17 alpha (haloacetamidoalkyl) estradiols alkylate the human estrogen receptor at cysteine residues 417 and 530

Covalent ligands of nuclear receptors

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-induced transcriptional factors implicated in several physiological pathways. Naïve ligands bind to their cognate receptors and modulate gene expression as agonists or antagonists. It has been observed that some ligands bind via covalent bonding with the NR Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) residues. While many such instances have been known since the 1980s, a consolidated account of these ligands and their interactions with NR-LBD is yet to be documented. To negate this, we have culled out the human NR-LBDs that form a covalent attachment with ligands. According to the study, 16 of the 48 human NRs have been targeted by covalent ligands. It was found that conserved cysteines prone to covalent attachment are predominantly located in NR-LBD helices 3 and 11. These conserved cysteines are also observed in many of the remaining NRs, which can be probed for their reactivity. Thus, the structural insights into NR-LBD interactions with covalent ligands presented here would aid drug discovery efforts targeting NRs.

S-Glutathionylation of estrogen receptor α affects dendritic cell function

Glutathione S-transferase Pi (GSTP) is a thiolase that catalyzes the addition of glutathione (GSH) to receptive cysteines in target proteins, producing an S-glutathionylated residue. Accordingly, previous studies have reported that S-glutathionylation is constitutively decreased in cells from mice lacking GSTP (Gstp1/p2^-/-). Here, we found that bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDDCs) from Gstp1/p2^-/- mice have proliferation rates that are greater than those in their WT counterparts (Gstp1/p2^+/+). Moreover, Gstp1/p2^-/- BMDDCs had increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and decreased GSH:glutathione disulfide (GSSG) ratios. Estrogen receptor α (ERα) is linked to myeloproliferation and differentiation, and we observed that its steady-state levels are elevated in Gstp1/p2^-/- BMDDCs, indicating a link between GSTP and ERα activities. BMDDCs differentiated by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor had elevated ERα levels, which were more pronounced in Gstp1/p2^-/- than WT mice. When stimulated with lipopolysaccharide for maturation, Gstp1/p2^-/- BMDDCs exhibited augmented endocytosis, maturation rate, cytokine secretion, and T-cell activation; heightened glucose uptake and glycolysis; increased Akt signaling (in the mTOR pathway); and decreased AMPK-mediated phosphorylation of proteins. Of note, GSTP formed a complex with ERα, stimulating ERα S-glutathionylation at cysteines 221, 245, 417, and 447; altering ERα's binding affinity for estradiol; and reducing overall binding potential (receptor density and affinity) 3-fold. Moreover, in Gstp1/p2^-/- BMDDCs, ERα S-glutathionylation was constitutively decreased. Taken together, these findings suggest that GSTP-mediated S-glutathionylation of ERα controls BMDDC differentiation and affects metabolic function in dendritic cells.

Comparative methods for analysis of protein covalent modification by electrophilic quinoids formed from xenobiotics

Conjugation of biotin and fluorophore tags is useful for assaying covalent protein modification. Oxidative bioactivation of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) yields reactive quinoid electrophiles that covalently modify proteins, and bioactivation is associated with carcinogenic and chemopreventive effects. Identification of the protein targets of electrophilic metabolites is of general importance for xenobiotics. Four methodologies using SERM derivatized biotin/fluorophore tags were compared for purification and quantification: (1) covert oxidatively activated tags (COATags; SERM conjugated to biotin); (2) dansylTags (SERM conjugated to fluorophore); and azidoTags (SERM azide derivatives) in a two-step conjugation to biotin, using either (3) Staudinger ligation or (4) click chemistry. All synthetic derivatives retained the estrogen receptor ligand characteristics of the parent SERMs. Model proteins with bioactivation by tyrosinase in buffer or cell lysates and liver proteins with in situ bioactivation in rat primary hepatocytes were studied by immunoassay and fluorescence. Comparison showed that the azidoTag/Staudinger method was sensitive but nonspecific, the azidoTag/click methodology had low sensitivity, and the dansylTag methodology failed to detect modified proteins in hepatocytes. The COATag methodology was judged superior, detecting 5 ng of modified protein in vitro and identifying protein targets in hepatocytes. In metabolism studies in rat liver microsomes, the azide group was metabolically labile, which was a contributing factor in not selecting the azidoTag methodology in the oxidative environments required for bioactivation. For study of the protein targets of electrophilic metabolites formed by in situ oxidative bioactivation, the COATag is both sensitive and specific and does not appear to suffer from poor cell permeability.

