The integrated activities of IRF-2 (HiNF-M), CDP/cut (HiNF-D) and H4TF-2 (HiNF-P) regulate transcription of a cell cycle controlled human histone H4 gene: mechanistic differences between distinct H4 genes

Roles of IRF4 in various immune cells in systemic lupus erythematosus

Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) is a member of IRF family of transcription factors which mainly regulates the transcription of IFN. IRF4 is restrictively expressed in immune cells such as T and B cells, macrophages, as well as DC. It is essential for the development and function of these cells. Since these cells take part in the homeostasis of the immune system and dysfunction of them contributes to the initiation and progress of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), the roles of IRF4 in the SLE development becomes an important topic. Here we systemically discuss the biological characteristics of IRF4 in various immune cells and analyze the pathologic effects of IRF4 alteration in SLE and the potential targeting therapeutics of SLE.

Functional coupling of transcription factor HiNF-P and histone H4 gene expression during pre- and post-natal mouse development

Transcription factor Histone Nuclear Factor P (HiNF-P; gene symbol Hinfp) mediates cell cycle control of histone H4 gene expression to support the packaging of newly replicated DNA as chromatin. The HiNF-P/p220(NPAT) complex controls multiple H4 genes in established human cell lines and is critical for cell proliferation. The mouse Hinfp(LacZ) null allele causes early embryonic lethality due to a blastocyst defect. However, neither Hinfp function nor its temporal expression relative to histone H4 genes during fetal development has been explored. Here, we establish that expression of Hinfp is biologically coupled with expression of twelve functional mouse H4 genes during pre- and post-natal tissue-development. Both Hinfp and H4 genes are robustly expressed at multiple embryonic (E) days (from E5.5 to E15.5), coincident with ubiquitous LacZ staining driven by the Hinfp promoter. Five highly expressed mouse H4 genes (Hist1h4d, Histh4f, Hist1h4m and Hist2h4) account for >90% of total histone H4 mRNA throughout development. Post-natal expression of H4 genes in mice is most evident in lung, spleen, thymus and intestine, and with few exceptions (e.g., adult liver) correlates with Hinfp gene expression. Histone H4 gene expression decreases butHinfp levels remain constitutive upon cell growth inhibition in culture. The in vivo co-expression of Hinfp and histone H4 genes is consistent with the biological function of Hinfp as a principal transcriptional regulator of histone H4 gene expression during mouse development.

Transcriptional activation of histone H4 by C/EBPβ during the mitotic clonal expansion of 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation

Histone H4 is activated by C/EBPβ in mitotic clonal expansion during adipogenesis. C/EBP-binding sites are identified in histone H4 promoters, and H4 expression is suppressed when C/EBPβ is knocked down or its DNA-binding activity is inhibited by A-C/EBP. These results help in our understanding of how C/EBPβ plays important roles in the proliferation of other cells.

CCAAT enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) is required for both mitotic clonal expansion (MCE) and terminal differentiation during the 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation program. Whereas the mechanism of C/EBPβ during terminal differentiation is well understood, the mechanism of C/EBPβ in MCE is not. We provide evidence that histone H4, the most conserved cell cycle–related histone, the change of which is strictly correlated with DNA content change during the cell cycle, is transcriptionally activated by C/EBPβ during MCE. Expression of histone H4 is increased at 16 h after induction when 3T3-L1 preadipocytes synchronously reenter S phase, which is correlated with the sequential phosphorylation and activation of C/EBPβ, and expression was partially suppressed when A-C/EBP (dominant negative for C/EBP protein) was overexpressed. One C/EBP-binding site was identified in one of the histone H4 gene promoters (hist4h4), confirmed by both electrophoretic mobility shift assay and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. C/EBP-binding sites were also found in 9 of 11 other histone H4 promoters, which can also be transactivated by C/EBPβ. Knockdown of C/EBPβ by stealth small interfering RNA partially decreased H4 gene expression and arrested cells in G1 phase as indicated by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of DNA content. This study provides new insights into why C/EBPβ is required for MCE during 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation and why C/EBPβ plays important roles in the proliferation of other cell types.

p110 CUX1 cooperates with E2F transcription factors in the transcriptional activation of cell cycle-regulated genes

