Cooperative DNA binding by the B-isoform of human progesterone receptor: thermodynamic analysis reveals strongly favorable and unfavorable contributions to assembly

Dissecting Steroid Receptor Function by Analytical Ultracentrifugation

Steroid receptors comprise a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The members include the androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and progesterone receptor (PR). Each receptor controls distinct sets of genes associated with development, metabolism, and homeostasis. Although a qualitative understanding of how individual receptors mediate gene expression has come into focus, quantitative insight remains less clear. As a step toward delineating the physical mechanisms by which individual receptors activate their target genes, we have carried out a systematic dissection of receptor interaction energetics with their multisite regulatory elements. Analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) has proved indispensable in these studies, in part by revealing the energetics of receptor self-association and its thermodynamic coupling to DNA binding. Here, we discuss these findings in the context of understanding specificity of receptor-mediated gene control. We first highlight the role of sedimentation velocity and sedimentation equilibrium in addressing receptor assembly state, and present a comparative analysis across the receptor family. We then use these results for understanding how receptors assemble at multisite regulatory elements, and hypothesize how these findings might play a role in receptor-specific gene regulation. Finally, we examine receptor behavior in a cellular context, with a view toward linking our in vitro studies with in vivo function.

Homologous steroid receptors assemble at identical promoter architectures with unique energetics of cooperativity

Steroid receptors comprise a homologous family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The receptors bind largely identical response elements in vitro, yet regulate distinct gene networks in vivo. This paradox raises the issue of how transcriptional specificity is achieved, particularly if multiple receptor populations are competing for identical sites. Noting that receptor-DNA energetics are a primary force in driving transcriptional activity, differences in interaction energetics among the receptors might underlie receptor-specific transcriptional control. Thermodynamic dissections support this premise-upon assembling at an identical promoter architecture, individual receptors exhibit vast differences in cooperative and self-association energetics. More intriguingly, these parameters distribute in a way that mirrors the evolutionary divergence of the steroid receptor family. For example, the closely related progesterone and glucocorticoid receptors (PR and GR) display little or no self-association but strong intersite cooperativity, whereas the more distantly related estrogen receptor (ER-α) shows inverse behavior. These findings suggest that receptors view genomic promoter architectures as a collection of affinity landscapes; receptors select from this landscape via their unique interaction energetics. To test this idea, we analyzed the cooperative binding energetics of the above three receptors using an array of promoters. We find that cooperativity is not only receptor-specific but also highly promoter-specific. Thus PR shows maximal cooperativity at promoters with closely spaced and in phase binding sites. GR cooperativity is maintained over greater distances, is larger energetically, and shows markedly different phase dependency. Finally, ER-α appears incapable of cooperativity regardless of promoter architecture, consistent with its more distant phylogeny.

Dissection of androgen receptor-promoter interactions: steroid receptors partition their interaction energetics in parallel with their phylogenetic divergence

Steroid receptors comprise a homologous family of ligand-activated transcription factors. The members include androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), mineralocorticoid receptor (MR), and progesterone receptor (PR). Phylogenetic studies demonstrate that AR, GR, MR, and PR are most closely related, falling into subgroup 3C. ER is more distantly related, falling into subgroup 3A. To determine the quantitative basis by which receptors generate their unique transcriptional responses, we are systematically dissecting the promoter-binding energetics of all receptors under a single "standard state" condition. Here, we examine the self-assembly and promoter-binding energetics of full-length AR and a mutant associated with prostate cancer, T877A. We first demonstrate that both proteins exist only as monomers, showing no evidence of dimerization. Although this result contradicts the traditional understanding that steroid receptors dimerize in the absence of DNA, it is fully consistent with our previous work demonstrating that GR and two PR isoforms either do not dimerize or dimerize only weakly. Moreover, both AR proteins exhibit substantial cooperativity between binding sites, again as seen for GR and PR. In sharp contrast, the more distantly related ER-α dimerizes so strongly that energetics can only be measured indirectly, yet cooperativity is negligible. Thus, homologous receptors partition their promoter-binding energetics quite differently. Moreover, since receptors most closely related by phylogeny partition their energetics similarly, such partitioning appears to be evolutionarily conserved. We speculate that such differences in energetics, coupled with different promoter architectures, serve as the basis for generating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus function.