Structure-function relationship of estrogen receptor alpha and beta: impact on human health

17Beta-estradiol (E2) controls many aspects of human physiology, including development, reproduction and homeostasis, through regulation of the transcriptional activity of its cognate receptors (ERs). The crystal structures of ERs with agonists and antagonists and the use of transgenic animals have revealed much about how hormone binding influences ER conformation(s) and how this conformation(s), in turn, influences the interaction of ERs with co-activators or co-repressors and hence determines ER binding to DNA and cellular outcomes. This information has helped to shed light on the connection between E2 and the development or progression of numerous diseases. Current therapeutic strategy in the treatment of E2-related pathologies relies on the modulation of ER trancriptional activity by anti-estrogens; however, data accumulated during the last five years reveal that ER activities are not only restricted to the nucleus. ERs are very mobile proteins continuously shuttling between protein targets located within various cellular compartments (e.g., membrane, nucleus). This allows E2 to generate different and synergic signal transduction pathways (i.e., non-genomic and genomic) which provide plasticity for cell response to E2. Understanding the structural basis and the molecular mechanisms by which ER transduce E2 signals in target cells will allow to create new pharmacologic therapies aimed at the treatment of a variety of human diseases affecting the cardiovascular system, the reproductive system, the skeletal system, the nervous system, the mammary gland, and many others.

Mass spectrometry identification of covalent attachment sites of two related estrogenic ligands on human estrogen receptor alpha

A purified preparation of human estrogen receptor alpha (hERalpha) ligand-binding domain (LBD) involving mainly the Ser(309)Ala(569) (approximately 30%) and Ser(309)Ala(571) (approximately 63%) ER portions was used to identify the covalent attachment sites of two closely related estrogenic ER affinity labels 17alpha-bromoacetamidopropylestradiol (17BAPE(2)) and 17alpha-bromoacetamidomethylestradiol (17BAME(2)). To identify and quantify the electrophile covalent attachment sites, [(14)C]17BAPE(2)- and [(14)C]17BAME(2)-alkylated hLBD preparations were trypsinized and submitted to HPLC. In each case, two radioactive fractions were obtained. Mass spectrometry analyses of the two fractions showed signals, which closely matched the molecular masses of alkylated Cys(530)Lys(531) and Cys(417)Arg(434) hLBD tryptic peptides. The covalent attachment of the two electrophiles on hLBD was assigned to the S atoms of Cys(530) and Cys(417). However, the balance between Cys(530) and Cys(417) labeling markedly differed according to the affinity label used, with the Cys(530)/Cys(417) ratio being 2.1 for 17BAPE(2), and 20 for 17BAME(2). We attempted to interpret the covalent attachment of electrophiles by molecular modeling using the crystallographic structure of LBD bound to E(2). In agreement with the different levels of Cys(417) alkylation, the LBD model with unchanged helices could not easily account for Cys(417) labeling by 17BAME(2), whereas favorable results were obtained through 17BAPE(2) docking. Moreover, labeling at Cys(530) by the two electrophiles could not be interpreted using the LBD model. This indicates that some states of solute LBD bound to the estrogenic E(2) 17alpha-derivatives differ from the structure of crystallized LBD bound to E(2).

Identification of covalent attachment site of antiestrogenic estradiol 11 beta-derivatives on human estrogen receptor alpha ligand-binding domain

Affinity labeling of human estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) by high affinity and antiestrogenic estradiol (E(2)) 11 beta-derivatives, 11 beta-bromoacetamidoethoxyphenylE(2) (11BAEOPE(2)) and 11 beta-bromoacetamidopentoxyphenylE(2) (11BAPOPE(2)) was studied using glutathione-S-transferase (GST) fused to the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of human ERalpha. To identify and quantify the electrophile covalent attachment sites on LBD, [(14)C]11BAEOPE(2)- and [(14)C]11BAPOPE(2)-alkylated LBD were separated from GST, purified, and then trypsinized. HPLC of LBD tryptic fragments afforded one and two radioactive peaks (the ratio of the two latter peaks was 84/16) in the chromatograms related to LBD alkylated by 11BAEOPE(2) and 11BAPOPE(2), respectively. Mass spectrometry (MS) analyses of the fractions related to the single peak and to the major one of the two peaks showed signals which accurately matched the mass of electrophile-alkylated Cys(530)Lys(531) LBD tryptic peptide, whereas no signal compatible with an alkylated form of an LBD tryptic peptide was detected in the MS analysis of the minor peak-related fractions. MS/MS analysis of alkylated CysLys dipeptide revealed the presence of fragments that unambiguously designated the Cys S as the covalent attachment site of the electrophiles. We attempted to interpret the biochemical data by molecular modeling using various crystallographic structures of human LBD-ligand complexes. In agreement with the endocrine properties of electrophiles, labeling at Cys(530) could be accounted for by a LBD structure derived from LBD bound to 4-hydroxytamoxifen, a triphenylethylene antiestrogen. The common attachment to Cys(530) of estrogenic E(2) 17 alpha-derivatives [H. Mattras, S. Aliau, E. Demey, J. Poncet, J.L. Borgna, Mass spectrometry identification of covalent attachment sites of two related estrogenic ligands on human estrogen receptor alpha, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 98 (4-5), in press] and antiestrogenic E(2) 11 beta-derivatives suggests that the LBD portion encompassing this amino acid possesses a marked plasticity.