The transcription factor p110 CUX1 was shown to stimulate cell proliferation by accelerating entry into S phase. As p110 CUX1 can function as a transcriptional repressor or activator depending on promoter context, we investigated its mechanism of transcriptional activation using the DNA polymerase alpha gene promoter as a model system. Linker-scanning analysis revealed that a low-affinity E2F binding site is required for transcriptional activation. Moreover, coexpression with a dominant-negative mutant of DP-1 suggested that endogenous E2F factors are indeed needed for p110-mediated activation. Tandem affinity purification, coimmunoprecipitation, chromatin immunoprecipitation, and reporter assays indicated that p110 CUX1 can engage in weak protein-protein interactions with E2F1 and E2F2, stimulate their recruitment to the DNA polymerase alpha gene promoter, and cooperate with these factors in transcriptional activation. On the other hand, in vitro assays suggested that the interaction between CUX1 and E2F1 either is not direct or is regulated by posttranslational modifications. Genome-wide location analysis revealed that targets common to p110 CUX1 and E2F1 included many genes involved in cell cycle, DNA replication, and DNA repair. Comparison of the degree of enrichment for various E2F factors suggested that binding of p110 CUX1 to a promoter will favor the specific recruitment of E2F1, and to a lesser extent E2F2, over E2F3 and E2F4. Reporter assays on a subset of common targets confirmed that p110 CUX1 and E2F1 cooperate in their transcriptional activation. Overall, our results show that p110 CUX1 and E2F1 cooperate in the regulation of many cell cycle genes.

Transcriptional activation of the histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P) gene by HiNF-P and its cyclin E/CDK2 responsive co-factor p220NPAT defines a novel autoregulatory loop at the G1/S phase transition

Histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P) activates histone H4 gene transcription at the G1/S phase transition upon association with its cyclin E/CDK2 responsive co-factor p220NPAT. Here we characterize the gene regulatory pathways that control the proliferation-related expression of HiNF-P. The HiNF-P locus contains a single TATA-less 0.6 kbp promoter with multiple phylogenetically conserved transcription factor recognition motifs. Transient reporter gene assays with HiNF-P promoter deletions show that there are at least three distinct activating regions (-387/-201, -201/-100 and -100/-1) that support maximal transcription. HiNF-P gene transcription is activated by SP1 through the -100/-1 domain and repressed by E2F1 through the -201/-100 domain. The multifunctional co-regulators CBP and p300 also stimulate HiNF-P gene transcription through the -201/-1 core promoter. Importantly, the HiNF-P promoter is activated by both HiNF-P and p220NPAT. This autoregulatory activation is further enhanced by cyclin E and CDK2, while blocked by CDK inhibition (i.e., p57KIP2 p27KIP1, p21CIP). Thus, the HiNF-P gene is a key non-histone target of p220NPAT and HiNF-P. The dependence of HiNF-P gene transcription on cyclin E/CDK2/p220NPAT signaling defines a novel feed-forward loop that may sustain HiNF-P expression in proliferating cells to support the cell cycle regulated synthesis of histone H4 proteins.

HiNF-P is a bifunctional regulator of cell cycle controlled histone H4 gene transcription

Cell cycle progression beyond the G1/S phase transition requires the activation of a transcription complex containing histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P) and nuclear protein mapped to ataxia telangiectasia (p220(NPAT)) in response to cyclin dependent kinase 2 (CDK2)/cyclin E signaling. We show here that the potent co-activating properties of HiNF-P/p220(NPAT) on the histone H4 gene promoter, which are evident in the majority of human cell types, are sporadically neutralized in distinct somatic cell lines. In cells where HiNF-P and p220(NPAT) do not activate the H4 gene promoter, HiNF-P instead represses transcription. Our data suggest that the cell type specific expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitory (CKI) protein p57(KIP2) inhibits the HiNF-P dependent activation of the histone H4 promoter. We propose that, analogous to E2F proteins and other cell cycle regulatory proteins, HiNF-P is a bifunctional transcriptional regulator that can activate or repress cell cycle controlled genes depending on the cellular context.

An architectural perspective of cell-cycle control at the G1/S phase cell-cycle transition

A prominent role for the execution of cell cycle and growth regulatory mechanisms within the three-dimensional context of nuclear architecture is becoming increasingly evident. Signaling pathways and regulatory networks that govern activation and suppression of genes controlling proliferation are functionally integrated for the organization and assembly of transcriptional machinery in nuclear microenvironments. The transcriptional activation of histone genes at the G1/S phase transition (S-point) is temporarily, functionally, and spatially distinct from transcriptional mechanisms at the restriction point (R-point). The spatial distinction in R-point versus S-point control is the localization of clustered histone gene loci at cajal bodies, which is modulated during the cell cycle. Histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P), the principal factor mediating H4 histone gene transcription, is the final link in the signaling cascade that is initiated with growth factor dependent induction of cyclin E/CDK2 kinase activity at the R-point and culminates in the NPAT-mediated activation of histone H4 genes through HiNF-P at the G1/S phase cell-cycle transition.

