Protein phosphorylation chain of a Bacillus subtilis fructose-specific phosphotransferase system and its participation in regulation of the expression of the lev operon

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system: regulation by protein phosphorylation and phosphorylation-dependent protein-protein interactions

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) carries out both catalytic and regulatory functions. It catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of a variety of sugars and sugar derivatives but also carries out numerous regulatory functions related to carbon, nitrogen, and phosphate metabolism, to chemotaxis, to potassium transport, and to the virulence of certain pathogens. For these different regulatory processes, the signal is provided by the phosphorylation state of the PTS components, which varies according to the availability of PTS substrates and the metabolic state of the cell. PEP acts as phosphoryl donor for enzyme I (EI), which, together with HPr and one of several EIIA and EIIB pairs, forms a phosphorylation cascade which allows phosphorylation of the cognate carbohydrate bound to the membrane-spanning EIIC. HPr of firmicutes and numerous proteobacteria is also phosphorylated in an ATP-dependent reaction catalyzed by the bifunctional HPr kinase/phosphorylase. PTS-mediated regulatory mechanisms are based either on direct phosphorylation of the target protein or on phosphorylation-dependent interactions. For regulation by PTS-mediated phosphorylation, the target proteins either acquired a PTS domain by fusing it to their N or C termini or integrated a specific, conserved PTS regulation domain (PRD) or, alternatively, developed their own specific sites for PTS-mediated phosphorylation. Protein-protein interactions can occur with either phosphorylated or unphosphorylated PTS components and can either stimulate or inhibit the function of the target proteins. This large variety of signal transduction mechanisms allows the PTS to regulate numerous proteins and to form a vast regulatory network responding to the phosphorylation state of various PTS components.

Regulation of Lactobacillus casei sorbitol utilization genes requires DNA-binding transcriptional activator GutR and the conserved protein GutM

Sequence analysis of the five genes (gutRMCBA) downstream from the previously described sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-encoding Lactobacillus casei gutF gene revealed that they constitute a sorbitol (glucitol) utilization operon. The gutRM genes encode putative regulators, while the gutCBA genes encode the EIIC, EIIBC, and EIIA proteins of a phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent sorbitol phosphotransferase system (PTS(Gut)). The gut operon is transcribed as a polycistronic gutFRMCBA messenger, the expression of which is induced by sorbitol and repressed by glucose. gutR encodes a transcriptional regulator with two PTS-regulated domains, a galactitol-specific EIIB-like domain (EIIB(Gat) domain) and a mannitol/fructose-specific EIIA-like domain (EIIA(Mtl) domain). Its inactivation abolished gut operon transcription and sorbitol uptake, indicating that it acts as a transcriptional activator. In contrast, cells carrying a gutB mutation expressed the gut operon constitutively, but they failed to transport sorbitol, indicating that EIIBC(Gut) negatively regulates GutR. A footprint analysis showed that GutR binds to a 35-bp sequence upstream from the gut promoter. A sequence comparison with the presumed promoter region of gut operons from various firmicutes revealed a GutR consensus motif that includes an inverted repeat. The regulation mechanism of the L. casei gut operon is therefore likely to be operative in other firmicutes. Finally, gutM codes for a conserved protein of unknown function present in all sequenced gut operons. A gutM mutant, the first constructed in a firmicute, showed drastically reduced gut operon expression and sorbitol uptake, indicating a regulatory role also for GutM.

How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria

The phosphoenolpyruvate(PEP):carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PTS) is found only in bacteria, where it catalyzes the transport and phosphorylation of numerous monosaccharides, disaccharides, amino sugars, polyols, and other sugar derivatives. To carry out its catalytic function in sugar transport and phosphorylation, the PTS uses PEP as an energy source and phosphoryl donor. The phosphoryl group of PEP is usually transferred via four distinct proteins (domains) to the transported sugar bound to the respective membrane component(s) (EIIC and EIID) of the PTS. The organization of the PTS as a four-step phosphoryl transfer system, in which all P derivatives exhibit similar energy (phosphorylation occurs at histidyl or cysteyl residues), is surprising, as a single protein (or domain) coupling energy transfer and sugar phosphorylation would be sufficient for PTS function. A possible explanation for the complexity of the PTS was provided by the discovery that the PTS also carries out numerous regulatory functions. Depending on their phosphorylation state, the four proteins (domains) forming the PTS phosphorylation cascade (EI, HPr, EIIA, and EIIB) can phosphorylate or interact with numerous non-PTS proteins and thereby regulate their activity. In addition, in certain bacteria, one of the PTS components (HPr) is phosphorylated by ATP at a seryl residue, which increases the complexity of PTS-mediated regulation. In this review, we try to summarize the known protein phosphorylation-related regulatory functions of the PTS. As we shall see, the PTS regulation network not only controls carbohydrate uptake and metabolism but also interferes with the utilization of nitrogen and phosphorus and the virulence of certain pathogens.

