Weekly docetaxel plus gemcitabine or vinorelbine in refractory advanced breast cancer patients: a parallel dose-finding study. Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG)

Increased risk of high-grade hemorrhage in cancer patients treated with gemcitabine: a meta-analysis of 20 randomized controlled trials

Purpose

Gemcitabine, a third-generation anticancer agent, has been shown to be active in several solid tumors. High-grade hemorrhage (grade≥3) has been reported with this drug, although the overall risk remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the incidence and risk of high-grade hemorrhage associated with gemcitabine.

Methods

Pubmed was searched for articles published from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2012. Eligible studies included prospective randomized controlled phase II and III trials evaluating gemcitabine-based vs non-gemcitabine-based therapy in patients with solid tumors. Data on high-grade hemorrhage were extracted. Overall incidence rates, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of included trials.

Results

A total of 6433 patients from 20 trials were included. Among patients treated with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, the overall incidence of high-grade hemorrhage was 1.7% (95%CI: 0.9–3.1%), and the RR of high-grade hemorrhage was 2.727 (95%CI: 1.581–4.702, p<0.001). Exploratory subgroup analysis revealed the highest RR of hemorrhage in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (RR: 3.234; 95%CI, 1.678–6.233; p<0.001), phase II trials (RR 7.053, 95%CI: 1.591–31.27; p = 0.01), trials reported during 2006–2012 (RR: 3.750; 95%CI: 1.735–8.108, p<0.001) and gemcitabine used as single agent (RR 7.48; 95%CI: 0.78–71.92, p = 0.081).

Conclusion

Gemcitabine is associated with a significant increase risk of high-grade hemorrhage in patients with solid tumors when compared with non-gemcitabine-based therapy.

A systematic review of vinorelbine for the treatment of breast cancer

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of vinorelbine-based chemotherapy in different settings for the treatment of breast cancer. We performed a computerized search using combinations of the following keywords: "breast cancer", "breast neoplasms", "trial", "vinorelbine" and "navelbine". A total of 20 trials were included in this analysis, with a total of 5,080 patients accrued. Taxane was associated with enhanced overall survival (OS; p = 0.027) and response rate (RR; p = 0.037) as compared with vinorelbine in monotherapy, but did not show significantly favored progression-free survival (PFS; p = 0.136). Vinorelbine alone was equivalent to fluoropyrimidine treatment in RR (p = 0.79) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. For vinorelbine-combined regimens, the analysis showed that the vinorelbine group gave similar results as other regimens for OS (p = 0.849) and PFS (p = 0.143). The RR of vinorelbine-combined regimens was slightly better than that of the other regimens (OR, 1.17), but the difference was not statistically significant. In neoadjuvant setting, vinorelbine treatment was as active as AC (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) or DAC (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, docetaxel) regimens with respect to RR (p = 0.76) and pathologic complete response (pCR; p = 0.77), but showed lower occurrence of grade 3/4 adverse effects. The analysis also demonstrated that vinorelbine-containing therapy is effective as adjuvant, front-line or salvage therapy of metastatic breast cancer, even for patients who were previously treated with anthracyclines or taxanes.

Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequent tumor among women worldwide and is the second cause of cancer-related mortality in the US. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) accounts for less than 10% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients and about 30% of early breast cancer patients will develop recurrent, advanced, or metastatic disease. It remains an incurable illness and the primary goal of its management is palliative. Several agents are active for the first-line treatment of MBC. The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, represent the standard of care for the treatment of these patients. Among the various schedules, docetaxel can be administered weekly, achieving similar efficacy results with lower toxicity compared with conventional schedules. Weekly docetaxel (25–40 mg/m²) has been widely tested in several phase I and II studies both as a single agent and in multichemotherapy regimens, reaching overall response rates ranging from 26% and 86% or 20% and 73% with docetaxel alone or in combination, respectively, depending on doses, associations, and line of treatment. Overall, published data support the administration of weekly docetaxel for the treatment of MBC patients even if data from phase III randomized trials are still lacking.

Bi-weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine regimen in her-2-negative and anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients: a multicenter phase II trial

PURPOSE

Bi-weekly gemcitabine (G) in combination with docetaxel (D) is an effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with adjuvant/neoadjuvant anthracyclines containing regimens with a good toxicity profile. In the present phase II study, we investigated the activity of the same regimen as first-line treatment.