The p110 isoform of the CDP/Cux transcription factor accelerates entry into S phase

The CDP/Cux transcription factor was previously found to acquire distinct DNA binding and transcriptional properties following a proteolytic processing event that takes place at the G1/S transition of the cell cycle. In the present study, we have investigated the role of the CDP/Cux processed isoform, p110, in cell cycle progression. Populations of cells stably expressing p110 CDP/Cux displayed a faster division rate and reached higher saturation density than control cells carrying the empty vector. p110 CDP/Cux cells reached the next S phase faster than control cells under various experimental conditions: following cell synchronization in G0 by growth factor deprivation, synchronization in S phase by double thymidine block treatment, or enrichment in G2 by centrifugal elutriation. In each case, duration of the G1 phase was shortened by 2 to 4 h. Gene inactivation confirmed the role of CDP/Cux as an accelerator of cell cycle progression, since mouse embryo fibroblasts obtained from Cutl1z/z mutant mice displayed a longer G1 phase and proliferated more slowly than their wild-type counterparts. The delay to enter S phase persisted following immortalization by the 3T3 protocol and transformation with H-RasV12. Moreover, CDP/Cux inactivation hindered both the formation of foci on a monolayer and tumor growth in mice. At the molecular level, expression of both cyclin E2 and A2 was increased in the presence of p110 CDP/Cux and decreased in its absence. Overall, these results establish that p110 CDP/Cux functions as a cell cycle regulator that accelerates entry into S phase.

The cyclin E/Cdk2 substrate p220(NPAT) is required for S-phase entry, histone gene expression, and Cajal body maintenance in human somatic cells

Cyclin E/Cdk2, a central regulator of the G1/S transition, coordinates multiple cell cycle events, including DNA replication, centrosome duplication, and activation of the E2F transcriptional program. Recent studies suggest a role for cyclin E/Cdk2 in activation of histone transcription during S phase via the Cajal body-associated protein p220NPAT, and in addition, p220 can promote S-phase entry independently of histone transcriptional activation when overexpressed. Here we have examined the requirement for p220 in histone transcription, cell cycle progression, and Cajal body function through analysis of human somatic HCT116 cells engineered to contain a conditional p220 allele. p220 is required for proliferation of HCT116 cells, as assessed after expression of Cre recombinase in p220(flox/-) cells. This defect was due to an inability of these cells to transit from G0/G1 into S phase, and cell cycle arrest occurred in the presence of elevated Cdk2 kinase activity. Expression of human papillomavirus E7, but not E6, eliminated cell cycle arrest in response to p220 depletion. Optimal expression of all four core histone genes required p220, as did optimal transcription of a histone H4 promoter-luciferase construct. Basal histone H4 expression in G0/G1, although p220 dependent, occurs in the absence of detectable phosphorylation of p220 on Cdk2 sites. Cells lacking p220 displayed defects in the localization of the Cajal body component p80coilin as cells progressed from G0 to S phase in response to mitogenic signals. These finding indicate that p220 is an essential downstream component of the cyclin E/Cdk2 signaling pathway and functions to coordinate multiple elements of the G1/S transition.

Tumor suppressor pRB functions as a co-repressor of the CCAAT displacement protein (CDP/cut) to regulate cell cycle controlled histone H4 transcription

The CCAAT displacement protein (CDP-cut/CUTL1/cux) performs a key proliferation-related function as the DNA binding subunit of the cell cycle controlled HiNF-D complex. HiNF-D interacts with all five classes (H1, H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) of the cell-cycle dependent histone genes, which are transcriptionally and coordinately activated at the G(1)/S phase transition independent of E2F. The tumor suppressor pRB/p105 is an intrinsic component of the HiNF-D complex. However, the molecular interactions that enable CDP and pRB to form a complex and thus convey cell growth regulatory information onto histone gene promoters must be further defined. Using transient transfections, we show that CDP represses the H4 gene promoter and that pRB functions with CDP as a co-repressor. Direct physical interaction between CDP and pRB was observed in glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays. Furthermore, interactions between these proteins were established by yeast and mammalian two-hybrid experiments and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Confocal microscopy shows that subsets of each protein are co-localized in situ. Using a series of pRB mutants, we find that the CDP/pRB interaction, similar to the E2F/pRB interaction, utilizes the A/B large pocket (LP) of pRB. Thus, several converging lines of evidence indicate that complexes between CDP and pRB repress cell cycle regulated histone gene promoters.

