Ghost cells in calcifying odontogenic cyst express enamel-related proteins

Immunohistochemical expression of SPARC in odontogenic keratocysts: a comparative study with other odontogenic cysts

BACKGROUND

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) has been shown to modulate aggressive behavior in several benign and malignant tumors. Little is known about SPARC expression in odontogenic keratocyst (OKC), an odontogenic cyst with an aggressive nature. To the best of our knowledge, only one study has been investigated the expression of this protein in OKCs. This study aimed to characterize SPARC expression in OKCs. Additionally, to determine whether SPARC is associated with aggressive behavior in OKCs, SPARC expression in OKCs was compared with radicular cysts (RCs), dentigerous cysts (DCs) and calcifying odontogenic cysts (COCs). These odontogenic cysts showed no or less aggressive behavior.

METHODS

SPARC expression was evaluated in 38 OKCs, 39 RCs, 35 DCs and 14 COCs using immunohistochemistry. The percentages of positive cells and the intensities of immunostaining in the epithelial lining and the cystic wall were evaluated and scored.

RESULTS

Generally, OKCs showed similar staining patterns to RCs, DCs and COCs. In the epithelial lining, SPARC was not detected, except for ghost cells in all COCs. In the cystic wall, the majority of positive cells were fibroblasts. Compared between 4 groups of odontogenic cysts, SPARC expression in OKCs was significantly higher than those of RCs (P < 0.001), DCs (P < 0.001) and COCs (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant increase of SPARC expression in OKCs compared with RCs, DCs and COCs suggests that SPARC may play a role in the aggressive behavior of OKCs.

A rare case of dentinogenic ghost cell tumor with concomitant odontoma

Key Clinical Message

A case of dentinogenic ghost cell tumor occurring simultaneously with a clinically diagnosed odontoma. The occurrence of epithelial and mesenchymal tumors at the same site is very rare, but should be kept in mind during pathological diagnosis.

Abstract

Dentinogenic ghost cell tumor (DGCT) is a rare and benign odontogenic tumor composed of ghost cells, calcified tissue, and dentin. We present an extremely rare case of a 32-year-old female who was clinically diagnosed with an odontoma presenting with a painless swelling in her maxilla. Radiographic examination showed a well-defined radiolucent lesion with tooth-like calcified areas. The tumor was resected under general anesthesia. No recurrence was noted at the 12-month follow-up. Histopathological examination of the surgically resected tumor yielded a diagnosis of DGCT with odontoma.

Ghost cells unveiled: A comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Ghost cells (GCs) are cells with distinct intracytoplasmic keratinization, which leads to the preservation of the cellular outline with a clear area corresponding to the previous nucleus location. GCs may show various patterns, such as degeneration, tissue granulation, and calcification. Their true nature and the mechanism regulating the conversion of odontogenic epithelial cells into GCs remain unclear. GC keratinization is different from normal keratinization as they are larger than keratotic squames, are frequently vacuolated, and have prominent nuclear membrane remnants. Few cystic lesions, odontogenic tumors, and non-odontogenic tumors, such as calcifying odontogenic cyst, craniopharyngioma, pilomatrixoma, odontoma, dentinogenic ghost cell tumor, and ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma, exhibit GCs as a typical feature. The Wnt and Notch signaling pathways play a role in the histogenesis of the neoplasms.

HIGHLIGHT

The review clarifies the various proposed hypotheses of the histogenesis of GCs, including molecular pathogenesis. Diagnostic workup for the identification of GCs, including special staining and immunohistochemistry, has been extensively discussed. A stepwise algorithm for identifying odontogenic and non-odontogenic lesions containing GCs has been proposed. Additionally, the prognostic role of GCs in the lesions has been elucidated.

CONCLUSION

Among the various hypotheses of the origin of GCs, we suggest that aberrant keratinization is the most accepted based on various immunohistochemical studies and special staining characteristics. GCs are a distinct characteristic entity of many odontogenic and non-odontogenic lesions; however, it remains controversial whether their presence has any pathognomonic role in the biological nature of these lesions.

Ghost cell

Ghost cells (GCs) have been a curious topic since a great deal of time. Extensive research has been done to deduce the true characteristics and formation of these cells. GCs are balloon-shaped, elliptical, pale eosinophilic epithelial cells with pyknotic nuclei, leaving only a faint outline. In routine H and E staining, these cells give shadowy appearance and hence are also called shadow cells or translucent cells. The present article is an attempt to describe in detail about the origin, microscopic appearance, staining property, immunohistochemistry profile and diagnostic importance of GCs.

