5'-N-substituted carboxamidoadenosines as agonists for adenosine receptors

NECA derivatives exploit the paralog-specific properties of the site 3 side pocket of Grp94, the endoplasmic reticulum Hsp90

The hsp90 chaperones govern the function of essential client proteins critical for normal cell function as well as cancer initiation and progression. Hsp90 activity is driven by ATP, which binds to the N-terminal domain and induces large conformational changes that are required for client maturation. Inhibitors targeting the ATP-binding pocket of the N-terminal domain have anticancer effects, but most bind with similar affinity to cytosolic Hsp90α and Hsp90β, endoplasmic reticulum Grp94, and mitochondrial Trap1, the four cellular hsp90 paralogs. Paralog-specific inhibitors may lead to drugs with fewer side effects. The ATP-binding pockets of the four paralogs are flanked by three side pockets, termed sites 1, 2, and 3, which differ between the paralogs in their accessibility to inhibitors. Previous insights into the principles governing access to sites 1 and 2 have resulted in development of paralog-selective inhibitors targeting these sites, but the rules for selective targeting of site 3 are less clear. Earlier studies identified 5'N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine (NECA) as a Grp94-selective ligand. Here we use NECA and its derivatives to probe the properties of site 3. We found that derivatives that lengthen the 5' moiety of NECA improve selectivity for Grp94 over Hsp90α. Crystal structures reveal that the derivatives extend further into site 3 of Grp94 compared with their parent compound and that selectivity is due to paralog-specific differences in ligand pose and ligand-induced conformational strain in the protein. These studies provide a structural basis for Grp94-selective inhibition using site 3.

N6-Substituted 5'-N-Methylcarbamoyl-4'-selenoadenosines as Potent and Selective A3 Adenosine Receptor Agonists with Unusual Sugar Puckering and Nucleobase Orientation

Potent and selective A₃ adenosine receptor (AR) agonists were identified by the replacement of 4'-oxo- or 4'-thionucleosides with bioisosteric selenium. Unlike previous agonists, 4'-seleno analogues preferred a glycosidic syn conformation and South sugar puckering, as shown in the X-ray crystal structure of 5'-N-methylcarbamoyl derivative 3p. Among the compounds tested, N⁶-3-iodobenzyl analogue 3d was found to be the most potent A₃AR full agonist (K_i = 0.57 nM), which was ≥800- and 1900-fold selective for A₁AR and A_2AAR, respectively. In the N⁶-cycloalkyl series, 2-Cl analogues generally exhibited better hA₃AR affinity than 2-H analogues, whereas 2-H > 2-Cl in the N⁶-3-halobenzyl series. N⁷ isomers 3t and 3u were much weaker in binding than corresponding N⁹ isomers, but compound 3t lacked A₃AR activation, appearing to be a weak antagonist. 2-Cl-N⁶-3-iodobenzyl analogue 3p inhibited chemoattractant-induced migration of microglia/monocytes without inducing cell death at ≤50 μM. This suggests the potential for the development of 4'-selenonucleoside A₃AR agonists as novel antistroke agents.

Paralog Specific Hsp90 Inhibitors - A Brief History and a Bright Future

BACKGROUND

The high sequence and structural homology among the hsp90 paralogs - Hsp90α, Hsp90β, Grp94, and Trap-1 - has made the development of paralog-specific inhibitors a challenging proposition.

OBJECTIVE

This review surveys the state of developments in structural analysis, compound screening, and structure-based design that have been brought to bear on this problem.

RESULTS

First generation compounds that selectively bind to Hsp90, Grp94, or Trap-1 have been identified.

CONCLUSION

With the proof of principle firmly established, the prospects for further progress are bright.

Synthesis and general biological activity of a small adenosine-5'-(carboxamide and sulfanilamide) library

A small library of fifty-five adenosine peptide analogs was synthesized, under the Pilot Scale Library (PSL) Program of the NIH Roadmap initiative, from 2',3'-O-isopropylideneadenosine-5'-carboxylic acid 2. The coupling of amine or sulfanilamide reactants to the free 5'-carboxylic acid moiety of 2, in automated solution-phase fashion, led after acid-mediated hydrolysis to target compounds 3-57 in good yields and high purity. No marked anticancer or antimalarial activity was noted on preliminary cellular testing. Initial screening through the MLPCN program, however, indicates that these analogs may show diverse and interesting biological activities.