The tumor suppressor interferon regulatory factor 1 interferes with SP1 activation to repress the human CDK2 promoter

Cell growth control by interferons (IFNs) involves up-regulation of the tumor suppressor interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1). To exert its anti-proliferative effects, this factor must ultimately control transcription of several key genes that regulate cell cycle progression. Here we show that the G1/S phase-related cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) gene is a novel proliferation-related downstream target of IRF1. We find that IRF1, but not IRF2, IRF3, or IRF7, selectively represses CDK2 gene transcription in a dose- and time-dependent manner. We delineate the IRF1-responsive repressor element between nt -68 to -31 of the CDK2 promoter. For comparison, the tumor suppressor p53 represses CDK2 promoter activity independently of IRF1 through sequences upstream of nt -68, and the CDP/cut/Cux1 homeodomain protein represses transcription down-stream of -31. Thus, IRF1 repression represents one of three distinct mechanisms to attenuate CDK2 levels. The -68/-31 segment lacks a canonical IRF responsive element but contains a single SP1 binding site. Mutation of this element abrogates SP1-dependent enhancement of CDK2 promoter activity as expected but also abolishes IRF1-mediated repression. Forced elevation of SP1 levels increases endogenous CDK2 levels, whereas IRF1 reduces both endogenous SP1 and CDK2 protein levels. Hence, IRF1 represses CDK2 gene expression by interfering with SP1-dependent transcriptional activation. Our findings establish a causal series of events that functionally connect the anti-proliferative effects of interferons with the IRF1-dependent suppression of the CDK2 gene, which encodes a key regulator of the G1/S phase transition.

Identification of a human homologue of the DREF transcription factor with a potential role in regulation of the histone H1 gene

A human homologue (hDREF/KIAA0785) of Drosophila DREF, a transcriptional regulatory factor required for expression of genes involved in DNA replication and cell proliferation, was identified by BLAST search. Amino acid sequences corresponding to three regions highly conserved between two Drosophila species also proved to be very similar in the hDREF/KIAA0785 polypeptide. A consensus binding sequence (5'-TGTCG(C/T)GA(C/T)A) for hDREF/KIAA0785, determined by the CASTing method, overlapped with that for the Drosophila DREF (5'-TGTCGATA). We found hDREF/KIAA0785 binding sequences in the promoter regions of human genes related to cell proliferation. Analyses using a specific antibody revealed that an hDREF/KIAA0785 binds to the promoter region of the histone H1 gene. Co-transfection experiments with an hDREF/KIAA0785-expressing plasmid and a histone H1 promoter-directed luciferase reporter plasmid in HeLa cells revealed possible activation of the histone H1 promoter. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that hDREF/KIAA0785 is localized in the nuclei. Although the expression level of the factor was found to be low in serum-deprived human normal fibroblasts, the amount was increased by adding serum to cultures and reached a maximum during S phase. RNA interference experiments targeting hDREF/KIAA0785 resulted in inhibition of S phase entry and reduction of histone H1 mRNA in HeLa cells. These results suggest that expression of hDREF/KIAA0785 may have a role in regulation of human genes related to cell proliferation.

Virus-induced heterodimer formation between IRF-5 and IRF-7 modulates assembly of the IFNA enhanceosome in vivo and transcriptional activity of IFNA genes

Transcription factors of the interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family have been identified as critical mediators of early inflammatory gene transcription in infected cells. We have shown previously that IRF-5, like IRF-3 and IRF-7, is a direct transducer of virus-mediated signaling and plays a role in the expression of multiple cytokines/chemokines. The present study is focused on the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation and function of IRF-5/IRF-7 heterodimers in infected cells. The interaction between IRF-5 and IRF-7 is not cooperative and results in a repression rather than enhancement of IFNA gene transcription. The formation of the IRF-5/IRF-7 heterodimer is dependent on IRF-7 phosphorylation, as shown by the glutathione S-transferase pull-down and immunoprecipitation assays. Mapping of the interaction domain revealed that formation of IRF-5/IRF-7 heterodimers occurs through the amino terminus resulting in a masking of the DNA binding domain, the consequent alteration of the composition of the enhanceosome complex binding to IFNA promoters in vivo, and modulation of the expression profile of IFNA subtypes. Thus, these results indicate that IRF-5 can act as both an activator and a repressor of IFN gene induction dependent on the IRF-interacting partner, and IRF-5 may be a part of the regulatory network that ensures timely expression of the immediate early inflammatory genes.

