bonding network is suggested by the O-decay. We also found that glycerol slowed the decay of M and not of O.

Electrostatic potential at the retinal of three archaeal rhodopsins: implications for their different absorption spectra

The color tuning mechanism of the rhodopsin protein family has been in the focus of research for decades. However, the structural basis of the tuning mechanism in general and of the absorption shift between rhodopsins in particular remains under discussion. It is clear that a major determinant for spectral shifts between different rhodopsins are electrostatic interactions between the chromophore retinal and the protein. Based on the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, we computed and compared the electrostatic potential at the retinal of three archaeal rhodopsins: bacteriorhodopsin (BR), halorhodopsin (HR), and sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) for which high-resolution structures are available. These proteins are an excellent test case for understanding the spectral tuning of retinal. The absorption maxima of BR and HR are very similar, whereas the spectrum of SRII is considerably blue shifted--despite the structural similarity between these three proteins. In agreement with their absorption maxima, we find that the electrostatic potential is similar in BR and HR, whereas significant differences are seen for SRII. The decomposition of the electrostatic potential into contributions of individual residues, allowed us to identify seven residues that are responsible for the differences in electrostatic potential between the proteins. Three of these residues are located in the retinal binding pocket and have in fact been shown to account for part of the absorption shift between BR and SRII by mutational studies. One residue is located close to the beta-ionone ring of retinal and the remaining three residues are more than 8 A away from the retinal. These residues have not been discussed before, because they are, partly because of their location, no obvious candidates for the spectral shift among BR, HR, and SRII. However, their contribution to the differences in electrostatic potential is evident. The counterion of the Schiff base, which is frequently discussed to be involved in the spectral tuning, does not contribute to the dissimilarities between the electrostatic potentials.

Role of Arg-72 of pharaonis Phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II) on its photochemistry

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR, or pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, NpsRII) is a sensor for the negative phototaxis of Natronomonas (Natronobacterium) pharaonis. Arginine 72 of ppR corresponds to Arg-82 of bacteriorhodopsin, which is a highly conserved residue among microbial rhodopsins. Using various Arg-72 ppR mutants, we obtained the following results: 1). Arg-72(ppR) together possibly with Asp-193 influenced the pK(a) of the counterion of the protonated Schiff base. 2). The M-rise became approximately four times faster than the wild-type. 3). Illumination causes proton uptake and release, and the pH profiles of the sequence of these two proton movements were different between R72A mutant and the wild-type; it is inferred that Arg-72 connects the proton transfer events occurring at both the Schiff base and an extracellular proton-releasing residue (Asp-193). 4). The M-decays of Arg-72 mutants were faster ( approximately 8-27 folds at pH 8 depending on mutants) than the wild-type, implying that the guanidinium prevents the proton transfer from the extracellular space to the deprotonated Schiff base. 5), The proton-pumping activities were decreased for mutants having increased M-decay rates, but the extent of the decrease was smaller than expected. The role of Arg-72 of ppR on the photochemistry was discussed.

Correlation of the O-intermediate rate with the pKa of Asp-75 in the dark, the counterion of the Schiff base of Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II)

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR), also called pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, NpSRII, is a photoreceptor of negative phototaxis in Natronomonas (Natronobacterium) pharaonis. The photocycle rate of ppR is slow compared to that of bacteriorhodopsin, despite the similarity in their x-ray structures. The decreased rate of the photocycle of ppR is a result of the longer lifetime of later photo-intermediates such as M- (ppR(M)) and O-intermediates (ppR(O)). In this study, mutants were prepared in which mutated residues were located on the extracellular surface (P182, P183, and V194) and near the Schiff base (T204) including single, triple (P182S/P183E/V194T), and quadruple mutants. The decay of ppR(O) of the triple mutant was accelerated approximately 20-times from 690 ms for the wild-type to 36 ms. Additional mutation resulting in a triple mutant at the 204th position such as T204C or T204S further decreased the decay half-time to 6.6 or 8 ms, almost equal to that of bacteriorhodopsin. The decay half-times of the ppR(O) of mutants (11 species) and those of the wild-type were well-correlated with the pK(a) value of Asp-75 in the dark for the respective mutants as spectroscopically estimated, although there are some exceptions. The implications of these observations are discussed in detail.