Estrogen receptor mutations in human disease

As early as the 1800s, the actions of estrogen have been implicated in the development and progression of breast cancer. The estrogen receptor (ER) was identified in the late 1950s and purified a few years later. However, it was not until the 1980s that the first ER was molecularly cloned, and in the mid 1990s, a second ER was cloned. These two related receptors are now called ERalpha and ERbeta, respectively. Since their discovery, much research has focused on identifying alterations within the coding sequence of these receptors in clinical samples. As a result, a large number of naturally occurring splice variants of both ERalpha and ERbeta have been identified in normal epithelium and diseased or cancerous tissues. In contrast, only a few point mutations have been identified in human patient samples from a variety of disease states, including breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and psychiatric diseases. To elucidate the mechanism of action for these variant isoforms or mutant receptors, experimental mutagenesis has been used to analyze the function of distinct amino acid residues in the ERs. This review will focus on ERalpha and ERbeta alterations in breast cancer.

S-palmitoylation modulates human estrogen receptor-α functions

17beta-Estradiol (E2)-induced rapid functions (from seconds to minutes) can be attributed to a fraction of nuclear estrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) localized at the plasma membrane. As a potential mechanism, we postulated that S-palmitoylation of the Cys447 residue may explain the ability of ERalpha to associate to plasma membrane making possible E2-dependent rapid functions [e.g., extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) activation]. Here, we report direct evidence that the mutation of the Cys447 residue to Ala impairs human ERalpha palmitoylation and E2-induced rapid ERK phosphorylation when transfected in ER-devoid HeLa cells. Moreover, the Cys447Ala mutation significantly decreases the E2-induced transactivation of an estrogen responsive element construct probe. Similar effects were obtained treating HeLa cells transfected with wild type ERalpha with the palmitoyl-acyltransferase inhibitor 2-bromo-hexadecanoic acid. Moreover, the deletion of the A-D domains (containing the DNA binding region) of ERalpha had no consequences on [(3)H]palmitate incorporation, whereas no palmitoylation occurred in the ERalpha mutant devoid of the E domain (i.e., ligand binding domain). These results point to the pivotal role of the Cys447 residue in ERalpha palmitoylation and in the modulation of E2-induced non-genomic functions.

The C(19) position of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) faces outward in the vitamin D sterol-binding pocket of vitamin D-binding protein

The radiolabeled affinity and photoaffinity analogues of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) (25-OH-D(3)) with probes at the C-19 position failed to specifically label the 25-OH-D(3)-binding pocket of vitamin D-binding protein (DBP). However, a hybrid analogue, with a bromoacetate affinity probe and a photoaffinity probe at C(3)-OH and C(19) positions, respectively, specifically labeled the ligand-binding pocket, suggesting that C(3)-OH points towards the 'inside' of the binding cavity while the C(19) position faces away from it.

Cysteine mutants as chemical sensors for ligand-receptor interactions

The incorporation of cysteine residues into membrane receptors by mutagenesis has enabled the development of engineered proteins. Chemical modification of the mutant receptor using a wide range of biochemical and biophysical probes has facilitated functional studies of ligand-receptor interactions. In particular, the substituted-cysteine accessibility method (SCAM) represents a successful example of how to probe transmembrane receptor domains after chemical modification of the mutants with sulfydryl-reacting molecules. We propose an extension of this methodology using site-specific affinity probes that react with cysteine mutants to gain reliable structural information on the binding of a ligand in its receptor site.

Why do we need a three-dimensional architecture of the ligand-binding domain of the nuclear 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) receptor?