Synthesis of novel peptidyl adenosine antibiotic analogs

A small library of peptidyl adenosine antibiotic analogs was synthesized, under the Pilot Scale Library Program of the NIH Roadmap initiative, from 2',3'-O-isoproylideneadenosine-5'-carboxylic acid 2 in excellent yield. The coupling of the amino terminus of L-2-aminophenylbutyric methyl ester to a free 5'-carboxylic acid moiety of 2 followed by sodium hydroxide treatment led to carboxylic acid analog 4. Hydrolysis of this latter gave unprotected nucleoside analog 5. Intermediate 4 served as the precursor for the preparation of novel peptidyl adenosine analogs 6-18 in good yields and high purity through peptide coupling reactions to diverse amine derivatives. No marked anticancer and antimalaria activity was noted on preliminary cellular testing; however these analogs should be useful candidates for other types of biological activity.

Parallel solution-phase synthesis and general biological activity of a uridine antibiotic analog library

A small library of ninety four uridine antibiotic analogs was synthesized, under the Pilot Scale Library (PSL) Program of the NIH Roadmap initiative, from amine 2 and carboxylic acids 33 and 77 in solution-phase fashion. Diverse aldehyde, sulfonyl chloride, and carboxylic acid reactant sets were condensed to 2, leading after acid-mediated hydrolysis, to the targeted compounds 3–32 in good yields and high purity. Similarly, treatment of 33 with diverse amines and sulfonamides gave 34–75. The coupling of the amino terminus of d-phenylalanine methyl ester to the free 5′-carboxylic acid moiety of 33 followed by sodium hydroxide treatment led to carboxylic acid analog 77. Hydrolysis of this material gave analog 78. The intermediate 77 served as the precursor for the preparation of novel dipeptidyl uridine analogs 79–99 through peptide coupling reactions to diverse amine reactants. None of the described compounds show significant anticancer or antimalarial acivity. A number of samples exhibited a variety of promising inhibitory, agonist, antagonist, or activator properties with enzymes and receptors in primary screens supplied and reported through the NIH MLPCN program.

Optimization of adenosine 5'-carboxamide derivatives as adenosine receptor agonists using structure-based ligand design and fragment screening

Structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have a proven utility in the discovery of new antagonists and inverse agonists modulating signaling of this important family of clinical targets. Applicability of active-state GPCR structures to virtual screening and rational optimization of agonists, however, remains to be assessed. In this study of adenosine 5' derivatives, we evaluated the performance of an agonist-bound A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) structure in retrieval of known agonists and then employed the structure to screen for new fragments optimally fitting the corresponding subpocket. Biochemical and functional assays demonstrate high affinity of new derivatives that include polar heterocycles. The binding models also explain modest selectivity gain for some substituents toward the closely related A(1)AR subtype and the modified agonist efficacy of some of these ligands. The study suggests further applicability of in silico fragment screening to rational lead optimization in GPCRs.

Ligand binding and subtype selectivity of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor: identification and characterization of essential amino acid residues

The crystal structure of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor bound to the A(2A) receptor-specific antagonist, ZM241385, was recently determined at 2.6-A resolution. Surprisingly, the antagonist binds in an extended conformation, perpendicular to the plane of the membrane, and indicates a number of interactions unidentified before in ZM241385 recognition. To further understand the selectivity of ZM241385 for the human A(2A) adenosine receptor, we examined the effect of mutating amino acid residues within the binding cavity likely to have key interactions and that have not been previously examined. Mutation of Phe-168 to Ala abolishes both agonist and antagonist binding as well as receptor activity, whereas mutation of this residue to Trp or Tyr had only moderate effects. The Met-177 --> Ala mutation impeded antagonist but not agonist binding. Finally, the Leu-249 --> Ala mutant showed neither agonist nor antagonist binding affinity. From our results and previously published mutagenesis data, we conclude that conserved residues Phe-168(5.29), Glu-169(5.30), Asn-253(6.55), and Leu-249(6.51) play a central role in coordinating the bicyclic core present in both agonists and antagonists. By combining the analysis of the mutagenesis data with a comparison of the sequences of different adenosine receptor subtypes from different species, we predict that the interactions that determine subtype selectivity reside in the more divergent "upper" region of the binding cavity while the "lower" part of the binding cavity is conserved across adenosine receptor subtypes.

