Chalcogen−Chalcogen Bonds in Edge-Sharing Square-Planar d8 Complexes. Are They Possible?

Delocalized Bonding in Li2X2 Rings: Probing the Limits of the Covalent and Ionic Bonding Models

In spite of the highly ionic character of most lithium-element bonds, the bonding within Li₂X₂ rings presents similarities with that found in analogous transition metal systems. They obey simple framework electron counting rules that allow us to predict whether they will form a regular ring or a squeezed one with short Li-Li or X-X distances. A combined computational and structural database analysis discloses the orbital conditions that determine the framework electron counting rules. These systems probe the borderline between the covalent and ionic bonding models since, paradoxically, a non-negligible covalent contribution of the two Li atoms (formally Li⁺ ions in the ionic model) to the Li-X framework bonding favors them approaching each other within bonding distance.

Conformational Effects of [Ni2 (μ-ArS)2 ] Cores on Their Electrocatalytic Activity

Two nickel complexes supported by tridentate NS₂ ligands, [Ni₂ (κ-N,S,S,S'-N^Ph {CH₂ (MeC₆ H₂ R')S}₂ )₂ ] (1; R'=3,5-(CF₃ )₂ C₆ H₃ ) and [Ni₂ (κ-N,S,S,S'-N^iBu {CH₂ C₆ H₄ S}₂ )₂ ] (2), were prepared as bioinspired models of the active site of [NiFe] hydrogenases. The solid-state structure of 1 reveals that the [Ni₂ (μ-ArS)₂ ] core is bent, with the planes of the nickel centers at a hinge angle of 81.3(5)°, whereas 2 shows a coplanar arrangement between both nickel(II) ions in the dimeric structure. Complex 1 electrocatalyzes proton reduction from CF₃ COOH at -1.93 (overpotential of 1.04 V, with i_cat /i_p ≈21.8) and -1.47 V (overpotential of 580 mV, with i_cat /i_p ≈5.9) versus the ferrocene/ferrocenium redox couple. The electrochemical behavior of 1 relative to that of 2 may be related to the bent [Ni₂ (μ-ArS)₂ ] core, which allows proximity of the two Ni⋅⋅⋅Ni centers at 2.730(8) Å; thus possibly favoring H⁺ reduction. In contrast, the planar [Ni₂ (μ-ArS)₂ ] core of 2 results in a Ni⋅⋅⋅Ni distance of 3.364(4) Å and is unstable in the presence of acid.

[Al2O4](-), a Benchmark Gas-Phase Class II Mixed-Valence Radical Anion for the Evaluation of Quantum-Chemical Methods

The radical anion [Al2O4](-) has been identified as a rare example of a small gas-phase mixed-valence system with partially localized, weakly coupled class II character in the Robin/Day classification. It exhibits a low-lying C2v minimum with one terminal oxyl radical ligand and a high-lying D2h minimum at about 70 kJ/mol relative energy with predominantly bridge-localized-hole character. Two identical C2v minima and the D2h minimum are connected by two C2v-symmetrical transition states, which are only ca. 6-10 kJ/mol above the D2h local minimum. The small size of the system and the absence of environmental effects has for the first time enabled the computation of accurate ab initio benchmark energies, at the CCSDT(Q)/CBS level using W3-F12 theory, for a class-II mixed-valence system. These energies have been used to evaluate wave function-based methods [CCSD(T), CCSD, SCS-MP2, MP2, UHF] and density functionals ranging from semilocal (e.g., BLYP, PBE, M06L, M11L, N12) via global hybrids (B3LYP, PBE0, BLYP35, BMK, M06, M062X, M06HF, PW6B95) and range-separated hybrids (CAM-B3LYP, ωB97, ωB97X-D, LC-BLYP, LC-ωPBE, M11, N12SX), the B2PLYP double hybrid, and some local hybrid functionals. Global hybrids with about 35-43% exact-exchange (EXX) admixture (e.g., BLYP35, BMK), several range hybrids (CAM-B3LYP, ωB97X-D, ω-B97), and a local hybrid provide good to excellent agreement with benchmark energetics. In contrast, too low EXX admixture leads to an incorrect delocalized class III picture, while too large EXX overlocalizes and gives too large energy differences. These results provide support for previous method choices for mixed-valence systems in solution and for the treatment of oxyl defect sites in alumosilicates and SiO2. Vibrational gas-phase spectra at various computational levels have been compared directly to experiment and to CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pV(T+d)Z data.