Highly specific binding of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) (1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)) by vitamin D receptor (VDR), a nuclear transcriptional factor, activates a genomic mechanism that is manifested in the multiple biologic properties of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3). Numerous synthetic analogs of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) have been employed to study the interaction between 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) and VDR, and to identify structural markers in 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) that are important for VDR-binding. On the other hand the three-dimensional structure of VDR remained elusive till very recently. In the present study we employed affinity labeling (by 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3)-3-bromoacetate, 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3)-3-BE) of VDR to identify C(288) as the anchoring residue for the 3-hydroxyl group of 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3) inside the ligand-binding domain of VDR (VDR-LBD). In addition we carried out mutation/hormone-binding analyses to determine the importance of M(284) and W(286) toward hormone binding. We incorporated this information with the three-dimensional structure of the LBD of progesterone receptor to develop a homology-extension model of VDR-LBD. This model identified several amino acid residues as ligand-contact points inside the LBD. Mutational and hormone-binding analyses of these residues verified the structure-functional authenticity of this model, in comparison with the crystal structure of VDR, bound to 1alpha,25(OH)(2)D(3).

Molecular modeling, affinity labeling, and site-directed mutagenesis define the key points of interaction between the ligand-binding domain of the vitamin D nuclear receptor and 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3

We have combined molecular modeling and classical structure-function techniques to define the interactions between the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the vitamin D nuclear receptor (VDR) and its natural ligand, 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) [1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)]. The affinity analogue 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)-3-bromoacetate exclusively labeled Cys-288 in the VDR-LBD. Mutation of C288 to glycine abolished this affinity labeling, whereas the VDR-LBD mutants C337G and C369G (other conserved cysteines in the VDR-LBD) were labeled similarly to the wild-type protein. These results revealed that the A-ring 3-OH group docks next to C288 in the binding pocket. We further mutated M284 and W286 (separately creating M284A, M284S, W286A, and W286F) and caused severe loss of ligand binding, indicating the crucial role played by the contiguous segment between M284 and C288. Alignment of the VDR-LBD sequence with the sequences of nuclear receptor LBDs of known 3-D structure positioned M284 and W286 in the presumed beta-hairpin of the molecule, thereby identifying it as the region contacting the A-ring of 1alpha, 25-(OH)(2)D(3). From the multiple sequence alignment, we developed a homologous extension model of the VDR-LBD. The model has a canonical nuclear receptor fold with helices H1-H12 and a single beta hairpin but lacks the long insert (residues 161-221) between H2 and H3. We docked the alpha-conformation of the A-ring into the binding pocket first so as to incorporate the above-noted interacting residues. The model predicts hydrogen bonding contacts between ligand and protein at S237 and D299 as well as at the site of the natural mutation R274L. Mutation of S237 or D299 to alanine largely abolished ligand binding, whereas changing K302, a nonligand-contacting residue, to alanine left binding unaffected. In the "activation" helix 12, the model places V418 closest to the ligand, and, consistent with this prediction, the mutation V418S abolished ligand binding. The studies together have enabled us to identify 1alpha,25-(OH)(2)D(3)-binding motifs in the ligand-binding pocket of VDR.

Steroidal affinity labels of the estrogen receptor alpha. 4. Electrophilic 11beta-aryl derivatives of estradiol

Ten electrophilic estradiol 11beta-aryl derivatives were synthesized, with three different types of 11beta-substituent: (i) pOO(CH(2))(2)X (compounds: 6, X = OSO(2)CH(3); 7, X = I; 13, X = NHCOCH(2)Cl; 15, X = N(CH(3))COCH(2)Br; and 16, X = N(CH(3))COCH(2)Cl); (ii) pOO(CH(2))(5)X (compounds: 17, X = I; 20, X = NHCOCH(2)Br; and 22, X = N(CH(3))COCH(2)Br); and (iii) pOC(triple bond)CCH(2)X (compounds: 27, X = NHCOCH(2)Cl; and 29, X = N(CH(3))COCH(2)Cl). The range of their apparent affinity constants for binding the lamb uterine estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) was 3-40% that of estradiol. Six electrophiles, chloroacetamides 13, 16, 27, and 29, iodide 17, and bromoacetamide 20 (whose arm linking the electrophilic carbon to the 11beta-phenyl group includes at least six bonds), were able to irreversibly inhibit the binding of [(3)H]estradiol to ER (25-60% decrease in binding sites), with the following compound effectiveness order: 17 < 13 < 16 approximately 20 approximately 27 approximately 29. Mesylate 6, iodide 7 (whose linking arm includes only three bonds), and bromoacetamides 15 and 22 (which differ from 16 by the Cl to Br change and from 20 by the NH to NCH(3) change, respectively) were much less effective (<10% decrease in binding sites, if any). The fact that the inactivation of estradiol-binding sites by the six electrophiles was totally prevented by estradiol indicated that they were ER affinity labeling agents. When ER was modified by methyl methanethiosulfonate, an SH-specific reagent, the different compounds led to very contrasting results in ER affinity labeling. With modified ER, iodide 17 and chloroacetamides 27 and 29 were practically inactive, chloroacetamides 13 and 16 and bromoacetamide 20 were still active but less effective than on the native ER, whereas tertiary bromoacetamides 15 and 22, found to be practically inactive on native ER, became the most effective electrophiles ( approximately 45% and approximately 65% binding sites inactivated, respectively). The results indicate that in the steroid-filled hormone-binding pocket: (i) nucleophilic residues are localized on the beta-side but relatively remote from the steroid nucleus (distance from C-11 > "seven bonds"); (ii) relatively discrete changes in the electrophilic functionality, such as Cl to Br or NH to NCH(3) of haloacetamido compounds, can markedly modify the positioning of the electrophilic center which could no longer react with the nucleophilic residues; and (iii) cysteine residues (probably homologues of human ERalpha cysteine 381 and/or cysteine 530) are, at least partly, the covalent attachment sites of the electrophiles. Moreover, modification of cysteine residues by methyl methanethiosulfonate changes the structure of the hormone-binding pocket, whose labeling by the various electrophiles is profoundly altered.