Molecular analysis of the glucose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate : sugar phosphotransferase system from Lactobacillus casei and its links with the control of sugar metabolism

Lactobacillus caseitransports glucose preferentially by a mannose-class phosphoenolpyruvate : sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS). The genomic analysis ofL. caseiallowed the authors to find a gene cluster (manLMNO) encoding the IIAB (manL), IIC (manM) and IID (manN) proteins of a mannose-class PTS, and a putative 121 aa protein of unknown function (encoded bymanO), homologues of which are also present inmanclusters that encode glucose/mannose transporters in other Gram-positive bacteria. TheL. casei manoperon is constitutively expressed into amanLMNOmessenger, but an additionalmanOtranscript was also detected. Upstream of themanoperon, two genes (upsRandupsA) were found which encode proteins resembling a transcriptional regulator and a membrane protein, respectively. Disruption of eitherupsRorupsAdid not affectmanLMNOtranscription, and had no effect on glucose uptake. Cells carrying amanOdeletion transported glucose at a rate similar to that of the wild-type strain. By contrast, amanMdisruption resulted in cells unable to transport glucose by the PTS, thus confirming the functional role of themangenes. In addition, themanMmutant exhibited neither inducer exclusion of maltose nor glucose repression. This result confirms the need for glucose transport through the PTS to trigger these regulatory processes inL. casei.

An Esterase Gene from Lactobacillus casei Cotranscribed with Genes Encoding a Phosphoenolpyruvate:Sugar Phosphotransferase System and Regulated by a LevR-Like Activator and σ54 Factor

A new esterase-encoding gene was found in the draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus casei BL23 (CECT5275). It is located in an operon together with genes encoding the EIIA, EIIB, EIIC, and EIID proteins of a mannose class phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system. After overproduction in Escherichia coli and purification, the esterase could hydrolyze acetyl sugars, hence the operon was named esu for esterase-sugar uptake genes. Upstream of the genes encoding the EII components (esuABCD) and the esterase (esuE), two genes transcribed in the opposite sense were found which encode a Bacillus subtilis LevR-like transcriptional activator (esuR) and a sigma54-like transcriptional factor (rpoN). As compared with the wild-type strain, elevated fructose phosphorylation was detected in L. casei mutants constitutively expressing the esu operon. However, none of the many sugars tested could induce the esu operon. The fact that EsuE exhibits esterase activity on acetyl sugars suggests that this operon could be involved in the uptake and metabolism of esterified sugars. Expression of the esu operon is similar to that of the B. subtilis lev operon: it contains a -12,-24 consensus promoter typical of sigma54-regulated genes, and EsuR and RpoN are essential for its transcription which is negatively regulated by EIIB(Esu). The esuABCDE transcription unit represents the first sigma54-regulated operon in lactobacilli. Furthermore, replacement of His852 in the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system regulation domain II of EsuR with Ala indicated that the transcription activator function of EsuR is inhibited by EIIB(Esu)-mediated phosphorylation at His852.

Intracellular butyryl phosphate and acetyl phosphate concentrations in Clostridium acetobutylicum and their implications for solvent formation

It has been suggested (L. H. Harris, R. P. Desai, N. E. Welker, and E. T. Papoutsakis, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 67:1-11, 2000) that butyryl phosphate (BuP) is a regulator of solventogenesis in Clostridium acetobutylicum. Here, we determined BuP and acetyl phosphate (AcP) levels in fermentations of C. acetobutylicum wild type (WT), degenerate strain M5, a butyrate kinase (buk) mutant, and a phosphotransacetylase (pta) mutant. A sensitive method was developed to measure BuP and AcP in the same sample. Compared to the WT, the buk mutant had higher levels of BuP and AcP; the BuP levels were high during the early exponential phase, and there was a peak corresponding to solvent production. Consistent with this, solvent formation was initiated significantly earlier and was much stronger in the buk mutant than in all other strains. For all strains, initiation of butanol formation corresponded to a BuP peak concentration that was more than 60 to 70 pmol/g (dry weight), and higher and sustained levels corresponded to higher butanol formation fluxes. The BuP levels never exceeded 40 to 50 pmol/g (dry weight) in strain M5, which produces no solvents. The BuP profiles were bimodal, and there was a second peak midway through solventogenesis that corresponded to carboxylic acid reutilization. AcP showed a delayed single peak during late solventogenesis corresponding to acetate reutilization. As expected, in the pta mutant the AcP levels were very low, yet this strain exhibited strong butanol production. These data suggest that BuP is a regulatory molecule that may act as a phosphodonor of transcriptional factors. DNA array-based transcriptional analysis of the buk and M5 mutants demonstrated that high BuP levels corresponded to downregulation of flagellar genes and upregulation of solvent formation and stress genes.

