p(21WAF1/CIP1) expression in breast cancers: associations with p53 and outcome

p53, p21, and cyclin d1 protein expression patterns in patients with breast cancer

Background and Aim:

The mutation in the wild-type tumor suppressor gene p53 is the most common genetic change in human tumors. In addition, the normal function of p21, which is both antiproliferative and an inhibitor of the cell cycle, is disrupted in some types of cancer. Meanwhile, cyclin D1 is a member of the cyclin protein family that is involved in regulating cell cycle progression. This study aimed to assess the expressions of the cell cycle inhibitory proteins p21, cyclin D1, and tumor suppressor gene p53, as well as their influence on the expressed histopathological changes in breast cancer tissues.

Materials and Methods:

Overall, 40 breast tissue specimens were investigated in this study, 30 of which were cancerous, while 10 were healthy tissues. p53, p21, and cyclin D1 expression patterns were detected using an immunohistochemistry (IHC) system.

Results:

The IHC reactions for p53 were positively observed in 27/30 (90%) cancerous tissues, compared with 2/10 (20%) normal breast tissues. For p21, reactions were observed in 28/30 (93.33%) cancerous tissues and 3/10 (30%) control tissues. For cyclin D1, reactions were observed in 25/30 (83.33%) cancerous tissues and 1/10 (10%) control tissues. The differences between the breast cancer tissues and the control tissues were statistically highly significant (p<0.01).

Conclusion:

The high expression rates of p21, cyclin D1, and p53 in malignant breast cancer cells with little or no regulatory role might imply mutational events in these proteins operating in concert with a variety of other genetic mutations in these tissues, which may play a molecular role in the development and/or progression of breast carcinogenesis.

Protective role of cytoplasmic p21Cip1/Waf1 in apoptosis of CDK4/6 inhibitor-induced senescence in breast cancer cells

Inhibition of CDK4/6 slows the cell cycle and induces senescence in breast cancer cells. However, senescent cancer cells promote invasion and metastasis. Several drugs reportedly target senescent cells, including ABT‐263 (navitoclax). We examined the effects of the CDK4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib and ABT‐263 on two human breast cancer cell lines. The abemaciclib and ABT‐263 combination additively decreased the viability of MDA‐MB‐231 cells, but not MCF‐7 cells. Also, the combination therapy‐induced caspase‐dependent apoptosis in MDA‐MB‐231 cells. Combination therapy with abemaciclib and ABT‐737, an ABT‐263 analog, significantly suppressed the in vivo growth of MDA‐MB‐231 with transient body‐weight loss. Given that p16^Ink4a and p21^Cip1/Waf1 are key factors in senescence and that both cell lines were negative for p16, the role of p21 in apoptosis of treated breast cancer cells was investigated. Although abemaciclib increased the cytoplasmic p21 level in both cell lines as a hallmark of senescence, the abemaciclib and ABT‐263 combination decreased it only in MDA‐MB‐231 cells. This decrease of p21 expression was relieved by caspase inhibition, and p21 was colocalized with caspase‐3 in the cytoplasm of MDA‐MB‐231 cells. Alternatively, small interfering RNA‐mediated knockdown of p21 rendered caspase‐3‐negative MCF‐7 cells susceptible to abemaciclib and ABT‐263, as well as TNF‐related apoptosis‐inducing ligand. Furthermore, a clinical database analysis showed that p21^high breast cancer patients had a poorer prognosis compared to p21^low patients. These results suggest that cytoplasmic p21 plays a protective role in apoptosis of CDK4/6 inhibitor‐induced senescent breast cancer cells.

Pattern of nucleotide variants of TP53 and their correlation with the expression of p53 and its downstream proteins in a Sri Lankan cohort of breast and colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) is known to be the most common malignancy in females whereas colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence also higher in both genders in Sri Lanka. TP53 is an important tumour suppressor gene and its somatic mutations are reported in approximately 27% of BC and 43% of CRC cases. Analysis of TP53 gene variants not only provides clues for the aetiology of the tumour formation, but also has an impact on treatment efficacy. The current study was conducted to investigate the pattern of TP53 variants in patients with BC and CRC from Sri Lanka.

METHODS

30 patients with BC, 21 patients with CRC and an equal number of healthy controls were screened for mutational status of TP53 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by direct sequencing. In addition, a subset of these samples were analysed for the protein expression of p53 and comparison made with the mutational status of TP53. We also analysed the protein expression of p21 and MDM2 as potential indicators of p53 functional status and compared it with the protein expression of p53. Additionally, hotspot codons of the KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes were also analysed in a subset of CRC patients.