Probing the vitamin D sterol-binding pocket of human vitamin D-binding protein with bromoacetate affinity labeling reagents containing the affinity probe at C-3, C-6, C-11, and C-19 positions of parent vitamin D sterols

The multiple physiological properties of vitamin D-binding protein (DBP) include organ-specific transportation of vitamin D(3) and its metabolites, manifested by its ability to bind vitamin D sterols with high affinity. In the present investigation we probed the vitamin D sterol-binding pocket of human DBP with affinity labeling analogs of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) ¿25-OH-D(3) and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) ¿1,25(OH)(2)D(3) containing bromoacetate alkylating probe at C-3 (A-ring), C-6 (triene), C-11 (C-ring), and C-19 (exocyclic methylene) of the parent sterol. Competitive binding assays with DBP showed approximately 22-, 68-, and 2000-fold decrease in the binding of 1,25(OH)(2)-D(3)-11-BE, 25-OH-D(3)-3-BE, and 25-OH-D(3)-6-BE, respectively, compared to that seen with 25-OH-D(3), while there was no significant difference in the DBP-binding affinity of 25-OH-D(3)-19-BE and 25-OH-D(3). Surprisingly, ¿(14)C25-OH-D(3)-11-BE and ¿(14)C1, 25(OH)(2)-D(3)-19-BE failed to label DBP despite high-affinity DBP-binding, indicating the absence of any nucleophilic amino acid in the vicinity of their bromoacetate moiety to form a covalent bond, while these analogs are inside the binding pocket. In contrast, ¿(14)C25-OH-D(3)-6-BE and ¿(14)C25-OH-D(3)-3-BE specifically labeled DBP. BNPS-skatole digestion of DBP labeled with ¿(14)C25-OH-D(3)-3-BE or ¿(14)C25-OH-D(3)-6-BE produced two peptides (M(r) 17,400 and 33,840), with radioactivity associated with the N- and C-terminal peptides, respectively, raising the possibility that either different areas of the same vitamin D sterol-binding pocket, or different domains of DBP might be labeled by these analogs. Successful affinity labeling of recombinant domain I (1-203) of DBP with both reagents indicated that different areas of the same vitamin D-binding pocket (domain I) were labeled. These affinity analogs are potentially useful for "mapping" the vitamin D sterol-binding pocket and developing a functional model.

Homology model for the ligand-binding domain of the human estrogen receptor

We have modeled the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of the human estrogen receptor protein (hER) by homology to the known crystal structure of the LBD of the alpha isoform of human retinoate-X receptor (hRX). Alignment of hER with members of the nuclear receptor superfamily defined probable secondary structures which we used to constrain backbone torsion angles and hydrogen bonds. From published studies we identified key interactions between hER and estradiol to use to dock the hormone in its ligand-binding pocket. Since the hRX crystal structure corresponds to the unliganded form of the LBD, we adopted the "mousetrap" mechanism proposed by Renaud et al to predict the structure of the E2-bound hER. Refinement by molecular dynamics and energy minimization gave a model which matches well the known facts about the estradiol phamacophore. It also provides a possible explanation for how hER discriminates between estradiol and testosterone.