Phase II study of continuous-infusion high-dose ifosfamide in advanced and/or metastatic pretreated soft tissue sarcomas

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Pediatric Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Standard of Care and Treatment Recommendations from the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG)

This paper describes the standard of care for patients with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) and the therapeutic recommendations developed by the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). NRSTS form a very mixed group of mesenchymal extraskeletal malignancies. Their rarity, heterogeneity, and aggressiveness make the management of children and adolescents with these tumors complex and challenging. The overall cure rate for patients with NRSTS is around 70%, but survival depends on several prognostic variables, such as histotype and tumor grade, extent of disease and stage, tumor size, and tumor site. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for most of these tumors, a multimodal therapeutic approach including radiotherapy and chemotherapy is required in many cases. The EpSSG NRSTS 2005 study was the first prospective protocol tailored specifically to NRSTS. Together with the ARST0332 study developed by the North-American Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group (COG), the EpSSG NRSTS 2005 study currently represents the benchmark for these tumors, establishing risk-adapted standards of care. The EpSSG has developed common treatment recommendations for the large group of adult-type NRSTS (including synovial sarcoma), and specific treatment recommendations for other particular adult-type histologies (ie, alveolar soft-part sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans); other highly malignant tumors with a biology and clinical behavior differing from those of adult-type NRSTS (ie, rhabdoid tumors and desmoplastic small round cell tumor); and soft tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy (ie desmoid-type fibromatosis, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, and infantile fibrosarcoma). New effective drugs are needed for patients whose NRSTS carries the worst prognosis, ie, those with unresectable tumors, metastases at diagnosis, or relapsing disease. Progress in this area relies on our ability to develop international integrated prospective collaborations, both within existing pediatric oncology networks and, importantly, between the communities of specialists treating pediatric and adult sarcoma.

Phase II study of dacarbazine given with modern prophylactic anti-emetics and growth factor support to patients with metastatic, resistant soft tissue, and bone sarcoma

Historically, administration of dacarbazine to sarcoma patients was limited by frequent treat-ment-related nausea/vomiting and neutropenia. These toxicities are now largely preventable with contemporary antiemetics and growth factor support. In this single-arm, phase II study, dacarbazine 850 mg/m² was given on day 1 of each 3-week cycle until disease progression or intolerance with prophylactic serotonin-3 receptor, neurokinin-1 antagonists, corticosteroids, and pegfilgrastim. Coprimary endpoints included clinical benefit rate (CBR), and any grade of nausea/vomiting and/or grade 3–4 neutropenia. With a sample size of 80 patients, >24 patients with clinical benefit would indicate that the CBR exceeds the historical (<20%) [Power 0.80; alpha 0.05]. In addition, we hypothesized that the rates of nausea/vomiting would be 27% and grade 3–4 neutropenia would be 1% (historical: 90% and 36%, respectively) [power 0.95; alpha 0.05]. The CBR was 30% (24 patients: PR-2 and stable-22). The rate of nausea/vomiting was 37.5% (31 patients) and grades 3–4 neutropenia was 10% (8 patients). Median time-to-progression was 8.1 weeks (95% CI 8–9.7) and median overall survival was 35.8 weeks (95% CI 26.2–55.4). PET scans demonstrated no association with response. Modern prophylactic anti-emetics and pegfilgrastim given with dacarbazine reduced the rates of treatment related nausea/vomiting and serious neutropenia.

Continuous 14 Day Infusional Ifosfamide for Management of Soft-Tissue and Bone Sarcoma: A Single Centre Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Simple Summary

Ifosfamide is commonly used to treat patients with soft-tissue and bone sarcoma, with greater efficacy observed with higher doses that generally require inpatient treatment and may result in significant myelosuppression and renal toxicity. In the palliative setting, continuous infusional ifosfamide (14 g/m²/14 days) is increasingly employed in an attempt to mitigate toxicity, and for ease of administration as an outpatient regimen. This study describes the efficacy and toxicity profile of 14-day continuous infusional ifosfamide in adult and teenage young adult (TYA) patients with relapsed or metastatic soft-tissue and bone sarcoma.

Abstract

Ifosfamide is used to treat soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcoma (BS), with improved efficacy at doses above 9 g/m²/cycle. To mitigate treatment-associated toxicity with higher doses, continuous infusional ifosfamide is increasingly used. However, clinical outcome data remain limited. Single-centre retrospective analysis of patients treated with four-weekly infusional ifosfamide (14 g/m²/14d) between August 2012 and February 2019 was conducted. Radiological response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated. Eighty patients were treated—46 with STS and 34 with BS. Patients received a median of three cycles of infusional ifosfamide (1–24). Overall disease control rate (DCR) in STS was 50% (23 of 46 patients), with a median PFS of 3.8 months, and median OS of 13.0 months. In synovial sarcoma (SS), DCR was 80% (12/15), median PFS 8.1 months and median OS 20.9 months. Overall DCR in BS (34 patients) was 30%, with a median PFS of 2.5 months and median OS of 6.2 months. Five patients (6%) stopped treatment due to toxicity alone within the first two cycles. A further 10 patients stopped treatment due to toxicity during later treatment cycles (12%) and 18 patients (23%) required dose modification. Forty-five patients (56%) experienced grade (G) 3/4 haematological toxicity, with 12 episodes of febrile neutropenia and one treatment-related death. Twenty-seven patients (34%) experienced G3/4 non-haematological toxicity, most commonly nausea and vomiting (10, 13%). In summary, infusional ifosfamide has efficacy in STS, most notable in SS. Benefit appears limited in BS. Treatment is associated with toxicity that requires specialist supportive care.

A sub-Saharan African experience in the surgical management of soft tissue sarcomas in an oncology unit in: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) consist of over 70 histologic subtypes and constitute only 1% of adult malignancies. The fulcrum of management is surgical resection with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment-chemoradiation.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective review of consecutive STS patients who had surgery at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, between October 2007-2017. Data extraction was from the admission and operative registers, theatre records and histology reports. Statistical analysis was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 (Chicago IL USA). Results were summarized as charts and graphs.

RESULTS

Five hundred and ninety six cases of STS were seen over the ten-year period. Of these, 383 (64.3%) patients had surgery and the case files of 326 (85.1%) of these patients was available for review. The duration of soft tissue swelling, ranged from 1-96 months. A third of the tumors were superficial while 68% were deep-seated. Oncoplastic reconstruction was done in 42(13%) patients. The resection margin was negative in 88%. A total of 202 patients were followed up regularly for between 24-36 months only.

