Facile concerted proton-electron transfers in a ruthenium terpyridine-4'-carboxylate complex with a long distance between the redox and basic sites

Revisiting the Electrochemistry of TEMPOH Analogues in Acetonitrile

Hydroxylamines, represented by 1-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine (TEMPOH), are widely involved as active species in various chemical and electrochemical oxidations. The electrochemical behavior of TEMPOH is crucial to understanding the mechanisms of TEMPO-mediated redox sequences. However, compared to abundant studies on TEMPOH electrochemistry in aqueous solutions, the sole value of its oxidation potential E_ox(TEMPOH) in organic solutions was reported to be 0.7 V (vs Fc in acetonitrile), seemingly conflicting with experimentally observed facile oxidation of TEMPOH. Herein, the electrochemistry of TEMPOH derivatives in acetonitrile was revisited, featuring much smaller oxidation potentials (about 0 V) than literature ones. Acid/base effects and kinetic studies lent credibility to these new values. Such a 0.7 V energy discrepancy impelled us to review the thermodynamic properties and oxidation mechanisms of TEMPOH deduced from the old value.

Free Energies of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reagents and Their Applications

We present an update and revision to our 2010 review on the topic of proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reagent thermochemistry. Over the past decade, the data and thermochemical formalisms presented in that review have been of value to multiple fields. Concurrently, there have been advances in the thermochemical cycles and experimental methods used to measure these values. This Review (i) summarizes those advancements, (ii) corrects systematic errors in our prior review that shifted many of the absolute values in the tabulated data, (iii) provides updated tables of thermochemical values, and (iv) discusses new conclusions and opportunities from the assembled data and associated techniques. We advocate for updated thermochemical cycles that provide greater clarity and reduce experimental barriers to the calculation and measurement of Gibbs free energies for the conversion of X to XH_n in PCET reactions. In particular, we demonstrate the utility and generality of reporting potentials of hydrogenation, E°(V vs H₂), in almost any solvent and how these values are connected to more widely reported bond dissociation free energies (BDFEs). The tabulated data demonstrate that E°(V vs H₂) and BDFEs are generally insensitive to the nature of the solvent and, in some cases, even to the phase (gas versus solution). This Review also presents introductions to several emerging fields in PCET thermochemistry to give readers windows into the diversity of research being performed. Some of the next frontiers in this rapidly growing field are coordination-induced bond weakening, PCET in novel solvent environments, and reactions at material interfaces.

Reactivity Properties of Mixed- and High-Valent Bis(μ-Hydroxide)-Dinickel Complexes

Despite their potential role in enzymatic systems, there is a dearth of hydroxide-bridged high-valent oxidants. We recently reported the synthesis and characterization of Ni^IINi^III(μ-OH)₂ (2) and Ni₂ ^III(μ-OH)₂ (3) species supported by a dicarboxamidate ligand (N,N'-bis(2,6-dimethyl-phenyl)-2,2-dimethylmalonamide). Herein, we explore the oxidative reactivity of these species using a series of para-substituted 2,6-di-tert-butyl-phenols (4-X-2,6-DTBP, X = -OCH₃, -CH₂CH₃, -CH₃, -C(CH₃)₃, -H, -Br, -CN, and -NO₂) as a mechanistic probe. Interestingly, upon reaction of 3 with the substrates, the formation of a new transient species, 2', was observed. 2' is postulated to be a protic congener of 2. All three species were demonstrated to react with the substituted phenols through a hydrogen atom transfer reaction mechanism, which was elucidated further by analysis of the postreaction mixtures. Critically, 3 was demonstrated to react at far superior rates to 2 and 2', and oxidized substrates more efficiently than any bis-μ-oxo-Ni₂ ^III reported to date. The kinetic superiority of 3 with respect to 2 and 2' was attributed to a stronger bond in the product of oxidation by 3 when compared to those calculated for 2 and 2'.

Uranyl ion complexes with 2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine-4′-carboxylate. Interpenetration of networks involving “expanded ligands”

2,2′:6′,2′′-Terpyridine-4′-carboxylate (tpyc−) forms both homo- and heterometallic uranyl ion complexes including a chiral, twofold interpenetrated polymer involving the “expanded ligand” Ni(tpyc)2.