RESULTS

Twenty seven sequence variants, including several novel variants in the TP53 gene were found. Nine BC and seven CRC tumour samples carried pathogenic TP53 variants. Pathogenic point missense variants were associated with strong and diffuse positive staining for p53 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), whereas, wild type TP53 showed complete absence of positive IHC staining or rare positive cells, regardless of the type of cancer. There was no direct correlation between p21 or MDM2 expression and p53 expression in either BCs or CRCs. Four of the CRC patients had pathogenic hotspot variants in KRAS; three of them were on codon 12 and one was on codon 61.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of pathogenic somatic TP53 variants was 31 and 33.33% in the studied BC and CRC cohorts respectively. All of them were located in exons 5-8 and the pathogenic missense variants were associated with strong immuno-positive staining for p53.

Relation between Ki-67, ER, PR, Her2/neu, p21, EGFR, and TOP II-α expression in invasive ductal breast cancer patients and correlations with prognosis

The aim of the present study was to investigate the expression of the transcription factor Ki-67, ER, PR, Her2/neu, p21, EGFR, and TOP II-α in the tumor tissue of patients with invasive ductal carcinoma(IDC); in addition, we examined correlations between these markers. Two hundred and sixteen IDC patients, who were not previously been treated with chemo- or radiotherapy, were included in the study. All tumors were grade I-III. Expression of molecular markers was determined by immunohistochemical analysis on paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Follow-up data were collected for 3 months to 10 years and analyzed for tumor recurrence, survival time, and prognostic risk factors. We determined Ki-67 expression correlates with the expression of ER, PR, HER-2, EGFR, and TOP-α, as well as lymph node involvement, high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, high tumor stage, and high TNM stage in IDC. Positive Ki-67 expression was a risk factor for rapid tumor recurrence and may help tumor progression, leading to poor prognosis in IDC. Ki-67 was directly correlated with EGFR, TOP II-α, lymph node involvement, high tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, high tumor stage, and high TNM stage in the hormone receptor subtypes of breast cancer. In triple negative breast cancer, Ki-67 correlated with TOP II-α. Expression of Ki-67 correlated with that of ER, PR, HER-2, EGFR, TOP II-α, and p21. In addition, the biomarker Ki-67 has a role as a prognostic factor and indicates a poor prognosis in IDC.

Increased phosphorylation of Akt in triple-negative breast cancers

Cells from breast cancers lacking hormone receptors (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PgR]) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 strongly express the cell proliferation marker Ki-67. However, the mechanisms of and stimulus signals involved in cell proliferation of this type of breast cancer are not well understood. The aim of the present study was to examine the characteristics of signal transduction in triple-negative (ER-, PgR-, and HER2-negative) breast cancers. For 44 tumor samples, western blotting analysis was conducted to examine the phosphorylation of HER2, external signal-regulated kinase (ERK)1 and -2 and Akt, and the immunohistochemical phenotypes of the samples with respect to ER and HER2 were also assessed. Phosphorylation of HER2 was detected in 4 of 15 immunohistochemically HER2-positive tumor samples (26.7%). ERK1/2 was more highly phosphorylated in triple-negative breast cancers. Phosphorylation of Akt kinase was significantly higher in triple-negative breast cancers. Triple-negative breast cancers are characterized by increased phosphorylation of Akt kinase. In the present study, we found for the first time that there is a population with a significantly activated Akt pathway in this type of breast cancer.

Measuring proliferation in breast cancer: practicalities and applications

Various methods are available for the measurement of proliferation rates in tumours, including mitotic counts, estimation of the fraction of cells in S-phase of the cell cycle and immunohistochemistry of proliferation-associated antigens. The evidence, advantages and disadvantages for each of these methods along with other novel approaches is reviewed in relation to breast cancer. The potential clinical applications of proliferative indices are discussed, including their use as prognostic indicators and predictors of response to systemic therapy.