Ghost cell characterization in calcifying odontogenic cysts and dentinogenic ghost cell tumors: An immunohistochemical study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to ascertain the true nature of ghost cells (GCs) by immunolocalization of cytokeratin (CK) 6, CK19, and amelogenin in calcifying odontogenic cysts (COCs) and dentinogenic ghost cell tumors (DGCTs) in an attempt to determine the nature of this unique cell.

METHODS

A total of thirteen cases (six COCs and seven DGCTs) were examined immunohistochemically, in order to compare immunoreactivity for CK6, CK19, and amelogenin in odontogenic GCs.

RESULTS

Positive expression of amelogenin (92.3%) and CK6 (77%) was chiefly found in GCs. CK19 expression was observed in the cytoplasm of odontogenic epithelial cells of the lining epithelium. GCs were devoid of CK19 expression and were positive only on the cytoplasmic periphery.

CONCLUSION

In the current study, GCs showed accumulation of amelogenin and hard keratins in their cytoplasm during pathological transformation.

Amelogenin is a Potential Biomarker for the Aggressiveness in Odontogenic Tumors

Amelogenin (AMEL), the major structural protein of the enamel organic matrix, constitutes more than 90% of the enamel’s protein content, Aberrations of amelogenin are thought to be involved in the oncogenesis of odontogenic epithelium. The expression of amelogenin is possibly an indicator of differentiation of epithelial cells in the odontogenic tumors. Aim of the study: Investigating the expression of amelogenin in some odontogenic tumors, using an anti-amelogenin polyclonal antibody, and then compare it with AMEL expression in tooth buds as control. Materials and Methods: study sample consisted of 10 formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded specimens of ameloblastoma, 10 Keratocystic odontogenic tumors, and 10 tooth buds were conventionally stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemically with AMEL polyclonal antibody. Results: All of the odontogenic tumors expressed AMEL in the epithelial component, Intensity of expression in ameloblastoma and Keratocystic odontogenic tumor was lower, compared with tooth buds, Statistical analysis indicated a significant differences between the tumors and tooth buds. Conclusion: Amelogenin can be used as a marker for odontogenic epithelium, and the expression of amelogenin is possibly an indicator of epithelial cells differentiation in the odontogenic tumors, and therefore in prediction of the histological behavior of odontogenic tumors.

An evolutionarily conserved non-coding element in casein locus acts as transcriptional repressor

In mammals, the casein locus consists of stretches of non-coding DNA, the functions of most of which are unknown. These regions are believed to harbour elements responsible for spatio-temporally regulated expression of genes in this locus and so far, only a few such elements have been identified. In this study, we report a novel regulatory element in the casein locus. Comparative analysis of genomic DNA sequences of casein loci from different mammals identified a 147bp long evolutionarily conserved region (ECR) upstream of Odam, a gene in this locus. The ECR was found in close proximity of Odam gene in all the mammals examined. In-silico analysis predicted the ECR as a potential regulatory element. Functional analysis in different cell lines identified it as a unidirectional repressor element. From our findings we speculate that the ECR may be involved in the repression of the Odam expression in the mammary gland during lactation.

Ghost cells in pilomatrixoma, craniopharyngioma, and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor: histological, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural study

BACKGROUND

Pilomatrixoma, craniopharyngioma, and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor are the main entities presenting ghost cells as an important histological feature, in spite their quite different clinical presentation; it seems that they share a common pathway in the formation of these cells. The aim of this study is to examine and compare the characteristics of ghost and other cells that form these lesions.

METHODS

Forty-three cases including 21 pilomatrixomas, 14 craniopharyngiomas, and eight calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for cytokeratins, CD138, β-catenin, D2-40, Glut-1, FAS, CD10 and also by scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

The CKs, CD138, β-catenin, Glut-1, FAS, and CD10 were more often expressed by transitional cells of craniopharyngioma and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor, compared with pilomatrixoma. Basaloid cells of pilomatrixoma showed strong positivity for CD138 and CD10. Differences on expression pattern were identified in transitional and basal cells, as ghost cells were negative for most antibodies used, except by low expression for cytokeratins. By scanning electron microscopy, the morphology of ghost cells were similar in their fibrillar cytoplasm, but their pattern varied from sheets in pilomatrixoma to small clusters in craniopharyngioma and calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Mechanisms involved in formation of ghost cells are unknown, but probably they follow different pathways as protein expression in the basal/transitional cells was not uniform in the three tumors studied.