Recent improvements in the development of A(2B) adenosine receptor agonists

Adenosine is known to exert most of its physiological functions by acting as local modulator at four receptor subtypes named A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3) (ARs). Principally as a result of the difficulty in identifying potent and selective agonists, the A(2B) AR is the least extensively characterised of the adenosine receptors family. Despite these limitations, growing understanding of the physiological meaning of this target indicates promising therapeutic perspectives for specific ligands. As A(2B) AR signalling seems to be associated with pre/postconditioning cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, selective agonists may represent a new therapeutic group for patients suffering from coronary artery disease. Herein we present an overview of the recent advancements in identifying potent and selective A(2B) AR agonists reported in scientific and patent literature. These compounds can be classified into adenosine-like and nonadenosine ligands. Nucleoside-based agonists are the result of modifying adenosine by substitution at the N (6)-, C(2)-positions of the purine heterocycle and/or at the 5'-position of the ribose moiety or combinations of these substitutions. Compounds 1-deoxy-1-{6-[N'-(furan-2-carbonyl)-hydrazino]-9H-purin-9-yl}-N-ethyl-beta-D-ribofuranuronamide (19, hA(1) K (i) = 1050 nM, hA(2A) K (i) = 1550 nM, hA(2B) EC(50) = 82 nM, hA(3) K (i) > 5 muM) and its 2-chloro analogue 23 (hA(1) K (i) = 3500 nM, hA(2A) K (i) = 4950 nM, hA(2B) EC(50) = 210 nM, hA(3) K (i) > 5 muM) were confirmed to be potent and selective full agonists in a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) functional assay in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing hA(2B) AR. Nonribose ligands are represented by conveniently substituted dicarbonitrilepyridines, among which 2-[6-amino-3,5-dicyano-4-[4-(cyclopropylmethoxy)phenyl]pyridin-2-ylsulfanyl]acetamide (BAY-60-6583, hA(1), hA(2A), hA(3) EC(50) > 10 muM; hA(2B) EC(50) = 3 nM) is currently under preclinical-phase investigation for treating coronary artery disorders and atherosclerosis.

Recent developments in adenosine A2A receptor ligands

The development of potent and selective agonists and antagonists of adenosine receptors (ARs) has been a target of medicinal chemistry research for several decades, and recently the US Food and Drug Administration has approved Lexiscan, an adenosine derivative substituted at the 2 position, for use as a pharmacologic stress agent in radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging. Currently, some other adenosine A(2A) receptor (A(2A)AR) agonists and antagonists are undergoing preclinical testing and clinical trials. While agonists are potent antiinflammatory agents also showing hypotensive effects, antagonists are being developed for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.However, since there are still major problems in this field, including side effects, low brain penetration (for the targeting of CNS diseases), short half-life, or lack of in vivo effects, the design and development of new AR ligands is a hot research topic.This review presents an update on the medicinal chemistry of A(2A)AR agonists and antagonists, and stresses the strong need for more selective ligands at the human A(2A)AR subtype, in particular in the case of agonists.

