Miniature protein ligands for EVH1 domains: interplay between affinity, specificity, and cell motility

Understanding binding affinity and specificity of modular protein domains: A focus in ligand design for the polyproline-binding families

Within the modular protein domains there are five families that recognize proline-rich sequences: SH3, WW, EVH1, GYF and UEV domains. This chapter reviews the main strategies developed for the design of ligands for these families, including peptides, peptidomimetics and drugs. We also describe some studies aimed to understand the molecular reasons responsible for the intrinsic affinity and specificity of these domains.

A distributed residue network permits conformational binding specificity in a conserved family of actin remodelers

Metazoan proteomes contain many paralogous proteins that have evolved distinct functions. The Ena/VASP family of actin regulators consists of three members that share an EVH1 interaction domain with a 100 % conserved binding site. A proteome-wide screen revealed photoreceptor cilium actin regulator (PCARE) as a high-affinity ligand for ENAH EVH1. Here, we report the surprising observation that PCARE is ~100-fold specific for ENAH over paralogs VASP and EVL and can selectively bind ENAH and inhibit ENAH-dependent adhesion in cells. Specificity arises from a mechanism whereby PCARE stabilizes a conformation of the ENAH EVH1 domain that is inaccessible to family members VASP and EVL. Structure-based modeling rapidly identified seven residues distributed throughout EVL that are sufficient to differentiate binding by ENAH vs. EVL. By exploiting the ENAH-specific conformation, we rationally designed the tightest and most selective ENAH binder to date. Our work uncovers a conformational mechanism of interaction specificity that distinguishes highly similar paralogs and establishes tools for dissecting specific Ena/VASP functions in processes including cancer cell invasion.

The COOH-Terminal Proline-Rich Region of GRP78 Is a Key Regulator of Its Cell Surface Expression and Viability of Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells

Translocation of 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78) from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to plasma membrane represents a paradigm shift beyond its traditional function as an ER chaperone protein. Cell surface GRP78 (csGRP78) exerts novel signaling functions, and mechanisms underlying its cell surface expression are just emerging. Acquired tamoxifen resistance of breast cancer cells is accompanied with elevated level of csGRP78. Therefore, the tamoxifen-resistant MCF7 breast cancer cells (MCF7-LR) represents a clinically relevant model to study mechanisms of csGRP78 expression. We discovered that a proline-rich region (PRR) containing three consecutive prolines close to the COOH-terminus of GRP78 is important for its ability to form a complex with the partner protein, CD44v, as demonstrated by in vitro glutathione S-transferase pull-down assay. Proline to alanine mutations at the PRR compromised GRP78 expression level on the cell surface as evidenced by purification of biotinylated cell surface proteins. Reconstitution of MCF7-LR cells with the PRR mutant after knockdown of endogenous GRP78 diminished the capacity of GRP78 to stimulate STAT3 activation. The enforced expression of a short peptide bearing the PRR region of GRP78 led to reduction of CD44v and Cyclin D1 protein levels as well as cell viability, accompanied with increase in apoptotic signaling including cleaved Caspase-3 and PARP. These findings suggest that the COOH-terminal PRR of GRP78 is critical for its interaction with CD44v as well as its cell surface expression, and enforced expression of the short peptide bearing the PRR region may provide a new approach to lower the viability of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells.

A modular toolkit to inhibit proline-rich motif-mediated protein-protein interactions

Small-molecule competitors of protein-protein interactions are urgently needed for functional analysis of large-scale genomics and proteomics data. Particularly abundant, yet so far undruggable, targets include domains specialized in recognizing proline-rich segments, including Src-homology 3 (SH3), WW, GYF, and Drosophila enabled (Ena)/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) homology 1 (EVH1) domains. Here, we present a modular strategy to obtain an extendable toolkit of chemical fragments (ProMs) designed to replace pairs of conserved prolines in recognition motifs. As proof-of-principle, we developed a small, selective, peptidomimetic inhibitor of Ena/VASP EVH1 domain interactions. Highly invasive MDA MB 231 breast-cancer cells treated with this ligand showed displacement of VASP from focal adhesions, as well as from the front of lamellipodia, and strongly reduced cell invasion. General applicability of our strategy is illustrated by the design of an ErbB4-derived ligand containing two ProM-1 fragments, targeting the yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1)-WW domain with a fivefold higher affinity.