CONCLUSION

Patients who benefitted from definitive surgical treatment for STS were found to be the young and middle age group. These patients had extended duration of symptoms with lesions > 5cm in size. Truncal and visceral STS had the worst prognosis. A Multi-Disciplinary Tumor (MDT) board for STS and a robust follow up would enhance the management of STS in a low resource setting.

A case of heavily pretreated metastatic cardiac angiosarcoma treated successfully using eribulin

Eribulin mesylate (eribulin) is a nontaxane microtubule inhibitor approved in Japan for treating soft tissue sarcoma irrespective of histological subtypes. Thus, our department routinely uses eribulin to treat any histological subtype of sarcoma for patients who have experienced disease progression during standard therapy. However, evidence on the efficacy of eribulin in treating sarcomas that are neither liposarcoma nor leiomyosarcoma is limited. Recently, we encountered a case of a heavily pretreated cardiac angiosarcoma that responded well to eribulin treatment. The patient was a 34-year-old Japanese woman with advanced angiosarcoma, who had been pretreated heavily using several lines of chemotherapy. Eribulin was administered as the eighth line of treatment and the dose was adjusted because of grade 4 neutropenia. After three cycles of treatment, contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed a partial tumor response, which was sustained for ~4 months. This case suggests that eribulin may be a potential therapeutic option for angiosarcoma. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefit of eribulin for patients with angiosarcoma and to establish predictive markers for eribulin sensitivity.

Managing sarcoma: where have we come from and where are we going?

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms of mesenchymal origin. Approximately 80% arise from soft tissue and 20% originate from bone. To date more than 100 sarcoma subtypes have been identified and they vary in molecular characteristics, pathology, clinical presentation and response to treatment. While sarcomas represent <1% of adult cancers, they account for approximately 21% of paediatric malignancies and thus pose some of the greatest risks of mortality and morbidity in children and young adults. Metastases occur in one-third of all patients and approximately 10-20% of sarcomas recur locally. Surgery in combination with preoperative and postoperative therapies is the primary treatment for localized sarcoma tumours and is the most promising curative possibility. Metastasized sarcomas, on the other hand, are treated primarily with single-agent or combination chemotherapy, but this rarely leads to a complete and robust response and often becomes a palliative form of treatment. The heterogeneity of sarcomas results in variable responses to current generalized treatment strategies. In light of this and the lack of curative strategies for metastatic and unresectable sarcomas, there is a need for novel subtype-specific treatment strategies. With the more recent understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of some of these tumours, the treatment of sarcoma subtypes with targeted therapies is a rapidly evolving field. This review discusses the current management of sarcomas as well as promising new therapies that are currently underway in clinical trials.

High-Dose Ifosfamide Chemotherapy in a Series of Patients Affected by Myxoid Liposarcoma

Background

To report on the activity of high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide (HDIFX) chemotherapy in a retrospective series of patients affected by myxoid liposarcoma treated at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori in Milan, Italy.

Patients and Methods

Patients with an advanced myxoid liposarcoma treated with HDIFX (14 g/sqm, i.v., prolonged infusion of 14 days every 28 days) as a single agent between May 2002 and April 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. All pathologic diagnoses were centrally reviewed and molecularly confirmed. Response was evaluated by RECIST, and survival functions were computed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Eleven patients with advanced myxoid liposarcoma were treated with HDIFX (male/female = 9/2, median age 33 years, range 31–75). Among these, 1/11 received HDIFX in first line, 5/11 in second line, 3/11 in third line, and 2/11 in fourth line for a median course number of 3 (range 2–7). No RECIST objective responses were observed. Overall median progression-free survival was 1,9 months. Median overall survival was 37 months. At a median follow-up of 115 months, 1 patient is alive.

Conclusions

In this series of patients affected by advanced myxoid liposarcoma, chemotherapy with HDIFX was essentially inactive.

Activity of anthracycline- and ifosfamide-based chemotherapy in a series of patients affected by advanced myxofibrosarcoma

BACKGROUND

We report on the activity of anthracycline-based and high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide chemotherapy in a retrospective series of patients affected by advanced myxofibrosarcoma treated at Istituto Nazionale Tumori in Milan, Italy, and within the Italian Rare Cancer Network (RTR).

METHODS

Advanced myxofibrosarcoma patients treated with anthracycline + ifosfamide and high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide as a single agent from November 2001 to December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. All pathological diagnosis were centrally reviewed by at least two expert pathologists. Response was evaluated by RECIST, and survival functions were computed.

RESULTS

Among 34 advanced myxofibrosarcoma patients, 13 were treated with front-line anthracycline + ifosfamide chemotherapy (male/female = 6/7, median age 54 years, range 33-72). Overall best response was: 4 partial responses, 3 stable diseases and 6 progressive diseases, with a median progression-free survival of 4 months. Twenty-eight patients received second/further line high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide (male/female = 17/11, median age 55 years, range 27-75 years). We observed 10 partial responses, 4 stable diseases and 14 progressive diseases, with a median progression-free survival of 4 months. Median overall survival was 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis suggests that the combination of anthracyclines and ifosfamide is active in myxofibrosarcoma. In patients already treated with a combination of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, high-dose prolonged-infusion ifosfamide showed activity as well.

Treatment of advanced, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: latest evidence and clinical considerations

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a biologically heterogeneous malignancy with over 50 subtypes. Historically, there have been few systemic treatment options for this relatively rare disease. Traditional cytotoxic agents, such as anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and taxanes have limited clinical benefit beyond the first-line setting; across all high-grade STS subtypes, median overall survival remains approximately 12-18 months for advanced metastatic disease. The development of targeted therapies has led to recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of four new treatments for high-grade STS in the advanced metastatic setting. Among these, olaratumab is most notable for its improvement in overall survival for patients with anthracycline-naïve disease. Further progress in STS management will rely on novel trial design, subtype-specific therapies and validation of biomarkers to tailor therapy. Immunotherapy has shown promise as a new, but yet undiscovered frontier in the management of STS.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues, and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. However, this makes it more important that STS are managed by teams, expert in such cases, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, as well as recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous version published in 2010 (Grimer et al. in Sarcoma 2010:506182, 2010). The original guidelines were drawn up following a consensus meeting of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This current version has been updated and amended with reference to other European and US guidance. There are specific recommendations for the management of selected subtypes of disease including retroperitoneal and uterine sarcomas, as well as aggressive fibromatosis (desmoid tumours) and other borderline tumours commonly managed by sarcoma services. An important aim in sarcoma management is early diagnosis and prompt referral. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to one of the specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma services, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging, plus a biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon. In tumours at higher risk of recurrence or metastasis pre- or post-operative radiotherapy should be considered. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilized in some cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late-effects of treatment. For local recurrence, and more rarely in selected cases of metastatic disease, surgical resection would be considered. Treatment for metastases may include radiotherapy, or systemic therapy guided by the sarcoma subtype. In some cases, symptom control and palliative care support alone will be appropriate.