Excited-state proton-coupled electron transfer within ion pairs

The use of light to drive proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions has received growing interest, with recent focus on the direct use of excited states in PCET reactions (ES-PCET). Electrostatic ion pairs provide a scaffold to reduce reaction orders and have facilitated many discoveries in electron-transfer chemistry. Their use, however, has not translated to PCET. Herein, we show that ion pairs, formed solely through electrostatic interactions, provide a general, facile means to study an ES-PCET mechanism. These ion pairs formed readily between salicylate anions and tetracationic ruthenium complexes in acetonitrile solution. Upon light excitation, quenching of the ruthenium excited state occurred through ES-PCET oxidation of salicylate within the ion pair. Transient absorption spectroscopy identified the reduced ruthenium complex and oxidized salicylate radical as the primary photoproducts of this reaction. The reduced reaction order due to ion pairing allowed the first-order PCET rate constants to be directly measured through nanosecond photoluminescence spectroscopy. These PCET rate constants saturated at larger driving forces consistent with approaching the Marcus barrierless region. Surprisingly, a proton-transfer tautomer of salicylate, with the proton localized on the carboxylate functional group, was present in acetonitrile. A pre-equilibrium model based on this tautomerization provided non-adiabatic electron-transfer rate constants that were well described by Marcus theory. Electrostatic ion pairs were critical to our ability to investigate this PCET mechanism without the need to covalently link the donor and acceptor or introduce specific hydrogen bonding sites that could compete in alternate PCET pathways.

Probing Hydrogen Atom Transfer at a Phosphorus(V) Oxide Bond Using a "Bulky Hydrogen Atom" Surrogate: Analogies to PCET

Recent computational studies suggest that the phosphate support in the commercial vanadium phosphate oxide (VPO) catalyst may play a critical role in initiating butane C-H bond activation through a mechanism termed reduction-coupled oxo activation (ROA) similar to proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET); however, no experimental evidence exists to support this mechanism. Herein, we present molecular model compounds, (Ph₂N)₃V═N-P(O)Ar₂ (Ar = C₆F₅ (2a), Ph (2b)), which are reactive to both weak H atom donors and a Me₃Si^• (a "bulky hydrogen atom" surrogate) donor, 1,4-bis(trimethylsilyl)pyrazine. While the former reaction led to product decomposition, the latter resulted in the isolation of the reduced, silylated complexes (Ph₂N)₃V-N═P(OSiMe₃)Ar₂ (3a/b). Detailed analyses of possible reaction pathways, involving the isolation and full characterization of potential stepwise square-scheme intermediates, as well as the determination of minimum experimentally and computationally derived thermochemical values, are described. We find that stepwise electron transfer (ET) + silylium transfer (ST) or concerted EST mechanisms are most likely. This study provides the first experimental evidence supporting a ROA mechanism and may inform future studies in homogeneous or heterogeneous C-H activation chemistry, as well as open up a possible new avenue for main group/transition metal cooperative redox reactivity.

A Continuum of Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactivity

Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) covers a wide range of reactions involving the transfer(s) of electrons and protons. The best-known PCET reaction, hydrogen atom transfer (HAT), has been studied in detail for more than a century. HAT is generally described as the concerted transfer of a hydrogen atom (H^• ≡ H⁺ + e^-) from one group to another, Y + H-X → Y-H + X, but a strict definition of HAT has been difficult to establish. Distinctions are more challenging when the transfer of "H^•" involves e^- and H⁺ that transfer to/from spatially distinct sites or even completely separate reagents (multiple-site concerted proton-electron transfer, MS-CPET). MS-CPET reactivity is increasingly proposed in biological and synthetic contexts, and some reactions typically described as HAT more resemble MS-CPET. Despite that HAT and MS-CPET reactions "look different," we argue here that these reactions lie on a reactivity continuum, and that they are governed by many of the same key parameters. This Account walks the reader across this PCET reactivity continuum, using a series of studies to show the strong similarities of reactions that move protons and electrons in seemingly different ways. To prepare for our stroll, we describe the thermochemical and kinetic frameworks for HAT and MS-CPET. The driving force for a solution HAT reaction is most easily discussed as the difference in the bond dissociation free energies (BDFEs) of the reactants and products. BDFEs can be analyzed as sums of electron and proton transfer steps and can therefore be obtained from p K_a and E° values. Even though MS-CPET reactions do not make and break H-X bonds in the same way as HAT, the same thermochemical description can be used with the introduction of an effective BDFE (BDFE_eff). The BDFE_eff of a reductant/acid pair is the free energy of that pair to form H^•, which can be obtained from p K_a and E° values in an analogous fashion to a standard BDFE. When the PCET thermochemistry is known, HAT and PCET rate constants can be understood and often predicted using linear free energy relationships (the Brønsted catalysis law) and Marcus theory type approaches. After this background, we walk the reader through a continuum of PCET reactivity. Our journey begins with a study of metal-mediated HAT from hydrocarbon substrates to a metal-oxo complex and travels to the MS-CPET end of the reactivity spectrum, involving the transfer of H⁺ and e^- from the hydroxylamine TEMPOH to two completely separate molecules. These examples, and those in between, are all analyzed within the same thermodynamic and kinetic framework. A description of the first examples of MS-CPET with C-H bonds uses the same framework and highlights the importance of hydrogen bonding and preorganization. The examples and analyses show that the reactions along the PCET continuum are more similar than they are different, and that attempts to divide these reactions into subcategories can obscure much of the essential chemistry. We hope that developing the many common features of these reactions will help experts and newcomers alike to explore exciting new territories in PCET reactivity.

