Amino Acid Protonation States Determine Binding Sites of the Secondary Ubiquinone and Its Anion in the Rhodobacter sphaeroides Photosynthetic Reaction Center

Mechanism of the formation of proton transfer pathways in photosynthetic reaction centers

The crystal structures of photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRCs) and photosystem II show large structural similarity. However, the proposed mechanisms of proton transfer toward the terminal electron acceptor quinone (Q_B) are not consistent. In particular, not His-L190, which is an H-bond partner of Q_B, but rather Glu-L212, which is ∼6 Å away from Q_B, was assumed to be the direct proton donor for Q_B. We demonstrate that the H-bond between His-L190 and Q_B is a low-barrier H-bond, which facilitates proton transfer from singly protonated His-L190 to Q_B. Furthermore, Glu-L212 is not a direct H-bond donor for Q_B. However, it facilitates proton transfer toward deprotonated His-L190 via water molecules after Q_BH₂ forms and leaves the PbRC.

In photosynthetic reaction centers from purple bacteria (PbRCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the secondary quinone Q_B accepts two electrons and two protons via electron-coupled proton transfer (PT). Here, we identify PT pathways that proceed toward the Q_B binding site, using a quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical approach. As the first electron is transferred to Q_B, the formation of the Grotthuss-like pre-PT H-bond network is observed along Asp-L213, Ser-L223, and the distal Q_B carbonyl O site. As the second electron is transferred, the formation of a low-barrier H-bond is observed between His-L190 at Fe and the proximal Q_B carbonyl O site, which facilitates the second PT. As Q_BH₂ leaves PbRC, a chain of water molecules connects protonated Glu-L212 and deprotonated His-L190 forms, which serves as a pathway for the His-L190 reprotonation. The findings of the second pathway, which does not involve Glu-L212, and the third pathway, which proceeds from Glu-L212 to His-L190, provide a mechanism for PT commonly used among PbRCs.

Relaxation processes accompanying electron stabilization in the quinone acceptor part of Rb. sphaeroides reaction centers

The temperature dependence of the dark recombination rate in photooxidized bacteriochlorophyll (P) and photoreduced quinone acceptors (ubiquinones) Q_A and Q_B of photosynthetic reaction centers of purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides (Rb. sphaeroides) was studied. Photoinduced changes in the absorption were detected in the Q_x absorption band of photooxidized bacteriochlorophyll at 600 nm and in the bands corresponding to the redox changes of ubiquinones at 335 and 420-450 nm. Kinetic analysis was used to evaluate the activation energy and the characteristic time of the transient process of relaxation accompanying electron stabilization at the final quinone acceptor. A comparative study of the kinetics of oxidation-reduction reactions of photoactive bacteriochlorophyll RC purple bacteria and quinone acceptors in their individual absorption bands is an informative approach to studying the mechanisms of this stabilization. The analysis of the revealed kinetic differences makes it possible to estimate the activation energy and the characteristic times of the transition relaxation processes associated with the stabilization of the electron in the quinone acceptor part of RC. Purple bacterial reaction centers have fundamental similarities with PSII reaction centers. Such a similarity represents evolutional closeness between the two types of RC. So it is possible that the photoinduced charge separation in PSII RC, as well as in purple bacteria RC, is also accompanied by definite conformational changes. The possible role of hydrogen bonds of surrounding protein in the relaxation processes accompanying the electron transfer to quinone acceptors is discussed.

The Unusually Strong Hydrogen Bond between the Carbonyl of QAand His M219 in theRhodobacter sphaeroidesReaction Center Is Not Essential for Efficient Electron Transfer from QA-to QB

In native reaction centers (RCs) from photosynthetic purple bacteria the primary quinone (QA) and the secondary quinone (QB) are interconnected via a specific His-Fe-His bridge. In Rhodobacter sphaeroides RCs the C4=O carbonyl of QA forms a very strong hydrogen bond with the protonated Npi of His M219, and the Ntau of this residue is in turn coordinated to the non-heme iron atom. The second carbonyl of QA is engaged in a much weaker hydrogen bond with the backbone N-H of Ala M260. In previous work, a Trp side chain was introduced by site-directed mutagenesis at the M260 position in the RC of Rb. sphaeroides, resulting in a complex that is completely devoid of QA and therefore nonfunctional. A photochemically competent derivative of the AM260W mutant was isolated that contains a Cys side chain at the M260 position (denoted AM260(W-->C)). In the present work, the interactions between the carbonyl groups of QA and the protein in the AM260(W-->C) suppressor mutant have been characterized by light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy of the photoreduction of QA. The QA-/QA difference spectrum demonstrates that the strong interaction between the C4=O carbonyl of QA and His M219 is lost in the mutant, and the coupled CO and CC modes of the QA- semiquinone are also strongly perturbed. In parallel, a band assigned to the perturbation of the C5-Ntau mode of His M219 upon QA- formation in the native RC is lacking in the spectrum of the mutant. Furthermore, a positive band between 2900 and 2400 cm-1 that is related to protons fluctuating within a network of highly polarizable hydrogen bonds in the native RC is reduced in amplitude in the mutant. On the other hand, the QB-/QB FTIR difference spectrum is essentially the same as for the native RC. The kinetics of electron transfer from QA- to QB were measured by the flash-induced absorption changes at 780 nm. Compared to native RCs the absorption transients are slowed by a factor of about 2 for both the slow phase (in the hundreds of microseconds range) and fast phase (microseconds to tens of microseconds range) in AM260(W-->C) RCs. We conclude that the unusually strong hydrogen bond between the carbonyl of QA and His M219 in the Rb. sphaeroides RC is not obligatory for efficient electron transfer from QA- to QB.

pH modulates the quinone position in the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides in the neutral and charge separated states

The structure of the photosynthetic reaction-center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been determined at four different pH values (6.5, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0) in the neutral and in charge separated states. At pH 8.0, in the neutral state, we obtain a resolution of 1.87 A, which is the best ever reported for the bacterial reaction center protein. Our crystallographic data confirm the existence of two different binding positions of the secondary quinone (QB). We observe a new orientation of QB in its distal position, which shows no ring-flip compared to the orientation in the proximal position. Datasets collected for the different pH values show a pH-dependence of the population of the proximal position. The new orientation of QB in the distal position and the pH-dependence could be confirmed by continuum electrostatics calculations. Our calculations are in agreement with the experimentally observed proton uptake upon charge separation. The high resolution of our crystallographic data allows us to identify new water molecules and external residues being involved in two previously described hydrogen bond proton channels. These extended proton-transfer pathways, ending at either of the two oxo-groups of QB in its proximal position, provide additional evidence that ring-flipping is not required for complete protonation of QB upon reduction.

Monitoring the pH Dependence of IR Carboxylic Acid Signals upon QB- Formation in the Glu-L212 → Asp/Asp-L213 → Glu Swap Mutant Reaction Center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from the purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions occur at the secondary quinone (QB) site. Involved in the proton uptake steps are carboxylic acids, which have characteristic infrared vibrations in the 1770-1700 cm-1 spectral range that are sensitive to 1H/2H isotopic exchange. With respect to the native RC, a novel protonation pattern for carboxylic acids upon QB photoreduction has been identified in the Glu-L212 --> Asp/Asp-L213 --> Glu mutant RC using light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy (Nabedryk, E., Breton, J., Okamura, M. Y., and Paddock, M. L. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 7236-7243). These carboxylic acids are structurally close and have been implicated in proton transfer to reduced QB. In this work, we extend previous studies by measuring the pH dependence of the QB-/QB FTIR difference spectra of the mutant in 1H2O and 2H2O. Large pH dependent changes were observed in the 1770-1700 cm-1 spectral range between pH 8 and pH 4. The IR fingerprints of the protonating carboxylic acids upon QB- formation were obtained from the calculated double-difference spectra 1H2O minus 2H2O. These IR fingerprints are specific for each pH, indicative of the contribution of different titrating groups. In particular, the 1752 cm-1 signal indicates that Glu-L213 protonates upon QB- formation at pH >or= 5, whereas the 1746 cm-1 signal indicates protonation of Asp-L212 even at pH 4. An unidentified carboxylic acid absorbing at approximately 1765 cm-1 could be the proton donor between pH 8 and 5. The observation that in the swap mutant there are several uniquely behaving carboxylic acids shows that electrostatic interactions occurring between them are sufficiently modified from the native RC to reveal their IR signatures.