Continuous-infusion ifosfamide and doxorubicin combination as second-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma patients in China: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of response to continuous-infusion ifosfamide and doxorubicin combination as second-line chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighteen recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma patients who were treated with continuous-infusion ifosfamide and doxorubicin combination between May 1999 and April 2011 were included in the analysis. Ifosfamide at 12 g/m2 was administered by intravenous continuous infusion over 3 days, and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 was administered as an intravenous bolus injection on day 1. The combination therapy was repeated every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

The patients (ages 7-53 years) received a total of 42 cycles of chemotherapy (median: 2 courses; range: 2-5 courses). The overall response rate was 0% and the disease control rate was 22.3%, with four patients having stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival time were 2 months (range: 2-5 months) and 9 months (range: 3-29 months), respectively. Major severe toxicities were leucopenia 7 (38.9%), nausea and vomiting 3 (16.7%) and alopecia 9 (50%). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, continuous-infusion ifosfamide and doxorubicin combination therapy at this dosage and schedule was found to be well tolerated and moderate effective, which could be considered as salvage therapy for patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma. Further assessment is necessary to confirm the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

What makes real world outcomes in soft tissue sarcomas? A mono-institutional trabectedin experience

INTRODUCTION

Trabectedin proved its efficacy in relapsed advanced soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in 3 multicenter phase II studies with selected patients. The aim of the present study is to investigate trabectedin efficacy and tolerance in a cohort of "real-life" unselected patients with sarcoma.

METHODS

A single-center analysis was carried out on all consecutive patients with histologically proven unresectable advanced or metastatic STS, who received at least one cycle of trabectedin. Data on efficacy and tolerance were retrospectively reported.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2014, data of 59 patients were reviewed. Median age was 62 years (from 23 to 87). A total of 317 cycles of trabectedin were administered. Twenty-five patients (42%) suffered grade 3-4 hematological toxicity, mainly with neutropenia (22 patients, 37%). Disease control rate was 24%, mainly with stable disease, and 45 patients (76%) experienced disease progression. Median overall survival was 6.6 months (95%CI [4.9-12.6]).

CONCLUSION

Trabectedin might be an option for patients without any other validated alternative, but phase III study evaluating trabectedin+best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC is necessary.

Trabectedin clinical cases: use according to indication in diverse clinical scenarios

SUMMARY 

Background: Key distinguishing characteristics of trabectedin in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma are its prolonged tumor control activity in multiple histological subtypes, positive outcomes in translocation-related sarcomas, maintenance of response, option to rechallenge after treatment interruption and lack of cumulative toxicity. Trabectedin is indicated for use in advanced soft tissue sarcoma after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or as front-line treatment in patients unsuited to receive these agents. Methods: In this review, cases studies are presented in which trabectedin was used according to its indication but in diverse clinical settings. Results: As second-line treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma, trabectedin produced prolonged tumor control with good quality of life. In treatment of recurrent synovial sarcoma, the best objective response (partial response) and longest disease control (37 months) was achieved under treatment with trabectedin. As neoadjuvant treatment of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma in a patient unsuited to receive doxorubicin-based chemotherapy, trabectedin induced a pathological response with 85% of necrosis. Conclusion: These cases illustrate the broad range of indications for trabectedin in advanced soft tissue sarcoma and highlight how its unique characteristics can be optimized to achieve maximum clinical benefit.

High-dose continuous-infusion ifosfamide in advanced well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma

Background

Liposarcomas represent the most common histological type of soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Its main subgroups, WD/DD, is known to be poorly sensitive to chemotherapy, with few active agents, i.e., anthracyclines +/- ifosfamide and trabectedin. High-dose ifosfamide (HDIFX >12 g/m2) is active in STS pts pretreated with standard-dose IFX, though with greater toxicity. A prolonged continuous-infusion (ci) through a portable external pump may be an alternative way to administer HDIFX.

Methods

From March 2002 to August 2013, 28 pts (median age =60, range =37–73 yrs) with advanced disease (6 WD and 22 WD/DD) were given ciHDIFX, at the dose of 14 g/m2 as a 14-day continuous infusion every 4 weeks. Twenty-four pts (86%) were previously treated with chemotherapy (19 with anthracyclines and ifosfamide; 4 with anthracycline monotherapy; 1 with trabectedin).

Results

Seven PR (all in DDLPS), 2 minor response (MR) and 11 SD were observed. Of interest, 6 of 9 patients with PR or MR had had SD with the previous therapy with anthracycline plus ifosfamide. The median progression-free survival was 7 months. Most common side effects were mild myelosuppression (anemia G2-3 in 3 pts; G2-3 neutropenia in 3 pts and G4 in 1; G3 thrombocytopenia in 1 pt); nausea (G3 in 3 pts) and fatigue (G3 in 6 pts). One pts had transient G3 confusion.

Conclusions

These data suggest that ciHDIFX is active in WD/DDLPS, even in patients already treated with a combination of anthracyclines plus ifosfamide. In this series, ciHDIFX regimen was better tolerated than HDIFX in published studies.

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions in second- or later-line treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend anthracycline-based chemotherapy primarily with doxorubicin either as monotherapy or in combination with ifosfamide as the first-line treatment for most advanced STS subtypes. Therapeutic options after failure of doxorubicin and/or ifosfamide are limited. This study aimed to comprehensively review available data on the activity and safety of interventions in second- or later-line treatment of advanced STS.

METHODS

Electronic literature databases (Embase®, MEDLINE®, MEDLINE® In-Process, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were searched from 1980 to 01 March 2012 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies (both prospective and retrospective) evaluating pharmacological interventions in patients with advanced STS pre-treated with anthracycline- and/or ifosfamide-based therapy.

RESULTS

The review identified six RCTs (one phase III and five phase II trials) and 94 non-randomised studies. Based on the primary trial endpoints, RCTs demonstrated favourable efficacy for pazopanib over placebo (PFS: 4.6 months vs. 1.6 months), gemcitabine plus dacarbazine over dacarbazine monotherapy (3-month PFS rate: 54.2% vs. 35.2%), and trabectedin 3-weekly schedule over weekly schedule (TTP: 3.7 months vs. 2.3 months. The non-randomised studies demonstrated heterogeneity in efficacy and safety results.