Enabled negatively regulates diaphanous-driven actin dynamics in vitro and in vivo

Actin regulators facilitate cell migration by controlling cell protrusion architecture and dynamics. As the behavior of individual actin regulators becomes clear, we must address why cells require multiple regulators with similar functions and how they cooperate to create diverse protrusions. We characterized Diaphanous (Dia) and Enabled (Ena) as a model, using complementary approaches: cell culture, biophysical analysis, and Drosophila morphogenesis. We found that Dia and Ena have distinct biochemical properties that contribute to the different protrusion morphologies each induces. Dia is a more processive, faster elongator, paralleling the long, stable filopodia it induces in vivo, while Ena promotes filopodia with more dynamic changes in number, length, and lifetime. Acting together, Ena and Dia induce protrusions distinct from those induced by either alone, with Ena reducing Dia-driven protrusion length and number. Consistent with this, EnaEVH1 binds Dia directly and inhibits DiaFH1FH2-mediated nucleation in vitro. Finally, Ena rescues hemocyte migration defects caused by activated Dia.

•

Dia and Ena differ biochemically, promoting distinct filopodia dynamics

•

Dia and Ena colocalization negatively regulates filopodia

•

Ena’s EVH1 binds Dia’s FH1 and reduces Dia-driven filopodia and actin nucleation

•

Ena rescues DiaΔDAD inhibition of hemocyte migration speed to wounds in vivo

The solution structure of pGolemi, a high affinity Mena EVH1 binding miniature protein, suggests explanations for paralog-specific binding to Ena/VASP homology (EVH) 1 domains

Ena/VASP homology 1 (EVH1) domains are polyproline binding domains that are present in a wide range of adaptor proteins, among them Ena/VASP proteins involved in actin remodeling and axonal guidance. The interaction of ActA, a transmembrane protein from the food-borne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes, with EVH1 domains has been shown to be crucial for recruitment of the host's actin skeleton and, as a consequence, for the infectivity of this bacterium. We present the structure of a synthetic high-affinity Mena EVH1 ligand, pGolemi, capable of paralog-specific binding, solved by NMR spectroscopy. This peptide shares the common pancreatic peptide fold with its scaffold, avian pancreatic peptide, but shows pivotal differences in the amino-terminus. The interplay of spatial fixation and flexibility appears to be the reason for its high affinity towards Mena EVH1. Combined with earlier investigations, our structural data shed light on the specificity determinants of pGolemi and the importance of additional binding epitopes around the residues Thr74 and Phe32 on EVH1 domains regulating paralog specificity. Our results are expected to facilitate the design of other high-affinity, paralog-specific EVH1 domain ligands, and serve as a fundament for the investigation of the molecular mode of action of EVH1 domains.

Targeting protein–protein interactions for therapeutic intervention: a challenge for the future

Background: Over the last two decades, an increasing research effort in academia and industry has focused on the modulation (both inhibition and stabilization) of protein–protein interactions (PPIs) in order to develop novel therapeutic approaches and target-selective agents in drug discovery. Discussion: The diversity and complexity of highly dynamic systems such as PPIs present many challenges for the identification of drug-like molecules with the ability to modulate the PPI with the necessary selectivity and potency. In this review, a number of these strategies will be presented along with a critical overview of the challenges and potential solutions relating to the exploitation of PPIs as molecular targets. Conclusions: Both traditional drug discovery approaches and some more recently developed innovative strategies have already provided valuable tools for the discovery of PPI modulators, and a number of successful examples have highlighted the potential of targeting PPIs for therapeutic intervention, especially in the oncology area.