Trapped conformational states of semiquinone (D+*QB-*) formed by B-branch electron transfer at low temperature in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides captures light energy by electron transfer between quinones QA and QB, involving a conformational gating step. In this work, conformational states of D+*QB-* were trapped (80 K) and studied using EPR spectroscopy in native and mutant RCs that lack QA in which QB was reduced by the bacteriopheophytin along the B-branch. In mutant RCs frozen in the dark, a light induced EPR signal due to D+*QB-* formed in 30% of the sample with low quantum yield (0.2%-20%) and decayed in 6 s. A small signal with similar characteristics was also observed in native RCs. In contrast, the EPR signal due to D+*QB-* in mutant RCs illuminated while freezing formed in approximately 95% of the sample did not decay (tau >107 s) at 80 K (also observed in the native RC). In all samples, the observed g-values were the same (g = 2.0026), indicating that all active QB-*'s were located in a proximal conformation coupled with the nonheme Fe2+. We propose that before electron transfer at 80 K, the majority (approximately 70%) of QB, structurally located in the distal site, was not stably reducible, whereas the minority (approximately 30%) of active configurations was in the proximal site. The large difference in the lifetimes of the unrelaxed and relaxed D+*QB-* states is attributed to the relaxation of protein residues and internal water molecules that stabilize D+*QB-*. These results demonstrate energetically significant conformational changes involved in stabilizing the D+*QB-* state. The unrelaxed and relaxed states can be considered to be the initial and final states along the reaction coordinate for conformationally gated electron transfer.

Photoactivation of the photosynthetic reaction center of Blastochloris viridis in the crystalline state

Photoactivation in crystals of the bacterial reaction center of Blastochloris viridis was investigated by near-infrared spectroscopy. The bleaching of the special pair absorption at 970 nm and the simultaneous rise of the special pair cation absorption at 1300 nm were measured in response to transient irradiation by a HeNe laser over 5 orders of magnitude in laser power. The resulting power-saturation curve can be used to estimate the true extent of photoactivation achieved in a prior time-resolved crystallographic experiment (Baxter et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 5982-5987). The overall extent of photoactivation was 50%, which demonstrates that the time-resolved crystallographic method can be applied to the optically dense reaction center crystals. Measurement of the charge-recombination rate, however, suggests the presence of a long-lived P+ state within the crystal.

Factors influencing the energetics of electron and proton transfers in proteins. What can be learned from calculations

A protein structure should provide the information needed to understand its observed properties. Significant progress has been made in developing accurate calculations of acid/base and oxidation/reduction reactions in proteins. Current methods and their strengths and weaknesses are discussed. The distribution and calculated ionization states in a survey of proteins is described, showing that a significant minority of acidic and basic residues are buried in the protein and that most of these remain ionized. The electrochemistry of heme and quinones are considered. Proton transfers in bacteriorhodopsin and coupled electron and proton transfers in photosynthetic reaction centers, 5-coordinate heme binding proteins and cytochrome c oxidase are highlighted as systems where calculations have provided insight into the reaction mechanism.

Ubiquinol oxidation in the cytochrome bc1 complex: Reaction mechanism and prevention of short-circuiting

This review is focused on the mechanism of ubiquinol oxidation by the cytochrome bc1 complex (bc1). This integral membrane complex serves as a "hub" in the vast majority of electron transfer chains. The bc1 oxidizes a ubiquinol molecule to ubiquinone by a unique "bifurcated" reaction where the two released electrons go to different acceptors: one is accepted by the mobile redox active domain of the [2Fe-2S] iron-sulfur Rieske protein (FeS protein) and the other goes to cytochrome b. The nature of intermediates in this reaction remains unclear. It is also debatable how the enzyme prevents short-circuiting that could happen if both electrons escape to the FeS protein. Here, I consider a reaction mechanism that (i) agrees with the available experimental data, (ii) entails three traits preventing the short-circuiting in bc1, and (iii) exploits the evident structural similarity of the ubiquinone binding sites in the bc1 and the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (RC). Based on the latter congruence, it is suggested that the reaction route of ubiquinol oxidation by bc1 is a reversal of that leading to the ubiquinol formation in the RC. The rate-limiting step of ubiquinol oxidation is then the re-location of a ubiquinol molecule from its stand-by site within cytochrome b into a catalytic site, which is formed only transiently, after docking of the mobile redox domain of the FeS protein to cytochrome b. In the catalytic site, the quinone ring is stabilized by Glu-272 of cytochrome b and His-161 of the FeS protein. The short circuiting is prevented as long as: (i) the formed semiquinone anion remains bound to the reduced FeS domain and impedes its undocking, so that the second electron is forced to go to cytochrome b; (ii) even after ubiquinol is fully oxidized, the reduced FeS domain remains docked to cytochrome b until electron(s) pass through cytochrome b; (iii) if cytochrome b becomes (over)reduced, the binding and oxidation of further ubiquinol molecules is hampered; the reason is that the Glu-272 residue is turned towards the reduced hemes of cytochrome b and is protonated to stabilize the surplus negative charge; in this state, this residue cannot participate in the binding/stabilization of a ubiquinol molecule.

Internal dynamics and protein–matrix coupling in trehalose-coated proteins

We review recent studies on the role played by non-liquid, water-containing matrices on the dynamics and structure of embedded proteins. Two proteins were studied, in water-trehalose matrices: a water-soluble protein (carboxy derivative of horse heart myoglobin) and a membrane protein (reaction centre from Rhodobacter sphaeroides). Several experimental techniques were used: Mossbauer spectroscopy, elastic neutron scattering, FTIR spectroscopy, CO recombination after flash photolysis in carboxy-myoglobin, kinetic optical absorption spectroscopy following pulsed and continuous photoexcitation in Q(B) containing or Q(B) deprived reaction centre from R. sphaeroides. Experimental results, together with the outcome of molecular dynamics simulations, concurred to give a picture of how water-containing matrices control the internal dynamics of the embedded proteins. This occurs, in particular, via the formation of hydrogen bond networks that anchor the protein surface to the surrounding matrix, whose stiffness increases by lowering the sample water content. In the conclusion section, we also briefly speculate on how the protein-matrix interactions observed in our samples may shed light on the protein-solvent coupling also in liquid aqueous solutions.