CONCLUSIONS

Across the RCTs, pazopanib over placebo, gemcitabine-dacarbazine over dacarbazine, and trabectedin 3-weekly over weekly regimen clearly demonstrated a PFS advantage in the second- and later-line treatment of advanced STS. With only one phase III trial in this setting, there is a clear need for additional comparative trials to better understand the risk: benefit ratios of available agents and combinations.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following high dose chemotherapy for non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a highly heterogeneous group of rare malignant solid tumors. Non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) comprise all STS except rhabdomyosarcoma. In patients with advanced local or metastatic disease, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) applied after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) is a planned rescue therapy for HDCT-related severe hematologic toxicity. The rationale for this update is to determine whether any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted and to clarify whether HDCT followed by autologous HSCT has a survival advantage.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of HDCT followed by autologous HSCT for all stages of non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) in children and adults.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update we modified the search strategy to improve the precision and reduce the number of irrelevant hits. All studies included in the original review were considered for re-evaluation in the update. We searched the electronic databases CENTRAL (2012, Issue 11) in The Cochrane Library , MEDLINE and EMBASE (05 December 2012) from their inception using the newly developed search strategy. Online trials registers and reference lists of systematic reviews were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Terms representing STS and autologous HSCT were required in the title or abstract. In studies with aggregated data, participants with NRSTS and autologous HSCT had to constitute at least 80% of the data. Single-arm studies were included in addition to studies with a control arm because the number of comparative studies was expected to be very low.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted study data. Some studies identified in the original review were re-examined and found not to meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded in this update. For studies with no comparator group, we synthesized the results for studies reporting aggregate data and conducted a pooled analysis of individual participant data using the Kaplan-Meyer method. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and treatment-related mortality (TRM).

MAIN RESULTS

The selection process was carried out from the start of the search dates for the update. We included 57 studies, from 260 full text articles screened, reporting on 275 participants that were allocated to HDCT followed by autologous HSCT. All studies were not comparable due to various subtypes. We identified a single comparative study, an RCT comparing HDCT followed by autologous HSCT versus standard chemotherapy (SDCT). The overall survival (OS) at three years was 32.7% versus 49.4% with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 2.29, P value 0.44) and thus not significantly different between the treatment groups. In a subgroup of patients that had a complete response before treatment, OS was higher in both treatment groups and OS at three years was 42.8% versus 83.9% with a HR of 2.92 (95% CI 1.1 to 7.6, P value 0.028) and thus was statistically significantly better in the SDCT group. We did not identify any other comparative studies. We included six single-arm studies reporting aggregate data of cases; three reported the OS at two years as 20%, 48%, and 51.4%. One other study reported the OS at three years as 40% and one further study reported a median OS of 13 months (range 3 to 19 months). In two of the single-arm studies with aggregate data, subgroup analysis showed a better OS in patients with versus without a complete response before treatment. In a survival analysis of pooled individual data of 80 participants, OS at two years was estimated as 50.6% (95% CI 38.7 to 62.5) and at three years as 36.7% (95% CI 24.4 to 49.0). Data on TRM, secondary neoplasia and severe toxicity grade 3 to 4 after transplantation were sparse. The one included RCT had a low risk of bias and the remaining 56 studies had a high risk of bias.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A single RCT with a low risk of bias shows that OS after HDCT followed by autologous HSCT is not statistically significantly different from standard-dose chemotherapy. Therefore, HDCT followed by autologous HSCT for patients with NRSTS may not improve the survival of patients and should only be used within controlled trials if ever considered.

Clinical efficacy of vorinostat in a patient with leiomyosarcoma

Leiomyosarcoma is a heterogeneous tumor group, representing <1% of all new cancers diagnosed in United States. Treatment choice is based upon site, grade, and extent of disease. However, prognosis for metastatic or unresectable sarcoma is very poor with reported median survival of 12 months. Response to chemotherapy has been approximately 8% to 39% based upon the chemotherapeutic agent and whether used alone or in combination. Vorinostat is an orally active, potent, and competitive inhibitor of histone deacetylases approved for cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. There are limited preclinical data illustrating the activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors in sarcoma. Here is a case of a lady with leiomyosarcoma who has progressed through multiple chemotherapeutic agent who has achieved a partial response to vorinostat treatment.

Systematic therapy for unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas: past, present, and future

Unresectable or metastatic disease occurs in 40% to 60% of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients and portends a poor prognosis. For decades, doxorubicin has formed the backbone of systemic treatment, with response rates of approximately 26%. Patients progressing following first-line therapy were left with few proven options. No other cytotoxic chemotherapy agent or combination has demonstrated superiority to doxorubicin. Advances in targeted therapy of STS have been hindered by STS heterogeneity and poorly understood disease biology. Despite challenges, progress has been made in specific STS subtypes. Here, we highlight the challenges, progress, and lessons learned from STS trials published in the last 20 to 25 years.

Histology-driven chemotherapy of soft-tissue sarcoma

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare diseases with >50 subtypes. Surgery is the most important treatment in localized disease, sometimes combined with radiotherapy. Chemotherapy is used as palliation in advanced disease, sometimes also with a potential to decrease tumour size and eradicate micro-metastases, making meaningful surgery possible. The role of chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment in localized disease is not finally settled. Doxorubicin and ifosfamide are the two drugs with the best established response rates in soft-tissue sarcoma, and a combination of these drugs has been a 'gold standard' for several years. However, there is an emerging knowledge of the biology and sensitivity to treatment for different histological subtypes. New drugs such as gemcitabine, taxanes and trabectedin have been explored in several studies, showing promising results. Even if most studies have encompassed many different subtypes and were limited in size, knowledge related to specific treatment for different subtypes is emerging. Examples are trabectedin in lyposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, and taxanes in angiosarcoma.

Phase II Trial of Doxorubicin Plus Escalated High-Dose Ifosfamide in Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Adult: A Study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS)

Background. To explore the tolerance and the activity of high-dose ifosfamide (IFOS) combined with doxorubicin (DXR) at 50 mg/m² every 4 weeks in patients with soft tissue sarcomas. Methods. DXR was given IV bolus and IFOS by continuous infusion at 2 g/m²/day. Initial IFOS dose (12 g/m²) was adjusted to 10, 13, or 14 g/m² according to toxicity. Results. Seventy patients received 277 cycles (median 3 cycles, range 1–10), 34% with IFOS dose increased, 30% decreased, and 48% delivered at 12 g/m². Toxicity grade 4 occurred on granulocytes (67% of patients) or platelets (19%), 54% had febrile neutropenia, 31% grade 3/4 asthenia, and 26% abandoned the study due to toxicity. Three toxic deaths occurred. In 57 non-GIST patients objective activity was 45.6% (95% CI, 32 to 58%). Conclusion. At least 4 cycles were tolerated by 71% of patients, most receiving DXR 50 mg/m² plus IFOS 10–12 g/m², with substantial toxicity.