METHODS

Women with breast cancer pretreated in adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting with anthracyclines received bi-weekly G (1,250 mg/m² days 1, 15) and D (50 mg/m² days 1, 15) every 28 days with restaging after 3 and 6 cycles.

RESULTS

Overall 42 patients were enrolled. Median age is 48 years (range, 31-71 years). Eight patients (19%) achieved complete responses, 18 (43%) partial responses for an overall response rate (ORR) of 62%; five patients (12%) obtained stable disease (SD), and 8 (19%) patients had progressive disease (PD). After a median 17-month follow-up, the median time to disease progression was 12 months (95% CI, 3-26 months) and the median survival time was 27 months (95% CI, 4-57 months). No grade 4 toxicity was seen except in one patient who developed a grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 toxicities were leukopenia (2%), neutropenia (14%), anemia (2%), nausea and vomiting (2%), diarrhea (2%), asthenia (2%), and skin toxicity (12%).

CONCLUSION

The GD bi-weekly regimen is well tolerated and active as first line in anthracyclines-pretreated women with MBC. It appears as an interesting alternative compared to a 3-week schedule whenever hematological toxicity is the main clinical concern.

Phase III study of gemcitabine plus docetaxel compared with capecitabine plus docetaxel for anthracycline-pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic breast cancer who are pretreated with anthracyclines frequently receive taxane-based combinations. This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-docetaxel (GD) with capecitabine-docetaxel (CD) in advanced breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to GD (G 1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8; D 75 mg/m(2) day 1) or CD (C 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1 through 14; D 75 mg/m(2) day 1) every 21 days. Comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary objective.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were balanced between arms (N = 305). Median PFS was 8.05 months (95% CI, 6.60 to 8.71) for GD and 7.98 (95% CI, 6.93 to 8.77) for CD (log-rank P = .121). Overall response rate (ORR) was 32% in both arms, and overall survival (OS) was not different between arms (P = .983). Time to treatment failure (TTF; defined as discontinuation, progressive disease, death as a result of any cause, or the start of a new anticancer therapy) was superior in the GD arm (P = .059). Hematologic toxicity was similar in both arms, except for grades 3 to 4 leukopenia (GD, 78%; CD, 66%; P = .025) and transfusions (GD, 17%; CD, 7%; P = .0051). Grades 3 to 4 diarrhea, mucositis, and hand-and-foot syndrome were significantly higher in the CD arm. Fewer patients in the GD arm discontinued because of drug-related adverse events (13% v 27% in CD; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

No difference was observed between GD and CD arms in PFS, ORR, and OS. TTF was longer in the GD arm. These findings, combined with a nonhematologic toxicity profile that favors GD over approved doses of CD, suggest that gemcitabine may be a better option than capecitabine in combination with docetaxel in this clinical setting.

Improvement of Safety Profile of Docetaxel by Weekly Administration in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

This is a retrospective cohort study on the safety and efficacy profiles of weekly docetaxel at varying doses in patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-five anthracycline-pretreated patients received docetaxel administered on a weekly basis, as a one-hour infusion, at various dosage levels (25, 30, 35, 40 mg/m2) depending on their baseline Karnofsky index. Each 8-week cycle consisted of 6 weeks of drug infusion, followed by a 2-week rest period.

RESULTS

Of the 25 patients investigated, none achieved complete response (CR), while 9 patients showed partial response (PR), which corresponds to an overall response rate of 36%. Five patients (20%) maintained stable disease (SD), whereas 11 patients (44%) suffered tumor progression (PD) during treatment. Clinical response (defined as PR+SD) was achieved in 14 patients (56%). Median time to progression was 231 days (95% CI, 187-275). The baseline Karnofsky index was 87% +/- 9% (range: 70-100). Patients pretreated with anthracyclines only tended to have a better response than anthracycline/paclitaxel-pretreated patients (n = 6, p = 0.054). Higher dosages were associated with neurotoxicity, skin/nail toxicity, leukopenia, nausea/vomiting, fatigue/asthenia, peripheral edema, but not with diarrhea and alopecia. The cumulative dose per patient was largest for a weekly docetaxel dosage of 35 mg/m2 and almost as large for 30 mg/m2.

CONCLUSION

Balancing toxicity vs. efficacy/cumulative dosage delivered, our results support weekly administration of docetaxel at dosages of 30-35 mg/m2 in metastatic breast cancer. Response in patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes may be poorer than in those pretreated with anthracyclines only.