Recent improvements in the development of A(2B) adenosine receptor agonists

Adenosine is known to exert most of its physiological functions by acting as local modulator at four receptor subtypes named A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3) (ARs). Principally as a result of the difficulty in identifying potent and selective agonists, the A(2B) AR is the least extensively characterised of the adenosine receptors family. Despite these limitations, growing understanding of the physiological meaning of this target indicates promising therapeutic perspectives for specific ligands. As A(2B) AR signalling seems to be associated with pre/postconditioning cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory mechanisms, selective agonists may represent a new therapeutic group for patients suffering from coronary artery disease. Herein we present an overview of the recent advancements in identifying potent and selective A(2B) AR agonists reported in scientific and patent literature. These compounds can be classified into adenosine-like and nonadenosine ligands. Nucleoside-based agonists are the result of modifying adenosine by substitution at the N (6)-, C(2)-positions of the purine heterocycle and/or at the 5'-position of the ribose moiety or combinations of these substitutions. Compounds 1-deoxy-1-{6-[N'-(furan-2-carbonyl)-hydrazino]-9H-purin-9-yl}-N-ethyl-beta-D-ribofuranuronamide (19, hA(1) K (i) = 1050 nM, hA(2A) K (i) = 1550 nM, hA(2B) EC(50) = 82 nM, hA(3) K (i) > 5 muM) and its 2-chloro analogue 23 (hA(1) K (i) = 3500 nM, hA(2A) K (i) = 4950 nM, hA(2B) EC(50) = 210 nM, hA(3) K (i) > 5 muM) were confirmed to be potent and selective full agonists in a cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) functional assay in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing hA(2B) AR. Nonribose ligands are represented by conveniently substituted dicarbonitrilepyridines, among which 2-[6-amino-3,5-dicyano-4-[4-(cyclopropylmethoxy)phenyl]pyridin-2-ylsulfanyl]acetamide (BAY-60-6583, hA(1), hA(2A), hA(3) EC(50) > 10 muM; hA(2B) EC(50) = 3 nM) is currently under preclinical-phase investigation for treating coronary artery disorders and atherosclerosis.

Highlights on the development of A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists

Although significant progress has been made in the past few decades demonstrating that adenosine modulates a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes through the interaction with four subtypes of a family of cell-surface G-protein-coupled receptors, clinical evaluation of some adenosine receptor ligands has been discontinued. Major problems include side effects due to the wide distribution of adenosine receptors, low brain penetration (which is important for the targeting of CNS diseases), short half-life of compounds, or a lack of effects, in some cases perhaps due to receptor desensitization or to low receptor density in the targeted tissue. Currently, three A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists have begun phase III studies. Two of them are therapeutically evaluated as pharmacologic stress agents and the third proved to be effective in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury (SCI), while avoiding the adverse effects of steroid agents. On the other hand, the great interest in the field of A(2A) adenosine receptor antagonists is related to their application in neurodegenerative disorders, in particular, Parkinson's disease, and some of them are currently in various stages of evaluation. This review presents an update of medicinal chemistry and molecular recognition of A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists, and stresses the strong need for more selective ligands at the A(2A) human subtype.

Computer aided comparative analysis of the binding modes of the adenosine receptor agonists for all known subtypes of adenosine receptors

Molecular models of all known subtypes (A1, A2A, A2B, and A3) of the human adenosine receptors were built in homology with bovine rhodopsin. These models include the transmembrane domain as well as all extracellular and intracellular hydrophilic loops and terminal domains. The molecular docking of adenosine and 46 selected derivatives was performed for each receptor subtype. A binding mode common for all studied agonists was proposed, and possible explanations for differences in the ligand activities were suggested.

Coupling of the human A1 adenosine receptor to different heterotrimeric G proteins: evidence for agonist-specific G protein activation

The present study investigates the effect of varying ligand structure on the ability of agonists to activate guanine nucleotide-binding proteins of the Gi, Gs and Gq families via the A(1) adenosine receptor. In CHO cells expressing this receptor, inhibition or potentiation of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation was used as an end point to measure the activation of Gi and, in Pertussis toxin (PTX)-treated cells, Gs, respectively. Stimulation of inositol phosphate accumulation in PTX-treated cells was used as an index of Gq activation. CPA (N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine), NECA (5'-N-ethyl-carboxyamidoadenosine) and eight analogues of these ligands presented a range of guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G-protein)-activating profiles. Some ligands could only activate Gi (e.g. 2'deoxyCPA), some primarily Gi and Gs (and only weakly Gq) (e.g. 3'deoxyCPA), highlighting the importance of the ribose hydroxyls in agonist activation of multiple G proteins. CHA (N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine) activated Gi, Gs and Gq, but was more efficacious than CPA in activating Gs. The NECA analogues 5'-N-cyclopropyl-carboxamidoadenosine, 5'-N-cyclobutyl-carboxamidoadenosine and 5'-N-cyclopentyl-carboxamidoadenosine (CPeCA) also activated all three G proteins, although their ability to activate Gs and Gq (relative to CPA) was reduced with increasing substituent size, such that CPeCA produced only a small stimulation (at 100 microM) at Gq, but was a full agonist, relative to CPA, at Gi and Gs. This study suggests that the A(1) adenosine receptor can adopt agonist-specific conformations, arising from small changes in ligand structure, which lead to the differential activation of Gi, Gs and Gq.