High-dose ifosfamide as second- or third-line chemotherapy in refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients

INTRODUCTION

For patients with refractory bone and soft tissue sarcoma (STS), treatment options have been limited. Ifosfamide is an alkylating agent with well-demonstrated efficacy against STS, and dose-dependent activity. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), progression-free rate (PFR), and median duration of response to high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) as at least second-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced bone sarcoma and STS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty metastatic, unresectable sarcoma patients who were treated with HDI chemotherapy between May 1999 and November 2007 were included in the analysis. In total, 106 cycles (median 3 cycles; range 1-8 cycles) were administered. Twenty-one patients received treatment as second-line chemotherapy, and 9 patients as third-line treatment. HDI was given at a dose of 2 g/m(2) over 3 h, and at a dose of 2 g/m(2) per day; continuous infusion was administered on 6 consecutive days (2 g/m(2)/6 days) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 49 months (range 10-114), median PFS was 2.9 months (range 0.4-9.3) and median overall survival 8.7 months (range 0.4-57.8). The 3- and 6-month PFR were 47% (SE 9.1%) and 20% (SE 7.3%), respectively. Median response duration of HDI was 2.9 months (range 0.7-7.6). Of the 28 evaluable patients, 2 (7%) achieved complete response, 5 (18%) partial response, and 4 (14%) stable disease, and overall disease control was 39%. Two responders out of 7 (28.5%) and 4 patients out of 11 (36%) with controlled disease by HDI had a synovial sarcoma. Two patients were not evaluable because they were switched to another treatment due to ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was seen in 13 (43%) patients, and treatment-related death was observed in one patient.

CONCLUSION

HDI at a total dose of 14 g/m(2) with mesna is still an active salvage regimen, particularly in patients with synovial sarcomas.

Prolonged 14-day continuous infusion of high-dose ifosfamide with an external portable pump: feasibility and efficacy in refractory pediatric sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Ifosfamide is currently used to treat pediatric sarcomas and increasing its dosage may be associated with a better response rate. Prolonged continuous infusion seems an attractive administration modality.

METHODS

Ifosfamide 14 g/m(2) (with mesna 14 g/m(2)) was administered through an ambulatory portable pump over 14 days as a continuous infusion, starting every 3 weeks, in 14 patients with relapsing sarcomas. No growth factors were given.

RESULTS

Acute grade 3 hematological toxicity was observed in only 13/66 cycles and red cell transfusions were given in two patients. Hematuria and dysuria occurred in three cases. The response rate was: five partial responses, five stable disease. The median time to progression was 3 months (range: 2-19 months). The best response rate was seen for synovial sarcoma and Ewing sarcoma.

CONCLUSION

Prolonged 14-day continuous infusion of high-dose ifosfamide is well tolerated. Potentially interesting preliminary responses in pediatric patients already treated with ifosfamide are reported.

Guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

These guidelines were drawn up following a consensus meeting of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group and are intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. The guidelines published by the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) were used as the basis for discussion and adapted according to UK clinical practice and local requirements. Note was also taken of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) improving outcomes guidance (IOG) for people with sarcoma and existing technology appraisals. The guidelines are not intended to challenge NICE guidance but discrepancies may exist where current guidance does not reflect an international standard of care owing to the ever-evolving nature of cancer treatment. It is acknowledged that these guidelines will require updating on a regular basis. An appendix lists the key recommendations which are summarised below. Any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a diagnostic centre and managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Surgical excision followed by post operative radiotherapy is the standard management of high grade limb sarcomas although occasionally amputation remains the only option. Pre-operative treatment with chemotherapy or radiotherapy should be considered for patients with borderline resectable tumours. Isolated limb perfusion may permit limb salvage in some cases where amputation is the only other option. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not routinely recommended but may be considered in certain specific situations. Regular follow up is recommended to assess local control and the development of metastatic disease. Single agent doxorubicin is the standard first line therapy for metastatic disease. Ifosfamide is an alternative if anthracyclines are contraindicated. Combination therapy may be considered in individual patients. Second line agents include ifosfamide, dacarbazine, trabectedin and the combination of gemcitabine + docetaxel. Surgical resection of local recurrence and pulmonary metastases should be considered in individual patients. There is specific guidance on the management of retroperitoneal and uterine sarcomas.

[Multidisciplinary treatment for adult soft tissue sarcoma]

The current standard in local treatment of soft tissue sarcomas has shifted from amputation and similar mutilating resections to more organ- and function-preserving surgery. This was possible through multidisciplinary treatment approaches, particularly those including adjuvant radiation therapy. Adjuvant radiation showed significant improvement in local tumour control after resection with tight margins and in high-risk sarcomas. Unfortunately adjuvant radiation failed to improve overall survival. Perioperative chemotherapies also have not contributed to improvement in the overall prognosis worldwide. Progress may occur when the pathogenesis and molecular profile of specific sarcoma subtypes are better understood, allowing more effective new drugs. One example is the treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour with imatinib, a small molecular kinase inhibitor of the c-kit receptor. Presently the most effective measure to improve the prognosis with soft tissue sarcomas is early patient referral to expert centres, where diagnostic workup and therapy decisions are made on a multidisciplinary basis and updated according to the newest guidelines and study results.

The pharmacologic basis of ifosfamide use in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas

The treatment outcome of patients with locally advanced and metastatic soft tissue sarcomas is poor. Doxorubicin is regarded as standard treatment, but its use is featured by the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. This hinders the administration of this drug at high doses or in combination with, in theory, attractive newly developed targeted drugs, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway inhibitors. The combination of doxorubicin and VEGF pathway inhibitors has been shown to yield an unacceptable high rate of cardiomyopathy. Ifosfamide is the only drug that consistently shows response rates comparable to those of doxorubicin. The lack of cardiotoxicity renders this drug a much more attractive alternative than doxorubicin to be explored at high doses or as part of new drug combinations. This review addresses the clinical pharmacology, metabolism, and present role of ifosfamide in the treatment of locally advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, excluding gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the Ewing-like sarcomas, and other small blue round cell tumors. Furthermore, this review focuses on the anticipated growing role of ifosfamide in the development of new treatment strategies.