The Lactobacillus casei ptsHI47T mutation causes overexpression of a LevR-regulated but RpoN-independent operon encoding a mannose class phosphotransferase system

A proteome analysis of Lactobacillus casei mutants that are affected in carbon catabolite repression revealed that a 15-kDa protein was strongly overproduced in a ptsHI47T mutant. This protein was identified as EIIA of a mannose class phosphotransferase system (PTS). A 7.1-kb DNA fragment containing the EIIA-encoding open reading frame and five other genes was sequenced. The first gene encodes a protein resembling the RpoN (sigma54)-dependent Bacillus subtilis transcription activator LevR. The following pentacistronic operon is oriented in the opposite direction and encodes four proteins with strong similarity to the proteins of the B. subtilis Lev-PTS and one protein of unknown function. The genes present on the 7.1-kb DNA fragment were therefore called levR and levABCDX. The levABCDX operon was induced by fructose and mannose. No "-12, -24" promoter typical of RpoN-dependent genes precedes the L. casei lev operon, and its expression was therefore RpoN independent but required LevR. Phosphorylation of LevR by P approximately His-HPr stimulates its activity, while phosphorylation by P approximately EIIBLev inhibits it. Disruption of the EIIBLev-encoding levB gene therefore led to strong constitutive expression of the lev operon, which was weaker in a strain carrying a ptsI mutation preventing phosphorylation by both P approximately EIIBLev and P approximately His-HPr. Expression of the L. casei lev operon is also subject to P-Ser-HPr-mediated catabolite repression. The observed slow phosphoenolpyruvate- and ATP-dependent phosphorylation of HPrI47T as well as the slow phosphoryl group transfer from the mutant P approximately His-HPr to EIIALev are assumed to be responsible for the elevated expression of the lev operon in the ptsHI47T mutant.

Sites of positive and negative regulation in the Bacillus subtilis antiterminators LicT and SacY

The Bacillus subtilis homologous transcriptional antiterminators LicT and SacY control the inducible expression of genes involved in aryl beta-glucoside and sucrose utilization respectively. Their RNA-binding activity is carried by the N-terminal domain (CAT), and is regulated by two similar C-terminal domains (PRD1 and PRD2), which are the targets of phosphorylation reactions catalysed by the phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS). In the absence of the corresponding inducer, LicT is inactivated by BglP, the PTS permease (EII) specific for aryl beta-glucosides, and SacY by SacX, a negative regulator homologous to the EII specific for sucrose. LicT, but not SacY, is also subject to a positive control by the general PTS components EI and HPr, which are thought to phosphorylate LicT in the absence of carbon catabolite repression. Construction of SacY/LicT hybrids and mutational analysis enabled the location of the sites of this positive regulation at the two phosphorylatable His207 and His269 within LicT-PRD2, and suggested that the presence of negative charges at these sites is sufficient for LicT activation in vivo. The BglP-mediated inhibition process was found to essentially involve His100 of LicT-PRD1, with His159 of the same domain playing a minor role in this regulation. In vitro experiments indicated that His100 could be phosphorylated directly by the general PTS proteins, this phosphorylation being stimulated by phosphorylated BglP. We confirmed that, similarly, the corresponding conserved His99 residue in SacY is the major site of the negative control exerted by SacX on SacY activity. Thus, for both antiterminators, the EII-mediated inhibition process seems to rely primarily on the presence of a negative charge at the first conserved histidine of the PRD1.

Regulation of carbon catabolism in Bacillus species

The gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilisis capable of using numerous carbohydrates as single sources of carbon and energy. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of carbon catabolism and its regulation. Like many other bacteria, B. subtilis uses glucose as the most preferred source of carbon and energy. Expression of genes involved in catabolism of many other substrates depends on their presence (induction) and the absence of carbon sources that can be well metabolized (catabolite repression). Induction is achieved by different mechanisms, with antitermination apparently more common in B. subtilis than in other bacteria. Catabolite repression is regulated in a completely different way than in enteric bacteria. The components mediating carbon catabolite repression in B. subtilis are also found in many other gram-positive bacteria of low GC content.