Weekly administration of docetaxel and paclitaxel in metastatic or advanced breast cancer

The taxanes docetaxel (Taxotere; Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bridgewater, NJ, http://www.aventispharma-us.com) and paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, http://www.bms.com) have significant clinical activity in metastatic breast cancer. A number of clinical trials have evaluated the tolerability and efficacy of weekly taxane administration to optimize the benefit-to-risk ratio in metastatic breast cancer. Single-agent studies with docetaxel and paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer show clinically significant antitumor activity even in advanced, heavily pretreated, resistant, and/or refractory disease. This activity is also evident with taxane-based combination regimens. Severe hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities are infrequent, with other toxicities noted based on the dose and weekly regimen selected. Weekly docetaxel and paclitaxel regimens represent valuable therapeutic options for women with metastatic breast cancer and have entered evaluation as part of adjuvant therapy for this disease.

Biweekly docetaxel-irinotecan treatment with filgrastim support is highly active in antracycline-Paclitaxel-refractory breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and activity of combination treatment with docetaxel (DTX) and irinotecan (CPT-11), given together every other week, combined with filgrastim support, in anthracycline- and paclitaxel-pretreated breast cancer (BC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced BC patients pretreated with anthracycline- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were eligible. DTX (80 mg/m2) and CPT-11 (100 mg/m2) were given biweekly with filgrastim support (300 microg/day on days 4-7).

RESULTS

Fifty patients (48 with metastatic and 2 with locally advanced cancer) were enrolled, with a total of 318 cycles being delivered. Thirty-one patients had visceral localizations. All patients had received epirubicin plus paclitaxel, with or without cisplatin, as front-line treatment for advanced disease. Overall, fatigue and diarrhea were the main chemotherapy-related toxicities in this study, being severe in 10 (20%) and 4 (8%) patients. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 18 (36%) and 6 (12%) patients, respectively. Red blood cell transfusions were required in 4 patients. A total of 32 objective responses were registered (overall response rate, ORR = 64%, 95% confidence interval = 49-77%), including 8 complete responses (16%). An additional 8 patients showed stable disease. After a median follow-up of 18 (range 4-29) months, 30 patients were still alive, and 19 were progression free; median progression-free and overall survivals were 10 and 23 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Biweekly DTX/CPT-11 with G-CSF support is a well-tolerated and highly effective approach in anthracycline-/paclitaxel-pretreated patients. The very promising ORR and survival outcome observed in this subset of patients with a poor prognosis suggest that this regimen might play a major role in the management of this disease.

Weekly combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer: a phase I/II study

OBJECTIVE

A phase I/II study was carried out to determine the recommended dose (RD) and to assess the efficacy and safety of a weekly docetaxel-vinorelbine combination in advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients.

METHODS

Twenty-four female patients with histologically proven ABC received intravenous vinorelbine (20 min) followed by intravenous docetaxel (1 h) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4-week cycle. Starting doses were 20 mg/m2 docetaxel and 15 mg/m2 vinorelbine.

RESULTS

Patients had a median age of 62 years (range 38-74 years), and 92% had performance status 0-1. The most common sites of metastases were the lungs (32%), liver (29%) and bone (14%). Seventy-one percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The RDs of docetaxel and vinorelbine were 20 and 15 mg/m2, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia-induced dose delay and febrile neutropenia. The response rate at the RD was 43%. All responses were seen in non-pretreated patients. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 80% of patients, 3 of whom experienced febrile neutropenia and died as a possible consequence of neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

This docetaxel-vinorelbine combination as first-line therapy yields a response rate similar to that of single-agent docetaxel as second-line therapy. However, given the high rate of myelotoxicity, higher doses are not feasible.

Oral bioavailability of docetaxel in combination with OC144-093 (ONT-093)

OBJECTIVE

Docetaxel given orally as monotherapy results in low bioavailability of <10%. Previous studies have indicated that the intestinal efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp) prevents uptake from the gut resulting in low systemic exposure to docetaxel. The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of enhancement of the oral uptake of docetaxel on combination with orally administered OC144-093, a potent P-gp inhibitor. Furthermore, the safety of combined treatment was determined and whether known functional genetic polymorphisms of the MDR1 gene could be associated with variability in docetaxel pharmacokinetics was also investigated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A proof of concept study was carried out in 12 patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients were randomized to receive one course of 100 mg oral docetaxel combined with 500 mg OC144-093 followed 2 weeks later by a second i.v. course of docetaxel at a flat dose of 100 mg, without OC144-093, or vice versa. This was followed by standard i.v. docetaxel treatment if indicated.