Quinone (QB) Reduction by B-Branch Electron Transfer in Mutant Bacterial Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Quantum Efficiency and X-ray Structure,

The photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from purple bacteria converts light into chemical energy. Although the RC shows two nearly structurally symmetric branches, A and B, light-induced electron transfer in the native RC occurs almost exclusively along the A-branch to a primary quinone electron acceptor Q(A). Subsequent electron and proton transfer to a mobile quinone molecule Q(B) converts it to a quinol, Q(B)H(2). We report the construction and characterization of a series of mutants in Rhodobacter sphaeroides designed to reduce Q(B) via the B-branch. The quantum efficiency to Q(B) via the B-branch Phi(B) ranged from 0.4% in an RC containing the single mutation Ala-M260 --> Trp to 5% in a quintuple mutant which includes in addition three mutations to inhibit transfer along the A-branch (Gly-M203 --> Asp, Tyr-M210 --> Phe, Leu-M214 --> His) and one to promote transfer along the B-branch (Phe-L181 --> Tyr). Comparing the value of 0.4% for Phi(B) obtained in the AW(M260) mutant, which lacks Q(A), to the 100% quantum efficiency for Phi(A) along the A-branch in the native RC, we obtain a ratio for A-branch to B-branch electron transfer of 250:1. We determined the structure of the most effective (quintuple) mutant RC at 2.25 A (R-factor = 19.6%). The Q(A) site did not contain a quinone but was occupied by the side chain of Trp-M260 and a Cl(-). In this structure a nonfunctional quinone was found to occupy a new site near M258 and M268. The implications of this work to trap intermediate states are discussed.

Energetics of Proton Transfer Pathways in Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Electron transfer between the primary and secondary quinones (Q(A), Q(B)) in the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) is coupled with proton uptake at Q(B). The protons are conducted from the cytoplasmic side, probably with the participation of two water channels. Mutations of titratable residues like Asp-L213 to Asn (inhibited mutant) or the double mutant Glu-L212 to Ala/Asp-L213 to Ala inhibit these electron transfer-coupled proton uptake events. The inhibition of the proton transfer (PT) process in the single mutant can be restored by a second mutation of Arg-M233 to Cys or Arg-H177 to His (revertant mutant). These revertant mutants shed light on the location of the main proton transfer pathway of wild type bRC. In contrast to the wild type and inhibited mutant bRC, the revertant mutant bRC showed notable proton uptake at Glu-H173 upon formation of the Q(B)- state. In all of these mutants, the pK(a) of Asp-M17 decreased by 1.4-2.4 units with respect to the wild type bRC, whereas a significant pK(a) upshift of up to 5.8 units was observed at Glu-H122, Asp-H170, Glu-H173, and Glu-H230 in the revertant mutants. These residues belonging to the main PT pathway are arranged along water channel P1 localized mainly in subunit H. bRC possesses subunit H, which has no counterpart in photosystem II. Thus, bRC may possess alternative PT pathways involving water channels in subunit H, which becomes active in case the main PT pathway is blocked.

Energetics of Quinone-Dependent Electron and Proton Transfers in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Photosynthetic Reaction Centers

Proteins bind redox cofactors, modifying their electrochemistry and affinity by specific interactions of the binding site with each cofactor redox state. Photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides have three ubiquinone-binding sites, Q(A), and proximal and distal Q(B) sites. Ubiquinones, which can be doubly reduced and bind 2 protons, have 9 redox states. However, only Q and Q(-) are seen in the Q(A) site and Q, Q(-), and QH(2) in the proximal Q(B) site. The distal Q(B) function is uncertain. Multiple conformation continuum electrostatics (MCCE) was used to compare the ubiquinone electrochemical midpoints (E(m)) and pK(a) values at these three sites. At pH 7, the Q(A)/Q(A)(-) E(m) is -40 mV and proximal Q(B)/Q(B)(-) -10 mV in agreement with the experimental values (assuming a solution ubiquinone E(m) of -145 mV). Q(B) reduction requires changes in nearby residue protonation and SerL223 reorientation. The distal Q(B)/Q(B)(-) E(m) is a much more unfavorable -260 mV. Q(A) and proximal Q(B) sites generally stabilize species with a -1 charge, while the distal Q(B) site prefers binding neutral species. In each site, the dianion is destabilized because favorable interactions with the residues and backbone increase with charge (q), while the unfavorable loss of solvation energy increases with q(2). Therefore, proton binding before a second reduction, forming QH and then QH(-), is always preferred to forming the dianion (Q(-)(2)). The final product QH(2) is higher in energy at the proximal Q(B) site than in solution; therefore, it binds poorly, favoring release. In contrast, QH(2) binds more tightly than Q at the distal Q(B) site.

Variation of Ser-L223 Hydrogen Bonding with the QB Redox State in Reaction Centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Ser-L223 is close to ubiquinone (Q(B)) in the B-branch of the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center (bRC) from Rhodobacter (Rb) sphaeroides. Therefore, the presence of a hydrogen bond (H bond) between the two was naturally proposed from the crystal structure. The hydrogen bonding pattern of Q(B) from the light-exposed structure was studied by generating hydrogen atom coordinates based on the CHARMM force field. In the Q(B) neutral charge state (Q(B)(0)), no H bond was found between the oxygen of the OH group from Ser-L223 and the carbonyl oxygen of Q(B) that is distal to the non-heme iron. In the reduced state (Q(B)(-)), however, Ser-L213 was found to form an H bond with Q(B) only when Asp-L213 is protonated by more than 0.75 H(+). This indicates the significance of the protonation of Asp-L213 in forming an H bond between Ser-L223 and Q(B). We found that the driving force to form the H bond between Ser-L223 and Q(B) is enhanced by the positively charged Arg-L217. The calculated Q(B) redox potentials with or without this H bond discriminated two ET rates, which are close to the faster and slower time phases observed in UV-Vis and FTIR studies. Together with the calculated redox potential of the quinones, this H-bond formation could play a key role in conformational gating for the ET process from Q(A) to Q(B).

Characterization of the bonding interactions of QB upon photoreduction via A-branch or B-branch electron transfer in mutant reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RCs) containing the mutation Ala M260 to Trp (AM260W), transmembrane electron transfer along the full-length of the A-branch of cofactors is prevented by the loss of the Q(A) ubiquinone, but it is possible to generate the radical pair P(+)H(A)(-) by A-branch electron transfer or the radical pair P(+)Q(B)(-) by B-branch electron transfer. In the present study, FTIR spectroscopy was used to provide direct evidence for the complete absence of the Q(A) ubiquinone in mutant RCs with the AM260W mutation. Light-induced FTIR difference spectroscopy of isolated RCs was also used to probe the neutral Q(B) and the semiquinone Q(B)(-) states in two B-branch active mutants, a double AM260W-LM214H mutant, denoted WH, and a quadruple mutant, denoted WAAH, in which the AM260W, LM214H, and EL212A-DL213A mutations were combined. The data were compared to those obtained with wild-type (Wt) RCs and the double EL212A-DL213A (denoted AA) mutant which exhibit the usual A-branch electron transfer to Q(B). The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectrum of the WH mutant is very close to that of Wt RCs indicating similar bonding interactions of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein in both RCs. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of the AA and WAAH mutants are also closely related to one another, but are very different to that of the Wt complex. Isotope-edited IR fingerprint spectra were obtained for the AA and WAAH mutants reconstituted with site-specific (13)C-labeled ubiquinone. Whilst perturbations of the interactions of the semiquinone Q(B)(-) with the protein are observed in the AA and WAAH mutants, the FTIR data show that the bonding interaction of neutral Q(B) in these two mutants are essentially the same as those for Wt RCs. Therefore, it is concluded that Q(B) occupies the same binding position proximal to the non-heme iron prior to reduction by either A-branch or B-branch electron transfer.