The cyclin E/Cdk2 substrate and Cajal body component p220(NPAT) activates histone transcription through a novel LisH-like domain

p220(NPAT) is a substrate of cyclin E/Cdk2 that localizes in nuclear organelles called Cajal bodies in a cell cycle-regulated manner. In normal diploid fibroblasts, p220 is concentrated in two Cajal bodies tethered to histone gene clusters at chromosome 6p21 during G(1), S, and G(2) phases and two additional Cajal bodies tethered to histone genes at 1q21 during S, and G(2) phases. Overexpression of p220 in U2OS cells can promote the G(1)/S transition and can also promote transcription from histone H2B and H4 luciferase reporter constructs. How p220 expression induces these activities and whether the two activities are related are unknown. In this study, we developed a "lox-scanning" mutagenesis approach to identify functional domains in p220. We identified two distinct functional regions of p220. The C-terminal half of the protein contains multiple elements that are required for its ability to induce S phase in transfected cells. In contrast, sequences at the N terminus appear to be critical for activation of histone H4 and H2B reporter constructs. We identified an approximately 30-amino-acid motif at the N terminus of p220 that has the characteristics of a LisH motif. LisH motifs are found in a large number of proteins in the database but are of unknown function. Point mutations in conserved residues in the LisH motif of p220 block histone H4 transcriptional activity without affecting localization in Cajal bodies or phosphorylation on Cdk2 phosphorylation sites. These studies indicate that the ability of p220 to promote S phase is independent of its ability to promote histone H4 transcription and suggests that p220 may link cyclin E/Cdk2 to multiple independent downstream functions.

CDP/Cux stimulates transcription from the DNA polymerase alpha gene promoter

CDP/Cux (CCAAT-displacement protein/cut homeobox) contains four DNA binding domains, namely, three Cut repeats (CR1, CR2, and CR3) and a Cut homeodomain. CCAAT-displacement activity involves rapid but transient interaction with DNA. More stable DNA binding activity is up-regulated at the G(1)/S transition and was previously shown to involve an N-terminally truncated isoform, CDP/Cux p110, that is generated by proteolytic processing. CDP/Cux has been previously characterized as a transcriptional repressor. However, here we show that expression of reporter plasmids containing promoter sequences from the human DNA polymerase alpha (pol alpha), CAD, and cyclin A genes is stimulated in cotransfections with N-terminally truncated CDP/Cux proteins but not with full-length CDP/Cux. Moreover, expression of the endogenous DNA pol alpha gene was stimulated following the infection of cells with a retrovirus expressing a truncated CDP/Cux protein. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays revealed that CDP/Cux was associated with the DNA pol alpha gene promoter specifically in the S phase. Using linker scanning analyses, in vitro DNA binding, and ChIP assays, we established a correlation between binding of CDP/Cux to the DNA pol alpha promoter and the stimulation of gene expression. Although we cannot exclude the possibility that stimulation of gene expression by CDP/Cux involved the repression of a repressor, our data support the notion that CDP/Cux participates in transcriptional activation. Notwithstanding its mechanism of action, these results establish CDP/Cux as an important transcriptional regulator in the S phase.

Maintenance of open chromatin and selective genomic occupancy at the cell cycle-regulated histone H4 promoter during differentiation of HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells

During the shutdown of proliferation and onset of differentiation of HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells, expression of the cell cycle-dependent histone genes is downregulated at the level of transcription. To address the mechanism by which this regulation occurs, we examined the chromatin structure of the histone H4/n (FO108, H4FN) gene locus. Micrococcal nuclease, DNase I, and restriction enzymes show similar cleavage sites and levels of sensitivity at the H4/n locus in both proliferating and differentiated HL-60 cells. In contrast, differentiation-related activation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(cip1/WAF1) gene is accompanied by increased nuclease hypersensitivity. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays of the H4/n gene reveal that acetylated histones H3 and H4 are maintained at the same levels in proliferating and postproliferative cells. Thus, the chromatin of the H4/n locus remains in an open state even after transcription ceases. Using ligation-mediated PCR to visualize genomic DNase I footprints at single-nucleotide resolution, we find that protein occupancy at the site II cell cycle element is selectively diminished in differentiated cells while the site I element remains occupied. Decreased occupancy of site II is reflected by loss of the site II binding protein HiNF-P. We conclude that H4 gene transcription during differentiation is downregulated by modulating protein interaction at the site II cell cycle element and that retention of an open chromatin conformation may be associated with site I occupancy.