Comparative Analysis of Putative Agonist-Binding Modes in the Human A1 Adenosine Receptor

A recent study reported a model of the human A(1) adenosine receptor and its agonist binding site, proposing two putative binding modes in the same binding site for the natural agonist, adenosine. The present work investigates the flexibility of this binding site by exhaustive exploration with the natural agonist and with three other adenosine derivatives: N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), and 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA). Our aim was to find a common binding mode for agonists that would explain the role in the binding process of the different substitutions allowed at the 2, N6, and 5' positions of adenosine. This problem was addressed through docking simulations, molecular dynamics studies, and estimations of the ligand-binding free energy with both the AUTODOCK scoring function and the linear interaction energy (LIE) approach. The results point to a single receptor-binding position that explains the effects of the different chemical modifications on the adenosine derivatives considered here.

Random mutagenesis of the human adenosine A2B receptor followed by growth selection in yeast. Identification of constitutively active and gain of function mutations

To gain insight in spontaneous as well as agonist-induced activation of the human adenosine A2B receptor, we applied a random mutagenesis approach in yeast to create a large number of receptor mutants and selected mutants of interest with a robust screening assay based on growth. The amino acid sequence of 14 mutated receptors was determined. All these mutated receptors displayed constitutive activity. In particular, single-point mutations at T42A, V54L, and F84S and a triple-point mutation at N36S, T42A, and T66A resulted in high constitutive activity. In addition, a C-terminally truncated (after Lys269) mutant, Q214L I230N V240M V250M N254Y T257S K269stop, was highly constitutively active. The T42A, V54L, and F84S mutants showed a considerable decrease, 4.9- to 6.9-fold, in the EC50 value of 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), an adenosine analog. Combined mutation of I242T, K269R, V284A, and H302Q, as well as F84L together with S95G, resulted in an even greater potency of NECA of 10- and 18-fold, respectively. In fact, all constitutively active mutants had an increased potency for NECA. This suggests that the wild-type (wt) human A2B receptor itself is rather silent, which may explain the low affinity of agonists for this receptor. To verify the ability of the mutant receptors to activate mammalian second messenger systems, cAMP experiments were performed in CHO cells stably expressing the wt and T42A receptors. These experiments confirmed the increased sensitivity of T42A for NECA, because the EC50 values of T42A and the wt receptor were 0.15 +/- 0.04 and 1.3 +/- 0.4 microM, respectively.

2,5'-Disubstituted adenosine derivatives: evaluation of selectivity and efficacy for the adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptor

Novel 2,5'-disubstituted adenosine derivatives were synthesized in good overall yields starting from commercially available guanosine. Binding affinities were determined for rat adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors and human A(3) receptors. E(max) values were determined for the stimulation or inhibition of cAMP production in CHO cells expressing human adenosine A(2A) (EC(50) values as well) or A(3) receptors, respectively. The compounds displayed affinities in the nanomolar range for both the adenosine A(2A) and A(3) receptor, without substantial preference for either receptor. The derivatives with a 2-(1-hexynyl) group had the highest affinities for both receptors; compound 4 (2-(1-hexynyl)adenosine) had the highest affinity for the adenosine A(2A) receptor with a K(i) value of 6 nM (A(3)/A(2A) selectivity ratio of approximately 3), whereas compound 37 (2-(1-hexynyl)-5'-S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine) had the highest affinity for the adenosine A(3) receptor with a K(i) value of 15 nM (A(2A)/A(3) selectivity ratio of 4). In general, compounds with a relatively small 5'-S-alkyl-5'-thio substituent (methyl-5'-thio) displayed the highest affinities for both the adenosine A(2A) and A(3) receptor; the larger ones (n- or i-propyl-5'-thio) increased the selectivity for the adenosine A(3) receptor. The novel compounds were also evaluated in cAMP assays for their (partial) agonistic behavior. Overall, the disubstituted derivatives behaved as partial agonists for both the adenosine A(2A) and A(3) receptor. The compounds showed somewhat higher intrinsic activities on the adenosine A(2A) receptor than on the A(3) receptor. Compounds 37, 40 and 45, 48, with either a 5'-S-methyl-5'-thio or a 5'-S-i-propyl-5'-thio substituent had the lowest intrinsic activities on the adenosine A(2A) receptor. For the A(3) receptor, compounds 34, 35, 38, 39, and 46, 47, with a 5'-S-ethyl-5'-thio or a 5'-S-n-propyl-5'-thio substituent had the lowest intrinsic activities.