Identification of a Novel Protonation Pattern for Carboxylic Acids upon QB Photoreduction in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Reaction Center Mutants at Asp-L213 and Glu-L212 Sites

In the reaction center from the photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, light energy is rapidly converted to chemical energy through coupled electron-proton transfer to a buried quinone molecule Q(B). Involved in the proton uptake steps are carboxylic acids, which have characteristic infrared vibrations that are observable using light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy. Upon formation, Q(B)(-) induces protonation of Glu-L212, located within 5 A of Q(B), resulting in a IR signal at 1728 cm(-1). However, no other IR signal is observed within the classic absorption range of protonated carboxylic acids (1770-1700 cm(-1)). In particular, no signal for Asp-L213 is found despite its juxtaposition to Q(B) and importance for proton uptake on the second electron-transfer step. In an attempt to uncover the reason behind this lack of signal, the microscopic electrostatic environment in the vicinity of Q(B) was modified by interchanging Asp and Glu at the L213 and L212 positions. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR spectrum of the Asp-L212/Glu-L213 swap mutant in the 1770-1700 cm(-1) range shows several distinct new signals, which are sensitive to (1)H/(2)H isotopic exchange, indicating that the reduction of Q(B) results in the change of the protonation state of several carboxylic acids. The new bands at 1752 and 1747 cm(-1) were assigned to an increase of protonation in response to Q(B) reduction of Glu-L213 and Asp-L212, respectively, based on the effect of replacing them with their amine analogues. Since other carboxylic acid signals were observed, it is concluded that the swap mutations at L212 and L213 affect a cluster of carboxylic acids larger than the L212/L213 acid pair. Implications for the native reaction center are discussed.

Absence of Large-Scale Displacement of Quinone QB in Bacterial Photosynthetic Reaction Centers

Photosynthesis transforms light into chemical energy by coupling electron transfer to proton uptake at the quinone Q(B). The possibility of initiating this process with a brief pulse of light and the known X-ray structure makes the photosynthetic bacterial reaction center a paradigm for studying coupled electron-proton transfer in biology. It has been established that electron transfer from the primary quinone Q(A) to Q(B) is gated by a protein conformational change. On the basis of a dramatic difference in the location of Q(B) in structures derived from crystals cooled to 90 K either under illumination or in the dark, a functional model for the gating mechanism was proposed whereby neutral Q(B) moves 4.5 A before receiving the electron from Q(A)(-) [Stowell, M. H. B., McPhillips, T. M., Rees, D. C., Soltis, S. M., Abresch, E., and Feher, G. (1997) Science 276, 812-816]. Isotope-edited FTIR difference spectroscopy of Q(B) photoreduction at 290 and 85 K is used to investigate whether Q(B) moves upon reduction. We show that the specific interactions of the carbonyl groups of Q(B) and Q(B)(-) with the protein at a single binding site remain identical at both temperatures. Therefore, the different locations of Q(B) reported in many X-ray crystal structures probably are unrelated to functional electron transfer from Q(A)(-) to Q(B).

Redox potential of quinones in both electron transfer branches of photosystem I

The redox potentials of the two electron transfer (ET) active quinones in the central part of photosystem I (PSI) were determined by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation based on the crystal structure. The calculated redox potentials are -531 mV for A1A and -686 mV for A1B. From these results we conclude the following. (i) Both branches are active with a much faster ET in the B-branch than in the A-branch. (ii) The measured lifetime of 200-290 ns of reduced quinones agrees with the estimate for the A-branch and corroborates with an uphill ET from this quinone to the iron-sulfur cluster as observed in recent kinetic measurements. (iii) The electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopic data refer to the A-branch quinone where the corresponding ET is uphill in energy. The negative redox potential of A1 in PSI is primarily because of the influence from the negatively charged FX, in contrast to the positive shift on the quinone redox potential in bacterial reaction center and PSII that is attributed to the positively charged non-heme iron atom. The conserved residue Asp-B575 changes its protonation state after quinone reduction. The difference of 155 mV in the quinone redox potentials of the two branches were attributed to the conformation of the backbone with a large contribution from Ser-A692 and Ser-B672 and to the side chain of Asp-B575, whose protonation state couples differently with the formation of the quinone radicals.

Quinone (Q(B)) binding site and protein stuctural changes in photosynthetic reaction center mutants at Pro-L209 revealed by vibrational spectroscopy

The effect of substituting Pro-L209 with Tyr, Phe, Glu, and Thr in photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was investigated by monitoring the light-induced FTIR absorption changes associated with the photoreduction of the secondary quinone Q(B). Pro-L209 is close to a chain of ordered water molecules connecting Q(B) to the bulk phase. In wild-type RCs, two distinct main Q(B) binding sites (distal and proximal to the non-heme iron) have been described in the literature. The X-ray structures of the mutant RCs Pro-L209 --> Tyr, Pro-L209 --> Phe, and Pro-L209 --> Glu have revealed that Q(B) occupies a proximal, intermediate, and distal position, respectively [Kuglstatter, A., Ermler, U., Michel, H., Baciou, L., and Fritzsch, G. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4253-4260]. FTIR absorption changes associated with the reduction of Q(B) in Pro-L209 --> Phe RCs reconstituted with (13)C-labeled ubiquinone show a highly specific IR fingerprint for the C=O and C=C modes of Q(B) upon selective labeling at C(1) or C(4). This IR fingerprint is similar to those of wild-type RCs and the Pro-L209 --> Tyr mutant [Breton, J., Boullais, C., Mioskowski, C., Sebban, P., Baciou, L., and Nabedryk, E. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 12921-12927], demonstrating that equivalent interactions occur between neutral Q(B) and the protein in wild-type and mutant RCs. It is concluded that in all RCs, neutral Q(B) in its functional state occupies a unique binding site which is favored to be the proximal site. This result contrasts with the multiple Q(B) binding sites found in crystal structures. With respect to wild-type RCs, the largest FTIR spectral changes upon Q(B)(-) formation are observed for the Phe-L209 and Tyr-L209 mutants which undergo similar protein structural changes and perturbations of the semiquinone modes. Smaller changes are observed for the Glu-L209 mutant, while the vibrational properties of the Thr-L209 mutant are essentially the same as those for native RCs.

Redox potential of quinones in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides: dependence on protonation of Glu-L212 and Asp-L213

The absolute values of the one-electron redox potentials of the two quinones (Q(A) and Q(B)) in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were calculated by evaluating the electrostatic energies from the solution of the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann equation at pH 7.0. The redox potential for Q(A) was calculated to be between -173 and -160 mV, which is close to the lowest measured values that are assumed to refer to nonequilibrated protonation patterns in the redox state Q(A)(-). The redox potential of quinone Q(B) is found to be about 160-220 mV larger for the light-exposed than for the dark-adapted structure. These values of the redox potentials are obtained if Asp-L213 is nearly protonated (probability 0.75-1.0) before and after electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), while Glu-L212 is partially protonated (probability 0.6) in the initial state Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) and fully protonated in the final state Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-). Conversely, if the charge state of the quinones is varied from Q(A)(-)Q(B)(0) to Q(A)(0)Q(B)(-) corresponding to the electron transfer from Q(A) to Q(B), Asp-L213 remains protonated, while Glu-L212 changes its protonation state from 0.15 H(+) to fully protonated. In agreement with results from FTIR spectra, there is proton uptake at Glu-L212 going along with the electron transfer, whereas Asp-L213 does not change its protonation state. However, in our simulations Asp-L213 is considered to be protonated rather than ionized as deduced from FTIR spectra. The calculated redox potential of Q(A) shows little dependence on the charge state of Asp-L213, which is due to a strong coupling with the protonation state of Asp-M17 but increases by 50 mV if Glu-L212 changes from the ionized to the protonated charge state. Both are in agreement with fluorescence measurements observing the decay of SP(+)Q(A)(-) in a wide pH regime. The computed difference in redox potential of Q(B) in the light-exposed and dark-adapted structure was traced back to the hydrogen bond of Q(B) with His-L190 that is lost in the dark-adapted structure and the charge of the non-heme iron atom, which is closer to Q(B) in the light-exposed than in the dark-adapted structure.

