Phase II trial of docetaxel with dexamethasone premedication in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the Canadian experience

Positron Emission Tomography as a Method for Measuring Drug Delivery to Tumors in vivo: The Example of [(11)C]docetaxel

Systemic anticancer treatments fail in a substantial number of patients. This may be caused by inadequate uptake and penetration of drugs in malignant tumors. Consequently, improvement of drug delivery to solid tumors may enhance its efficacy. Before evaluating strategies to enhance drug uptake in tumors, better understanding of drug delivery to human tumors is needed. Positron emission tomography (PET) is an imaging technique that can be used to monitor drug pharmacokinetics non-invasively in patients, based on radiolabeling these drugs with short-lived positron emitters. In this mini review, principles and potential applications of PET using radiolabeled anticancer drugs will be discussed with respect to personalized treatment planning in oncology. In particular, it will be discussed how these radiolabeled anticancer drugs could help to develop strategies for improved drug delivery to solid tumors. The development and clinical implementation of PET using radiolabeled anticancer drugs will be illustrated by validation studies of carbon-11 labeled docetaxel ([(11)C]docetaxel) in lung cancer patients.

Pharmacoethnicity of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia: integrated analysis of published phase II and III trials

BACKGROUND

Ethnic differences in drug susceptibility and toxicity are a major concern, not only in drug development but also in the clinical setting. We review the toxicity profiles of docetaxel according to dose and ethnicity.

METHODS

We analyzed phase II and III clinical trials that included a once-every-3-weeks single-agent docetaxel arm. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the significant variables affecting the reported incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified studies conducted in Asia [odds ratio (OR) 19.0; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.64-99.0] and docetaxel dose (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03-1.13) as independent variables for the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant difference in the incidence of docetaxel-induced severe neutropenia between Asian and non-Asian clinical studies. Physicians and pharmacists should consider ethnic diversity in docetaxel toxicity when interpreting the results of clinical trials.

Absolute quantification of [(11)C]docetaxel kinetics in lung cancer patients using positron emission tomography

PURPOSE

Tumor resistance to docetaxel may be associated with reduced drug concentrations in tumor tissue. Positron emission tomography (PET) allows for quantification of radiolabeled docetaxel ([(11)C]docetaxel) kinetics and might be useful for predicting response to therapy. The primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of quantitative [(11)C]docetaxel PET scans in lung cancer patients. The secondary objective was to investigate whether [(11)C]docetaxel kinetics were associated with tumor perfusion, tumor size, and dexamethasone administration.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Thirty-four lung cancer patients underwent dynamic PET-computed tomography (CT) scans using [(11)C]docetaxel. Blood flow was measured using oxygen-15 labeled water. The first 24 patients were premedicated with dexamethasone. For quantification of [(11)C]docetaxel kinetics, the optimal tracer kinetic model was developed and a noninvasive procedure was validated.

RESULTS

Reproducible quantification of [(11)C]docetaxel kinetics in tumors was possible using a noninvasive approach (image derived input function). Thirty-two lesions (size ≥4 cm(3)) were identified, having a variable net influx rate of [(11)C]docetaxel (range, 0.0023-0.0229 mL·cm(-3)·min(-1)). [(11)C]docetaxel uptake was highly related to tumor perfusion (Spearman's ρ = 0.815;P < 0.001), but not to tumor size (Spearman's ρ = -0.140; P = 0.446). Patients pretreated with dexamethasone showed lower [(11)C]docetaxel uptake in tumors (P = 0.013). Finally, in a subgroup of patients who subsequently received docetaxel therapy, relative high [(11)C]docetaxel uptake was related with improved tumor response.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of [(11)C]docetaxel kinetics in lung cancer was feasible in a clinical setting. Variable [(11)C]docetaxel kinetics in tumors may reflect differential sensitivity to docetaxel therapy. Our findings warrant further studies investigating the predictive value of [(11)C]docetaxel uptake and the effects of comedication on [(11)C]docetaxel kinetics in tumors.

A phase II study of higher dose docetaxel in androgen-independent prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of single agent docetaxel at a higher dose than previously evaluated in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with metastatic and progressive AIPC were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m on day 1 of a 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with overt and rapid symptomatic deterioration from AIPC were entered into this study. Nine men achieved a reduction in PSA of >50% and 4 >80% for an overall PSA response of 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31-73%). Sixty percent of men experienced pain relief. Of 16 subjects with measurable disease, 25% achieved partial response (95% CI, 0-48 months), 44% stable disease, and 31% progressed. Median time to progression was 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.9-6.1 month) and median survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 5.7-12.9 months). Toxicity was significant and included grade 3 or greater neutropenia (76%), dehydration (16%), thrombosis (8%), confusion (4%), and death (4%).

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel is an active agent against AIPC and should be used judiciously. The side effect profile of the 100 mg/m dose was significant and cannot be recommended for everyday clinical practice.

Docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Based on the survival benefit demonstrated in large randomized clinical trials, docetaxel is approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in both the first- and second-line settings. The efficacy of docetaxel in combination with cisplatin is equivalent to some, and superior to other, platinum-based doublets for first-line management of NSCLC, and has a manageable toxicity profile. Carboplatin-based regimens and nonplatinum combinations with docetaxel also have proven efficacy in first-line therapy of patients with advanced NSCLC. Combinations of docetaxel with various novel targeted agents have produced encouraging data in Phase II studies. This article reviews recent studies of docetaxel as a single agent and in combination regimens with cytotoxic and more recent targeted agents in the management of advanced NSCLC.

Taxanes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The emergence of novel chemotherapeutic agents with promising anticancer activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during the 1990s has led to an expanded role for chemotherapy in the management of this disease. The taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) are novel microtubule stabilising agents, and have become an integral part of several commonly-used chemotherapy regimens in NSCLC. Taxanes inhibit the growth of lung cancer cell lines, exhibit synergistic interaction with other chemotherapy agents and enhance the efficacy of radiation in vitro. When used in low doses (metronomic dosing), they have important antiangiogenic properties. Several Phase II and III clinical trials have established the efficacy of the taxanes, as single agents and when used in combination with a platinum compound, in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. The use of a taxane in combination with a platinum compound has become an acceptable standard for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In addition to its efficacy in the first-line therapy of NSCLC, docetaxel is also the FDA-approved second-line agent for recurrent or relapsed NSCLC in the US. Several ongoing trials are comparing the efficacy of combining molecularly targeted agents with taxane-based regimens for the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Therapy for stage IIIB and stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

The treatment options for unresectable stage III NSCLC include definitive RT, chemotherapy, combined chemoradiotherapy, or supportive care. Compared with radiation alone or chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and standard RT confers a modest survival benefit at the cost of increased toxicity for patients with an excellent performance status. For metastatic disease, combination chemotherapy--in particular, platinum-based regimens--improves symptom control and survival. Newer chemotherapeutic agents with higher response rates and favorable toxicity profiles are improving outcome even for the elderly and debilitated patients and those refractory to first-line chemotherapy. Evolving understanding of the molecular events in tumorigenesis is uncovering a host of promising targets for mechanism-based therapy. Many of these novel target modulators likely will require combination with conventional chemotherapy for optimal results.

Docetaxel: a review of its use in non-small cell lung cancer

Docetaxel, a semisynthetic member of the taxoid class of antineoplastic agents, is effective in the treatment of patients with locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In noncomparative trials in patients with NSCLC, docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 20 to 38% and 14 to 25% as a first-line or second-line monotherapy, respectively. In Japan, docetaxel 60 mg/m2 produced objective response rates of 19 to 25% in previously untreated patients. Docetaxel 100 or 75 mg/m2 produced significantly higher response rates than either vinorelbine or ifosfamide in previously treated patients; patients treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 had an improved 1-year survival rate compared with those who received vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Docetaxel monotherapy in chemotherapy-naive patients produced survival rates that are similar to those reported for most platinum-containing standard combinations such as cisplatin plus vinorelbine. Combination of docetaxel with one other antineoplastic resulted in objective response rates of 20 to 54% in chemotherapy-naive patients; triple chemotherapy combinations produced responses in 51 and 60% of patients. Promising results from a few small studies and one large phase II study have also indicated a potential role for docetaxel as neoadjuvant therapy. The main dose-limiting adverse event associated with docetaxel is neutropenia, and fluid retention is common in many patients. The tolerability profile is generally acceptable in the majority of patients, although extra care has to be taken in patients with impaired liver function to minimise the risk of severe or febrile neutropenia. Conclusions. Docetaxel is generally well tolerated by patients receiving treatment for locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC, and produces response and survival rates equivalent to many current standard treatment options. Comparative studies have shown that docetaxel monotherapy provides significant survival benefits over best supportive care or treatment with vinorelbine or ifosfamide. Response and 1-year survival rates with docetaxel monotherapy are particularly encouraging in patients refractory or resistant to cisplatin or carboplatin, for whom treatment options are few. Neoadjuvant docetaxel has produced improved survival compared with local treatment alone. Combinations of docetaxel with other antineoplastic agents have produced relatively high response and 1-year survival rates; however, further comparative studies are required to confirm these benefits. In the meantime, docetaxel is a welcome addition to the options available for patients with advanced NSCLC.

Single-Agent Docetaxel (Taxotere®) in the Treatment of Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical Concepts and Commentary

Chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been shown to im-prove quality of life, and to provide a modest prolongation of survival. Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane that is an active agent for the treatment of NSCLC, both in previously untreated patients as well as those who have relapsed or progressed following cisplatin-based chemotherapy. After encouraging results in phase II studies, randomized trials have shown that treatment with single-agent docetaxel is superior to best supportive care for advanced NSCLC in both untreated and previously treated patients. This article will review the published data on the use of single-agent docetaxel in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.