Expression of p21WAF in salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma and its relation to histologic grade

The biologic behavior and factors influencing the development of salivary gland mucoepidermoid carcinoma are not fully understood. Alteration of the cyclin-dependant kinase inhibitor p21(WAF) could cause uncontrolled proliferation leading to cancer. Thirty-five mucoepidermoid carcinomas were graded and immunohistochemically stained for p21(WAF). The percentage of positive tumor cells was determined using an eyepiece graticule and a computer-assisted image analyzer, which revealed 8.6% and 22.9% of the cases to be positive for p21(WAF), respectively. A statistically significant correlation was not observed between p21(WAF) and grading. Considering the absence of p21(WAF) expression in most mucoepidermoid carcinomas, it appears that the inhibitory effect of p21(WAF) on cell growth is removed in most cases. Given the lack of correlation with tumor grade, it is possible that the impact of p21(WAF) is in the earlier stages of tumorigenesis. A p53-independent pathway of p21(WAF) induction may exist for the small proportion of tumors that showed positivity.

Lymph node status as a guide to selection of available prognostic markers in breast cancer: the clinical practice of the future?

Prognosticators evaluating survival in breast cancer vary in significance in respect to lymph node status. Studies have shown e.g. that HER2/neu immunohistochemistry or HER2/neu gene amplification analysis do perform well as prognosticators in lymph node positive (LN +) patients but are less valuable in lymph node negative (LN -) patients. We collected data from different studies and tried to evaluate the relative significance of different prognosticators in LN+/LN- patient groups. In LN+ patients HER2/neu and E-cadherin immunohistochemistry were the statistically most significant prognosticators followed by proliferation associated features (mitotic counts by SMI (standardised mitotic index) or MAI (mitotic activity index), or S-phase fraction). Bcl-2 immunohistochemistry was also significant but p53 and cystatin A had no significance as prognosticators. In LN- patients proliferation associated prognosticators (SMI, MAI, Ki-67 index, PCNA immunohistochemistry, S-phase fraction) are especially valuable and also Cathepsin D, cystatin A, and p53 are significant, but HER2/neu or bcl-2, or E-cadherin less significant or without significance. We find that in studies evaluating single prognosticators one should distinguish between prognosticators suitable for LN+ and LN- patients. This will allow the choice of best prognosticators in evaluating the prospects of the patient. The distinction between LN+ and LN- patients in this respect may also be of special value in therapeutic decisions.

Cell Proliferation in Breast Cancer is a Major Determinant of Clinical Outcome in Node-Positive but Not in Node-Negative Patients

The growth rate of a tumor cell population depends on two major factors: the percentage of proliferating cells (cell growth fraction) and the rapidity of their duplication (cell proliferation rate). The authors evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of both kinetics parameters in a large series of breast cancer patients (n=504). The cell growth fraction was determined by MIB-1 immunostaining, the cell proliferation rate by AgNOR analysis. Ki-67 LI (labeling index) and AgNOR area were significantly associated with histotype, histologic grade, tumor size, estrogen/progesterone receptor status, patient age, and lymph node involvement (P<0.005). In the entire series of patients, both kinetics variables were significantly and independently associated with the clinical outcome, but their prognostic relevance was quite different when node-negative and node-positive patients were considered separately. Although in node-positive patients Ki-67 LI and AgNOR area were the unique independent predictors of disease-free and overall survival, they were excluded by the multivariate Cox model in node-negative patients, where only tumor size and estrogen receptor status retained a significant P-value. These results show that in breast carcinoma the cell growth fraction and the cell proliferation rate have a different prognostic impact with respect to the lymph node status and are major determinants of clinical outcome in node-positive patients only. Within this subgroup, the rapidity of cell proliferation as assessed by AgNOR analysis also served as a sensitive predictor of the response to adjuvant treatments.

Cell cycle related proteins in hyperplasia of usual type in breast specimens of patients with and without breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Hyperplasia of usual type (HUT) is a common proliferative lesion associated with a slight elevated risk for subsequent development of breast cancer. Cell cycle-related proteins would be helpful to determine the putative role of these markers in the process of mammary carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to analyze the expression of cell cycle related proteins in HUT of breast specimens of patients with and without breast cancer, and compare this expression with areas of invasive carcinomas.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical evaluation was performed using antibodies against cell cycle related proteins ER, PR, p53, p21, p63, and Ki-67 in hyperplasia of usual type (HUT) in specimens of aesthetic reduction mammaplasty (ARM), in specimens of mammaplasty contralateral to breast cancer (MCC), and in specimens of invasive mammary carcinomas (IMC) presenting HUT in the adjacent parenchyma. The results showed that the immunoexpression of ER, PR, p21, p53, p63, and KI-67 was similar in HUT from the three different groups. The p63 expression in myoepithelial cells showed discontinuous pattern in the majority of HUT, different from continuous expression in normal lobules. Nuclear expression of p53 and p21 was frequently higher expressed in IMC and very rare in HUT. We also found cytoplasmic expression of p21 in benign hyperplastic lesions and in neoplastic cells of IMC.