The position of QB in the photosynthetic reaction center depends on pH: a theoretical analysis of the proton uptake upon QB reduction

Electrostatics-based calculations have been performed to examine the proton uptake upon reduction of the terminal electron acceptor Q(B) in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides as a function of pH and the associated conformational equilibrium. Two crystal structures of the reaction center were considered: one structure was determined in the dark and the other under illumination. In the two structures, the Q(B) was found in two different positions, proximal or distal to the nonheme iron. Because Q(B) was found mainly in the distal position in the dark and only in the proximal position under illumination, the two positions have been attributed mostly to the oxidized and the reduced forms of Q(B), respectively. We calculated the proton uptake upon Q(B) reduction by four different models. In the first model, Q(B) is allowed to equilibrate between the two positions with either oxidation state. This equilibrium was allowed to vary with pH. In the other three models the distribution of Q(B) between the proximal position and the distal position was pH-independent, with Q(B) occupying only the distal position or only the proximal position or populating the two positions with a fixed ratio. Only the first model, which includes the pH-dependent conformational equilibrium, reproduces both the experimentally measured pH dependence of the proton uptake and the crystallographically observed conformational equilibrium at pH 8. From this model, we find that Q(B) occupies only the distal position below pH 6.5 and only the proximal position above pH 9.0 in both oxidation states. Between these pH values both positions are partially occupied. The reduced Q(B) has a higher occupancy in the proximal position than the oxidized Q(B). In summary, the present results indicate that the conformational equilibrium of Q(B) depends not only on the redox state of Q(B), but also on the pH value of the solution.

Determination of proton transfer rates by chemical rescue: application to bacterial reaction centers

The bacterial reaction center (RC) converts light into chemical energy through the reduction of an internal quinone molecule Q(B) to Q(B)H(2). In the native RC, proton transfer is coupled to electron transfer and is not rate-controlling. Consequently, proton transfer is not directly observable, and its rate was unknown. In this work, we present a method for making proton transfer rate-controlling, which enabled us to determine its rate. The imidazole groups of the His-H126 and His-H128 proton donors, located at the entrance of the transfer pathways, were removed by site-directed mutagenesis (His --> Ala). This resulted in a reduction in the observed proton-coupled electron transfer rate [(Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B))Glu(-) + H(+) --> (Q(A)Q(B)(-)(*))GluH], which became rate-controlled by proton uptake to Glu-L212 [Adelroth, P., et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 14538-14546]. The proton uptake rate was enhanced (rescued) in a controlled fashion by the addition of imidazole or other amine-containing acids. From the dependence of the observed rate on acid concentration, an apparent second-order rate constant k((2)) for the "rescue" of the rate was determined. k((2)) is a function of the proton transfer rate and the binding of the acid. The dependence of k((2)) on the acid pK(a) (i.e., the proton driving force) was measured over 9 pK(a) units, resulting in a Brönsted plot that was characteristic of general acid catalysis. The results were fitted to a model that includes the binding (facilitated by electrostatic attraction) of the cationic acid to the RC surface, proton transfer to an intermediate proton acceptor group, and subsequent proton transfer to Glu-L212. A proton transfer rate constant of approximately 10(5) s(-)(1) was determined for transfer from the bound imidazole group to Glu-L212 (over a distance of approximately 20 A). The same method was used to determine a proton transfer rate constant of 2 x 10(4) s(-)(1) for transfer to Q(B)(-)(*). The relatively fast proton transfer rates are explained by the presence of an intermediate acceptor group that breaks the process into sequential proton transfer steps over shorter distances. This study illustrates an approach that could be generally applied to obtain information about the individual rates and energies for proton transfer processes, as well as the pK(a)s of transfer components, in a variety of proton translocating systems.

Vibrational spectroscopy favors a unique QB binding site at the proximal position in wild-type reaction centers and in the Pro-L209 --> Tyr mutant from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the various X-ray structures of native reaction centers (RCs) from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides, two distinct main binding sites (distal and proximal) for the secondary quinone Q(B) have been described in the literature. The movement of Q(B) from its distal to proximal position has been proposed to account for the conformational gate limiting the rate of the first electron transfer from the primary quinone Q(A-) to Q(B). Recently, Q(B) was found to bind in the proximal binding site in the dark-adapted crystals of a mutant RC where Pro-L209 was changed to Tyr [Kuglstatter, A., Ermler, U., Michel, H., Baciou, L., and Fritzsch, G. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4253-4260]. To test the structural and functional implications of the distal and proximal sites, a comparison of the FTIR vibrational properties of Q(B) in native RCs and in the Pro-L209 --> Tyr mutant was performed. Light-induced FTIR absorption changes associated with the reduction of Q(B) in Pro-L209 --> Tyr RCs reconstituted with 13C-labeled ubiquinone (Q3) at the 1 or 4 position show a highly specific IR fingerprint for the C=O and C=C modes of Q(B) upon selective labeling at C1 or C4. This IR fingerprint is very similar to that of native RCs, demonstrating that equivalent interactions occur between neutral Q(B) and the protein in native and mutant RCs. Consequently, Q(B) occupies the same binding site in all RCs. Since the FTIR data fit the description of Q(B) bonding interactions in the proximal site, it is therefore concluded that neutral Q(B) also binds to the proximal site in native functional RCs. The implication of these new results for the conformational gate of the first electron transfer to Q(B) is outlined.

Exploring the energy landscape for Q(A)(-) to Q(B) electron transfer in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: effect of substrate position and tail length on the conformational gating step

The ability to initiate reactions with a flash of light and to monitor reactions over a wide temperature range allows detailed analysis of reaction mechanisms in photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) of purple bacteria. In this protein, the electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone (Q(A)(-)) to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) is rate-limited by conformational changes rather than electron tunneling. Q(B) movement from a distal to a proximal site has been proposed to be the rate-limiting change. The importance of quinone motion was examined by shortening the Q(B) tail from 50 to 5 carbons. No change in rate was found from 100 to 300 K. The temperature dependence of the rate was also measured in three L209 proline mutants. Under conditions where Q(B) is in the distal site in wild-type RCs, it is trapped in the proximal site in the Tyr L209 mutant [Kuglstatter, A., et al. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 4253-4260]. The electron transfer slows at low temperature for all three mutants as it does in wild-type protein, indicating that conformational changes still limit the reaction rate. Thus, Q(B) movement is unlikely to be the sole, rate-limiting conformational gating step. The temperature dependence of the reaction in the L209 mutants differs somewhat from wild-type RCs. Entropy-enthalpy compensation reduces the difference in rates and free energy changes at room temperature.