Tuning the Reactivity of Terminal Nickel(III)-Oxygen Adducts for C-H Bond Activation

Two metastable Ni^III complexes, [Ni^III(OAc)(L)] and [Ni^III(ONO₂)(L)] (L = N,N'-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-2,6-pyridinedicarboxamidate, OAc = acetate), were prepared, adding to the previously prepared [Ni^III(OCO₂H)(L)], with the purpose of probing the properties of terminal late-transition metal oxidants. These high-valent oxidants were prepared by the one-electron oxidation of their Ni^II precursors ([Ni^II(OAc)(L)]^- and [Ni^II(ONO₂)(L)]^-) with tris(4-bromophenyl)ammoniumyl hexachloroantimonate. Fascinatingly, the reaction between any [Ni^II(X)(L)]^- and NaOCl/acetic acid (AcOH) or cerium ammonium nitrate ((NH₄)₂[Ce^IV(NO₃)₆], CAN), yielded [Ni^III(OAc)(L)] and [Ni^III(ONO₂)(L)], respectively. An array of spectroscopic characterizations (electronic absorption, electron paramagnetic resonance, X-ray absorption spectroscopies), electrochemical methods, and computational predictions (density functional theory) have been used to determine the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of these highly reactive metastable oxidants. The Ni^III-oxidants proved competent in the oxidation of phenols (weak O-H bonds) and a series of hydrocarbon substrates (some with strong C-H bonds). Kinetic investigation of the reactions with di-tert-butylphenols showed a 15-fold enhanced reaction rate for [Ni^III(ONO₂)(L)] compared to [Ni^III(OCO₂H)(L)] and [Ni^III(OAc)(L)], demonstrating the effect of electron-deficiency of the O-ligand on oxidizing power. The oxidation of a series of hydrocarbons by [Ni^III(OAc)(L)] was further examined. A linear correlation between the rate constant and the bond dissociation energy of the C-H bonds in the substrates was indicative of a hydrogen atom transfer mechanism. The reaction rate with dihydroanthracene (k₂ = 8.1 M^-1 s^-1) compared favorably with the most reactive high-valent metal-oxidants, and showcases the exceptional reactivity of late transition metal-oxygen adducts.

A tetranuclear ruthenium complex with bridging pyridine-2,4-dicarboxylato ligands forming a square metallamacrocycle

Treatment of [RuCl2(PPh3)3] with equimolar amounts of 2,4-pyridinedicarboxylic acid (2,4-dipicH2) in the presence of Et3N afforded a tetranuclear complex [Ru(μ-2,4-dipic)(PPh3)2]4 (1) as red crystals. The crystal and molecular structure of [Ru(μ-2,4-dipic)(PPh3)2]4·CHCl3·8H2O (1·CHCl3·8H2O) was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Each ruthenium center in 1 is six-coordinated with two phosphorus atoms from triphenylphosphine ligands, one nitrogen atom from a pyridyl moiety and three oxygen atoms from two 2,4-dipic2– ligands. 2,4-Pyridinedicarboxylate dianions (2,4-dipic2–) act as bridging ligands to form the stable tetranuclear metallamacrocyclic compound. The electrochemical properties of 1 were also investigated.