Analysis of a glucocorticoid-estrogen receptor chimera reveals that dimerization energetics are under ionic control

Steroid receptors assemble at DNA response elements as dimers, resulting in coactivator recruitment and transcriptional activation. Our work has focused on dissecting the energetics associated with these events and quantitatively correlating the results with function. A recent finding is that different receptors dimerize with large differences in energetics. For example, estrogen receptor-α (ER-α) dimerizes with a ΔG=-12.0 kcal/mol under conditions in which the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) dimerizes with a ΔG≤-5.1 kcal/mol. To determine the molecular forces responsible for such differences, we created a GR/ER chimera, replacing the hormone-binding domain (HBD) of GR with that of ER-α. Cellular and biophysical analyses demonstrate that the chimera is functionally active. However, GR/ER dimerization energetics are intermediate between the parent proteins and coupled to a strong ionic linkage. Since the ER-α HBD is the primary contributor to dimerization, we suggest that GR residues constrain an ion-regulated HBD assembly reaction.

Glucocorticoid receptor-promoter interactions: energetic dissection suggests a framework for the specificity of steroid receptor-mediated gene regulation

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) is a member of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors. A number of studies have shown that steroid receptors regulate distinct but overlapping sets of genes; however, the molecular basis for such specificity remains unclear. Previous work from our laboratory has demonstrated that under identical solution conditions, three other steroid receptors [the progesterone receptor A isoform (PR-A), the progesterone receptor B isoform (PR-B), and estrogen receptor α (ER-α)] differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics. For example, PR-A and PR-B generate similar dimerization free energies but differ significantly in their extents of intersite cooperativity. Conversely, ER-α maintains an intersite cooperativity most comparable to that of PR-A yet dimerizes with an affinity orders of magnitude greater than that of either of the PR isoforms. We have speculated that these differences serve to generate receptor-specific promoter occupancies, and thus receptor-specific gene regulation. Noting that GR regulates a unique subset of genes relative to the other receptors, we hypothesized that the receptor should maintain a unique set of interaction energetics. We rigorously determined the self-association and promoter binding energetics of full-length, human GR under conditions identical to those used in our earlier studies. We find that unlike all other receptors, GR shows no evidence of reversible self-association. Moreover, GR assembles with strong intersite cooperativity comparable to that seen only for PR-B. Finally, simulations show that such partitioning of interaction energetics allows for receptor-specific promoter occupancies, even under conditions where multiple receptors are competing for binding at identical sites.

Progestin regulated miRNAs that mediate progesterone receptor action in breast cancer

Progesterone receptors (PRs) mediate response to progestins in the normal breast and breast cancer. To determine if liganded PR regulate microRNAs (miRNAs) as a component of their action, we profiled mature miRNA levels following progestin treatment. Indeed, 28 miRNAs are significantly altered by 6h of progestin treatment. Many progestin-responsive genes are putative targets of progestin-regulated miRNAs; for example, progestin treatment decreases miR-29, thereby relieving repression of one of its direct targets, the gene encoding ATPase, Na(+)/K(+) transporting, beta 1 polypeptide (ATP1B1). Thus, liganded PR regulates ATP1B1 through sites in the promoter and the 3'UTR, to achieve maximal tight hormonal regulation of ATP1B1 protein via both transcriptional and translational control. We find that ATP1B1 serves to limit migration and invasion in breast cancer cells. Lastly, we demonstrate that PR itself is regulated by a progestin-upregulated miRNA, miR-513a-5p, providing a novel mechanism for tight control of PR protein expression.

Structural and functional analysis of domains of the progesterone receptor

Steroid hormone receptors are multi-domain proteins composed of conserved well-structured regions, such as ligand (LBD) and DNA binding domains (DBD), plus other naturally unstructured regions including the amino-terminal domain (NTD) and the hinge region between the LBD and DBD. The hinge is more than just a flexible region between the DBD and LBD and is capable of binding co-regulatory proteins and the minor groove of DNA flanking hormone response elements. Because the hinge can directly participate in DNA binding it has also been termed the carboxyl terminal extension (CTE) of the DNA binding domain. The CTE and NTD are dynamic regions of the receptor that can adopt multiple conformations depending on the environment of interacting proteins and DNA. Both regions have important regulatory roles for multiple receptor functions that are related to the ability of the CTE and NTD to form multiple active conformations. This review focuses on studies of the CTE and NTD of progesterone receptor (PR), as well as related work with other steroid/nuclear receptors.