Genetic ablation of the CDP/Cux protein C terminus results in hair cycle defects and reduced male fertility

Murine CDP/Cux, a homologue of the Drosophila Cut homeoprotein, modulates the promoter activity of cell cycle-related and cell-type-specific genes. CDP/Cux interacts with histone gene promoters as the DNA binding subunit of a large nuclear complex (HiNF-D). CDP/Cux is a ubiquitous protein containing four conserved DNA binding domains: three Cut repeats and a homeodomain. In this study, we analyzed genetically targeted mice (Cutl1(tm2Ejn), referred to as Delta C) that express a mutant CDP/Cux protein with a deletion of the C terminus, including the homeodomain. In comparison to the wild-type protein, indirect immunofluorescence showed that the mutant protein exhibited significantly reduced nuclear localization. Consistent with these data, DNA binding activity of HiNF-D was lost in nuclear extracts derived from mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) or adult tissues of homozygous mutant (Delta C(-/-)) mice, indicating the functional loss of CDP/Cux protein in the nucleus. No significant difference in growth characteristics or total histone H4 mRNA levels was observed between wild-type and Delta C(-/-) MEFs in culture. However, specific histone genes (H4.1 and H1) containing CDP/Cux binding sites have reduced expression levels in homozygous mutant MEFs. Stringent control of growth and differentiation appears to be compromised in vivo. Homozygous mutant mice have stunted growth (20 to 50% weight reduction), a high postnatal death rate of 60 to 70%, sparse abnormal coat hair, and severely reduced fertility. The deregulated hair cycle and severely diminished fertility in Cutl1(tm2Ejn/tm2Ejn) mice suggest that CDP/Cux is required for the developmental control of dermal and reproductive functions.

Purification and functional analysis of a novel leucine-zipper/nucleotide-fold protein, BZAP45, stimulating cell cycle regulated histone H4 gene transcription

Regulation of histone gene transcription at the G1/S phase transition via the Site II cell cycle control element is distinct from E2F-dependent mechanisms operative at the growth factor-related restriction point. E2F-independent activation of histone H4 gene expression combines contributions of several promoter factors, including HiNF-M/IRF2 and the HiNF-D/CDP-cut complex which contains pRB, CDK1, and cyclin A as non-DNA binding subunits. Mutational analyses suggest additional rate-limiting factors for Site II function. Using sequence-specific Site II DNA affinity chromatography, we identified a 45 kDa protein (KIAA0005 or BZAP45) that is embryonically expressed and phylogenetically conserved. Based on amino acid sequence analysis, BZAP45 contains a unique decapeptide that is part of a putative leucine-zipper protein with a nucleotide (ATP or GTP) binding fold. Bacterial expression of a full-length cDNA produces a 45 kDa protein. Binding studies reveal that highly purified BZAP45 does not interact with Site II, suggesting that BZAP45 function may require partner proteins. Forced expression of BZAP45 strongly stimulates H4 promoter (nt -215 to -1)/CAT reporter gene activity. Deletion analyses and point mutations indicate that BZAP45 enhances H4 gene transcription through Site II. Thus, BZAP45 is a novel regulatory factor that contributes to transcriptional control at the G1/S phase transition.

S phase-specific proteolytic cleavage is required to activate stable DNA binding by the CDP/Cut homeodomain protein

The CCAAT displacement protein (CDP), the homologue of the Drosophila melanogaster Cut protein, contains four DNA binding domains that function in pairs. Cooperation between Cut repeat 3 and the Cut homeodomain allows stable DNA binding to the ATCGAT motif, an activity previously shown to be upregulated in S phase. Here we showed that the full-length CDP/Cut protein is incapable of stable DNA binding and that the ATCGAT binding activity present in cells involves a 110-kDa carboxy-terminal peptide of CDP/Cut. A vector expressing CDP/Cut with Myc and hemagglutinin epitope tags at either end generated N- and C-terminal products of 90 and 110 kDa, suggesting that proteolytic cleavage was involved. In vivo pulse/chase labeling experiments confirmed that the 110-kDa protein was derived from the full-length CDP/Cut protein. Proteolytic processing was weak or not detectable in G(0) and G(1) but increased in populations of cells enriched in S phase, and the appearance of the 110-kDa protein coincided with the increase in ATCGAT DNA binding. Interestingly, the amino-truncated and the full-length CDP/Cut isoforms exhibited different transcriptional properties in a reporter assay. We conclude that proteolytic processing of CDP/Cut at the G(1)/S transition generates a CDP/Cut isoform with distinct DNA binding and transcriptional activities. These findings, together with the cleavage of the Scc1 protein at mitosis, suggest that site-specific proteolysis may play an important role in the regulation of cell cycle progression.