RESULTS

The apparent relative oral bioavailability of docetaxel was 26+/-8%. Orally administered docetaxel combined with oral OC144-093 resulted in a Cmax of 415+/-255 ng ml(-1), an AUC0-infinity of 844+/-753 ng h ml(-1) and kel of 0.810+/-0.296 h(-1). These values differed significantly from those following i.v. administration of docetaxel, with a Cmax of 2124+/-1054 ng ml(-1), an AUC0-infinity of 2571+/-1598 ng h ml(-1) and a kel of 1.318+/-0.785 h(-1) (P=0.003, P=0.006, P=0.016). The study medication was well tolerated and most of the adverse events possibly or probably related to OC144-093 and docetaxel were of CTC grade 1 and 2. One patient had a homozygous 3435T/T mutation, which is associated with low intestinal P-gp expression, and two other patients had a homozygous mutation on exon 21.

CONCLUSION

The relative apparent bioavailability of 26% was most likely caused by a significant effect of OC144-093 on the oral uptake of docetaxel. Large intrapatient and interpatient (pharmacokinetic) variation was found after oral as well as after i.v. administration of docetaxel. Higher plasma levels were observed after 100 mg i.v. docetaxel than after 100 mg oral docetaxel plus 500 mg oral OC144-093. The safety of the oral combination was good. More patients should be evaluated to determine the effect of P-gp single nucleotide polymorphisms on oral pharmacokinetic values of docetaxel.

Novel association with gemcitabine and docetaxel as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines: Results of a multicenter phase II study1 1On behalf of Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale

The goals of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the gemcitabine/docetaxel combination in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines. Fifty-three patients with metastatic breast cancer who had failed or relapsed after anthracycline-based chemotherapy entered the study and were evaluable. Patients received gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) days 1 and 8) and docetaxel (80 mg/m(2) day 8), every 3 weeks. The regimen was generally well tolerated with good feasibility. A complete response occurred in six patients (9.4%) and partial response in 23 (43.4%) for an overall response rate of 53% (95% confidence interval, 38.9% to 66.7%). Median survival rate was 70%; and the duration of response, time to progression, and overall survival were 6, 7.5, and 16.5 months, respectively. We conclude that the gemcitabine/docetaxel combination constitutes a manageable and tolerable combination as salvage chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer and may represent a valid treatment option in patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

Biweekly docetaxel and vinorelbine in anthracycline-resistant metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter phase II study

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of a biweekly combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines. Eligible patients (n = 49) with MBC received vinorelbine, 25 mg/m2, followed by docetaxel, 60 mg/m2. Cycles were repeated every 14 days for a total of 8 planned cycles. Response rate was evaluated every 4 cycles. All 49 patients were evaluable for safety and 44 for efficacy. Vinorelbine plus docetaxel resulted in an overall response rate of 45% (CI 95%: 31-60) with 2 (4%) complete responses and 18 (41%) partial responses. Patients with visceral metastasis achieved a lower response rate than those without (33% versus 60%, p = 0.044). Time to progression was 11.0 months (CI 95%: 8.6-13.5), and median overall survival was 12.7 months (CI 95%: 9.0-16.4). The most common grade III to IV hematologic adverse events was neutropenia (65% of patients). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 9 cycles (3%) and in 7 patients (14%). Grade III to IV nonhematologic toxicity was rare. Biweekly combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine is an effective and well-tolerated regimen in anthracycline-resistant MBC.

Synergistic effect of sequential administration of mitoguazone (MGBG) and gemcitabine in treating tissue cultured human breast cancer cells and mammary rat tumors

Modulation of cancer chemotherapeutic drugs has been attempted to increase efficacy and overcome resistance to the chemotherapeutic agent. Studies have shown schedule-dependent interactions in combined use of chemotherapeutic drugs. Mitoguazone (MGBG), an old drug with possible modulating activity, was used in combination with gemcitabine, a relatively new cancer drug, in treating tissue cultured human breast cancer cells and mammary rat tumors. Tissue cultured BOT-2 cancer cells were first treated with varying concentrations of gemcitabine and MGBG, independently. Combinations of the two drugs were then used with different scheduled administrations. Marked synergistic activity was found between gemcitabine and MGBG when the MGBG was given first, followed by gemcitabine 24 hours later. A non-toxic dose of MGBG enhanced the toxicity of gemcitabine by eight orders of magnitude using MTT assays in the tissue cultured human breast cancer cell study. The sequential administration of MGBG and gemcitabine also increased the survival rate of rats bearing mammary tumors in our pilot animal study.