Bond-weakening catalysis: conjugate aminations enabled by the soft homolysis of strong N-H bonds

The ability of redox-active metal centers to weaken the bonds in associated ligands is well precedented, but has rarely been utilized as a mechanism of substrate activation in catalysis. Here we describe a catalytic bond-weakening protocol for conjugate amination wherein the strong N-H bonds in N-aryl amides (N-H bond dissociation free energies ∼100 kcal/mol) are destabilized by ∼33 kcal/mol upon by coordination to a reducing titanocene complex, enabling their abstraction by the weak H-atom acceptor TEMPO through a proton-coupled electron transfer process. Significantly, this soft homolysis mechanism provides a method to generate closed-shell, metalated nucleophiles under neutral conditions in the absence of a Brønsted base.

Moving protons and electrons in biomimetic systems

An enormous variety of biological redox reactions are accompanied by changes in proton content at enzyme active sites, in their associated cofactors, in substrates and/or products, and between protein interfaces. Understanding this breadth of reactivity is an ongoing chemical challenge. A great many workers have developed and investigated biomimetic model complexes to build new ways of thinking about the mechanistic underpinnings of such complex biological proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions. Of particular importance are those model reactions that involve transfer of one proton (H(+)) and one electron (e(-)), which is equivalent to transfer of a hydrogen atom (H(•)). In this Current Topic, we review key concepts in PCET reactivity and describe important advances in biomimetic PCET chemistry, with a special emphasis on research that has enhanced efforts to understand biological PCET reactions.

Proton-coupled electron transfer with photoexcited metal complexes

Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) plays a crucial role in many enzymatic reactions and is relevant for a variety of processes including water oxidation, nitrogen fixation, and carbon dioxide reduction. Much of the research on PCET has focused on transfers between molecules in their electronic ground states, but increasingly researchers are investigating PCET between photoexcited reactants. This Account describes recent studies of excited-state PCET with d(6) metal complexes emphasizing work performed in my laboratory. Upon photoexcitation, some complexes release an electron and a proton to benzoquinone reaction partners. Others act as combined electron-proton acceptors in the presence of phenols. As a result, we can investigate photoinduced PCET involving electron and proton transfer in a given direction, a process that resembles hydrogen-atom transfer (HAT). In other studies, the photoexcited metal complexes merely serve as electron donors or electron acceptors because the proton donating and accepting sites are located on other parts of the molecular PCET ensemble. We and others have used this multisite design to explore so-called bidirectional PCET which occurs in many enzymes. A central question in all of these studies is whether concerted proton-electron transfer (CPET) can compete kinetically with sequential electron and proton transfer steps. Short laser pulses can trigger excited-state PCET, making it possible to investigate rapid reactions. Luminescence spectroscopy is a convenient tool for monitoring PCET, but unambiguous identification of reaction products can require a combination of luminescence spectroscopy and transient absorption spectroscopy. Nevertheless, in some cases, distinguishing between PCET photoproducts and reaction products formed by simple photoinduced electron transfer (ET) (reactions that don't include proton transfer) is tricky. Some of the studies presented here deal directly with this important problem. In one case study we employed a cyclometalated iridium(III) complex. Our other studies with ruthenium(II) complexes and phenols focused on systematic variations of the reaction free energies for the CPET, ET, and proton transfer (PT) steps to explore their influence on the overall PCET reaction. Still other work with rhenium(I) complexes concentrated on the question of how the electronic structure of the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited states affects PCET. We used covalent rhenium(I)-phenol dyads to explore the influence of the electron donor-electron acceptor distance on bidirectional PCET. In covalent triarylamine-Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/Os(bpy)₃²⁺-anthraquinone triads (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine), hydrogen-bond donating solvents significantly lengthened the lifetimes of photogenerated electron/hole pairs because of hydrogen-bonding to the quinone radical anion. Until now, comparatively few researchers have investigated this variation of PCET: the strengthening of H-bonds upon photoreduction.