CONCLUSION

Our data failed to demonstrate different expression of cell cycle related proteins in HUT from patients with and without breast cancer. However, we found discontinuous expression of p63 in myoepithelial cells around HUT adjacent to carcinomas and cytoplasmic expression of p21 in epithelial cells of hyperplastic foci. Further studies are needed to determine how these subgroups relate to molecular abnormalities and cancer risk.

Proliferative markers as prognostic and predictive tools in early breast cancer: where are we now?

In the last few decades, proliferative markers have been broadly evaluated as prognostic and predictive factors for early stage breast cancer patients. Several papers evaluating one or more markers have been published, often with contradictory results. As a consequence, there is still uncertainty about the role of these proliferative markers. The present paper critically reviews the current knowledge about the following markers: thymidine labeling index, S phase fraction/flow cytometry, Ki 67, thymidine kinase (TK), cyclins E, cyclin D, the cyclin inhibitors p27 and p21, and topoisomerase IIalpha. For each marker, the prognostic and predictive role was separately analyzed. Only papers published in English in peer-reviewed journals before June 2004 that include at least 100 evaluable patients were selected. In addition, the prognostic and predictive role of the proliferative markers had to be assessed through multivariate analyses. One hundred and thirty-two papers fulfilled these criteria and 159 516 patients were analyzed. Unfortunately, several methodological problems in the research to date prevent us from including any one of these proliferative markers among the standard prognostic and predictive factors. Early incorporation of translational research and new technologies with clinical trials are needed to prospectively validate biological markers and allow their use in clinical practice.

A molecular 'signature' of primary breast cancer cultures; patterns resembling tumor tissue

Background

To identify the spectrum of malignant attributes maintained outside the host environment, we have compared global gene expression in primary breast tumors and matched short-term epithelial cultures.

Results

In contrast to immortal cell lines, a characteristic 'limited proliferation' phenotype was observed, which included over expressed genes associated with the TGFβ signal transduction pathway, such as SPARC, LOXL1, RUNX1, and DAPK1. Underlying this profile was the conspicuous absence of hTERT expression and telomerase activity, a significant increase in TβRII, its cognate ligand, and the CDK inhibitor, p21^CIP1/WAF1. Concurrently, tumor tissue and primary cultures displayed low transcript levels of proliferation-related genes, such as, TOP2A, ANKT, RAD51, UBE2C, CENPA, RRM2, and PLK.

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that commonly used immortal cell lines do not reflect some aspects of tumor biology as closely as primary tumor cell cultures. The gene expression profile of malignant tissue, which is uniquely retained by cells cultured on solid substrates, could facilitate the development and testing of novel molecular targets for breast cancer.

Biomolecular prognostic factors in breast cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To update clinicians on recent findings concerning the clinical usefulness of biomarkers in breast cancer, this review examines recently published papers dealing with promising prognostic/predictive biological factors. These factors can be classified according to their involvement in the main alterations characterizing tumor cells: self-sufficiency in growth signals, insensitivity to anti-growth signals, evasion of apoptosis, limitless replicative potential, sustained angiogenesis, and tissue invasion and metastasis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite relevant research efforts and the identification of many putative good prognosticators, few of these factors are proving clinically useful for identifying patients at minimal risk of relapse, patients with a worse prognosis, or patients likely to benefit from specific treatments. Most of them, such as HER-2/neu, epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin E, p53, bcl-2, vascular endothelial growth factor, urokinase-type plasminogen activator-1 and the recently discovered anti-apoptosis protein survivin, are suggested for possible inclusion in the category of biomarkers with a high level of clinico-laboratory effectiveness. However, no single biomarker was able to identify those patients with the best (or worst) prognosis or those which would be responsive to a given therapy. Novel findings derived from gene-expression analysis indicate that the simultaneous consideration of molecular alterations contributing to the hallmarks of cancer might provide clinically useful prognostic, and perhaps therapeutic, information.