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with refractory malignancies

BACKGROUND

A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination.

METHODS

Docetaxel and gemcitabine were administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The dose levels of docetaxel and gemcitabine were as follows: Level I, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level II, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level III, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); Level IV, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); and Level V, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

Thirty-three eligible patients were entered. The diagnoses were as follows: Eleven patients had nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, 3 patients had carcinoma of the bladder, 3 patients had renal carcinoma, 2 patients had adrenal carcinoma, 5 patients had unknown primary tumors, and 9 patients had miscellaneous malignancies. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range, 0-1). Five patients were treated at Dose Levels I and II, 6 patients were treated at Dose Levels III and V, and 11 patients were treated at Dose Level IV. Grade 3-4 toxicities during Cycle I included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, occurred in three of six patients at Dose Level V. The combination of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) (Dose Level IV) was determined as the MTD and was the recommended Phase II dose. Two patients had a partial response: one patient with bladder carcinoma (Dose Level II) and one patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (Dose Level III).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine were well tolerated. Further studies using this combination are planned, including a Phase II trial in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Combination chemotherapy of the taxanes and antimetabolites: its use and limitations

In an effort to improve response rates of chemotherapy, taxanes have been combined with other cytotoxic agents such as antimetabolites. However, the use of some of these combinations in patients has been restricted by severe toxicity. The significance of the sequence of drug administration in combining methotrexate (MTX) and taxanes was recognised in in vitro studies, showing synergistic effects for the sequence of MTX followed by paclitaxel, and antagonism for exposure in the reverse order. A possible explanation might be an MTX-induced synchronisation of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle, after which cells are more susceptible for the cytotoxic action of taxanes. Clinical studies using this sequence were hampered by severe neutropenia and mucositis at relatively low doses of both drugs. As no pharmacokinetic interactions were observed, the excess of toxicity may have been due to sequence-dependent synergistic actions on bone marrow and mucosa. In contrast, and confusingly, in vitro studies on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and taxanes indicate that 5-FU preceeding or simultaneously given to paclitaxel impairs cytotoxicity as compared with paclitaxel monotherapy, while the reverse sequence results in additive or synergistic cytotoxicity. While almost all clinical studies have used the sequence of a taxane followed by 5-FU, various schedules appeared feasible and effective. The combination of a 5-FU analogue, capecitabine and taxanes was supported by in vitro data. A large phase III trial confirmed the feasibility and superior efficacy of this combination in breast cancer patients relapsing after an anthracycline. Conflicting results exist on the benefit of combining gemcitabine and taxanes in tumour cell lines. Although the accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) in mononuclear cells was significantly higher with an increasing dose of paclitaxel, no pharmacokinetic interactions for both agents were noticed. A pharmacokinetic analysis of the gemcitabine-docetaxel combination therapy has not been published in detail. Despite numerous trials, so far no optimum schedule has been established. Regarding data on actually delivered dose intensities, a 2- or 3-weekly cycle seems favourable and feasible. However, possible severe pulmonary toxicity warrants cautious monitoring of patients treated with this combination. Different outcomes of preclinical and clinical studies reveal that combining two chemotherapeutic agents is not simply a matter of putting antitumour activities together. Drug interaction may result in synergism, not only of efficacy but also of toxic side-effects. Adding two drugs may also implicate antagonism in drug efficacy due to unwanted interference in cytotoxicity or pharmacokinetics. For agents acting at a specific phase of the cell cycle, the sequence of administration may determine the efficacy and toxicity of a combination therapy. Because of an observed discrepancy between in vitro data and clinical studies, we would like to emphasise the need for adequate dose-finding clinical trials together with pharmacokinetic data analysis before examining any new combination chemotherapy in more detail in phase II studies.

Weekly vinorelbine is an effective palliative regimen after failure with anthracyclines and taxanes in metastatic breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no gold standard for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma who have experienced failure with anthracyclines and taxanes. A biologic rationale suggests that the mechanism of taxane resistance could be because of an excess of depolymerized tubulin that could enhance sensitivity to vinorelbine. The objective of the study was to assess the tolerance and efficiency of weekly vinorelbine in metastatic breast carcinoma after failure with taxanes.