Thermodynamic dissection of estrogen receptor-promoter interactions reveals that steroid receptors differentially partition their self-association and promoter binding energetics

Steroid receptors define a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent work has demonstrated that the receptors regulate distinct but overlapping gene networks, yet the mechanisms by which they do so remain unclear. We previously determined the microscopic binding energetics for progesterone receptor (PR) isoform assembly at promoters containing multiple response elements. We found that the two isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) share nearly identical dimerization and intrinsic DNA binding free energies but maintain large differences in cooperative free energy. Moreover, cooperativity can be modulated by monovalent ion binding and promoter layout, suggesting that differences in cooperativity might control isoform-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor function. To determine whether cooperative binding energetics are common to other members of the steroid receptor family, we dissected the thermodynamics of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α):promoter interactions. We find that the ER-α intrinsic DNA binding free energy is identical to that of the PR isoforms. This was expected, noting that receptor DNA binding domains are highly conserved. Unexpectedly, ER-α generates negligible cooperativity-orders of magnitude less than predicted based on our studies of the PR isoforms. However, analysis of the cooperativity term suggests that it reflects a balance between highly favorable cooperative stabilization and unfavorable promoter bending. Moreover, ER-α cooperative free energy is compensated for by a large increase in dimerization free energy. Collectively, the results demonstrate that steroid receptors differentially partition not only cooperative energetics but also dimerization energetics. We speculate that this ability serves as a framework for regulating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor-specific gene regulation.

Dissecting the linkage between transcription factor self-assembly and site-specific DNA binding: the role of the analytical ultracentrifuge

A long-standing goal of biomedical research has been to determine the quantitative mechanisms responsible for gene regulation and transcriptional activation. These events occur through numerous protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions, many of which are allosterically coupled. For systems where highly purified protein is available, analytical ultracentrifugation provides a means to study these linked reactions, allosteric or otherwise. Sedimentation velocity is an ultracentrifugation technique that provides rigorous insight into protein self-association, homogeneity, and gross structure. Because self-association is often in dynamic equilibrium with other reactions such as DNA binding, an explicit and independent analysis of each interaction is critical to revealing mechanism. This chapter details a protocol for using sedimentation velocity to dissect the linkage between transcription factor self-association and site-specific DNA binding.

Juvenile hormone action through a defined enhancer motif to modulate ecdysteroid-activation of natural core promoters

We have established a model system of hormone action, in an Sf9 cell transfection system, using defined enhancer motifs and natural core promoters of metamorphosis-associated genes. The DR1 enhancer, that is an established DNA binding site for the ecdysone receptor/ultraspiracle heterodimer, was necessary for transcriptional activation by 20-OH ecdysone. For this activated transcription, a natural sequence closely 5' to the TATA box is necessary. Cotreatment with juvenile hormone III strongly suppressed the steroid activation of transcription. However, in the absence of the sequence located closely 5' to the TATA box, cotreatment with juvenile hormone instead increased transcription over that occurring due to 20-hydroxy-ecdysone alone. This sensitivity to activation by cotreatment with juvenile hormone could be transferred to a related, but otherwise unresponsive, hexamerin core promoter simply by transferring to the unresponsive promoter the five base transcription start site (ACAGT) from the responsive hexamerin gene. These are the first reports that the direction of JH action on 20-OH ecdysone-activated transcription can be reversed by removal of a sequence at the core promoter, and that modulatory action of juvenile hormone can be transferred to a different gene by transferring the transcription start site motif.