Key role of proline L209 in connecting the distant quinone pockets in the reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers convert light excitation into chemical free energy. The initial electron transfer leads to the consecutive semireductions of the primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) quinone acceptors. The Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-) formations induce proton uptake from the bulk. Their magnitudes (H(+)/Q(A)(-) and H(+)/Q(B)(-), respectively) probe the electrostatic interactions within the complex. The pH dependence of H(+)/Q(A)(-) and H(+)/Q(B)(-) were studied in five single mutants modified at the L209 site (L209P-->F,Y,W,E,T). This residue is situated at the border of a continuous chain of water molecules connecting Q(B) to the bulk. In the wild type (WT), a proton uptake band is present at high pH in the H(+)/Q(A)(-) and H(+)/Q(B)(-) curves and is commonly attributed to a cluster of acidic groups situated nearby Q(B). In the H(+)/Q(A)(-) curves of the L209 variants, this band is systematically absent but remains in the H(+)/Q(B)(-) curves. Moreover, notable increase of H(+)/Q(B)(-) is observed in the L209 mutants at neutral pH as compared with the WT. The large effects observed in all L209 mutants are not associated with significant structural changes (Kuglstatter, A., Ermler, U., Michel, H., Baciou, L. & Fritzsch, G. Biochemistry (2001) 40, 4253-4260). Our data suggest that, in the L209 mutants, the Q(B) cluster does not respond to the Q(A)(-) formation as observed in the WT. We propose that, in the mutants, removal of the rigid proline L209 breaks a necessary hydrogen bonding connection between the quinone sites. These findings suggest an important role for structural rigidity in ensuring a functional interaction between quinone binding sites.

Exploring the energy profile of the Q(A)(-) to Q(B) electron transfer reaction in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers: pH dependence of the conformational gating step

Both large- and small-scale conformational changes are needed as proteins carry out reactions. However, little is known about the identity, energy of, and barriers between functional substates on protein reaction coordinates. In isolated bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers, the electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone, Q(A)(-), to the secondary quinone, Q(B), is rate limited by conformational changes at low pH and by proton binding at high pH. The kinetics and thermodynamics of this reaction were determined between 200 and 300 K from pH 6 to pH 10.5. A model with two substates of the reactant, P(+)Q(A)(-)Q(B), one protonated (state A) and one unprotonated (alpha), and one state of the product, P(+)Q(A)Q(B)(-) (B), was able to simulate the dependence of the rate on temperature and pH fairly well. The equilibrium between the three states were measured in situ at each temperature. Proton binding (alpha to A transition) has a favorable DeltaH and unfavorable DeltaS as does the conformational changes required for electron transfer at low pH (A to B). The pK for the A to alpha transition is 9.7 at room temperature, consistent with previous measurements, and equivalent to 13.5 at 200 K. The activation barriers were determined for each transition. Both the alpha to A and the A to B transitions are limited primarily by the activation enthalpy with modest DeltaS.

Proton uptake of rhodobacter capsulatus reaction center mutants modified in the primary quinone environment

Flash-induced absorbance spectroscopy was used to analyze the proton uptake and electron transfer properties of photosynthetic reaction centers (RC) of Rhodobacter capsulatus that have been genetically modified near the primary quinone electron acceptor (Q(A)). M246Ala and M247Ala, which are symmetry-related to the positions of two acidic groups, L212Glu and L213Asp, in the secondary quinone electron acceptor (QB) protein environment, have been mutated to Glu and Asp, respectively. The pH dependence of the stoichiometry of proton uptake upon formation of the P+Q(A)- (H+/P+Q(A)-) and PQ(A) (H+/Q(A)-) (P is the primary electron donor, a noncovalently linked bacteriochlorophyll dimer) states have been measured in the M246Ala --> Glu and the M247Ala --> Asp mutant RC, in the M246Ala-M247Ala --> Glu-Asp double mutant and in the wild type (WT). Our results show that the introduction of an acidic group (Glu or Asp) in the QA protein region induces notable additional proton uptake over a large pH region (approximately 6-9), which reflects a delocalized response of the protein to the formation of Q(A)-. This may indicate the existence of a widely spread proton reservoir in the cytoplasmic region of the protein. Interestingly, the pH titration curves of the proton release caused by the formation of P+ (H+/P+: difference between H+/P+Q(A)- and H+/PQ(A)- curves) are nearly superimposable in the WT and the M246Ala --> Glu mutant RC, but substantial additional proton release is detected between pH 7 and 9 in the M247Ala --> Asp mutant RC. This effect can be accounted for by an increased proton release by the P+ environment in the M247Ala --> Asp mutant. The M247Ala --> Asp mutation reveals the existence of an energetic and conformational coupling between donor and acceptor sides of the RC at a distance of nearly 30A.

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: decrease of proton transfer rate by mutation of surface histidines at H126 and H128 and chemical rescue by imidazole identifies the initial proton donors

The pathway for proton transfer to Q(B) was studied in the reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The binding of Zn(2+) or Cd(2+) to the RC surface at His-H126, His-H128, and Asp-H124 inhibits the rate of proton transfer to Q(B), suggesting that the His may be important for proton transfer [Paddock, M. L., Graige, M. S., Feher, G. and Okamura, M. Y. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6183-6188]. To assess directly the role of the histidines, mutant RCs were constructed in which either one or both His were replaced with Ala. In the single His mutant RCs, no significant effects were observed. In contrast, in the double mutant RC at pH 8.5, the observed rates of proton uptake associated with both the first and the second proton-coupled electron-transfer reactions k(AB)(()(1)()) [Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)-Glu(-) + H(+) --> Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)-GluH --> Q(A)Q(B)(-)(*)-GluH] and k(AB)(()(2)()) [Q(A)(-)(*)Q(B)(-)(*) + H(+) --> Q(A)(-)(*)(Q(B)H)(*) --> Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-)], were found to be slowed by factors of approximately 10 and approximately 4, respectively. Evidence that the observed changes in the double mutant RC are due to a reduction in the proton-transfer rate constants are provided by the observations: (i) k(AB)(1) at pH approximately pK(a) of GluH became biphasic, indicating that proton transfer is slower than electron transfer and (ii) k(AB)(2) became independent of the driving force for electron transfer, indicating that proton transfer is the rate-limiting step. These changes were overcome by the addition of exogenous imidazole which acts as a proton donor in place of the imidazole groups of His that were removed in the double mutant RC. Thus, we conclude that His-H126 and His-H128 facilitate proton transfer into the RC, acting as RC-bound proton donors at the entrance of the proton-transfer pathways.

Simultaneous replacement of Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn increases proton uptake by Glu-L212 upon first electron transfer to QB in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

In the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, the first electron transfer to the secondary quinone acceptor Q(B) is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212, located approximately 5 A from the center of Q(B). Upon the second electron transfer to Q(B), Glu-L212 is involved in fast proton delivery to the reduced Q(B). Since Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 play an important role in the proton transfer to the Q(B) site [Paddock, M. L., Adelroth, P., Chang, C., Abresch, E. C., Feher, G., and Okamura, M. Y. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6893-6902], we investigated the effects of replacing one or both Asp residues with Asn on proton uptake by Glu-L212 using FTIR difference spectroscopy. Upon the first electron transfer to Q(B), the amplitude of the proton uptake by Glu-L212 at pH 8 is increased in the single and double mutant RCs, as is evident from the larger intensity (by 35-55%) of the carboxylic acid band at 1727 cm(-1) in the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) difference spectra of mutant RCs, compared to that at 1728 cm(-1) in native RCs. This implies that the extent of ionization of Glu-L212 in the Q(B) ground state is greater in the mutants than in native RCs and that Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 are at least partially ionized near neutral pH in native RCs. In addition, no changes in the protonation state or the environment of these two residues are detected upon Q(B) reduction. The absence of the 1727 cm(-1) signal in all of the RCs lacking Glu-L212, confirms that the positive band at 1728-1727 cm(-1) probes the protonation of Glu-L212 in native and mutant RCs.