SUMMARY

Rapid translation of laboratory findings to clinical practice was hampered by many difficulties, including technical and statistical concerns, a lack of assay standardization and comparability, and the modest design of translational studies. Many studies are performed on too small series of patients to provide reliable results; the studies are often heterogeneous in terms of treatment, patients and tumor characteristics, and data may be evaluated using different analytical approaches and are thus not easily comparable. Adequately planned prospective studies are required to assess the clinical utility of biomarker determinations.

A distinct phenotype characterizes tumors from a putative genetic trait involving chondrosarcoma and breast cancer occurring in the same patient

Recently, we documented an increased risk for the occurrence of breast- and cartilaginous tumors in the same patient, statistically pointing towards a potential genetic trait. This trait is most probably not associated with mutations in the two major hereditary breast cancer genes since no cases of enchondroma or chondrosarcoma were found in Dutch BRCA1 and BRCA2 families. We were able to collect and review the tumor tissue samples from 34 patients with both breast- and cartilaginous tumors and compared histopathological and immunohistochemical features of these tumors with controls. Breast cancer controls were available from literature data generated to compare familial breast cancers with nonselected cases. Clinical markers for chondrosarcoma controls were collected from the Netherlands Committee of Bone Tumors. Immunohistochemical data on chondro-tumor controls were available from our own files. Breast tumors of patients with cartilaginous sarcomas showed a significantly higher mitotic count (P=0.001), contained less lymphocyte infiltrate (P=0.025) and less nuclear pleomorphism. Remarkably, all cartilaginous tumors are of one common histological category originating centrally (P=0.014). Estrogen receptor and p53 expression were significantly higher (P<0.001) in breast cancer associated with chondro-tumors. p21 staining was more often negative in chondro-tumors associated with breast cancer. In seven cases of breast cancer, we found a slight decrease in CHEK2 expression. However, we could not identify the CHEK2 1100delC mutation in these cases nor in cases with normal CHEK2 expression. Hierarchical cluster analysis of all parameters within chondro-tumor-associated breast cancer specimens revealed two different subgroups, the largest one associated with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, which may distinguish sporadic cases from those belonging to the potential genetic trait. These distinct phenotypic findings support the existence of a new hitherto unrecognized syndrome, characterized by an increased risk to develop both breast cancer and centrally originating cartilaginous tumors.

ErbB2 overexpression in human breast carcinoma is correlated with p21Cip1 up-regulation and tyrosine-15 hyperphosphorylation of p34Cdc2: poor responsiveness to chemotherapy with cyclophoshamide methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil is associated with Erb2 overexpression and with p21Cip1 overexpression

BACKGROUND

Clinical investigations have shown that in patients with breast carcinoma, tumors that overexpress the erb-B2 gene are less responsive to certain chemotherapy regimens compared with tumors that express low levels of ErbB2, suggesting that ErbB2 overexpression may be used as a marker for poor response to chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma. The combination of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) is one of the most widely used chemotherapy regimens in patients with breast carcinoma. Patients who have ErbB2-overexpressing breast carcinomas have poorer responses to CMF compared with patients who have breast carcinomas with low ErbB2 expression. ErbB2-overexpressing breast tumor cells are resistant to taxol-induced apoptotic cell death. The underlying molecular mechanism is that ErbB2 inhibits p34(Cdc2) activation, which is required for taxol-induced apoptosis, by up-regulating p21(Cip1) and by hyperphosphorylating p34(Cdc2) on tyrosine-15. However, the relation between ErbB2, p21(Cip1), and p34(Cdc2) in patients with breast carcinoma remains elusive. The contribution of these molecular alterations to ErbB2-mediated CMF resistance has not been examined.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, 5 microm thick tissue sections from 107 patients with invasive breast carcinoma were immunostained using specific antibodies against ErbB2, p21(Cip1), and phosphorylated tyrosine (Tyr)-15 of p34(Cdc2). Ninety-four of 107 patients were treated with the CMF regimen. In situ hybridization of p21(Cip1)mRNA also was performed in 20 of the sections described above. ErbB2 expression levels, p21(Cip1) expression levels, and phosphorylation status on Tyr15 of p34(Cdc2) were analyzed for correlations with clinicopathologic parameters for the 107 patients and for correlations with disease-free survival (DFS) in the 94 patients who were treated with the CMF regimen.

