Comparison of immunohistochemical and biochemical measurement of steroid receptors in primary breast cancer: evaluation of discordant findings

High incidence of germline BRCA mutation in patients with ER low-positive/PR low-positive/HER-2 neu negative tumors

BACKGROUND

The 2015 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend that genetic counseling and germline BRCA mutation testing be offered to women under age 60 with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). As a result of the 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines for breast cancer, patients with breast cancers that are estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) low-positive (1%-9% on immunohistochemistry) are no longer strictly considered to have TNBC and may not be referred for genetic counseling. However, the incidence of BRCA mutation in patients with hormone receptor (HR) low-positive breast cancers remains unknown, and current ASCO/CAP guidelines may result in undertesting for BRCA mutations.

METHODS

A prospectively maintained research database of breast cancer patients evaluated at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2004 and 2014 was reviewed; 314 patients were identified with HER2/neu-negative breast cancers expressing ER and PR <10% with known BRCA mutation status.

RESULTS

Three hundred fourteen patients had breast cancers expressing ER and PR <10%; 238 (75.8%) had HR-negative cancers (<1% ER and PR), and 76 (24.2%) had HR-low-positive cancers (1%-9% ER and/or PR). Among patients with HR-negative tumors, 86 of 238 (36.1%) had a BRCA1/2 mutation, whereas in the HR-low-positive group, 30 of 76 (39.5%) had a BRCA1/2 mutation. In multivariate analysis, HR status (<1% vs 1%-9%) was not significantly associated with BRCA1/2 mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of BRCA1/2 mutations is similar in patients with HR-low-positive breast cancer and patients with HR-negative breast cancer. Genetic counseling and BRCA testing should be offered to patients under age 60 who have HR-low-positive breast cancers. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Factors associated with concordant estrogen receptor expression at diagnosis and centralized re-assay in a Danish population-based breast cancer study

BACKGROUND

Estrogen receptor (ER) expression predicts tamoxifen response, which halves the risk of breast cancer recurrence. We examined clinical factors associated with concordance between ER expression at diagnosis and centralized re-assay, and the association of concordance with breast cancer recurrence.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used immunohistochemistry to assess ER expression on archived fixed, paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma tissue excised from women aged 35-69 years, diagnosed 1985-2001 in Jutland, Denmark. We calculated the percentage agreement, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of ER status at diagnosis and re-assay. We used logistic regression to investigate factors associated with concordance, and its association with recurrence (odds ratios (OR) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)).

RESULTS

ER was re-assayed in 91% of patients (n = 1530). Concordance was better in ER + than ER- tumors (PPV = 94% vs. NPV = 75%). Factors associated with concordance included menopausal status, tumor size, surgical procedure, diagnostic period, lymph node status and time to recurrence. ER + women at diagnosis who re-assayed ER + were less likely to have recurrent disease (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.28, 0.86) than those who re-assayed ER-. In originally ER- women, concordance was not associated with recurrence (OR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.66, 1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Several clinical factors were associated with ER assay concordance. Some women were ineffectively treated with tamoxifen, or required but did not receive tamoxifen. We observed almost exactly the protective effect of endocrine therapy among tamoxifen-treated ER + women whose tumors expressed the ER on re-assay, compared with those ER- on re-assay. Diagnostic pathology results for ER + tumors appear a valid and useful resource for research studies. However, those for ER- tumors have lower validity. Study-specific considerations regarding the aims, diagnostic period, and consequences of including ER- patients with truly ER + disease ought to be examined when using diagnostic pathology results for ER- tumors in research studies.