Detection of cytokeratins in ghost cells of calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor indicates an altered keratinization and hair follicle differentiation for their development

Calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors (CCOTs) are benign cystic lesions of odontogenic origin characterized by an ameloblastoma-like epithelium and the presence of a group of cells named ghost cells. The pattern of cytokeratin (Ck) expression on these lesions remains unclear and needs to be clarified. To this end, the expression of Ck6, Ck13, Ck14, Ck18, and Ck19 in the epithelium lining of 7 cases of CCOTs was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. For this, the epithelium lining was divided into 3 distinct regions: basal layer, suprabasal layer, and the compartment composed of ghost cells. In this study, 6 cases (85.7%) were classified as type 1 and 1 (14.3%) as type 4. All cases were negative for Ck13 and Ck18, despite the epithelial layer, as well as in the ghost cells. Ck6 was only positive in the ghost cells. Positivity for Ck14 and Ck19 was found in the basal and suprabasal layers, including the ghost cells. The results showing positivity for Ck14 and Ck19 in all of the analyzed cases reinforce CCOT as being of odontogenic origin, and the restricted expression of Ck6 in the ghost cells may be indicative that these cells suffer an altered differentiation into hair follicles in CCOTs.

Dental enamel development: proteinases and their enamel matrix substrates

This review focuses on recent discoveries and delves in detail about what is known about each of the proteins (amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin) and proteinases (matrix metalloproteinase-20 and kallikrein-related peptidase-4) that are secreted into the enamel matrix. After an overview of enamel development, this review focuses on these enamel proteins by describing their nomenclature, tissue expression, functions, proteinase activation, and proteinase substrate specificity. These proteins and their respective null mice and human mutations are also evaluated to shed light on the mechanisms that cause nonsyndromic enamel malformations termed amelogenesis imperfecta. Pertinent controversies are addressed. For example, do any of these proteins have a critical function in addition to their role in enamel development? Does amelogenin initiate crystallite growth, does it inhibit crystallite growth in width and thickness, or does it do neither? Detailed examination of the null mouse literature provides unmistakable clues and/or answers to these questions, and this data is thoroughly analyzed. Striking conclusions from this analysis reveal that widely held paradigms of enamel formation are inadequate. The final section of this review weaves the recent data into a plausible new mechanism by which these enamel matrix proteins support and promote enamel development.

Expression of basement membrane components in odontogenic tumors

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to characterize the expression of BMCs (laminins 1 and 5, collagen type IV, and fibronectin) in ameloblastomas, calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors (CCOTs), and adenomatoid odontogenic tumors (AOTs).

STUDY DESIGN

BMCs were analyzed in 14 ameloblastomas, 7 CCOTs, and 7 AOTs using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

In normal oral mucosa, linear deposits of these proteins were found at the epithelial-mesenchymal junction, but not in epithelial cytoplasm. In all tumors studied, linear deposits of all proteins were found at the epithelial-mesenchymal junction; laminin 1 was expressed in all tumor cells, regardless of cell types. For CCOTs, laminin 5 was found faintly in suprabasal cells, but expressed strongly in ghost cells. For AOTs, laminin 5 strongly decorated tumor cells adjacent to mineralization.

CONCLUSIONS

Laminin 1 may be a marker for odontogenic epithelium. Additionally, laminin 5 may be involved in ghost cell formation and initiation of calcification.

Analysis of ghost cells in calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors by confocal laser scanning microscopy

OBJECTIVE

The confocal laser scanning microscope represents an effective tool for studying biological samples stained for fluorescence observation. In this study we have used the confocal microscope to analyze ghost cells in calcifying cystic odontogenic tumors.

STUDY DESIGN

Specimens from 15 calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor cases were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and scanned by a confocal laser scanning microscope to generate optically sectioned images.

RESULTS

All of the analyzed samples presented autofluorescent cells that were identified as ghost cells. The degree of autofluorescence intensity was variable and may be a result of the presence of hard keratin.

CONCLUSION

The confocal laser scanning microscope may be of help in analyzing and defining the nature and extent of keratinization processes in calcifying cystic odontogenic tumor ghost cells.

MMP-20 is predominately a tooth-specific enzyme with a deep catalytic pocket that hydrolyzes type V collagen

Matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP-20, enamelysin) has a highly restricted pattern of expression. In healthy tissues, MMP-20 is observed in the enamel organ and pulp organ of developing teeth and is present only as an activated enzyme. To identify other tissues that may express MMP-20, we performed a systematic mouse tissue expression screen. Among the non-tooth tissues assayed, MMP-20 transcripts were identified only in minute quantities within the large intestine. The murine Mmp20 promoter was cloned, sequenced, and assessed for potential tooth-specific regulatory elements. In silico analysis identified four promoter modules that were common to Mmp20 and at least two of three coregulated predominantly tooth-specific genes that encode ameloblastin, amelogenin, and enamelin. We asked if the highly restricted MMP-20 expression pattern was associated with a broad substrate specificity that might preclude its expression in other tissues. An iterative mixture-based random doedecamer peptide library screen with Edman sequencing of MMP-20 cleavage products revealed that, among MMPs previously screened, MMP-20 had unique substrate preferences. These preferences indicate that MMP-20 has a deep and wide catalytic pocket that can accommodate substrates with large aromatic residues in the P1' position. On the basis of matrices derived from the peptide library data, we identified and then confirmed that type V collagen is an MMP-20 substrate. Since type V collagen is not present in dental enamel but is an otherwise widely distributed collagen, and since only active MMP-20 has been observed in teeth, our data suggest that control of MMP-20 activity is primarily regulated by transcriptional means.

Molecular pathology of odontogenic tumors

Odontogenic tumors are lesions derived from the elements of the tooth-forming apparatus and are found exclusively within the jawbones. This review represents a contemporary outline of our current understanding of the molecular and genetic alterations associated with the development and progression of odontogenic tumors, including oncogenes, tumor-suppressor genes, oncoviruses, growth factors, telomerase, cell cycle regulators, apoptosis-related factors, regulators of tooth development, hard tissue-related proteins, cell adhesion molecules, matrix-degrading proteinases, angiogenic factors, and osteolytic cytokines. It is hoped that better understanding of related molecular mechanisms will help to predict the course of odontogenic tumors and lead to the development of new therapeutic concepts for their management.

The genetics of amelogenesis imperfecta: a review of the literature

A melogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a group of inherited defects of dental enamel formation that show both clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Enamel findings in AI are highly variable, ranging from deficient enamel formation to defects in the mineral and protein content. Enamel formation requires the expression of multiple genes that transcribes matrix proteins and proteinases needed to control the complex process of crystal growth and mineralization. The AI phenotypes depend on the specific gene involved, the location and type of mutation, and the corresponding putative change at the protein level. Different inheritance patterns such as X-linked, autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive types have been reported. Mutations in the amelogenin, enamelin, and kallikrein-4 genes have been demonstrated to result in different types of AI and a number of other genes critical to enamel formation have been identified and proposed as candidates for AI. The aim of this article was to present an evaluation of the literature regarding role of proteins and proteinases important to enamel formation and mutation associated with AI.

Expression of enamel proteins and LEF1 in adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma: evidence for its odontogenic epithelial differentiation

AIMS

Adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma (ACP) resembles histologically some odontogenic tumours, such as ameloblastoma and calcifying odontogenic cyst. However, there has been no evidence that ACP differentiates also functionally as odontogenic epithelium. The aim of this study was to gain evidence of odontogenic epithelial differentiation in ACP by means of immunohistochemistry. Among normal human tissues, enamel proteins are expressed exclusively in teeth, and lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1), in co-operation with beta-catenin, play an important role in tooth development. The expression of these proteins is therefore indicative of odontogenic epithelial differentiation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The expression of enamel proteins and LEF1 was examined in 10 adamantinomatous and six papillary craniopharyngiomas. All the ACPs showed a variable degree of enamel protein expression, including amelogenin, enamelin and enamelysin, mainly in ghost cells. LEF1 was also heterogeneously expressed in ACPs; remarkably, its expression pattern was identical to that of nuclear beta-catenin accumulation. In contrast, none of the papillary craniopharyngiomas expressed enamel proteins or LEF1.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ACP consistently shows odontogenic epithelial differentiation. Since ACPs harbour beta-catenin mutation, the inappropriate activation of beta-catenin/LEF1 complex-dependent transcription may play a critical role in ACP tumorigenesis.

Enamelysin (matrix metalloproteinase 20)-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype

Enamelysin is a tooth-specific matrix metalloproteinase that is expressed during the early through middle stages of enamel development. The enamel matrix proteins amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin are also expressed during this same approximate developmental time period, suggesting that enamelysin may play a role in their hydrolysis. In support of this interpretation, recombinant enamelysin was previously demonstrated to cleave recombinant amelogenin at virtually all of the precise sites known to occur in vivo. Thus, enamelysin is likely an important amelogenin-processing enzyme. To characterize the in vivo biological role of enamelysin during tooth development, we generated an enamelysin-deficient mouse by gene targeting. Although mice heterozygous for the mutation have no apparent phenotype, the enamelysin null mouse has a severe and profound tooth phenotype. Specifically, the null mouse does not process amelogenin properly, possesses an altered enamel matrix and rod pattern, has hypoplastic enamel that delaminates from the dentin, and has a deteriorating enamel organ morphology as development progresses. Our findings demonstrate that enamelysin activity is essential for proper enamel development.