The Q15H mutation enables Crh, a Bacillus subtilis HPr-like protein, to carry out some regulatory HPr functions, but does not make it an effective phosphocarrier for sugar transport

Crh of Bacillus subtilis exhibits 45% sequence identity when compared to histidine-containing protein (HPr), a phosphocarrier protein of the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP):sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS). Crh can be phosphorylated by ATP at the regulatory Ser-46 and similar to P-Ser-HPr, P-Ser-Crh plays a role in carbon-catabolite repression. The sequence around the phosphorylatable Ser-46 in Crh exhibits strong similarity to the corresponding sequence of HPr of Gram-positive and a few Gram-negative bacteria. In contrast, the catalytic His-15, the site of PEP-dependent phosphorylation in HPr, is replaced with a glutamine in Crh. When Gln-15 was exchanged for a histidyl residue, in vitro PEP-dependent enzyme I-catalysed phosphorylation of the mutant Crh was observed. However, expression of the crhQ15H mutant allele did not restore growth of a ptsH deletion strain on the PTS sugars glucose, fructose or mannitol or on the non-PTS sugar glycerol. In contrast, Q15H mutant Crh could phosphorylate the transcriptional activator LevR as well as LevD, the enzyme IIA of the fructose-specific lev-PTS, which together with enzyme I, HPr and LevE forms the phosphorylation cascade regulating induction of the lev operon via LevR. As a consequence, the constitutive expression from the lev promoter observed in a (delta)ptsH strain became inducible with fructose when the crhQ15H allele was expressed in this strain.

Regulation of the Bacillus subtilis GlcT antiterminator protein by components of the phosphotransferase system

Bacillus subtilis utilizes glucose as the preferred source of carbon and energy. The sugar is transported into the cell by a specific permease of the phosphoenolpyruvate:sugar phosphotransferase system (PTS) encoded by the ptsGHI operon. Expression of this operon is induced by glucose and requires the action of a positive transcription factor, the GlcT antiterminator protein. Glucose availability is sensed by glucose-specific enzyme II (EIIGlc), the product of ptsG. In the absence of inducer, the glucose permease negatively controls the activity of the antiterminator. The GlcT antiterminator has a modular structure. The isolated N-terminal part contains the RNA-binding protein and acts as a constitutively acting antiterminator. GlcT contains two PTS regulation domains (PRDs) at the C terminus. One (PRD-I) is the target of negative control exerted by EIIGlc. A conserved His residue (His-104 in GlcT) is involved in inactivation of GlcT in the absence of glucose. It was previously proposed that PRD-containing transcriptional antiterminators are phosphorylated and concomitantly inactivated in the absence of the substrate by their corresponding PTS permeases. The results obtained with B. subtilis glucose permease with site-specific mutations suggest, however, that the permease might modulate the phosphorylation reaction without being the phosphate donor.

Expression systems and physiological control of promoter activity in bacteria

Promoter activity in vivo is not just dependent on the performance of the regulator/promoter pair which may predominantly control transcription initiation in response to a given signal, it also relies on overimposed mechanisms that connect the activity of individual promoters to the metabolic and energetic status of the bacterial cells. Such mechanisms - which frequently become limiting for biotechnological applications involving regulated promoters - include classic (i.e. cAMP/CRP-mediated) or alternative catabolite control checks, recruitment of protein intermediates of the phosphotransferase sugar transport system, coregulation through protein-induced DNA bending and the interplay of sigma factors during various growth stages.

PRD--a protein domain involved in PTS-dependent induction and carbon catabolite repression of catabolic operons in bacteria

Several operon-specific transcriptional regulators, including antiterminators and activators, contain a duplicated conserved domain, the PTS regulation domain (PRD). These duplicated domains modify the activity of the transcriptional regulators both positively and negatively. PRD-containing regulators are very common in Gram-positive bacteria. In contrast, antiterminators controlling beta-glucoside utilization are the only functionally characterized members of this family from gram-negative bacteria. PRD-containing regulators are controlled by PTS-dependent phosphorylation with different consequences: (i) In the absence of inducer, the phosphorylated EIIB component of the sugar permease donates its phosphate to a PRD, thereby inactivating the regulator. In the presence of the substrate, the regulator is dephosphorylated, and the phosphate is transferred to the sugar, resulting in induction of the operon. (ii) In gram-positive bacteria, a novel mechanism of carbon catabolite repression mediated by PRD-containing regulators has been demonstrated. In the absence of PTS substrates, the HPr protein is phosphorylated by enzyme I at His-15. This form of HPr can, in turn, phosphorylate PRD-containing regulators and stimulate their activity. In the presence of rapidly metabolizable carbon sources, ATP-dependent phosphorylation of HPr at Ser-46 by HPr kinase inhibits phosphorylation by enzyme I, and PRD-containing regulators cannot, therefore, be stimulated and are inactive. All regulators of this family contain two copies of PRD, which are functionally specialized in either induction or catabolite repression.