Immunohistochemistry compared to cytosol assays for determination of estrogen receptor and prediction of the long-term effect of adjuvant tamoxifen

The purpose of this study is to compare immunohistochemistry (IHC) and cytosol-based assays for determination of estrogen receptor (ER) and prediction of response to adjuvant tamoxifen treatment in postmenopausal women with early-stage invasive breast cancer. The Stockholm Breast Cancer Study Group conducted a randomized trial during 1976 through 1990 comparing adjuvant tamoxifen versus control. The patients were stratified according to tumor size and lymph node status in high-risk and low-risk groups. In this study we evaluated 683 patients with "low risk" breast cancer (size ≤30 mm, lymph node-negative) for whom ER status had been determined by both the cytosol assays and IHC at one pathology laboratory. The median follow-up was 17 years. Six hundred eighty-three patients had tumors with ER determined by both methods, 536 (78.5%) were ER-positive by cytosol assays using the cutoff level at ≥0.05 fmol/μg DNA and 539 patients were ER-positive (79%) by IHC using the cutoff level at ≥10% cell stained. Thirty-nine tumors (5.7%) were ER-positive by cytosol but not by IHC, whereas the opposite pattern was found for 42 cases (6.1%). Only seven tumors had stained cells between 0 and 9% by IHC. The concordance between IHC and cytosol assays was high (88%). The kappa statistic was 0.65, 95% CI 0.58-0.72. Among patients classified as ER-negative no therapeutic benefit from tamoxifen was observed. Among patients with ER-expressing tumors, tamoxifen resulted in significantly better recurrence-free survival irrespective of the method (IHC: HR, 0.53, P < 0.001; cytosol: HR, 0.53, P < 0.001). The effect on overall survival was not statistically significant probably due to the limited sample size. Both IHC and cytosol assay accurately predict long-term response to adjuvant tamoxifen.

The breast cancer hormone receptor retesting controversy in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada: lessons for the health system

The treatment of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients with hormonal treatment is determined by the presence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer. In Newfoundland and Labrador (NL), 425 of 1088 (39.1%) patients who had original "negative" receptor tests conducted between 1997 and 2005, had positive results upon retesting in a specialized laboratory. This commentary addresses (1) the diagnostic utility of estrogen and progesterone testing for breast cancer in general, (2) specific testing problems that occurred in NL, (3) scientific problems associated with retesting, and (4) the impact on public trust and the resulting legal and political responses that occurred as a result of the adverse events associated with false-negative hormone receptor tests. Finally, the lessons learned will be discussed including known high false-negative rates associated with the tests and the bias associated with retesting, the need for quality assurance and national standards, public education, and appropriate communication with patients and the public.

Body weight and incidence of breast cancer defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status--a meta-analysis

Epidemiological evidence indicates that the association between body weight and breast cancer risk may differ across menopausal status as well as the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) tumor status. To date, no meta-analysis has been conducted to assess the association between body weight and ER/PR defined breast cancer risk, taking into account menopausal status and study design. We searched MEDLINE for relevant studies published from January 1, 1970 through December 31, 2007. Summarized risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. The summarized results of 9 cohorts and 22 case-control studies comparing the highest versus the reference categories of relative body weight showed that the risk for ER+PR+ tumors was 20% lower (95% CI=-30% to -8%) among premenopausal (2,643 cases) and 82% higher (95% CI=55-114%) among postmenopausal (5,469 cases) women. The dose-response meta-analysis of ER+PR+ tumors showed that each 5-unit increase in body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was associated with a 33% increased risk among postmenopausal women (95% CI=20-48%) and 10% decreased risk among premenopausal women (95% CI=-18% to -1%). No associations were observed for ER-PR- or ER+PR- tumors. For discordant tumors ER+PR- (pre) and ER-PR+ (pre/post) the number of cases were too small (<200) to interpret results. The relation between body weight and breast cancer risk is critically dependent on the tumor's ER/PR status and the woman's menopausal status. Body weight control is the effective strategy for preventing ER+PR+ tumors after menopause.

Immunohistochemical expression of hormone receptors and the histological characteristics of biochemically hormone receptor negative breast cancers

BACKGROUND

Most of the discordant cases between biochemical and immunohistochemical (IHC) assays for hormone receptor (HR) status in breast cancers are due to negative findings from the biochemical assay but positive IHC findings. However determining HR status based on IHC only in biochemically HR negative breast cancers has never been studied. The aim of this study is to examine the histological characteristics in immunohistochemically HR positive but biochemically HR negative breast cancers.

METHODS

IHC staining for HRs in 345 biochemically HR-negative breast cancers was done. The relationship between HR status by IHC and the histological characteristics was assessed.