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: cooperation between Asp-M17 and Asp-L210 facilitates proton transfer to the secondary quinone (QB)

The reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides uses light energy to reduce and protonate a quinone molecule, Q(B) (the secondary quinone electron acceptor), to form quinol, Q(B)H2. Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 have been proposed to be components of the pathway for proton transfer [Axelrod, H. L., Abresch, E. C., Paddock, M. L., Okamura, M. Y., and Feher, G. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1542-1547]. To test the importance of these residues for efficient proton transfer, the rates of the proton-coupled electron-transfer reaction k(AB)(2) (Q(A-*)Q(B-*) + H+ <==>Q(A-*)Q(B)H* --> Q(A)Q(B)H-) and its associated proton uptake were measured in native and mutant RCs, lacking one or both Asp residues. In the double mutant RCs, the k(AB)(2) reaction and its associated proton uptake were approximately 300-fold slower than in native RCs (pH 8). In contrast, single mutant RCs displayed reaction rates that were < or =3-fold slower than native (pH 8). In addition, the rate-limiting step of k(AB)(2) was changed from electron transfer (native and single mutants) to proton transfer (double mutant) as shown from the lack of a dependence of the observed rate on the driving force for electron transfer in the double mutant RCs compared to the native or single mutants. This implies that the rate of the proton-transfer step was reduced (> or =10(3)-fold) upon replacement of both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17 with Asn. Similar, but less drastic, differences were observed for k(AB)(1), which at pH > or =8 is coupled to the protonation of Glu-L212 [(Q(A-*)Q(B))-Glu- + H+ --> (Q(A)Q(B-*)-GluH]. These results show that the pathway for proton transfer from solution to reduced Q(B) involves both Asp-L210 and Asp-M17, which provide parallel branches to the proton-transfer pathway and through their electrostatic interaction have a cooperative effect on the proton-transfer rate. A possible mechanism for the cooperativity is discussed.

Proton uptake associated with the reduction of the primary quinone Q(A) influences the binding site of the secondary quinone Q(B) in Rhodopseudomonas viridis photosynthetic reaction centers

Previously, two binding sites for the secondary quinone Q(B) in the photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodopseudomonas viridis were identified by X-ray crystallography, a 'proximal' binding site close to the non-heme iron, and a 'distal' site, displaced by 4.2 A along the path of the isoprenoid tail [C.R.D. Lancaster and H. Michel, Structure 5 (1997) 1339-1359]. The quinone ring planes in the two sites differ by roughly a 180 degrees rotation around the isoprenoid tail. Here we present molecular dynamics simulations, which support the theory of a spontaneous transfer of Q(B) between the distal site and the proximal site. In contrast to earlier computational studies on RCs, the molecular dynamics simulations of Q(B) migration resulted in a proximal Q(B) binding pattern identical to that of the crystallographic findings. Also, we demonstrate that the preference towards the proximal Q(B) location is not necessarily attributed to reduction of Q(B) to the semiquinone, but already to the preceding reduction of the primary quinone Q(A) and resulting protonation changes in the protein. Energy mapping of the Q(B) binding pocket indicates that the quinone ring rotation required for completion of the transfer between the two sites is improbable at the distal or proximal binding sites due to high potential barriers, but may be possible at a newly identified position near the distal binding site.

Trapping conformational intermediate states in the reaction center protein from photosynthetic bacteria

In protein, conformational changes are often crucial for function but not easy to observe. Two functionally relevant conformational intermediate states of photosynthetic reaction center protein (RCs) are trapped and characterized at low temperature. RCs frozen in the dark do not allow electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone, Q(A)(-), to the secondary quinone, Q(B). In contrast, RCs frozen under illumination in the product (P(+)Q(A)Q(B)(-)) state, with the oxidized electron donor, P(+), and reduced Q(B)(-), return to the ground state at cryogenic temperature in a conformation that allows a high yield of Q(B) reduction. Thus, RCs frozen under illumination are found to be trapped above the ground state in a conformation that allows product formation. When the temperature is raised above 120 K, the protein relaxes to an inactive conformation which is different from the RCs frozen in the dark. The activation energy for this change is 87 +/- 8 meV, and the active and inactive states differ in energy by only 16 +/- 3 meV. Thus, there are several conformational substates along the reaction coordinate with different transition temperatures. The ground state spectra of the RCs in active and inactive conformations report differences in the intraprotein electrostatic field, demonstrating that the dipole or charge distribution has changed. In addition, the electrochromic shift associated with the Q(A)(-) to Q(B) electron transfer at low temperature was characterized. The electron-transfer rate from Q(B)(-) to P(+) was measured at cryogenic temperature and is similar to the rate at room temperature, as expected for an exothermic, electron tunneling reaction in RCs.

Equilibrium and kinetic parameters for the binding of inhibitors to the QB pocket in bacterial chromatophores: dependence on the state of QA

The equilibrium and kinetic parameters for the binding of various inhibitors to the Q(B) pocket of the bacterial reaction center were investigated in chromatophores from Rhodobacter capsulatus and Rhodobacter sphaeroides. By monitoring the near-IR absorption changes specific to Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-), we measured the fraction of inhibited centers in the dark and the kinetics and extent of inhibitor displacement after one flash due to the formation of the Q(A)Q(B)(-) state. The inhibitor release rate was much faster for triazines and o-phenanthroline (t(1/2) in the 50 ms to 1 s range) than for stigmatellin (t(1/2) approximately 20 s). For inhibitors with a rapid release rate, the fast phase of P(+) decay observed in the absence of secondary donor reflects the competition between P(+)Q(A)(-) recombination and inhibitor release: it is thus faster than the P(+)Q(A)(-) recombination, and its relative extent is smaller than the fraction of initially inhibited centers. At appropriate inhibitor concentrations, one can have almost total binding in the dark and almost total inhibitor displacement after one flash. Under such conditions, a pair of closely spaced flashes resets the two-electron gate in a single state (Q(A)Q(B)(-)), irrespective of the initial state. The apparent dissociation constant of terbutryn was significantly increased (by a factor of 4-7) in the presence of Q(A)(-), in agreement with the conclusion of Wraight and co-workers [Stein, R. R., et al. (1984) J. Cell. Biochem. 24, 243-259]. We suggest that this effect is essentially due to a tighter binding of ubiquinone in the Q(A)(-) state.

Protein control of the redox potential of the primary quinone acceptor in reactioncCenters from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The role of the protein environment in determining the redox midpoint potential (E(m)) of Q(A), the primary quinone of bacterial reaction centers, was investigated by mutation of isoleucine at position 265 of the M subunit in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Isoleucine was changed to threonine, serine, and valine, yielding mutants M265IT, M265IS, and M265IV, respectively. All three mutants, with smaller residues replacing isoleucine, exhibited decreased binding affinities of the Q(A) site for various quinone analogues, consistent with an enlargement or loosening of the headgroup binding domain and a decrease in the van der Waals contact for small quinones. In all other respects, M265IV was like the wild type, but the polar mutants, M265IT and M265IS, had unexpectedly dramatic decreases in the redox midpoint potential of Q(A), resulting in faster rates of P(+)Q(A)(-) charge recombination. For both anthraquinone and native ubiquinone, the in situ E(m) of Q(A) was estimated to be approximately 100 and 85 mV lower in M265IT and M265IS, respectively. The effect on E(m)(Q(A)) indicates destabilization of the semiquinone or stabilization of the quinone. This is suggested to arise from either (i) electrostatic interaction between the partial charges or dipole of the residue hydroxyl group and the charge distribution of quinone and semiquinone states with particular influence near the C4 carbonyl group or (ii) from hydrogen bonding interactions between the hydroxyl oxygen and the N(delta)H of histidine M219, causing a weakening of the hydrogen bond to the C4 carbonyl. The rate of the first electron transfer (k(AB)(()(1)())) in the polar mutants was the same as in the wild type at low pH but decelerated at higher pH with altered pH dependence. The rate of the second electron transfer (k(AB)(()(2)())) was 3-4-fold greater than in the wild type over the whole pH range from 4 to 11, consistent with a larger driving force for electron transfer derived from the lower E(m) of Q(A).