Antagonistic effects of dual PTS-catalysed phosphorylation on the Bacillus subtilis transcriptional activator LevR

LevR, which controls the expression of the levoperon of Bacillus subtilis, is a regulatory protein containing an N-terminal domain similar to the NifA/NtrC transcriptional activator family and a C-terminal domain similar to the regulatory part of bacterial anti-terminators, such as BgIG and LicT. Here, we demonstrate that the activity of LevR is regulated by two phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP)-dependent phosphorylation reactions catalysed by the phosphotransferase system (PTS), a transport system for sugars, polyols and other sugar derivatives. The two general components of the PTS, enzyme I and HPr, and the two soluble, sugar-specific proteins of the lev-PTS, LevD and LevE, form a signal transduction chain allowing the PEP-dependent phosphorylation of LevR, presumably at His-869. This phosphorylation seems to inhibit LevR activity and probably regulates the induction of the lev operon. Mutants in which His-869 of LevR has been replaced with a non-phosphorylatable alanine residue exhibited constitutive expression from the lev promoter, as do levD or levE mutants. In contrast, PEP-dependent phosphorylation of LevR in the presence of only the general components of the PTS, enzyme I and HPr, regulates LevR activity positively. This phosphorylation most probably occurs at His-585. Mutants in which His-585 has been replaced with an alanine had lost stimulation of LevR activity and PEP-dependent phosphorylation by enzyme I and HPr. This second phosphorylation of LevR at His-585 is presumed to play a role in carbon catabolite repression.

Crystal structure of the IIB subunit of a fructose permease (IIBLev) from Bacillus subtilis

The bacterial phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphotransferase system (PTS) mediates both the uptake of carbohydrates across the cytoplasmic membrane and their phosphorylation. During this process, a phosphoryl group is transferred from phosphoenolpyruvate via the general PTS proteins enzyme I, HPr and the sugar-specific components IIA, IIB to the transported sugar. The crystal structure of the IIB subunit of a fructose transporter from Bacillus subtilis (IIBLev) was solved by MIRAS to a resolution of 2.9 A. IIBLev comprises 163 amino acid residues that are folded into an open, mainly parallel beta-sheet with helices packed on either face. The phosphorylation site (His15) is located on the first loop (1/A) at one of the topological switch-points of the fold. Despite different global folds, IIBLev and HPr have very similar active-site loop conformations with the active-site histidine residues located close to the N terminus of the first helix. This resemblance may be of functional importance, since both proteins exchange a phosphoryl group with the same IIA subunit. The structural basis of phosphoryl transfer from HPr to IIAMan to IIBMan was investigated by modeling of the respective transition state complexes using the known HPr and IIAMan structures and a homology model of IIBMan that was derived from the IIBLev structure. All three proteins contain a helix that appears to be suitable for stabilization of the phospho-histidine by dipole and H-bonding interactions. Smooth phosphoryl transfer from one N-cap position to the other appears feasible with a minimized transition state energy due to simultaneous interactions with the donor and the acceptor helix.

Cloning and sequencing of two enterococcal glpK genes and regulation of the encoded glycerol kinases by phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent, phosphotransferase system-catalyzed phosphorylation of a single histidyl residue

The glpK genes of Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus faecalis, encoding glycerol kinase, the key enzyme of glycerol uptake and metabolism in bacteria, have been cloned and sequenced. The translated amino acid sequences exhibit strong homology to the amino acid sequences of other bacterial glycerol kinases. After expression of the enterococcal glpK genes in Escherichia coli, both glycerol kinases were purified and were found to be phosphorylated by enzyme I and the histidine-containing protein of the phosphoenolpyruvate:glycose phosphotransferase system. Phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent phosphorylation caused a 9-fold increase in enzyme activity. The site of phosphorylation in glycerol kinase of E. casseliflavus was determined as His-232. Site-specific mutagenesis was used to replace His-232 in glycerol kinase of E. casseliflavus with an alanyl, glutamate, or arginyl residue. The mutant proteins could no longer be phosphorylated confirming that His-232 of E. casseliflavus glycerol kinase represents the site of phosphorylation. The His232 --> Arg glycerol kinase exhibited an about 3-fold elevated activity compared with wild-type glycerol kinase. Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate was found to inhibit E. casseliflavus glycerol kinase activity. However, neither EIIAGlc from E. coli nor the EIIAGlc domain of Bacillus subtilis had an inhibitory effect on glycerol kinase of E. casseliflavus.