Long Range Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer Reactions of Bis(imidazole) Iron Tetraphenylporphyrins Linked to Benzoates

Concerted proton-electron transfer (CPET) reactions in iron carboxy-tetraphenylporphyrin complexes have been investigated using both experimental and theoretical methods. Synthetic heme models abstract H⁺ and e^- from the hydroxylamine TEMPOH or an ascorbate derivative, and the kinetics of the TEMPOH reaction indicate concerted transfer of H⁺ and e^-. Phenylene linker domains vary the electron donor/acceptor separation by approximately 4 Å. The rate data and extensive molecular simulations show that the electronic coupling decay constant (β) depends on conformational flexibility and solvation associated with the linker domain. Our best estimate of β is 0.23 ± 0.07 Å^-1, a value that is near the low end of the range (0.2-0.5 Å^-1) established for electron transfer reactions involving related linkers. This is the first analysis of β for a CPET reaction.

Proton-coupled electron transfer reactions at a heme-propionate in an iron-protoporphyrin-IX model compound

A heme model system has been developed in which the heme-propionate is the only proton donating/accepting site, using protoporphyrin IX-monomethyl esters (PPIX(MME)) and N-methylimidazole (MeIm). Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions of these model compounds have been examined in acetonitrile solvent. (PPIX(MME))Fe(III)(MeIm)(2)-propionate (Fe(III)~CO(2)) is readily reduced by the ascorbate derivative 5,6-isopropylidine ascorbate to give (PPIX(MME))Fe(II)(MeIm)(2)-propionic acid (Fe(II)~CO(2)H). An excess of the hydroxylamine TEMPOH or of hydroquinone similarly reduces Fe(III)~CO(2), and TEMPO and benzoquinone oxidize Fe(II)~CO(2)H to return to Fe(III)~CO(2). The measured equilibrium constants, and the determined pK(a) and E(1/2) values, indicate that Fe(II)~CO(2)H has an effective bond dissociation free energy (BDFE) of 67.8 ± 0.6 kcal mol(-1). In these PPIX models, electron transfer occurs at the iron center and proton transfer occurs at the remote heme propionate. According to thermochemical and other arguments, the TEMPOH reaction occurs by concerted proton-electron transfer (CPET), and a similar pathway is indicated for the ascorbate derivative. Based on these results, heme propionates should be considered as potential key components of PCET/CPET active sites in heme proteins.

Concerted proton-electron transfer in a ruthenium terpyridyl-benzoate system with a large separation between the redox and basic sites

To understand how the separation between the electron and proton-accepting sites affects proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactivity, we have prepared ruthenium complexes with 4'-(4-carboxyphenyl)terpyridine ligands, and studied reactivity with hydrogen atom donors (H-X). Ru(II)(pydic)(tpy-PhCOOH) (Ru(II)PhCOOH), was synthesized in one pot from [(p-cymene)RuCl(2)](2), sodium 4'-(4-carboxyphenyl)-2,2':6',2''-terpyridine ([Na(+)]tpy-PhCOO(-)), and disodium pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate (Na(2)pydic). Ru(II)PhCOOH plus (n)Bu(4)NOH in DMF yields the deprotonated Ru(II) complex, (n)Bu(4)N[Ru(II)(pydic)(tpy-PhCOO)] (Ru(II)PhCOO(-)). The Ru(III) complex (Ru(III)PhCOO) has been isolated by one-electron oxidation of Ru(II)PhCOO(-) with triarylaminium radical cations (NAr(3)(*+)). The bond dissociation free energy (BDFE) of the O-H bond in Ru(II)PhCOOH is calculated from pK(a) and E(1/2) measurements as 87 kcal mol(-1), making Ru(III)PhCOO a strong hydrogen atom acceptor. There are 10 bonds and ca. 11.2 A separating the metal from the carboxylate basic site in Ru(III)PhCOO. Even with this separation, Ru(III)PhCOO oxidizes the hydrogen atom donor TEMPOH (BDFE = 66.5 kcal mol(-1), DeltaG(o)(rxn) = -21 kcal mol(-1)) by removal of an electron and a proton to form Ru(II)PhCOOH and TEMPO radical in a concerted proton-electron transfer (CPET) process. The second order rate constant for this reaction is (1.1 +/- 0.1) x 10(5) M(-1) s(-1) with k(H)/k(D) = 2.1 +/- 0.2, similar to the observed kinetics in an analogous system without the phenyl spacer, Ru(III)(pydic)(tpy-COO(-)) (Ru(III)COO). In contrast, hydrogen transfer from 2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-methoxyphenol [(t)Bu(2)(OMe)ArOH] to Ru(III)PhCOO is several orders of magnitude slower than the analogous reaction with Ru(III)COO.