RESULTS

In 345 cancers, 105 (30.4%) were estrogen receptor- (ER) or progesterone receptor- (PR) positive by IHC. The enzyme-immunoassay (EIA) HR titer was higher in immunohistochemically HR-positive tumors (ER: 2.7 fmol/mg protein; PR: 0.8 fmol/mg protein) than in negative tumors (0.6 fmol/mg protein in both HRs). IHC-assessed ER positivity on histological sections was high in some tumor types, such as mucinous carcinoma (77.8%), invasive micropapillary carcinoma (66.7%), and infiltrating ductal carcinoma of no special type with abundant stroma (60.2%). Among infiltrating ductal carcinomas of no special type, low nuclear grade tumors were all ER positive and high nuclear grade tumors showed low ER positivity by IHC, even in biochemically HR negative cancers.

CONCLUSION

The IHC-assessed HR status may reflect tumor cell behavior, such as overall and disease-free survival and endocrine response, better than HR status as assessed by the enzyme-immunoassay method. Immunohistochemically HR-positive but biochemically HR-negative breast cancers include infiltrating ductal carcinomas of no special type with low nuclear grade and some tumor types with high stromal content. We can assess the true HR status by IHC especially these tumors.

The p53 positive Bcl-2 negative phenotype is an independent marker of prognosis in breast cancer

The purpose of this work was to determine if the immunohistochemical p53 (+) Bcl-2 (-) phenotype predicts survival in breast cancer patients. Tissue from 819 cases of resected primary breast cancer, presented between 1986 and 1998, were assembled in tissue microarray format. Clinicopathological data and prospective disease specific survival data were collected prospectively and immunohistochemical analyses of p53 and Bcl-2 expression were performed using antibodies DO-7 (p53) and 124 (Bcl-2) employing a standard IHC protocol. The expression data were correlated with clinicopathological variables and outcomes in both univariate (chi(2)) and multivariate (Cox's regression) analyses. Abnormal p53 expression and positive Bcl-2 expression were detected in 29% (193/673) and 46% (307/673) of tumours, respectively. On univariate analysis Bcl-2 expression was correlated with the clinicopathological features of less aggressive disease and loss of Bcl-2 expression correlated with a reduction in survival (log rank = 11.91; p < 0.001). p53 expression correlated with the clinicopathological features of aggressive cancers and a reduction in survival (log rank = 17.81; p < 0.001). Nineteen percent (127/673) of tumours displayed a p53 (+) Bcl-2 (-) phenotype. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant reduction in survival in these cases (log rank 34.01; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that while neither p53 expression nor Bcl-2 expression alone had independent prognostic significance, the p53 (+) Bcl-2 (-) phenotype remained independently associated with a worse prognosis (HR 1.79 95%CI 1.10-2.89 p = 0.018).

Re-evaluating adjuvant breast cancer trials: assessing hormone receptor status by immunohistochemical versus extraction assays

BACKGROUND

Tumor levels of steroid hormone receptors, a factor used to select adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer, are currently determined with immunohistochemical assays. These assays have a discordance of 10%-30% with previously used extraction assays. We assessed the concordance and predictive value of hormone receptor status as determined by immunohistochemical and extraction assays on specimens from International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VIII and IX. These trials predominantly used extraction assays and compared adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy with endocrine therapy alone among pre- and postmenopausal patients with lymph node-negative breast cancer. Trial conclusions were that combination therapy provided a benefit to pre- and postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors but not to ER-positive postmenopausal patients. ER-positive premenopausal patients required further study.

METHODS

Tumor specimens from 571 premenopausal and 976 postmenopausal patients on which extraction assays had determined ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) levels before randomization from October 1, 1988, through October 1, 1999, were re-evaluated with an immunohistochemical assay in a central pathology laboratory. The endpoint was disease-free survival. Hazard ratios of recurrence or death for treatment comparisons were estimated with Cox proportional hazards regression models, and discriminatory ability was evaluated with the c index. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