METHODS

Patients with measurable disease, a World Health Organization performance status of less than 3 and a life expectancy longer than 3 months were eligible. Persistent taxane-induced neuropathy higher than Grade 1 was an exclusion criterion. The initial planned dose was 30 mg/m(2)/week on an outpatient basis without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Neutrophil and platelet counts of 1.0 and 80 g/L, respectively, were required before each new injection; otherwise vinorelbine was delayed for 7 days with a dose reduction of 5 mg/m(2) at the second episode. The dose also was reduced if Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred. If the adverse event persisted or if the delay exceeded 14 days between 2 injections given at a dose of 20 mg/m(2), vinorelbine was definitively discontinued.

RESULTS

Between November 1997 and March 1999, 40 patients with a median age of 49 (range, 39-69) were enrolled. All of them had previously received anthracyclines and taxanes. Because of the delays in neutrophil recovery, the median dose intensity did not exceed 22.5 mg/m(2)/week (range, 11.25-30), and the initial planned dose of 30 mg/m(2)/week appeared unfeasible without G-CSF. The starting dose therefore was 25 mg/m(2)/week after the first 6 patients. Neutropenia led to fever in only three patients. Other severe toxicities were Grade 2-3 neuropathy (n = 5), Grade 2-3 ileus (n = 7), Grade 3 anemia (n = 4), and Grade 3 sepsis (n = 1). Objective responses were observed in 10 of 40 patients (25%), 7 of whom had visceral metastases and 4 who were refractory to taxanes (including 2 patients with liver involvement > 50%). The median time to failure was 6 months (range, 4-12) for responding patients. Disease stabilization was achieved in 9 patients (23%) for a median duration of 5 months (range, 4-6). The median survival duration for the whole population was 6 months (range, 2-18+).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly vinorelbine is an active salvage therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma after failure with anthracyclines and taxanes, even in patients with taxane-refractory metastatic breast carcinoma. This confirms that vinorelbine and taxanes are not cross-resistant.

Combination chemotherapy with docetaxel plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer patients with prior exposure to anthracyclines

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anti-tumor activity and tolerance of docetaxel plus vinorelbine in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients previously treated with anthracyclines.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with MBC were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (subsequently reduced to 60 mg/m2) plus vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 (subsequently reduced to 24 mg/m2). both on day 1, every 3 weeks, for a maximum of six cycles. All patients had previously received anthracyclines as adjuvant treatment (< 12 months disease-free interval) or first-line therapy for MBC. Thirty-seven patients had received at least one prior regimen for MBC. Twenty-five patients had prior high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell rescue. Thirty patients had multiple metastatic sites. Liver and lung disease were the predominant metastatic site in 31 patients.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were assessable for response. Nineteen patients achieved a partial response and four a complete response (overall response rate, 46%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 32%-60%). Fourteen patients (28%) had stable disease on treatment. Median Kaplan-Meier estimated progression-free and duration of response times are 21 and 29 weeks. Median survival time is 47 weeks. Hematological dose-limiting toxicity, prompted a 20% dose reduction for both drugs after the first thirteen patients were treated. Neutropenia > or = grade 3 occurred in nineteen (34%) patients, neutropenic fever in 15 (7) courses, and mucositis > or = grade 3 in 6 (3%) courses.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of docetaxel plus vinorelbine on day 1 every 3 weeks is feasible and active in MBC patients with prior anthracycline exposure. This regimen is safe, well-tolerated and convenient for the patients.

Unexpected severe myelotoxicity of gemcitabine in pretreated breast cancer patients

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapeutic agent with proven antitumor effects in pancreatic and non-small cell lung cancer; however, studies establishing the definite significance in other solid tumors are still in progress. We herein present three female patients with advanced breast cancer who received gemcitabine as salvage chemotherapy. Gemcitabine at a dose of 1250 mg/m2 was scheduled for days 1, 8 and 15 with a subsequent rest for 1 week. However, within 1 week after the very first administration of gemcitabine myelotoxicity WHO grade IV occurred in all patients, leading to discontinuation of therapy. In two patients this gemcitabine-induced hematotoxicity could be overcome by means of vigorous supportive care, but one patient died after cerebral bleeding due to severe thrombocytopenia. We conclude that gemcitabine in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients should only be used with extreme caution with special focus on platelet counts until solid data from clinical studies for doses and schedules are available.