3-Aryl[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a]benzimidazol-4(10H)-ones: a new class of selective A1 adenosine receptor antagonists

Radioligand binding assays using bovine cortical membrane preparations and biochemical in vitro studies revealed that various 3-aryl[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a]benzimidazol-4(10H)-one (ATBI) derivatives, previously reported by us as ligands of the central benzodiazepine receptor (BzR) (Primofiore, G.; et al. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 96-102), behaved as antagonists at the A1 adenosine receptor (A1AR). Alkylation of the nitrogen at position 10 of the triazinobenzimidazole nucleus conferred selectivity for the A1AR vs the BzR. The most potent ligand of the ATBI series (10-methyl-3-phenyl[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a]benzimidazol-4(10H)-one 12) displayed a Ki value of 63 nM at the A1AR without binding appreciably to the adenosine A2A and A3 nor to the benzodiazepine receptor. Pharmacophore-based modeling studies in which 12 was compared against a set of well-established A1AR antagonists suggested that three hydrogen bonding sites (HB1 acceptor, HB2 and HB3 donors) and three lipophilic pockets (L1, L2, and L3) might be available to antagonists within the A1AR binding cleft. According to the proposed pharmacophore scheme, the lead compound 12 engages interactions with the HB2 site (via the N2 nitrogen) as well as with the L2 and L3 sites (through the pendant and the fused benzene rings). The results of these studies prompted the replacement of the methyl with more lipophilic groups at the 10-position (to fill the putative L1 lipophilic pocket) as a strategy to improve A1AR affinity. Among the new compounds synthesized and tested, the 3,10-diphenyl[1,2,4]triazino[4,3-a]benzimidazol-4(10H)-one (23) was characterized by a Ki value of 18 nM which represents a 3.5-fold gain of A1AR affinity compared with the lead 12. A rhodopsin-based model of the bovine adenosine A1AR was built to highlight the binding mode of 23 and two well-known A1AR antagonists (III and VII) and to guide future lead optimization projects. In our docking simulations, 23 receives a hydrogen bond (via the N1 nitrogen) from the side chain of Asn247 (corresponding to the HB1 and HB2 sites) and fills the L1, L2, and L3 lipophilic pockets with the 10-phenyl, 3-phenyl, and fused benzene rings, respectively.

Nucleosides and nucleotides. 200. Reinvestigation of 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine derivatives: structure-activity relationships for P(3) purinoceptor-like proteins

The non-P(1) and non-P(2) muscle relaxant effect of ATP in rabbit thoracic aorta has recently been attributed to a putative P(3) purinoceptor, which is activated by either adenosine or ATP. Since the physiological roles of this putative P(3) purinoceptor and of a new [(3)H]-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA)-binding protein from rat brain membranes called P(3) purinoceptor-like protein (P(3)LP), due to its ligand specificity, have not been fully elucidated, we needed a specific ligand to obtain further information about the receptor. We examined the structure-activity relationship (SAR) of various 5'-N-substituted-carboxamidoadenosine derivatives toward P(3)LP and discovered a hydrophobic binding region near the 5'-N-substituted-carboxamide group. From the linear alkyl N-substituted derivatives, the N-n-pentyl derivative 10 was found to be the most potent ligand with a K(i) value of 12 nM. In the series of the N-cycloalkyl derivatives, the N-cyclohexyl derivative 27 was the strongest ligand with a K(i) value of 18 nM. On the other hand, the N-substituents having branched alkyl side chains and bulky cycloalkyl groups did not show any potent affinities for P(3)LP. Therefore, the hydrophobic pocket accommodates approximately a 10-carbon-atom-long linear alkyl side chain, while a considerably stronger hydrophobic binding region of about a 5-carbon-atom-long depth exists near the nitrogen atom of the amide group. This pocket also allows substitution with bulky hydrophobic groups since the 5'-N-cycloalkyl derivatives have high affinities. We also examined the receptor selectivity for the selected nucleosides 10 and 27 with 1 [9-(6,7-dideoxy-beta-D-allo-hept-5-ynofuranosyl)adenine, HAK2701] and NECA versus P(1) purinoceptor subtypes, such as adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3) receptors, and found that 27 is the most selective ligand for P(3)LP.