Role of the multifunctional CDP/Cut/Cux homeodomain transcription factor in regulating differentiation, cell growth and development

CDP/Cux/Cut proteins are an evolutionarily conserved family of proteins containing several DNA binding domains: one Cut homeodomain and one, two or three Cut repeats. In Drosophila melanogaster, genetic studies indicated that Cut functions as a determinant of cell-type specification in several tissues, notably in the peripheral nervous system, the wing margin and the Malpighian tubule. Moreover, Cut was found to be a target and an effector of the Notch signaling pathway. In vertebrates, the same functions appear to be fulfilled by two cut-related genes with distinct patterns of expression. Cloning of the cDNA for the CCAAT-displacement protein (CDP) revealed that it was the human homologue of Drosophila Cut. CDP was later found be the DNA binding protein of the previously characterized histone nuclear factor D (HiNF-D). CDP and its mouse counterpart, Cux, were also reported to interact with regulatory elements from a large number of genes, including matrix attachment regions (MARs). CDP/Cut proteins were found generally to function as transcriptional repressors, although a participation in transcriptional activation is suggested by some data. Repression by CDP/Cut involves competition for binding site occupancy and active repression via the recruitment of a histone deacetylase activity. Various combinations of Cut repeats and the Cut homeodomains can generate distinct DNA binding activities. These activities are elevated in proliferating cells and decrease during terminal differentiation. One activity, involving the Cut homeodomain, is upregulated in S phase. CDP/Cut function is regulated by several post-translational modification events including phosphorylation, dephosphorylation, and acetylation. The CUTL1 gene in human was mapped to 7q22, a chromosomal region that is frequently rearranged in various cancers.

The cell cycle control element of histone H4 gene transcription is maximally responsive to interferon regulatory factor pairs IRF-1/IRF-3 and IRF-1/IRF-7

Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) are transcriptional mediators of interferon-responsive signaling pathways that are involved in antiviral defense, immune response, and cell growth regulation. To investigate the role of IRF proteins in the regulation of histone H4 gene transcription, we compared the transcriptional contributions of IRF-1, IRF-2, IRF-3, and IRF-7 using transient transfection assays with H4 promoter/luciferase (Luc) reporter genes. These IRF proteins up-regulate reporter gene expression but IRF-1, IRF-3, and IRF-7 are more potent activators of the H4 promoter than IRF-2. Forced expression of different IRF combinations reveals that IRF-2 reduces IRF-1 or IRF-3 dependent activation, but does not affect IRF-7 function. Thus, IRF-2 may have a dual function in histone H4 gene transcription by acting as a weak activator at low dosage and a competitive inhibitor of other strongly activating IRFs at high levels. IRF-1/IRF-3 and IRF-1/IRF-7 pairs each mediate the highest levels of site II-dependent promoter activity and can up-regulate transcription by 120-150-fold. We also find that interferon gamma up-regulates IRF-1 and site II-dependent promoter activity. This up-regulation is not observed when the IRF site is mutated or if cells are preloaded with IRF-1. Our results indicate that IRF-1, IRF-2, IRF-3, and IRF-7 can all regulate histone H4 gene expression. The pairwise utilization of distinct IRF factors provides a flexible transcriptional mechanism for integration of diverse growth-related signaling pathways.

Molecular characterization of celtix-1, a bromodomain protein interacting with the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor 2

Transcriptional control at the G1/S-phase transition of the cell cycle requires functional interactions of multimeric promoter regulatory complexes that contain DNA binding proteins, transcriptional cofactors, and/or chromatin modifying enzymes. Transcriptional regulation of the human histone H4/n gene (FO108) is mediated by Interferon Regulatory Factor-2 (IRF-2), as well as other histone gene promoter factors. To identify proteins that interact with cell-cycle regulatory factors, we performed yeast two-hybrid analysis with IRF-2 and identified a novel human protein termed Celtix-1 which binds to IRF-2. Celtix-1 contains several phylogenetically conserved domains, including a bromodomain, which is found in a number of transcriptional cofactors. Using a panel of IRF-2 deletion mutants in yeast two-hybrid assays, we established that Celtix-1 contacts the C-terminus of IRF-2. Celtix-1 directly interacts with IRF-2 based on binding studies with glutathione S-transferase (GST)/IRF-2 fusion proteins, and immunofluorescence studies suggest that Celtix-1 and IRF-2 associate in situ. Celtix-1 is distributed throughout the nucleus in a heterodisperse pattern. A subset of Celtix-1 colocalizes with the hyperacetylated forms of histones H3 and H4, as well as with the hyperphosphorylated, transcriptionally active form of RNA polymerase II. We conclude that the bromodomain protein Celtix-1 is a novel IRF-2 interacting protein that associates with transcriptionally active chromatin in situ.