RESULTS

Among 94 patients with breast carcinoma who were treated with CMF, it was found that ErbB2 overexpression was associated significantly with poor DFS (P < 0.01). Patients who had higher p21(Cip1) expression had worse DFS compared with patients who had low p21(Cip1) expression (P = 0.02). However, no significant correlation was found between p34(Cdc2)-Tyr15 phosphorylation and DFS (P > 0.05). It is noteworthy that p21(Cip1) expression and p34(Cdc2)-Tyr15 phosphorylation were correlated significantly and positively with ErbB2 expression (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests that p21(Cip1) expression, but not p34(Cdc2)-Tyr15 phosphorylation, may play a role in ErbB2-mediated CMF resistance, which may contribute to the poor survival of patients with ErbB2-overexpressing breast carcinomas who were treated on the CMF regimen. In addition, ErbB2 overexpression was correlated with p21(Cip1) up-regulation and with increased p34(Cdc2)-Tyr15 phosphorylation in breast tumors.

Exploiting the hallmarks of cancer: the future conquest of breast cancer

What separates a malignant from a normal cell? This question has occupied scientists for decades. Although a simple answer remains elusive, several hallmarks of malignancy have been identified. These critical features include uncontrolled proliferation, insensitivity to negative growth regulation, evasion of apoptosis, lack of senescence, invasion and metastasis, angiogenesis and genomic elasticity. Existing therapies predominantly target proliferation either with cytotoxic agents, ionising radiation or more targeted attacks on growth factor signalling pathways. Our most successful therapies to date inhibit proliferation via the oestrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 pathways. Further improvements in therapy must attack the other hallmarks of malignancy and will undoubtedly be accompanied by a better means of individual patient selection for such therapies. Indeed, each of these hallmarks presents a therapeutic opportunity. To believe otherwise would be to assume that a feature is both biologically crucial, yet therapeutically unimportant, an unlikely paradox. Here, we suggest the hallmarks of malignancy as a conceptual framework for understanding novel breast cancer therapies.

Expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in breast carcinomas before and after preoperative chemotherapy

Molecular markers predicting response to preoperative chemotherapy would be of major clinical relevance in breast cancer. Therefore, we studied the relationship between the expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins and clinical outcome in breast cancer patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy. Expression of p2lWaf1, p27KiP1, p53, cyclin D3 and Ki-67 was determined in breast carcinomas by means of immunohistochemistry both prior and after preoperative chemotherapy. Expression data were compared with both clinical parameters and response to preoperative chemotherapy with either cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/5-fluorouracil (CMF, n = 29) or epirubicin/docetaxel (ED, n = 36). In paired samples before and after preoperative chemotherapy, the percentage of p21Waf1, p27Kip1, p53 and cyclin D3 positive nuclei of tumor cells in postchemotherapy specimens was significantly higher than the percentage in prechemotherapy samples but no change in Ki-67 expression was observed. High Ki-67 expression (p = 0.02), negative estrogen receptor status (p = 0.01) and negative progesterone receptor status (p = 0.04) were associated with complete pathologic response to chemotherapy, whereas the other markers did not predict response. In conclusion, expression levels of p21Waf1, p27Kip1, p53 and cyclin D3 significantly increased after preoperative chemotherapy in breast carcinomas but only high Ki-67 expression, negative estrogen receptor status and negative progesterone receptor status were associated with complete pathologic response to preoperative chemotherapy.

p21WAF1 expression in invasive breast cancer and its association with p53, AP-2, cell proliferation, and prognosis

AIMS

To evaluate the expression and prognostic relevance of p21(WAF1) in breast cancer and to investigate its association with p53, activator protein 2 (AP-2), and cell proliferation (as assessed by Ki-67 expression).

METHODS

p21(WAF1) expression was analysed immunohistochemically in a large prospective, consecutive series of 420 patients with breast cancer diagnosed and treated between 1990 and 1995 at Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland. Inter-relations between p21(WAF1) expression and p53, AP-2, and Ki-67 were evaluated. The expression of p21(WAF1) was also compared with clinicopathological parameters and the patients' survival.