From steroid receptors to cytokines: the thermodynamics of self-associating systems

Since 1987, the Gibbs Conference on Biothermodynamics has maintained a focus on understanding the quantitative aspects of gene regulatory systems. These studies coupled rigorous techniques with exact theory to dissect the linked reactions associated with bacterial and lower eukaryotic gene regulation. However, only in the last ten years has it become possible to apply this approach to clinically relevant, human gene regulatory systems. Here we summarize our work on the thermodynamics of human steroid receptors and their interactions with multi-site promoter sequences, highlighting results not available from more traditional biochemical and structural approaches. Noting that the Gibbs Conference has also served as a vehicle to promote the broader use of thermodynamics in understanding biology, we then discuss collaborative work on the hydrodynamics of a cytokine implicated in tumor suppression, prostate derived factor (PDF).

Na(+) and K(+) allosterically regulate cooperative DNA binding by the human progesterone receptor

Cooperativity is a common mechanism used by transcription factors to generate highly responsive yet stable gene regulation. For the two isoforms of human progesterone receptor (PR-A and PR-B), differences in cooperative DNA binding energetics may account for their differing transcriptional activation properties. Here we report on the molecular origins responsible for cooperativity, finding that it can be activated or repressed with Na(+) and K(+), respectively. We demonstrate that PR self-association and DNA-dependent cooperativity are linked to a monovalent cation binding event and that this binding is coupled to modulation of receptor structure. K(+) and Na(+) are therefore allosteric effectors of PR function. Noting that the apparent binding affinities of Na(+) and K(+) are comparable to their intracellular concentrations and that PR isoforms directly regulate the genes of a number of ion pumps and channels, these results suggest that Na(+) and K(+) may additionally function as physiological regulators of PR action.

Mechanism of strand-specific smooth muscle alpha-actin enhancer interaction by purine-rich element binding protein B (Purbeta)

Expression of the smooth muscle alpha-actin gene in growth-activated vascular smooth muscle cells and stromal fibroblasts is negatively regulated by members of the Pur family of single-stranded DNA/RNA-binding proteins. In particular, Puralpha and Purbeta are postulated to repress transcription by forming helix-destabilizing complexes with the sense strand of an asymmetric polypurine-polypyrimidine tract containing a canonical MCAT enhancer motif in the 5' region of the gene. Herein, we establish the mechanism of Purbeta binding to the purine-rich strand of the enhancer using quantitative methods and purified components. Initial evaluation of DNA-binding specificity and equilibrium stoichiometry via colorimetric-, autoradiographic-, and fluorescence-based assays suggested that Purbeta interacts with two distinct G/A-rich sites within the nominal single-stranded enhancer element to form a high-affinity 2:1 protein:DNA complex. Statistical mechanical analyses of band shift titrations of the nominal element in conjunction with DNase I footprint titrations of the extended smooth muscle alpha-actin 5'-flanking region demonstrated that assembly of the nucleoprotein complex likely occurs in a sequential, cooperative, and monomer-dependent fashion. Resolution of the microscopic energetics of the system indicated that monomer association with two nonidentical sites flanking the core MCAT motif accounts for the majority of the intrinsic binding affinity of Purbeta with intersite cooperativity contributing an approximately 12-fold increase to the stability of the nucleoprotein complex. These findings offer new insights into the mechanism, energetics, and sequence determinants of Purbeta repressor binding to a biologically relevant, contractile phenotype-regulating cis-element while also revealing the thermodynamic confines of putative Purbeta-mediated effects on DNA structure.

Using thermodynamics to understand progesterone receptor function: method and theory

Progesterone receptors (PRs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors. The mechanisms by which receptors such as PR assemble at a promoter and recruit coactivators are well understood at the biochemical level. However, a rigorous and thus quantitatively predictive understanding of function is entirely lacking. This is so in part because the study of receptor function has largely been carried out using semiquantitative or qualitative approaches. These types of analyses are limited in their ability to resolve thermodynamically valid and physically meaningful microscopic interaction parameters. This includes resolution of intrinsic binding constants and cooperativity terms, as well as the mathematical framework for integrating these values into a larger molecular code for function. Here we present our experimental and theoretical approach for dissecting the linked reactions associated with PR and coactivator assembly at complex promoter sequences. We discuss the use of analytical ultracentrifugation and quantitative DNase footprint titration and their coupling to exact theoretical treatments. We then highlight the major findings of these studies and their implications for understanding and reevaluating receptor function.

