Ferromagnetic Bonding: Properties of High-Spin Lithium Clusters n+1Lin (n = 2−12) Devoid of Electron Pairs

Bonding in the high spin lithium clusters: Non-nuclear attractors play a crucial role

The bonding in lithium high-spin clusters contradicts the usual chemical bonding concept since there are no electron pairs between the atoms, and they are bound with parallel spin electrons. Quantum theory of atoms in molecules and interacting quantum atom analysis (IQA) were used to investigate the nature of bonding in the high-spin Li n n + 1 n = 2 - 5 clusters. Our findings demonstrate that the non-nuclear attractors (NNAs) are an essential component of the high-spin lithium clusters and play a key role in keeping them stable. Based on IQA energy terms, an electrostatic destabilizing interaction between the lithium atoms works against the cluster formation. On the other hand, the interactions between lithium atoms and NNA basins are stabilizing and outweigh the lithium-lithium destabilizing effects. In fact, NNAs tend to draw lithium atoms together and stabilize the resulting cluster. The high-spin clusters of lithium can be regarded as electrostatically driven compounds since the electrostatic components are primarily responsible for the stabilizing interactions between NNAs and Li atoms. The only exception is ³ Li₂ , which lacks NNA and has a non-repellent lithium-lithium interaction. Indeed, in the ³ Li₂ , the interatomic electrostatic component is negligibly small, and the exchange-correlation term leads to a weak bonding interaction.

Stability of "No-Pair Ferromagnetic" Lithium Clusters

High-spin lithium clusters, ⁿ⁺¹Li_n (n = 2-21), have been systematically studied by using density functional theory. Although these high-spin clusters have no bonding electron pairs, they are stable with respect to isolated atoms. A set of 42 density functional theory functionals were benchmarked against CCSD(T)/cc-pVQZ results for clusters from the dimer to the hexamer. For these clusters, the strong non-additivity on the binding energy is analyzed employing a many-body energy decomposition scheme, concluding that most of the binding energy is due to a balance between the three- and four-body contributions. After a quality parameter had been defined, the LC-BP86 functional was identified as the most promising one for the description of high-spin lithium clusters. We employ the dependence of the second energy difference on cluster size to predict the formation of a higher-stability cluster.

Account of chemical bonding and enhanced reactivity of vanadium-doped rhodium clusters toward C–H activation: a DFT investigation

The chemical bonding and enhanced reactivity of vanadium-doped rhodium clusters toward C–H activation were investigated using DFT.

Insight into the structure and bonding of copper(i) iodide clusters and a cluster-based coordination polymer

The structure and chemical bonding pattern of selected copper(i) iodide clusters and a cluster-based coordination polymer are investigated using DFT.

Exploring the Structure, Energetic, and Magnetic Properties of Neutral Small Lithium Clusters Doped with Yttrium: Supermagnetic Atom Research

Density functional theory calculations based on magnetic and energetic stability criteria were performed to study a series of yttrium-doped lithium neutral clusters. A relativistic approximation was employed to properly describe the energy and multiplicity of the given clusters' fundamental states. The interaction of the 4d-Y atomic orbitals with the sp-Li states had an important role in the magnetic and energetic behavior of the selected systems. The spin density was concentrated over the yttrium atom regardless of the size of the cluster. Li7Y is a new stable superatom due to its enhanced magnetic properties.

Ferromagnetic bond of Li10 cluster: An alternative approach in terms of effective ferromagnetic sites

In this work, a model to explain the unusual stability of atomic lithium clusters in their highest spin multiplicity is presented and used to describe the ferromagnetic bonding of high-spin Li10 and Li8 clusters. The model associates the (lack of-)fitness of Heisenberg Hamiltonian with the degree of (de-)localization of the valence electrons in the cluster. It is shown that a regular Heisenberg Hamiltonian with four coupling constants cannot fully explain the energy of the different spin states. However, a more simple model in which electrons are located not at the position of the nuclei but at the position of the attractors of the electron localization function succeeds in explaining the energy spectrum and, at the same time, explains the ferromagnetic bond found by Shaik using arguments of valence bond theory. In this way, two different points of view, one more often used in physics, the Heisenberg model, and the other in chemistry, valence bond, come to the same answer to explain those atypical bonds.

