Transition-metal complexes with sulfur atoms as ligands. 5. Synthesis and structural characterization of doubly sulfur-bridged binuclear complexes of cobalt with the tris(tertiary phosphine) 1,1,1-tris((diphenylphosphino)methyl)ethane

Nonheme binuclear transition metal complexes with hydrosulfide and polychalcogenides

The intriguing chemistry of chalcogen (S, Se)-containing ligands and their capability to bridge multiple metal centres have resulted in a plethora of reports on transition metal complexes featuring hydrosulfide (HS-) and polychalcogenides (En2-, E = S, Se). While a large number of such molecules are strictly organometallic complexes, examples of non-organometallic complexes featuring HS- and En2- with N-/O-donor ligands are relatively rare. The general synthetic procedure for the transition metal-hydrosulfido complexes involves the reaction of the corresponding metal salts with HS-/H2S and this is prone to generate sulfido bridged oligomers in the absence of sterically demanding ligands. On the other hand, the synthetic methods for the preparation of transition metal-polychalcogenido complexes include the reaction of the corresponding metal salts with En2- or the two electron oxidation of low-valent metals with elemental chalcogen, often at an elevated temperature and/or for a long time. Recently, we have developed new synthetic methods for the preparation of two new classes of binuclear transition metal complexes featuring either HS-, or Sn2- and Sen2- ligands. The new method for the synthesis of transition metal-hydrosulfido complexes involved transition metal-mediated hydrolysis of thiolates at room temperature (RT), while the method for the synthesis of transition metal-polychalcogenido complexes involved redox reaction of coordinated thiolates and exogenous elemental chalcogens at RT. An overview of the synthetic aspects, structural properties and intriguing reactivity of these two new classes of transition metal complexes is presented.

Generation and Reactivity of Polychalcogenide Chains in Binuclear Cobalt(II) Complexes

A series of six binuclear Co(II)-thiolate complexes, [Co2(BPMP)(S-C6H4-o-X)2]1+ (X = OMe, 2; NH2, 3), [Co2(BPMP)(μ-S-C6H4-o-O)]1+ (4), and [Co2(BPMP)(μ-Y)]1+ (Y = bdt, 5; tdt, 6; mnt, 7), has been synthesized from [Co2(BPMP)(MeOH)2(Cl)2]1+ (1a) and [Co2(BPMP)(Cl)2]1+ (1b), where BPMP1- is the anion of 2,6-bis[[bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amino]methyl]-4-methylphenol. While 2 and 3 could allow the two-electron redox reaction of the two coordinated thiolates with elemental sulfur (S8) to generate [Co2(BPMP)(μ-S5)]1+ (8), the complexes, 4-7, could not undergo a similar reaction. An analogous redox reaction of 2 with elemental selenium ([Se]) produced [{Co2(BPMP)(μ-Se4)}{Co2(BPMP)(μ-Se3)}]2+ (9a) and [Co2(BPMP)(μ-Se4)]1+ (9b). Further reaction of these polychalcogenido complexes, 8 and 9a/9b, with PPh3 allowed the isolation of [Co2(BPMP)(μ-S)]1+ (10) and [Co2(BPMP)(μ-Se2)]1+ (11), which, in turn, could be converted back to 8 and 9a upon treatment with S8 and [Se], respectively. Interestingly, while the redox reaction of the polyselenide chains in 9a and 11 with S8 produced 8 and [Se], the treatment of 8 with [Se] gave back only the starting material (8), thus demonstrating the different redox behavior of sulfur and selenium. Furthermore, the reaction of 8 and 9a/9b with activated alkynes and cyanide (CN-) allowed the isolation of the complexes, [Co2(BPMP)(μ-E2C2(CO2R)2)]1+ (E = S: 12a, R = Me; 12b, R = Et; E = Se: 13a, R = Me; 13b, R = Et) and [Co2(BPMP)(μ-SH)(NCS)2] (14), respectively. The present work, thus, provides an interesting synthetic strategy, interconversions, and detailed comparative reactivity of binuclear Co(II)-polychalcogenido complexes.

Activation of Molecular Hydrogen over a Binuclear Complex with Rh2S2 Core: DFT Calculations and NMR Mechanistic Studies

The dicationic complex [(triphos)Rh(mu-S)(2)Rh(triphos)](2+), 1 (modeled as 1c) [triphos = CH(3)C(CH(2)PPh(2))(3)], is known to activate two dihydrogen molecules and produce the bis(mu-hydrosulfido) product [(triphos)(H)Rh(mu-SH)(2)Rh(H)(triphos)](2+), 2 (modeled as 2b), from which 1 is reversibly obtained. The possible steps of the process have been investigated with DFT calculations. It has been found that each d(6) metal ion in 1c, with local square pyramidal geometry, is able to anchor one H(2) molecule in the side-on coordination. The step is followed by heterolytic splitting of the H-H bond over one adjacent and polarized Rh-S linkage. The process may be completed before the second H(2) molecule is added. Alternatively, both H(2) molecules are trapped by the Rh(2)S(2) core before being split in two distinct steps. Since the ambiguity could not be solved by calculations, (31)P and (1)H NMR experiments, including para-hydrogen techniques, have been performed to identify the actual pathway. In no case is there experimental evidence for any Rh-(eta(2)-H(2)) adduct, probably due to its very short lifetime. Conversely, (1)H NMR analysis of the hydride region indicates only one reaction intermediate which corresponds to the monohydride-mu-hydrosulfide complex [(triphos)Rh(H)(mu-SH)(mu-S)Rh(triphos)](2+) (3) (model 5a). This excludes the second hypothesized pathway. From an energetic viewpoint the computational results support the feasibility of the whole process. In fact, the highest energy for H(2) activation is 8.6 kcal mol(-1), while a larger but still surmountable barrier of 34.6 kcal mol(-1) is in line with the reversibility of the process.