Sarcoma

Sarcomas comprise a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal neoplasms. They can be grouped into 2 general categories, soft tissue sarcoma and primary bone sarcoma, which have different staging and treatment approaches. This review includes a discussion of both soft tissue sarcomas (malignant fibrous histiocytoma, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, angiosarcoma, Kaposi sarcoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, aggressive fibromatosis or desmoid tumor, rhabdomyosarcoma, and primary alveolar soft-part sarcoma) and primary bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, giant cell tumor, and chondrosarcoma). The 3 most important prognostic variables are grade, size, and location of the primary tumor. The approach to a patient with a sarcoma begins with a biopsy that obtains adequate tissue for diagnosis without interfering with subsequent optimal definitive surgery. Subsequent treatment depends on the specific type of sarcoma. Because sarcomas are relatively uncommon yet comprise a wide variety of different entities, evaluation by oncology teams who have expertise in the field is recommended. Treatment and follow-up guidelines have been published by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (www.nccn.org).

The "old drug" dacarbazine as a second/third line chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcomas

The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the response rate, progression-free survival and median duration of response to dacarbazine as second/third-line chemotherapy for refractory soft tissue sarcomas. We studied 40 valuable patients with refractory soft tissue sarcomas and confirmed progressive disease (median age 54 years; range 24-73) treated between May 1997 and October 2005: 30 (75%) with metastases, and 23 (57.5%) with grade 3 disease. Dacarbazine was given as second-line chemotherapy to 29 patients (72.5%) every 21 days using three different schedules: dacarbazine 800 mg/m2 on day 1 (26 patients); dacarbazine 400 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 (five patients); and dacarbazine 300 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3 (nine patients). There were no complete responses, three (7.5%) partial responses and five (12.5%) cases of stable disease, for an overall disease control rate of 20%. Median progression-free survival was 2 months and median response duration 9 months. The 3- and 6-month progression-free rates were, respectively, 25% (SE 6.85%) and 20% (SE 6.32%). There were no cases of grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological toxicity. In conclusion, our results suggest that second/third-line therapy with dacarbazine leads to satisfactory disease control in refractory soft tissue sarcomas; its activity seems to be comparable with other treatments, such as high dose ifosfamide or ecteinascidin-743, but it has a better toxicity profile.

Ecteinascidin-743: evidence of activity in advanced, pretreated soft tissue and bone sarcoma patients

Purpose. To evaluate the activity and safety of ecteinascidin (ET-743) in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcoma. Patients or subjects. Eighty-nine patients received ET-743 as a 24-hour continuous infusion at a dose of 900-1500 mug/m(2) every 3 weeks. Results. We observed one complete remission, 5 partial remissions, one minimal response, and 16 patients with a disease stabilization of 6 months or more. The objective response rate was 6.7% and the clinical benefit rate at 3 and 6 months was 37.7% and 23.4%, respectively. Responses were noted in patients with lipo-, leiomyo-, osteo-, and myogenic sarcoma, with a median duration of 9.85 months. Toxicity mainly involved an asymptomatic elevation of transaminases and neutropenia. Estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates were 39.4% and 15.8%. Median overall survival was 8.25 months. Discussion. This retrospective analysis confirms that ET-743 induces objective responses and progression arrest in a clinically relevant proportion of patients.

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination in 133 advanced soft-tissue sarcomas: a retrospective analysis

Advanced soft-tissue sarcomas are usually resistant to cytotoxic agents such as doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Antitumor activity has been observed for gemcitabine and docetaxel combination. We conducted a retrospective study on 133 patients (58 males/75 females) with unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. The median age at diagnosis was 51.7 (18-82), with 76 patients with leiomoyosarcoma and 57 patients with other histological subtypes. The initial localizations were limb (44), uterine (32), retroperitoneal (23) and organs or bone (34). Patients received 900 mg/m2 of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) over 90 min plus 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel (day 8), intravenously every 21 days. Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was well tolerated with an overall response of 18.4% and with no clear statistical difference between leiomyosarcomas and other histological subtypes (24.2% versus 10.4% (p=0.06)). No difference was found between uterine soft-tissue sarcomas versus others. The median overall survival was 12.1 months (1-28). Better overall survival was correlated with leiomyosarcoma (p=0.01) and with the quality of the response, even for patients with stable disease (p<10(-4)). No statistical difference was found for the initial localization. Response to treatment and overall survival were better for patients in World Health Organization (WHO) performance status classification (PS) 0 at baseline versus patients in WHO PS-1, 2 or 3 (p=0.023 and p<10(-4), respectively). Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was tolerable and demonstrated better response and survival for leiomyosarcoma, especially for patients in WHO PS-0 at baseline. For the other histological subtypes, the response was not encouraging, but the survival for patients in response or stable suggests further investigation.

Randomized Phase II Evaluation of 6 g/m2 of Ifosfamide Plus Doxorubicin and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Compared With 12 g/m2 of Ifosfamide Plus Doxorubicin and G-CSF in the Treatment of Poor-Prognosis Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose

The relative value of increasing ifosfamide dose in combination chemotherapy for patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin with high-dose (HD) ifosfamide or standard-dose (SD) ifosfamide in patients with STS.

Patients and Methods

Chemotherapy-naive patients with STS were randomly assigned to receive doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and either SD ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2/d, days 1 through 4) or HD ifosfamide (3.0 g/m2, days 1 through 4) every 21 days. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of metastatic disease. End points were overall survival (OS), 1-year disease-free survival (DFS), and toxicity.

Results

The study group consisted of 79 patients (52 patients with localized disease and 27 patients with metastases). Both groups were well-balanced with respect to known prognostic factors. There was no significant difference in 1-year DFS comparing SD ifosfamide with HD ifosfamide (55% v 52%; P = .81). For SD ifosfamide, 2- and 3-year OS were 73% and 52% versus 57% and 49% for HD ifosfamide (P = .34). The incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia were 49%, 23%, and 10%, respectively, on the SD ifosfamide arm, compared with 88%, 58%, and 63%, respectively, on the HD ifosfamide arm. There were five early deaths, all on the HD ifosfamide arm.

Conclusion

When combined with doxorubicin, HD ifosfamide did not improve 1-year DFS and OS. Toxicity was clearly greater with the HD ifosfamide arm, and lack of outcome differences might be explained by toxicities with HD ifosfamide. These results suggest that HD ifosfamide combination regimens should not be used as first-line therapy for patients with STS.