Concordance of hormone receptor status determined by both assays ranged from 74% (kappa = 0.48) for PgR among postmenopausal patients to 88% (kappa = 0.66) for ER in postmenopausal patients. Hazard ratio estimates were similar for the association between disease-free survival and ER status (among all patients) or PgR status (among postmenopausal patients) as determined by the two methods. However, among premenopausal patients treated with endocrine therapy alone, the discriminatory ability of PgR status as determined by immunohistochemical assay was statistically significantly better (c index = 0.60 versus 0.51; P = .003) than that determined by extraction assay, and so immunohistochemically determined PgR status could predict disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Trial conclusions in which ER status (for all patients) or PgR status (for postmenopausal patients) was determined by immunohistochemical assay supported those determined by extraction assays. However, among premenopausal patients, trial conclusions drawn from PgR status differed--immunohistochemically determined PgR status could predict response to endocrine therapy, unlike that determined by the extraction assay.

Comparative analysis of the biochemical and immunohistochemical determination of hormone receptors in invasive breast carcinoma influence of the tumor-stroma ratio

Tumor samples obtained from 106 primary breast cancer patients were examined biochemically (DCCA) and immunohistochemically (IHC) for estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) to assess a quantitative relationship between both assays and to study the influence of the tumor-stroma ratio on this quantitative relationship. We used a model of logit transformation of IHC values (% of positive cells) and logarithmic transformation of DCCA values (fmol receptor/mg cytosolic protein). Tumors were subdivided into three categories according to the tumor-stroma ratio (more (t > s), equal amounts (t = s) or less (t < s) tumor than stroma), and the influence of the tumor-stroma ratio was studied using multiple regression analysis. We report a mathematical relationship between the results of the biochemical and immunohistochemical assays for the determination of ER status and PR status in primary breast cancer patients (ER: log DCCA(fmol/mg) = 0.369 logit (IHC(%pos cells)) + 2.328 (r = 0.573; p < 0.0001); PR: log DCCA (fmol/mg) = 0.474 logit (IHC(%pos cells)) + 0, 00 (r = 0.634; p < 0.0001)). In tumors overexpressing ER immunohistochemically (>10% nuclear positivity), median ER-DCCA is significantly higher if the tumor-stroma ratio is greater than 1. As these patients respond to hormonal treatment, depending on the degree of expression of both receptors, this study suggests that the biochemical assay be avoided because this technique is hampered by false-negative or falsely low results due to the loss of morphological information on the tumor-stroma ratio.

A novel spectral microscope system: application in quantitative pathology

In this paper, a novel spectral microscope system is presented together with a method for the quantitative assessment of the uptake by histologic samples of stains used in pathology to label tissue features of diagnostic importance. The critical component of the microscope is a variable interference filter-based monochromator. The system is capable of performing real-time spectral imaging in a plurality of spectral bands and micro-spectroscopy in any image pixel, in the spectral range 400-1000 nm. The wavelength-tuning step is 2.4-2.6 nm, while the full-width at half maximum in each step is about 1.5% of the operating central wavelength. The developed system integrates algorithms and calibration procedures for the calculation of the stain-uptake by the tissue. The acquired spectra from both stained tissue and calibration stain solutions enable the calculation of the concentration maps of the stains, even if the latter are multiple and overlap spatially and spectrally. The system was used for the quantitative mapping of the expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer cells. In this particular case, model validation shows that although two stains are employed, capturing of their transmittance at more than ten wavelengths is required in order to obtain an acceptable accuracy. These findings highlight the need for the development and implementation of spectral microscopy in pathology and its potential to introduce novel more reliable diagnostic criteria.

Assessment of interlaboratory variation in the immunohistochemical determination of estrogen receptor status using a breast cancer tissue microarray

The determination of tumor cell estrogen receptor (ER) expression status by immunohistochemical analysis has become standard practice, yet assay reproducibility has not been assessed adequately. By using a breast cancer tissue microarray, we examined interlaboratory variability in ER reporting. A 2-fold redundant tissue microarray block was created from 29 breast cancers. Unstained slides were distributed to 5 laboratories, and each laboratory immunostained and scored 1 slide for ER. Interlaboratory agreement ranged from moderate to high (overall kappa = 0.54 for 0-3+ grading; overall kappa = 0.84 for negative vs positive assessment of ER status). When 1 observer scored each of the 5 slides, interlaboratory agreement was slightly better (kappa = 0.63 for 0-3+ scoring; kappa = 0.96 for negative vs positive scoring). One laboratory, which had used an antibody and antigen retrieval method different from the others, demonstrated only fair concordance with the other 4 laboratories, but there was substantial intralaboratory interobserver agreement and excellent agreement with an outside observer reviewing the slide stained in that laboratory. The tissue microarray was an efficient and effective tool for identifying variability in ER reporting and should prove valuable in other external quality assurance programs.