Polydentate chalcogen reagents for the facile preparation of Pd2 and Pd4 complexes

The silylated organochalcogen reagents 1,2-(Me3SiSCH2)2C6H4, and 1,2-(Me3SiSeCH2)2C6H4, were prepared from the corresponding organobromides and lithium trimethylsilanechalcogenolate Li[ESiMe3] (E = S, Se). They have been characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy ((1)H, (13)C, (77)Se) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. and react under mild conditions with (1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane)palladium(ii) chloride, [PdCl2(dppp)], to provide the dinuclear organochalcogenolate-bridged complexes [(dppp)2Pd2-μ-κ(2)S-{1,2-(SCH2)2C6H4}]X2, []X2 and [(dppp)2Pd2-μ-κ(2)Se-{1,2-(SeCH2)2C6H4}]X2, []X2 (X = Cl, Br) in good yield, respectively. Furthermore, the tetranuclear palladium complex [(dppp)4Pd4-μ-κ(4)S-{1,2,4,5-(SCH2)4C6H2}]X4, []X4 (X = Cl, Br) can be synthesized from the reaction of the tetrathiotetrasilane 1,2,4,5-(Me3SiSCH2)4C6H2, and [PdCl2(dppp)]. The structures of []X2, []X2 and []X4 were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction methods. A variety of NMR experiments including two-dimensional homonuclear and heteronuclear correlated spectra were used to probe the solution behaviour of the dinuclear complexes in more detail. These complexes were further characterized by electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry, and for []X2 and []X2, UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy.

A bonding quandary--or--a demonstration of the fact that scientists are not born with logic

We document here a spirited debate among three colleagues and friends who have strong opinions on a specific bonding problem, the presence or absence of a cross-ring sulfur-sulfur bond in a trinuclear Cu(3)S(2) cluster. The example may seem esoteric, but through their struggles with this specific bond (and with each other) the authors approach the more general problematic of chemistry, the chemical bond. The discussion focuses on bond lengths and the population of bonding and antibonding orbitals, and on oxidation states, electron counting, and associated geometries. It expands to encompass other bonding criteria, and introduces examples ranging far across organic and inorganic chemistry. The authors suggest molecules that might test their ideas. An Appendix to the paper discusses a matter rarely broached in the chemical literature--should one review for publication a paper which criticizes one of your own contributions.

Is 2.07 A a record for the shortest Pt-S distance? Revision of two reported X-ray structures

The comparison of the very similar compounds (Ph(3)P)(2)Pt(mu-S)(2)Pt(PPh(3))(2) (1) and (Ph(2)PyP)(2)Pt(mu-S)(2)Pt(PPh(2)Py)(2) (2) raises intriguing questions about the reliability of the reported Pt(2)S(2) core in 1, where the Pt-S bonds are the shortest ever reported. Also, the trans-annular S...S separation of 2.69 A is surprisingly shorter in 1 than in 2 (3.01 A), but no incipient coupling between two S(2-) bridges seems reasonable in this case. Various considerations lead to reformulate 1 as [(Ph(3)P)(2)Pt(mu-OH)(2)Pt(PPh(3))(2)](BF(4))(2), 3. The sets of cell parameters for 1 and 3 are not equal but two axes match, and the volume of 1 is exactly double. Simple matrices may be constructed to interconvert the direct and reciprocal crystalline cells, thus corroborating their identity of the compounds. It is concluded that, in the structure solution of 1, some atoms were either neglected (BF(4)(-) counterions) or ill identified (sulfido in place of hydroxo bridges), while the structure of 3 was solved by collecting only one-half of the possible reflections (hence, also the different space groups). A new preparation, crystallization and X-ray structure of 3 confirms the above points and dismisses any other theoretical conjecture about two electronically different Pt(2)S(2) cores in 1 and 2.

Influence of the terminal ligands on the redox properties of the {Pt2(µ-S)2} core in [Pt2(Ph2X(CH2)2XPh2)2(µ-S)2](X = P or As) complexes and on their reactivity towards metal centres, protic acids and organic electrophiles

In order to explore possible ways for modulating the unusually rich chemistry shown by complexes of formula [L2Pt(mu-S)2PtL2] we have studied the influence of the nature of the terminal ligand L on the chemical properties of the {Pt2(mu-S)2} core. The systematic study we now report allows comparison of the behaviour of [Pt2(dpae)2(mu-S)2](dpae = Ph2As(CH2)2AsPh2) (1) with the already reported analogue [Pt2(dppe)2(mu-S)2](dppe = Ph2P(CH2)2PPh2). Complex 1 as well as the corresponding multimetallic derivatives [Pt(dpae){Pt2(dpae)2(mu-S)2}](BPh4)2 2, [M{Pt2(dpae)2(mu-S)2}2]X2 (M = Cu(II), X = BF4 3; M = Zn(II), X = BPh4 4; M = Cd(II), X = ClO4 5; M = Hg(II), X = Cl 6 or X2 = Cl(1.5)[HCl2](0.5) 6') have been characterized in the solid phase and in solution. Comparison of structural parameters of 1 and 3-6' with those of the corresponding phosphine analogues, together with the results of the electrochemical study for 1, allow us to conclude that replacement of dppe by dpae causes a decrease in basicity of the {Pt2(mu-S)2} core. The study of the reactivity of 1 towards CH2Cl2 and protic acids has led to the structural characterization of [Pt(dpae)(S2CH2)] 9 and [PtCl2(dpae)] 10. Moreover, comparison with the reactivity of [Pt2(dppe)2(mu-S)2] indicates that the stability of the intermediate species as well as the nature of the final products in both multistep reactions are sensitive to the nature of the terminal ligand.