Phase II study of ecteinascidin-743 in advanced pretreated soft tissue sarcoma patients

PURPOSE

A multicenter phase II study evaluating efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743) in pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received ET-743 1,500 microg/m(2) (24-hour intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks (group 1, 26 patients with one to two prior single agents or one previous combination chemotherapy; group 2, 28 patients with three or more prior single agents or two or more previous combination chemotherapies). Results Patients (30 women, 24 men) had a median age of 48 years (range, 22 to 71 years); 41% had leiomyosarcoma (eight of 22 of uterine origin), a median of two involved organs (range, one to four), and 93% had documented progressive disease at study entry. Patients received a median of three cycles (range, one to 20); 28% received six or more cycles. Fifty-two patients were assessable for response (WHO criteria): two partial responses, four minor responses, and nine with stable disease (> or = 6 months). Three patients were rendered tumor free after surgery. Median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (range, 0.69 to 17.90 months); 24% of patients were progression free at 6 months. Median survival was 12.8 months, with 30% of patients alive at 2 years. Four patients withdrew because of treatment-related toxicity. Two treatment-related deaths occurred (renal failure and febrile neutropenia, and rhabdomyolysis and decompensated cirrhosis, respectively) that were probably related to protocol eligibility violations. Reversible grade 3 to 4 AST or ALT occurred in 50% of patients and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia occurred in 61% of patients, with six episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nausea, vomiting, and asthenia were prevalent but mild and manageable.

CONCLUSION

With a 4% overall response rate (95% CI, 0.5 to 12.8) and an 11% rate of third-party-verified tumor regression (overall response rate + minor response), ET-743 has a 24% 6-month disease progression control rate, confirming evidence of antitumoral activity and a manageable safety profile in patients experiencing disease progression with pretreated soft tissue sarcoma.

Sequential dose-dense doxorubicin and ifosfamide for advanced soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Combinations of high-dose ifosfamide (IF; 10-12 g/m2) plus doxorubicin (DX; 50-90 mg/m2) have been administered to patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) in an attempt to improve therapeutic efficacy. Although these combination regimens appear to yield higher response rates than do standard-dose regimens, they also are associated with significant hematologic toxicity, despite the administration of hematopoietic growth factor support. As a potentially less toxic alternative, the authors designed a sequential, dose-dense schedule of DX and IF and explored its feasibility and toxicity, as well as patient compliance with the schedule, in a Phase II trial.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic ASTS were to receive DX at 30 mg/m2 per day for 3 consecutive days once every 2 weeks for 3 cycles followed by IF at 12.5 g/m2 delivered by continuous infusion over 5 days once every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor was administered subcutaneously for 7 days beginning 24 hours after the completion of each DX or IF cycle. Additional IF cycles were allowed if an objective response was achieved.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled in the trial. Three were ineligible, 9 had locally advanced disease, and 48 had metastatic disease. At the completion of therapy, the mean dose intensities for DX and IF were 40 mg/m2 per week and 3.87 g/m2 per week, respectively. Sixty-six percent of patients completed the regimen projected by the protocol. Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, febrile neutropenia, and stomatitis occurred in 46%, 24%, and 27% of patients, respectively. Twenty of 53 assessable patients (38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25-51%) achieved objective responses, with a median time to progression of 24 weeks (95% CI, 18-30 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential administration of dose-dense DX and high-dose IF is feasible and exhibits an acceptable hematologic toxicity profile and a level of activity that is within the range described for schedules that combine high-dose IF with an anthracycline.

Results of randomised studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) with two different ifosfamide regimens in first- and second-line chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens of ifosfamide in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients given as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Two different schedules of ifosfamide were investigated in a randomised manner: Ifosfamide was given either at a dose of 5 g/m(2) over 24 h (5 g/m(2)/1 day), every 3 weeks or at a dose of 3 g/m(2) per day, administered over 4 h on three consecutive days (3 g/m(2)/3 days), every 3 weeks. Both schedules were given as first-line or second-line chemotherapy. A total of 182 patients was entered, 103 in first- and 79 in second-line, of whom 8 patients were ineligible, 5 in the first- and 3 in the second-line study. Most patients had a leiomyosarcoma, 46 of the 98 in the first-line and 34 of the 76 in the second-line. The two study arms were well balanced in both the first- and second-lines with respect to sex, age and performance status. In first-line treatment, 5 g/m(2)/1 day yielded five partial responses (PR) (Response Rate (RR) 10%), versus 12 PR (RR 25%) for the 3 g/m(2)/3 days. As second-line treatment, the 24-h infusion yielded: one CR and one PR (RR 6%) and the 3-day schedule one CR and two PR (RR 8%). Survival did not differ between the two regimens. The major World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered were: leucopenia in 19% of all courses in the first-line and 32% in the second-line with the 5 g/m(2)/1 day, while for the 3 g/m(2)/3 days schedule the rates were 57 and 63% respectively. Grade 3 or 4 infections were seen in 4% of patients treated with 5 g/m(2)/1 day first-line and 10% of patients given 3 g/m(2)/3 days, both as first- and second-lines. No such infections were seen in patients receiving 5 g/m(2)/1 day as second line treatment. In advanced soft-tissue sarcomas in the first-line, ifosfamide 3 g/m(2), given over 4 h on three consecutive days, is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity while the 5 g/m(2) over 24 hours schedule resulted in a disappointing response rate.

The use of chemotherapy in soft-tissue sarcomas

The treatment of advanced soft-tissue sarcomas is often palliative, although a subset of patients may be cured or have a long disease-free interval. This paper reviews the historical data over 30 years of treatment that has led to the use of ifosfamide and doxorubicin as the mainstay in the treatment of metastatic disease. These treatments have a high toxicity, relative to other chemotherapeutic regimens, with median response durations on the order of months. Agents developed in the last few years, whose role in the treatment of sarcomas is still evolving, are discussed as well. Finally, we discuss the role of chemotherapy in combination with surgery and radiation in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings.

Docetaxel as rescue medication in anthracycline- and ifosfamide-resistant locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma not amenable to curative surgery has a dismal prognosis. Aggressive treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide represents the current therapeutic mainstay in these patients, most of whom succumb to relapses. Thus, the efficacy of subsequent therapeutic approaches has to be weighed against toxicity caused by palliative treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma refractory to treatment with anthracyclines and ifosfamide were enrolled into the present phase II study. Patients were assigned to receive docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 every three weeks. In case of severe toxicity, patients were switched to a weekly schedule of docetaxel (40 mg/m2).