Effect of metal binding on electrogenic proton transfer associated with reduction of the secondary electron acceptor (QB) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chromatophores

The influence of metal ion (Cd(2+), Zn(2+), Ni(2+)) binding on the electrogenic phases of proton transfer connected with reduction of quinone Q(B) in chromatophores from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was studied by time-resolved electric potential changes. In the presence of metals, the electrogenic transients associated with proton transfer on first and second flash at pH 8 were found to be slower by factors of 3-6. This is essentially the same effect of metal binding that was observed on optical transients in isolated reaction centers (RC), where the metal ion was shown to inhibit proton transfer [Paddock, M. L., Graige, M. S., Feher, G., and Okamura, M. Y. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 6183-6188]. The effect of metal binding on the kinetics in chromatophores is, therefore, similarly attributed to inhibition of proton uptake, which becomes rate-limiting. A striking observation was an increase in the amplitude of the electrogenic proton-uptake phase after the first flash with bound metal ion. We attribute this to a loss of internal proton rearrangement, requiring that the protons that stabilize Q(B)(-) come from solution. In mutant RCs, in which His-H126 and His-H128 are replaced with Ala, the apparent binding of Cd(2+) and Ni(2+) was decreased, showing that the binding site of these metal ions is the same as found in RC crystals [Axelrod, H. L., Abresch, E. C., Paddock, M. L., Okamura, M. Y., and Feher, G. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 1542-1547]. Therefore, the unique proton entry point near His-H126, His-H128, and Asp-M17 that was identified in isolated RCs is also the entry point in chromatophores.

Interactions between the donor and acceptor sides in bacterial reaction centers

The apparent equilibrium constant K'(2) for electron transfer between the primary (Q(A)) and secondary (Q(B)) quinone acceptors of the reaction center was measured in chromatophores of Rhodobacter capsulatus. In the presence of the oxidized primary donor P(+), we obtained a value of K'(2)(P(+)) approximately 100 at pH 7.2, based on the rates of recombination from P(+)Q(A-) and P(+)Q(B-). K'(2) was also measured in the presence of reduced P, from the damping of semiquinone oscillations during a series of single turnover flashes. A 5-fold smaller value, K'(2)(P) approximately 20, was found. Additional information on the interactions between the donor and acceptor sides was obtained by measuring the shift of the midpoint potential of P caused by the presence of Q(B-) or Q(A-)S (where S indicates the presence of the inhibitor stigmatellin). A stabilization of the oxidized state P(+) was observed in both instances, by 10 mV for Q(B-) and 30 mV for Q(A-)S. The larger stabilization of P(+)Q(A-)S with respect to P(+)Q(B-) does not account for the effect of P(+)/P on K'(2). Analysis of these results indicates that the interactions between P(+)/P and Q(A)/Q(A)(-) are markedly modified depending on the occupancy of the Q(B) pocket by ubiquinone or by stigmatellin. We propose that the large value of K'(2)(P(+)) results essentially from a conformational destabilization of the P(+)Q(A-) state, that is relieved when the proximal site of the Q(B) pocket is occupied by stigmatellin.

Fourier transform infrared evidence of proton uptake by glutamate L212 upon reduction of the secondary quinone QB in the photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter capsulatus

The photoreduction of the secondary quinone Q(B) in native reaction centers (RCs) of Rhodobacter capsulatus and in RCs from the GluL212 --> Gln and GluL212 --> Ala mutants has been investigated at pH 7 in (1)H(2)O and (2)H(2)O by light-induced Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) difference spectroscopy. The Q(B)(-)/Q(B) FTIR difference spectra reflect changes of quinone-protein interactions and of protonation state of carboxylic acid groups as well as reorganization of the protein upon electron transfer. Comparison of Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of native and mutant RCs indicates that the interactions between Q(B) or Q(B)(-) and the protein are similar in all RCs. A differential signal at approximately 1650/1640 cm(-1), which is common to all the spectra, is associated with a movement of a peptide carbonyl or a side chain following Q(B) reduction. On the other hand, Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra of native and mutant RCs display several differences, notably between 1700 and 1650 cm(-1) (amide I and side chains), between 1570 and 1530 cm(-1) (amide II), and at 1728-1730 cm(-1) (protonated carboxylic acid groups). In particular, the latter region in native RCs is characterized by a main positive band at 1728 cm(-1) and a negative signal at 1739 cm(-1). In the L212 mutants, the amplitude of the positive band is strongly decreased leading to a differential signal at 1739/1730 cm(-1) that is insensitive to (1)H/(2)H isotopic exchange. In native RCs, only the 1728 cm(-1) band is affected in (2)H(2)O while the 1739 cm(-1) signal is not. The effects of the mutations and of (1)H/(2)H exchange on the Q(B)(-)/Q(B) spectra concur in the attribution of the 1728 cm(-1) band in native RCs to (partial) proton uptake by GluL212 upon the first electron transfer to Q(B), as previously observed in Rhodobacter sphaeroides RCs [Nabedryk, E., Breton, J., Hienerwadel, R., Fogel, C., Mäntele, W., Paddock, M. L., and Okamura, M. Y. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 14722-14732]. More generally, strong homologies of the Q(B) to Q(B)(-) transition in the RCs from Rb. sphaeroides and Rb. capsulatus are detected by differential FTIR spectroscopy. The FTIR data are discussed in relation with the results from global proton uptake measurements and electrogenic events concomitant with the reduction of Q(B) and with a model of the Q(B) turnover in Rb. sphaeroides RCs [Mulkidjanian, A. Y. (1999) FEBS Lett. 463, 199-204].

Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: both protons associated with reduction of QB to QBH2 share a common entry point

The reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides uses light energy for the reduction and protonation of a quinone molecule, Q(B). This process involves the transfer of two protons from the aqueous solution to the protein-bound Q(B) molecule. The second proton, H(+)(2), is supplied to Q(B) by Glu-L212, an internal residue protonated in response to formation of Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-). In this work, the pathway for H(+)(2) to Glu-L212 was studied by measuring the effects of divalent metal ion binding on the protonation of Glu-L212, which was assayed by two types of processes. One was proton uptake from solution after the one-electron reduction of Q(A) (DQ(A)-->D(+)Q(A)(-)) and Q(B) (DQ(B)-->D(+)Q(B)(-)), studied by using pH-sensitive dyes. The other was the electron transfer k(AB)((1)) (Q(A)(-)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(B)(-)). At pH 8.5, binding of Zn(2+), Cd(2+), or Ni(2+) reduced the rates of proton uptake upon Q(A)(-) and Q(B)(-) formation as well as k(AB)((1)) by approximately an order of magnitude, resulting in similar final values, indicating that there is a common rate-limiting step. Because D(+)Q(A)(-) is formed 10(5)-fold faster than the induced proton uptake, the observed rate decrease must be caused by an inhibition of the proton transfer. The Glu-L212-->Gln mutant reaction centers displayed greatly reduced amplitudes of proton uptake and exhibited no changes in rates of proton uptake or electron transfer upon Zn(2+) binding. Therefore, metal binding specifically decreased the rate of proton transfer to Glu-L212, because the observed rates were decreased only when proton uptake by Glu-L212 was required. The entry point for the second proton H(+)(2) was thus identified to be the same as for the first proton H(+)(1), close to the metal binding region Asp-H124, His-H126, and His-H128.