Slow hydrogen atom transfer reactions of oxo- and hydroxo-vanadium compounds: the importance of intrinsic barriers

Reactions are described that interconvert vanadium(IV) oxo-hydroxo complexes [V(IV)O(OH)(R(2)bpy)(2)]BF(4) (1a-c) and vanadium(V) dioxo complexes [V(V)O(2)(R(2)bpy)(2)]BF(4) (2a-c) [R(2)bpy = 4,4'-di-tert-butyl-2,2'-bipyridine ((t)Bu(2)bpy), a; 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine (Me(2)bpy), b; 2,2'-bipyridine (bpy), c]. These are rare examples of pairs of isolated, sterically unencumbered, first-row metal-oxo/hydroxo complexes that differ by a hydrogen atom (H(+) + e(-)). The V(IV)-(t)Bu(2)bpy derivative 1a has a useful (1)H NMR spectrum, despite being paramagnetic. Complex 2a abstracts H(*) from organic substrates with weak O-H and C-H bonds, converting 2,6-(t)Bu(2)-4-MeO-C(6)H(2)OH (ArOH) and 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-N-hydroxypiperidine (TEMPOH) to their corresponding radicals ArO(*) and TEMPO, hydroquinone to benzoquinone, and dihydroanthracene to anthracene. The equilibrium constant for 2a + ArOH <==> 1a + ArO(*) is (4 +/- 2) x 10(-3), implying that the VO-H bond dissociation free energy (BDFE) is 70.6 +/- 1.2 kcal mol(-1). Consistent with this value, 1a is oxidized by 2,4,6-(t)Bu(3)C(6)H(2)O(*). All of these reactions are surprisingly slow, typically occurring over hours at ambient temperatures. The net hydrogen-atom pseudo-self-exchange 1a + 2b <==> 2a + 1b, using the (t)Bu- and Me-bpy substituents as labels, also occurs slowly, with k(se) = 1.3 x 10(-2) M(-1) s(-1) at 298 K, DeltaH(double dagger) = 15 +/- 2 kcal mol(-1), and DeltaS(double dagger) = 16 +/- 5 cal mol(-1) K. Using this k(se) and the BDFE, the vanadium reactions are shown to follow the Marcus cross relation moderately well, with calculated rate constants within 10(2) of the observed values. The vanadium self-exchange reaction is ca. 10(6) slower than that for the related Ru(IV)O(py)(bpy)(2)(2+)/Ru(III)OH(py)(bpy)(2)(2+) self-exchange. The origin of this dramatic difference has been probed with DFT calculations on the self-exchange reactions of 1c + 2c and on monocationic ruthenium complexes with pyrrolate or fluoride in place of the py ligands. The calculations reproduce the difference in barrier heights and show that transfer of a hydrogen atom involves more structural reorganization for vanadium than the Ru analogues. The vanadium complexes have larger changes in the metal-oxo and metal-hydroxo bond lengths, which is traced to the difference in d-orbital occupancy in the two systems. This study thus highlights the importance of intrinsic barriers in the transfer of a hydrogen atom, in addition to the thermochemical (bond strength) factors that have been previously emphasized.

Trends in ground-state entropies for transition metal based hydrogen atom transfer reactions