On the Nature of Bonding in Parallel Spins in Monovalent Metal Clusters

As we approach the Lewis model centennial, it may be timely to discuss novel bonding motifs. Accordingly, this review discusses no-pair ferromagnetic (NPFM) bonds that hold together monovalent metallic atoms using exclusively parallel spins. Thus, without any traditional electron-pair bonds, the bonding energy per atom in these clusters can reach 20 kcal mol(-1). This review describes the origins of NPFM bonding using a valence bond (VB) analysis, which shows that this bonding motif arises from bound triplet electron pairs that are delocalized over all the close neighbors of a given atom in the cluster. The VB model accounts for the tendency of NPFM clusters to assume polyhedral shapes with rather high symmetry and for the very steep rise of the bonding energy per atom. The advent of NPFM clusters offers new horizons in chemistry of highly magnetic species sensitive to magnetic and electric fields.

Bonding with parallel spins: high-spin clusters of monovalent metal atoms

Bonding is a glue of chemical matter and is also a useful concept for designing new molecules. Despite the fact that electron pairing remains the bonding mechanism in the great majority of molecules, in the past few decades scientists have had a growing interest in discovering novel bonding motifs. As this Account shows, monovalent metallic atoms having exclusively parallel spins, such as (11)Li10, (11)Au10, and (11)Cu10, can nevertheless form strongly bound clusters, without having even one traditional bond due to electron pairing. These clusters, which also can be made chiral, have high magnetic moments. We refer to this type as no-pair ferromagnetic (NPFM) bonding, which characterizes the (n+1)Mn clusters, which were all predicted by theoretical computations. The small NPFM alkali clusters that have been "synthesized" to date, using cold-atom techniques, support the computational predictions. In this Account, we describe the origins of NPFM bonding using a valence bond (VB) analysis, which shows that this bonding motif arises from bound triplet electron pairs that spread over all the close neighbors of a given atom in the cluster. The bound triplet pair owes its stabilization to the resonance energy provided by the mixing of the local ionic configurations, [(3)M(↑↑)(-)]M(+) and M(+)[(3)M(↑↑)(-)], and the various excited covalent configurations (involving pz and dz(2) atomic orbitals) into the repulsive covalent structure (3)(M↑↑M) with the s(1)s(1) electronic configuration. The NPFM bond of the bound triplet is described by a resonating wave function with "in-out" and "out-in" pointing hybrids. The VB model accounts for the tendency of NPFM clusters to assume polyhedral shapes with rather high symmetry. In addition, this model explains the very steep rise of the bonding energy per atom (De/n), which starts out small in the (3)M2 dimer (<1 kcal/mol) and reaches 12-19 kcal/mol for clusters with 10 atoms. The model further predicts that usage of heteroatomic clusters should increase the bonding energy of an NPFM cluster. These NPFM clusters are excited state species. We suggest here stabilizing these states and making them accessible, for example, by using magnetic fields, or a combination of magnetic and electric fields. The advent of NPFM clusters offers new horizons in chemistry and enriches the scope of chemical bonding. These prospects form a strong incentive to investigate the origins of the bound triplet pairs and further chart the territory of NPFM clusters, for example, in clusters of Be, Mg, or Zn, possibly in clusters of their monosubstituted species, and the group III metalloids, such as B, Al, as well as in transition metals such as Sc.

The Lewis legacy: the chemical bond--a territory and heartland of chemistry

Is chemistry a science without a territory? I argue that "chemical bonding" has been a traditional chemical territory ever since the chemical community amalgamated in the seventeenth century, and even before. The modern charter of this territory is Gilbert Newton Lewis, who started the "electronic structure revolution in chemistry." As a tribute to Lewis, I describe here three of his key papers from the years 1913, 1916, and 1923, and analyze them. Lewis has defined the quantum unit, the "electron pair bond," for construction of a chemical universe, and in so doing he charted a vast chemical territory and affected most profoundly the mental map of chemistry for generations ahead. Nevertheless, not all is known about the chemical bond" the chemical territory is still teaming with new and exciting problems of in new materials, nanoparticles, quantum dots, metalloenzymes, bonding at surface-vapor interfaces, and so on and so forth.