Mechanisms underlying the control of progesterone receptor transcriptional activity by SUMOylation

Posttranslational modification by small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) is a major regulator of transcription. We previously showed that progesterone receptors (PR) have a single consensus psiKXE SUMO-conjugation motif centered at Lys-388 in the N-terminal domain of PR-B and a homologous site of PR-A. SUMOylation of the PR is hormone-dependent and has a suppressive effect on transcription of an exogenous promoter. Here we show that repression of PR activity by SUMOylation at Lys-388 is uncoupled from phosphorylation, involves synergy between tandem progesterone response elements, and is associated with lowered ligand sensitivity and slowed ligand-dependent down-regulation. However, paradoxically, cellular overexpression of SUMO-1 increases PR transcriptional activity even if Lys-388 is mutated, suggesting that the receptors are activated indirectly by other SUMOylated proteins. One of these is the coactivator SRC-1, whose binding to PR and enhancement of agonist-dependent N-/C-terminal interactions is augmented by the presence of SUMO-1. Increased transcription due to SRC-1 is independent of PR SUMOylation based on assays with the Lys-388 mutants and the pure antiprogestin ZK98299, which blocks N-/C-terminal interactions. In summary, SUMOylation tightly regulates the transcriptional activity of PR by repressing the receptors directly while activating them indirectly through augmented SRC-1 coactivation.

Non-genomic progesterone actions in female reproduction

BACKGROUND

The steroid hormone progesterone is indispensable for mammalian procreation by controlling key female reproductive events that range from ovulation to implantation, maintenance of pregnancy and breast development. In addition to activating the progesterone receptors (PRs)-B and -A, members of the superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors, progesterone also elicits a variety of rapid signalling events independently of transcriptional or genomic regulation. This review covers our current knowledge on the mechanisms and relevance of non-genomic progesterone signalling in female reproduction.

METHODS

PubMed was searched up to August 2008 for papers on progesterone actions in ovary/breast/endometrium/myometrium/brain, focusing primarily on non-genomic signalling mechanisms.

RESULTS

Convergence and intertwining of rapid non-genomic events and the slower transcriptional actions critically determine the functional response to progesterone in the female reproductive system in a cell-type- and environment-specific manner. Several putative progesterone-binding moieties have been implicated in rapid signalling events, including the 'classical' PR and its variants, progesterone receptor membrane component 1, and the novel family of membrane progestin receptors. Progesterone and its metabolites have also been implicated in the allosteric regulation of several unrelated receptors, such as gamma-aminobutyric acid type A, oxytocin and sigma(1) receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Identification of the mechanisms and receptors that relay rapid progesterone signalling is an area of research fraught with difficulties and controversy. More in-depth characterization of the putative receptors is required before the non-genomic progesterone pathway in normal and pathological reproductive function can be targeted for pharmacological intervention.

Quantitative DNase footprint titration: a tool for analyzing the energetics of protein-DNA interactions

A major goal in biomedical research is to determine the mechanisms responsible for gene regulation. However, the promoters and operators that control transcription are often complex in nature, containing multiple-binding sites with which DNA-binding proteins can interact cooperatively. Quantitative DNase footprint titration is one of the few techniques capable of resolving the microscopic binding affinities responsible for the macroscopic assembly process. Here, we present a step-by-step protocol for carrying out a footprint titration experiment. We then describe how to quantify the resultant images to generate individual-site binding curves. Finally, we derive basic equations for binding at each site and present an overview of the fitting process, applying it to the anticipated results. Users should anticipate that the footprinting experiment will take 3-5 d starting from DNA template isolation to image acquisition and quantitation.

Thermodynamic dissection of progesterone receptor interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter: monomer binding and strong cooperativity dominate the assembly reaction