RESULTS

A total of 106 cycles (80% at the scheduled 100 mg/m2 dose level) were administered in 27 patients. Partial response was observed in 4 (15%) patients and 4 (15%) patients experienced disease stabilization. Median progression free survival and overall survival were 2.4 (range: 0.9-23.9) and 7.7 (range: 1.0-44.3) months, respectively. Upon renewed progression, three patients initially responsive to treatment with docetaxel were successfully reinduced by treatment with docetaxel. The safety profile of docetaxel was tolerable and the administration mostly manageable on an outpatient basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that docetaxel represents an efficacious and tolerable treatment in a minority of patients refractory to standard treatment. There is a need for better identification of patients most likely to benefit from salvage treatment with docetaxel.

Effect of high-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A multicentre phase II study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

In this phase II study the effect of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) given as a 3-day continuous infusion at a dose of 12 g/m2 repeated every 4 weeks with adequate mesna protection and hydration was evaluated in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A total of 124 patients entered the trial of which 10 were ineligible. HDI was given both as first-line and second-line chemotherapy. Median age was 46 years (19-66 years). Median World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 1 (0-1). Fifty two per cent of the patients were males. The predominant histology was leiomyosarcoma (33%). A maximum of six cycles was given. At the time of analysis 55 patients have died. The partial response (PR) rate was 16%. The median time to progression was 15 weeks. 8 of the 18 responding patients (44%) had synovial sarcomas, whereas only 5% of the patients having leiomyosarcomas responded. The grade 3 + 4 haematological toxicity encountered was neutrophils in 78% and platelets in 12%. The major grade 3 + 4 non-haematological toxicities encountered were febrile neutropenia in 39%, infection in 20%, and acute renal failure in 4%. In conclusion, it is possible to administer HDI on a multicentre basis, but the toxicity is substantial. HDI given as a continuous infusion at this dose cannot be recommended as the standard treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas, even in selected patients.

Saturable metabolism of continuous high-dose ifosfamide with mesna and GM-CSF: a pharmacokinetic study in advanced sarcoma patients. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacology, toxicity and activity of high-dose ifosfamide mesna +/- GM-CSF administered by a five-day continuous infusion at a total ifosfamide dose of 12-18 g/m2 in adult patients with advanced sarcomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1991 and October 1992 32 patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma were entered the study. Twenty-seven patients were pretreated including twenty-three with prior ifosfamide at less than 8 g/m2 total dose/cycle. In 25 patients (27 cycles) extensive pharmacokinetic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for ifosfamide increased linearly with dose while the AUC's of the metabolites measured in plasma by thin-layer chromatography did not increase with dose, particularly that of the active metabolite isophosphoramide mustard. Furthermore the AUC of the inactive carboxymetabolite did not increase with dose. Interpatient variability of pharmacokinetic parameters was high. Dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression at 18 g/m2 total dose with grade 4 neutropenia in five of six patients and grade 4 thrombocytopenia in four of six patients. Therefore the maximum tolerated dose was considered to be 18 g/m2 total dose. There was one CR and eleven PR in twenty-nine evaluable patients (overall response rate 41%).

CONCLUSION

Both the activation and inactivation pathways of ifosfamide are non-linear and saturable at high-doses although the pharmacokinetics of the parent drug itself are dose linear. Ifosfamide doses greater than 14-16 g/m2 per cycle appear to result in a relative decrease of the active metabolite isophosphoramide mustard. These data suggest a dose-dependent saturation or even inhibition of ifosfamide metabolism by increasing high dose ifosfamide and suggest the need for further metabolic studies.

Dose-intensive first-line chemotherapy with epirubicin and continuous infusion ifosfamide in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a phase II study

This phase II study was designed to verify the activity and safety of an intensive epirubicin/ifosfamide schedule in untreated soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients by using both the agents at the identified maximal tolerated doses. 39 adult patients were treated with epirubicin at 55 mg/m2, on days 1 and 2 (total dose per cycle 110 mg/m2) combined with ifosfamide at 2.5 g/m2 days 1-4 (total dose per cycle 10 g/m2), with equidose mesna uroprotection and G-CSF support. Treatment was given on an ambulatory basis, at 3-week intervals. The overall objective response (OR) rate was 59% (95% confidence interval, CI, 43-72%), with 5 complete responses (13%) at 18 partial responses (46%); 12 partial responders were rendered disease-free following surgery. The median survival time was 19 months, being 23 and 13 months, respectively, for responding and non-responding patients. The median time to response was 40 days (range 21-60). Treatment-related toxicity was overall acceptable. The OR of 59% was the highest ever reported in our consecutive studies in advanced STS, confirming that improved therapeutic efficacy can be obtained with intensified regimens in such a disease; both the response duration and survival were also longer. The observed activity proved to be interesting with regard to the high response rate in the lung (86%), as well as the proportion of patients rendered disease-free by early surgery after the achievement of a partial response (55%). Both these findings may be important in the multimodality approach to patients with lesions potentially resectable for cure.

Phase II trial of first-line high-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas of the adult: a study of the Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS)

BACKGROUND

The agent Ifosfamide (IFOS) is active against soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and patients who progress to IFOS at doses < or = 10 g/m2 show remissions when exposed to high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) (i.e., doses > 10 g/m2), which supports a dose-response relationship for this drug. Because of a lack of first-line studies in adult STS patients, we decided to test the activity and toxicity of HDI in a phase II trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. IFOS was administered at a dose of 14 g/m2 by continuous infusion over six days every four weeks. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) at 5 micrograms/kg/day for 10 consecutive days was systematically administered after an episode of neutropenic fever or a delay in hematologic recovery. Patients were treated until progression or the occurrence of severe toxicity, and surgical rescue was attempted when possible.

RESULTS

Six pathology-established complete remissions and 11 partial remissions were observed in 45 assessable patients with a response rate of 37.7% (95% CI: 25.5%-50%). Grade 3-4 toxicity (% of cycles) was noted by hemoglobin (17%), leukocyte (75%), granulocyte (75%) and platelet (13%) counts in 158 evaluable cycles. GM-CSF was administered to 28 patients, and 25 suffered one or more episodes of neutropenic fever. Renal toxicity was mild and reversible with some degree of tubular and glomerular dysfunction detected in up to 60% of patients. Grade 3 CNS toxicity was observed in 32% of patients but only one required interruption of therapy. Sixty-four per cent of the patients had asthenia grade 2-3 and 20% were excluded from the study due to excessive toxicity. There was one treatment-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

HDI is an active drug in first-line therapy against adult STS. Different administration schedules should be evaluated in an attempt to improve its therapeutic index.