RESULTS

In general, nuclear p21(WAF1) expression was low in carcinomas (median, 2.5%; range, 0-70%). Expression was lowest in lobular carcinomas (chi(2) = 7.4; p = 0.025). p21(WAF1) positive tumours were more often p53 positive (chi(2) = 4.2; p = 0.041) but expression of p21(WAF1) did not correlate with AP-2 expression or Ki-67 in the whole patient group. In addition, the combined expression of p21 and p53 was not associated with AP-2 expression. High nuclear p21(WAF1) positivity (n = 160; 38%) was associated with poor differentiation (chi(2) = 8.1; p = 0.017). In the univariate analyses, p21(WAF1) expression had no prognostic value for predicting breast cancer related survival (BCRS) or recurrence free survival (RFS) in the whole patient group or in the subgroups investigated. However, in postmenopausal patients with lymph node metastases, and oestrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive tumours, high p21(WAF1) expression predicted response to adjuvant hormonal treatment with antioestrogens. In the univariate analysis, the significant factors for predicting BCRS were Ki-67 expression, stage, lymph node status, histological grade, ER and PR status, and those for RFS were Ki-67 expression, stage, and lymph node status. In the multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of shorter BCRS were high cell proliferation activity measured by Ki-67 expression (p < 0.001), advanced stage (p < 0.001), and poor differentiation (p = 0.048). Shorter RFS was independently predicted by high cell proliferative activity (p < 0.001) and advanced stage (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The regulation of p21(WAF1) seems to occur independently of p53 or AP-2 and analysing p21(WAF1) expression provided no prognostic information for patients with breast cancer.

Age-associated biomarker profiles of human breast cancer

To explore the hypothesis that aging not only increases breast cancer incidence but also alters breast cancer biology, we correlated patient age and diagnosis with tumor histology, stage and biomarkers independently determined from two different tumor archives: an American collection of approximately 800 paraffin-embedded and immunohistochemically analyzed primary breast cancers, and an European collection of approximately 3000 cryobanked primary breast cancers analyzed by ligand-binding and enzyme immunoassay (EIA). The prognostic biomarkers chosen for comparison represented surrogate measures of tumor: (i). proliferation, growth and genetic instability (mitotic and apoptotic indices, Ki-67/MIB-1-positivity, nuclear grade, p53-positivity), (ii). endocrine-dependence (estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptors (PR), pS2, Bcl2), (iii). growth factor receptor-dependence (ErbB2, EGFR/ErbB1), and (iv). angiogenic, invasive and proteolytic potential (uPA, PAI-1, Cathepsin D, VEGF). No biomarker reflecting tumor angiogenic, invasive or proteolytic potential showed a significant correlation with patient age at diagnosis. In contrast, significant inverse correlations (|r|>0.1; P< or =0.05) were observed for all measures of tumor growth and genetic instability as well as growth factor receptor overexpression (ErbB2 or EGFR positivity). Only one marker of endocrine-dependence, ER expression, showed a significant positive correlation with patient age at diagnosis. In summary, these findings support the hypothesis that breast cancer biology is significantly affected by patient age. In particular, breast tumors arising in older patients have slower growth rates, are more likely to be ER-positive, and are less likely to be p53-positive, EGFR-positive or ErbB2-positive.

An immunohistochemical study of p21 and p53 expression in primary node-positive breast carcinoma

AIMS

p21, an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinase, is involved in the p53 pathway of growth control. Its expression has been linked to cellular differentiation. It has been implicated in p53-mediated growth arrest following DNA damage and in terminally differentiated cells. This study analysed p21 and p53 expression, in a series of node-positive patients with breast carcinoma and examined histopathological parameters of the tumour and the prognostic implications of p21 and p53 expression.

METHODS

One hundred and five consecutive patients with node-positive disease and at least 3 years follow-up were identified. Sections were stained for p53 and p21 using monoclonal antibodies. Results were expressed as percentage positive cells, and over 20% considered positive for p53 and over 10% considered for p21.

RESULTS

p21 was overexpressed (>10% of cells positive) in 65% of patients and p53 was overexpressed (>20% of cells positive in 68%. The mean (SEM) level of p21 staining was 5.7(0.8)% and was 54.9(4.0)% for p53. There was no correlation between p21 and p53 expression (r=0.071 P=0.5). There were no significant differences in demographic criteria between patients that were p21 positive or negative and p53 positive or negative. There were no significant differences in tumour type, grade or stage between the groups. p21 expression did not have prognostic significance; however, p53 positivity was associated with a worse prognosis, which remained when controlled for stage.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated p21 overexpression in 65% of patients with node-positive breast carcinoma. Levels did not correlate with p53 status and unlike p53 failed to have prognostic significance.