CCAAT displacement activity involves CUT repeats 1 and 2, not the CUT homeodomain

The CCAAT displacement protein, the homolog of the Drosophila melanogaster CUT protein, contains four DNA-binding domains: three CUT repeats (CR1, CR2, and CR3) and the CUT homeodomain (HD). Using a panel of fusion proteins, we found that a CUT repeat cannot bind to DNA as a monomer, but that certain combinations of domains exhibit high DNA-binding affinity: CR1+2, CR3HD, CR1HD, and CR2HD. One combination (CR1+2) exhibited strikingly different DNA-binding kinetics and specificities. CR1+2 displayed rapid on and off rates and bound preferably to two C(A/G)AT sites, organized as direct or inverted repeats. Accordingly, only CR1+2 was able to bind to the CCAAT sequence, and its affinity was increased by the presence of a C(A/G)AT site at close proximity. A purified CCAAT displacement protein/CUT protein exhibited DNA-binding properties similar to those of CR1+2; and in nuclear extracts, the CCAAT displacement activity also required the simultaneous presence of a C(A/G)AT site. Moreover, CR1+2, but not CR3HD, was able to displace nuclear factor Y. Thus, the CCAAT displacement activity requires the presence of an additional sequence (CAAT or CGAT) and involves CR1 and CR2, but not the CUT homeodomain.

CDP/Cut DNA binding activity is down-modulated in granulocytes, macrophages and erythrocytes but remains elevated in differentiating megakaryocytes

DNA binding by the CCAAT-displacement protein, the mammalian homologue of the Drosophila melanogaster Cut protein, was previously found to increase sharply in S phase, suggesting a role for CDP/Cut in cell cycle progression. Genetic studies in Drosophila indicated that cut plays an important role in cell-type specification in several tissues. In the present study, we have investigated CDP/Cut expression and activity in a panel of multipotent hematopoietic cell lines that can be induced to differentiate in vitro into distinct cell types. While CDP/Cut DNA binding activity declined in the pathways leading to macrophages, granulocytes and erythrocytes, it remained elevated in megakaryocytes. CDP/Cut was also highly expressed in primary megakaryocytes isolated from mouse, and some DNA binding activity could be detected. Altogether, these results raise the possibility that CDP/Cut may be a determinant of cell type identity downstream of the myelo-erythroid precursor cell. Another possibility, which does not exclude a role in lineage identity, is that CDP/Cut activity in megakaryocytes is linked to endomitosis. Indeed, elevated CDP/Cut activity in differentiating megakaryocytes and during the S phase of the cell cycle suggests that it may be required for DNA replication.

Differentiation-related mechanisms which suppress DNA replication

Differentiation of mammalian cells implies cessation of DNA replication and cell proliferation; the potential controls of this coupling are examined here. It is clear that the known or proposed mechanisms of down-regulation of replicative cellular activities vary in different lineages of cell differentiation, and occur in all phases of the cell cycle. In G1 these regulators include p21/Cip1 or p27/Kip1, pRb, and p53; the novel, recently reported mechanisms of their action are summarized. In S phase the availability of nucleotide precursors, the origin recognition complex (ORC), and other replication proteins may be important in differentiation, and in G2 phase the cdc2/cyclin B complex and replication licensing factors determine normal G2 traverse versus an arrest or polyploidisation. Other replication-related mechanisms include transcription factors, e.g., Sp1, telomerase, and nuclear matrix changes. Thus, differentiation alters the activity not only of the various checkpoint proteins, but also of the components of the replicative machinery itself.

Selective expression of specific histone H4 genes reflects distinctions in transcription factor interactions with divergent H4 promoter elements

Expression of many histone H4 genes is stringently controlled during the cell cycle to maintain a functional coupling of histone biosynthesis with DNA replication. The histone H4 multigene family provides a paradigm for understanding cell cycle control of gene transcription. All functional histone H4 gene copies are highly conserved in the mRNA coding region. However, the putative promoter regions of these H4 genes are divergent. We analyzed three representative mouse H4 genes to assess whether variation in H4 promoter sequences has functional consequences for the relative level and temporal control of expression of distinct H4 genes. Using S1 nuclease protection assays with gene-specific probes and RNA from synchronized cells, we show that the mRNA level of each H4 gene is temporally coupled to DNA synthesis. However, there are differences in the relative mRNA levels of these three H4 gene copies in several cell types. Based on gel shift assays, nucleotide variations in the promoters of these H4 genes preclude or reduce binding of several histone gene transcription factors, including IRF2, HiNF-D, SP-1 and/or YY1. Therefore, differential regulation of H4 genes is directly attributable to evolutionary divergence in H4 promoter organization which dictates the potential for regulatory interactions with cognate H4 transcription factors. This regulatory flexibility in H4 promoter organization may maximize options for transcriptional control of histone H4 gene expression in response to the onset of DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression in a broad spectrum of cell types and developmental stages.