Why are A(2B) receptors low-affinity adenosine receptors? Mutation of Asn273 to Tyr increases affinity of human A(2B) receptor for 2-(1-Hexynyl)adenosine

Adenosine A(2B) receptors are known as low-affinity receptors due to their modest-to-negligible affinity for adenosine and prototypic agonists. Despite numerous synthetic efforts, 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) still is the reference agonist, albeit nonselective for this receptor. In our search for higher affinity agonists, we developed decision schemes to select amino acids for mutation to the corresponding residues in the most homologous, higher affinity, human A(2A) receptor. One scheme exploited knowledge on sequence alignments and modeling data and yielded three residues, V11, L58, and F59, mutation of which did not affect agonist affinity. The second scheme combined knowledge on sequence alignments and mutation data and pointed to Ala12 and Asn273. Mutation of Ala12 to threonine did not affect the affinity for NECA, (R)-N(6)-(phenylisopropyl)adenosine (R-PIA), and 2Cl Ado. The affinity of the N273Y mutant for NECA and R-PIA and for the antagonists xanthine amine congener (XAC), ZM241385, and SCH58261 was also unaltered. However, this mutant had a slightly increased affinity for a 2-substituted adenosine derivative, CGS21680. This prompted us to investigate other 2-substituted adenosines, with selectivity and high affinity for A(2A) receptors. All four compounds tested had improved affinity for the N273Y receptor. Of these, 2-(1-hexynyl)adenosine had submicromolar affinity for the N273Y receptor, 0.18 +/- 0.10 microM, with a 61-fold affinity gain over the wt receptor. In addition, the non-NECA analog (S)-PHP adenosine had an affinity of 1.7 +/- 0.5 microM for the wt receptor. The high affinity of (S)-PHP adenosine for the wt receptor suggests that further modifications at the 2-position may yield agonists with even higher affinity for A(2B) receptors.

Adenosine-derived non-phosphate antagonists for P2Y(1) purinoceptors

Novel type antagonists for P2Y(1) adenine nucleotide receptors were synthesized by coupling of adenosine 5'-OH group with oligo-aspartate chain via a carbonyl linker. All these conjugates (AdoOC(O)Asp(n), n = 1-4) inhibited the 2MeSADP-stimulated synthesis of inositol phosphates in 1321N1 human astrocytoma cells stably expressing human P2Y(1) receptors. This inhibitory effect followed the rank order AdoOC(O)Asp(2)> AdoOC(O)Asp(3)> AdoOC(O)Asp(1)> AdoOC(O)Asp(4) with antagonistic constant pA(2) = 5.4 for AdoOC(O)Asp(2). Potency of this non-phosphate inhibitor was comparable with the previously known adenosine 3',5'- and 2', 5'-bisphosphates. Chemical and biological stabilities of these novel adenosine derived antagonists of the nucleotide receptor provide perspectives of their pharmacological implication.

A(3) adenosine receptor ligands: history and perspectives

Adenosine regulates many physiological functions through specific cell membrane receptors. On the basis of pharmacological studies and molecular cloning, four different adenosine receptors have been identified and classified as A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3). These adenosine receptors are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family. While adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptor subtypes have been pharmacologically characterized through the use of selective ligands, the A(3) adenosine receptor subtype is presently under study in order to better understand its physio-pathological functions. Activation of adenosine A(3) receptors has been shown to stimulate phospholipase C and D and to inhibit adenylate cyclase. Activation of A(3) adenosine receptors also causes the release of inflammatory mediators such as histamine from mast cells. These mediators are responsible for processes such as inflammation and hypotension. It has also been suggested that the A(3) receptor plays an important role in brain ischemia, immunosuppression, and bronchospasm in several animal models. Based on these results, highly selective A(3) adenosine receptor agonists and/or antagonists have been indicated as potential drugs for the treatment of asthma and inflammation, while highly selective agonists have been shown to possess cardioprotective effects. The updated material related to this field of research has been rationalized and arranged in order to offer an overview of the topic.