Reported herein are thermochemical studies of hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactions involving transition metal H-atom donors M(II)LH and oxyl radicals. [Fe(II)(H(2)bip)(3)](2+), [Fe(II)(H(2)bim)(3)](2+), [Co(II)(H(2)bim)(3)](2+), and Ru(II)(acac)(2)(py-imH) [H(2)bip = 2,2'-bi-1,4,5,6-tetrahydropyrimidine, H(2)bim = 2,2'-bi-imidazoline, acac = 2,4-pentandionato, py-imH = 2-(2'-pyridyl)imidazole)] each react with TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinoxyl) or (t)Bu(3)PhO(*) (2,4,6-tri-tert-butylphenoxyl) to give the deprotonated, oxidized metal complex M(III)L and TEMPOH or (t)Bu(3)PhOH. Solution equilibrium measurements for the reaction of [Co(II)(H(2)bim)(3)](2+) with TEMPO show a large, negative ground-state entropy for hydrogen atom transfer, -41 +/- 2 cal mol(-1) K(-1). This is even more negative than the DeltaS(o)(HAT) = -30 +/- 2 cal mol(-1) K(-1) for the two iron complexes and the DeltaS(o)(HAT) for Ru(II)(acac)(2)(py-imH) + TEMPO, 4.9 +/- 1.1 cal mol(-1) K(-1), as reported earlier. Calorimetric measurements quantitatively confirm the enthalpy of reaction for [Fe(II)(H(2)bip)(3)](2+) + TEMPO, thus also confirming DeltaS(o)(HAT). Calorimetry on TEMPOH + (t)Bu(3)PhO(*) gives DeltaH(o)(HAT) = -11.2 +/- 0.5 kcal mol(-1) which matches the enthalpy predicted from the difference in literature solution BDEs. A brief evaluation of the literature thermochemistry of TEMPOH and (t)Bu(3)PhOH supports the common assumption that DeltaS(o)(HAT) approximately 0 for HAT reactions of organic and small gas-phase molecules. However, this assumption does not hold for transition metal based HAT reactions. The trend in magnitude of |DeltaS(o)(HAT)| for reactions with TEMPO, Ru(II)(acac)(2)(py-imH) << [Fe(II)(H(2)bip)(3)](2+) = [Fe(II)(H(2)bim)(3)](2+) < [Co(II)(H(2)bim)(3)](2+), is surprisingly well predicted by the trends for electron transfer half-reaction entropies, DeltaS(o)(ET), in aprotic solvents. This is because both DeltaS(o)(ET) and DeltaS(o)(HAT) have substantial contributions from vibrational entropy, which varies significantly with the metal center involved. The close connection between DeltaS(o)(HAT) and DeltaS(o)(ET) provides an important link between these two fields and provides a starting point from which to predict which HAT systems will have important ground-state entropy effects.

Hydrogen atom transfer reactions of a ruthenium imidazole complex: hydrogen tunneling and the applicability of the Marcus cross relation

The reaction of Ru(II)(acac)2(py-imH) (Ru(II)imH) with TEMPO(*) (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical) in MeCN quantitatively gives Ru(III)(acac)2(py-im) (Ru(III)im) and the hydroxylamine TEMPO-H by transfer of H(*) (H(+) + e(-)) (acac = 2,4-pentanedionato, py-imH = 2-(2'-pyridyl)imidazole). Kinetic measurements of this reaction by UV-vis stopped-flow techniques indicate a bimolecular rate constant k(3H) = 1400 +/- 100 M(-1) s(-1) at 298 K. The reaction proceeds via a concerted hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) mechanism, as shown by ruling out the stepwise pathways of initial proton or electron transfer due to their very unfavorable thermochemistry (Delta G(o)). Deuterium transfer from Ru(II)(acac)2(py-imD) (Ru(II)imD) to TEMPO(*) is surprisingly much slower at k(3D) = 60 +/- 7 M(-1) s(-1), with k(3H)/k(3D) = 23 +/- 3 at 298 K. Temperature-dependent measurements of this deuterium kinetic isotope effect (KIE) show a large difference between the apparent activation energies, E(a3D) - E(a3H) = 1.9 +/- 0.8 kcal mol(-1). The large k(3H)/k(3D) and DeltaE(a) values appear to be greater than the semiclassical limits and thus suggest a tunneling mechanism. The self-exchange HAT reaction between Ru(II)imH and Ru(III)im, measured by (1)H NMR line broadening, occurs with k(4H) = (3.2 +/- 0.3) x 10(5) M(-1) s(-1) at 298 K and k(4H)/k(4D) = 1.5 +/- 0.2. Despite the small KIE, tunneling is suggested by the ratio of Arrhenius pre-exponential factors, log(A(4H)/A(4D)) = -0.5 +/- 0.3. These data provide a test of the applicability of the Marcus cross relation for H and D transfers, over a range of temperatures, for a reaction that involves substantial tunneling. The cross relation calculates rate constants for Ru(II)imH(D) + TEMPO(*) that are greater than those observed: k(3H,calc)/k(3H) = 31 +/- 4 and k(3D,calc)/k(3D) = 140 +/- 20 at 298 K. In these rate constants and in the activation parameters, there is a better agreement with the Marcus cross relation for H than for D transfer, despite the greater prevalence of tunneling for H. The cross relation does not explicitly include tunneling, so close agreement should not be expected. In light of these results, the strengths and weaknesses of applying the cross relation to HAT reactions are discussed.