Progesterone receptors (PRs) play critical roles in eukaryotic gene regulation, yet the mechanisms by which they assemble at their promoters are poorly understood. One of the few promoters amenable to analysis is the mouse mammary tumor virus gene regulatory sequence. Embedded within this sequence are four progesterone response elements (PREs) corresponding to a palindromic PRE and three half-site PREs. Early mutational studies indicated that the presence of all four sites generated a synergistic and strong transcriptional response. However, DNA binding analyses suggested that receptor assembly at the promoter occurred in the absence of significant cooperativity. Taken together, the results indicated that cooperative interactions among PREs could not account for the observed functional synergy. More broadly, the studies raised the question of whether cooperativity was a common feature of PR-mediated gene regulation. As a step toward obtaining a quantitative and, thus, predictive understanding of receptor function, we have carried out a thermodynamic dissection of PR A-isoform interactions at the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter. Utilizing analytical ultracentrifugation and quantitative footprinting, we have resolved the microscopic energetics of PR A-isoform binding, including cooperativity terms. Our results reveal a model contrary to that inferred from previous biochemical investigations. Specifically, the binding unit at a half-site is not a receptor dimer but is instead a monomer; monomers bound at half-sites are capable of significant pairwise cooperative interactions; occupancy of all three half-sites is required to cooperatively engage the palindromic-bound dimer; and finally, large unfavorable forces accompany assembly. Overall, monomer binding accounts for the majority of the intrinsic binding energetics and cooperativity contributes an approximately 1000-fold increase in receptor-promoter stability. Finally, the partitioning of cooperativity suggests a framework for interpreting in vivo transcriptional synergy. These results highlight the insight available from rigorous analysis and demonstrate that receptor-promoter interactions are considerably more complex than typically envisioned.

Linked equilibria in regulation of transcription initiation

Assembly of transcriptional regulatory complexes often involves multiple binding processes and these binding processes are frequently coupled to one another. Small molecule binding can promote or inhibit DNA-binding or protein-protein interactions. DNA binding may be coupled to protein association. Finally, proteins may bind cooperatively to multiple sites in a transcriptional regulatory region. The level of transcription initiation at a promoter reflects the assembly of regulatory complexes in a transcription control region. Quantitative mechanistic understanding of regulatory complex assembly requires dissection of the assembly process into its constituent interactions followed by measurements of linkage between the individual binding processes. Methods and approaches to achieving this quantitative understanding of transcription regulation are outlined in this chapter.

Nuclear receptor structure: implications for function

Small lipophilic molecules such as steroidal hormones, retinoids, and free fatty acids control many of the reproductive, developmental, and metabolic processes in eukaryotes. The mediators of these effects are nuclear receptor proteins, ligand-activated transcription factors capable of regulating the expression of complex gene networks. This review addresses the structure and structural properties of nuclear receptors, focusing on the well-studied ligand-binding and DNA-binding domains as well as our still-emerging understanding of the largely unstructured N-terminal regions. To emphasize the allosteric interdependence among these subunits, a more detailed inspection of the structural properties of the human progesterone receptor is presented. Finally, this work is placed in the context of developing a quantitative and mechanistic understanding of nuclear receptor function.

Thermodynamic analysis of progesterone receptor-promoter interactions reveals a molecular model for isoform-specific function

Human progesterone receptors (PR) exist as two functionally distinct isoforms, PR-A and PR-B. The proteins are identical except for an additional 164 residues located at the N terminus of PR-B. To determine the mechanisms responsible for isoform-specific functional differences, we present here a thermodynamic dissection of PR-A-promoter interactions and compare the results to our previous work on PR-B. This analysis has generated a number of results inconsistent with the traditional, biochemically based model of receptor function. Specifically, statistical models invoking preformed PR-A dimers as the active binding species demonstrate that intrinsic binding energetics are over an order of magnitude greater than is apparent. High-affinity binding is opposed, however, by a large energetic penalty. The consequences of this penalty are 2-fold: Successive monomer binding to a palindromic response element is thermodynamically favored over preformed dimer binding, and DNA-induced dimerization of the monomers is largely abolished. Furthermore, PR-A binding to multiple PREs is only weakly cooperative, as judged by a 5-fold increase in overall stability. Comparison of these results to our work on PR-B demonstrates that whereas both isoforms appear to have similar DNA binding affinities, PR-B in fact has a greatly increased intrinsic binding affinity and cooperative binding ability relative to PR-A. These differences thus suggest that residues unique to PR-B allosterically regulate the energetics of cooperative promoter assembly. From a functional perspective, the differences in microscopic affinities predict receptor-promoter occupancies that accurately correlate with the transcriptional activation profiles seen for each isoform.