Comparison of enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical measurements of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer patients

Before replacing enzyme immunoassay of estrogen and progesterone receptors by immunohistochemistry, results of both methods were compared on 437 samples obtained from breast cancer patients (342 primary breast carcinomas, 16 local recurrences, 49 biopsies, and 30 tumor specimens obtained after neoadjuvant treatment). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) results were first assessed semiquantitatively on the basis of the estimated proportion of positive tumor cells, and then quantitatively using the "quick score." Semiquantitative IHC hormone receptors results (positive > or = 10%) correlated well with enzyme immunoassay status (positive >15 fmol/mg protein) in 358 surgical samples (342 primary tumors and 16 recurrences), with overall concordance rates of 89.9% and 82.1%, respectively. Among the 100 discordant cases, a large intraductal carcinoma component was observed in 7 of 36 cases for estrogen receptor (ER) and 15 of 64 for progesterone receptor (PR). Thirty-five discordant cases also were observed near the cut-off values. Hormone receptor levels by enzyme immunoassay correlated strongly with the quantitative IHC "quick score." Whatever the method, hormone receptor status was associated with histologic grade (SBR) and tumor size, whereas age correlated strongly with ER positivity. Similar results were obtained for biopsy specimens and posttreatment samples. This comparison improved the reliability of the IHC technique, which is currently routinely used for ER and PR determination in the authors' institution.

2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

OBJECTIVE

To update the 1997 clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of breast and colorectal cancers. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials.

OPTIONS

Six tumor markers for colorectal cancer and eight for breast cancer were considered. They could be recommended or not for routine use or for special circumstances. In addition to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 15-3, CA 27.29 was also considered among the serum tumor markers for breast cancer.

OUTCOMES

In general, the significant health outcomes identified for use in making clinical practice guidelines (overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used.

EVIDENCE

A computerized literature search from 1994 to March 1999 was performed.

VALUES

The same values for use, utility, and levels of evidence were used by the committee.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

The same benefit, harms, and costs were used.

RECOMMENDATION

Changes were recommended (see Appendix).

VALIDATION

The updated recommendations were validated by external review by the American Society of Clinical Oncology's (ASCO's) Health Services Research Committee and by ASCO's Board of Directors.

SPONSOR

American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Influence of estrogen receptor variants on the determination of ER status in human breast cancer

Determination of estrogen receptor alpha (ER) status in breast cancer is an important predictive factor for clinical response to endocrine therapy. We have recently shown that discrepancies in ER status determined by immunohistochemical assay (ER-IHA) can occur between amino-terminal (1D5) and carboxyl-terminal (AER-311) targeted ER antibodies and that those tumors which demonstrate discordance are associated with increased expression of truncated ER variant mRNAs. In this study, we have explored this observation to examine if ER variant expression can exert a direct effect on ER-IHA or whether this association is attributable to the characteristics of the antibodies. ER negative cos-1 cells were transfected with expression vectors containing wild type ER (wt-ER) and/or a frequently expressed truncated variant, ER-clone-4 variant. We found that ER-IHA performed with the same N- and C-terminal targeting ER antibodies on cos-1 cells expressing wt-ER alone demonstrated no difference in signals by western blot (P > 0.1). However, co-expression of wt-ER and the truncated ER-clone-4 variant, resulted in discordant IHA results with relatively higher ER-IHA H-scores from N-terminal antibodies (P < 0.03). Furthermore, re-examination of a subset of breast tumors previously studied by ER-IHA showed persistent concordance in 4/5 cases and persistent differences in 3/5 cases with a different pair of ER antibodies. We conclude that the presence of truncated ER variant proteins can interfere with the interpretation of ER status determined by IHA and that this may account for some of the inconsistencies between ER status and response to endocrine therapy.