Quantum Effects on the Caloric Curves of Lithium Clusters

A tight-binding quantum Hamiltonian and an empirical embedded-atom model (EAM) potential are used to get insight into the finite-temperature behavior of small Lin clusters, n = 8, 20, and 55. Exchange Monte Carlo simulations provide an extensive sampling of configuration space, including the putative global minimum and many relevant isomers. The heat capacities obtained from the classical simulations are corrected for low-temperature quantum delocalization using the Pitzer-Gwinn approximation. Alternatively, the caloric curves are estimated from the database of local minima using the quantum harmonic superposition approximation. While the two atomistic models predict qualitatively similar features, including some premelting effects in Li20 but none in Li55, strong variations are observed in the melting temperatures, the EAM potential giving unexpectedly low values.

Structural and electronic properties of boron-doped lithium clusters: Ab initio and DFT studies

The lowest-energy structures and electronic properties of the BLi(n) (n = 1-7) clusters are reported using the B3LYP, MP2, and CCSD(T) methods with the aug-cc-pVDZ basis set. Though the results at the B3LYP level agree well with those at the CCSD(T) level, the MP2 method is rather unsatisfactory. The first three-dimensional ground state in the BLi(n) clusters occurs for BLi(4), and the impurity B atom is seen to be trapped in a Li cage from the BLi(6) cluster onwards. The evolution of the binding energies, vertical ionization potentials, and polarizability with size of cluster shows the BLi(5) cluster to be most stable among the BLi(n) clusters. Besides, the BLi(5) cluster is also found to have the largest reaction enthalpy (49.8 kcal/mol) upon losing a Li atom, which is different from the previous prediction. The unique stability of the 8-valence electron BLi(5) can be understood from the cluster electronic shell model (CSM). However, in contradiction to the prediction of the CSM, the 2s level is filled prior to the 1d level in the BLi(n) clusters.

Ferromagnetic Bonding: High Spin Copper Clusters (n+1Cun; n = 2−14) Devoid of Electron Pairs but Possessing Strong Bonding

Density functional theoretic studies are performed for the high-spin copper clusters (n)(+1)Cu(n) (n = 2-14), which are devoid of electron pairs shared between atoms, hence no-pair clusters (J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 1352; Isr. J. Chem. 1993, 33, 455; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3165). Despite the lack of electron pairing, it is found that the bond dissociation energy per atom (BDE/n) is significant and converges (to within 1 kcal mol(-1)), around a cluster size (11)Cu(10), to a value of BDE/n = 19 kcal mol(-1). This is a very large bonding energy, much larger than has previously been obtained for no-pair clusters of lithium, BDE/n = 12 kcal mol(-1), or sodium clusters, BDE/n = 3 kcal mol(-1). This bonding, so-called ferromagnetic bonding (FM-bonding) is analyzed using a valence bond (VB) model (J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 4961; Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 158). As such, FM-bonding in no-pair clusters is described as an ionic fluctuation, of the triplet pair, that spreads over all the close neighbors of a given atom in the clusters. Thus, if we refer to each triplet pair and its ionic fluctuations as a local FM-bond, we can regard the electronic structure of a given (n)(+1)M(n) cluster as a resonance hybrid of all the local FM-bonds between close neighbors. The model shows how a weak interaction in the diatomic triplet molecule can become a remarkably strong binding force that binds together mono-valent atoms without even a single electron pair. This is achieved because the growing number of VB structures exerts a cumulative effect of stabilization that is maximized when the cluster has a compact structure with an optimal coordination number for the atoms.

A survey of recent developments in ab initio valence bond theory

Starting from the 1980s and onwards, Valence Bond theory has been enjoying renaissance that is characterized by the development of a growing number of ab initio methods, and by many applications to chemical reactivity and to the central paradigms of chemistry. Owing the increase of computational power of modern computers and to significant advances in the methodology, valence bond theory begins to offer a sound and attractive alternative to Molecular Orbital theory. This review aims at summarizing the most important developments of ab initio valence bond methods during the last two or three decades, and is primarily devoted to a description of what the various methods can actually achieve within their specific scopes and limitations. Key available softwares are surveyed.